Contrast Agents in Pediatric Neuroimaging

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contrast Agents in Pediatric Neuroimaging Contrast Agents in Pediatric Neuroimaging Sylvester Chuang1 From the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario During the last two decades the development which substitutions are made at the acid group. of contrast agents for myelography, angiography, Examples of common contrast agents used in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic reso­ North America are listed in Table 1. nance imaging (MR) has been remarkable. What Recent developments have all centered on the follows is a review of contrast agents used in nonionic contrast agents, because these are less neuroradiology-specifically, the ionic and non­ toxic than the ionics (1); however, the cost of the ionic contrast agents for radiographic/CT proce­ nonionics is significantly higher than that of the dures, and the paramagnetic contrast agents used ionics. Despite the debate regarding the cost in MR studies. Topics covered are the indications effectiveness of the nonionics (2-9), we routinely for and use of contrast agents, doses and com­ use nonionic contrast agents for all radiologic parisons, complications and cost benefits, and investigations at the Hospital for Sick Children in what the future of contrast media might hold. Toronto. We do so because of the lower compli­ cation rate, although there is no convincing evi­ Iodinated Contrast Agents dence of any decrease in the mortality rate. Nevertheless, when there is extravasation of con­ The basic structure of iodinated contrast trast into the tissue on IV injection, the morbidity agents is the benzene ring (Fig. 1), with its at­ is lower. tached iodine atoms. The remaining components Elimination of contrast agents is dependent on are the acid group and organic substitutes which organic substitutions. If one of the organic sub­ influence excretion and toxicity. The hydrogen stituents is a hydrogen atom, then the compound atoms in the acid group can be replaced by a is excreted by the biliary system. If none of the cation, such as sodium (Na) or meglumine, in organic substltuents is a hydrogen atom on the which case the contrast agent is ionic. If the benzene ring, then the contrast is excreted by the hydrogen atom in the acid group is replaced kidneys. instead by amine-carrying hydroxyl groups, then There is a major difference in osmolality and the compound is nonionic (Fig. 2). viscosity between the ionic and nonionic contrast When there is only one benzene ring in the agents and between the monomeric and dimeric compound, the contrast agent is a monomer; contrast agents. Examples of these are listed in when there are two benzene rings in the com­ Table 2. Osmolality is defined as milliosmoles per pound, the contrast agent is a dimer (Fig. 3). The kilogram of water; osmolarity is defined as mil­ compound with 'two benzene rings contains twice liosmoles per litre of solution. In water, the os­ the amount of iodine in the molecule compared malility is equivalent to the osmolarity. Because to the monomer. Monomeric and dim eric contrast of the dissociation of the cation and the anion in agents can be ionic or nonionic, depending on solution, the ionic contrast agent obviously has a much higher osmolarity than does the nonionic 1 Address reprint requests to Dr Chuang, Division of Neuroradiology, contrast agent. Hence, the other names of the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 two contrast agents are high osmolar contrast University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G IX8 Canada. medium (HOCM) (ie, ionic) and low osmolar con­ Index terms: Contrast media; Pediatric neuroradiology trast medium (LOCM) (ie, nonionic), respectively. AJNR 13:785-791, Mar/ Apr 1992 0195-6108/ 92/ 1302-0785 In terms of viscosity, the larger the molecule, © American Society of Neuroradiology the more viscous is the contrast agent. Therefore, 785 786 AJNR: 13, March/April1992 ionic monomers (Table 3). The viscosity, how­ Structural characteristics of X-ray contrast media ever, changes with temperature (10). The higher Baste structure St ructural elements Signification the temperature, the less viscous the contrast Benzene Basic structure becomes. For this reason, nonionic contrast 0 agents are warmed to body temperature for intra­ COOH I Iodine atomes Radiopague component venous or intraarterial injections, so as to make the injection easier and more rapid. COOH Acid group Sallformation or 6 21 acid-amide bound Because the nonionic contrast agents have a 3 Water-solubility R'2¢ ~ R,' lower complication rate than the ionic contrast R,; R2 Organic Reduction of toxicity agents in intravenous and intraarterial usage, they I substituents Influence on liophilia are the only contrast agents that can be used R, Organic Influence on eliminatron intrathecally for myelography and ventriculogra­ substituent phy (11-13). With the advent of MR imaging, there are now fewer indications for myelography Fig. 1 . Basic structure of iodinated contrast agent; benzene and ventriculography; however, in cases of iso­ ring; ionic monomer. lated tethered cord (or tight filum terminate syn­ drome) and in patients who have difficulty in Ionic and non-ionic monomeric contrast media cooperating, myelography is still a more useful --·--- --------------- diagnostic tool (14). Ventriculography is still use­ Ionic contrast media Non-ionic contrast media ful in analyzing the communication and compart­ mentalization of the ventricular system and cis­ Kat• Na · -ca tion, Meg • -cation - N(R)2 Amine carrying hydroxyl groups terns (15). - R Organic radical - R Organic radical --- The dosage used for ventriculography is ap­ proximately 1-2 mL of isotonic nonionic contrast coo- Kat• CO· N(R)2 TABLE 1: Low osmolar contrast medium commonly used in North , ,I - I American R- OC- HN'D ~ 'NH - CO-R i R - OC-~'Dj~/ ' 'NH - CO- R Contrast Medium Manufacturer - I . I Rl_ ___ _l Hexabrix-loxaglate Mallinkrodt lohexoi·Omnipaque Sterling-Winthrop lopamidol-lsovue Squibb Fig. 2. Nonionic monomer contrast chemical structure; hydro­ loversoi-Optiray Mallinkrodt gen atom in acid group replaced by hydroxyl group. TABLE 2: Osmolality and viscosity of non ionic contrast agents Contrast Agent Viscosity at Concentration Osmolality 37°C (cps) (mg lodine/mL) (mOsm/Kg H20) Optiray 320 5.8 320 702 (loversol) lohexol 6.3 300 672 lopamidol 4.7 300 616 lohexol 2.0 180 408 Optiray 160 1.9 160 355 (loversol) lopamidol 1.4 128 290 TABLE 3: Viscosity of contrast agents of 300 mgiJ mg at 37°C Contrast Viscosity Type Fig. 3. Dimer contrast agent with two benzene rings; ionic or Sodium trizoate 2.4 Ionic monomer nonionic dependent on the acid group. Meglumine trizoate 5.0 Ionic monomer Meglumine ioglicate 6.0 Ionic dimer the most viscous contrast agents are the nonionic lohexol 5.7 Nonionic monomer dimers, as opposed to the ionic dimers and the lopamidol 4.6 Nonionic monomer lotrolan 9.0 Nonionic dimer nonionic monomers. The least viscous are the AJNR: 13, March/April 1992 787 TABLE 4: Complete myelography dosage table the nonionic group. In intravascular usage, ad­ verse reactions appear to depend on three factors, Concentration mL/ kg mg 1/mgl namely chemotoxicity, osmotoxicity, and low toxicity (6, 21, 22). The chemotoxicity effect Less than 2 mo 180-210 1/2 2 mo-2 yr 180-210 2-4 causes red cell crenation and rigidity with direct 3 yr-7 yr 180-210 4-8 effect on cell membranes and organelles causing 8 yr-12 yr 180-210 7-1 2 endothelial damage in vessels. There is also re­ 13 yr-17 yr 180-210 8-14 lease of vasoactive substances from cells (6). (The vasoactive substances include histamine, ser­ TABLE 5: Cerebral angiography-contrast dosage tonin, fibrolysin, kallikreins, prostaglandins, leu­ kotrienes, complements, and bradykinin.) The Under 10 10-20 20-40 Over 50 osmotoxicity or osmotic effect causes pain during kg kg kg kg arteriography, vasodilatation with hypotension, Internal carotid artery 2-4 cc 4-6 cc 6-7 cc 7-8 cc and rigidification of red blood cells. The osmotox­ External carotid artery 1-2 cc 2-3 cc 3-4 cc 4-5 cc icity of the contrast agent is governed by a ratio Common carotid artery 4-5 cc 5-7 cc 6-8 cc 9-10 cc Vertebral artery 2-3 cc 3-5 cc 5-7 cc 6-8 cc that comprises the number of iodine atoms over the number of particles in an ideal solution, and is equal to the imaging effect of contrast medium agent. The dosage used for myelography is listed over the osmotic effect of contrast medium. The in Table 4. The dosage varies with the patient's higher the ratio, the lower the osmotoxicity. age rather than weight because the size of the Adverse reactions can be classified as mild or subarachnoid space tends to vary with age rather severe: mild reactions include urticaria, general­ than with weight (16). ized pruritus, sneezing, rhinitis, nasal stuffiness, We have done a comparative study of 180 mg coughing, and lacrimation; severe reactions in­ % b versus 210 mg % b, in myelography and clude wheezing, dyspnea, laryngospasm, status found that if same amount of Iodine is given, ie, asthmaticus, subglottic oedema, angioneurotic larger volume of 180 mg % b as compared to oedema, anaphylactic shock, and cardiovascular 210 mg % b, there is little appreciable difference collapse. Laryngotracheal edema and urticaria are in the quality of the myelogram (17); however, if part of the immune response, although no spe­ the same volume is given, then the more concen­ cific antibodies lgG or lgE have been isolated (23). trated 210 mg % b does provide a better myelo­ The cardiovascular effect is probably related to graphic study. This is not the case in CT myelog­ chemotoxicity as well as to osmotoxicity. In ad­ raphy. dition to endothelial damage, hyperosmolality Contrast dosage for cerebral angiography is causes decrease in smooth vascular muscle tone listed in Table 5.
Recommended publications
  • Intrathecal Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Cisternography in the Evaluation Of
    Intrathecal Gadolinium-Enhanced MR ORIGINAL RESEARCH Cisternography in the Evaluation of CSF Leakage H. Selcuk BACKROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiologic identification of the location of the CSF leakage is important S. Albayram for proper surgical planning and increases the chance of dural repair. This article describes our experience in analyzing clinically suspected cranial CSF fistulas by using MR imaging combined with H. Ozer the intrathecal administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. S. Ulus MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 85 consecutive patients with suspected CSF fistulas who G.Z. Sanus presented with persistent or intermittent rhinorrhea or otorrhea lasting for more than 1 month between M.Y. Kaynar 2003 and 2007 were included in this study. N. Kocer RESULTS: We observed objective CSF leakage in 64 of 85 patients (75%). The CSF leak was located C. Islak in the ethmoidal region in 37 patients (58%), in the superior wall of the sphenoid sinus in 8 patients (13%), in the posterior wall of the frontal sinus in 10 patients (15%), in the superior wall of the mastoid air cells in 6 patients (9%), and from the skull base into the infratemporal fossa in 1 patient (2%). Two patients (3%) showed leakage into Ͼ1 paranasal sinus. CONCLUSIONS: MR cisternography after the intrathecal administration of gadopentate dimeglumine represents an effective and minimally invasive method for evaluating suspected CSF fistulas along the skull base. It provides multiplanar capabilities without risk of radiation exposure and is an excellent approach to depict the anatomy of CSF spaces and CSF fistulas. SF leakage implies abnormal communication between the using this technique.19,20 In addition, the combination of CT Csubarachnoid space and the nasal or middle ear cavity.
    [Show full text]
  • MDCT and Contrast Media: What Are the Risks?
    071_078_00_Thomsen:Thomsen 13-02-2008 9:32 Pagina 71 MDCT and Contrast Media: What are the Risks? Henrik S. Thomsen Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Introduction Renal Adverse Reactions With the advent of multi-detector computed to- Contrast-material-induced kidney damage is imme- mography (MDCT) technology, the number of pa- diate, starting as soon as the first CM molecule reach- tients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) es the kidney; however, it takes several hours or days studies has steadily grown in the last 6 years. In for a deterioration of renal function to be detected. 2005, approximately 22 million CECT examinations Despite more than 30 years of research, the patho- were carried out in the European Union, and 32 mil- physiology of CM-induced nephropathy (CIN) is lion in the United States (The Imaging Market Guide poorly elucidated. Nonetheless, several risk factors 2005. Arlington Medical Resources, Inc., Philadel- are well-known and can be divided into CM- and pa- phia, PA). Unfortunately, post-contrast-material-re- tient-related factors. lated adverse events, i.e., all those unintended and unfavorable signs, symptoms, or diseases temporally associated with the use of an iodinated contrast ma- Contrast-Medium-Related Factors terial (CM), are a common occurrence in radiology departments. Most adverse events occur within the More than 25 years ago, Barrett and Carlisle [1] first 60 min following CM administration (“imme- showed that the incidence of CIN is significantly diate” or “acute” adverse events), with the greatest higher after the administration of high-osmolarity risk in the first 20 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacologyonline 2: 727-753 (2010) Ewsletter Bradu and Rossini
    Pharmacologyonline 2: 727-753 (2010) ewsletter Bradu and Rossini COTRAST AGETS - IODIATED PRODUCTS. SECOD WHO-ITA / ITA-OMS 2010 COTRIBUTIO O AGGREGATE WHO SYSTEM-ORGA CLASS DISORDERS AD/OR CLUSTERIG BASED O REPORTED ADVERSE REACTIOS/EVETS Dan Bradu and Luigi Rossini* Servizio Nazionale Collaborativo WHO-ITA / ITA-OMS, Università Politecnica delle Marche e Progetto di Farmacotossicovigilanza, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Regione Marche, Italia Summary From the 2010 total basic adverse reactions and events collected as ADRs preferred names in the WHO-Uppsala Drug Monitoring Programme, subdivided in its first two twenty years periods as for the first seven iodinated products diagnostic contrast agents amidotrizoate, iodamide, iotalamate, iodoxamate, ioxaglate, iohexsol and iopamidol, their 30 WHO-system organ class disorders (SOCDs) aggregates had been compared. Their common maximum 97% levels identified six SOCDs only, apt to evaluate the most frequent single ADRs for each class, and their percentual normalization profiles for each product. The WILKS's chi square statistics for the related contingency tables, and Gabriel’s STP procedure applied to the extracted double data sets then produced profile binary clustering, as well as Euclidean confirmatory plots. They finally showed similar objectively evaluated autoclassificative trends of these products, which do not completely correspond to their actual ATC V08A A, B and C subdivision: while amidotrizoate and iotalamate, and respectively iohesol and iopamidol are confirmed to belong to the A and B subgroups, ioxaglate behaves fluctuating within A, B and C, but iodamide looks surprizingly, constantly positioned together with iodoxamate as binary/ternary C associated. In view of the recent work of Campillos et al (Science, 2008) which throws light on the subject, the above discrepancies do not appear anymore unexpected or alarming.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Note: Within Nine Months from the Publication of the Mention
    Europäisches Patentamt (19) European Patent Office & Office européen des brevets (11) EP 1 411 992 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A61K 49/04 (2006.01) A61K 49/18 (2006.01) 13.12.2006 Bulletin 2006/50 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 02758379.8 PCT/EP2002/008183 (22) Date of filing: 23.07.2002 (87) International publication number: WO 2003/013616 (20.02.2003 Gazette 2003/08) (54) IONIC AND NON-IONIC RADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST AGENTS FOR USE IN COMBINED X-RAY AND NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE DIAGNOSTICS IONISCHES UND NICHT-IONISCHES RADIOGRAPHISCHES KONTRASTMITTEL ZUR VERWENDUNG IN DER KOMBINIERTEN ROENTGEN- UND KERNSPINTOMOGRAPHIEDIAGNOSTIK SUBSTANCES IONIQUES ET NON-IONIQUES DE CONTRASTE RADIOGRAPHIQUE UTILISEES POUR ETABLIR DES DIAGNOSTICS FAISANT APPEL AUX RAYONS X ET A L’IMAGERIE PAR RESONANCE MAGNETIQUE (84) Designated Contracting States: (74) Representative: Minoja, Fabrizio AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Bianchetti Bracco Minoja S.r.l. IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR Via Plinio, 63 20129 Milano (IT) (30) Priority: 03.08.2001 IT MI20011706 (56) References cited: (43) Date of publication of application: EP-A- 0 759 785 WO-A-00/75141 28.04.2004 Bulletin 2004/18 US-A- 5 648 536 (73) Proprietor: BRACCO IMAGING S.p.A. • K HERGAN, W. DORINGER, M. LÄNGLE W.OSER: 20134 Milano (IT) "Effects of iodinated contrast agents in MR imaging" EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF (72) Inventors: RADIOLOGY, vol. 21, 1995, pages 11-17, • AIME, Silvio XP002227102 20134 Milano (IT) • K.M.
    [Show full text]
  • ACR Manual on Contrast Media
    ACR Manual On Contrast Media 2021 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media Preface 2 ACR Manual on Contrast Media 2021 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media © Copyright 2021 American College of Radiology ISBN: 978-1-55903-012-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page 1. Preface 1 2. Version History 2 3. Introduction 4 4. Patient Selection and Preparation Strategies Before Contrast 5 Medium Administration 5. Fasting Prior to Intravascular Contrast Media Administration 14 6. Safe Injection of Contrast Media 15 7. Extravasation of Contrast Media 18 8. Allergic-Like And Physiologic Reactions to Intravascular 22 Iodinated Contrast Media 9. Contrast Media Warming 29 10. Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury and Contrast 33 Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Adults 11. Metformin 45 12. Contrast Media in Children 48 13. Gastrointestinal (GI) Contrast Media in Adults: Indications and 57 Guidelines 14. ACR–ASNR Position Statement On the Use of Gadolinium 78 Contrast Agents 15. Adverse Reactions To Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media 79 16. Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) 83 17. Ultrasound Contrast Media 92 18. Treatment of Contrast Reactions 95 19. Administration of Contrast Media to Pregnant or Potentially 97 Pregnant Patients 20. Administration of Contrast Media to Women Who are Breast- 101 Feeding Table 1 – Categories Of Acute Reactions 103 Table 2 – Treatment Of Acute Reactions To Contrast Media In 105 Children Table 3 – Management Of Acute Reactions To Contrast Media In 114 Adults Table 4 – Equipment For Contrast Reaction Kits In Radiology 122 Appendix A – Contrast Media Specifications 124 PREFACE This edition of the ACR Manual on Contrast Media replaces all earlier editions.
    [Show full text]
  • ACR Manual on Contrast Media – Version 9, 2013 Table of Contents / I
    ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 9 2013 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media ACR Manual on Contrast Media – Version 9, 2013 Table of Contents / i ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 9 2013 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media © Copyright 2013 American College of Radiology ISBN: 978-1-55903-012-0 Table of Contents Topic Last Updated Page 1. Preface. V9 – 2013 . 3 2. Introduction . V7 – 2010 . 4 3. Patient Selection And Preparation Strategies . V7 – 2010 . 5 4. Injection of Contrast Media . V7 – 2010 . 13 5. Extravasation Of Contrast Media . V7 – 2010 . 17 6. Allergic-Like And Physiologic Reactions To Intravascular Iodinated Contrast Media . V9 – 2013 . 21 7. Contrast Media Warming . V8 – 2012 . 29 8. Contrast-Induced Nephrotoxicity . V8 – 2012 . 33 9. Metformin . V7 – 2010 . 43 10. Contrast Media In Children . V7 – 2010 . 47 11. Gastrointestinal (GI) Contrast Media In Adults: Indications And Guidelines V9 – 2013 . 55 12. Adverse Reactions To Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media . V7 – 2010 . 77 13. Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis . V8 – 2012 . 81 14. Treatment Of Contrast Reactions . V9 – 2013 . 91 15. Administration Of Contrast Media To Pregnant Or Potentially Pregnant Patients . V9 – 2013 . 93 16. Administration Of Contrast Media To Women Who Are Breast-Feeding . V9 – 2013 . 97 Table 1 – Indications for Use of Iodinated Contrast Media . V9 – 2013 . 99 Table 2 – Organ and System-Specific Adverse Effects from the Administration of Iodine-Based or Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. V9 – 2013 . 100 Table 3 – Categories of Acute Reactions . V9 – 2013 . 101 Table 4 – Treatment of Acute Reactions to Contrast Media in Children . V9 – 2013 .
    [Show full text]
  • Ehealth DSI [Ehdsi V2.2.2-OR] Ehealth DSI – Master Value Set
    MTC eHealth DSI [eHDSI v2.2.2-OR] eHealth DSI – Master Value Set Catalogue Responsible : eHDSI Solution Provider PublishDate : Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 1 of 490 MTC Table of Contents epSOSActiveIngredient 4 epSOSAdministrativeGender 148 epSOSAdverseEventType 149 epSOSAllergenNoDrugs 150 epSOSBloodGroup 155 epSOSBloodPressure 156 epSOSCodeNoMedication 157 epSOSCodeProb 158 epSOSConfidentiality 159 epSOSCountry 160 epSOSDisplayLabel 167 epSOSDocumentCode 170 epSOSDoseForm 171 epSOSHealthcareProfessionalRoles 184 epSOSIllnessesandDisorders 186 epSOSLanguage 448 epSOSMedicalDevices 458 epSOSNullFavor 461 epSOSPackage 462 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 2 of 490 MTC epSOSPersonalRelationship 464 epSOSPregnancyInformation 466 epSOSProcedures 467 epSOSReactionAllergy 470 epSOSResolutionOutcome 472 epSOSRoleClass 473 epSOSRouteofAdministration 474 epSOSSections 477 epSOSSeverity 478 epSOSSocialHistory 479 epSOSStatusCode 480 epSOSSubstitutionCode 481 epSOSTelecomAddress 482 epSOSTimingEvent 483 epSOSUnits 484 epSOSUnknownInformation 487 epSOSVaccine 488 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 3 of 490 MTC epSOSActiveIngredient epSOSActiveIngredient Value Set ID 1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.10.1.3.1.42.24 TRANSLATIONS Code System ID Code System Version Concept Code Description (FSN) 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01 A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Contrast Media Viscosity Versus Osmolality in Kidney Injury: Lessons from Animal Studies
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International Volume 2014, Article ID 358136, 15 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/358136 Review Article Contrast Media Viscosity versus Osmolality in Kidney Injury: Lessons from Animal Studies Erdmann Seeliger, Diana C. Lenhard, and Pontus B. Persson Institute of Physiology and Center for Cardiovascular Research, Charite-University´ Medicine Berlin, Campus Mitte, Hessische Straße 3-4, 10115 Berlin, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to Erdmann Seeliger; [email protected] Received 18 October 2013; Accepted 29 December 2013; Published 23 February 2014 Academic Editor: Richard Solomon Copyright © 2014 Erdmann Seeliger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Iodinated contrast media (CM) can induce acute kidney injury (AKI). CM share common iodine-related cytotoxic features but differ considerably with regard to osmolality and viscosity. Meta-analyses of clinical trials generally failed to reveal renal safety differences of modern CM with regard to these physicochemical properties. While most trials’ reliance on serum creatinine as outcome measure contributes to this lack of clinical evidence, it largely relies on the nature of prospective clinical trials: effective prophylaxis by ample hydration must be employed. In everyday life, patients are often not well hydrated; here we lack clinical data. However, preclinical studies that directly measured glomerular filtration rate, intrarenal perfusion and oxygenation, and various markers of AKI have shown that the viscosity of CM is of vast importance. In the renal tubules, CM become enriched, as water is reabsorbed, but CM are not.
    [Show full text]
  • OPTIRAY® Ioversol Injection
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH INCLUDING PATIENT MEDICATION INFORMATION OPTIRAY® Ioversol Injection OPTIRAY® 240 Ioversol Injection 51% w/v, 240 mgI/mL OPTIRAY® 300 Ioversol Injection 64% w/v, 300 mgI/mL OPTIRAY® 320 Ioversol Injection 68% w/v, 320 mgI/mL OPTIRAY® 350 Ioversol Injection 74% w/v, 350 mgI/mL Nonionic Iodinated Radiographic Contrast Medium Liebel-Flarsheim Canada Inc. 7500 Trans-Canada Highway Date of Revision: Pointe-Claire, QC, H9R 5H8 November 1, 2017 CANADA Submission Control No: 203281 Page 1 of 55 Table of Contents PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .........................................................3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION ........................................................................3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ..............................................................................3 CONTRAINDICATIONS ...................................................................................................4 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ..................................................................................4 ADVERSE REACTIONS ..................................................................................................13 DRUG INTERACTIONS ..................................................................................................19 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ..............................................................................19 OVERDOSAGE ................................................................................................................33 ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatic CT Enhancement: Comparison Between Dimeric And
    J Korean Radiol Soc 2003;48:479-483 Hepatic CT Enhancement: Comparison between Dimeric and Monomeric Nonionic Contrast Agents in Rabbits1 Gi Hyeon Kim, M.D., Byung Kook Kwak, M.D., Hyung Jin Shim, M.D., Kyo Nam Kim, M.D.2, Wei Chiang Liu, M.D.3, Seung Hoon Ryu, M.D., Yang Soo Kim, M.D., Jong Beum Lee, M.D., Kun Sang Kim, M.D. Purpose: To determine the hepatic and vascular enhancement profiles with nonionic dimeric, iodixanol, contrast agent in the rabbit and to compare them with nonionic monomeric, ioversol, contrast agent. Materials and Methods: Seven rabbits initially underwent hepatic dynamic CT scan with either iodixanol or ioversol, followed by repeated CT scan with other unused con- trast agent with one week interval between scans. Pre and post contrast attenuation values of hepatic parenchyma, aorta and portal vein were measured sequentially. The mean enhancement of the hepatic parenchyma, aorta and portal vein were compared between two agents. The mean peak enhancement and peak enhancement time of the liver, aorta, and portal vein were also compared. Results: The attenuation values of ioversol showed a greater mean hepatic enhance- ment than iodixanol from 18 seconds to 39 seconds after injection (from late arterial phase to early portal venous phase) with a statistical significance (p<0.05). The mean peak enhancement of hepatic parenchyma, aorta and portal vein was also greater us- ing ioversol than iodixanol, but the mean peak enhancement times of ioversol and iodixanol were nearly identical. Conclusion: Ioversol may have the greater effects than iodixanol on hepatic tumor conspicuity, especially from late arterial phase to early portal veneous phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Injection of Contrast Media V7 – 2010 13 5
    ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 8 2012 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 8 2012 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media © Copyright 2012 American College of Radiology ISBN: 978-1-55903-009-0 Table of Contents Topic Last Updated Page 1. Preface. V8 – 2012 . 3 2. Introduction . V7 – 2010 . 4 3. Patient Selection and Preparation Strategies . V7 – 2010 . 5 4. Injection of Contrast Media . V7 – 2010 . 13 5. Extravasation of Contrast Media . V7 – 2010 . 17 6. Adverse Events After Intravascular Iodinated Contrast Media . V8 – 2012 . 21 Administration 7. Contrast Media Warming . V8 – 2012 . 29 8. Contrast-Induced Nephrotoxicity . V8 – 2012 . 33 9. Metformin . V7 – 2010 . 43 10. Contrast Media in Children . V7 – 2010 . 47 11. Iodinated Gastrointestinal Contrast Media in Adults: Indications . V7 – 2010 . 55 and Guidelines 12. Adverse Reactions to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media . V7 – 2010 . 59 13. Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) . V8 – 2012 . 63 14. Treatment of Contrast Reactions . V8 – 2012 . 73 15. Administration of Contrast Media to Pregnant or Potentially . V6 – 2008. 75 Pregnant Patients 16. Administration of Contrast Media to Breast-Feeding Mothers . V6 – 2008 . 79 Table 1 – Indications for Use of Iodinated Contrast Media . V6 – 2008 . 81 Table 2 – Organ or System-Specific Adverse Effects from the Administration . V7 – 2010 . 82 of Iodine-Based or Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Table 3 – Categories of Reactions . V7 – 2010 . 83 Table 4 – Management of Acute Reactions in Children . V7 – 2010 . 84 Table 5 – Management of Acute Reactions in Adults . V6 – 2008 . 86 Table 6 – Equipment for Emergency Carts . V6 – 2008 .
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 10.0 Index 1. General Notices
    EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 10.0 Index 1. General notices......................................................................... 3 2.2.66. Detection and measurement of radioactivity........... 119 2.1. Apparatus ............................................................................. 15 2.2.7. Optical rotation................................................................ 26 2.1.1. Droppers ........................................................................... 15 2.2.8. Viscosity ............................................................................ 27 2.1.2. Comparative table of porosity of sintered-glass filters.. 15 2.2.9. Capillary viscometer method ......................................... 27 2.1.3. Ultraviolet ray lamps for analytical purposes............... 15 2.3. Identification...................................................................... 129 2.1.4. Sieves ................................................................................. 16 2.3.1. Identification reactions of ions and functional 2.1.5. Tubes for comparative tests ............................................ 17 groups ...................................................................................... 129 2.1.6. Gas detector tubes............................................................ 17 2.3.2. Identification of fatty oils by thin-layer 2.2. Physical and physico-chemical methods.......................... 21 chromatography...................................................................... 132 2.2.1. Clarity and degree of opalescence of
    [Show full text]