DOCSLIB.ORG

Challenges Faced by China Compared with the US in Developing Wind Power

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Challenges Faced by China Compared with the US in Developing Wind Power Challenges faced by China compared with the US in developing wind power The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Lu, Xi, Michael B. McElroy, Wei Peng, Shiyang Liu, Chris P. Nielsen, and Haikun Wang. 2016. “Challenges Faced by China Compared with the US in Developing Wind Power.” Nat. Energy 1 (6) (May 23): 16061. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.61. Published Version 10.1038/nenergy.2016.61 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27738636 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Challenges Faced by China Compared with the US in Developing Wind Power Xi Lu1,2,*, Michael B. McElroy2,3,*, Wei Peng4, Shiyang Liu5, Chris P. Nielsen2, Haikun Wang6 Affiliations: 1 School of Environment and State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing 10084, P.R. China 2 Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. 4Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 5National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P.R. China 6State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, P.R. China *Correspondence to: [email protected], [email protected] 1 Abstract In the 21st Conference of the Parties held in Paris in December 2015, China pledged to peak its carbon emissions and increase non-fossil energy to 20% by 2030 or earlier. Expanding renewable capacity, especially wind power, is a central strategy to achieve these climate goals. Despite greater capacity for wind installation in China compared to the US (114.7 vs. 65.9 GW), less wind electricity is generated in China (153.4 vs. 181.8 TWh). Here, we quantify the relative importance of the key factors accounting for the unsatisfactory performance of Chinese wind farms. Different from qualitative studies, we find that the difference in wind resources explains only a small fraction of the current US-China difference in wind power output (-17.9% in 2012); the curtailment of wind power, differences in turbine quality and delayed connection to the grid are identified as the three primary factors (respectively -49.3%, -50.2%, and -50.3% in 2012). Improvements in both technology choices and the policy environment are critical in addressing these challenges. ** Main text China and the US are the top two CO2 emitters in the world, together accounting for 45.6% of the global total1. Carbon mitigation efforts by these two countries are thus critical for curbing global climate change2,3. In the landmark US-China climate deal announced in November 2014 and the more recently concluded 21st Conference of the Parties at Paris (https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/25/fact-sheet-united-states-and-china-i 2 ssue-joint-presidential-statement), China pledged to peak its carbon emissions by 2030 or earlier, and to increase low-carbon energy to 20% in its total primary energy mix; the US committed to cut its carbon emissions by 26-28% relative to the 2005 level, following earlier announced long-term target for 2050 to lower its emissions by 83% relative to 2005. Among all the low-carbon technology choices, wind power development is a central strategy for both countries to achieve their climate goals. The US pioneered in the development of wind-powered generation of electricity in the 1980’s and early 1990’s. It lost its lead to Europe in the late 1990’s as cheap oil, coal and gas reduced incentives for US utilities to invest in alternative sources of energy. The US has emerged once again, since the 1990s, as a major player in global wind power development, in part in response to the production tax credit (PTC) incentive introduced in 19924. China, in comparison, has experienced a rapid scale-up of wind power capacity since the passage of the Renewable Energy Law in 2005, and has become the world’s top wind installer since 2010. The wind installation target set in 2006 for 2020 (30GW) was already exceeded by nearly 400% by the end of 2015 (145.1 GW)5,6. China currently accounts for 33.6% of total global installed wind capacity, with US ranking second (17.2%)7. Despite greater total installed capacity, the actual wind-generated electricity output is in China less than in the US (Figure 1). The unsatisfactory performance of Chinese wind farms not only harms the profitability of existing wind investments, but also reduces the economic attractiveness of future investments. 3 Figure 1 A comparison of wind power deployment for China and the US from 2000 to 2014. a) Installed capacity and b) wind-generated electricity. Data were derived from “Global Wind Statistics 2014” edited by the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC)5. Based on qualitative methods, previous studies indicated a variety of factors that may contribute to the Chinese shortfall: wind power resources may be intrinsically less favorable in China than in the US8,9; the time lag may be longer in China to connect wind farms to the grid10-13; the quality of turbines installed in China may be inferior to those installed in the US 13-15; in addition, for reasons specific for China, wind power curtailment is more pervasive due to an inflexible power generation fleet dominated by coal16-18. Yet the relative importance of these contributing factors is methodologically challenging to quantify. Here we propose a method based on a logarithmic-mean-divisia-index (LMDI) approach19 to quantify their relative importance, and introduce a new parameter to characterise the overall quality of wind turbines. We find that, although the national total wind resources are less favorable in China 4 than in the contiguous US, the available wind resources for the installed wind farms in these two countries are comparable. Our results suggest that curtailment of wind power, differences in turbine quality and delayed connection to the grid are the primary factors accounting for the current US-China difference. Key Factors Determining Wind Energy Production The annual total electricity output from installed wind farms can be calculated as the product of total capacity (C), the fraction of installed capacity connected to the grid (G), the potential capacity factor for wind resources (CFest), the virtual turbine quality (Q), the curtailment rate (Cr) and the total hours of year (see equation 2 in Methods). A methodology to evaluate the overall quality of wind turbines that have been installed is missing in existing literature, despite its significance for the design of future wind development strategies. We introduce therefore a parameter (Q) to characterise the overall quality of existing wind turbines, comparing the actual output with the counterfactual performance if GE 2.5 MW turbines were installed instead. Q is a composite factor reflecting primarily turbine quality, but is affected also by the technical limits on the deployment and operation of wind farms. We use the LMDI decomposition approach to quantify the relative contributions of these factors, in order to explain the discrepancy in wind power output in China as compared to the US for the year of 2012. As illustrated in Figure 2, on the one hand the total capacity of wind farms installed in China exceeds that in the US, which should lead to greater wind-generated electricity in China relative to the US (67.7%); on the other hand, the advantage of greater installed capacity in China is more than offset by the combined effects of delayed 5 grid-connection (negative 50.3%), less favorable wind resources (negative 17.9%) and lower quality of wind turbines (negative 50.2%). China’s high curtailment rate for wind power (negative 49.3%) further reduces the actual wind power generation. In total, wind-generated electricity in China is 39.3 TWh less than that in the US. With other factors fixed, curtailment of wind power in China would contribute to such shortage by 19.37 TWh, the magnitude for which is comparable to the total electricity generated from wind in Canada in 20125. A thorough understanding of the differences in the above-mentioned factors requires further discussion in a broader technical and policy context both for China and for the US. Figure 2 Contribution of different factors in explaining the China-US difference in wind power output. By the scale of the vertical axis, the red bar indicates the total difference of -39.3 TWh of wind-generated electricity in China as compared to the US in 2012, with percentages representing the relative contributions to this difference from the different factors (blue bars). Thus, 50.3%, 17.9%, 50.2% and 49.3% of the lower power output in China is attributed to the differences (Δ) in G, CFest., Q, and (1-Cr) respectively. The reduction in output represented by these influences is offset by the positive contribution from the higher value for the installed capacity (C) in China. Quality of Wind Resources for Existing Wind Farms Total wind resources over the contiguous US are notably superior to those in China8,9. Assuming that GE 2.5 MW turbines were deployed in both countries, we find a mean value 6 for CF in the U.S of 0.286, higher than the value of 0.224 for China.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wind Power Suitability in Worcester, M Assachusetts
    Project Number: IQP JRK-WND1 Wind Power Suitability in Worcester, M assachusetts An Interactive Qualifying Project Report: submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by ______________________________ Christopher Kalisz chkalisz@ wpi.edu ______________________________ Calixte M onast cmonast@ wpi.edu ______________________________ M ichael Santoro santron@ wpi.edu ______________________________ Benjamin Trow btrow@ wpi.edu Date: March 14, 2005 Faculty Advisors: _________________________ Professor Scott Jiusto _________________________ Professor Robert Krueger ABSTRACT The goal of this project was to identify criteria needed to determine the suitability of potential wind turbine sites in Worcester, Massachusetts. The report first discusses physical, environmental, economic, and social factors that affect the suitability of potential wind power sites. We then completed a case study for a site in downtown Worcester, directly applying the criteria. Our hope is the project will raise local awareness of renewable energy and illustrate the practicality of a clean energy project. - 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................ 2 TABLE OF FIGURES...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Countermeasures of China's Green Electric Power
    sustainability Review Analysis and Countermeasures of China’s Green Electric Power Development Keke Wang 1,2, Dongxiao Niu 1,2, Min Yu 1,2, Yi Liang 3,4,* , Xiaolong Yang 1,2, Jing Wu 1 and Xiaomin Xu 1,2 1 School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China; [email protected] (K.W.); [email protected] (D.N.); [email protected] (M.Y.); [email protected] (X.Y.); [email protected] (J.W.); [email protected] (X.X.) 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy Power and Low-Carbon Development, School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China 3 School of Management, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China 4 Strategy and Management Base of Mineral Resources in Hebei Province, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The green development of electric power is a key measure to alleviate the shortage of energy supply, adjust the energy structure, reduce environmental pollution and improve energy efficiency. Firstly, the situation and challenges of China’s power green development is analyzed. On this basis, the power green development models are categorized into two typical research objects, which are multi-energy synergy mode, represented by integrated energy systems, and multi-energy combination mode with clean energy participation. The key points of the green power development model with the consumption of new energy as the core are reviewed, and then China’s exploration of the power green development system and the latest research results are reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Wind Energy
    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Financial Report, Second Quarter 2021
    Company announcement No. 16/2021 Interim Financial Report Second Quarter 2021 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Hedeager 42,8200 Aarhus N, Denmark Company Reg. No.: 10403782 Wind. It means the world to us.TM Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Financial and operational key figures ......................................................................................... 4 Sustainability key figures ............................................................................................................. 5 Group financial performance ....................................................................................................... 6 Power Solutions ............................................................................................................................ 9 Service ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................... 13 Strategy and financial and capital structure targets ................................................................ 14 Outlook 2021 ................................................................................................................................ 17 Consolidated financial statements 1 January - 30 June .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Market Report
    US OFFSHORE WIND MARKET UPDATE & INSIGHTS US OFFSHORE WIND CAPACITY GENERATION The US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (BOEM), has auctioned 16 US offshore wind energy areas (WEAs) designated in federal waters for offshore wind development. Each area has been leased to a qualified offshore wind developer. The ar- eas are located along the East Coast from North Carolina to Massachusetts and represent a total potential capacity of 21,000 Megawatts (MWs) of offshore wind power generation. HISTORY OF BOEM AUCTIONS AND LEASES YEAR LEASE # LESSEE STATE ACREAGE BID MW* NEXT 2012 0482 GSOE I DE 70,098 NA NA SAP *Reading volumes, some earlier estimates 2013 0486 Deepwater Wind NE RI/MA 97,498 $3,838,288 3400 TTL COP of capacity likely used 2013 0487 Deepwater Wind NE RI/MA 67,252 $3,838,288 3400 TTL FDR different calculations. 2013 0483 VA Electric & Power Co. VA 112,799 $1,600,000 2000 COP In all cases, capacity 2014 0490 US Wind MD 79,707 $8,701,098 1450 COP calculations should be considered estimates. 2015 0501 Vineyard Wind MA 166,886 $166,886 See Below FDR 2015 0500 Bay State Wind MA 187,523 $281,285 2000 TTL COP 2016 0498 Ocean Wind NJ 160,480 $880,715 See Below COP 2016 0499 EDFR Development NJ 183,353 $1,006,240 3400 TTL SAP 2017 0512 Equinor Wind US NY 79,350 $42,469,725 1000 COP 2017 0508 Avangrid Renewables NC 122,405 $9,066,650 1486 SAP 2018 0519 Skipjack Offshore Energy DE 26,332 Assigned NA SAP 2018 0520 Equinor Wind US MA 128,811 $135,000,000 1300 EXEC 2018 0521 Mayflower Wind Energy MA 127,388 $135,000,000 1300 EXEC 2018 0522 Vineyard Wind MA 132,370 $135,000,000 1500 EXEC EXEC—Lease Execution SAP—Site Assessment Plan COP—Construction & Operations Plan FDR—Facility Design Report @offshorewindus / BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND / offshorewindus.org 1 STATE 2018 2019 MARKET GROWTH The US Offshore Wind market currently stands VIRGINIA 12 12 at 16,970 MWs and is a subset of the total US MARYLAND 366 366 potential generation capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy the Competitive Choice
    IN FOCUS Canada Offshore WIND ENERGY THE COMPETITIVE CHOICE PROFILE Hydrogenics SEPTEMBER 2019 windsystemsmag.com The Leader in the field of Friction and Drag Reduction DSX Extra • Reduces wear while delivering faster reaction, cooler running and more power. • Provides shielded protection against wear, corrosion, carbonization and oxidation. DSX Defender II • Supports universal viscosity with all synthetic and • Repels debris, salt, mildew, tar conventional petroleum oils and and insects greases. • Provides ultraviolet screen • Embeds permanently in the metal surface asperities without Long-lasting protection • changing tolerances of bearings, DSX Defender II provides rings or pistons. a measurable reduction in • Contains no hazardous aerodynamic and hydrodynamic hydrocarbons or drag. chlorofluorocarbons (cfc’s). • Environmentally safe to DSX Defender III handle, ship, store and Includes a higher level of dispose of. fluoropolymers for greater protection and longer life. Recommended for the leading DSX Products are based on embedded particle edge of turbine blades and other technology. All DSX Products modify friction. critical areas. Basically, the fluoropolymer particles fill the voids in the surface of the materials creating a better fit and finish. +1-904-744-3400 www.dsxproducts.com CONTENTS 12 PROFILE IN FOCUS Hydrogenics, a leading producer of water electrolyzers and hydrogen fuel cells, has taken its innovative technology to the WIND ENERGY: next level. 22 THE COMPETITIVE CHOICE Affordable, flexible, and clean, wind energy is key to a modernized grid in Canada. OFFSHORE WIND’S WESTWARD EXPANSION As offshore wind eyes the West Coast, project sponsors will need to carefully consider issues that will develop. 16 OFFSHORE WIND IS READY FOR ITS AMERICAN MOMENT CONVERSATION The offshore oil and gas supply chain stands Laura Smith Morton, AWEA’s senior director, Policy & Regulatory Affairs, to benefit in a big way from the coming Offshore Wind, says the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Wind Power in China and Policy Implications
    Energies 2015, 8, 1529-1546; doi:10.3390/en8021529 OPEN ACCESS energies ISSN 1996-1073 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Article The Economics of Wind Power in China and Policy Implications Zifa Liu 1, Wenhua Zhang 2,†, Changhong Zhao 2,† and Jiahai Yuan 2,* 1 School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Chang Ping District, Beijing 102206, China; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Chang Ping District, Beijing 102206, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (W.Z.); [email protected] (C.Z.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel./Fax: +86-10-6177-3091. Academic Editor: Erik Gawel Received: 6 December 2014 / Accepted: 4 February 2015 / Published: 17 February 2015 Abstract: In 2009, the implementation of feed-in tariff (FIT) and attractive public subsidies for onshore wind farms aroused great investment enthusiasm and spurred remarkable development of wind power in China. Meanwhile, rapid learning-by-doing has significantly cut down the cost of wind turbines and the capital cost of wind farms as well. Therefore, it is the right time to examine the appropriateness of the existing FIT policy for wind power in China. In this paper, we employ the analytical framework for levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) to model the generation cost of wind power. Results show that the existing FIT policy is attractive to investors, but serious curtailment and turbine quality issues could make wind power unprofitable. Meanwhile, rapid substantial decreases in the cost of wind power have made it competitive to coal power in 2013, implying that it is possible and necessary to reform the FIT policy for new wind farms.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwec-2006 Final 01.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword. 1 Introduction: Booming wind markets put temporary strain on supply chains. 2 Global summary: The Status of the Global Wind Energy Markets . 7 Market forecast for 2007-2010. 12 COUNTRY REPORTS Europe . .16 European Union . 16 Germany. 20 Italy . 22 Poland. 24 Spain . 26 United Kingdom . 28 Americas . .30 United States . 30 Canada. 32 Brazil . 34 Mexico . 36 Asia . .38 India. 38 China. 40 Japan . 42 Korea. 44 Pacifi c. .46 Australia . 46 Africa. .48 Egypt. 48 Iran. 50 Morroco. 52 Conclusions: The need for solid political frameworks. 54 About GWEC . 56 Foreword 2006 was another booming year for the wind industry, The Global Wind Report 2006 is the second annual report with growth in annual installed capacity of 32 % globally, by GWEC on the status of global wind energy markets, and well ahead of our own projections. The market continued it clearly shows that wind energy today is a global business, to broaden, further establishing wind power as the leading with installations in over 70 countries. renewable energy technology – in the vanguard of the 21st century energy industry transformation. Globally, the value While Europe continues to lead the way, with 65 % of the of new generating plant installed in 2006 reached global market, the United States was the leader in new €18 billion, or US$24 billion. installed capacity for the second year running, bringing about 2,500 MW capacity of new plant on line in 2006. Against the backdrop of a growing acknowledgement of the twin crises of global climate change and energy security, The Asian market is also growing at a breathtaking rate, by wind power is the most effective means available now to 53 % in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • GWEC – Global Wind Report | Annual Market Update 2014
    GLOBAL WIND REPORT ANNUAL MARKET UPDATE 2014 Navigating the global wind power market The Global Wind Energy Council is the international trade association for the wind power industry – communicating the benefits of wind power to national governments, policy makers and international institutions. GWEC provides authoritative research and analysis on the wind power industry in more than 80 countries around the world. Keep up to date with the most recent market insights: Global Wind Statistics 2014 February 2015 Global Wind Report 2014 March 2015 Global Wind Energy Outlook 2014 October 2014 Offshore Wind Policy and Market Assessment – A Global Outlook February 2015 Our mission is to ensure that wind power establishes itself as the answer to today‘s energy challenges, providing substantial venvironmental and economic benefits. GWEC represents the industry with or at the UNFCCC, the IEA, international financial institutions, the IPCC and IRENA. GWEC – opening up the frontiers follow us on TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword. 4 Making the Commitment to Renewable Energy. 5 Global Status of Wind Power in 2014 . 6 Market Forecast for 2015 – 2019. 16 Green bonds offer exciting opportunities for the wind sector . .22 Emerging Africa . .26 Australia . .30 Brazil . 32 Canada. .34 Chile . .36 PR China . .38 Denmark . .42 The European Union . .44 France . .46 Germany. .48 Global offshore . 52 India . .58 Italy . .60 Japan . .62 Mexico . .64 Poland . .66 South Africa . .68 Sweden . 70 Turkey . 72 United Kingdom. 74 United States . 76 About GWEC . 78 GWEC – Global Wind 2014 Report 3 FOREWORD 014 was a great year for the wind industry, setting a The two big stories in 2014 and going forward continue 2new record of more than 51 GW installed in a single to be the precipitous drop in the price of oil, and growing year, bringing the global total close to 370 GW.
    [Show full text]
  • Decarbonizing China's Power System with Wind Power
    January 2015 Decarbonizing China’s power system with wind power: the past and the future OIES PAPER: EL 11 Xin Li The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2015 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-019-1 i Abstract Wind power in China has experienced significant growth since the beginning of this century. Total installed capacity has increased almost 300 fold – from 346 MW in 2000 to 91,413 MW in 2013. This rapid development has had two major drivers: • First, the excellent wind power resource in China, especially in the north of the country, and the increasing competitiveness of wind generation worldwide. • Second, favourable government policies such as: mandatory targets for major power generators in relation to renewable energy; the decentralization of plant approval rights; and feed-in tariffs for wind generation. Along with the development of domestic wind turbine manufacturing capacity, these factors have stimulated the growth of wind power over the past 10 years or so. However, this rapid development has itself created new challenges. In particular, wind power has not been fully integrated into the electricity system as a whole, as the growth of wind generation capacity has not been matched by a corresponding growth in transmission capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Usa Wind Energy Resources
    USA WIND ENERGY RESOURCES © M. Ragheb 2/7/2021 “An acre of windy prairie could produce between $4,000 and $10,000 worth of electricity per year.” Dennis Hayes INTRODUCTION Wind power accounted for 6 percent of the USA’s total electricity generation capacity, compared with 19 percent for Nuclear Power generation. A record 13.2 GWs of rated wind capacity were installed in 2012 including 5.5 GWs in December 2012, the most ever for a single month. The total rated wind capacity stands at about 60 GWs. Utilities are buying wind power because they want to, not because they have to, to benefit from the Production Tax Credit PTC incentive. The credit has been extended for a year to cover wind farms that start construction in 2013. Previously it only covered projects that started working by the expiration date. Asset financing for USA wind farms was $4.3 billion in the second-half compared with $9.6 billion in the first six months of 2012. Component makers are the General Electric Company (GE), Siemens AG, Vestas AS, Gamesa Corp Tecnologica SA and Clipper Windpower Ltd., which is owned by Platinum Equity LLC. Equipment prices for wind have dropped by more than 21 percent since 2010, and the performance of turbines has risen. This has resulted in a 21 percent decrease in the overall cost of electricity from wind for a typical USA project since 2010. From 2006 to 2012 USA domestic manufacturing facilities for wind turbine components has grown 12 times to more than 400 facilities in 43 states.
    [Show full text]