Cornell Law Review Volume 60 Article 7 Issue 6 August 1975 Arbitration of Grievance and Salary Disputes in Professional Baseball Evolution of a System of Private Law Mark L. Goldstein Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mark L. Goldstein, Arbitration of Grievance and Salary Disputes in Professional Baseball Evolution of a System of Private Law, 60 Cornell L. Rev. 1049 (1975) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol60/iss6/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. ARBITRATION OF GRIEVANCE AND SALARY DISPUTES IN PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL: EVOLUTION OF A SYSTEM OF PRIVATE LAW Labor arbitration is a substitute for economic force.' The labor arbitrator is selected by the parties to a collective bargaining 2 agreement to administer their private system of self-government, and his decisions can vitalize the employment relationship. Too many unforeseeable problems exist in such a relationship to make the words of a contract the exclusive source of obligations. 3 As the Supreme Court has recognized, [a]rbitration is the means of solving the unforeseeable by mold- ing a system of private law for all the problems which may arise and to provide for their solution in a way which will generally accord with the variant needs and desires of the parties.