DOCSLIB.ORG

Sfilt-Background-Paper-17-Regional

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sfilt-Background-Paper-17-Regional Investing In Our Transport Future: A Strategic Framework for Investment in Land Transport Background Paper Seventeen Regional Breakdown of Road Expenditure Issued by: Economic and Financial Evaluation Unit Department Of Transport, Tourism and Sport Leeson Lane Dublin 2 Ireland Research Note Regional Breakdown of Road Expenditure This research note serves as a regional analysis of expenditure on the Irish road system. It details spending per km and per capita for each county. It also introduces similar research carried out by Edgar Morgenroth at the ESRI. This analysis is provided in a series of figures below with all corresponding data listed in annex 2. 1. Work Done by EFEU 1.1 National Road Expenditure 2000-2014 The county breakdown of national road expenditure is detailed in figure 1. The analysis reveals that Dublin received the highest level of funding with Kildare in second place. The main drivers behind this trend were the higher cost of road projects in urban areas, the strategic nature of the road network in this area and the growing car demand that occurred in the Greater Dublin Area. For example, a number of major projects were completed in Dublin, Kildare, Kilkenny, Meath and Westmeath including the M50 motorway and upgrade, M1 and N7 road widening, the M4 bypass (PPP), the construction of the N6 between Kinnegad and Athlone and the N2 between Ashbourne and the M50. Figure 2 reveals the county distribution of the 2014 allocation for national roads. Counties such as Galway, Mayo, Roscommon and Wexford feature highly with relatively large allocations for 2014 due to on-going projects. PPP payments for the N6 between Athlone and Ballinasloe and planning costs for a number of projects including the N6 Galway City Bypass, N18/N17 Gort to Tuam PPP scheme and the N59 Moycullen Bypass are all examples of major projects which have contributed to the higher expenditure level in Galway. Mayo, Roscommon and Wexford also had significant projects in 2014 which contributed to their increased levels of allocation. Figure 1 National Road Expenditure: 2000-2013 3,000 2,500 Millions 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Cork Sligo Laois Clare Kerry Mayo Louth Offaly Cavan Dublin Meath Kildare Carlow Leitrim Galway Donegal Limerick Kilkenny Wicklow Wexford Longford Tipperary Waterford Monaghan Westmeath Roscommon Figure 3 projects within a needs and county. higher levels of funding. The expenditure level for any one expenditure year with is certain dri counties, including Wexford, Roscommon and Galway, receiving GDA. Figure 4 shows that for the 2014 allocation there is a relatively nature of theeven roads for distribution the national economy of and the swell in car demand witnessed before, the main drivers of this were the extra cost of projects in urban areas, the strategic expenditure in national roads. Between 2000 and 2013 the amount spent per Km in Dublin far outstripped Figures 3 and 4 detail a per Km analysis which shows how much counties spent per Km on Figure 2 Millions Millions 10 12 14 16 18 20 10 15 20 25 - 2 4 6 8 0 5 National Road Expenditure Per Km: 2000 Km: Per Expenditure Road National Carlow Carlow 2014 Allocation Expenditure: Road National Cavan other counties with Kildare also having a relatively high level. As mentioned Cavan Clare Clare Cork Cork Donegal Donegal Dublin Dublin Galway Galway Kerry Kerry Kildare Kildare Kilkenny Kilkenny Laois Laois Leitrim Leitrim Limerick Limerick Longford Longford Louth Louth Mayo Mayo Meath Meath Monaghan Monaghan Offaly Offaly Roscommon Roscommon ven ven by the current - Sligo 2013 Sligo Tipperary Tipperary Waterford Waterford Westmeath Westmeath Wexford in the Wexford Wicklow Wicklow Figure 5 hub. its as economic role an key km basis, this is justified by its much larger population with that listed above, shows that while Dublin receives a high level construction of key strategic routes in these less populated regionally spread allocation areas. with Kilkenny and Westmeath receiving higher levels due This to the analysis, coupled a populations. m much reveals for countyThe analysis data census performed 2011 using Figures 5 and 6 detail a per capita analysis of national road expenditure. This analysis is Figure 4 10,000 12,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Thousands - 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 - Carlow National Road Expenditure Per Capita: 2000 Capita: Per Expenditure Road National Carlow Cavan Cavan 2014 Km: Per Expenditure Road National Clare Clare Cork Cork Donegal Donegal Dublin Dublin Galway Galway Kerry Kerry Kildare Kildare Allocation Kilkenny Kilkenny Laois 2013 Laois Leitrim Leitrim Limerick Limerick Longford Longford - Louth which drives increase demand Louth Mayo Mayo Meath Meath Monaghan Monaghan Offaly of expenditure on a per Offaly Roscommon Roscommon Sligo Sligo Tipperary Tipperary - Waterford Waterford Westmeath Westmeath - Wexford Wexford and ore ore Wicklow Wicklow Figure 7 above. the factors by outlined this driven and is of funding the main recipients county breakdown of the 2014 R&L road expenditure allocation. Again, Cork and Dublin are nature of these roads This is mainly driven by the length of the road network in these counties and the strategic presented in Figure 7. Dublin and Cork stand out as the highest recipients of expenditure. The county breakdown of regio 2000 Expenditure Road 1.2and Local Regional Figure 6 100 150 200 250 300 50 - Millions 1,000 1,200 1,400 200 400 600 800 - Carlow Cavan 2014 Capita: Per Expenditure Road National Carlow Clare Cavan Cork Clare 2000 Expenditure: Road R&L Donegal Cork for national, regional and local economies. Figure 8 displays the Dublin Donegal Galway Dublin Kerry Galway nal and local expenditure between 2000 and 2013 is Kerry Kildare Kildare Kilkenny Allocation Kilkenny Laois Laois Leitrim - Leitrim 2014 Limerick Limerick Longford Longford Louth Louth Mayo Mayo Meath Meath - Monaghan Monaghan 2013 Offaly Offaly Roscommon Roscommon Sligo Sligo Tipperary Tipperary Waterford Waterford Westmeath Westmeath Wexford Wexford Wicklow Wicklow Figure 9 urba and demand use, of road level the network higher and other counties. Again, this is driven by that the in 2014 strategic the allocation nature was relatively of flat with Dublin this and Kildare section receiving more of than exception of Dublin and the Kildare which received a higher road per Km allocation. Between 2000 and 2013 we see on on the per Km Figures roads inbasis. R&L and of expenditure a display 10 9 counties level a relatively flat distribution across counties with the Figure 8 Thousands Millions 100 150 200 250 300 350 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 - 50 - Carlow Carlow 2000 Km: Per Expenditure Road R&L Cavan Cavan 2014 Allocation Expenditure: Road R&L Clare Clare Cork Cork Donegal Donegal Dublin Dublin Galway Galway Kerry Kerry Kildare Kildare Kilkenny Kilkenny Laois Laois Leitrim Leitrim Limerick Limerick Longford Longford Louth Louth Mayo Mayo n costs. Meath Meath Monaghan Monaghan Offaly Offaly - Roscommon 2013 Roscommon Sligo Sligo Tipperary Figure 10 shows Tipperary Waterford Waterford Westmeath Westmeath Wexford Wexford Wicklow Wicklow Figure 11 level. expenditure higher per a capita totendthrough them get allocation. Once again, less populated that Dublin large counties population which have a partstrategic of the route expenditure. However, the running per capita analysis, using 2011 census data, fashion to shows national roads, the per km analysis seemed to show Dublin receiving a very large Figures 11 and 12 display an analysis of R& Figure 10 Thousands Thousands - 10 12 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 - 2 4 6 8 R&L Road Expenditure Per Km: 2014 Allocation Km: Per Expenditure Road R&L Carlow 2000 Capita: Per Expenditure Road R&L Carlow Cavan Cavan Clare Clare Cork Cork Donegal Donegal Dublin Dublin , and thus high road demand, is at the heart of its expenditure Galway Galway Kerry Kerry Kildare Kildare Kilkenny Kilkenny Laois Laois Leitrim L spending on a per capita basis. In a similar Leitrim Limerick Limerick Longford Longford Louth Louth Mayo Mayo Meath Meath Monaghan Monaghan Offaly Offaly Roscommon Roscommon - Sligo 2013 Sligo Tipperary Tipperary Waterford Waterford Westmeath Westmeath Wexford Wexford Wicklow Wicklow Figure 12 R&L Road Expenditure Per Capita: 2014 Allocation 250 200 150 100 50 - Cork Sligo Laois Clare Kerry Mayo Louth Offaly Cavan Dublin Meath Kildare Carlow Leitrim Galway Donegal Limerick Kilkenny Wicklow Wexford Longford Tipperary Waterford Monaghan Westmeath Roscommon 1.2.1 Notional Steady State Expenditure on Regional and Local Roads As part of the Strategic Framework for Investment in Land Transport, the EFEU compiled a necessary level of steady state expenditure to maintain the transport system at its current condition. This amounted to €1.6 billion, with a total €1.3 billion exchequer funding requirement. As part of its analysis, EFEU completed a hypothetical breakdown by county of the steady state expenditure required for the Irish regional and local road network. The hypothetical breakdown was based on the application of unit rates for different types of maintenance to different categories of regional and local roads1. The result of this analysis is displayed in Figure 13 below. This analysis reveals that Cork will require the largest amount of steady state expenditure while counties such as Carlow, Laois and Longford will have a relatively small expenditure need. The disparities in expenditure requirements are driven by the varying lengths of road network that exist within each county. Cork is the county with the most kilometres - 12,298km and Carlow is the county with the least – 1,194km. In addition, road projects which have already been committed to in different counties contribute to this breakdown. Finally, just as road length impact expenditure needs, road type is also a significant driver with urban R&L roads being much more expensive to maintain on a unit basis than rural R&L roads.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Killeisk-Journal.Pdf
    Eachtra Journal Issue 11 [ISSN 2009-2237] Archaeological Excavation Report E3587 - Killeisk, Co. Tipperary Early Bronze Age pits, medieval enclosure and associated field enclosures EACHTRA Archaeological Projects Archaeological Excavation Report Killeisk Co. Tipperary Early Bronze Age pits, medieval enclosure and associated field enclosures Date: December 2011 Client: Laois County Council and National Roads Authority Project: N7 Castletown to Nenagh (Contract 1) E No: E3587 Excavation Director: Simon O'Faolain Written by: Simon O'Faolain Archaeological Excavation Report Killeisk Co. Tipperary Excavation Director Simon O'Faolain Written By Simon O'Faolain EACHTRA Archaeological Projects CORK GALWAY The Forge, Innishannon, Co. Cork Unit 10, Kilkerrin Park, Liosbain Industrial Estate, Galway tel: 021 4701616 | web: www.eachtra.ie | email: [email protected] tel: 091 763673 | web: www.eachtra.ie | email: [email protected] © Eachtra Archaeological Projects 2011 The Forge, Innishannon, Co Cork Set in 12pt Garamond Printed in Ireland Table of Contents Summary���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 Acknowledgements���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 1 Scope of the project �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 2 Route location���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Eachtra Journal
    Eachtra Journal Issue 11 [ISSN 2009-2237] Archaeological Excavation Report E3659 - Park 1, Co. Tipperary Prehistoric activity and Medieval settlement site EACHTRA Archaeological Projects Archaeological Excavation Report Park 1 Co. Tipperary Prehistoric activity and Medieval settlement site Date: December 2011 Client: Laois County Council and National Roads Authority Project: N7 Castletown to Nenagh (Contract 1) E No: E3659 Excavation Director: Gerry Mullins Written by: Gerry Mullins Archaeological Excavation Report Park 1 Co. Tipperary Excavation Director Gerry Mullins Written By Gerry Mullins EACHTRA Archaeological Projects CORK GALWAY The Forge, Innishannon, Co. Cork Unit 10, Kilkerrin Park, Liosbain Industrial Estate, Galway tel: 021 4701616 | web: www.eachtra.ie | email: [email protected] tel: 091 763673 | web: www.eachtra.ie | email: [email protected] © Eachtra Archaeological Projects 2011 The Forge, Innishannon, Co Cork Set in 12pt Garamond Printed in Ireland Table of Contents Summary��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� v Acknowledgements��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������vi Scope of the project ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Route location ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • An Bord Pleanála ASSISTING INSPECTOR's REPORT TO
    An Bord Pleanála Ref.: HA0045 / MA0012 An Bord Pleanála ASSISTING INSPECTOR’S REPORT TO SENIOR INSPECTOR NATURE AND PURPOSE OF REPORT: To inform the report of the Board’s Senior Inspector on traffic and transport issues arising, including the adequacy of baseline information, the assessment of the likely impacts on traffic and transportation and the appropriateness and validity of traffic modelling; the need for the scheme having regard to policy provision, the strategic function of the road and road safety; the alternatives investigated and detailed design issues having regard to relevant roads standards. Local Authority : Kildare County Council. Proposed scheme : Naas to Newbridge bypass upgrade and replacement Newhall interchange scheme. Dates of Site Inspection : 29/04/14, 08/05/14 and 15/05/14; Date of oral hearing : 23/05/14, 16/05/14 and 06/06/14 Inspector : John Desmond HA0045 / MA0012 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 71 Part A 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1.1 The application site, comprising those lands contained within the indicated boundary as ‘ lands made available ’ in drawings figure 4.2 to figure .4.10, inclusive, of EIS Volume 3, encompasses approximately 13.6km length of the M7 / N7, extending between junction 8 Johnstown Interchange, to the east/north, and junction 11 Great Connell, between M7/M9, to the west/south. 1.2 The site encompasses junction 11 Great Connell; c.1km of the R445 (Newbridge to Naas road) including its over-bridge of the M7; junction 10 Newhall Interchange, including its over-bridge of the M7, two direct M7 off- slips and one direct M7 merge lane; an indirect M7 merge lane from the Newhall Interchange via the Bundle of Sticks roundabout on R445/L2030, including an intervening section of Due Way Road (local road, unnumbered); a section of unnamed / unnumbered local road (from the direction of Newtown townland) connecting at the junction of the local road (from Bundle of Sticks) and the M7 Newhall westbound merge.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Particulars of Proposed Scheme to Be Made Available for Public Title Display
    Kildare County Council ----- R445 Newhall Junction Improvement Scheme ----- REPORT OF PARTICULARS OF PROPOSED SCHEME TO BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC DISPLAY (In accordance with Section 179 3(b) of the Planning and Development Acts, 2000 – 2017 and Part 8 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 – 2017) Kildare County Council Kilgallen & Partners Aras an Chontae Consulting Engineers Devoy Park Well Road, Portlaoise Naas W91 X77F Co. Laois 19041 C-R-P8 Issue 01 Kildare County Council Kilgallen and Partners R445 Newhall Junction Improvement Scheme REVISION HISTORY Client Kildare County Council Scheme R445 Newhall Junction Improvement Scheme Report of Particulars of Proposed Scheme to be made available for Public Title Display Date Details of issue Issue No. Origin Checked Approved 08/04/21 Part 8 01 PB MK MK Report of Particulars of Proposed Scheme to be made available for Public Display Doc.Ref.19041 C-R-P8 Issue 01 Page | ii Kildare County Council Kilgallen and Partners R445 Newhall Junction Improvement Scheme TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Need For Scheme 2 2.1 Description of existing Newhall Crossroads .............................................................................. 2 2.2 Collision History ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Garda Traffic Division ............................................................................................................ 5 2.4 Traffic Survey .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Noise and Vibration
    Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) Volume 2 of 4: Main Report 8. Noise and Vibration This Chapter assesses the potential noise and vibration impacts which may be generated during the Remediation and Operational Phases of the proposed Project. The principal Remediation Phase noise and vibration impacts will be associated with machinery use, excavation, demolition of walls and construction of landfill management infrastructure, while Operational Phase noise and vibration impacts are anticipated to be insignificant following completion of the remediation programme. Noise levels will vary throughout the Remediation Phase with a range of noise generating activities involved in the remediation works phase. Noise modelling has been completed for a set of conservative scenarios to account for all significant noise generating activities and has shown that the noise criteria can be met. The entire remediation programme has been assessed as being short- term in duration with a moderate significance in terms of over-all impact. Traffic noise impacts have been assessed as moderate and within the adopted noise criteria. The results of the Operational Phase noise assessment indicate that the operation of the proposed Project will make no measurable change to the prevailing daytime, evening time and night time ambient noise environment. The predicted increase in operational traffic noise at the Noise Sensitive Receptors is anticipated to be barely perceptible and the associated noise impact is classified as negligible. A range of best practice noise management measures will be employed to mitigate any potential noise disturbance during the Remediation Phase. As the noise impact assessment has shown there are no adverse noise impacts associated with the Operational Phase of the proposed Project and mitigation measures are not required during the operation of the multi-use public park.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Newlands Manor Court Clondalkin Dublin 22 D22K0E9 for SALE
    FOR SALE BY PRIVATE TREATY 8 Newlands Manor Court Clondalkin Dublin 22 D22K0E9 Three Bedroom Duplex c.106sq.m / 1,140.97 sq.ft Price: €295,000 raycooke.ie PSR Licence Number 002307 DESCRIPTION FEATURES RAY COOKE AUCTIONEERS are excited to present Mgt fee - €969 per annum this stunning three-bedroom duplex to the market BER - B2 in the exclusive €oeewlands Manor€ development. With a secure gated entrance and picturesque views c. 1145 sq. ft of the bordering Corkagh Park, the development Gas Fired Central Heating consistently maintains its prestige status and is highly Semi Solid Hard wood flooring throughout ground floor sought after. Clondalkin Village can be found within Pristine condition walking distance and within arm€TM reach you will Double Glazed Windows find a host of bus routes to and from Dublin€TM City Centre, the Luas, the M50 Motorway and the Fully fitted kitchen with stove cooker N7. Bright and spacious living accommodation of 3 large spacious rooms 1145 sq.ft comprises of entrance hall, guest W.C., Prime opportunity for 4th bedroom within the attic kitchen with dining area, large lounge with balcony, space three double bedrooms, main family bathroom, an Private gated development en-suite and the added bonus of a large attic that can Private access to Corkage park be converted into a 4th bedroom (plans available on request). No. 8 is presented in beautiful condition Within easy reach of The M50 & N7 road networks throughout and is sure to cause a stir among a wide Bus routes to the front of the development range of 1st time buyers and investors alike.
    [Show full text]
  • N7 Nenagh to Limerick High Quality Dual Carriageway Archaeological Resolution Project Annaholty Site 4, E2312, Co
    N7 Nenagh to Limerick High Quality Dual Carriageway Archaeological Resolution Project Annaholty Site 4, E2312, Co. Tipperary Final Excavation Report Author: Nial O’Neill with contributions by Maura O’Malley and Heidi Jacobsen Director: Liam McKinstry Site Chainage Ordnance Datum NGR Annaholty Site 4 8300 49.59 169265/164764 Date: August 2009 Client: Limerick County Council Headland Project Code: NNL06 Townland: Annaholty Parish: Kilcomenty Barony: Owney & Arra OS 6” Sheet No: TN‐031 Report Status: Approved N7 Nenagh to Limerick High Quality Dual Carriageway Archaeological Resolution Project Annaholty Site 4, E2312, Co. Tipperary Final Excavation Report Author: Nial O’Neill with contributions by Maura O’Malley and Heidi Jacobsen Director: Liam McKinstry Site Chainage Ordnance Datum NGR Annaholty Site 4 8300 49.59 169265/164764 Date: August 2009 Client: Limerick County Council Headland Project Code: NNL06 Townland: Annaholty Parish: Kilcomenty Barony: Owney & Arra OS 6” Sheet No: TN‐031 Report Status: Approved Headland Archaeology Ltd: N7 Nenagh to Limerick HQDC E2312, Annaholty Site 4 Final Report CONTENTS PAGE Executive Summary 3 1 Introduction 4 2 Site description and location 4 3 Historical and archaeological background 4 4 Aims and methodology 7 5 Excavation results 8 6 Discussion 9 7 Conclusion 14 8 Archive quantities 15 References 16 Acknowledgements 18 List of Figures 1 Location of Annaholty Site 4, E2312 2 Location of Annaholty Site 4, E2312 on RMP extract 3 E2312 Layout of site 4 Plan and southeast‐facing section of probable trough
    [Show full text]
  • Newlands Cross Upgrade EIS
    Newlands Cross Upgrade EIS December 2007 Kildare South Dublin County Council County Council South Dublin County Council N7 Newlands Cross Upgrade Environmental Impact Statement December 2007 Arup Consulting Engineers 50 Ringsend Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 Tel +353 1 233 4455 Fax +353 1 668 3169 www.arup.ie Job number D 4556/11 South Dublin County Council N7 Newlands Cross Upgrade Environmental Impact Statement PREFACE The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Newlands Cross Upgrade consists of the following documents: Non Technical Summary Environmental Impact Statement (Main Text) including Non-Technical Summary and Appendices ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared by Arup consulting Engineers and their specialist environmental sub-consultants for South Dublin County Council. The assessment team draw primarily on in-house resources in traffic; construction activities; geology; soils; groundwater; air quality; climate; surface water and drainage; material assets and utilities. Specialist technical contribution was provided in: Archaeology, Architecture and Cultural Heritage by Margaret Gowen and Co. Ltd. Ecological Assessment by Natura Environmental Consultants Golf Design by Spring Golf Design Landscape and Visual by Mitchell and Associates Noise and Vibration by AWN Consulting Ltd. Photomontages by Modelworks Socio-Economic Assessment by Optimize EIS DISPLAY LOCATIONS Members of the public may inspect copies of the EIS document, including the Non-Technical Summary during normal office hours at the following location: South Dublin County Council Kildare County Council County Hall Aras Chill Dara Town Centre Devoy Park Tallaght Naas Dublin 24 Co. Kildare SDCC Clondalkin Civic Centre Kildare County Council Clondalkin Village National Roads Design Office Dublin 22 Maudlins Naas Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Optimised Surrogate Version of This Individual Asset
    N7 CASTLETOWN TO NENAGH ROAD IMPROVEMENT SCHEME CONTRACT 2 (DERRINSALLAGH TO BALLINTOTTY): ADVANCE ARCHAEOLOGICAL WORKS PHASE 3: ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS Final report Ballykelly 2, Co. Tipperary Excavation Number E3905 Archaeological Consultancy: Valerie J Keeley Ltd, Brehon House, Kilkenny Road, Castlecomer, Co Kilkenny Senior Archaeologist: Colm Flynn Excavation Director: Sinéad Marshall Final Report Author: Paul Stevens Date: APRIL 2011 N7 Castletown-Nenagh (Derrinsallagh-Ballintotty) Road Improvement Scheme Advance Archaeological Works, Direction No. A038 Contract 2, Phase 3 Final Report Ballykelly 2, Excavation No. E3905 Ballykelly 2 in the foreground - centre right, Borris-in-Ossory in the background. Looking northeast Project name: N7 Castletown to Nenagh (Derrinsallagh to Ballintotty) Road Improvement Scheme Contract 2 (Derrinsallagh to Castleroan) Client: Laois County Council Direction number: A038 Site Name: Ballykelly 2 Excavation Number: E3905 Townland: Ballykelly, Co Tipperary Parish: Bourney OS 6 inch sheet: TN18 National Grid Ref: 222381/185591 to 222543/185675 Chainage: 33.100 – 33.300 SMR Reference: None Report type: Final Report Report Status: Draft Report Archaeological Consultancy: Valerie J Keeley Ltd, Brehon House, Kilkenny Road, Castlecomer, Co Kilkenny Job Number: 1310-06-300 Senior Archaeologist: Eamonn Cotter Excavation Director: Sinéad Marshall Report Author: Paul Stevens Date: APRIL 2011 SUMMARY Valerie J Keeley Ltd was commissioned by Laois County Council and the National Roads Authority to undertake archaeological works along 18.1km (Contract 2) of the 35km long N7 Castletown to Nenagh (Derrinsallagh to Ballintotty) Road Improvement Scheme (EIS approved in November 2005). The scheme runs from the eastern junction of the present N7 Nenagh Bypass Co Tipperary and ties in with the M7/M8 Portlaoise-Castletown scheme to the south of Borris-in-Ossory in Co Laois.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Do Not Form Any Part of Any Offer Or Contract and Are for Guidance Only
    Village Living A home in Crosforge Close offers all the benefits of village living with a host of shops and amenities on your doorstep. A wide variety of neighbourhood shops are located along the main street with a large ‘Avoca’ food market and café just a five minute walk away. Citywest Shopping Centre and Citywest Business Park are both located within a five minute drive of Crosforge Close. The shopping centre offers a wide variety of retailers including Dunnes Stores, McCabe’s Pharmacy, Costa Coffee and Lifestyle Sports to name but a few. Citywest Business Park is home to some of the world’s largest companies with Sony, Unilever, Adobe and Pfizer all having a presence in the Park. Crosforge Close benefits from excellent transport links. Saggart Luas stop is a five minute walk from the development, whilst the N7 road network - giving access to the M50 and beyond - is within immediate access to the development. Avoca at Rathcoole Saggart Village Quality New Homes • Anthony Neville Homes Ltd take pride in achieving the highest standards of energy efficiency and attention to detail • Proven track record having completed many successful developments in both Ireland and the UK • Unparalleled standard specification • Concrete block built homes • 10 Year Homebond Structural Guarantee Citywest Business Campus Saggart Luas Stop Computer generated image for illustrative purpose only and subject to change Special Features - Exterior • A-Rated, energy efficient construction • Solar PV Panels • Extensive natural stone cladding • Low maintenance
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Demand
    Transport Demand November, 2000 Goodbody Economic Consultants Ballsbridge Park, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 Tel: 353-1-641-0482 Fax: 353-1-668-2388 www.goodbody.ie e-mail – [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary . 5 Freight Traffic: Modal Shares and Spatial Distribution 5 Passenger Traffic: Modal Shares and Spatial Distribution 5 National Car Ownership Forecasts 6 Regional and County Car Ownership Forecasts 7 Travel Forecasts 7 Policy Implications 8 1 Introduction . 9 2 Freight Traffic: Modal Shares and Spatial Distribution . 11 2.1 Introduction . 11 2.2 Data Sources . 11 2.3 Estimating Modal Shares . 12 2.4 Spatial Distribution of Freight Traffic . 14 2.5 Conclusions . 21 3 Passenger Traffic: Modal Shares and Spatial Distribution . 23 3.1 Introduction . 23 3.2 Methodology . 23 3.3 Passenger Traffic Mode Shares . 24 3.4 The Spatial Distribution of Passenger Traffic . 27 3.5 Conclusions . 35 4National Car Ownership Forecasts . 37 4.1 Introduction . 37 4.2 Recent Trends in Car Ownership . 37 4.3 Saturation Levels . 38 4.4 Factors Influencing Car Ownership Levels . 38 4.5 The Forecasting Model . 39 4.6 Forecast Assumptions . 40 4.7 Forecasts of Car Numbers . 42 5 Regional and County Car Ownership Forecasts . 43 3 5.1 Introduction . 43 5.2 Trends in Regional and County Car Ownership Levels . 43 5.3 Forecasting Methodology . 45 5.4 Model Estimation . 47 5.5 Forecast Assumptions . .47 5.6 Regional and County Car Ownership Forecasts . 48 5.7 Forecasts of Car Numbers by County . 50 6 Travel Forecasts . 53 6.1 Car Travel Forecasts .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F Water Treatment Plant Site Selection
    Water Supply Project Eastern and Midlands Region Appendix F Water Treatment Plant Site Selection Water Supply Project, Eastern and Midlands Region Irish Water Final Options Appraisal Report – Non Linear Infrastructure Siting Appendix F Water Treatment Plant Site Selection November 2016 Final Options Appraisal Report Irish Water Final Options Appraisal Report Appendix F Water Treatment Plant Site Selection Contents 1. Water Treatment Plant Siting – Process Summary ................................................................................ 1 2. Screening to Identify Preliminary Sites................................................................................................. 22 3. WTP Site 1 ................................................................................................................................................ 26 4. WTP Site 2 ................................................................................................................................................ 30 5. WTP Site 3 ................................................................................................................................................ 35 6. WTP Sites – MCA Comparison ............................................................................................................... 39 161028WSP1_FOAR Appendix F i Final Options Appraisal Report Appendix F Water Treatment Plant Site Selection 1. Water Treatment Plant Siting – Process Summary Option C (Parteen Basin Reservoir Direct) has been confirmed as the Preferred
    [Show full text]