DOCSLIB.ORG

WHAT WE HEARD Report to Council | January 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WHAT WE HEARD Report to Council | January 2020 Summer Village of Poplar Bay WHAT WE HEARD Report to Council | January 2020 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................................. I OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 WHAT WE HEARD .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF RESIDENT FEEDBACK .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 SUMMARY AGENCY FEEDBACK.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 APPENDIX A ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 NEWSLETTER ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 OPEN HOUSE DETAILS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 OPEN HOUSE FEEDBACK ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 MDP SURVEY RESPONSES ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 AGENCY RESPONSES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 17 1 OVERVIEW This What We Heard report provides a summary of the public engagement and the feedback received regarding the draft Municipal Development Plan for the Summer Village of Crystal Springs. The details of the public engagement and the feedback received are outlined in Appendix A. In July 2019, a newsletter was mailed out to residents providing residents with a project update, details of the Open House, and information regarding opportunities to participate in the project and provide feedback. The newsletter was posted on the Summer Village website along with a survey for residents to complete. In August 2019, Summer Village Administration and Municipal Planning Services (MPS) held an Open House for Poplar Bay to provide residents with information about the project, review the contents of the proposed draft MDP, and gather feedback from residents. In August 2019, the draft MDP was posted on the Summer Village website for residents to review and it was also referred to various agencies for comments. WHAT WE HEARD The section below summarizes What We Heard from residents and agencies regarding the draft MDP in August and September 2019. Where necessary, MPS has outlined recommended changes to the draft MDP. SUMMARY OF RESIDENT FEEDBACK MPS received seventeen (17) MDP survey responses and one (1) open house feedback form. The detailed summary of the responses is outlined in Appendix A. 1. DEMOGRAPHICS & LAKE USE WHAT WE HEARD MPS RESPONSE / RECOMMENDATION 71% of respondents are long-time residents (10 years or This information helped MPS understand who lives in the more) community and how residents view the use of Pigeon Lake. 65% of respondents reside seasonally Recommendation: Changes to the MDP are not required. 33% of respondents would consider moving to the lake permanently 95% of respondents are age 50+ 52% of respondents own a lakeside lot 76% respondents believe the lake is adequately used on weekends 17% of respondents participate in winter activities at the lake 2 2. DEVELOPMENT WHAT WE HEARD MPS RESPONSE / RECOMMENDATION 55% of respondents believe there should be setbacks Policy 5.2.1 Policy requires a development setback as per for development the requirements in the Land Use Bylaw (currently 6m). An There was mixed feedback on the setback distance: increased setback was not recommended due to the 14% of respondents believe the current 6m setback significant variation in lot length within the Summer Village. should remain as is, 72% of respondents believe the Policy 5.4.5 encourages a minimum of 25% of the area of setback should 10m or more the lot not covered by buildings as permeable or semi- 64% of respondents think that the amount of non- permeable surfaces. The policy limits the amount of non- permeable surfaces allowed on a residential lot should permeable surfaces by requiring a minimum amount of be limited permeable or semi-permeable surfaces. By determining There was mixed feedback on the percentage of non- the minimum amount based on the area of the lot not permeable surfaces that should be allowed on a covered by buildings, complying with the policy is feasible residential lot for lots with smaller areas. Recommendation: Changes to the MDP are not required. 3. ENVIRONMENT WHAT WE HEARD MPS RESPONSE / RECOMMENDATION 75% of respondents do not experience flooding on their This information helped MPS understand the types of lot issues residents experience related to flooding, ice damage, Surface water management: and drainage. o Flows over property to the lake The importance of permeable surfaces for improving o Infrastructure (ditches, sump pumps, etc.) to help drainage and enabling the water to absorb into the ground manage runoff was a common theme in the feedback. The provision of 82% of respondents do not experience ice damage on permeable/semi-permeable surfaces in Policy 5.4.5 their property. (described above) is an important component of the MDP Hazards identified: to help limit drainage of water directly into Pigeon Lake. o High water table Additionally, the policies in Section 6 The Pigeon Lake o Creek Watershed consider environmental constraints (e.g., steep slopes, erosion, shallow ground water, or high ice damage o Recent work for the sewer system installations has risk, etc.) and require development proponents to affected surface water flow. demonstrate that proposed developments are suitable for the site. These policies is important to ensure development occurs in suitable areas and limits impacts on the lake and its ecosystems. Recommendation: Changes to the MDP are not required. 3 4. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS & COMMENTS Additional comments and concerns are summarized in the table below. WHAT WE HEARD MPS RESPONSE / RECOMMENDATION Clearing of vegetation on reserve parcels The policies in the MDP encourage the preservation of Enforcement of fertilizer bylaw natural areas and the restriction of the fertilizer use, but issues related to enforcement are not relevant for the MDP. Recommendation: Changes to the MDP are not required. SUMMARY AGENCY FEEDBACK MPS received comments from Alberta Health Services, Alberta Transportation, and Atco Gas & Pipeline. Summaries of the key comments relevant to the MDP are outlined in the tables below. 1. ALBERTA HEALTH SERVICES WHAT WE HEARD MPS RESPONSE / RECOMMENDATION Expresses support for the consideration of potential Developments with potential off-site impacts such as impacts of industrial development on adjacent land agricultural, natural resource development and industrial uses including nuisance issues (e.g. noise) and the uses are not allowed in the Summer Village. requirements for risk and environmental impact Recommendation: Changes to the MDP are not required. assessments. Expresses support for the initiatives stated that pertain The policies in the MDP, particularly in Section 5 Future to protecting the natural environment, water quality, Land Use, Section 6 The Pigeon Lake Watershed, and and the watershed. Section 7 Infrastructure support the protection of the Expresses support for discouraging residential Pigeon Lake watershed, conserving environmental development on lands that are subject to flowing or features, and ensuring future land use activities are high water tables. designed to mitigate negative impacts on Pigeon Lake and Expresses support for community designs that the watershed. incorporate the natural environment. Recommendation: Changes to the MDP are not required. Expresses support for the protection of the Pigeon Lake Watershed, especially pertaining to the goals of environmental stewardship, wastewater servicing, and storm water management. Expresses support for intermunicipal collaboration to The policies in Section 4 Intermunicipal Collaboration promote supportive, healthier environments. support collaboration with regional partners, neighbouring municipalities, and other levels of government on initiatives that benefit the region. Recommendation: Changes to the MDP are not required. Expresses support for active transportation Policies in the MDP encourage pedestrian friendly infrastructure. infrastructure including pathways
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bylaw Number 2020/18
    BYLAW NUMBER 2020/18 BYLAW NO. 2020/18 is a bylaw of the County of Wetaskiwin No. 10, in the Province of Alberta, for the purpose of adopting the Intermunicipal Collaboration Framework (“ICF”) between the County of Wetaskiwin No.10, the Summer Village of Grandview, the Summer Village of Norris Beach, the Summer Village of Crystal Springs, and the Summer Village of Poplar Bay (the “Municipalities”) all in the Province of Alberta. WHEREAS The County of Wetaskiwin No.10, the Summer Village of Grandview, the Summer Village of Norris Beach, the Summer Village of Crystal Springs, and the Summer Village of Poplar Bay have common boundaries; and, AND WHEREAS The Municipalities share an interest to provide services in an efficient and collaborative manner, and, AND WHEREAS Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. 2000, Chapter M-26, as amended, a municipality must establish an ICF with other municipalities which share common boundaries; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the County of Wetaskiwin No. 10, duly assembled, hereby enacts as follows: PART 1 – TITLE AND DEFINITIONS 1.1 This bylaw shall be known as the “South Pigeon Lake Intermunicipal Collaboration Framework.” 1.2 Wherever the singular or masculine is used throughout this bylaw, the same shall be construed to mean the plural or feminine respectively where applicable. 1.3 Definitions for the purposes of this bylaw include: (1) “Act” means the Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. 2000, Chapter M-26 as amended; (2) “Terms of Reference” means the terms of reference
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Village of Poplar
    Summer Village of Itaska Bylaw Index 1 November 16, 1953 Mill rate for 1953 2 November 16, 1953 Penalty 5% 3 October 14, 1954 C.D. Denney appointed secretary repealed by #196 4 October 14, 1954 Mill rate for 1954 5 October 14, 1954 Penalty 5% rescinded by #84 6 June 9, 1955 Closing street next to Harold Smith’s 7 September 16, 1955 Zoning By-Law amended by #19 8 June 9, 1955 Speed Limits repealed 9 July 23, 1955 Sale of closed street see bylaw 6 10 July 23, 1955 Mill rate for 1955 11 September 16, 1955 Regulation of Fire Arms 12 September 16, 1955 Penalties for violation of by-laws 13 March 1, 1956 Assessment of personal property 14 April 21, 1956 To authorize Calgary power line 15 June 29, 1956 Mill rate for 1956 16 June 25, 1957 Mill rate for 1957 17 May 15, 1958 Closing of street between McBain and Madison 18 May 15, 1958 Sale of street closed by By-Law 17 19 October 22, 1958 Zoning amendment to By-Law 7 20 June 25, 1958 Mill rate for 1958 21 September 24, 1958 1958 assessment adopted for 1959 22 June 3, 1959 To provide for the licensing of Mobile Homes 23 May 27, 1959 Rates of taxation for the year 1959 24 September 23, 1959 To adopt the current year’s assessment for taxation purposes 1960 25 April 6, 1960 Mill rate for 1960 26 June 1, 1960 To adopt 1960 assessment roll for 1961 27 May 29, 1961 Mill rate for 1961 28 October 18, 1961 To adopt 1961 assessment roll for taxation purposes 29 May 28, 1962 To provide for construction of hard surfaced playing area 30 April 9, 1962 To appoint returning officer and fix date and place for poll
    [Show full text]
  • Disposition 20373-D01-2015
    April 24, 2015 Disposition 20373-D01-2015 FortisAlberta Inc. 320 – 17th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2S 2V1 Attention: Mr. Miles Stroh Director, Regulatory FortisAlberta Inc. 2015 Municipal Assessment Rider A-1 Proceeding 20373 1. The Alberta Utilities Commission received your application dated April 22, 2015, requesting approval of the 2015 municipal assessment Rider A-1 percentages by taxation authority effective July 1, 2015, which is attached as Appendix 1. The percentages were calculated in accordance with Order U2004-192.1 2. The above-noted application is accepted as a filing for acknowledgement. (original signed by) Neil Jamieson Commission Member Attachment 1 Order U2004-192: FortisAlberta 2004 Municipal Assessment Rider A-1, Application 1341303-1, File 8600- A06, June 18, 2004. Appendix 1 Alberta Utilities Commission Page 1 of 3 April 24, 2015 Disposition 20373-D01-2015 FortisAlberta Inc. 2015 Municipal Assessment Rider A-1 Application 2015 Rate Sheets RIDER A-1 MUNICIPAL ASSESSMENT RIDER Effective: July 1, 2015 Availability The percentages below apply to the base Distribution Tariff charges at each Point of Service, according to the taxation authority in which the Point of Service is located. Rates 21, 23, 24, 26, 29, 38, and 65 are exempt from Rider A-1. Rider A-1 Number Name Rider Number Name Rider 03-0002 Acme, Village Of 2.12% 04-0414 Burnstick Lake, S.V. 0.41% 01-0003 Airdrie, City Of 0.76% 01-0046 Calgary, City Of (0.24%) 03-0004 Alberta Beach, S.V. Of 1.41% 02-0047 Calmar, Town Of 1.15% 25-0466 Alexander First Nation 1.61% 06-0049 Camrose County 0.86% 25-0467 Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation1.08% 01-0048 Camrose, City Of 0.65% 03-0005 Alix, Village Of 0.58% 02-0050 Canmore, Town Of 0.73% 03-0007 Amisk, Village Of 1.64% 06-0053 Cardston County 0.61% 04-0009 Argentia Beach, S.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Bylaw 2021-18 IDP Pigeon Lake North
    BYLAW 2021/18 BYLAW NO. 2021/18 is a Bylaw of the County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 in the Province of Alberta, for the purpose of adopting the Intermunicipal Development Plan (IDP) between the County of Wetaskiwin No. 10, the Summer Village of Argentia Beach, the Summer Village of Golden Days, and the Summer Village of Silver Beach (“the municipalities”) in the Province of Alberta. WHEREAS: The municipalities share common boundaries; AND WHEREAS: The municipalities share common interests and a desire to work together to provide services to their residents; AND WHEREAS: Pursuant to Section 631 of the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, Chapter M-26, as amended, an Intermunicipal Development Plan must be adopted by municipalities that have common boundaries. NOW THEREFORE: The Council of the County of Wetaskiwin No. 10, in the Province of Alberta, duly assembled, hereby enacts as follows: 1. That the Intermunicipal Development Plan (IDP) between the County of Wetaskiwin No. 10, the Summer Village of Argentia Beach, the Summer Village of Golden Days, and the Summer Village of Silver Beach, as attached and forming part of this Bylaw, be adopted. 2. This Bylaw shall come into full force and effect upon passing of the third reading and the corresponding passing of matching bylaws by the other municipalities. READ: A First time this 2nd day of March, 2021 READ: A Second time this 6th day of April, 2021 READ: A Third time and finally passed this 6th day of April, 2021 Previously Signed REEVE Previously Signed CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER PIGEON LAKE NORTH Intermunicipal Development Plan March 2021 1 This page is left intentionally blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The County of Wetaskiwin and the Summer Villages of Argentia Beach, Golden Days, and Silver Beach respectfully acknowledge that the Pigeon Lake North Intermunicipal Development Plan addresses lands that are a part of Treaty 6 territory - traditional lands of First Nations and Métis people - whose footsteps have marked these lands and shores for generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pigeon Lake South IDP Engagement Session Poster Boards
    WELCOME HELLO! Thank you for coming to the Engagement Session for the Pigeon Lake South We recognize that your time is Intermunicipal Development Plan with the following municipalities: important and we appreciate you coming today to learn about the IDP County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Summer Village of Norris Beach project and the contents of the draft Summer Village of Crystal Springs Summer Village of Poplar Bay IDP. Summer Village of Grandview PROJECT TIMELINE PUBLIC RESEARCH & PREPARE ENGAGEMENT & FINALIZE REVIEW DRAFT IDP REVISE IDP IDP 1 2 3 4 WE ARE HERE Fall 2019 Winter/Spring 2020 Summer/Fall 2020 Fall 2020 Prepare Background Committee Meetings Public Notification Finalize IDP Data Prepare Draft IDP Engagement Sessions Bylaw First Reading Meetings with Public Notification Revise IDP Public Hearing Administrations HOW TO GET INVOLVED Online Public Engagement Contact Us Please visit your municipality’s website to view the If you have any questions or comments, please contact engagement materials and provide feedback. Municipal Planning Services. The following will be available: [email protected] • A video recording of the presentation • Poster boards 780.486.1991 • Feedback Form for you to send any comments and questions you have to Municipal Planning Services #206, 17511 - 107 Ave Edmonton, AB T5S 1E5 WHAT IS AN IDP? An Intermunicipal Development Plan (IDP) is a high level policy Two IDPs are being prepared plan prepared by two or more neighbouring municipalities. concurrently by the County of the Wetaskiwin and the Pigeon Lake The twelve municipalities around Pigeon Lake have a long history Summer Villages that share a of working together.
    [Show full text]
  • PIGEON LAKE, ALBERTA …A Brief History
    PIGEON LAKE, ALBERTA …a brief history Pigeon Lake is one of the largest and most extensively used recreational waters in Alberta. The lake covers an area of 96.7 km2 (37.3 sq. mi), and has a maximum depth of 9.1 m (30 ft.) It is an early tributary of the Battle River, connected through the Pigeon Lake Creek with no large water inflows. It is served by hundreds of fresh water streams and artesian wells, with levels highly dependent on snow and rain conditions. The water freezes over in November of each year and over the past half century has thawed to open water as early as April 16 in 2016 and as late as May 28th in 2013. Historical records detail a large artesian well on the northeast corner of the lake used for fresh drinking water by Nakoda tribes and the Algonquin Cree who travelled the region as early as 1725. Anthony Henday, one of the first of the British explorers, travelled the area as an emissary for the Hudson Bay Company in 1754 when the lake was called “hmi-hmoo” by the Cree Indians. The name in English meant "Woodpecker Lake." In 1858 the name was changed to Pigeon Lake in recognition of Passenger Pigeons, considered one of the prettiest doves in the world. They were said to have numbered in the millions and unfortunately were hunted to extinction. In the mid-19th century Pigeon Lake became a gathering place for First Nations people from numerous tribes and therefore a desirable spot for the location of both a Hudson Bay Company Trading Post and a Christian Mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Bylaw Number 2020/18
    BYLAW NUMBER 2020/18 BYLAW NO. 2020/18 is a bylaw of the County of Wetaskiwin No. 10, in the Province of Alberta, for the purpose of adopting the Intermunicipal Collaboration Framework (“ICF”) between the County of Wetaskiwin No.10, the Summer Village of Grandview, the Summer Village of Norris Beach, the Summer Village of Crystal Springs, and the Summer Village of Poplar Bay (the “Municipalities”) all in the Province of Alberta. WHEREAS The County of Wetaskiwin No.10, the Summer Village of Grandview, the Summer Village of Norris Beach, the Summer Village of Crystal Springs, and the Summer Village of Poplar Bay have common boundaries; and, AND WHEREAS The Municipalities share an interest to provide services in an efficient and collaborative manner, and, AND WHEREAS Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. 2000, Chapter M-26, as amended, a municipality must establish an ICF with other municipalities which share common boundaries; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the County of Wetaskiwin No. 10, duly assembled, hereby enacts as follows: PART 1 – TITLE AND DEFINITIONS 1.1 This bylaw shall be known as the “South Pigeon Lake Intermunicipal Collaboration Framework.” 1.2 Wherever the singular or masculine is used throughout this bylaw, the same shall be construed to mean the plural or feminine respectively where applicable. 1.3 Definitions for the purposes of this bylaw include: (1) “Act” means the Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. 2000, Chapter M-26 as amended; (2) “Terms of Reference” means the terms of reference
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Municipal Codes
    2017 Municipal Codes Updated December 22, 2017 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2017 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS CHANGES: 0315 - The Village of Thorsby became the Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017). NAME CHANGES: 0315- The Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017) from Village of Thorsby. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: DISSOLVED: 0038 –The Village of Botha dissolved and became part of the County of Stettler (effective September 1, 2017). 0352 –The Village of Willingdon dissolved and became part of the County of Two Hills (effective September 1, 2017). CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0522 Metis Settlements General Council 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (5) 20 Services Commissions (71) 06 Municipal Districts (64) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (108) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (87) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (5) 08 Special Areas (3) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) December 22, 2017 Page 1 of 13 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Wastewater Collection System
    SOUTH PIGEON LAKE REGIONAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM THE NEW REGIONAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM represents a notable step forward in municipal infrastructure for the residents and municipalities on the south side of The system, designed to meet the wastewater Pigeon Lake. collection needs of all si[ communities for the ne[t years and beyond, offers seYeral Participating south-side municipalities are adYantages including: working together, through the South Side Wastewater Committee, to design and construct reduced need for wastewater trucking, a system that: better protection of human health through makes use of the e[isting residential improYed wastewater management, wastewater system where possible, upgrading only where necessary, reduced nutrients added to our lake, makes use of the e[panded 0ulhurst wastewater serYice approaching an urban Lagoon, standard, offers a dependable, consistent leYel of long-term sustainability of our serYice through all our communities, communities, and will keep construction and operating costs a positiYe impact on our property Yalues. as low as possible, and has proYen to be reliable in other municipalities. C5<ST$L SP5,1*S 1255,S %($C+ 0$-0(-2 %($C+ P2PL$5 %$< *5$1'9,(W C281T< 2) W(T$S.,W,1 VYRI¿FHSOFRP FRXQW\ZHWDVNLZLQDEFD THE NEW SYSTEM — AFFORDABLE, DEPENDABLE, DOABLE Considerable progress has been made in the design and construction of the wastewater collection system that serYes the south-side communities of Pigeon Lake. The Working Committee retained 0P( The oYerall proMect consists of the following (ngineering Ltd. to complete preliminary design components: and cost estimates for the municipal collection system. This information forms the foundation of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND USE BYLAW WATERSHED REGULATIONS a Discussion Guide for Pigeon Lake Municipalities
    LAND USE BYLAW WATERSHED REGULATIONS A Discussion Guide for Pigeon Lake Municipalities Prepared By: Municipal Planning Services Prepared For: Pigeon Lake Watershed Management Plan (PLWMP) Steering Committee Draft Date: August 2020 P a g e 1 This page is left intentionally blank TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I OPPORTUNITIES 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 IMPLEMENTATION 3: CLEAN RUNOFF PRACTICES 12 PLWMP STEERING COMMITTEE 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 12 MUNICIPALITIES 1 MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY 12 PIGEON LAKE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION (PLWA) 1 CURRENT LAND USE BYLAW REGULATIONS 13 CONSULTING SERVICES 1 OPPORTUNITIES 14 ABOUT PIGEON LAKE 2 IMPLEMENTATION 4: GROUNDWATER QUALITY 15 GEOGRAPHY AND DEVELOPMENT HISTORY 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 15 PIGEON LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN 3 MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY 15 OTHER STUDIES AND REPORTS 3 CURRENT LAND USE BYLAW REGULATIONS 16 OPPORTUNITIES 17 PROJECT OVERVIEW 4 IMPLEMENTATION 5: SHORELINE AND RIPARIAN AREAS 18 PURPOSE & OBJECTIVES 4 Part 1: Discussion Guide - Complete 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS 18 Part 2: Engagement – To be rescheduled due to COVID-19 4 MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY 18 Part 3: Implementation Guides – MPS to prepare and present to Councils CURRENT LAND USE BYLAW REGULATIONS 19 following Engagement 4 OPPORTUNITIES 20 LIMITATIONS & APPLICABILITY 4 CURRENT REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT & SUCCESSES 4 SUMMARY 21 SIGNIFICANCE OF MUNICIPAL REGULATIONS AND BYLAWS 5 APPENDIX A: LIST OF LAND USE BYLAWS 22 METHODOLOGY 5 APPENDIX B: ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS 23 IMPLEMENTATION 1: LAND COVER AND BIODIVERSITY 6 ABBREVIATIONS 23 EXISTING CONDITIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Municipalities Assessed Using Camalot XXX = Not Using Camalot
    Municipalities Assessed Using CAMAlot XXX = not using CAMAlot CITIES Airdrie Cold Lake Leduc Red Deer Brooks Edmonton Lethbridge Spruce Grove Calgary Fort Saskatchewan Lloydminster St. Albert Camrose Grande Prairie Medicine Hat Wetaskiwin Chestermere Lacombe 15 of 18 SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY Crowsnest Pass Strathcona County Mackenzie County Wood Buffalo (only Ind) Jasper 5 of 5 MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS Acadia, M.D. of Foothills, M.D. of Northern Sunrise County Starland County Athabasca County Forty Mile, County of Opportunity, M.D. of Stettler, County of Barrhead, County of Grande Prairie, County of Paintearth, County of Sturgeon County Beaver County Greenview, M.D. of Parkland County Taber, M.D. of Big Lakes, M.D. of Kneehill County Peace, M.D. of Thorhild, County of Bighorn, M.D. of Lac La Biche County Pincher Creek, M.D. of Two Hills, County of Birch Hills County Lac Ste. Anne County Ponoka County Vermilion River, County of Bonnyville, M.D. of Lacombe County Provost, M.D. of Vulcan County Brazeau County Lamont County Ranchland, M.D. of Wainwright, M.D. of Camrose County Leduc County Red Deer County Warner, County of Cardston County Lesser Slave River, M.D. Rocky View County Westlock County Clear Hills County Lethbridge, County of Saddle Hills County Wetaskiwin, County of Clearwater County Minburn, County of Smoky Lake County Wheatland County Cypress County Mountain View County Smoky River, M.D. of Willow Creek, M.D. of Fairview, M.D. of Newell, County of Spirit River, M.D. of Woodlands County Flagstaff County Northern Lights, County of
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Municipal Affairs Population List
    2012 Municipal Affairs Population List Population figures are as of September 1, 2012 in compliance with the Determination of Population Regulation 63/2001 under Section 604 of the Municipal Government Act. Unofficial population figures refer to First Nations population on-reserve as of December 2011. Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: (780) 427-2225 Fax: (780) 420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] Website Version: ISBN 978-1-4601-0645-7 ALBERTA MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS 2012 POPULATION LIST 2012 MUNICIPAL FEDERAL MUNICIPALITY POPULATION CENSUS DATE CENSUS DATE CITIES (17) Airdrie 45,711 1-Apr-12 Brooks 13,676 10-May-11 Calgary 1,120,225 1-Apr-12 Camrose 17,286 10-May-11 Cold Lake 14,400 15-Apr-12 Edmonton 817,498 1-Apr-12 Fort Saskatchewan 20,475 30-Apr-12 Grande Prairie 55,032 10-May-11 Lacombe 11,707 10-May-11 Leduc 25,482 30-Apr-12 Lethbridge 89,074 1-Apr-12 Lloydminster – Alberta side only 18,032 10-May-11 (see p. 10 for additional information) Medicine Hat 61,180 1-Jun-12 Red Deer 91,877 1-Apr-11 Spruce Grove 26,171 10-May-11 St. Albert 61,466 10-May-11 Wetaskiwin 12,525 10-May-11 Cities Total 2,501,817 SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITIES (5) Municipality of Crowsnest Pass 5,565 10-May-11 Municipality of Jasper 5,236 30-Jun-11 (see p. 10 for shadow population using 2011 Municipal Census) Mackenzie County 10,927 10-May-11 Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo 116,407 9-May-12 (see p.
    [Show full text]