Allodletric Neoteny and the Evolution of Succulence in Cacti
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pereskia Aculeata Miller and Pereskia Grandifolia Haw) And
325 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 75, 2019 The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.cetjournal.it Guest Editors: Sauro Pierucci, Laura Piazza Copyright © 2019, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. ISBN 978-88-95608-72-3; ISSN 2283-9216 DOI: 10.3303/CET1975055 Centesimal Evaluation of Two Species of Ora-pro-nobis (Pereskia aculeata Miller and Pereskia grandifolia Haw) and Application in Extruded Product a a a b Maria F. F. Carvalho , Leonardo M. M , Maiara P. Mendes , Vanesa Gesser , Claudia C. F. monteirod, Rosane M. Peraltab, Antonio R. G. Monteiroc* a Centre of Agriculture Science, Food Science division. State University of Maringá, 5790, Colombo Av., CEP: 87020-900, Maringá-PR, Brazil. b Biochemistry Department, State University of Maringá, 5790, Colombo Av., CEP: 87020-900, Maringá-PR, Brazil. c Food Engineer Department, State University of Maringá, 5790, Colombo Av., CEP: 87020-900, Maringá-PR, Brazil. d Department of Design, State University of Maringá, 5790, Colombo Av., CEP: 87020-900, Maringá-PR, Brazil. [email protected] Some vegetables that are rarely used and/or unknown in daily menu, can represent great sources of vital nutrients to maintain the metabolic health of their consumers. Among them is Pereskia spp family, commonly known as ora-pro-nobis, "the flesh of the poor". According to RDC No. 54/2012 (BRASIL, 2012), Ora-pro- nobis can be considered a functional food due to its high protein content (approximately 25%), with high digestibility (80%), 3.35g/100g of calcium, 2.42g/100g of potassium, 1.13g/100g of phosphorus, 0.45g/100g of magnesium and 0.98g/100g of sulphur, leaf (140.36 ppm) and stem (88.75 ppm) iron. -
Systematic Morphology of Fishes in the Early 21St Century
Copeia 103, No. 4, 2015, 858–873 When Tradition Meets Technology: Systematic Morphology of Fishes in the Early 21st Century Eric J. Hilton1, Nalani K. Schnell2, and Peter Konstantinidis1 Many of the primary groups of fishes currently recognized have been established through an iterative process of anatomical study and comparison of fishes that has spanned a time period approaching 500 years. In this paper we give a brief history of the systematic morphology of fishes, focusing on some of the individuals and their works from which we derive our own inspiration. We further discuss what is possible at this point in history in the anatomical study of fishes and speculate on the future of morphology used in the systematics of fishes. Beyond the collection of facts about the anatomy of fishes, morphology remains extremely relevant in the age of molecular data for at least three broad reasons: 1) new techniques for the preparation of specimens allow new data sources to be broadly compared; 2) past morphological analyses, as well as new ideas about interrelationships of fishes (based on both morphological and molecular data) provide rich sources of hypotheses to test with new morphological investigations; and 3) the use of morphological data is not limited to understanding phylogeny and evolution of fishes, but rather is of broad utility to understanding the general biology (including phenotypic adaptation, evolution, ecology, and conservation biology) of fishes. Although in some ways morphology struggles to compete with the lure of molecular data for systematic research, we see the anatomical study of fishes entering into a new and exciting phase of its history because of recent technological and methodological innovations. -
Comparative Anatomy and Functional Morphology University of California at Berkeley Department of Integrative Biology (5 Units)
Comparative Anatomy and Functional Morphology University of California at Berkeley Department of Integrative Biology (5 Units) Course Description: This course is an in-depth look at the biology of form and function. We will examine vertebrate anatomy to understand how structures develop, how they have evolved, and how they interact with one another to allow animals to live in a variety of environments. We will study the integration of the skeletal, muscular, nervous, vascular, respiratory, digestive, endocrine, and urogenital systems to explore the historical and present diversity of vertebrate animals. Format: This course will include lecture, discussion, and laboratory sessions. Lectures will focus primarily on broad concepts and ideas. Discussion sections will emphasize how to both read and analyze primary scientific literature. Laboratory sessions will allow students to physically explore the morphologies of a diversity of taxa and will include museum specimens as well as dissections of whole animals. Lecture: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, 9:30-11:00a.m. Discussion: Monday and Thursday, 11:00a.m. or 12:00p.m. Laboratory: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, 2:00-5:00p.m. All students must take lectures, discussion sections, and laboratory sections concurrently. Attendance of all sections is required. Goals: 1. A comparative approach will allow students to gain experience in identifying similarities and differences among taxa and further their understanding of how both evolutionary and environmental contexts influence the morphology and function. 2. Students will improve their ability to ask questions and answer them using scientific methodology. 3. Students will gain factual knowledge of terms and concepts regarding vertebrate anatomy and functional morphology. -
Gooseberry Flyer.Pub
ST PE T Barbados Gooseberry ER Please Call AL 553-5236 Photo by ARC-PPRI. Photographs by TNC Hawaii What is it? Why is it a What is MoMISC What can you do? • Barbados gooseberry problem in doing? • Do not grow Barbados (Pereskia aculeata) is gooseberry. Hawaii? • The Molokai/Maui a cactus from the West Invasive Species • If left unchecked, Indies that is invading Committee is a multi- • Learn to identify invasive Barbados gooseberry Hawaii. sector partnership species in the MoMISC can form a dense fighting to protect brochure. canopy that quickly • Gooseberry appears Molokai from invasive smothers out native as an erect woody plants and animals that • Call MoMISC at 553-5236 vegetation under a liana when young, and threaten our if you see Barbados solid blanket of later a thorny vine that environment, economy, gooseberry anywhere on vines. can climb up trees. and quality of life. Molokai. • It forms dense, spiny • The 2-4 inch long, eye- • MoMISC prevents new • Grow native plants thickets and litter shaped leaves are a invasive species from instead of non-native which are miserable dark glossy green. becoming established on plants. Encourage your for hikers and Molokai through friends to do the same. hunters. • It is covered in clusters education and outreach. of long slender spines • Before purchasing a (1-2 inches long). • Plants can spread • MoMISC works with the plant, check if it is through seeds or community to control invasive. You can ask • The flowers are white, various plant parts invasive species on your nursery, call yellowish or pinkish. (leaves, stems, etc). -
Comparative Anatomy: for Educators and Caregivers
ABOUT THIS PACKET COMPARATIVE ANATOMY: FOR EDUCATORS AND CAREGIVERS INTRODUCTION This Burke Box packet uses the basic principles of comparative anatomy to lead students through a critical thinking investigation. Learners and educators can explore digital specimen cards, view a PowerPoint lesson, and conduct independent research through recommended resources before filling in a final comparative Venn diagram. By the end of the packet, students will use a comparative anatomy lens to independently answer the question: are bats considered birds or mammals? BACKGROUND The study of comparative anatomy can be traced back to investigations made by philosophers in ancient Greece. Using firsthand observations and accounts by hunters, farmers, and doctors, Aristotle and other Greek philosophers made detailed anatomical comparisons between species. The field of comparative anatomy has contributed to a better understanding of the evolution of species. Once thought to be a linear pattern, studies utilizing the principles of comparative anatomy identified shared ancestors among many species, indicating evolution occurs in a branching manner. Comparative anatomy has been used to prove relationships between species previously thought unrelated, or disprove relationships between species that share similar features but are not biologically related. Comparative anatomy can study internal organs and soft tissues, skeletal structures, embryonic phases and DNA. Researchers look for homologous structures, or structures within species that are the same internally. These structures indicate shared ancestry and an evolutionary relationships between species. Researchers also look for analogous structures, which may look similar at a glance but have different internal structures. Analogous structures indicate the species have divergent ancestry. Vestigial structures are also important in comparative anatomy. -
Evolution of the Muscular System in Tetrapod Limbs Tatsuya Hirasawa1* and Shigeru Kuratani1,2
Hirasawa and Kuratani Zoological Letters (2018) 4:27 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-018-0110-2 REVIEW Open Access Evolution of the muscular system in tetrapod limbs Tatsuya Hirasawa1* and Shigeru Kuratani1,2 Abstract While skeletal evolution has been extensively studied, the evolution of limb muscles and brachial plexus has received less attention. In this review, we focus on the tempo and mode of evolution of forelimb muscles in the vertebrate history, and on the developmental mechanisms that have affected the evolution of their morphology. Tetrapod limb muscles develop from diffuse migrating cells derived from dermomyotomes, and the limb-innervating nerves lose their segmental patterns to form the brachial plexus distally. Despite such seemingly disorganized developmental processes, limb muscle homology has been highly conserved in tetrapod evolution, with the apparent exception of the mammalian diaphragm. The limb mesenchyme of lateral plate mesoderm likely plays a pivotal role in the subdivision of the myogenic cell population into individual muscles through the formation of interstitial muscle connective tissues. Interactions with tendons and motoneuron axons are involved in the early and late phases of limb muscle morphogenesis, respectively. The mechanism underlying the recurrent generation of limb muscle homology likely resides in these developmental processes, which should be studied from an evolutionary perspective in the future. Keywords: Development, Evolution, Homology, Fossils, Regeneration, Tetrapods Background other morphological characters that may change during The fossil record reveals that the evolutionary rate of growth. Skeletal muscles thus exhibit clear advantages vertebrate morphology has been variable, and morpho- for the integration of paleontology and evolutionary logical deviations and alterations have taken place unevenly developmental biology. -
CACTACEAE 1. PERESKIA Miller, Gard. Dict. Abr., Ed. 4. 1754
CACTACEAE 仙人掌科 xian ren zhang ke Li Zhenyu (李振宇)1; Nigel P. Taylor2 Fleshy perennials, shrubs, trees or vines, terrestrial or epiphytic. Stems jointed, terete, globose, flattened, or fluted, mostly leafless and variously spiny. Leaves alternate, flat or subulate to terete, vestigial, or entirely absent; spines, glochids (easily detached, small, bristlelike spines), and flowers always arising from cushionlike, axillary areoles (modified short shoots). Flowers solitary, sessile, rarely clustered and stalked (in Pereskia), bisexual, rarely unisexual, actinomorphic or occasionally zygomorphic. Receptacle tube (hypanthium or perianth tube) absent or short to elongate, naked or invested with leaflike bracts, scales, areoles, and hairs, bristles, or spines; perianth segments usually numerous, in a sepaloid to petaloid series. Stamens numerous, variously inserted in throat and tube; anthers 2-loculed, dehiscing longitudinally. Ovary (pericarpel) inferior, rarely superior, 1-loculed, with 3 to many parietal (rarely basal) placentas; ovules usually numerous; style 1; stigmas 2 to numerous, papillate, rarely 2-fid. Fruit juicy or dry, naked, scaly, hairy, bristly, or spiny, indehiscent or dehiscent, when juicy then pulp derived from often deliquescent funicles (except in Pereskia). Seeds usually numerous, often arillate or strophiolate; embryo curved or rarely straight; endosperm present or absent; cotyledons reduced or vestigial, rarely leaflike. About 110 genera and more than 1000 species: temperate and tropical America; Rhipsalis baccifera (J. S. Mueller) Stearn native in tropical Africa, Madagascar, Comoros, Mascarenes, and Sri Lanka; some species of other genera now extensively naturalized in the Old World through human agency; more than 60 genera and 600 species cultivated as ornamentals or hedges in China, of which four genera and seven species more or less naturalized. -
Comparative Anatomy of the Caudal Skeleton of Lantern Fishes of The
Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía Vol. 51, Nº3: 713-718, diciembre 2016 DOI 10.4067/S0718-19572016000300025 RESEARCH NOTE Comparative anatomy of the caudal skeleton of lantern fishes of the genus Triphoturus Fraser-Brunner, 1949 (Teleostei: Myctophidae) Anatomía comparada del complejo caudal de los peces linterna del género Triphoturus Fraser-Brunner, 1949 (Teleostei: Myctophidae) Uriel Rubio-Rodríguez1, Adrián F. González-Acosta1 and Héctor Villalobos1 1Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Departamento de Pesquerías y Biología Marina, CICIMAR-IPN, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional s/n, Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz, BCS, 23096, México. [email protected] Abstract.- The caudal skeleton provides important information for the study of the systematics and ecomorphology of teleostean fish. However, studies based on the analysis of osteological traits are scarce for fishes in the order Myctophiformes. This paper describes the anatomy of the caudal bones of 3 Triphoturus species: T. mexicanus (Gilbert, 1890), T. nigrescens (Brauer, 1904) and T. oculeum (Garman, 1899). A comparative analysis was performed on cleared and stained specimens to identify the differences and similarities of bony elements and the organization of the caudal skeleton among the selected species. Triphoturus mexicanus differs from T. oculeum in the presence of medial neural plates and a foramen in the parhypural, while T. nigrescens differs from their congeners in a higher number of hypurals (2 + 4 = 6) and the separation and number of cartilaginous elements. This osteological description of the caudal region allowed updates to the nomenclature of bony and cartilaginous elements in myctophids. Further, this study allows for the recognition of structural differences between T. -
Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory
United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research Service of the Tropics Agriculture Handbook No. 642 An Inventory t Abstract Acknowledgments Martin, Franklin W., Carl W. Cannpbell, Ruth M. Puberté. We owe first thanks to the botanists, horticulturists 1987 Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: An and taxonomists throughout the world who have left Inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, written records of the fruits they encountered. Agriculture Handbook No. 642, 252 p., illus. Second, we thank Richard A. Hamilton, who read and The edible fruits of the Tropics are nnany in number, criticized the major part of the manuscript. His help varied in form, and irregular in distribution. They can be was invaluable. categorized as major or minor. Only about 300 Tropical fruits can be considered great. These are outstanding We also thank the many individuals who read, criti- in one or more of the following: Size, beauty, flavor, and cized, or contributed to various parts of the book. In nutritional value. In contrast are the more than 3,000 alphabetical order, they are Susan Abraham (Indian fruits that can be considered minor, limited severely by fruits), Herbert Barrett (citrus fruits), Jose Calzada one or more defects, such as very small size, poor taste Benza (fruits of Peru), Clarkson (South African fruits), or appeal, limited adaptability, or limited distribution. William 0. Cooper (citrus fruits), Derek Cormack The major fruits are not all well known. Some excellent (arrangements for review in Africa), Milton de Albu- fruits which rival the commercialized greatest are still querque (Brazilian fruits), Enriquito D. -
BIO-221 Comparative Anatomy
Bergen Community College Division of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Department of Biology and Horticulture Comparative Anatomy (BIO-221) General Course Syllabus Spring 2016 Course Title: Comparative Anatomy (BIO-221) Course Description: This course is a study of the body structures of some representative vertebrate animals and of their functional and evolutionary relationships. Laboratory exercises include detailed dissection of the Lamprey eel, the dogfish shark, the mud puppy, the cat and other animals. Prerequisites: BIO-101 General Biology I, BIO-203 General Biology II General Education No Course: Course Credits; 4.0 Hours per week: 6.0: 3 hours lecture and 3 hours lab Course Coordinator: Robert Dill Required Lecture Comparative Anatomy of the Vertebrates, Kent, George, C.V. Mosby Co., 9th Edition ISBN 0-07-303869-5 Textbook: Required Laboratory Atlas and Dissection Guide for Comparative Anatomy, Wischinitzer, Saul W. H. Freeman Co. Publisher, 6th. Ed. 2007 ISBN 9780716769590 Manual: Student Learning Objectives: The student will be able to: 1. Identify the basic concepts in comparative vertebrate anatomy and explain basic vertebrate characteristics. Assessment will be based on exam questions. 2. Identify and explain the anatomy and niche of the protochordates. Assessment will be based on exam questions. 3. Identify the major vertebrate groups and discuss the relationship between them. Assessment will be based on exam questions. 4. Identify the parts of the vertebrate integument and explain the relationship of this system between major vertebrate groups. Assessment will be based on exam questions. 5. Identify the parts of the vertebrate skeletal and explain the relationship of this system between major vertebrate groups. -
Adaptive Radiation: Mammalian Forelimbs
ADAPTIVE RADIATION: MAMMALIAN FORELIMBS The variety of forelimbs - the bat's wing, the sea lion's flipper, the elephant's supportive column, the human's arm and hand - further illustrates the similar anatomical plan of all mammals due to a shared ancestry. Despite the obvious differences in shape, mammalian forelimbs share a similar arrangement and arise from the same embryonic, homologous structures. The mammalian forelimb includes the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints. The scapula or shoul- der blade connects the forelimb to the trunk and forms part of the shoulder joint. The humerus or upper arm bone forms part of the shoulder joint above, and elbow joint below. The radius and ulna comprise the lower arm bones or forearm, and contribute to the elbow and wrist joints. Finally, the carpal or wrist bones, the metacarpals, and phalanges form the bat wing, the sea lion flipper, the tree shrew, mole, and wolf paws, the elephant foot, and the human hand and fingers. Using light colors, begin with the tree shrew scapula in the center of the plate. Next, color the scapula on each of the other animals: the mole, bat, wolf, sea lion, elephant, and human. Continue coloring the other bones in this manner: humerus, radius, ulna, carpal bones, metacarpals, and phalanges. After you have colored all the structures in each animal, notice the variation in the overall shape of the forelimb. Notice, too, how the form of the bones contributes to the function of the forelimb in each species. The tree shrew skeleton closely resembles that of early mammals and represents the ancestral forelimb skeleton. -
Technical Expert Meeting on the Global Strategy For
CBD Distr. CONVENTION ON GENERAL UNEP/CBD/GSPC/1/4 BIOLOGICAL Date: 28 January 2002 DIVERSITY ORIGINAL: ENGLISH TECHNICAL EXPERT ON THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 11-13 February 2002 REVIEW OF EXISTING NATIONALLY-BASED INITIATIVES THAT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION AT NATIONAL LEVELS REVIEW OF EXISTING NATIONALLY-BASED INITIATIVES THAT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION AT NATIONAL LEVELS This paper has been compiled and edited by Judith Cheney, Fiona Dennis, Chris Hobson, Etelka Leadlay and Peter Wyse Jackson, for Botanic Gard ens Conservation International, with the support of the Convention on Biological Diversity Secretariat. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. REVIEW OF EXISTING NATIONALLY-BASED ACTIVITIES THAT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF A GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION I. INTRODUCTION 1. The decision V/10 of the COP to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) noted the importance of plants for humankind, the threats they are facing, and a recent call for developing a global strategy for plant conservation contained within the Gran Canaria Declaration (REF). The decision also recognized that there are ongoing international initiatives that should contribute to developing such a strategy. It requests the Executive Secretary to liaise with these existing initiatives and requested the Subsidiary Body for Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) to examine the issue. 2. In furtherance of the decision V/10 to consider the possible establishment of a global strategy for plant conservation, two informal consultations were convened by the Secretariat of the CBD in March and May, 2001, attended by representatives of intergovernmental and non- governmental organisations of relevance to plant conservation.