DOCSLIB.ORG

Legacy- December 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legacy- December 2018 University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina SCIAA Newsletter - Legacy & PastWatch Institute of 12-2018 Legacy- December 2018 South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/leg Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Inside... DIRECTOR’S NOTE Susan Davis New Business Manager New Sergeant York Battlefield Archaeology Book Please Welcome Stacey Young––Applied Research Division VOL. 22, NO. 2, DECEMBER 2018 RESEARCH Broad River Trenching Project APPLIED RESEARCH Deer, Turtles, and Eagles and More: Animals Used at Spanish Mount MARITIME RESEARCH Submerged: Hands-On Interaction with 8th Graders RECENT SCIAA PUBLICATIONS Archaeology in South Carolina: Exploring the Hidden Heritage of the A Tribute to Elizabeth “Betty” Palmetto State Early Human Life on the Southeastern Hamilton Stringfellow (November 14, Coastal Plain and Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tools of South 1921-May 18, 2017) Carolina By Tommy Charles, Albert Goodyear, George Bell, Laura Stringfellow Wilson, and Nena Powell Rice ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH In July 2018, The University of South Stringfellow. This gift is truly appreciated, TRUST (ART) and the research staff at the SCIAA SCIAA Donors Carolina Educational Foundation Archaeological Research Trust (ART) are indebted to the family of Elizabeth EVENTS Endowment at the SC Institute of Stringfellow, fondly known as “Betty,” for 6th Annual Arkhaios Cultural Heritage and Archaeology and Anthropology (SCIAA) years to come. This is a legacy that stems Archaeology Film Festival––Columbia–– received a generous gift of $145,000 from from many years of true friendship–– October 12-14, 2018 the Estate of Mrs. Elizabeth Hamilton giving and receiving! ENDOWMENT OPPORTUNITIES Stanley South Student Archaeological Research Endowment Fund Thank you for your generous support of the Archaeological Research Trust (ART) Endowment Fund and the printing of Legacy. Please send donations in the enclosed envelope to Nena Powell Rice USC/SCIAA, 1321 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29208, indicating whether you want to continue receiving Legacy and include your email address. All contributions are appreciated. Please visit our website at: http://www. artsandsciences.sc.edu/sciaa to download past issues, and let the Editor know if you wish to receive Legacy by email. Thank You! Nena Powell Rice, Editor, Figure 1: A Tribute to Mrs. Elizabeth “Betty” Hamilton Stringfellow. (Photo by Laura Stringfellow Wilson) (803) 331-3431 Cell, ([email protected]). See STRINGFELLOW, Page 4 Legacy is the magazine of the SC Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, College of Arts and By Steve Smith Sciences, University of South Carolina SCIAA Director Legacy will be published twice in 2018 Director’s Notes Nena Powell Rice, Chief Editor, Layout, Design, and Production ([email protected]) This issue of Legacy is highlighted by a I am very pleased to announce that the tribute to a great friend of the Institute, real director of the Institute, Susan “Radar Editorial Board Betty Stringfellow. Betty touched all our O’Reilly” Davis, has been promoted from Chester B. DePratter, Research Keith Stephenson, Savannah River Archaeological lives and her legacy gift will continue to Administrative Assistant to the Institute’s Research Program support SCIAA research in the years to Business Manager. Over the past several Jonathan Leader, State Archaeologist come. years, Susan has managed to survive the Nena Powell Rice, Archaeological Research Trust We welcome two new members to the online transformation of the universities Steven D. Smith, Director family. First, Stacey Young has joined us as financial system, kept her cool when it James Spirek, State Underwater the new Director of the Applied Research doesn’t work, maneuvered through the Archaeologist Division. Stacey comes from a solid ever-changing rules, regulations, polices, Archaeological Research Trust background in hardcore Cultural Resource procedures, and at the same time kept her Board of Trustees Management (CRM), and as a result, was sanity, and mine. For her reward, we have Bill Bridges, Chair, Greenville, SC immediately parachuted into our applied given her more responsibility and stress, George Bell, Vice Chair, Greenville, SC Kenneth Huggins, Past Chair, Mt. Pleasant, SC program and is doing spectacularly. In of course. Nena Powell Rice, Secretary, Columbia, SC her short time here, she has wrapped up Enjoy another issue of Legacy, and Steven D. Smith, Director, Ex-Officio, several outstanding projects and is starting if you have any questions or comments Columbia, SC Jonathan Leader, State Archaeologist, Ex-Officio, new ones, which you will hear about in about SCIAA or Legacy, please feel free Columbia, SC future issues. of Legacy. (See Page 3 for a to email Susan Davis at davis8@mailbox. F. Jo Baker, Pawleys Island, SC brief biography on Stacey Young.) sc.edu, or call (803) 576-6570. William A. Behan, Bluffton, SC Hunter Bridges, Greenville, SC Chester DePratter, Columbia SC Antony C. Harper, Greenville, SC Ernest L. “Chip” Helms, III, MD, Society Hill, SC Sam McCuen, Lexington, SC Ira Miller, Columbia, SC Bob Mimms, Pawleys Island, SC Patricia Moore-Pastides, Columbia, SC Bill Sullivan, Callawassie Island, SC Walter Wilkinson, Pawleys Island, SC Benjamin T. Zeigler, Florence, SC Emeritis Board Lezlie Barker, Greenville, SC Robert Benedict, Greenville, SC B. Lindsay Crawford, Columbia, SC Lou Edens, Mt. Pleasant, SC David G. Hodges, Columbia, SC Dorothy Kendall, MD, Eastover, SC Edward Kendall, MD, Eastover, SC Figure 1: Susan “Radar O’Reilly” Davis, “Making Sure We All Get Paid!” (Photo by Steven Smith) Francis Neuffer, MD, Columbia, SC Heyward Robinson, Mt. Pleasant, SC Administrative Staff to ART Board Sergeant York Battlefield Archaeology Nena Powell Rice (803) 331-3431 Cell or ([email protected]) Study Published By James Legg University of South Carolina Long-time readers may recall that in 2009, by Frontline / Pen and Sword Books, a SC Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology I was privileged to participate in the final major British publisher of military history. 1321 Pendleton Street and most intensive archaeological field First author Michael Kelly was an active Columbia, SC 29208 season of the Sergeant York Project, in the participant in the York research from the (803) 777-8170 (For Staff Directory) (803) 331-3431 Cell (Nena Rice) Argonne Forest in northern France (see beginning. Co-author Tom Nolan was the (803) 254-1338, FAX Legacy, Vol. 14, No. 1, February 2010). Our originator and principal investigator of the http://www.artsandsciences.sc.edu/sciaa York project is the subject of a new book project, while co-author Brad Posey was Hero on the Western Front: Discovering heavily involved in the final field season, Alvin York’s WWI Batttlefield, published the analysis, and much of the supporting See YORK, Page 3 2 Legacy, Vol. 22, No. 2, December 2018 Please Welcome Stacey Young, New Director of the Applied Research Division at SCIAA By Stacey Young Since joining SCIAA as the new Director My research interests include the of the Applied Research Division (ARD) organization and development of in September 2018, I have been immersed communities, 18th and 19th century in the archaeology and history of the plantations, African American archaeology, Sandhills regions of South Carolina and public and community involvement North Carolina. Over the past year, we in archaeology, and museum studies have had crews in the field surveying and collection management. Although, about 3,000 acres at Fort Bragg Military I find that I am generally interested in Installation. The survey work is wrapping understanding the everyday life and up, and we expect to start a testing project cultural landscape pertaining to whatever of 14 sites in January. During this time, we the material culture is. Over the past eight have also continued work at Fort Jackson years, “in my free time,” I have pursued and McCrady Training Center. some of my own research interest working Prior to my arrival at SCIAA, I worked at Hampton Plantation State Historic Site. as a Field Director for TRC and New South With the support and encouragement of Associates, archaeological consulting David Jones (SC State Parks Archaeologist) firms based in Columbia, SC, spending and Al Hester (SC State Parks Historian), time on various projects across the the assistance of dozens of students Southeastern United States and beyond. I and volunteers, and grants from the received my M.A. from the University of Humanities Council of South Carolina Southern Mississippi (2004) and my B.A. and the South Carolina State Historic from the University of Memphis (2000). Preservation Office, we have completed Prior to joining the realm of Cultural archaeological survey of the entire 294- Resource Management CRM, I worked acre property, identified evidence of the at the National Civil Rights Museum in former enslaved communities and tenant Memphis and the DeSoto National Forest farmers or sharecroppers, and an early 18th in Mississippi. I came to South Carolina in century settlement that pre-dates Hampton 2006 and became involved with various Plantation, and have engaged members organizations and volunteer opportunities of the surrounding communities in the and have served on many board positions work. The results of this work are assisting for the Archaeological Society of South the park staff in interpreting the larger Carolina
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Strong Was Strong Mountain? Preliminary Remarks on the Possible Location of the Mamluk Siege Position at Montfort Castle
    CHAPTER 26 How Strong was Strong Mountain? Preliminary Remarks on the Possible Location of the Mamluk Siege Position at Montfort Castle Rafael Lewis During a topographic and landscape archaeology sur- logical site to the broader landscape, including every vey, thoughts on Montfort Castle’s topographical infe- archaeological feature in it. The field methods used riority led to some preliminary1 ideas on the manner in Landscape Archaeology and the Archaeology of in which the Teutonic Order dealt with this crucial Conflicts includes the equal examination of all man- weakness, and what would have been the best loca- made features, not excluding modern elements which tion for the Mamluks to position their siege machinery are documented and studied. The underlying concept and camps during the two assaults of the castle in May of this approach is that in order to understand the 1266 and June 1271.2 meaning of a single find or feature, we need to under- Montfort Castle is isolated from main roads, com- stand the environment in which they were found and mercial centres and major settlements. The problem how they relate to it. The manner in which objects of its isolated location has been raised in the past.3 In are scattered in the landscape is examined strati- order to better understand the castle in its setting, I graphically, but also according to their focal, discrete or decided to go beyond the well-secured boundaries of expanded nature. A path, for example, can usually be the castle’s walls, to raise my head (methodologically) described as a discrete or expanded feature, but a road from the trenches, bulks and archaeological artefacts, junction where a few such features meet, is usually of and look at this specific topic of inquiry from a wide a focal nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside... DIRECTOR’S NOTE VOL
    Inside... DIRECTOR’S NOTE VOL. 24, NO. 2, DECEMBER 2020 Battlefield Archaeology Book––Francis Marion and the Snow’s Island Community RESEARCH Small Arms Evidence from Star Fort Numismatic History of Charlesfort/Santa Elena: Plantation Era New Mound at Mulberry Archaeology in South Carolina Book MARITIME RESEARCH MRD Features in National Geographic TV Channel Drain the Oceans Season 3 A Mystery Object from Mississippi SAVANNAH RIVER By Chester B. DePratter, Director of Research ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH In 1976, I first became interested in colleagues, Charles Hudson and Marvin PROGRAM Hernando de Soto and the expedition he Smith, and I have published papers on Public Outreach in Time of Covid led through the Southeast when I was the 1539-1543 route that Soto and his men SCIAA ANNUAL REPORT just beginning work on my Ph.D. at the took from their landing in Tampa Bay, A New Feature in Legacy University of Georgia. In the 44 years that Florida, to the departure of the expedition have passed since then, my friends and survivors down the Mississippi River HISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGY A New Feature in Legacy MYSTERY ARTIFACT, See Page 4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH TRUST (ART) AND SCIAA DONORS ENDOWMENT OPPORTUNITIES Stanley South Student Archaeological Research Endowment Fund Thank you for your generous support of the Archaeological Research Trust (ART) Endowment Fund and the printing of Legacy. Please send donations in the enclosed envelope to Nena Powell Rice USC/SCIAA, 1321 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29208, indicating whether you want to continue receiving Legacy and include your email address. All contributions are appreciated. Please visit our website at: http://www.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Archaeology
    INDIANA ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 6 Number 1 2011 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Indiana Department of Natural Resources Robert E. Carter, Jr., Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) James A. Glass, Ph.D., Director and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DHPA Archaeology Staff James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson, Senior Archaeologist and Archaeology Outreach Coordinator Cathy L. Draeger-Williams, Archaeologist Wade T. Tharp, Archaeologist Rachel A. Sharkey, Records Check Coordinator Editors James R. Jones III, Ph.D. Amy L. Johnson Cathy A. Carson Editorial Assistance: Cathy Draeger-Williams Publication Layout: Amy L. Johnson Additional acknowledgments: The editors wish to thank the authors of the submitted articles, as well as all of those who participated in, and contributed to, the archaeological projects which are highlighted. The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service is gratefully acknow- ledged for their support of Indiana archaeological research as well as this volume. Cover design: The images which are featured on the cover are from several of the individual articles included in this journal. This publication has been funded in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service‘s Historic Preservation Fund administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. In addition, the projects discussed in several of the articles received federal financial assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund Program for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the State of Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Salary Survey 2013
    2012/2013 Entry-level Salary Information for Recent Graduates in Agriculture and Related Disciplines Each year, participating agricultural colleges across the nation provide data to summarize entry-level salaries of recent graduates of their programs. The information is useful to help illustrate industry trends and provide appropriate baselines for both students and employers. The summary, which is coordinated by Iowa State University, includes information collected by career services offi ces from December 2012 and May 2013 undergraduates. After the data are tabulated, the summary is fi nalized in August of each year and disseminated to contributing schools for appropriate use. This year, the participating universities were: Auburn University - College of Agriculture Clemson University – College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Life Sciences Colorado State University – Warner College of Natural Resources and College of Agricultural Sciences Iowa State University – College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Michigan State University – College of Agriculture and Natural Resources The Ohio State University – College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Oklahoma State University – College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Purdue University – College of Agriculture Texas A&M University – College of Agriculture and Life Sciences University of Georgia – College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois – College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences University of Kentucky – College of
    [Show full text]
  • Battlefield Archaeology: a Guide to the Archaeology of Conflict
    BATTLEFIELD ARCHAEOLOGY: A GUIDE TO THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF CONFLICT Guide 8 BAJR Practical Guide Series Prepared By Tim Sutherland Department of Archaeological Sciences University of Bradford With Contributions On Human Remains By Malin Holst York Osteoarchaeology Ltd © held by authors TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements v 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 WHAT IS BATTLEFIELD ARCHAEOLOGY? 1 3.0 WHY IS THE ANALYSIS OF SITES OF CONFLICT IMPORTANT? 3 3.1 THE USE OF CONFLICTS FOR PROPAGANDA AND MISINFORMATION 4 3.2 BATTLEFIELDS AS MEMORIALS 5 3.3 BATTLEFIELD TOURISM 7 3.4 RE-ENACTMENT 8 3.5 FOCI FOR SOCIAL ACTIVITIES 8 3.6 VIEWS OF THE NATIONAL BODIES 9 3.6.1 The Battlefield Trust 9 3.6.2 English Heritage 9 3.7 BATTLEFIELDS AND THE MEDIA 10 4.0 A BRIEF BATTLEFIELD HISTORY 11 4.1 INTRODUCTION 11 4.2 CASE STUDIES 13 4.2.1 Pre-Twentieth Century Archaeological Investigations 13 5.0 WHY MIGHT A SITE OF CONFLICT BE DISTURBED 14 5.1 WHAT LEGISLATION IS THERE IN PLACE TO PROTECT HISTORIC 15 BATTLEFIELDS? 5.1.1 English Legislation 15 5.1.2 Scotland 18 5.1.3 Wales 18 5.1.4 Northern Ireland 18 6.0 IDENTIFICATION OF SITES OF CONFLICT 18 6.1 EVIDENCE FOR CONFLICT 18 6.2 HOW LARGE MIGHT A BATTLEFIELD BE 19 6.3 DIFFERENT TYPES OF BATTLEFIELD SITES 19 7.0 METHODS OF EVALUATION 20 7.1 EARTHWORK SURVEYS 21 7.2 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY 21 7.2.1 Metal Detector Survey 21 7.2.2 Fluxgate Gradiometer or Magnetometer 22 7.2.3 Electrical Earth Resistance Meter 23 7.2.4 Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) 23 7.3 FIELD WALKING 23 7.4 DESK TOP ASSESSMENTS 23 8.0 ARTEFACT IDENTIFICATION
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Archaeological Examination of a Battlefield Landscape: an Example from the American Civil War Battle of Wilson's Wharf, Charles City County, Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2003 An historical archaeological examination of a battlefield landscape: An Example from the American Civil War Battle of Wilson's Wharf, Charles City County, Virginia Jameson Michael Harwood College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Harwood, Jameson Michael, "An historical archaeological examination of a battlefield landscape: An Example from the American Civil War Battle of Wilson's Wharf, Charles City County, Virginia" (2003). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626393. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-bkaa-yg82 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF A BATTLEFIELD LANDSCAPE: An Example From The American Civil War Battle Of Wilson’s Wharf, Charles City County, Virginia A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Jameson Michael Harwood 2003 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Jameson MichaefHarwood Approved, May 2003 t Norman Barka Dennis Blanton MarleyBrown, III DEDICATION To the soldiers who fought and died the Wilson’s Wharf battlefield landscape TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements v List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Abstract ix Introduction 2 Chapter I.
    [Show full text]
  • George Rogers Clark ~ Archaeology of a Frontier Hero
    George Rogers Clark ~ Archaeology of a Frontier Hero As often happens, when we learn about many important figures in American history it becomes apparent that they were multi-talented individuals, and multi-faceted. General George Rogers Clark, that great figure in the history of our state and nation, was just such a man. Well known are his heroic military skills and accomplishments, and how those dramatic accomplishments helped form our nation at a critical point in its early development. We might also be aware of his surveying, diplomatic, and inventing skills. But, perhaps not everyone knows that this man also had interests in archaeology, paleontology, geology, and natural history (Thomas and Conner 1967). Archaeology by, and related to, George Rogers Clark in Indiana can be separated into several locations to highlight. The first of these is Fort Sackville, the British outpost described as one “of several forts built by the French, British or Americans from 1732 to 1813 in this important frontier settlement [Vincennes, Indiana]” (National Park Service 2004). Lt. Col. Clark and his brave men in 1779 captured the fort from the British. In recognition of the importance of this military feat, and its significance in our country’s history, the country erected the impressive Beaux Arts monument which stands today in Vincennes. The monument and grounds are now part of the George Rogers Clark National Historical Park, administered by the National Park Service. Sadly, no professional archaeological investigations appear to have been conducted prior to when the site for the monument was cleared of other existing structures, and the excavation preparations for the monument were conducted in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3 – FOC 2018
    Page 1 of 112 Editors and Authors Page 2 of 112 Table of Contents Battlefield Studies Archaeology of Modern Conflict: The War after the War in Lithuania and Battle of Užpelkiai Forest, 1949 Gediminas Petrauskas, Aistė Petrauskienė, Vykintas Vaitkevičius………………......................................................................4 The Methodology Used to Identify the Battle Site of Fulford Chas Jones………………………………………………………………………..19 The Battle of Alcalá La Vieja. Location and Understanding of a Medieval Battle. Mario Ramírez Galán, Rafael Montalvo Laguna and María Benítez Galán………………………………………………………...26 Initial Discussions on Military Archaeology Zhao Congcang…………………………………………………………………..44 The Battle of Cheriton: The Archaeology of an English Civil War Battlefield Kevin M. Claxton………………………………………………………………...50 American Revolutionary War “Running the Gauntlet: Locating the Battle of Parker’s Ferry, South Carolina” Steven D. Smith, James B. Legg, Brian C. Mabelitini…………………………..64 “In the Morning We Began to Strip and Bury the Dead:” A Context for Burial Practices During the American War for Independence Robert A. Selig &Wade P. Catts………………………………………………...78 Historical Narrative and Cultural Landscape Analysis: Revealing the American War of Independence Battle of Chelsea Creek Victor T. Mastone, Craig J. Brown, Christopher V. Maio.............................................................................................93 Page 3 of 112 Battlefield Studies Archaeology of Modern Conflict: The War after the War in Lithuania and Battle of Užpelkiai Forest, 1949 Gediminas Petrauskas1, Aistė Petrauskienė2, Vykintas Vaitkevičius3 1. National Museum of Lithuania, Department of Archaeology, Arsenalo St. 1, LT-01143 Vilnius, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected] 2. National Museum of Lithuania, Department of Modern History, Arsenalo St. 1, LT-01143 Vilnius, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected] 3. Vilnius University, Faculty of Communication, Saulėtekio Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Summary of an Archaeological Survey of the Callawassie Island Phase 1 Development, Spring Island, Beaufort County, South Carolina
    MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE CALLAWASSIE ISLAND PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT, SPRING ISLAND, BEAUFORT COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 46 © 2001 by Chicora Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or transcribed In any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior permission of Chicora Foundation, Inc. except for brief quotations used in reviews. Full credit must be given to the authors, publisher, and project sponsor. MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE CALLAWASSIE ISLAND PHASE l DEVELOPMENT, SPRING ISLAND, BEAUFORT COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared For: Mr. Glen Mccaskey Chernoff/Silver & Associates P.O. Box 6069 Hilton Head Island, South Carolina 29938 Prepared By1 Michael Trinkley Chicora Research Contribution 46 Chicora Foundation, Inc. P.O. Box 8664 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 June 16, 1990 Introduction This investigation was conducted by Dr. Michael Trinkley of Chicora Foundation, Inc. for Mr. Glen Mccaskey, consultant to the developer of the approximately 850 acre Callawassie Island property (Callawassie Development Corporation). Callawassie Island is bordered to the north by the Chechessee Creek, to the east by a tributary of the Chechessee Creek and the Callawassie Creek, to the south and west by the Colleton River. The island is separated from neighboring Spring Island by the Callawassie Creek, which runs north-south. The Broad River lies to the east of Spring Island (Figure 1). Both Callawassie and Spring islands are currently owned and being developed by the same interest, the Callawassie Development Corporation. The current Phase 1 development on Callawassie Island, which is situated on the eastern shore of the island, will involve a series of nine fairways for the expansion of the existing 18 hole golf course on Callawassie.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology of the Contemporary Past
    Originally published as González‐Ruibal, A. 2014. Contemporary Past, Archaeology of the. In Claire Smith (Ed.): Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, New York: Springer, pp 1683-1694. Archaeology of the contemporary past Alfredo González-Ruibal Introduction The archaeology of the contemporary past is a new and interdisciplinary field of research that intersects with heritage studies, art, ethnography and modern history. This kind of archaeology, as it is practised today, was born in the late 1990s. However, its intellectual roots go further back (Harrison 2011: 144-149). While “archaeology” literally means the study of ancient things, archaeologists have always been concerned with the present, although in very different ways. During the nineteenth century, there was no clear-cut division between present and past, archaeology and anthropology, and prehistory books regularly included living societies (but always non-industrial). This perspective soon fell into disrepute, due to its inherent racism and simplistic evolutionism. From the late 1950s onwards, archaeologists renewed their interest in the contemporary world through a new method—ethnoarchaeology—and a new theory— processualism. As in the previous century, it was traditional groups that were targeted: other societies were not studied. This is because ethnoarchaeology was conducted for the sake of developing analogies to understand the past, not as an end in itself to understand the present. Historical Background Despite their lack of concern for contemporary communities, processual archaeologists, like Lewis Binford, paved the way for an archaeological study of the present. On the one hand, unlike culture-historical archaeologists, processualists were not concerned with particular periods and cultures, but with understanding human behavior and social processes in general—and this could include the present.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Indiana Archaeology Journal Vol. 13. No. 1
    INDIANA ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 13 Number 1 2018 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Indiana Department of Natural Resources Cameron F. Clark, Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) Beth K. McCord, Director and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DHPA Archaeology Staff Amy L. Johnson, State Archaeologist, Archaeology Outreach Coordinator, and Team Leader for Archaeology Cathy L. Draeger-Williams, Archaeologist Rachel A. Sharkey, Archaeologist Wade T. Tharp, Archaeologist Editor: Amy L. Johnson Guest Editor: James R. Jones III, Ph.D. Editorial Assistance: Cathy Draeger-Williams, Wade T. Tharp Additional acknowledgments: The editors wish to thank the authors of the submitted articles and report/feature, as well as all of those who participated in, and contributed to, the archaeological projects which are highlighted. The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service is gratefully acknowledged for their support of Indiana archaeological research as well as this volume. Cover design: The images which are featured on the cover are from the articles included in this journal. This publication has been funded in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service’s Historic Preservation Fund administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. Projects discussed in several of the articles also received federal financial assistance for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the State of Indiana. However, the contents and opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Summary of an Archaeological Survey of the Spring Island Bridge, Spring and Callawassie Islands, Beaufort County, South Carolina
    MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE SPRING ISLAND BRIDGE, SPRING AND CALLAWASSIE ISLANDS, BEAUFORT COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA . RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 37 © 2001 tiy Chicora Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this putilicatlon may tie reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or transcritied in any form or tiy any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otheiwise without prior permission of Chicora Foundation, Inc. except for brief quota~ons used in reviews. Full credit must tie given to the authors, putilisher, and project sponsor. MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE SPRING ISLAND BRIDGE, SPRING AND CALLAWASSIE ISLANDS, BEAUFORT COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared For: Mr. Glen Mccaskey William R. Biggs/Gilmore Associates P.O. Box 6069 Hilton Head Island, South Carolina 29938 Prepared By: Michael Trinkley Chicora Research Contribution 37 Chicora Foundation, Inc. P.O. Box 8664 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 August 15, 1989 Introduction This investigation was conducted by Dr. Michael Trinkley of Chicora Foundation, Inc. for Mr. Glen Mccaskey, consultant to the developer of the Spring Island property (Callawassie Development Corporation). This survey tracts are located on the western shore of Spring Island and the eastern shore of Callawassie Island in Beaufort County. Spring and Callawassie islands are bordered to the north by the Chechessee River and Creek respectively and to the south by the Colleton River. The two islands are separated by the Callawassie Creek, which runs north-south. Callawassie Island is separated from the mainland by Chechessee Creek. The Broad River lies to the east of Spring Island. Both islands are currently owned and being developed by the same interest, the Callawassie Development Corporation.
    [Show full text]