DOCSLIB.ORG

Delayed Adverse Reaction to Contrast-Enhanced CT: CONSTRAST MEDIA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delayed Adverse Reaction to Contrast-Enhanced CT: CONSTRAST MEDIA Note: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, contact us at www.rsna.org/rsnarights. Delayed Adverse Reaction to Contrast-enhanced CT: CONSTRAST MEDIA n A Prospective Single-Center Study Comparison to Control Group without Enhancement 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Shaun Loh , MD , MBA Purpose: To prospectively assess the incidence of delayed adverse Sepideh Bagheri , MD reactions (DARs) in patients undergoing contrast material– Richard W. Katzberg , MD enhanced computed tomography (CT) with the low osmo- Maxwell A. Fung , MD lar nonionic contrast agent iohexol and compare with the Chin-Shang Li , PhD incidence of DARs in patients undergoing unenhanced CT as control subjects. Materials and Institutional review board approval and informed written Methods: consent for this prospective study were obtained. The study was HIPAA compliant. Patients undergoing CT for routine indications were enrolled from a random next-available scheduling template by an on-site clinical trials monitor. All subjects received a questionnaire asking them to indicate any DAR occurring later than 1 hour after their examina- tion. Sixteen manifestations were listed and included rash, skin redness, skin swelling, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness, among others. To ensure maximal surveillance, a clinical tri- als coordinator initiated direct telephone contact for further assessment. Patients suspected of having moderately severe cutaneous reactions were invited to return for a complete dermatologic clinical assessment including skin biopsy, if in- dicated. Statistical analysis was performed by using a two- sided Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, a logistic regression utilizing a x 2 test to adjust for sex and age, and a two-sided Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 539 patients (258 receiving iohexol and 281 not receiving contrast material) were enrolled. DARs were observed in 37 (14.3%) of 258 subjects receiving iohexol and in seven (2.5%) of 281 subjects in the control group ( P , .0001, x 2 test) after adjusting for sex and age. Specifi c manifestations of DARs that were signifi cantly more frequent at contrast-enhanced CT were skin rash ( P = .0311), skin redness ( P = .0055), skin swelling ( P = .0117), and headache ( P = .0246). DARs involving the skin included generalized rashes of the face, neck, chest, back, and extremities and were often associated with swelling, erythema, and pruritus. 1 From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (S.L., Conclusion: This study substantiates a frequent occurrence of DARs at R.W.K.), Dermatology (S.B., M.A.F.), Pathology (M.A.F.), and Biostatistics (C.S.L.), University of California, Davis Medical contrast-enhanced CT compared with that in control sub- Center, 4860 Y St, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817. jects. Continued growth in the use of contrast-enhanced From the 2009 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received October 4, CT suggests a need for greater awareness and attention to 2009; revision requested November 13; revision received prevention and management. November 23; accepted December 10; fi nal version ac- q cepted December 17. Address correspondence to S.L. RSNA, 2010 (e-mail: [email protected] ). Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup q RSNA, 2010 /suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10091848/-/DC1 764 radiology.rsna.org n Radiology: Volume 255: Number 3—June 2010 CONSTRAST MEDIA: Delayed Adverse Reaction at CT Loh et al elayed adverse reactions (DARs) Trying to defi ne the actual occurrence effects with DARs in patients undergo- resulting from the parenteral of late reactions has been diffi cult, and ing unenhanced CT as control subjects. administration of iodinated con- the reported incidence for late reactions D trast agents are more common than to monomeric nonionic low osmolar Materials and Methods previously appreciated. The defi nition contrast media varies from 1% to 23% of DARs has varied somewhat but usu- ( 3 ). In addition, there is the so-called Bracco Diagnostics (Princeton, NJ) has ally means adverse events that begin 1 background noise, whereby anywhere provided fi nancial support for this study. hour or longer after the administration from 3% to 12% of surveyed subjects The authors had control of the data and of the contrast agent. The majority oc- undergoing unenhanced computed to- information submitted for publication. cur 6–12 hours after initial contrast mography (CT) reported adverse re- Our study was approved by the institu- material injection. Other than contrast actions. Indeed, in our survey of the tional review board, and informed writ- material–induced nephropathy, DARs literature, there were only two prospec- ten consent was obtained from each that are of most frequent concern are tive studies ( 4,5 ) that examined DARs patient participating in the study. The cutaneous. The incidence of delayed and compared patients receiving intra- study was Health Insurance Portability adverse cutaneous reactions has been venous contrast material with a similar and Accountability Act compliant. This reported to range from 0.5% to 9%, population undergoing CT examination prospective surveillance was conducted of which some are moderate to severe without contrast material. Interestingly, over the course of 2 years (2006–2008) in distribution and associated symp- these studies showed no overall differ- at a tertiary academic medical center toms ( 1 ). These reactions are often not ence between the subjects receiving and included patients who were re- brought to the attention of the radiolo- intravenous contrast material and the ferred for chest, abdominal, pelvic, gist and are ascribed to other causes control group relative to the occurrence head, neck, or extremity CT with or because contrast agents have a biologic of DARs. Schild et al ( 5 ), however, did without contrast material administra- half-time of only about 1½ hours, are report that delayed adverse cutaneous tion. Patients were excluded if they (a) too small to function unbound as anti- events were noted signifi cantly ( P , were younger than 18 years old, (b) gens, and are minimally protein bound. .05) more often with a dimeric nonionic were pregnant or lactating, (c) had a Because many radiologists are unaware agent than with a monomeric nonionic prior moderate-to-severe adverse reac- that such reactions occur, DARs are of- contrast agent. tion to contrast media, (d) had renal ten mistakenly thought to be caused by The purpose of this prospective clin- dysfunction, (e) had previously partici- another inciting agent. ical surveillance study was to assess the pated in a similar study, (f) were sched- There have been a relatively small incidence of DARs in patients undergo- uled for CT with injection of a contrast number of prospective studies that have ing contrast-enhanced CT with the mo- medium other than iohexol (350 mg of examined the incidence and character- nomeric nonionic low osmolar contrast iodine per milliliter), and (g) anticipated istics of DARs; the fi rst was by Panto material iohexol and to compare these not being available for telephone con- and Davies in 1986 ( 2 ), who reported tact or were unwilling to complete the 5% of subjects experiencing a rash and 14% showing a variety of other reac- Implications for Patient Care tions to high osmolar contrast media. n DARs to contrast-enhanced CT Published online before print occur more often than is gener- 10.1148/radiol.10091848 Advances in Knowledge ally recognized, may be moderate Radiology 2010; 255:764–771 n In this prospective surveillance of in severity, and are often subjects undergoing contrast- ascribed to causes other than Abbreviation: DAR = delayed adverse reaction enhanced CT, we observed a sig- contrast media. nifi cantly ( P , .0001) higher rate n Given the continual and dramatic Author contributions: of delayed adverse reactions increase in the utilization of Guarantors of integrity of entire study, S.L., S.B., R.W.K.; (DARs) in subjects receiving non- contrast-enhanced CT, the impli- study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting or ionic monomeric low osmolar cations are for a substantial manuscript revision for important intellectual content, all contrast material (14.3% [37 of occurrence of patient morbidity authors; manuscript fi nal version approval, all authors; 258]) than in a CT control group in need of clinical strategies for literature research, S.L., S.B., R.W.K., M.A.F.; clinical that did not receive contrast treatment. studies, S.B., R.W.K., M.A.F.; statistical analysis, S.L., S.B., C.S.L.; and manuscript editing, S.L., S.B., R.W.K., M.A.F. material (2.5% [seven of 281]). n Our fi ndings should alert radiolo- n The most commonly observed gists about the common occur- Funding: DARs were cutaneous in nature, rence of DARs secondary to This research was supported by the National Center for may be moderate in severity and contrast-enhanced CT and raise Research Resources (grant no. UL1 RR024146) and the Na- duration, and may require the level of awareness of the tional Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research. treatment. referring clinicians. See Materials and Methods for pertinent disclosures. Radiology: Volume 255: Number 3—June 2010 n radiology.rsna.org 765 CONSTRAST MEDIA: Delayed Adverse Reaction at CT Loh et al mail-in questionnaire. After a patient Figure 1 was deemed eligible for participation in the study, the study was described in full, and informed written consent was obtained by a clinical trials moni- tor during regular working hours and during evening hours and weekends by another clinical trials monitor who was employed for 3 months at the midpoint of the study. The patients were ran- domly included in the study. Each pa- tient was approached sequentially and was invited to participate, with each of the daily imaging sessions having been determined by schedulers unaware of the study and routinely employing a next-available scheduling template.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MDCT and Contrast Media: What Are the Risks?
    071_078_00_Thomsen:Thomsen 13-02-2008 9:32 Pagina 71 MDCT and Contrast Media: What are the Risks? Henrik S. Thomsen Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Introduction Renal Adverse Reactions With the advent of multi-detector computed to- Contrast-material-induced kidney damage is imme- mography (MDCT) technology, the number of pa- diate, starting as soon as the first CM molecule reach- tients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) es the kidney; however, it takes several hours or days studies has steadily grown in the last 6 years. In for a deterioration of renal function to be detected. 2005, approximately 22 million CECT examinations Despite more than 30 years of research, the patho- were carried out in the European Union, and 32 mil- physiology of CM-induced nephropathy (CIN) is lion in the United States (The Imaging Market Guide poorly elucidated. Nonetheless, several risk factors 2005. Arlington Medical Resources, Inc., Philadel- are well-known and can be divided into CM- and pa- phia, PA). Unfortunately, post-contrast-material-re- tient-related factors. lated adverse events, i.e., all those unintended and unfavorable signs, symptoms, or diseases temporally associated with the use of an iodinated contrast ma- Contrast-Medium-Related Factors terial (CM), are a common occurrence in radiology departments. Most adverse events occur within the More than 25 years ago, Barrett and Carlisle [1] first 60 min following CM administration (“imme- showed that the incidence of CIN is significantly diate” or “acute” adverse events), with the greatest higher after the administration of high-osmolarity risk in the first 20 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacologyonline 2: 727-753 (2010) Ewsletter Bradu and Rossini
    Pharmacologyonline 2: 727-753 (2010) ewsletter Bradu and Rossini COTRAST AGETS - IODIATED PRODUCTS. SECOD WHO-ITA / ITA-OMS 2010 COTRIBUTIO O AGGREGATE WHO SYSTEM-ORGA CLASS DISORDERS AD/OR CLUSTERIG BASED O REPORTED ADVERSE REACTIOS/EVETS Dan Bradu and Luigi Rossini* Servizio Nazionale Collaborativo WHO-ITA / ITA-OMS, Università Politecnica delle Marche e Progetto di Farmacotossicovigilanza, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Regione Marche, Italia Summary From the 2010 total basic adverse reactions and events collected as ADRs preferred names in the WHO-Uppsala Drug Monitoring Programme, subdivided in its first two twenty years periods as for the first seven iodinated products diagnostic contrast agents amidotrizoate, iodamide, iotalamate, iodoxamate, ioxaglate, iohexsol and iopamidol, their 30 WHO-system organ class disorders (SOCDs) aggregates had been compared. Their common maximum 97% levels identified six SOCDs only, apt to evaluate the most frequent single ADRs for each class, and their percentual normalization profiles for each product. The WILKS's chi square statistics for the related contingency tables, and Gabriel’s STP procedure applied to the extracted double data sets then produced profile binary clustering, as well as Euclidean confirmatory plots. They finally showed similar objectively evaluated autoclassificative trends of these products, which do not completely correspond to their actual ATC V08A A, B and C subdivision: while amidotrizoate and iotalamate, and respectively iohesol and iopamidol are confirmed to belong to the A and B subgroups, ioxaglate behaves fluctuating within A, B and C, but iodamide looks surprizingly, constantly positioned together with iodoxamate as binary/ternary C associated. In view of the recent work of Campillos et al (Science, 2008) which throws light on the subject, the above discrepancies do not appear anymore unexpected or alarming.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Note: Within Nine Months from the Publication of the Mention
    Europäisches Patentamt (19) European Patent Office & Office européen des brevets (11) EP 1 411 992 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A61K 49/04 (2006.01) A61K 49/18 (2006.01) 13.12.2006 Bulletin 2006/50 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 02758379.8 PCT/EP2002/008183 (22) Date of filing: 23.07.2002 (87) International publication number: WO 2003/013616 (20.02.2003 Gazette 2003/08) (54) IONIC AND NON-IONIC RADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST AGENTS FOR USE IN COMBINED X-RAY AND NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE DIAGNOSTICS IONISCHES UND NICHT-IONISCHES RADIOGRAPHISCHES KONTRASTMITTEL ZUR VERWENDUNG IN DER KOMBINIERTEN ROENTGEN- UND KERNSPINTOMOGRAPHIEDIAGNOSTIK SUBSTANCES IONIQUES ET NON-IONIQUES DE CONTRASTE RADIOGRAPHIQUE UTILISEES POUR ETABLIR DES DIAGNOSTICS FAISANT APPEL AUX RAYONS X ET A L’IMAGERIE PAR RESONANCE MAGNETIQUE (84) Designated Contracting States: (74) Representative: Minoja, Fabrizio AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Bianchetti Bracco Minoja S.r.l. IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR Via Plinio, 63 20129 Milano (IT) (30) Priority: 03.08.2001 IT MI20011706 (56) References cited: (43) Date of publication of application: EP-A- 0 759 785 WO-A-00/75141 28.04.2004 Bulletin 2004/18 US-A- 5 648 536 (73) Proprietor: BRACCO IMAGING S.p.A. • K HERGAN, W. DORINGER, M. LÄNGLE W.OSER: 20134 Milano (IT) "Effects of iodinated contrast agents in MR imaging" EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF (72) Inventors: RADIOLOGY, vol. 21, 1995, pages 11-17, • AIME, Silvio XP002227102 20134 Milano (IT) • K.M.
    [Show full text]
  • ACR Manual on Contrast Media
    ACR Manual On Contrast Media 2021 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media Preface 2 ACR Manual on Contrast Media 2021 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media © Copyright 2021 American College of Radiology ISBN: 978-1-55903-012-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page 1. Preface 1 2. Version History 2 3. Introduction 4 4. Patient Selection and Preparation Strategies Before Contrast 5 Medium Administration 5. Fasting Prior to Intravascular Contrast Media Administration 14 6. Safe Injection of Contrast Media 15 7. Extravasation of Contrast Media 18 8. Allergic-Like And Physiologic Reactions to Intravascular 22 Iodinated Contrast Media 9. Contrast Media Warming 29 10. Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury and Contrast 33 Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Adults 11. Metformin 45 12. Contrast Media in Children 48 13. Gastrointestinal (GI) Contrast Media in Adults: Indications and 57 Guidelines 14. ACR–ASNR Position Statement On the Use of Gadolinium 78 Contrast Agents 15. Adverse Reactions To Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media 79 16. Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) 83 17. Ultrasound Contrast Media 92 18. Treatment of Contrast Reactions 95 19. Administration of Contrast Media to Pregnant or Potentially 97 Pregnant Patients 20. Administration of Contrast Media to Women Who are Breast- 101 Feeding Table 1 – Categories Of Acute Reactions 103 Table 2 – Treatment Of Acute Reactions To Contrast Media In 105 Children Table 3 – Management Of Acute Reactions To Contrast Media In 114 Adults Table 4 – Equipment For Contrast Reaction Kits In Radiology 122 Appendix A – Contrast Media Specifications 124 PREFACE This edition of the ACR Manual on Contrast Media replaces all earlier editions.
    [Show full text]
  • ACR Manual on Contrast Media – Version 9, 2013 Table of Contents / I
    ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 9 2013 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media ACR Manual on Contrast Media – Version 9, 2013 Table of Contents / i ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 9 2013 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media © Copyright 2013 American College of Radiology ISBN: 978-1-55903-012-0 Table of Contents Topic Last Updated Page 1. Preface. V9 – 2013 . 3 2. Introduction . V7 – 2010 . 4 3. Patient Selection And Preparation Strategies . V7 – 2010 . 5 4. Injection of Contrast Media . V7 – 2010 . 13 5. Extravasation Of Contrast Media . V7 – 2010 . 17 6. Allergic-Like And Physiologic Reactions To Intravascular Iodinated Contrast Media . V9 – 2013 . 21 7. Contrast Media Warming . V8 – 2012 . 29 8. Contrast-Induced Nephrotoxicity . V8 – 2012 . 33 9. Metformin . V7 – 2010 . 43 10. Contrast Media In Children . V7 – 2010 . 47 11. Gastrointestinal (GI) Contrast Media In Adults: Indications And Guidelines V9 – 2013 . 55 12. Adverse Reactions To Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media . V7 – 2010 . 77 13. Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis . V8 – 2012 . 81 14. Treatment Of Contrast Reactions . V9 – 2013 . 91 15. Administration Of Contrast Media To Pregnant Or Potentially Pregnant Patients . V9 – 2013 . 93 16. Administration Of Contrast Media To Women Who Are Breast-Feeding . V9 – 2013 . 97 Table 1 – Indications for Use of Iodinated Contrast Media . V9 – 2013 . 99 Table 2 – Organ and System-Specific Adverse Effects from the Administration of Iodine-Based or Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. V9 – 2013 . 100 Table 3 – Categories of Acute Reactions . V9 – 2013 . 101 Table 4 – Treatment of Acute Reactions to Contrast Media in Children . V9 – 2013 .
    [Show full text]
  • Ehealth DSI [Ehdsi V2.2.2-OR] Ehealth DSI – Master Value Set
    MTC eHealth DSI [eHDSI v2.2.2-OR] eHealth DSI – Master Value Set Catalogue Responsible : eHDSI Solution Provider PublishDate : Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 1 of 490 MTC Table of Contents epSOSActiveIngredient 4 epSOSAdministrativeGender 148 epSOSAdverseEventType 149 epSOSAllergenNoDrugs 150 epSOSBloodGroup 155 epSOSBloodPressure 156 epSOSCodeNoMedication 157 epSOSCodeProb 158 epSOSConfidentiality 159 epSOSCountry 160 epSOSDisplayLabel 167 epSOSDocumentCode 170 epSOSDoseForm 171 epSOSHealthcareProfessionalRoles 184 epSOSIllnessesandDisorders 186 epSOSLanguage 448 epSOSMedicalDevices 458 epSOSNullFavor 461 epSOSPackage 462 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 2 of 490 MTC epSOSPersonalRelationship 464 epSOSPregnancyInformation 466 epSOSProcedures 467 epSOSReactionAllergy 470 epSOSResolutionOutcome 472 epSOSRoleClass 473 epSOSRouteofAdministration 474 epSOSSections 477 epSOSSeverity 478 epSOSSocialHistory 479 epSOSStatusCode 480 epSOSSubstitutionCode 481 epSOSTelecomAddress 482 epSOSTimingEvent 483 epSOSUnits 484 epSOSUnknownInformation 487 epSOSVaccine 488 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 3 of 490 MTC epSOSActiveIngredient epSOSActiveIngredient Value Set ID 1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.10.1.3.1.42.24 TRANSLATIONS Code System ID Code System Version Concept Code Description (FSN) 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01 A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Contrast Media Viscosity Versus Osmolality in Kidney Injury: Lessons from Animal Studies
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International Volume 2014, Article ID 358136, 15 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/358136 Review Article Contrast Media Viscosity versus Osmolality in Kidney Injury: Lessons from Animal Studies Erdmann Seeliger, Diana C. Lenhard, and Pontus B. Persson Institute of Physiology and Center for Cardiovascular Research, Charite-University´ Medicine Berlin, Campus Mitte, Hessische Straße 3-4, 10115 Berlin, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to Erdmann Seeliger; [email protected] Received 18 October 2013; Accepted 29 December 2013; Published 23 February 2014 Academic Editor: Richard Solomon Copyright © 2014 Erdmann Seeliger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Iodinated contrast media (CM) can induce acute kidney injury (AKI). CM share common iodine-related cytotoxic features but differ considerably with regard to osmolality and viscosity. Meta-analyses of clinical trials generally failed to reveal renal safety differences of modern CM with regard to these physicochemical properties. While most trials’ reliance on serum creatinine as outcome measure contributes to this lack of clinical evidence, it largely relies on the nature of prospective clinical trials: effective prophylaxis by ample hydration must be employed. In everyday life, patients are often not well hydrated; here we lack clinical data. However, preclinical studies that directly measured glomerular filtration rate, intrarenal perfusion and oxygenation, and various markers of AKI have shown that the viscosity of CM is of vast importance. In the renal tubules, CM become enriched, as water is reabsorbed, but CM are not.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 10.0 Index 1. General Notices
    EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 10.0 Index 1. General notices......................................................................... 3 2.2.66. Detection and measurement of radioactivity........... 119 2.1. Apparatus ............................................................................. 15 2.2.7. Optical rotation................................................................ 26 2.1.1. Droppers ........................................................................... 15 2.2.8. Viscosity ............................................................................ 27 2.1.2. Comparative table of porosity of sintered-glass filters.. 15 2.2.9. Capillary viscometer method ......................................... 27 2.1.3. Ultraviolet ray lamps for analytical purposes............... 15 2.3. Identification...................................................................... 129 2.1.4. Sieves ................................................................................. 16 2.3.1. Identification reactions of ions and functional 2.1.5. Tubes for comparative tests ............................................ 17 groups ...................................................................................... 129 2.1.6. Gas detector tubes............................................................ 17 2.3.2. Identification of fatty oils by thin-layer 2.2. Physical and physico-chemical methods.......................... 21 chromatography...................................................................... 132 2.2.1. Clarity and degree of opalescence of
    [Show full text]
  • The Risk of Contrast Media-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation Is Low in Canine Coronary Arteriography with Ioxilan
    FULL PAPER Surgery The Risk of Contrast Media-Induced Ventricular Fibrillation is Low in Canine Coronary Arteriography with Ioxilan Kazuhiro MISUMI, Oki TATENO, Makoto FUJIKI, Naoki MIURA and Hiroshi SAKAMOTO Department of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, 21–24 Korimoto 1-chome, Kagoshima 890–0065, Japan (Received 5 August 1999/Accepted 28 December 1999) ABSTRACT. Previous studies have proposed that sodium supplement to nonionic contrast media (CM) can decrease the risk of ventricular fibrillation (VF). This study was designed to compare the occurence of VF induced by ioxilan (containing 9 mmol/LNa+) with other nonionic CMs. After wedging a catheter in the right coronary artery, test solutions including ioxilan, ioversol, iomeprol, and iopromide were infused for 30 sec at the rate of 0.4 ml/sec or until VF occurred. Then, incidence of VF, contact time (i.e. the time required to produce VF), and QTc were measured. Also, the CMs other than ioxilan were investigated at sodium levels adjusted to 9 and 20 mmol/L Na+. The incidence of VF with ioxilan (0% ) was the lowest of all. In the other CMs, the incidence decreased in accordance with increase of sodium. Iomeprol and iopromide showed significant reduction of VF incidence at the sodium level of 20 mmol/L. The higher sodium supplements also prolonged the contact times. The increase of QTc was the greatest in ioxilan. Ioxilan has the least arrythmogenic property among the current low-osmolality nonionic CMs. This property might be attributable to an optimal sodium concentration of 9 mmol/L in the CM.—KEY WORDS: contrast media, coronary arteriography, ioxilan, ventricular fibrillation.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Listing of ATC Drugs & Codes
    Alphabetical Listing of ATC drugs & codes. Introduction This file is an alphabetical listing of ATC codes as supplied to us in November 1999. It is supplied free as a service to those who care about good medicine use by mSupply support. To get an overview of the ATC system, use the “ATC categories.pdf” document also alvailable from www.msupply.org.nz Thanks to the WHO collaborating centre for Drug Statistics & Methodology, Norway, for supplying the raw data. I have intentionally supplied these files as PDFs so that they are not quite so easily manipulated and redistributed. I am told there is no copyright on the files, but it still seems polite to ask before using other people’s work, so please contact <[email protected]> for permission before asking us for text files. mSupply support also distributes mSupply software for inventory control, which has an inbuilt system for reporting on medicine usage using the ATC system You can download a full working version from www.msupply.org.nz Craig Drown, mSupply Support <[email protected]> April 2000 A (2-benzhydryloxyethyl)diethyl-methylammonium iodide A03AB16 0.3 g O 2-(4-chlorphenoxy)-ethanol D01AE06 4-dimethylaminophenol V03AB27 Abciximab B01AC13 25 mg P Absorbable gelatin sponge B02BC01 Acadesine C01EB13 Acamprosate V03AA03 2 g O Acarbose A10BF01 0.3 g O Acebutolol C07AB04 0.4 g O,P Acebutolol and thiazides C07BB04 Aceclidine S01EB08 Aceclidine, combinations S01EB58 Aceclofenac M01AB16 0.2 g O Acefylline piperazine R03DA09 Acemetacin M01AB11 Acenocoumarol B01AA07 5 mg O Acepromazine N05AA04
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Properties of X-Ray Contrast Media
    STRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF X-RAY CONTRAST MEDIA Optimal use of CM in radiology requires a knowl- edge of the nature and relevant properties of the available substances. This chapter describes the properties of currently used and newly developed contrast-giving agents that infuence their behav- ior in the human body, their side effects, and their practical utility. The main X-ray contrast agents in use today are insoluble barium sulfate for the diagnostic evalu- ation of the GI tract and water-soluble CM for the radiological assessment of the different vascular systems, body cavities and organs. In addition, a water-soluble CM based on tri-iodobenzene is the alternative agent of choice for oral use when bari- um sulfate is contraindicated. Barium Sulfate Barium is used in the form of the insoluble sulfate for radiography of the GI tract. If perforation is suspected, however, only water-soluble, iodinated agents (Gastrografn, Ultravist-370) can be used since the body is virtually incapable of eliminating barium sulfate once it has entered the peritoneum. Barium sulfate is available either as a powder to be prepared directly before use or as a ready-to-use suspension. For double-contrast examinations (fll- ing of the lumen with gas, coating of the wall with barium sulfate), barium sulfate is either mixed with a carbon dioxide additive, or a gas-forming agent is taken in addition. © The Author(s) 2018 20 U. Speck, X-Ray Contrast Media, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56465-3_3 Common to all barium preparations is concentra- tion of barium sulfate which may diluted according to the needs of the examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy Data Management Drug Exception List
    Pharmacy Data Management Drug Exception List Patch PSS*1*127 updated the following drugs with the listed NCPDP Multiplier and NCPDP Dispense Unit. These two fields were added as part of this patch to the DRUG file (#50). Please refer to the Release notes for ePharmacy/ECME Enhancements for Pharmacy Release Notes (BPS_1_5_EPHARMACY_RN_0907.PDF) on the VistA Documentation Library (VDL). The IEN column reflects the IEN for the VA PRODUCT file (#50.68). The ePharmacy Change Control Board provided the following list of drugs with the specified NCPDP Multiplier and NCPDP Dispense Unit values. This listing was used to update the DRUG file (#50) with a post install routine in the PSS*1*127 patch. NCPDP File 50.68 NCPDP Dispense IEN Product Name Multiplier Unit 2 ATROPINE SO4 0.4MG/ML INJ 1.00 ML 3 ATROPINE SO4 1% OINT,OPH 3.50 GM 6 ATROPINE SO4 1% SOLN,OPH 1.00 ML 7 ATROPINE SO4 0.5% OINT,OPH 3.50 GM 8 ATROPINE SO4 0.5% SOLN,OPH 1.00 ML 9 ATROPINE SO4 3% SOLN,OPH 1.00 ML 10 ATROPINE SO4 2% SOLN,OPH 1.00 ML 11 ATROPINE SO4 0.1MG/ML INJ 1.00 ML 12 ATROPINE SO4 0.05MG/ML INJ 1.00 ML 13 ATROPINE SO4 0.4MG/0.5ML INJ 1.00 ML 14 ATROPINE SO4 0.5MG/ML INJ 1.00 ML 15 ATROPINE SO4 1MG/ML INJ 1.00 ML 16 ATROPINE SO4 2MG/ML INJ 1.00 ML 18 ATROPINE SO4 2MG/0.7ML INJ 0.70 ML 21 ATROPINE SO4 0.3MG/ML INJ 1.00 ML 22 ATROPINE SO4 0.8MG/ML INJ 1.00 ML 23 ATROPINE SO4 0.1MG/ML INJ,SYRINGE,5ML 5.00 ML 24 ATROPINE SO4 0.1MG/ML INJ,SYRINGE,10ML 10.00 ML 25 ATROPINE SO4 1MG/ML INJ,AMP,1ML 1.00 ML 26 ATROPINE SO4 0.2MG/0.5ML INJ,AMP,0.5ML 0.50 ML 30 CODEINE PO4 30MG/ML
    [Show full text]