DOCSLIB.ORG

Japan's Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama Resigned

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Japan's Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama Resigned 3 giugno 2010 Japan’s Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama resigned Axel Berkofsky(*) Yukio Hatoyama whose Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) won a landslide general elections victory over the incumbent Liberal-Democratic Party (LDP) 9 months ago announced to resign yesterday citing his failure to resolve a dispute over a US military base relocation agreement and party fund- ing scandals involving himself and several other party friends and foes. Hatoyama is the fourth Prime Minister to resign in four years (all of whom stayed in office for only a year or less). With him resigned controversial and powerful DPJ Secretary-General Ichiro Ozawa who, as Kyodo News reported, already last week gave the inner-party go-ahead to replace the incumbent Prime Minister. Hatoyama replied by asking Ozawa to thrown in the towel as well as part of the pretty much busi- ness-as-usual inner-party-sponsored ousting of a Japanese Prime Minister. Hatoyama’s coalition government was off a for a bad start from the very beginning, not least be- cause the DPJ’s junior coalition partners (the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and the New People’s Party, both of which were only invited to join the coalition to keep them from blocking lawmaking in the Upper House where the DPJ lacks an absolute majority) supported very little (if anything) on the DPJ’s policy agenda. What’s more, the SDP threatened very early on to leave the coalition should Hatoyama decide not to keep his promise to reduce US military presence on Okinawa. It just that last week after Hatoyama’s announcement to stick with the existing 2006 US-Japan base re-location agreement to move the US Marine Corps Air Station Futenma from densely populated southern to northern Okinawa. To be sure, Hatoyama should have thought more thoroughly carefully about where to re-locate the US base to before announcing to revise the troops re-location agreement, but he should be given credit to try to do for a few months what all his post-war predecessors did not do before him: Resist Washington’s pressure as regards US military presence and burden on Okinawa. Unfortunately for Hatoyama and his government, the proposals made by Hatoyama and some his ministers on where to re-locate the base to were all unrealistic and unacceptable to either the US or local government authorities (inside and later outside of Okinawa) asked to host the base in their constituencies. Sure enough, Washington was never really willing to consider changes to the existing base re- location agreement and has made that very in numerous bilateral encounters over recent months. Japan’s two biggest newspapers, The Yomiuri Shimbun and The Asahi Shimbun (which sell 11 and 10 million copies per day respectively) for their part covered Hatoyama’s difficulties and mis- haps with great enthusiasm and at times indeed schadenfreude. In fact, publishing daily reports on Hatoyama’s shrinking public approval rates and excessively focusing on the Prime Minister’s problems with the US base re-location issue and inner-party fi- nancial scandals left very little space for coverage on what the government has achieved over the last eight months. (*) Axel Berkofsky is Senior Associate Research Fellow, ISPI. 2 ISPI - Commentary Admittedly, that list is not very long, but Hatoyama was (as he promised on the election campaign trail) able to exclude the ministerial bureaucracy from cabinet meetings (which over decades stood for much of what was very wrong with Japanese democracy), increase monthly child allowance payments and introduce tuition-free high schools. What is next? The DPJ will present a new Cabinet next Monday and Japan’s current Finance Minister Naoto Kan is the frontrunner to head it as new party boss and Prime Minister. Kan earned himself a reputation for toughness and courage when he as health minister took on the ministerial bureaucracy over an HIV-tainted blood products scandal in the mid-1990s. And courage is probably what the DPJ needs now with the upcoming Upper House elections (with half of the 242 Upper House seats contested) scheduled to take place on July 11. The DPJ’s plan was (or still is) to win an absolute majority in the Upper House to govern without difficult coalition partners-now most likely an overambitious goal, unless the results of all recent Upper House elec- tion-related opinion polls turn out to be wrong. Should that not be the case (which is very likely), Tokyo-based analyst Takeo Toshikawa reckons, the DPJ might choose to look for new (and less trouble-making) coalition partners such as the New Komeito Party to make sure that DPJ-proposal bills get passed in the Upper House after July 11. La ricerca ISPI analizza le Fortunately, for the DPJ, the Japanese electorate does not have a dinamiche politiche, strate- great deal of attractive alternatives to choose from on July 11. giche ed economiche del sistema internazionale con il The LDP, the country’s biggest opposition party, is plagued by in- duplice obiettivo di informa- fighting and defections with several party heavyweights regularly re e di orientare le scelte di announcing to leave the party and establish new political group and policy. parties. Recent months have indeed been difficult for the once mighty catch-all LDP which practically governed Japan (with a 11- I risultati della ricerca ven- gono divulgati attraverso month interruption from 1993/1994) from 1955 until 2009. pubblicazioni ed eventi, However, even if the LDP was over the last eight months unable to focalizzati su tematiche di make any political capital of the DPJ’s shrinking popularity and pol- particolare interesse per icy failures, recent opinion polls suggest that a growing number of l’Italia e le sue relazioni in- ternazionali. voters might nonetheless but willing to return voting for them. That is remarkable in view of the near-absence of a credible and visible ISPI profile as the country’s biggest opposition party and the fact the Palazzo Clerici LDP lost more than 60 per cent of its Lower House seats after the Via Clerici, 5 general election last September I - 20121 Milano www.ispionline.it To be sure, the LDP will not win the elections, but the fact that parts of Japan’s electorate which ended LDP-led “one-party democracy” in Japan so decisively last September is again willing to give its vote © ISPI 2010 to the LDP, says quite a lot about the (high) level of dissatisfaction and disillusion amongst Japan’s voters with the DPJ-led govern- ment. The opinions expressed Japan’s new Prime Minister (possibly Naoto Kan but also Foreign herein are strictly personal Minister Katsuya Okada is reportedly interested in the job) will and do not necessarily probably spend the coming weeks to regain some of that lost trust reflect the position of ISPI. and speak to a few smaller parties and potential coalition partners. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Changing Nature of Bureaucracy and Governing Structure in Japan
    Washington International Law Journal Volume 28 Number 2 4-1-2019 The Changing Nature of Bureaucracy and Governing Structure in Japan Mayu Terada Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, President/Executive Department Commons, and the Public Law and Legal Theory Commons Recommended Citation Mayu Terada, The Changing Nature of Bureaucracy and Governing Structure in Japan, 28 Wash. L. Rev. 431 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol28/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington International Law Journal by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Compilation © 2019 Washington International Law Journal Association THE CHANGING NATURE OF BUREAUCRACY AND GOVERNING STRUCTURE IN JAPAN Mayu Terada* Abstract: This paper analyzes and criticizes changes in the relationship between politics and the bureaucracy, in Japan up to the present from the viewpoint of administrative organizations and related public law system. Drastic changes in the legal system, or legal reform, may sometimes undermine the true intention of the policy and its implementation. Thus, bringing political leadership in administrative decision-making bodies cannot be easily concluded as better or worse than the complete separation of administration and government. To analyze this matter in
    [Show full text]
  • From Rhetoric to Reality: Japanese Foreign-Policy Making Under The
    From Rhetoric to Reality Foreign-Policy Making under the Democratic Party of Japan April 2012 The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis From Rhetoric to Reality Foreign-Policy Making under the Democratic Party of Japan April 2012 Weston S. Konishi A publication of The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis Contents Introduction and Acknowledgments iii Executive Summary v Main Findings v From Rhetoric to Reality: Foreign-Policy Making under the Democratic Party of Japan 1 Internal Challenges 4 Intra-party Divisions 4 The Complexities of Coalition Politics 7 Institutional Reforms: Toward Politician-Led Decision-Making 11 The DPJ’s Foreign Policy: Competing Visions 15 Realists 16 Pacifists 17 Centrists 17 Neo-Autonomists 18 Caveats 20 Prime Minister Hatoyama: An Agenda for Change 23 External Constraints on the Hatoyama Administration 27 The Kan Administration: Political Transition and Crisis Management 30 The Noda Administration: Shifting to the Center? 40 Findings and Implications 45 The Impact of Structural Obstacles on DPJ Foreign-Policy Making 45 Continuity versus Change 46 The DPJ: A Hawkish Party? 47 Bilateralism vs. Multilateralism 49 Competing Schools of Thought 51 Conclusion 54 APPENDIX A: Impact of Major Events on Cabinet Approval Ratings 56 FROM RHETORIC TO REALITY I APPENDIX B: The 2010 NDPG Process 59 APPENDIX C: Survey Data of DPJ Foreign Policy Viewpoints 62 APPENDIX D: Profiles of Key DPJ Politicians 63 APPENDIX E: Chronology of Major Events under DPJ Governments 79 Bibliography 86 About the Author 103 II FROM RHETORIC TO REALITY Introduction and Acknowledgments After more than fifty years of one-party dom- ister Kan Naoto, presided over Japan’s most chal- inance under the Liberal Democratic Par- lenging crisis since World War II—the March ty (LDP), Japan’s political landscape changed 11, 2011, Great East Japan Earthquake—before dramatically with the victory of the Democratic succumbing to his own political fate as a result Party of Japan (DPJ) in parliamentary elections of his inconsistent leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan: the Quest for Political Leadership by Bert Edström
    Policy Brief No. 18, February 12, 2010 Japan: The Quest for Political Leadership by Bert Edström Six months have passed since the outcome of the general elections turned Japan’s political life upside down. The LDP lost after having been in power, almost without interruption, since its foundation in 1955. Japan’s new government under Yukio Hatoyama faces an uphill struggle. he outcome of the general election in Japan on member of the Diet (the Japanese parliament) since 1986. T August 39, 2009 resulted in political upheaval. The But it was true that he became the leader of the DPJ more seemingly eternally ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) or less by default in May 2009, when Ichiro Ozawa threw lost. It became the end of an era, where LDP rule had in the towel. Ozawa stepped down due to damage to his become synonymous with Japanese politics. Despite the reputation caused by accusations of scandal. It threatened problems that Japan had struggled with since the to derail the DPJ’s onslaught on the LDP in the upcoming beginning of the 1990s, the LDP continued to be in power election. It must be noted that Ozawa showed due to its formidable vote-getting capacity. But the party’s considerable stamina and resigned only when he basis in the electorate has eroded rapidly in recent years. concluded that the financial irregularities, which he was During the election campaign, Prime Minister Taro Aso accused of being involved in, would not cease to be a top asked voters to give the ruling party “another chance.” item on Japan’s political agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Under Prime Minister Hatoyama and the New Government – a Brief Overview of Key Players, Policies and Implications –
    Tokyo | September 1 7, 2009 CNC Info Letter Japan Under Prime Minister Hatoyama and The New Government – A Brief Overview of Key Players, Policies and Implications – by Jochen Legewie I STRUCTURE AND PLAYERS Hatoyama Profile: Between hereditary politician and bureaucratic maverick Yukio Hatoyama, 62, is a 4 th generation politician. His grandfather was Japan’s first prime minster from the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in 1954- 1956. Hatoyama was educated at Tokyo University and Stanford University, where he obtained his PhD in Engineering. He entered politics at the age of 39 after having worked at the famous Tokyo Institute of Technology. He has been nicknamed “The Alien” for his unorthodox manners and for being something of an outsider among traditional political circles. His soft- speaking manners make him very different from former maverick prime minister Junichiro Koizumi. Yukio Hatoyama The DPJ victory – Frustration with LDP overwhelming reason The figures send a clear message: In the lower house election on August 30, the LDP plummeted from 300 to 119 seats, while the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) increased their seats from 115 to 308 out of a total of 480 seats. This overwhelming victory, however, was less a vote of confidence in the DPJ than the result of over-boiling frustration with the LDP. Already 8 years ago the frustration of the people was strong. But running on the ticket of maverick Koizumi the LDP could hang on for two more election periods. During this time, the DPJ, founded in 1996, finally turned into a major opposition party and became the strongest political force in the upper house elections in July 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia and Japan in the 21St Century—The Decade of the 2000S
    This article was translated by JIIA from Japanese into English as part of a research project to promote academic studies on Japan’s diplomacy. JIIA takes full responsibility for the translation of this article. To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your personal use and research, please contact JIIA by e-mail ([email protected]). Citation: Japan’s Diplomacy Series, Japan Digital Library, http://www2.jiia.or.jp/en/digital_library/japan_s_diplomacy.php Asia and Japan in the 21st Century —The Decade of the 2000s* Taizo Miyagi Once characterized by war, conflict, and poverty, Asia had transformed itself into a region of remarkable economic growth and development by the end of the 20th century. This in fact was what Japan had hoped and striven for Asia throughout the postwar period. However, the emergence of China and other devel- opments have eclipsed Japan’s presence in Asia, so that Japan can no longer claim an unchallenged posi- tion even in economic matters. While 21st century Asia stands proud as the growth center for the world economy, there are undeniable signs that this region is becoming the stage for a new power game that is now unfolding. How is Japan to live and prosper in this environment? In the final analysis, the 21st cen- tury signifies the advent of a new age that can no longer be understood in terms of the “postwar” construct. I. The Koizumi Cabinet and Asia 1. Breaking Free of Conventional Wisdom with Bold Actions Before assuming the post of prime minister, Junichiro Koizumi was long considered to be a maverick within a Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) dominated by the Keiseikai Group (Takeshita Faction), which claimed the postal business lobby as a powerful source of support.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatoyama's Resignation and Japan's Foreign Policy
    Japan Center for International Exchange June 2010 Hatoyama’s Resignation and Japan’s Foreign Policy HITOSHI TANAKA, Senior Fellow, JCIE Less than nine months a!er he assumed o"ce in will remain the governing party. Further, Kan has an atmosphere of jubilation on the back of the retained many of the Hatoyama cabinet’s ministers. Democratic Party of Japan’s (DPJ) historic electoral 'erefore, few analysts expect any substantial policy victory over the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), changes as a result of this change at the top. However, Yukio Hatoyama fell from grace and resigned as the causes behind the fall of the Hatoyama govern- prime minister. Naoto Kan, the former #nance min- ment may have a far-reaching impact on future for- ister, was o"cially sworn into o"ce on June $ as the eign and national security policy. new prime minister of Japan. Hatoyama’s fumbling over the Futenma issue, and the money scandals Causes behind the Fall that hit both him and DPJ Secretary-General Ichiro While some analysts have focused on Hatoyama’s Ozawa, drove Hatoyama’s approval rating down rap- personality and his inability to deliver on promises, idly to as low as %& percent. With an Upper House there are two more critical reasons that explain his election looming large next month, this change of fall from the top job. government was motivated by the desire of the DPJ First, the Hatoyama government failed to formu- to take action against widely predicted heavy elec- late a solid foreign or national security policy. 'is toral losses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brookings Institution Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION CENTER FOR NORTHEAST ASIAN POLICY STUDIES WHITHER JAPAN? NEW CONSTITUTION AND DEFENSE BUILDUP Mr. Tomohiko Taniguchi CNAPS Japan Fellow, 2004-2005 May 2005 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036-2188 Tel: 202-797-6000 Fax: 202-797-6004 www.brookings.edu Contents Introduction Constitution Timeline Power dynamic in the Diet Article 9 Collective self-defense Areas of contention Defense Buildup Operation Enduring Freedom Operation Iraqi Freedom Missile Defense One could wonder why New Defense Thinking Security environment Multi-Functional Flexible Defense Force Tanks and fighter aircraft are passé An Asian equivalent of the United Kingdom? The China Factor U.S. emphasis on Asia Taiwan: a worst case scenario Scenario 1: Japan losing America Scenario 2: Japan losing China Whither Japan: Policy proposals In the short term Mid to long term: avoid becoming an enfant terrible Taniguchi – Whither Japan? 2 Introduction This paper explores the changes to the Constitution and defense strategy currently underway in Japan and considers where the nation is headed. To address these questions, it will focus on those changes that could seriously affect or alter Japan’s relations with the United States and neighboring countries. The revisions to the Constitution and the ongoing defense buildup certainly meet this criterion, and are therefore drawing attention from the rest of East Asia, as well as from the United States. This paper attempts to make the case that Japan is proceeding rapidly on both of the aforementioned fronts, as if to confirm the wisdom that when things eventually start moving in Japan, they tend to do so rather rapidly.1 For instance, within a relatively short period of two to three years, Japan has: (1) sent Self Defense Force (SDF) troops to Iraq; (2) begun maintaining a quasi-permanent maritime presence in the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea; (3) decided to implement sea-based missile defense, the first country among the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Under the DPJ
    Japan Center for International Exchange Vol. 4 No. 3 | September 2009 Japan under the DPJ Hitoshi Tanaka, Senior Fellow, JCIE Despite widespread predictions of a Liberal Demo- was primarily due to widespread voter dissatisfac- cratic Party (LDP) defeat, the result of the August tion with LDP rule. In other words, the election 30 general election in Japan was nevertheless stun- result does not necessarily indicate strong voter ning. Not only is the LDP no longer the dominant support for the DPJ’s policy platform or confi- party in the Diet for the first time since the party’s dence in its ability to govern. Since popular for- establishment in 1955, its seat total in the Lower mer Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi stepped House plunged from 300 (out of a total of 480) be- down in 2006, Japanese voters have become dis- fore the election to 119 after. In stark contrast, the illusioned with a series of ineffectual LDP prime Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ)—the perennial ministers. Shinzo Abe and Yasuo Fukuda both opposition party in the Lower House—raised its resigned their posts less than a year after taking presence there by a remarkable 191 seats, for a total office, while outgoing Prime Minister Taro Aso is of 308. Together with its plurality (109 of 242 seats) not considered by many to be a solid leader. In ad- in the Upper House, this means that the DPJ now dition to an absence of strong leadership within controls 417 (or roughly 58 percent) of 722 seats the party, the LDP government was also seen as in the Diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Pre-Election Watch: July 2010 Legislative Elections
    Japan Pre-Election Watch: July 2010 Legislative Elections On July 11, Japan will hold elections for 121 seats of the 242 seat House of Councillors (Sangiin), Japan's popularly elected upper body in the legislative branch, known as the Diet. Members of the House of Councillors serve six-year terms which are staggered; half are up for election every three years. The national elections mark the first held since Japan's long- time ruling party, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), was overwhelmingly removed from power by the opposition, center-left Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) which campaigned on bureaucratic reform and improved accountability. Members in the House of Councillors are elected through either constituencies (single non- transferable vote) or nationwide open-list proportional representation; in the former, 73 seats are up for election and in the latter, 48 seats. Candidates belonging to the ruling DPJ must win 60 seats in order to achieve an outright majority. The ruling coalition as a whole will need to win 56 seats to retain its majority. DPJ's current majority is possible only through its coalition with the much smaller People's New Party; the Social Democratic Party (SDP) was previously part of the coalition but recently withdrew over disagreements in the handling of the U.S. military's Futenma Air Station in Okinawa. LDP, whose representation has been dwindling in both houses since the upper house elections in 2007 and the 2009 general elections, faces a critical juncture in terms of future prospects for the party. DPJ control of government is not at stake: the party's control over the House of Representatives (Japan's lower house, known as the Shugiin) ensures the party will retain a majority of seats within the legislature as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Hatoyama Initiative' on Global Warming
    TOPICS ‘Hatoyama Initiative’ on Global Warming Vowing 25% Cut in Japan’s CO2 Emissions By Hiroshi OKABE Photo: Kyodo News Hatoyama said in the al property rights. By incorporating this U.N. speech. “These issue, Hatoyama sought to encourage the will include the introduc- private sector to expand investment. tion of a domestic emis- Hatoyama revised sharply upward the sion-trading mechanism 8% target laid down by the administration and a feed-in tariff for under his predecessor Taro Aso, making renewable energy, as the new, ambitious goal Japan’s interna- well as the consideration tional pledge. Hatoyama, who showed of a global warming tax.” Japan’s new role to the international com- At the same time, he munity, faces a tough challenge of how to said: “Japan’s efforts achieve the 25% reduction target in the alone cannot halt climate years ahead. The domestic business change even if it sets an community, on the other hand, is worried ambitious reduction tar- that Japanese corporations might be left get. It is imperative to behind in international competition due to Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama speaks at a U.N. climate change establish a fair and higher costs if they are to realize the 25% summit in New York on Sept. 22, vowing to cut Japan's effective international cut when they have already achieved a greenhouse gas emissions 25% from their 1990 level by 2020. framework in which all higher energy-saving structure than US The dramatic change of power in Japan major economies participate. The com- and European firms. Large gas-emitting has led to a major shift in the country’s mitment of Japan to the world is industries such as steel are concerned role on the stage of international negotia- premised on agreement on ambitious tar- that they could no longer maintain pro- tions on climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ):Prospects of Atwo-Party System in Japan
    Report The Rise and Fall of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ):Prospects of aTwo-Party System in Japan Samee Siddiqui* 26 February 2013 Al Jazeera Centre for Studies Tel: +974-44663454 [email protected] http://studies.aljazeera.net The Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) came into power in 2009 with promises of bringing long-term change to the Japanese political system: giving the cabinet policy making power, changing the U.S.-Japan security relationship and moving away from massive infrastructure and public works spending. This was supposed to be a water-shed moment in post-war Japanese history. After three years of undelivered policy changes, the DPJ incurred heavy losses in the 2012 elections and the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), with Shinzo Abe as the premier, are back in power once again. The 2009 elections brought an end to what became known as the 1955 system. The former Japanese Prime Minister engineered the merger of two conservative parties in response to the threat from a strong opposition from the political left. The merger reduced the opposition to an almost “permanent minority” and Japan became a ‘1.5 party system1.’ This system was based on political stability, not plurality, and the LDP was in power between 1955 and 2009, barring an 11 month period in opposition, and even then they were the largest party in the Japanese parliament, the Diet. Rise of the DPJ, Fall of the LDP The DPJ was established in 1998 after a merger of various small political parties, along with a group of former Japan Socialist Party (JSP) members and reformist LDP defectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress
    Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress Emma Chanlett-Avery, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs William H. Cooper Specialist in International Trade and Finance Mark E. Manyin Specialist in Asian Affairs October 6, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33436 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress Summary The post-World War II U.S.-Japan alliance has long been an anchor of the U.S. security role in East Asia. The alliance facilitates the forward deployment of about 36,000 U.S. troops and other U.S. military assets in the Asia-Pacific, thereby undergirding U.S. national security strategy in the region. For Japan, the alliance and the U.S. nuclear umbrella provide maneuvering room in dealing with its neighbors, particularly China and North Korea. U.S.-Japan relations have been adjusting to the Democratic Party of Japan’s (DPJ) landslide victory in the August 30, 2009, elections for the Lower House of Japan’s legislature. With the resignation of the DPJ’s first prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama, the United States must now adjust to the leadership of Naoto Kan, the new premier. While most members of the left-of-center DPJ are broadly supportive of the U.S.-Japan alliance and the general thrust of Japanese foreign policy, in the past the party has questioned and/or voted against several features of the alliance, including base realignment and Japan’s financial payments for U.S. forces stationed in Japan. The party has put forward a foreign policy vision that envisions greater “equality” in Japan’s relations with the United States, in part through deeper engagement with Asia and a more United Nations- oriented diplomacy.
    [Show full text]