DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission by the Department of the Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submission by the Department of the Environment Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Inquiry into the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standing) Bill 2015 Submission by the Department of the Environment 1. INTRODUCTION The Government introduced the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standing) Bill 2015 into the House of Representatives on 20 August 2015. The Bill would repeal section 487 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the EPBC Act). Section 487 of the EPBC Act extends the range of persons and organisations who may apply for judicial review of EPBC Act approval decisions beyond those who may do so under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (the ADJR Act) and the Judiciary Act 1903. The purpose of the Bill is to bring the arrangements for standing to make a judicial review application under the EPBC Act into line with the standard arrangements for permitting judicial review challenges to Commonwealth administrative decisions as provided for under the ADJR Act and the Judiciary Act.1 2. LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT History of the extended standing provisions under the EPBC Act The extended standing provisions contained in section 487 have been part of the EPBC Act since it was passed in 1999. Section 487 has not been amended since that time. The facilitation of judicial review by the extended standing provisions in the EBPC Act was a fundamental change from the Environment Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act 1974 (the EPIP Act). In introducing the EPIP Act in 1974, the then Minister for the Environment and Conservation, the Hon Dr Moss Cass, said in his second reading speech that the government had decided not to have wide standing provisions. Dr Cass noted difficulties in the United States arising from its environmental impact assessment due to “too frequent a resort to the courts”.2 Section 487 was intended to recognise the general public interest in the protection of matters of national environmental significance under the EPBC Act. This is on the basis that the public interest is separate from a personal interest, such as a property right or business interest, affected by a decision made under the EPBC Act. The Explanatory Memorandum to the 1 See the Minister’s Second Reading Speech on the Bill. Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 20 August 2015, 4 (Mr Hunt). 2 Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 26 November 1974, 4082 (Dr Cass). Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Bill 1998 noted that section 487 extends (and does not limit) the meaning of the term ‘person aggrieved’ in the ADJR Act.3 3. JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE EBPC ACT Standard judicial review arrangements for EPBC Act decisions The EPBC Act provides that the Minister or his or her delegate may make a wide range of administrative decisions concerning matters regulated by the Act. Judicial review, which concerns the legality of the way in which a decision is made by the statutory decision-maker, is available for certain administrative decisions made under the EPBC Act. Ordinarily, applications for judicial review would be made under: section 5 of the ADJR Act (which concerns applications made to the Federal Court); or more rarely, under section 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (which concerns the applications made to the Federal Court as part of its original jurisdiction, for instance, an application to seek an injunction or a declaration against an officer of the Commonwealth). Standing to seek judicial review under the standard arrangements Standing to make an application under section 5 of the ADJR Act is determined by whether someone is a ‘person aggrieved’ by a decision of an administrative character made under an enactment. An aggrieved person includes a person whose interests are adversely affected by the decision. Generally, a person or organisation would need to show a ‘special interest’ that is adversely affected by the relevant decision. Standing to make an application under section 39B of the Judiciary Act is determined by the common law, which provides that the applicant must either have a private right or be able to establish that he or she has a ‘special interest in the subject matter’. ‘Special interest’ would generally require that the applicant show an interest in the subject matter of the action which is beyond that of any other member of the public.4 Merits review of EPBC Act decisions Merits review is only available for limited decisions made under the EPBC Act. It allows the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to consider all aspects of an administrative decision and to affirm, vary or set aside the original decision. In the EPBC Act, merits review is available for permit, certificate and declaration decisions under Part 13 and 13A of the EPBC Act (sections 206A(1), 221A, 243A, 263A, 303JG(1), 473(1)). In some cases, the decisions that are reviewable through merits review may be limited to decisions made by the delegate of the Minister. 3 Explanatory Memorandum, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Bill 1998 (paragraph 653) 4 The meaning of “special interest” under the common law test for determining standing was determined by the High Court in Australian Conservation Foundation v Commonwealth (1980) 146 CLR 493, in which environmental groups sought standing to challenge actions taken under the EPIP Act. 2 Judicial review and section 487 of the EPBC Act Section 487 extends the standing of parties to seek judicial review of decisions made under the EPBC Act beyond that contemplated by section 5 of the ADJR Act. Section 487 does this by extending the meaning of the term ‘person aggrieved’ in the ADJR Act beyond its normal application. Under section 487, a person, an organisation or an association (whether incorporated or not) is taken to be a person aggrieved for the purposes of making an application for judicial review under the ADJR Act if: In the case of a person – he or she is an Australian citizen or ordinarily resident in Australia or an external Territory. In the case of an organisation or association – the organisation or association is incorporated or was otherwise established, in Australia or an external Territory and has included in its objects or purpose, the protection or conservation of, or research into, the environment. At any time in the two years immediately before the relevant decision, failure or conduct to which the application relates, the person, organisation or association has engaged in a series of activities in Australia or an external Territory for protection or conservation of, or research into, the environment. There must be a genuine and consistent pattern of such activities for there to be ‘a series’ of activities. Associated with this, section 488 provides that a person acting on behalf of an unincorporated organisation is also a ‘person aggrieved’, and therefore may also apply for review under the ADJR Act. Groups, which might include groups concerned with farming activities or land-use, that cannot show that they meet the tests around having a clearly environmental purpose or engaging in environmental activities, would not fall within the scope of section 487. 4. EXPERIENCE OF THIRD PARTY APPLICATIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW BASED ON SECTION 487 The Department’s experience of judicial review under section 487 of the EBPC Act Third party applicants and their applications Since 2000, 22 different third party applicants have sought judicial review of decisions made by the Minister or his or her delegate under the EBPC Act in reliance on section 487. These third party applicants are usually either environmental and community groups (17 applicants) or individuals (5 applicants). Generally, the third party applicants have challenged decisions concerning: the assessment approach by which a project has been assessed; decisions that an action is a controlled action or not a controlled action; and decisions to approve an action with or without conditions. 3 Third party legal challenges have concerned a variety of projects, including the construction of roads, dams, mines and related infrastructure and residential and commercial developments. The number of third party legal challenges made under section 487 Since the commencement of the EPBC Act in 2000, there have been 375 third party legal challenges to approval decisions made under Part 7, 9 and 10 of the EPBC Act, which concerned 23 separate projects.6 A detailed breakdown of these legal challenges is set out in Attachment A. From the commencement of the EBPC Act in 2000 until 19 August 2015, the Minister or his or her delegate approved 817 projects under the EBPC Act. This is distinct from the number of projects referred to the Department, which did not require approval. Since 2000, the Department has been referred around 5,364 projects. EPBC Act approvals are the subject of an assessment process undertaken by the Department which generally results in the imposition of conditions designed to ensure that environmental concerns are addressed and managed. In many cases proponents also improve their proposals in response to issues and concerns raised by the Department and by third parties. Third party applicants have been successful in four legal challenges relating to three separate projects. In addition, eight of the 37 legal challenges were discontinued with either the consent of the parties or were withdrawn by the applicant. The basis of third party legal challenges to EPBC Act decisions Third party legal challenges have been made to EPBC Act approval decisions on a range of grounds, including that the decision maker: did not take into account relevant considerations; took into account irrelevant considerations; or provided insufficient time for particular elements of the decision process. In most cases, the question of what is relevant or not relevant, sufficient or insufficient, centres on an interpretation of the requirements of the EPBC Act and related laws.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia
    Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia Clare Parker BMusSt, BA(Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Discipline of History, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Adelaide. August 2013 ii Contents Contents ii Abstract iv Declaration vi Acknowledgements vii List of Abbreviations ix List of Figures x A Note on Terms xi Introduction 1 Chapter 1: ‘The Practice of Sound Morality’ 21 Policing Abortion and Homosexuality 24 Public Conversation 36 The Wowser State 44 Chapter 2: A Path to Abortion Law Reform 56 The 1930s: Doctors, Court Cases and Activism 57 World War II 65 The Effects of Thalidomide 70 Reform in Britain: A Seven Month Catalyst for South Australia 79 Chapter 3: The Abortion Debates 87 The Medical Profession 90 The Churches 94 Activism 102 Public Opinion and the Media 112 The Parliamentary Debates 118 Voting Patterns 129 iii Chapter 4: A Path to Homosexual Law Reform 139 Professional Publications and Prohibited Literature 140 Homosexual Visibility in Australia 150 The Death of Dr Duncan 160 Chapter 5: The Homosexuality Debates 166 Activism 167 The Churches and the Medical Profession 179 The Media and Public Opinion 185 The Parliamentary Debates 190 1973 to 1975 206 Conclusion 211 Moral Law Reform and the Public Interest 211 Progressive Reform in South Australia 220 The Slippery Slope 230 Bibliography 232 iv Abstract This thesis examines the circumstances that permitted South Australia’s pioneering legalisation of abortion and male homosexual acts in 1969 and 1972. It asks how and why, at that time in South Australian history, the state’s parliament was willing and able to relax controls over behaviours that were traditionally considered immoral.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Women, Past and Present
    Diversity in Leadership Australian women, past and present Diversity in Leadership Australian women, past and present Edited by Joy Damousi, Kim Rubenstein and Mary Tomsic Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Diversity in leadership : Australian women, past and present / Joy Damousi, Kim Rubenstein, Mary Tomsic, editors. ISBN: 9781925021707 (paperback) 9781925021714 (ebook) Subjects: Leadership in women--Australia. Women--Political activity--Australia. Businesswomen--Australia. Women--Social conditions--Australia Other Authors/Contributors: Damousi, Joy, 1961- editor. Rubenstein, Kim, editor. Tomsic, Mary, editor. Dewey Number: 305.420994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2014 ANU Press Contents Introduction . 1 Part I. Feminist perspectives and leadership 1 . A feminist case for leadership . 17 Amanda Sinclair Part II. Indigenous women’s leadership 2 . Guthadjaka and Garŋgulkpuy: Indigenous women leaders in Yolngu, Australia-wide and international contexts . 39 Gwenda Baker, Joanne Garŋgulkpuy and Kathy Guthadjaka 3 . Aunty Pearl Gibbs: Leading for Aboriginal rights . 53 Rachel Standfield, Ray Peckham and John Nolan Part III. Local and global politics 4 . Women’s International leadership . 71 Marilyn Lake 5 . The big stage: Australian women leading global change . 91 Susan Harris Rimmer 6 . ‘All our strength, all our kindness and our love’: Bertha McNamara, bookseller, socialist, feminist and parliamentary aspirant .
    [Show full text]
  • Asylum Seekers and Australian Politics, 1996-2007
    ASYLUM SEEKERS AND AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, 1996-2007 Bette D. Wright, BA(Hons), MA(Int St) Discipline of Politics & International Studies (POLIS) School of History and Politics The University of Adelaide, South Australia A Thesis Presented to the School of History and Politics In the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Contents DECLARATION ................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. v CHAPTER 1: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................. 1 Sovereignty, the nation-state and stateless people ............................................................. 1 Nationalism and Identity .................................................................................................. 11 Citizenship, Inclusion and Exclusion ............................................................................... 17 Justice and human rights .................................................................................................. 20 CHAPTER 2: REFUGEE ISSUES & THEORETICAL REFLECTIONS ......................... 30 Who
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Canberra Press Gallery: Life in the Wedding Cake of Old
    INSIDE the CANBERRA PRESS GALLERY Life in the Wedding Cake of Old Parliament House INSIDE the CANBERRA PRESS GALLERY Life in the Wedding Cake of Old Parliament House Rob Chalmers Edited by Sam Vincent and John Wanna THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Chalmers, Rob, 1929-2011 Title: Inside the Canberra press gallery : life in the wedding cake of Old Parliament House / Rob Chalmers ; edited by Sam Vincent and John Wanna. ISBN: 9781921862366 (pbk.) 9781921862373 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Australia. Parliament--Reporters and Government and the press--Australia. Journalism--Political aspects-- Press and politics--Australia. Other Authors/Contributors: Vincent, Sam. Wanna, John. Dewey Number: 070.4493240994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Back cover image courtesy of Heide Smith Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2011 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Foreword . ix Preface . xi 1 . Youth . 1 2 . A Journo in Sydney . 9 3 . Inside the Canberra Press Gallery . 17 4 . Menzies: The giant of Australian politics . 35 5 . Ming’s Men . 53 6 . Parliament Disgraced by its Members . 71 7 . Booze, Sex and God .
    [Show full text]
  • Reports and Proceedings No 46
    Reports and Proceedings . SOCIALWELFARE RESEARCH CENTRE Ethnicity, Class and Social Policy in Australia by Andrew Jakubowicz, Michael Morrissey and Joanne Palser [I THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES (I (I P 0 BOX 1 • KENSINGTON • NEW SOUTH WALES • 2033 • AUSTRALIA ~ For further enquiries about the work ofthe Centre, or about purchasing our publications, please contact the Publications Officer, SPRC, University of New South Wales, PO Box 1, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia. Telephone (02) 697 3857. Fax: (02) 313 8367. ISSN 0159 9607 ISBN 85823 456 4 First printing May 1984 Reprinted May 1990 Reprinted September 1993 As with all issues in the Reports and Proceedings Series, the views expressed in this publication do not represent any official position on the part ofthe Centre. The Reports and Proceedings Series is produced to make available the research findings of individual authors, and to promote the development of ideas and discussions about major areas of concern in the field of social policy. -i- CONTENTS Preface 11 Chapter 1: Key Concepts .1 Migration and economic development 1 .2 Capitalism and social policy 3 .3 Roles of the state 5 .4 Social control and policy formulation 7 .5 "Culture" and ethnicity 10 .6 Ethnicity, class and social policy 17 Chapter 2: Class Relations and the Migration Program .1 The Homogeneous society: post-war reconstruction 20 .2 Migration and labour force discipline 23 .3 Assimilation as social policy 27 .4 Conflict and Order 31 Chapter 3: The Long Boom .1 Changing Class Relations 35 .2 Race and Class 39
    [Show full text]
  • Energy for Change Annual Report 2017–2018 Imagine a World Where Our Strategy Forests, Rivers, People, Oceans and Wildlife Change the Story Stories Matter
    Energy for change Annual report 2017–2018 Imagine a world where Our strategy forests, rivers, people, oceans and wildlife Change the story Stories matter. They shape what people see thrive. This is the world as possible. That’s why we’re disrupting the old story that destruction is inevitable. We we can see. This is the are seeding new stories of hope, courage and world we are creating. connection to inspire people to act. Who are we? Build people power We are building a wave of people who care We are Australia’s national environment and act into powerful, organised communities. organisation. We are more than half a million Together, we’re holding decision makers to people who speak out, show up and act for a account, pushing for real change and creating a world where all life thrives. We are proudly better world. independent, non-partisan and funded by donations from Australians. Fix the system We can’t fix the pollution and extinction crisis one spot fire at a time. That’s why we’re taking on the big structural challenges – laws, institutions and decisions – so we can keep enjoying life in this beautiful country. Cover. Green Turtle, Great Barrier Reef. Annual report 2017–2018 Left. Helmeted Honeyeater. Photo. Aaron Stevenson Contents Message from the President and CEO ............................................................................................................... 3 Our Board ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stop Uranium Mining!
    Stop Uranium Mining! Australia’s Decade of Protest 1975-85 Greg Adamson 2 Stop Uranium Mining! Contents Introduction.................................................................................. 3 1. Origins of the Australian anti-uranium campaign................... 5 2. An anti-uranium mining movement emerges.........................10 3. The struggle against uranium enters the labour movement.............................................................14 4. 1977-78: anti-uranium movement debates strategy..............18 5. The mass movement defeats Fraser.....................................22 6. Labor betrays the anti-uranium movement............................26 7. Why Labor mined uranium.......................................................30 8. The new mass anti-nuclear movement..................................34 9. The rise of anti-nuclear political action.................................39 10. The political establishment closes ranks............................43 About the author Greg Adamson was a longtime anti-uranium and anti-nuclear activist. He is the author of We All Live on Three Mile Island: The Case Against Nuclear Power (Pathfinder Press [Resistance Books], Sydney, 1981) and 25 Years of Secondary Student Revolt (Resistance, Sydney, 1993). He is a member of the Socialist Alliance. Resistance Books 1999 ISBN 0909196893 Published by Resistance Books, resistancebooks.com Introduction The election of John Howard as Australian prime minister in 1996 ushered in an new wave of enthusiasm for radioactive adventure. Nuclear testing was the fad of the 1950s. The 1960s saw plans for nuclear explosions to create new harbors along the coastline. In the 1970s state premiers vied to attract uranium enrichment plants. In the early 1980s the plans were to surround the cities with nuclear power plants. Today as we approach the new millennium, the call has gone out for Australia to become the world’s dumping ground for radioactive waste.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 855Am | Digital | 3Cr.Org.Au Cram 2014 3Cr Staff 2014 Management Committee
    2014 855AM | DIGITAL | 3CR.ORG.AU CRAM 2014 3CR STAFF 2014 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The CRAM guide is Station Manager Chairperson made with the generous Marian McKeown contribution of the writers, James McKenzie photographers and 3CR Programme Coordinator programmers. Vice Chairpersons Gabrielle Reade Pat Khor CRAM Editor Therese Virtue Office Coordinator Meg Butler Helen Howard / Loretta O’Brien Treasurer Design and Layout Perambalam Senthooran Current Affairs Coordinator Rachel Kirby Ronny Kareni Secretary Contributors Terry Costello Projects Coordinator Marian McKeown Juliet Fox Directors Helen Gwilliam Bill Deller Promotions Coordinator Trevor Grant Diana Beaumont Meg Butler Areej Nur Gonzalo Illesca Gab Reade Training Coordinator Helen Gwilliam Nicole Hurtubise Leanne McLean Marisol Salinas Juliet Fox Volunteer Coordinator Liz Wright Beth Askam Rachel Kirby Nicole Hurtubise Leanne McLean Annie McLoughlin Technical Coordinator Emma Russell Greg Segal Lourdes Garcia-Larque Liz Wright Technical Assistant Lara Soulio Riah Williams Belinda Lo I.T Worker Piergiorio Moro Luke Neeson Paul Elliott Accountant Jonathan Pipke Denis West Annie McLoughlin WE ARE PROUD TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE WURUNDJERI PEOPLE AS THE TRADITIONAL OWNERS OF THIS LAND CONTENTS... Resistance Radio 3 Aboriginal Women’s Radio Training Project 4 Black Block 4 Sista Resistance 5 Resistencia 6 Program Coordinator 8 Current Affairs Coordinator 8 Turning 40 in 2016 9 Lest We Forget 10 No Place For A Child 11 RadioActive Tour 13 Program Updates 14 National Programs 15 Awards 16 3CR
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Page
    CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 1. RELEVANCE OF SUBMISSION TO TERMS OF REFERENCE 8 1.1 Matters to be addressed by submission 1.2 Focus on radioactive waste management 1.3 The previous attempt to establish a national radioactive waste management facility in South Australia 1.4 Disclaimer – submission not technical, environmental or commercial 2. BACKGROUND – THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA – A 70 YEAR 12 JOURNEY SO FAR 2.1 A long history 2.2 A continuing journey 2.3 The history and background lend themselves to a mature debate about South Australia’s nuc lear future 3. WHICH JURISDICTION SHOULD REGULATE THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY? 17 3.1 An issue unresolved which the Royal Commission needs to consider 3.2 1958 3.3 Constitutional recognition of a nuclear industry in Australia? 3.4 The debate continues into the 1960s 3.5 Continuing inaction through the 1960s 3.6 The 1970s 3.7 The South Australian Energy Committee and the conclusion of the Fox Inquiry 3.8 The Federal Government continues to deliberate without deciding 3.9 For the rest of the 20 th Century jurisdictional uncertainty continues 3.10 The 21 st Century and jurisdictional position remains unclear 3.11 The uncertainty to continue 1 4. RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 38 4.1 The consequences of regulatory uncertainty 4.2 The origins of radioactive waste in Australia 4.3 A developing international consensus 4.4 1964 – first attempt at national coordination 4.5 Australian nuclear electricity and the waste implications 4.6 The Australian Ionising Radiation Advisory Council 4.7 Australia’s
    [Show full text]
  • Representation and Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam
    Vietnam Generation Volume 3 Number 2 Australia R&R: Representation and Article 1 Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam 1-1991 Australia R&R: Representation and Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation (1991) "Australia R&R: Representation and Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 3 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol3/iss2/1 This Complete Volume is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ON THIS SITE WILL BE ERECTED A MEMORIAL FOR THOSE WHO DIED & SERVED IN THE VIETNAM WAR maoKJwmiiMisanc? wmmEsnp jnauKi«mmi KXm XHURST rw svxr Representations and Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam Edited by Jeff Doyle & Jeffrey Grey Australia ReJR Representations and Reinterpretations o f Australia's war in Vietnam Edited by Jeff Doyle & Jeffrey Grey V ietnam Generation, I n c & Burning Cities Press Australia ReJR is published as a Special Issue of Vietnam Generation Vietnam Generation was founded in 1988 to promote and encourage interdisciplinary study of the Vietnam War era and the Vietnam War generation. The journal is published by Vietnam Generation, Inc., a nonprofit corporation devoted to promoting scholarship on recent history and contemporary issues. Vietnam Generation, Inc. Vice-President President Secretary, Treasurer HERMAN BEAVERS KALI TAL CYNTHIA FUCHS General Editor Newsletter Editor Technical Assistance KALI TAL DAN DUFFY LAWRENCE E HUNTER Advisory Board NANCY AN1SFIELD MICHAEL KLEIN WILLIAM J.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia and the Vietnam War: a Select Bibliography Jeffrey Grey
    Vietnam Generation Volume 3 Number 2 Australia R&R: Representation and Article 11 Reinterpretations of Australia's War in Vietnam 1-1991 Australia and the Vietnam War: A Select Bibliography Jeffrey Grey Jeff oD yle Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Grey, Jeffrey and Doyle, Jeff (1991) Aus" tralia and the Vietnam War: A Select Bibliography," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 3 : No. 2 , Article 11. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol3/iss2/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Australia and Vietnam War—A Select Bibliography. Jeff Doyle and Jeffrey Grey Introduction In keeping with the wide range of concerns of the essays in this volume the bibliography has attempted to cover as many “subject headings” as seemed possible. Thus while the title “Select Bibliography” suggests that the compilers have collected only the major “texts” of concern, the following lists are an attempt to be as complete as possible at the time of final compilation. “Select” is meant to convey the fact that the editors are certain (most likely the only certainty prevailing in scholarly life) that the lists are not complete. This incompletion applies to some areas more than to others. Newspapers and the general daily print media, and their radio and television equivalent news industries are the chief areas of extreme selection.
    [Show full text]
  • 14. Labor out of the Wilderness
    14. Labor Out of the Wilderness In March 1963, The Daily Telegraph published a bombshell picture of the Opposition Leader, Arthur Calwell, and his deputy, Gough Whitlam, waiting in the dead of night outside the Kingston Hotel for 36 members of the specially convened ALP National Conference to vote on the Menzies Government’s legislation for a US naval communications base at North West Cape in Western Australia. This gave Whitlam a powerful weapon in his mission to transform the Australian Labor Party into a democratic national institution. Many inside and outside the Labor Party today would argue it is far from a truly democratic party. This is fair criticism, but when compared with the Liberal Party (Australia’s most successful postwar party), the Labor Party is far more democratic. Under Prime Minister John Howard, who over four parliamentary terms assumed the role of an elected dictator, the federal parliamentary Liberal Party was less democratic than ever. Whitlam’s achievements were at least as great when in opposition as when he was Prime Minister. Whitlam ranks with Menzies as one of Australia’s most significant political leaders. Menzies came back from his failed prewar career to unite the dispirited and impotent conservatives and overthrow a socialist Labor government that appeared to have a stranglehold on power. Whitlam brought together a divided and hopeless Labor Party to return it to power after its longest period in opposition, and changed politics profoundly. To the astonishment of the nation, Whitlam was sacked by the Governor-General, Sir John Kerr, on Remembrance Day, 11 November 1975, despite having the confidence of the Lower House of Parliament both before and after his sacking.
    [Show full text]