DOCSLIB.ORG

Communists and the Labour Party

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FILE , I cnpv National ~ Left·Wing Movement Islington Poland NUM Middle East ::.;:~:;:;:;:;::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:;:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~::::::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:;:;~~~~~: THE HEALTH Smash,the anti-union laws. Al.-MOST FIVE MONTHS after workers against the Tories. Miners, Bill 't~e designed to destroy. Effective he firSt stoppage during the dockers and, of cour,se, tile Fleet St. working class action is ,to be made totally illegal by the Tories. Suc­ ealth dispute, the TUC has at electricians, hBve. all '$taged solidarity stoppages. But the TUC leaders have cessful action in support of the health last named the date for a Day of been running scared of a showdown workers must bring the organised Action, by all its ~embers, in with the Tories. Even now, when the working class into a collision with the battle could have threatened to spear­ the health workers and on strength­ support of the health workers. TUC is eventually forced into supp­ law. The Tories will not hesitate to head a struggle against the Tories ening their anti-union legal machinery They have asked all workers to orti ng action, because neither the use that law if they think they can throughout the public sector. But with yet another round of anti- get away with it. Victory in this in­ stop work for at least an hour in Tories nor the workers will budge, the prospect of such struggles terrifies union legislation aimed at making they refuse to issue any clear call for stance is sure to embolden them in the TUC leaders. Each time they have secret ballots for union officials and in solidarity on Septemller 22nd. strike action which would break the future. That is why they will only worked like demons to defuse the industrial action compulsory. Already the NUM and the GM Prior's Employment Act. The pathetic be beaten by action that will secure conflict. They stabbed both the steel The course they are set on is one WU have committed themselves Albert Spanswick, of COHSE, is still full victory for the healthworkers and workers and ASLEF in the back, It of inflicting a lasting defeat on the to action. It is down to militants on record as saying he would prefer and consign all of their anti-union is, therefore, vital that the organisation organisations, services and Iivi ng laws to the dustbin. everywhere to make sure that the unions to get their members. out for the 22nd of September is not standards of the working class. To­ with an unofficial, "nod and a wink" This is not the first time that the left in the hands of the TUC leaders day the NHS workers are in the September 22nd. becomes a one so as not to break the Tory laws working class has found itself on the and that the TUC plans to organise firing line. Tomorrow other public day general strike - and it will against "secondary action". verge of a generalised offensive it as only a one-off day of protest sector workers will be faci ng the be the work of the militants, not The entire course of the health against this Tory government. In must be spiked. It must become the same intransigent government. Private the TUC leaders, that ensures the dispute has proved the need for org· 1980, the steelworkers stood poised launching pad for an onslaught on the sector workers have, and will again, anised solidarity stoppages, blacking to be joined by a general strike in that the day is a success. Tories. suffer the blight of low wages and un­ and picketing in orderto beat the South Wales that could have turned Delegate action committees of employment thanks to the Tories' Throughout the dispute there has Tories. It is, however, precisely the tide against the Tories. Early this health workers and representatives of policies. For these reasons Septem­ been ample evidence of mass rank and these working class weapons that the this summer ASLEF action, if it had all workers due to take action must ber 22nd must be the beginning of and file support for the health Prior anti-union law and Tebbitt's been linked to the healthworkers be formed in each locality. They a class-wide offensive against the should organise the sol idarity pickets Tories. Solidarity strike action from f9r the 22nd, recognising that effect­ unions, such as the miners, along- ive solidarity with the health workers side all-out strike action by the means breaking the Tory law. They health workers, are the goals that should remain in operation after the militants fighting for mobilisations Boycott Foot's register 22nd - the law will not be beaten on the 22nd must set for themselves. and the health workers will not win As the fining of Geraghty shows, THIS YEAR'S LABOUR party as recruiting sergeants for Margaret increasingly mindful of an impending in one day. Rank and file organisa­ however, the health dispute has high­ conference promises to register Thatcher's imperialist war against ' election and doubtless aware of Foot's tions of militants in the localities lighted the class-wide implications Argentina, there is not one resolution potential as an electoral albatross, must be held together to carry on ' of the Tories' laws. So, the 22nd the g~ins that the Labour Right that so much as attemjrts to cell the victories for the Right ,at conference the fight that the leaders are, in fact, must become not only the starting has made over the last year. The NEC and the PLP to account. This could, well be followed up by a drive seeking to limit. point for real solidarity action to last twelve months have Ilorne makes a mockery of the claims of the to install a new hard right leader atop Po;;sibly the Tories, or an indi­ win the health strike but also a out all too clearly Workers' Left that their constitutional vic­ a rightist NEC. Murray and the TUC vidual employer, will invoke the GENERAL STRIKE aimed at tories put them in a position to con­ General Cou,ncil manouevred desper­ Employment Act before the 22nd. smashing the Tories' anti-union laws, Power's judgement that the 1981 The TUC, and each individual union the existing ones and the ones being conference represented, "a de­ trol the PLP. ately before the TUC conference to All the evidence suggests that it refer back the AUEW Construction must Qe forced to state now that they pushed through Parliament by Tory cisive victory for the anti-reform, is now the right who are making the Section's bid to tie the TUC to opp­ will declare all strikes in defiance hit-man Norman Tebbitt. anti-Benn forces" (WP 26). The running. Not only have they pushed osing all incomes policies in whatever of court orders to be official and re­ No effort must be spared to guar­ Right, in conjunction with the the register through the N EC. They guise. The TUC tops and the Labour fuse to squander one penny of union antee that the 22nd September is a are well placed this year to act on Right still hold out the hope of funds on paying fines for their mem­ day of ALL OUT STRIKE. Leaflets, main trade union leaders, are out bers. No recognition of the Tory law bulletins and work-time meetings to cap their gains with confer.;. their carefiJlly leaked 'hit list' and to taking a purged Labour Party to shift the N EC further to the rig lit. triumph at the polls on a platform of in any form -that must be the must be organised to put the case ence acceptance of the NEC's Huckfield seems set to be replaced by incomes policy, import controls and battlecry of all organised worker •. across. But militants must have no witch hunt proposal for a'Reg­ Foot's nominee, Evans. At present the national reconciliation. The Econo­ Succ,essful action on September illusions. Only an indefinite general gossip column reports of bureau­ mist is correct when it reports that 22nd, however, will not send the strike will destroy the plans of the ister of non-affiliated groups'. Tories into immeaiate retreat. They government.. It is symptomatic of the weak­ cratic bar-room preparations to oust the Right in the Labour Party and TU have ~ak~ thei~ future on breaking ness of Labour's left that the prin­ Foot seem premature. But Foot has TUC now, "hope they can put the cipal resolutions they have managed always been a 'caretaker' candidate horrors of the last three years behind to place on the conference agenda for the Right during the period in them." are of an entirely defensive character. which they groomed a new candidate The ,determination of the Right and They primarily concentrate on trying and organised to re-assert their grip on and its not so 'soft left' allies of the to stop the NEC's witchunting plans. on the party. , All out Sept 22nd Despite the Labour front bench's role With the trade union bureaucrats CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 • PAGE 3 - "Islington Council should draw up a~.!'tailed assessment of how much extra' money' we 'Will need "from th"e Government to c-rry out the manifesto commitments without pbcing extra uurdenJ; on Is· linyton tenents and ratepayers. We should',then go Oi{t ,and publicise the facts in a mas~ive ca"mpaign , among tenents. council workers,and community ~<J<oups ~xplaining. in si!1lple te~.ms;'What the ,benefits shouldb"eilnd why they should joijlWith us to de­ mand ihe governmllnts pays up:"_ (SO 9,5) ,.
Recommended publications
  • British Domestic Security Policy and Communist Subversion: 1945-1964

    British Domestic Security Policy and Communist Subversion: 1945-1964

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo British Domestic Security Policy and Communist Subversion: 1945-1964 William Styles Corpus Christi College, University of Cambridge September 2016 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy William Styles British Domestic Security Policy and Communist Subversion: 1945-1964 This thesis is concerned with an analysis of British governmental attitudes and responses to communism in the United Kingdom during the early years of the Cold War, from the election of the Attlee government in July 1945 up until the election of the Wilson government in October 1964. Until recently the topic has been difficult to assess accurately, due to the scarcity of available original source material. However, as a result of multiple declassifications of both Cabinet Office and Security Service files over the past five years it is now possible to analyse the subject in greater depth and detail than had been previously feasible. The work is predominantly concerned with four key areas: firstly, why domestic communism continued to be viewed as a significant threat by successive governments – even despite both the ideology’s relatively limited popular support amongst the general public and Whitehall’s realisation that the Communist Party of Great Britain presented little by way of a direct challenge to British political stability. Secondly, how Whitehall’s understanding of the nature and severity of the threat posed by British communism developed between the late 1940s and early ‘60s, from a problem considered mainly of importance only to civil service security practices to one which directly impacted upon the conduct of educational policy and labour relations.
  • 1 Alexander Bogdanov and the Short History of the Kultintern1 by John Biggart to the Extent That There Was a Mainstream View

    1 Alexander Bogdanov and the Short History of the Kultintern1 by John Biggart to the Extent That There Was a Mainstream View

    Alexander Bogdanov and the short history of the Kultintern 1 by John Biggart To the extent that there was a mainstream view within the RSDRP before February 1917 as to the kind of political and economic system that would emerge in Russia in the event of the autocracy being overthrown, it was that the successor régime would be a democratic republic and that the role of the RSDRP would be oppositional, pending a transition to socialism. The general line of the Bolsheviks on the question was articulated in a resolution “On the present conjuncture and the tasks of the party”, adopted at the All-Russian Conference of the RSDRP held in Paris from 3 - 9 January 1909 (Western calendar)2 and re-affirmed at the narrowly based conference convened by Lenin in Prague from 18-30 January 1912 (Western calendar).3 In 1909, the first “task” of the “socialist proletariat” had been defined as being “the overthrow of Tsarism, the conquest of political power by the proletariat with the help of the revolutionary strata of the peasantry,4 the outcome of which will be a bourgeois-democratic revolution brought about through 1 This is a revised version of an article that first appeared in Vestnik Mezhdunarodnogo Instituta A.Bogdanova [Bulletin of the International Bogdanov Institute], 2001 No.3 (7), pp.76–87. 2 The corresponding Russian dates were 21–27 December 1908. The conference was attended, for the Bolsheviks, by 6 local worker delegates (10 had been elected); 4 Mensheviks (three émigrés, including Fedor Dan and Paul Axelrod and one worker delegate from the Ukraine); 3 delegates nominated by the Bund; and 5 Polish Social Democrats who voted consistently with the “orthodox” Bolsheviks (as Proletarii described the Lenin group).

  • Communists Text

    The University of Manchester Research Communists and British Society 1920-1991 Document Version Proof Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Morgan, K., Cohen, G., & Flinn, A. (2007). Communists and British Society 1920-1991. Rivers Oram Press. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:30. Sep. 2021 INTRODUCTION A dominant view of the communist party as an institution is that it provided a closed, well-ordered and intrusive political environment. The leading French scholars Claude Pennetier and Bernard Pudal discern in it a resemblance to Erving Goffman’s concept of a ‘total institution’. Brigitte Studer, another international authority, follows Sigmund Neumann in referring to it as ‘a party of absolute integration’; tran- scending national distinctions, at least in the Comintern period (1919–43) it is supposed to have comprised ‘a unitary system—which acted in an integrative fashion world-wide’.1 For those working within the so-called ‘totalitarian’ paradigm, the validity of such ‘total’ or ‘absolute’ concep- tions of communist politics has always been axiomatic.
  • 1 Alexander Bogdanov and the Short History of the Kultintern 1 by John

    1 Alexander Bogdanov and the Short History of the Kultintern 1 by John

    Alexander Bogdanov and the short history of the Kultintern 1 by John Biggart This is a revised version of an article that first appeared in Vestnik Mezhdunarodnogo Instituta A. Bogdanova [Bulletin of the International Bogdanov Institute] 2001 No.3 (7), pp.76–87. To the extent that there was a mainstream view within the RSDRP before February 1917 as to the kind of political and economic system that would emerge in Russia in the event of the autocracy being overthrown, it was that the successor régime would be a democratic republic and that the role of the RSDRP would be oppositional, pending a transition to socialism. The general line of the Bolsheviks on the question was articulated in a resolution “On the present conjuncture and the tasks of the party”, adopted at the All-Russian Conference of the RSDRP held in Paris from 3 - 9 January 1909 (Western calendar) 2 and re-affirmed at the narrowly based conference convened by Lenin in Prague from 18-30 January 1912 (Western calendar).3 In 1909, the first “task” of the “socialist proletariat” had been defined as being “the overthrow of Tsarism, the conquest of political power by the proletariat with the help of the revolutionary strata of the peasantry,4 the outcome of which will be a bourgeois-democratic revolution brought about through 1 Revision of November 2018. 2 The corresponding Russian dates were 21–27 December 1908. The conference was attended, for the Bolsheviks, by 6 local worker delegates (10 had been elected); 4 Mensheviks (three émigrés, including Fedor Dan and Paul Axelrod and one worker delegate from the Ukraine); 3 delegates nominated by the Bund; and 5 Polish Social Democrats who voted consistently with the “orthodox” Bolsheviks (as Proletarii described the Lenin group).
  • Working Class Adult Education in Yorkshire 1918 – 1939

    Working Class Adult Education in Yorkshire 1918 – 1939

    Working Class Adult Education in Yorkshire 1918 – 1939 Christine Pushpa Kumbhat Submitted in accordance with the requirements for degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History December 2017 ii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Professor Richard Whiting and Professor Malcolm Chase for their patience, encouragement and calm guidance over the course of my PhD research. Richard Whiting’s observations, comments and suggestions have always brought clarity to my thoughts and arguments. His unruffled, measured, incisive and constructive approach kept me on track for the duration. Malcolm Chase’s recommended readings throughout added quality and depth to the final thesis. My navigation of the seas of historical research had the potential to be stormy. With the supervision I received, the outlook was generally clear and the going good. For his good humour, kindness, encouragement and unwavering support, my thanks to Peter, always. iv Abstract This thesis considers the place of workers’ adult education in the world of the British labour movement, and what impact it may have had on worker-students as citizens. It concentrates on three voluntary working class adult education organisations – the Workers’ Educational Association (WEA), The National Council of Labour Colleges (NCLC), and the Co-operative. The WEA delivered an impartial, non-sectarian, non-political programme of education in the liberal arts and humanities with the support of universities and Local Education Authorities.
  • Image of the Region in Eurasian Studies

    Image of the Region in Eurasian Studies

    IMAGE OF THE REGION IN EURASIAN STUDIES IMAGE OF THE REGION IN EURASIAN STUDIES Edited by Suchandana Chatterjee Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies Kolkata in association with KNOWLEDGE WORLD KW Publishers Pvt Ltd New Delhi 2011 BEST PUBLISHERS AWARD (ENGLISH) The Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies (MAKAIAS) is an autonomous body under the Ministry of Culture, Government of India. It was set up at the joint initiative of the Government of India, Department of Culture, Ministry of Human Resource Development and the Government of West Bengal. Based in Kolkata, it was registered as a Society under the West Bengal Registration of Societies’ Act of 1961 on the 4th of January 1993, with Prof. Nurul Hasan, the then Governor of West Bengal, as the President of the Society. It is funded by the Department of Culture, Government of India. Presently, His Excellency, Governor of West Bengal, is the President of the Society. MAKAIAS is a centre for research and learning with a focus on social cultural, economic and political / administrative developments in Asia from the middle of the 19th Century onwards, with special emphasis on their links with India, and also on the life and works of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad. It operates out of Azad Bhavan in Salt Lake as well as the Maulana Azad Museum located in the erstwhile residence of Maulana Azad at 5 Ashraf Mistry Lane, Kolkata. © 2013, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies (MAKAIS) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner.