476461 1 En Bookbackmatter 189..268

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

476461 1 En Bookbackmatter 189..268 Appendix A Survey Questionnaire © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 189 L. Sui Pheng and L. Shing Hou, Construction Quality and the Economy, Management in the Built Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5847-0 190 Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire 191 192 Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire 193 194 Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire 195 196 Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire 197 198 Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire 199 200 Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire 201 Appendix B Path Relationships Significant at the 1% Significance Level H1a-e H2 H4a-b © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 203 L. Sui Pheng and L. Shing Hou, Construction Quality and the Economy, Management in the Built Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5847-0 Appendix C Path Relationships Significant at the 5% Significance Level H1a-e H2 H4a-b © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 205 L. Sui Pheng and L. Shing Hou, Construction Quality and the Economy, Management in the Built Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5847-0 Appendix D Path Relationships Significant at the 10% Significance Level © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 207 L. Sui Pheng and L. Shing Hou, Construction Quality and the Economy, Management in the Built Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5847-0 Appendix E Path Relationships Significant at the 25% Significance Level H1a-e H2 H4a-b H3a H3c © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 209 L. Sui Pheng and L. Shing Hou, Construction Quality and the Economy, Management in the Built Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5847-0 Appendix F Path Relationships Significant at the 50% Significance Level H1a-e H2 H4a-b H3a H5a H5b H1g, h, I, j, k, l H3b H4a-b H5b H3c H4a-b H1n-p © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 211 L. Sui Pheng and L. Shing Hou, Construction Quality and the Economy, Management in the Built Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5847-0 Appendix G Case Study Interview with Mr. A Mr. A Date of interview: 7 December 2017 Time of interview: 3pm to 4pm BCA CRS grading of current company: A1 Contractor Position in the company: Senior QA/QC Manager Years of experience in the construction industry: >20 years The first question, when did you join the company? 1996. Why are some of your company’s projects under the Construction Quality Assessment Scheme (CONQUAS) while others are under the quality mark (QM) scheme? These two schemes are different. CONQUAS is compulsory for public housing projects. Beside these private projects, we also go for CONQUAS. By doing QM, we believe that the score will be better because QM score will be translated to architectural score so that helps the overall CONQUAS score. On top of that, we believe that by subjecting our projects to QM, we will produce better quality units. And of course QM is an initiative by developers. Otherwise it has been tradition and we have been doing that. When I look at CONQUAS scoring, I realized that Architectural scored the lowest among the three. Why? Yes, it’s always the case for most Contractors. Because in a construction site, I believe during your attachment, you went through the process. In terms of structural works it’s relatively speaking, straightforward. Furthermore, sampling can be done © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 213 L. Sui Pheng and L. Shing Hou, Construction Quality and the Economy, Management in the Built Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5847-0 214 Appendix G: Case Study Interview with Mr. A and this makes it easier to control because, on the construction site, structural works subcontractor is usually a single guy. He does everything; he does concreting, he does formwork, he does rebar. Easier to manage. For that matter CONQUAS score tends to be higher. MEP, also not that difficult, as it’s based on whether the work follows the drawings or not. But, architectural trade is more complicated. There are many trades involved, and they are interdependent. So somehow, it’s not easy to control or manage the quality so as to speak. And many a times, quality suffers when the sequencing is wrong. Why sequencing is wrong? Because of rushing to meet the deadline. So we compromise. Look at the number of workers involved in the construction site. You see that most workers are in the architectural trade and there are a lot of dependencies. So once one guy fails, the others will suffer. Over your past fifteen years of experience with your current company, do you notice any dips in construction quality due to any particular reason? I don’t remember any sudden dip in the past, as far as our company is concerned. I don’t know about the others. Because as long as you have a culture and as long as you have a team to look at, manage the quality, more or less the standard will be there. Especially so when, just now I mentioned, CONQUAS, QM, that is the yardstick that will help to track and monitor our performance. So, unless you don’t have a standard, then it will drop, without knowing. The past CONQUAS score for your company is in fact much higher than past CONQUAS score in some of the recession years in 1998, 2001 global IT meltdown, 2002, 2003 SARS period which dragged on to 2004, 2008 financial crisis, and now we have the looming technical recession. Just by looking at the periods of recession, I realize that many of your company’s CONQUAS scored relatively poorly in the recession years. Why? Of course, from the earlier years, we are lower. Same with all the other Contractors. I think it’s typical of all the Contractors. Because slowly they know what is expected of them. They know how to score better so it gets better and better. (Interviewee looking through CONQUAS trends that interviewer handed him): This is school (pointing to the 2001/2002 period). School cannot be compared with residential. This is school again. I can tell. I don’t think so. If you ask me, I don’t think so. The trend for my company is going up. We plotted this out before. Can you point out two projects that the construction quality is not as good compared to the rest of your track records? As I mentioned, one of the school projects we didn’t do quite well as it was an institution and we have no experience in that before. I was involved in that project actually. One of the reasons was because that project went into delay. Of course quality will not be the priority. And it is time that matters most. So for that matter, it suffers. So, if you ask me, this school project is one of the not as good ones. We have another school around the same time scoring better 78.7. That school went Appendix G: Case Study Interview with Mr. A 215 relatively smoother than mine so it most likely translates into higher quality. So it’s mostly Addition and Alteration (A&A) works and it’s relatively simpler. It boils down to whether you have the time or not. So is this project affected by economic situation, definitely, not clear here. But, there should be some kind of relationship. When the pricing is low, you tend to get the subcontractors that are not that competent. They are not competent, we will be expecting delay. When there is a delay, there will be a rush. When you rush, I think you study before, time, cost and quality, you should suffer from quality. There is no doubt about that. So this is one but the other one, I can’t find another one. More or less it is the same, I can’t really pin point. The rest are more or less there. Is there any project that has cost constraints? Not really. The thing is that this is our client project. When you talk about client project, most of them are our own projects. We have two companies here, the developer and the contractor. So basically, there won’t be so much of an issue pertaining to cost. If we do external then it’s another story. So if there is anything you compare Housing and Development Board (HDB), those are external projects. We are quite familiar with HDB so, more or less it’s there. 80 plus 90 plus, the next thing we are moving into the CONQUAS star, we have not gotten a CONQUAS star for HDB. We got three projects ending about the same time, end of this year, so we are aiming for that. The trend is going up and there is no significant drop. Based on your experience, what do you think are the impacts of recession on the industry? Economic recession comes there is not enough projects and people cut throat to get projects. Actually it’s happening now also, HDB price keep dropping until we don’t want to tender. Building and Construction Authority (BCA) are also warning the industry not to drop the price like that. So, if you ask me, definitely there’s an impact, whoever gets the job in order to make some profit out of it, they will compromise something. But of course, material wise they can’t compromise much because some how they need to be approved, the materials have to come from an approved supplier.
Recommended publications
  • The Singapore Urban Systems Studies Booklet Seriesdraws On
    Biodiversity: Nature Conservation in the Greening of Singapore - In a small city-state where land is considered a scarce resource, the tension between urban development and biodiversity conservation, which often involves protecting areas of forest from being cleared for development, has always been present. In the years immediately after independence, the Singapore government was more focused on bread-and-butter issues. Biodiversity conservation was generally not high on its list of priorities. More recently, however, the issue of biodiversity conservation has become more prominent in Singapore, both for the government and its citizens. This has predominantly been influenced by regional and international events and trends which have increasingly emphasised the need for countries to show that they are being responsible global citizens in the area of environmental protection. This study documents the evolution of Singapore’s biodiversity conservation efforts and the on-going paradigm shifts in biodiversity conservation as Singapore moves from a Garden City to a City in a Garden. The Singapore Urban Systems Studies Booklet Series draws on original Urban Systems Studies research by the Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore (CLC) into Singapore’s development over the last half-century. The series is organised around domains such as water, transport, housing, planning, industry and the environment. Developed in close collaboration with relevant government agencies and drawing on exclusive interviews with pioneer leaders, these practitioner-centric booklets present a succinct overview and key principles of Singapore’s development model. Important events, policies, institutions, and laws are also summarised in concise annexes. The booklets are used as course material in CLC’s Leaders in Urban Governance Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar on Aerodrome Emergency Planning –
    SEMINAR ON AERODROME EMERGENCY PLANNING JOINTLY ORGANIZED BY AIRPORT EMERGENCY SERVICE, CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE AND ICAO ASIA AND PACIFIC OFFICE, BANGKOK (Singapore Aviation Academy, 20 to 22 October 2008) SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Aerodrome Emergency Planning (AEP) Seminar was conducted in the form of audio visual presentations by speakers having experience in airport related emergencies to provide and share information, experience, best practices with participants on aerodrome emergency planning and testing. 1.2 The AEP Seminar was organized in coordination with the Airport Emergency Service Division of Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) from 20 to 22 October 2008 in Singapore and was attended by 118 delegates from 26 Asia/Pacific States. 1.3 The speakers were from Ministry of Transport, Singapore, Government Hospitals in Singapore, Singapore Police Force, Qantas Airways, Corporate Communications, Airport Operations and Legal Divisions of CAAS and Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, Singapore. Daily sessions for questions and answers were allocated during the Seminar. The List of Participants is at Attachment A. 1.4 The Agenda item for the seminar is given at Attachment B. A field trip was arranged by AES, CAAS to the Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal and crisis management cells at Changi Airport to observe the full scale aircraft crash at sea exercise on 21 October 2008. A panel discussion on the exercise was conducted on 22 October to solicit feedback and comments from the seminar participants. 2. OBJECTIVE OF THE SEMINAR 2.1 The ICAO Regional Office initiated a survey in April 2008 to assess the level of implementation of ICAO Annex 14 requirements on AEP and conduct of exercise to test the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Capital and Inequality in Singapore
    SOCIAL CAPITAL AND INEQUALITY IN SINGAPORE by Vincent Kynn Hong Chua A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology University of Toronto © Copyright by Vincent Chua 2010 Social Capital and Inequality in Singapore Vincent Chua Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Written as three publishable papers, this dissertation examines the sources of several forms of social capital in Singapore, and the effects of social capital on occupational success. Using representative survey data from Singapore, these papers make several important theoretical contributions: The first paper examines how and why categorical forms of stratification such as gender and ethnicity tend to produce distinctive forms of network inequalities: for example, whereas Chinese (relative to Malays and Indians) tend to have greater access to well- educated, wealthy, Chinese and weak tie social capital (but not non-kin), men (relative to women) tend to have greater access to men, non-kin and weak ties (but not well- educated, wealthy and Chinese). The key to understanding such distinctive patterns of network inequalities (by gender and ethnicity) is to understand the distinctive ways in ii which gender and ethnic groups are distributed in routine organizations such as schools, paid work and voluntary associations. The second paper examines the significance of personal contacts in job searches, in the context of Singapore’s meritocratic system. I show that in certain sectors such as the state bureaucracy, social networking brings no distinct advantages as appointments are made exclusively on the basis of the credentials of the candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Histories, Practices, Interventions: a Reader in Singapore Contemporary
    A Reader in Singapore Contemporary Art Historie s “This publication alters the landscape , Practices, Interventions: for writing on art in Singapore.” Histories, TK Sabapathy Practices, What are the ideas, practices, issues and institutions that have shaped contemporary Interventions: art in Singapore? Histories, Practices, Interventions: A Reader in Singapore Contemporary Art presents an anthology A Reader in of writings on Singapore contemporary art since the 1970s. Editors Jeffrey Say Singapore and Seng Yu Jin have selected 33 wide- ranging essays by leading art historians, Contemporary Art art critics, curators, artists, playwrights and academics. Comprising texts that reflect diverse writing styles and modes of expression—from personal narrative to theoretical texts to manifestos—this book is an essential resource for students, researchers and art lovers alike. Edited by JEFFREY SAY SENG YU JIN Histories, Practices, Interventions: A Reader in Singapore Contemporary Art Edited by JEFFREY SAY SENG YU JIN Histories, Practices, This work is copyright. Cover image: Interventions: A Reader in Apart from fair dealing for Tang Da Wu’s note was Singapore Contemporary Art the purpose of research, first seen in his 1995 criticism or review as performance work, Please Editors: Jeffrey Say and permitted under the Don’t Give Money to the Arts. Seng Yu Jin Copyright Act 1987, no Tang later recreated the part may be reproduced, note for the Fukuoka Asian Published by the Institute stored in a retrieval Culture Prize exhibition of Contemporary Arts system or transmitted by Tang Da Wu: A Perspective Singapore, 2016 any means without the on the Artist—Photographs, prior permission of the Videos and Text of Singapore Institute of Contemporary publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Communique of the 41St ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, "One ASEAN at the Heart of Dynamic Asia" Singapore, 21 July 2008
    Joint Communique of the 41st ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, "One ASEAN at the Heart of Dynamic Asia" Singapore, 21 July 2008 INTRODUCTION 1 We, the Foreign Ministers of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), met at the 41st ASEAN Ministerial Meeting (AMM) from 20-21 July 2008 in Singapore. His Excellency George Yeo, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Singapore and Chairman of the 41st ASEAN Standing Committee (ASC), chaired the Meeting. We had wide-ranging and productive discussions under the theme of “One ASEAN at the Heart of Dynamic Asia”, during which we reaffirmed our common desire and collective commitment to the establishment of an ASEAN Community of peace, stability, prosperity and social progress. 2 His Excellency Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore, addressed the Opening Ceremony of the 41st AMM. Noting that the celebration of ASEAN’s 40th anniversary brought ASEAN closer to the people, Prime Minister Lee underlined that fostering our people’s understanding of ASEAN’s relevance to their well-being would nurture their sense of belonging to an ASEAN community. This in turn would be critical to our integration efforts. 3 Reviewing the past year under Singapore’s Chairmanship of ASEAN, Prime Minister Lee raised two events which he believed would continue to define ASEAN in the years ahead. First, ASEAN’s response to Cyclone Nargis demonstrated ASEAN’s unity, and showed that ASEAN member countries recognised the responsibilities and obligations of membership. While not perfect, the ASEAN-led tripartite process bridged the gap of trust between the Myanmar authorities and the international community to facilitate the flow of emergency aid to the disaster victims.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegemonic Party Rule in Singapore and Taiwan
    ACCESS TO POWER: HEGEMONIC PARTY RULE IN SINGAPORE AND TAIWAN by Netina Clara Tan M.A., The University of Regina, 2004 M.A., The National University of Singapore, 2000 B.A., The National University of Singapore, 1992 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty Of Graduate Studies (Political Science) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2010 © Netina Clara Tan, 2010 ABSTRACT My dissertation investigates the sources of hegemonic party resilience. I ask why do some hegemonic party regimes persist, while others concede to multipartism? Building on party politics and electoral authoritarianism literature, I develop a mid-range theory based on the concepts of strategic coordination and institutionalization to explain why elites unite and oppositions fail to pose a credible threat. To demonstrate the utility of my explanation, I compare two similar hegemonic parties of different outcomes: the People’s Action Party (PAP) in Singapore and the Kuomintang Party (KMT) in Taiwan. I posit three factors to account for hegemonic party resilience. First, I contend that a hegemonic party that is adept in strategic coordination – by providing public goods and withdrawing political, civil liberties and media freedom – is more likely to win mass support and deter opposition coordination. Both the PAP and early KMT were high performing, strategic regimes that enjoyed growth and forestalled democratization. While the PAP remained the ruling party in Singapore, the KMT controlled the pace of liberalization during its long decade of transition, losing power after a party split. Second, I argue that the PAP is better than the KMT in keeping the ruling elites united because of its institutionalized leadership succession system.
    [Show full text]
  • Keppel Corporation
    Report to Shareholders 2008 Driving a Difference Contents 1 Group Financial Highlights 146 Directors’ Report & Financial Statements 2 Chairman’s Statement 146 – Directors’ Report 6 Interview with CEO 150 – Balance Sheets 10 Key Messages: Driving a Difference 151 – Consolidated Profi t and Loss Account 20 Key Figures 152 – Statements of Changes in Equity 21 Group Strategic Directions 155 – Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 22 Group at a Glance 157 – Notes to the Financial Statements 24 Keppel Around the World 200 – Signifi cant Subsidiaries and 26 Board of Directors Associated Companies 30 Keppel Group Boards of Directors 210 – Statement by Directors 32 Keppel Technology Advisory Panel 211 – Independent Auditors’ Report 34 Senior Management 212 Interested Person Transactions 36 Investor Relations 213 Directors and Key Executives 38 Awards and Accolades 222 Major Properties 40 Special Feature – Safety Excellence 225 Group Five-Year Performance 48 Operating & Financial Review 228 Group Value-Added Statements 49 – Group Structure 229 Share Performance 50 – Management Discussion and Analysis 230 Shareholding Statistics 52 – Offshore & Marine 231 Notice of Annual General Meeting and 64 – Property Closure of Books 72 – Infrastructure 237 Financial Calendar 80 – Investments 238 Corporate Information 86 – Financial Review and Outlook 94 Sustainability Report 96 – Sustainable Development Framework 97 – Sustaining Growth 97 – Corporate Governance 117 – Risk Management 119 – Technology Development 122 – Environment Protection 126 – Empowering Lives 126 – People Development 131 – Health and Safety 132 – Nuturing Communities 132 – Society and Environment 136 – Community Involvement 144 – Highlights in 2008 Driving a Difference Keppel is 40 and fi ghting fi t, chiselled through the many recessions and business cycles and fortifi ed by the resilience of our people.
    [Show full text]
  • Men's Health.Indd
    First Announcement The Third Japan–ASEAN Men’s Health & Aging conference The New Age Man www.MensHealthConference2008.com 1 - 3 DECEMBER 2008 SINGAPORE Organised by: Endorsed by: International College of Surgeons MMen'sen's HHealth.inddealth.indd 1 44/23/07/23/07 112:29:162:29:16 CONTENTS 2008 Organising Committee pg1 Welcome Messages pg2 Foreword pg4 Programme at a Glance pg5 Scientifi c Programme Day One Pg6 Scientifi c Programme Day Two pg7 Scientifi c Programme Day Three pg8 Pre-conference Workshops pg10 Public Forum/Workshop Synopsis pg11 - pg13 Registration Form pg14 Call for Abstracts pg15 About Singapore/Essential Information pg16 - pg19 Acknowledgements pg20 MMen'sen's HHealth.inddealth.indd 2 44/23/07/23/07 112:29:202:29:20 The Third Japan-ASEAN Men’s Health Conference 2008 Organising Committee Congress President Founding President/Advisor Prof Peter H C Lim Prof Akihiko Okuyama Organising Chairman Chairman Dr Ho Siew Hong Prof Dato’ Dr Tan Hui Meng Congress Vice-chairman International Advisor Dr Leonard K H Koh Prof Mikio Namiki Secretary The Third Japan-ASEAN Men’s Health Mr Ng Kok Kit Conference 2008 Council Members Prof Dato’ Dr Tan Hui Meng Treasurer Prof Peter H C Lim Ms Rani Vadiveloo Prof K Apichat Prof Krissada Ratana-Oran Scientifi c Committee Dr Jose Reyes Dr Teoh Seng Hin (Chair) Dr Chrik Jenn Ng Prof E. Kesavan Prof Ganesan Adaikan Dr Richard Y T Chen Dr Peter Chew Publication Committee Dr Suresh Mathani (Chair) Dr Siow Woei Yun Organised by: Society for Men’s Health, Singapore Exhibition Committee Sponsored by: Dr
    [Show full text]
  • Terracotta Warriors Volume 4, Issue 3
    July-September 2011 The World of the Terracotta Warriors Volume 4, Issue Volume 3 ISSN: 1793-5261 Volume 4, Issue 3. editor-in-chief Thangamma Karthigesu editor Marcus Ng project co-ordinator Johan Ong senior designer Ridzwan Ali contributors Christine Van Assche, Dr Alan Chong, Chua Mei Lin Priscilla Chua, Patricia Levasseur de la Motte Marcus Ng, Sim Wan Hui front cover: Armoured infantryman, Qin dynasty (221 – 206 BCE) Courtesy of Shaanxi Cultural Heritage Promotion Center back cover: Kneeling archer (detail), Qin dynasty (221 – 206 BCE) Courtesy of Shaanxi Cultural Heritage Promotion Center printed and bound by Oxford Graphic Printers Pte Ltd july 2011 sept. © National Heritage Board, 2011. BeMuse is published by the Education and Outreach Division of the National Heritage Board. If you have any feedback or wish to contribute an article, please email: [email protected] or go to www.nhb.gov.sg All rights reserved. View of writers and contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of the Publisher. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing from the Publisher and copyright owner. Whilst every care is taken to ensure accuracy of the information in this publication, the Publisher accepts no liability for damages by misinterpretation of information, expressed or implied, within the pages of the magazine. editor’s MUSEINGS. July and August, the much-awaited height of summer in more temperate zones, are CONTEMPORARY a time of intense activity as well in sunny Singapore. It is a period when we take ART FUN 08 stock of the months that have passed and a chance to catch up on our resolutions FOR CHILDREN and goals for the present year.
    [Show full text]