A2048-AGES Skeptical
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Arecibo Galactic Environments Survey (AGES) http://www.naic.edu/~ages/ Report to the skeptical review panel August 1st 2008 Introduction The Arecibo Galactic Environments Survey (AGES) is a proposal to use the Arecibo telescope with its multi-beam instrument ALFA to survey nearby galactic environments and the volumes behind them. The intention of the survey is to reach lower noise levels than ALFALFA and therefore to search for lower mass and lower column density HI objects. We drift scan across the sky with a goal of completing 25 scans across each point, equivalent to a 300s integration. For direct comparison with the ALFALFA survey we have smoothed our data to their spatial and velocity resolution and this gives typically a rms noise level of 0.75 mJy for AGES, compared to the ALFALFA published value of 2.2 mJy. ALFALFA, although covering a larger area is no deeper than previous ‘blind’ Arecibo extra-galactic surveys, while AGES pushes beyond the sensitivity of the previous deepest blind HI surveys. The proposed total sky coverage is 200 sq deg. The original proposal was for 2000 hours with targets spread across the RA range. The proposal was submitted in February 2005 but the start was delayed until late December 2005. It is important to recognize that the E-ALFA collaboration agreed at their meetings that a coordinated strategy was needed to explore the extragalactic Universe at 21cm. That strategy called for three different survey depths, following the classic ‘wedding cake’ design. ALFALFA is the large area shallow survey that will improve on the small number statistics of previous surveys. AGES is the middle level sensitivity survey, which will explore new parameter space at greater sensitivity than previous surveys, but will cover less area. Finally, AUDS will explore much greater depths over a very small area. To date AGES has been allocated about 500 hours of observing time in total; about one quarter of that originally requested. In the period covered by this review, 1st August 2007 to 1st August 2008, AGES was scheduled for 226 hours of telescope time most of which has been quite recent (since January) due to telescope painting. We request a minimum of 500 hours over the next year so that the survey can be completed over a reasonable period of time (hopefully within the next 3 years). Technical issues We now routinely observe remotely from Cardiff, Socorro, Green Bank and University of Massachusetts. We have spent a considerable amount of time developing our data reduction pipeline, assessing data quality (Fig 1), testing source detection methods and quantifying completeness and reliability. During the precursor run (described in a previous report) we showed that we could successfully reduce noise levels by the expected factor of t1/2 by keeping the array at fixed azimuth and elevation while the sky drifts overhead. In order to account for the change in parallactic angle, and thus achieve uniform sky coverage, ALFA is rotated before every scan - all of this is now fully automated in software and is very easy for the observer to use (see http://www.naic.edu/~ages/a2048/AGES_guide.html). In order to attain fully sampled sky coverage each scan is staggered by half the beam separation. With this observing set up every beam covers the same patch of sky averaging out gain variations between beams and reducing the impact of side-lobe contamination. We have adapted the HIPASS software (LIVEDATA and GRIDZILLA) so that it operates on the Arecibo CIMAFITS file format. LIVEDATA performs bandpass estimation (using various user specified algorithms) and removal, Doppler tracking and calibrates and smooths (if required) the residual spectrum. GRIDZILLA is a gridding package that co-adds all the spectra letting the user have full control over beam selection, polarizations, frequency range and image and pixel size. For the AGES datacubes we chose 1 arc min pixels and 5 km/s channels and ALL of the reduced data cubes are publicly available in this format at http://www.naic.edu/~ages/public_data.html. We are currently experimenting with other ways of fitting the bandpass and combining scans to try and extract more extended features (Minchin et al., 2008, Taylor et al. 2008 – NGC7332 and Virgo cluster data) , in the future we intend to make available cubes reduced in different, but well documented ways. Analysis of continuum sources in the NGC 7332 data (Minchin et al. 2007) has shown that the post-processing AGES beam is very close to circular with sidelobes at around the 5% level in the expected position. Deconvolving the beam will be necessary for science objective 8 (below) – investigating the low column-density extent of large galaxies. However this is not necessary for the other objectives of AGES and, with only two large galaxies in the currently completed datasets (NGC 1156 and NGC 7339), the scientific return does not currently justify devoting a large amount of team-members time to this problem at the moment. 1 Fig. 1 Comparison (A1367 field) of the HI fluxes (left) and velocity widths (right) measured by AGES, L- wide and past literature. Filled circles indicate the 22 sources confirmed during L-wide follow-up observations, empty circles show the 18 galaxies already known from the literature. The dotted lines indicate the one to one correlation. One of the challenges facing the extragalactic HI surveys is developing a method for detecting galaxies that is both well defined and complete. To achieve this goal we have been experimenting with different detection methods. Currently we search each data cube by eye (independently by two people) and also use two automated finders (POLYFIND) developed by Davies and Minchin and DUCHAMP developed by Matthew Whiting in Australia. We have also obtained follow up observations of low signal to noise detections to check on the reliability of our methods. In Fig. 2, as an example, we show the peak signal to noise of sources plotted against their W20 velocity width. In Auld (2007) we show that this is the best plane to carry out the selection cut (dashed line Fig. 2) giving us 75% reliability to 4σ. Fig 2: Reliability selection criteria for 265 detections from the NGC 1156, Abell 1367 and NGC 628 regions. Black represents detections that have either been followed up or strong signals confirmed by 3 independent methods. Red represents sources that were not confirmed by follow up observations. Stars represent sources that were detected by all three methods, circles by two methods and triangles by one method. Marked on the plot are reliability contours empirically derived from the data. 2 Current status The originally proposed survey fields are shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 3. The originally proposed survey fields are marked in blue. Those that have been completed have been circled in red. Current field status is: Field Status NGC7332 5 sq deg requested and completed Virgo2 5 sq deg requested and completed A1367 20 sq deg requested 5 sq deg completed NGC1156 5 sq deg requested and completed NGC628 Precursor field completed Voids Not started NGC7448 20 sq deg requested 5 sq deg completed Virgo1 20 sq deg requested 5 sq deg completed and 5 sq deg to two thirds depth Leo1 Not started NGC3193 20 sq deg requested, one complete scan completed NGC2577 Not started M33 Not started UGC2082 Not started Our total observed area to full depth amounts to 30 sq deg or just 15% of the total area request in the original proposal and only 10 sq deg more than at this time last year.1 Survey Science The scientific goals of the survey as given in the original proposal are listed below: 1. The HI mass function in different environments - around large galaxies, in groups, clusters and beyond the Local Supercluster - comparison with galaxy evolution models. 2. Given the excellent correlation between star-formation-rate and 20cm continuum emission, we will use the continuum emission to measure the star formation rates of a large number of galaxies selected by their gaseous rather than their optical or far infrared properties. 3. The contribution of neutral gas to the baryonic mass density - the 'missing' baryonic matter problem. 4. The nature of and possible link between HVCs and dwarf galaxies - a possible solution of the CDM sub-structure problem ? 5. The identification of gaseous tidal features as signatures of galaxy interactions and mergers - the importance of mergers as a mechanism for the assembly of galaxies, gas removal mechanisms in clusters and groups. 6. The velocity dispersions of galaxies in groups and clusters - dark matter. 7. The dynamical masses of galaxies - galaxy rotation curves - dark matter. 8. The low-column-density extent of large galaxies - ionisation by the metagalactic radiation field. 9. The identification of isolated neutral gas clouds - remnants or precursors of the galaxy formation process ? 10. A comparison of the atomic hydrogen detected by QSO-absorption-line and 21cm observations - consistency between different observations that measure the same thing. 11. The spatial distribution of HI selected galaxies. 12. A comparison with numerical models of galaxy formation - providing input and tests of the simulations. 1 Note both Virgo1 and NGC193 have incomplete scan data. 3 13. Serendipitous findings - with a survey like this, covering large areas to low mass-limits and column-densities, we might hope to make new and unexpected discoveries. In the rest of this section we will discuss science results not yet published. These are somewhat limited compared to last year as by far the majority of the observations have been obtained since January (due to telescope painting), a number of scans are incomplete and the Virgo fields are part of Rhys Taylor’s PHD project.