Lay the Favourite
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Media World: a New Collaboration Was Born
The Media World: A New Collaboration Was Born MeCCSA and AMPE Joint Annual Conference. 5- 7 January 2005, University of Lincoln A report by Serena Formica, University of Nottingham, UK There was much anticipation and expectation leading up to the 2005 MeCCSA conference at the University of Lincoln. This was due to the event being the first joint MeCCSA (Media, Communications and Cultural Studies Association) and AMPE (Association of Media Practice Educators) conference. The purpose of this union was to highlight the common features of both organisations, such as interest in media, Cultural Studies, pedagogy -- all of them reflected in the numerous panels throughout the three-day meeting. Plenary sessions interspersed the many panels, the first of which was presented by Ursula Maier-Rabler (Director of the Centre for Advanced Studies and Research in Information and Communication Technologies and Society, University of Salzburg), who presented a paper entitled "Why do ICTs Matter? The Cultural-Social Milieu as Invisible Underpinning of New Information and Communication Technologies". Dr. Maier-Rabler highlighted the increasing importance of ICTs, considered as a Digital Network, characterised by its universality and non-linearity of contents. As Paul Virilio pointed out, ICTs are permeated by a constant acceleration, which emphasises its element of 'unfinishedness'. The cultural milieu surrounding ICTs was presented as divided into four major social-geographical areas: Social- conservative, Social-democratic, Protestant-liberal and Liberal-conservative. Maier-Rabler observed that the former belong to a collective form of State, whereas the latter belong to a form that is more individualistic. Furthermore, Dr. Maier-Rabler analysed ICTs' perspectives in terms of communication and infrastructure -- media (defined by a shift from programmes to services, media systems to infrastructure and recipient to users) and network (at a technical and social level). -
Mona Lisa Smile Dirección
FICHA TÉCNICA La sonrisa de Mona Lisa Título en inglés: Mona Lisa Smile Dirección: Mike Newell Dirección artística: Mike Newell Producción: Juan Gordon y Pau Calpe Guion: Lawrence Konner, Mark Rosenthal Música: Rachel Portman Fotografía: Anastas N. Michos Montaje: Mick Audsley País: Estados Unidos Año: 2003 Género: Comedia, Drama, Romance. Duración: 117 minutos Idiomas: Italiano, Inglés Protagonistas: Julia Roberts (Katherine Watson), Kirsten Dunst (Betty Warren), Julia Stiles (Joan Brandwyn) Maggie Gyllenhaal (Giselle Levy), Marcia Gay Harden (Nancy Abbey), Dominic West (Bill Dunbar), Topher Grace (Tommy Donegal), Ginnifer Goodwin (Connie Baker), Juliet Stevenson (Amanda Armstrong), John Slattery (Paul Moore), Christopher Joseph Burke (guardian). Premios: Nominada en Globos de Oro, EE.UU. 2004, por Mejor canción original. Nominada en Premios de la Asociación de Críticos de Cine Broadcast. 2004 por mejor canción. Nominada en Premios de la Sociedad de Críticos de Cine de Phoenix (PFCS). 2004 al Premio por mejor uso de música previamente publicada o grabada Nominada en Premios Satélite 2004, por Golden Satellite Award por Mejor canción original. Sinopsis: Katherine Watson es una profesora de historia del arte que viaja desde California al campus de la universidad de Wellesley en Nueva Inglaterra en el año 1953. Estamos en plena postguerra y la profesora Watson tiene en su clase a las mejores estudiantes del país a las que espera abrir muchas puertas, aprovechando las oportunidades que se les ofrezcan. Sin embargo, poco después de su llegada, Katherine se da cuenta de que la prestigiosa institución es bastante conservadora y parece tener otro tipo de prioridades que no son precisamente académicas. La propuesta de matrimonio de una joven está considerado como un premio mayor que una buena educación. -
He Dreams of Giants
From the makers of Lost In La Mancha comes A Tale of Obsession… He Dreams of Giants A film by Keith Fulton and Lou Pepe RUNNING TIME: 84 minutes United Kingdom, 2019, DCP, 5.1 Dolby Digital Surround, Aspect Ratio16:9 PRESS CONTACT: Cinetic Media Ryan Werner and Charlie Olsky 1 SYNOPSIS “Why does anyone create? It’s hard. Life is hard. Art is hard. Doing anything worthwhile is hard.” – Terry Gilliam From the team behind Lost in La Mancha and The Hamster Factor, HE DREAMS OF GIANTS is the culmination of a trilogy of documentaries that have followed film director Terry Gilliam over a twenty-five-year period. Charting Gilliam’s final, beleaguered quest to adapt Don Quixote, this documentary is a potent study of creative obsession. For over thirty years, Terry Gilliam has dreamed of creating a screen adaptation of Cervantes’ masterpiece. When he first attempted the production in 2000, Gilliam already had the reputation of being a bit of a Quixote himself: a filmmaker whose stories of visionary dreamers raging against gigantic forces mirrored his own artistic battles with the Hollywood machine. The collapse of that infamous and ill-fated production – as documented in Lost in La Mancha – only further cemented Gilliam’s reputation as an idealist chasing an impossible dream. HE DREAMS OF GIANTS picks up Gilliam’s story seventeen years later as he finally mounts the production once again and struggles to finish it. Facing him are a host of new obstacles: budget constraints, a history of compromise and heightened expectations, all compounded by self-doubt, the toll of aging, and the nagging existential question: What is left for an artist when he completes the quest that has defined a large part of his career? 2 Combining immersive verité footage of Gilliam’s production with intimate interviews and archival footage from the director’s entire career, HE DREAMS OF GIANTS is a revealing character study of a late-career artist, and a meditation on the value of creativity in the face of mortality. -
Guide to the Papers of the Capri Community Film Society
Capri Community Film Society Papers Guide to the Papers of the Capri Community Film Society Auburn University at Montgomery Archives and Special Collections © AUM Library Written By: Rickey Best & Jason Kneip Last Updated: 2/19/2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Content Page # Collection Summary 2 Administrative Information 2 Restrictions 2-3 Index Terms 3 Agency History 3-4 1 of 64 Capri Community Film Society Papers Scope and Content 5 Arrangement 5-10 Inventory 10- Collection Summary Creator: Capri Community Film Society Title: Capri Community Film Society Papers Dates: 1983-present Quantity: 6 boxes; 6.0 cu. Ft. Identification: 92/2 Contact Information: AUM Library Archives & Special Collections P.O. Box 244023 Montgomery, AL 36124-4023 Ph: (334) 244-3213 Email: [email protected] Administrative Information Preferred Citation: Capri Community Film Society Papers, Auburn University Montgomery Library, Archives & Special Collections. Acquisition Information: The collection began with an initial transfer on September 19, 1991. A second donation occurred in February, 1995. Since then, regular donations of papers occur on a yearly basis. Processed By: Jermaine Carstarphen, Student Assistant & Rickey Best, Archivist/Special Collections Librarian (1993); Jason Kneip, Archives/Special Collections Librarian. Samantha McNeilly, Archives/Special Collections Assistant. 2 of 64 Capri Community Film Society Papers Restrictions Restrictions on access: Access to membership files is closed for 25 years from date of donation. Restrictions on usage: Researchers are responsible for addressing copyright issues on materials not in the public domain. Index Terms The material is indexed under the following headings in the Auburn University at Montgomery’s Library catalogs – online and offline. -
Film Appreciation Wednesdays 6-10Pm in the Carole L
Mike Traina, professor Petaluma office #674, (707) 778-3687 Hours: Tues 3-5pm, Wed 2-5pm [email protected] Additional days by appointment Media 10: Film Appreciation Wednesdays 6-10pm in the Carole L. Ellis Auditorium Course Syllabus, Spring 2017 READ THIS DOCUMENT CAREFULLY! Welcome to the Spring Cinema Series… a unique opportunity to learn about cinema in an interdisciplinary, cinematheque-style environment open to the general public! Throughout the term we will invite a variety of special guests to enrich your understanding of the films in the series. The films will be preceded by formal introductions and followed by public discussions. You are welcome and encouraged to bring guests throughout the term! This is not a traditional class, therefore it is important for you to review the course assignments and due dates carefully to ensure that you fulfill all the requirements to earn the grade you desire. We want the Cinema Series to be both entertaining and enlightening for students and community alike. Welcome to our college film club! COURSE DESCRIPTION This course will introduce students to one of the most powerful cultural and social communications media of our time: cinema. The successful student will become more aware of the complexity of film art, more sensitive to its nuances, textures, and rhythms, and more perceptive in “reading” its multilayered blend of image, sound, and motion. The films, texts, and classroom materials will cover a broad range of domestic, independent, and international cinema, making students aware of the culture, politics, and social history of the periods in which the films were produced. -
John Bull University of Lincoln 'We Cannot All Be Masters, Nor All Masters/Cannot Truly Be Follow'd': Joe Orton's Holida
John Bull University of Lincoln ‘We cannot all be masters, nor all masters/Cannot truly be follow’d’: Joe Orton’s Holiday Camp Bacchae – matters of class, genre and medium in The Erpingham Camp. Joe Orton is thought of largely as a writer for the theatre, and yet three of his plays first appeared on television: as many as first appeared on stage. In what follows I want to consider just one of these, The Erpingham Camp (1967) and, by looking at the way in which it evolved both before and after its first outing on television, to offer to both reposition this play in the oeuvre and to re-open the debate about what Orton was moving towards theatrically.1 Before considering its development, it will be useful first to reflect on the public perception of the young dramatist at the time he started to work on it. From a distance of some fifty years, and in a very different social and cultural climate, it is extremely hard to fully comprehend the kind of impact that Joe Orton’s plays had when first produced: and, concomitantly, it is just about impossible to understand the degree of hostility that they aroused in many quarters, and yet it is important to do so in order to understand how Orton dealt practically with the implications of this hostility. Nor was it confined to sections of the paying public and to newspaper critics, as reaction to the work that caused the greatest furore at the time, Loot (1964), will demonstrate. Examination of the Lord Chamberlain’s archive reveals that there was considerable internal pressure to refuse to grant it a licence at all: a reader’s report by Kyle Fletcher (8 December 1964) argued that the play 1 Work on this article has been greatly aided by research in the following archives: ‘Joe Orton Collection’, University of Leicester; ‘’Lord Chancellor’s Papers’ and ‘Peter Gill Archive’, British Library; ‘Lyndsay Anderson Archive’, University of Stirling; the British Film Institute archive. -
MY BEAUTIFUL LAUNDRETTE London W1J 9LN Followed by a Q&A with STEPHEN FREARS and HANIF KUREISHI Cbe Hosted by LESLIE FELPERIN
BAFTA HERITAGE SCREENING Thursday 16 April 2O15 BAFTA 195 Piccadilly MY BEAUTIFUL LAUNDRETTE London W1J 9LN Followed by a Q&A with STEPHEN FREARS and HANIF KUREISHI CBE Hosted by LESLIE FELPERIN My Beautiful Laundrette exploded onto our screens thirty years ago and cemented the reputation of director Stephen Frears as one of our most original and distinguished film makers. The film’s screenplay, by Hanif Kureishi, was a landmark debut that received a BAFTA nomination and established Kureishi as a major screenwriting talent. The film became an international success and received wide critical acclaim. The film critic Roger Ebert reviewed the film on its US release and is reproduced here in an edited version. Release yeaR: 1985 Runtime: 97 mins DiRectoR: Stephen Frears PRoDUCERs: Sarah Radclyffe, Tim Bevan scReenwRiteR: Hanif Kureishi hen people told me laundry. It is the story of two kinds outside and bares her breasts to Omar they’d seen My Beautiful of outsiders (Omar and Johnny) in through the French doors. Laundrette and it was modern London. The movie is not concerned with a good movie, I had My Beautiful Laundrette refuses to plot, but with giving us a feeling for the Wa tendency to believe them, for who commit its plot to any particular agenda, society its characters inhabit. Modern would dare to make a bad movie with and I found that interesting. It’s not about Britain is a study in contrasts, between such an uncommercial title? The laundry whether Johnny and Omar will remain rich and poor, between upper and lower in question is a storefront operation in lovers or about whether the laundry classes, between native British and the one of the seedier areas of London, and will be a success. -
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study Love In
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study Love in the Time of Cholera is a film that was directed by England director, Mike Newell, which in screen writer is Ronald Harwood and Gabriel Garcia Marquez, then producer by Scott Steindorff and editor by Mick Audsley. It was released in November 16, 2007 in English and there is some filming location at Cartagena (Colombia), London (UK) and Twickenham Film Studios, England (UK). Information about box office from imdb.com that budget Love in the Time of Cholera movie $45,000,000 (estimated) while in opening weekend $1,924,860 (USA) 852 screens and RUR 346,488 (Russia) 3 screens. The category of this film is drama romance in 139 minute of duration of this film. Love in the Time of Cholera was production by New Line Cinema, Stone Village Pictures, Grosvenor Park Media. Mike Newell is one of famous director. Mike Newell was born on March 28, 1942 in St. Albans, Hertfordshire, England. He was raised the son of amateur actors who exposed him early in life to the theatrical world. After receiving his education from St. Albans School, he attended the University of Cambridge, where he majored in English. Following his graduation in the early 1960s, Newell joined Granada Television as a 1 2 production trainee and spent a few years learning his craft with the intention of entering the theatre world. Instead he begin directing television helming the gangster series “Spindoe” (ITV, 1968) and the crime serial “Big Breadwinner Hog” (ITV, 1969) along with fellow director Michael Apted. -
Sammy and Rosie Get Laid Yves Lafontaine
Document generated on 09/25/2021 9:51 a.m. 24 images Sammy and Rosie Get Laid Yves Lafontaine Number 37, 1988 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/22302ac See table of contents Publisher(s) 24/30 I/S ISSN 0707-9389 (print) 1923-5097 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review Lafontaine, Y. (1988). Review of [Sammy and Rosie Get Laid]. 24 images, (37), 61–61. Tous droits réservés © 24 images inc., 1988 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ SAMMY AND ROSIE GET LAID Yves Lafontaine ammy et Rosie s'envoient en l'air. Et même plusieurs fois. Mais pas né cessairement ensemble. Sammy est un jeune comptable londonien d'ori gine pakistanaise. Sa femme, Rosie, Sest anglaise. C'est une écrivains de gauche et une travailleuse sociale. Ils for ment un couple moderne, libre, qui s'aime, Catherine Deneuve enquête dans Agent Trouble tout en entretenant une relation extra conjugale chacun de leur côté. Au cours subversion implique par définition le boule viennent nourrir le drame. La musique d'une émeute faisant rage autour de leur versement des valeurs et des idées du «hollywoodienne» de Gabriel Yared et la appartement londonien, Rafi, le père de spectacle dominant. -
Copyright by Alexandra Lynn Barron 2005
Copyright By Alexandra Lynn Barron 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Alexandra Lynn Barron certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Postcolonial Unions: The Queer National Romance in Film and Literature Committee: __________________ Lisa Moore, Supervisor __________________ Mia Carter __________________ Janet Staiger __________________ Ann Cvetkovich __________________ Neville Hoad Postcolonial Unions: The Queer National Romance in Film and Literature by Alexandra Lynn Barron, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2005 For my mother who taught me to read and made sure that I loved it. Acknowledgments It is odd to have a single name on a project that has benefited from so many people’s contributions. I have been writing these acknowledgments in my head since I began the project, but now that the time is here to set them down I am a bit at a loss as to how to convey how truly indebted I am. To start, I would like to thank Sabrina Barton, Mia Carter, Ann Cvetkovich, Neville Hoad, and Janet Staiger for their insights, for their encouragement, and for teaching me what it means to be an engaged scholar. Lisa Moore has been a teacher, a writing coach, a cheerleader, and a friend. She approached my work with a combination of rigor and compassion that made this dissertation far better than it would have been without her guidance. I could not have done this without her. -
HUGO LUCZYC-WYHOWSKI Production Designer
HUGO LUCZYC-WYHOWSKI Production Designer Feature Films Include: MONTE CARLO – 20th Century Fox – Thomas Bezucha, director I LOVE YOU PHILLIP MORRIS – LD Entertainment – John Requa & Glenn Ficarra, directors FLASH OF GENIUS – Universal Pictures – Marc Abraham, director MARRIED LIFE – Sony Pictures Classics – Ira Sachs, director MARTIAN CHILD – New Line Cinema – Menno Meyjes, director MRS. HENDERSON PRESENTS – Pathé Pictures – Stephen Frears, director DIRTY DANCING: HAVANA NIGHTS – Lions Gate Films – Guy Ferland, director DIRTY PRETTY THINGS – Miramax Films – Stephen Frears, director THE TRUTH ABOUT CHARLIE – Universal Pictures – Jonathan Demme, director SNATCH – Sony Pictures – Guy Ritchie, director BIRTHDAY GIRL – Miramax Films – Jez Butterworth, director MADELINE – TriStar Pictures – Daisy Mayer, director MOJO – Channel Four Films – Jez Butterworth, director COUSIN BETTE – 20th Century Fox – Des McAnuff, director NIL BY MOUTH – Sony Pictures Classics – Gary Oldman, director THE AFFAIR – HBO Films – Paul Seed, director WHEN SATURDAY COMES – Guild – Maria Giese, director BLACK EASTER – BBC – Ben Bolt, director UNCOVERED – CiBy 2000 – Jim McBride, director KLEPTOMANIA – Warner Bros. – Don Boyd, director THE MUSIC OF CHANCE – IRS Media – Philip Haas, director WATERLAND – Fine Line Features – Stephen Gyllenhaal, director A WOMAN AT WAR – Canal Plus – Ed Bennet, director SMACK AND THISTLE – Channel Four Films – Tunde Ikoli, director DREAM DEMON – Warner Bros. – Harley Cokeliss, director SAMMY AND ROSIE GET LAID – Cinecom Pictures – Stephen Frears, director PRICK UP YOUR EARS – MGM – Stephen Frears, director PERSONAL SERVICES – Vestron Pictures – Terry Jones, director MY BEAUTIFUL LAUNDRETTE – Orion Classics – Stephen Fears, director Commercials Include (Full List Available Upon Request): MILLER LITE – Biscuit Filmworks – Jim Hosking, director MASTERCARD – MJZ, Inc. – Lenard Dorfman, director LLOYD’S – MJZ, Inc. -
1 Sticky Stories: Joe Orton, Queer History, Queer Dramaturgy
Sticky Stories: Joe Orton, Queer History, Queer Dramaturgy. Stephen Farrier Royal Central School of Speech and Drama, University of London. Joe Orton, commonly thought of as a playwright of risqué farces in the 1960s, was a very present figure for a while in the gay community in the UK in the late 1980s and early 1990s (perhaps because his biography was published late in the 1970s, his diaries in 1986 and a film based on the diaries released 1987). His presence in 1980s and 1990s gay culture was in part because he met a death worthy of column inches and, importantly, he stood as emblematic of a past homosexual who refused to curb his sexuality whilst living in a conservative social context. In England and Wales, homosexuality was not criminalised in the 1980s and 1990s as it had been in the 1950s and 1960s, but there were present homophobic social values and legislation (Section 28, unequal age of consent) that resonated with the context within which Orton was writing and his work was first being produced.1 Orton’s figure as a queer and a playwright stood as both inspiration and a lesson from the past, one that reminded queers and gays in the 1980s and 1990s that the fight for equality does not end with a change in the legal status of homosexuality, or indeed in the 2010s, with equal marriage. Yet in recent years Orton’s work has fallen out of favour and does not appear as often as it once did on the queer cultural landscape. There are many reasons for this, not least of all that the kind of work that Orton makes might not register as queer or even gay now.