Colorado Headwaters Laramide Basin Stratigraphic Chart

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Colorado Headwaters Laramide Basin Stratigraphic Chart Colorado Headwaters Laramide Hydrogeologic Geologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Unit Modern- Alluvium associated with present Quaternary Alluvial Aquifers Glaciation rivers Grouse Mountain Basalt Volcanics Neogene Extension Troublesome- Troublesome- North Park Formations North Park Aquifer Rabit Ears Volcanics Volcanics Transition White River White River Formation Aquifer Paleogene Coalmont Formation Coalmont Aquifer Laramide Middle Park Middle Park Formation Aquifer Windy Gap Volcanic Volcanics Formation Middle ParkMiddle Member Pierre confining Pierre Shale unit Cretaceous Interior Regional Cretaceous Seaway shale- Seaway dominated formations form multiple hydrogeologic units, most are confining units Colorado Piedmont Region Jurassic Multiple sedimentary units deposited Mesozoic in the stable continent interior may be Sandstones Triassic present that may form aquifers Permian Ancestral Rocky No strata Pennsylvanian Mountains Mississippian Devonian Paleozoic Silurian No strata Carbonates Ordovician Cambrian Crystalline rocks of igneous and Crystalline Precambrian Precambrian metamorphic origin in mountainous bedrock region Table 11b-02-08-01. Colorado Headwaters Laramide Basin stratigraphic chart. Colorado Headwaters Laramide Unit Thickness Hydrogeologic Geologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Physical Characteristics Hydrologic Characteristics (ft) Unit Modern- Quaternary Alluvium associated with present rivers Alluvial Aquifers Glaciation Grouse Mountain Basalt Basalt flow caprock Volcanics Neogene Extension Troublesome- Unconfined aquifer where tuffaceous siltstone is absent, confined where Tuffaceous siltstone, fine grained sandstone, volcanic ash, conglomerate, Troublesome- North Park Formations 1,000-1,800 North Park siltstone is present; breccia, sandstone, conglomerate, and ash yield water volcanic fows and tuff breccia Aquifer to springs Interbeded tuff, tuff breccia and volcanic breccia interlayered with flows Rabit Ears Volcanics 0 - 1,500 Volcanics of intermediate composition Transition White River White River Formation Continental lakebed deposit Limited aquifer Aquifer Paleogene Large yields of potable water can be expected from poorly consolidated Conglomerate, sandstone, siltstone, and shale with some coal; poorly to Coalmont Formation 6,500 Coalmont Aquifer coarse-grained sandstone and conglomerate; will have limited well yield moderately consolidated. Predominately shale in central part of basin where shale predominates; water quality degrades with depth of aquifer Laramide Upper thick member of grit, sandstone, conglomerate and shale; lower Middle Park Middle Park Formation 2,500-5,000 member of volcanic material Aquifer Windy Gap Volcanic 0-700 Gray volcanic breccia, conglome te and andesitic flows Volcanics Formation ra Middle Middle Park Member Pierre confining Pierre Shale 200-4,500 Shale, siltstone with interbedded sandstone Sandstone layers might yield limited water Cretaceous Interior unit Seaway Regional Cretaceous Seaway shale-dominated formations form multiple hydrogeologic units, most are confining units Jurassic Colorado Mesozoic Multiple sedimentary units deposited in the stable continent interior may be present that may form aquifers Piedmont Region Triassic Sandstones Permian Ancestral Rocky No strata Pennsylvanian Mountains Mississippian Devonian Paleozoic Silurian No strata Carbonates Ordovician Cambrian Crystalline Precambrian Precambrian Crystalline rocks of igneous and metamorphic origin in mountainous region bedrock Table 11b-02-08-01. Colorado Headwaters Laramide Basin stratigraphic chart, detailed. Colorado Geological Survey ON-010 Colorado Groundwater Atlas..
Recommended publications
  • Geology and Coal Resources Op North Park, Colorado
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOR' 596 GEOLOGY AND COAL RESOURCES OP NORTH PARK, COLORADO BY A. L. BEEKLY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction _ ______ _,___________ 7 Location and area__ _ _ _____. __________1___ 7 Accessibility_________________________________ 8 Explorations in the region________________________ 8 Preparation of the map___________________________ 10 Base map_.______________________________ 10 ' Field work_______________________________ 10 Office work______________._________ __ 11 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 11 Geography ______________ ______________________ 12 Relief______________________________________ 12 Major features..____________.________________ 12 Medicine Bow Range_______.________ ______ 12 Park Range____________________________ 13 Continental Divide____________.___________ 13 Floor of the park____________ '._.___________ 13 Minor features________________:_. ______ 14 Drainage___________________ ______________ 16 Settlement__________i_______________________ 18 Stratigraphy __________ __________.___________ 19 Sedimentary rocks ______________________________ 19 Age and correlation.. ______!____ .___________ 19 Geologic section________________._________'_ 20 Carboniferous (?) system_______________________ 21 Pennsylvanfan or Permian (?) series______________ 21 Distribution and character_____.___________ 21 Stratigraphic relations________.___________ 21 Fossils_____________________________ 22 Triassic (?)
    [Show full text]
  • Permophiles Issue #58 November 2013 EXECUTIVE NOTES Notes from the SPS Secretary Museum of Natural History and Science, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, May 20-22, 2013
    Table of Contents Notes from the SPS Secretary 1 Lucia Angiolini Notes from the SPS Chair 2 Shuzhong Shen Subcommission on Permian Stratigraphy Annual Report 2013 3 Shuzhong Shen, SPS Chairman Officers and Voting Members since August, 2012 5 The Reality of GSSPs 6 Stanley C. Finney GSSPs (Global Stratotype Section and Point) and Correlation 8 Stanley C. Finney We Need a New GSSP for the Base of the Permian 8 Spencer G. Lucas The GSSP at the Aidaralash section is solid and has no alternative 13 Vladimir I. Davydov The Aidaralash GSSP—Reply to Davydov 15 Spencer G. Lucas Proposal for the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base-Sakmarian Stage (Lower Permian) 16 Valery V. Chernykh, Boris I. Chuvashov, Shuzhong Shen andCharles M. Henderson Proposal for the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base-Artinskian Stage (Lower Permian) 26 Boris I. Chuvashov, Valery V. Chernykh, Shuzhong Shen and Charles M. Henderson Report of the Chinese, Iranian, Italian working group: The Permian-Triassic boundary sections of Julfa and Zal revisited 34 Lucia Angiolini, Shuzhong Shen, Maryamnaz Bahrammanesh, Syrus Abbasi, Mina Birjandi, Gaia Crippa, Dongxun Yuan and Claudio Garbelli Age assignment of section 4 of Teichert et al. (1973) at Ali Bashi Mountains (Julfa, NW Iran) 36 Abbas Ghaderi, Ali Reza Ashouri, Heinz W. Kozur and Dieter Korn Report of field excursions 2012/2013 of the “Sino-German Cooperation Group on the Late Palaeozoic Palaeobiology, Stratigraphy and Geochemistry” between Europe and China 40 Jun Wang, Shuzhong Shen, Joerg W. Schneider and Hans Kerp ANNOUNCEMENTS 42 SUBMISSION GUIDELINES FOR ISSUE 59 44 Photo 1: The Permian-Triassic succession of the Ali Bashi Mountains, Julfa, NW Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter SN a SUMMARY of COAL in the COALMONT FORMATION
    Chapter SN A SUMMARY OF COAL IN THE COALMONT FORMATION (TERTIARY), NORTH PARK BASIN, COLORADO By S. B. Roberts and G. S. Rossi in U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1625-A Contents Introduction...........................................................................................................................SN-1 Coal Geologic Framework................................................................................................SN-3 Coal Beds and Coal Zones................................................................................................SN-5 McCallum Anticline District.......................................................................................SN-5 Sudduth coal bed......................................................................................................SN-5 Hoyle coal bed..........................................................................................................SN-6 Capron coal zone......................................................................................................SN-6 Winscom coal zone.................................................................................................SN-6 Hill coal bed..............................................................................................................SN-7 Coalmont District...........................................................................................................SN-7 Pole Mountain-Mexican Creek coal zone...........................................................SN-7 Riach coal bed...........................................................................................................SN-8
    [Show full text]
  • Basin-Centered Gas Systems of the U.S. by Marin A
    Basin-Centered Gas Systems of the U.S. By Marin A. Popov,1 Vito F. Nuccio,2 Thaddeus S. Dyman,2 Timothy A. Gognat,1 Ronald C. Johnson,2 James W. Schmoker,2 Michael S. Wilson,1 and Charles Bartberger1 Columbia Basin Western Washington Sweetgrass Arch (Willamette–Puget Mid-Continent Rift Michigan Basin Sound Trough) (St. Peter Ss) Appalachian Basin (Clinton–Medina Snake River and older Fms) Hornbrook Basin Downwarp Wasatch Plateau –Modoc Plateau San Rafael Swell (Dakota Fm) Sacramento Basin Hanna Basin Great Denver Basin Basin Santa Maria Basin (Monterey Fm) Raton Basin Arkoma Park Anadarko Los Angeles Basin Chuar Basin Basin Group Basins Black Warrior Basin Colville Basin Salton Mesozoic Rift Trough Permian Basin Basins (Abo Fm) Paradox Basin (Cane Creek interval) Central Alaska Rio Grande Rift Basins (Albuquerque Basin) Gulf Coast– Travis Peak Fm– Gulf Coast– Cotton Valley Grp Austin Chalk; Eagle Fm Cook Inlet Open-File Report 01–135 Version 1.0 2001 This report is preliminary, has not been reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature, and should not be reproduced or distributed. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government. 1Geologic consultants on contract to the USGS 2USGS, Denver U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey BASIN-CENTERED GAS SYSTEMS OF THE U.S. DE-AT26-98FT40031 U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Contractor: U.S. Geological Survey Central Region Energy Team DOE Project Chief: Bill Gwilliam USGS Project Chief: V.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Papers in the Geological Sciences
    Short Papers in the Geological Sciences Geological Survey Research 1960 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 400-B UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1960 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price $4.25 (paper cover) CONTENTS Foreword (see chapter A) Preface (see chapter A) Geology of metalliferous deposits Page 1. An hypothesis for origin of ore-forming fluid, by J. Hoover Mackin and Earl Ingerson- .......................... B1 2. Varieties of supergene zinc deposits in the United States, by A. V. Heyl, Jr., and C. N. Bozion -------..-----------.. 2 3. Lithofacies of the Copper Harbor conglomerate, northern Michigan, by Walter S. White and James C. Wright------ 5 4. Relation of the Colorado mineral belt to Precambrian structure, by Ogden Tweto and P. K. Sims -..--------------- 8 5. Pre-ore age of faults at Leadville, Colorado, by Ogden Tweto -..----------__----..----------------------------.- 10 6. Pre-ore propylitization, Silverton caldera, Colorado, by Wilbur S. Burbank ------- --- ----- -------- -- --- --- --- --- 12 7. Ring-fractured bodies in the Silverton caldera, Colorado, by Robert G. Luedke and Wilbur S. Burbank-- -- - - - - - - - - - 13 8. Relation of mineralization to caldera subsidence in the Creede district, San Juan Mountains, Colorado, by Thomas A. Steven and James C. RattB ----------_-----_-_----_-----.._---------------..--------------------- ----- - 9. Alinement of mining districts in north-central Nevada, by Ralph J. Roberts -..---------------------------------- 10. Mineral assemblage of a pyrometasomatic deposit near Tonopah, Nevada, by R. A. Gttlbrandsen and D. G. Gielow- 11. Sedimentary iron-formation in the Devonian Martin formation, Christmas quadrangle, Arizona, by Ronald Willden- 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado
    Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3130 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: View to the southeast, from high gravel-capped hill near the town of Winter Park, looking toward snow- clad peaks along the Continental Divide east of Berthoud Pass. High peak on the far left is James Peak, 13,294 ft, (4,052 m). In foreground, the dense forest is composed of conifers and aspen, and is growing in soils formed in surficial deposits and weathered bedrock. Photograph by R.R. Shroba, September 26, 2006. Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado By Ralph R. Shroba, Bruce Bryant, Karl S. Kellogg, Paul K. Theobald, and Theodore R. Brandt Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3130 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://www.store usgs.. gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the North and South Mccallum Anticlines, Jackson
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAROLD L. ICKES, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. MINDENHALL, Director ---0--- CIRCULAR 5 -0- GEOLOGY OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH McCALLUM ANTICLINES, JACKSON COUNTY, COLORADO WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PETROLEUM AND CARBON DIOXIDE By J. C. MILLER WASHINGTON 1934 ,� -',.. :,4:----4' - �sf,if,-;5;:.--,' • MO- „-„ ;,?!•,;'; 45; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAROLD L. ICKES, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. MENDENHALL, Director COOogical Survey Ft. C Pjoiare Collection -0-- CIRCULAR 5 ---0- GEOLOGY OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH IvIcCALLUM ANTICLINES, JACKSON COUNTY, COLORADO WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PETROLEUM AND CARBON DIOXIDE By J. C. MILLER WASHINGTON 1934 80277 CONTENTS Page bstract . • . • 3 Introduction . 4 Location and extent of area . 4 Earlier work . 4 Present investigation . 4 Purpose of the report . 0 Acknowledgments . 5 Preparation of the map . 0 Base map . 5 Field work . 6 Geography . 6 Stratiraphy 7 Geologic section . 9 Carboniferous system • . 10 Triassic system .. 10 Claugwater formation • . 10 Jurassic system . 10 Morrison formation • . 10 Cretaceous system . • . 11 Dakota sandstone . • 11 Benton shale . • 12 Niobrara formation. 12 Pierre shale. , . 12 Stratigraphic relations 13 Tertiary system . • 15 Coalmont formation • 15 Quaternary system . • • . 16 Structure . 17 General features , 17 Faults . 18 Subsurface structure . 19 Preparation of structure-contour map 20 Petroleum . 21 History of the field 21 Occurrence . .. 22 Engineering problems . 23 Carbon dioxide . 23 Analysis of gas . 24 Difficulties of production . • . • 24 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1. Index map and structure sections . 6 Plate 2. Structure-contour map . 21 Figure 1. Isotherms for carbon dioxide . 25 2 GEOLOGY OF TEE NORTH AND SO= liicCA=1 ANTICLINES JACKSON CO=Y, COLORADO WITH SPECIAL REFEnEXCE TO PE1ROTZUM AND CARBON DIOXIDE Mr J.
    [Show full text]
  • J GEOLOGY of URANIUM DEPOSITS in the C NORTHERN PART of the ROCKY MOUNTAIN ~ PROVINCE of COLORADO I by Roger C
    :NER \EC-RD 11111111111 1 4 AEC-RD-14 CJ. I UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION GRAND JUNCTION OFFICE PRODUCTION EVALUATION DIVISION RESOURCE APPRAISAl BRANCH t J GEOLOGY OF URANIUM DEPOSITS IN THE C NORTHERN PART OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ~ PROVINCE OF COLORADO I by Roger C. Malan ~ Issue Date May 1983 Grand Junction Area Office Grand Junction. Colorado Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. c~n&::;?'j_ >,fc..~ L'~ \t,.\ AEC-RD-14 UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COHMISSIOI'I GRAND JUNCTION OFFICE PRODUCTION EVALUATION DIVISION RESOURCE APPRAISAL BRANCH GEOLOGY OF URANIUH DEPOSITS IN THE NORTHEfui PART OF THE ROCKY HOUNTAIN PROVINCE OF COLORADO BY Roger C. '!alan DATE DUE October 1965 nd Junction, Colorado DEMCO, INC. 38·2931 Geology of Uranium Deposits in the Northern Part of the Rocky Mountain Province of Colorado TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY. • • • • 9 INTRODUCTION • • 9 URANIUM INDUSTRY 14 HISTORY. • • 14 PRODUCTION AND RESERVES.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate T. Relation of Lithostratigraphic Units to Hydrogeologic Units, Sierra Madre, Medicine Bow Mountains, and Saratoga Valley
    Hydrogeologic role/unit of Richter (1981a; Hydrogeologic division of Lowry et al. (1973) Hydrogeologic role/unit of Statewide Lithostratigraphic units of Love et al. Hydrogeologic role/unit of Saulnier (1968)3 Figure II-6, Table IV-2, and text) Hydrogeologic unit of Lenfest (1986) Hydrogeologic unit used in this report for [Laramie, Hanna, and Shirley Basins including Framework Water Plan SYSTEM AND SERIES (1993) in the Sierra Madre and [North flank of Medicine Bow Mountains [Laramie, Hanna, and Shirley Basins; and Crist (1990) Sierra Madre, Medicine Bow Mountains, Sierra Madre, Medicine Bow Mountains (WWC Engineering et al., 2007, Figure 4-9) Medicine Bow Mountains and Pass Creek Basin area] Sierra Madre, Medicine Bow Mountains [Saratoga Valley area] and Saratoga Valley ERATHEM (east flank), and Saratoga Valley] [All of Wyoming] (east flank), and Saratoga Valley] Holocene 2 QUATERNARY and Alluvium and terrace deposits Quaternary aquifers Local aquifers5 Local aquifers8 Quaternary unconsolidated-deposit aquifers Pleistocene Major aquifer–alluvial Giant Pliocene unit not defined Not discussed Not discussed Not discussed Not discussed conglomerate Hydrogeologic role/ Basalt flows and Browns Park 8 Hydrogeologic role/ Miocene 2 Not discussed Not discussed Aquifer Major aquifer–sandstone Browns Park aquifer intrusive masses Formation Unit 7 unit not defined CENOZOIC TERTIARY Oligocene White River Formation Marginal aquifer White River aquifer and confining unit Principal aquifers–Tertiary aquifers6 Eocene Coalmont Formation Hydrogeologic
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Geologic Names of North America
    Index to the Geologic Names of North America GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-B Index to the Geologic Names of North America By DRUID WILSON, GRACE C. KEROHER, and BLANCHE E. HANSEN GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 10S6-B Geologic names arranged by age and by area containing type locality. Includes names in Greenland, the West Indies, the Pacific Island possessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Major stratigraphic and time divisions in use by the U.S. Geological Survey._ iv Introduction______________________________________ 407 Acknowledgments. _--__ _______ _________________________________ 410 Bibliography________________________________________________ 410 Symbols___________________________________ 413 Geologic time and time-stratigraphic (time-rock) units________________ 415 Time terms of nongeographic origin_______________________-______ 415 Cenozoic_________________________________________________ 415 Pleistocene (glacial)______________________________________ 415 Cenozoic (marine)_______________________________________ 418 Eastern North America_______________________________ 418 Western North America__-__-_____----------__-----____ 419 Cenozoic (continental)___________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Permian Timescale: an Introduction
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 2, 2021 The Permian timescale: an introduction SPENCER G. LUCAS1* & SHU-ZHONG SHEN2 1New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Road NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104-1375, USA 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210008, China *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Permian timescale has developed over about two centuries of research to the current chronostratigraphic scale advocated by the Subcommission on Permian Stratigraphy of three series and nine stages: Cisuralian (lower Permian) – Asselian, Sakmarian, Artinskian, Kun- gurian; Guadalupian (middle Permian) – Roadian, Wordian, Capitanian; and Lopingian (upper Permian) – Wuchiapingian and Changhsingian. The boundaries of the Permian System are defined by global stratotype sections and points (GSSPs) and the numerical ages of those boundaries appear to be determined with a precision better than 1‰. Nevertheless, much work remains to be done to refine the Permian timescale. Precise numerical age control within the Permian is very uneven and a global polarity timescale for the Permian is far from established. Chronostratigraphic definitions of three of the nine Permian stages remain unfinished and various issues of marine biostratigraphy are still unresolved. In the non-marine Permian realm, much progress has been made in correlation, especially using palynomorphs, megafossil plants, conchostracans and both the footprints and bones of tetrapods (amphibians and reptiles), but many problems of correlation remain, especially the cross-correlation of non-marine and marine chronologies. The further development of a Perm- ian chronostratigraphic scale faces various problems, including those of stability and priority of nomenclature and concepts, disagreements over changing taxonomy, ammonoid v.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Wilderness Legislation on Water-Project Development in Colorado
    EFFECTS OF WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ON WATER-PROJECT DEVELOPMENT IN COLORADO by Glen D. Heaver ~·1ay 1983 Colorado Stote University Fort Collins,Colorad,o Completion Report No. 124 EFFECTS OF WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ON WATER-PROJECT DEVELOPMENT IN COLORADO Project No. A-044-COLO Agreement Nos. 14-34-0001-9006 and 14-34-0001-0106 by Glen D. Weaver Department of Economics Colorado State University Research Project Technical Completion Report The research on which this report is based was financed in part by the U.S. Department of the Interior, as authorized by the Water Research and Development Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-467). Colorado Water Resources Research Institute Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Norman A. Evans, Director May 1983 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to acknowledge the cooperation of many individuals who contributed information to this study. Special recognition is extended to personnel of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Forest Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation, and Bureau of Land Management, who responded to numerous requests for data. Sincere thanks is also given to Mrs. Waneta Boyce and Mrs. Denise Davis for their excellent typing of the manuscript. i ABSTRACT Environmental policies embodied in the Wilderness Act, Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and Endangered Species Act impose certain restrictions on the de­ velopment of Colorado's water resources. Planning costs are unavoidably in­ creased because time and personnel must be invested in complying with proce­ dural requirements of the laws. Capital or operating costs may be increased because of construction delays, required engineering desi~n changes, or spa­ tial relocation of project facilities.
    [Show full text]