Overview Print Page Close Window
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Caracterizacion Socio Economica De La Raan
Fundación para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Agropecuario y Forestal de Nicaragua (FUNICA) Fundaci ón Ford Gobierno Regional de la RAAN Caracterización socioeconómica de la Región Autónoma del Atlántico Norte (RAAN) de Nicaragua ACERCANDO AL DESARROLLO Fundación para el Desarollo Tecnológico Agropecuario y Forestal de Nicaragua (FUNICA) Fundación Ford – Gobierno Regional Elaborado por: Suyapa Ortega Thomas Consultora Revisado por: Ing. Danilo Saavedra Gerente de Operaciones de FUNICA Julio de 2009 Caracterización Socioeconómica de la RAAN 2 Fundación para el Desarollo Tecnológico Agropecuario y Forestal de Nicaragua (FUNICA) Fundación Ford – Gobierno Regional Índice de contenido Presentacion ...................................................................................................................... 5 I. Perfil general de la RAAN .............................................................................................. 7 II. Entorno regional y demografía de la RAAN.................................................................... 8 III. Organización territorial ................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Avance del proceso de demarcación y titulación .................................................... 11 IV. Caracterización de la RAAN ....................................................................................... 13 4.1 Las características hidrográficas .......................................................................... 13 Lagunas....................................................................................................................... -
REPÚBLICA DE NICARAGUA 1 Biltignia ¤£ U Kukalaya K Wakaban a Sahsa Sumubila El Naranjal Lugar Karabila L A
000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 Lugar Paso W a s p á m Mina Columbus Cuarenta y Tres El Paraiso Wawabun UKALAYA awa Llano Krasa K La Piedra San Miguel W La Unión Tingni 0 487 0 0 Podriwas Mani Watla 0 0 ¤£ Empalme de 0 0 Grey Town La PAlmera 0 6 Sukat Pin 6 5 5 K 451 Santa Rosa 1 REPÚBLICA DE NICARAGUA 1 Biltignia ¤£ U Kukalaya K Wakaban A Sahsa Sumubila El Naranjal Lugar Karabila L A Y MINISTERIOP laDnta EEl Sa ltoTRANSPORTE E INFRAESTRUCTURA A Leimus Dakban Risco de Oro Yulu Dakban DIEVlefaIntSe BIlaÓncoN GENERAL DE PLANIFICACIÓN Lawa Place Î La Panama Risco de Oro Kukalaya Cerro Krau Krau BONANZA B o n a n z a MAPA MUNRíIo CSucIioPAPLlan GDrandEe PRINZAPOLKA ¤£423 Rio Kukalaya W a w 414 (Amaka) Las Breñas a s ¤£ i 0 0 0 0 0 P Santa Clara 0 0 REs D VIAL INVENTARIADA POR TIPO DE SUPERFICIE 0 i P loma La 5 5 5 Murcielago Esmeralda La Potranca (Rio Sukat Pin 5 1 Industria 1 Ojochal Mukuswas Minesota Susun Arriba Kuliwas 410 Maderera o El Naranjal ¤£ A Sirpi) Y Wasminona La Luna A Españolina L A Klingna El Doce Lugar La K Susun U Potranca K El Cacao Los Placeres ¤£397 Kuliwas P u e rr tt o Klingna Landing El Corozo Empalme de C a b e z a s Wasminona ROSITA Î Karata Wihilwas El Cocal Cerro Liwatakan 0 Muelle 0 0 Bambanita 0 0 0 O 0 Cañuela Comunal 0 k 4 Buena Vista o 4 n 5 Kalmata Rio Bambana w 5 1 a 1 s Fruta de Pan La Cuesta Bambana Lugar Kalmata San Pablo de Alen B am R o s ii tt a KUKA Lapan b L a A n Y Î Omizuwas a A El Salto Lugar Betania Muelle Comunal Sulivan Wasa King Wawa Bar Cerro Wingku Waspuk Pruka 0 Lugar Kawibila 0 0 0 0 Cerro Wistiting 0 0 El Dos 0 3 San Antonio 3 5 de Banacruz 5 1 Banacruz 1 K UK A L Rio Banacruz A UKALA Y K YA Las Delicias A Banasuna Cerro Las El Sombrero Américas Pauta Bran L a El Carao y La Florida a s i Talavera k B s a Ulí am F. -
Organization of American States Electoral Observation Mission Municipal Elections Nicaragua
ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES ELECTORAL OBSERVATION MISSION MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS NICARAGUA November 5, 2017 FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FINAL REPORT TO THE PERMANENT COUNCIL ...............................................................................1 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 1 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 3. PRE-ELECTORAL STAGE .................................................................................................................... 2 4. ELECTION DAY .................................................................................................................................. 4 5. POST-ELECTORAL STAGE .................................................................................................................. 6 6. RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 7 6.1. Electoral Organization and Technology ................................................................................. 7 6.2. Voter Registry ......................................................................................................................... 9 6.3. The Electoral Branch ............................................................................................................ 11 6.4. Election dispute resolution -
FICHA MUNICIPAL Nombre Del Municipio PUERTO CABEZAS
FICHA MUNICIPAL Nombre del Municipio PUERTO CABEZAS Región Región Autónoma del Atlántico Norte (RAAN) Cabecera municipal Bilwi Al Norte con el Municipio de Waspam. Al Sur con el Municipio de Prinzapolka. Límites Al Este con el Mar Caribe (Océano Atlántico). Al Oeste con los Municipios de Rosita y Waspam. Entre las cooordenadas 14° 01' latitud norte y 83° 23' Posición geográfica longitud oeste. Distancia a Managua 536 Kms Superficie 5,984.81 Kms² (INETER, 2000) Altitud 10 msnm (INETER, 2000) Población total 51,993 Inec. 2000 56.79% Poblacion Urbana. % Urbano / Rural 43.21% Poblacion Rural. Indice de Necesidades : Pobreza extrema: 59.7%. Brecha de pobreza Básicas Insatisfechas Pobres: 25.5%. No pobres: 14.8%. I. RESEÑA HISTÓRICA En abril de 1,905, los gobiernos de Nicaragua e Inglaterra suscribieron el Tratado Harrison-Altamirano, cuya esencia es el reconocimiento por parte de Inglaterra de la soberanía de Nicaragua sobre el territorio de la Reserva Mosquitia, y el compromiso del Estado nicaragüense a una serie de concesiones que ofrecieran una garantía de sobrevivencia para los pobladores de ella. Estas garantías eran, entre otras, la exención del servicio militar por un período determinado, concesión de tierras y otras. En 1921, la Bragman's Bluff Lumber Company suscribió un contrato con la comunidad de Karatá, donde le concedía 80,000 acres de tierra para la explotación de pinos. Como efecto de las actividades e infraestructuras creada por la compañía, muchas comunidades indígenas actuales, surgieron como tal. Posteriormente, la comunidad de Lamlaya se convirtió en una puerta para la entrada y salida de la explotación de riquezas desde el interior de la Región hacia PUERTO CABEZAS. -
Estrategias De Desarrollo Para Un Modelo De Atención En Salud Comunitario, Barrio El Cocal, Bilwi, 2000
Universidad Nacional Autónoma De Nicaragua Centro De Investigación Y Educación En Salud Escuela De Salud Pública Universidad De Las Regiones Autónomas De La Costa Caribe Nicaragüense I ¡631. vz 1r too! Maestría de Salud Pública lntercultural 1998 -2000 Tesis para obtener el titulo de Master en Salud Pública lntercultural: Estrategias de Desarrollo para un Modelo de Atención en Salud Comunitario, Barrio El Cocal, Bilwi, 2000 Autores: Geert Jan van Heck Eduardo José Torres Pérez Bilwi, Mayo 2001 Vt,.~~~~: A~; A~J.tdlt:4; P~~dtoi; ~tfu.; ~~to~~; ~~lo~~· pl/),O k. ~ ~ ~ ~4'4~4t~,4M~4t ~, tok.,~~~: Dedicatoria ~~~,~MIA~~k N~,~~~Ái.M,~,~~~~ El~ . ~~~-1t~~~M~J.t~ ~~,J.t.~~~Á~~ ~~,~M. O¡J¿.~lllÚ~~~~,~~~~ ~JJ,,tJM~~~~kN~. Agradecimiento (}.~~~~,~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ : •A IM-, IM ~~u~~~ -u.~, ~t~ •A~IM~~~~IA~l.l.IA ~ •A ~ ~ Jd t~ J.t H~ 1~ 'I ~~,~~J.tH~Jooo~ ~IA~l.l.~IAH~l.l.SJM P~t~,~~~~~ •A~~H~G~to1-~~~, ~d~ • Al ~ PtAo R~ 'I /¿.. ~ A~ P~ ~ J}41~~~,~~v~~ •A~ IM ~ 'I ~ fo1- ~ ¿,,, ~~~11.w~¿t.~Uú,~ Resumen El objetivo general de la investigación es: identificar los factores que determinan la eficacia de las principales estrategias de desarrollo de un modelo de atención en salud comunitario en el barrio El Cocal, Bilwi, 2000. El estudio es de corte transversal, participativo y para la acción, utilizando métodos y técnicas cuantitativas y cualitativas. El barrio Coca! existe como comunidad miskita desde antes de la creación de la ciudad de "Puerto Cabezas" en febrero de 1929. La nueva localidad incluyó a la población indígena de Bilwi. El barrio cuenta con 2449 habitantes, la gran mayoría (89%) de la etnia miskita, seguido por la etnia mestiza y la etnia criolla. -
Download It From
IMD Partner in Democracy A NNUAL R EPORT 2005 The IMD – an institute of political parties for political parties The Institute for Multiparty Democracy (IMD) is an institute of political parties for political parties. Its mandate is to encourage the process of democratisation in young democracies by providing support to political parties as the core pillars of multi- party democracy. IMD works in a strictly non-partisan and inclusive manner. Through this approach, the Institute endeavours to contribute to properly functioning, sustainable pluralistic political party systems. It also supports the activities of civil society groups which play a healthy role in multi-party democracies, even though they are not part of any formal party structure. IMD was set up by seven Dutch political parties in 2000 in response to requests for support from around the world. The IMD’s founding members are the Dutch Labour Party (PvdA), Liberal Party (VVD), Christian Democratic Party (CDA), Democratic Party (D66), Green Party (GroenLinks), Christian Union (ChristenUnie) and Reformed Party (SGP). Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy Korte Vijverberg 2 2513 AB The Hague The Netherlands Address per September 1, 2006: Passage 31 2511 AB The Hague The Netherlands T: +31 (0)70 311 5464 F: +31 (0)70 311 5465 E: [email protected] www.nimd.org IMD Partner in Democracy A NNUAL R EPORT 2005 Partners in Democracy Preface Without properly functioning political parties, resulted in a study for the European Parliament entitled democracies do not work well – a fact that is not yet No lasting Peace and Prosperity without Democracy & fully recognised within the international development Human Rights. -
Sandinistas Dominate Local Elections in Nicaragua Benjamin Witte-Lebhar
University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiCen Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 11-30-2017 Sandinistas Dominate Local Elections in Nicaragua Benjamin Witte-Lebhar Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen Recommended Citation Witte-Lebhar, Benjamin. "Sandinistas Dominate Local Elections in Nicaragua." (2017). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen/ 10481 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiCen by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 80464 ISSN: 1089-1560 Sandinistas Dominate Local Elections in Nicaragua by Benjamin Witte-Lebhar Category/Department: Nicaragua Published: 2017-11-30 Nicaraguan leader Daniel Ortega and the governing Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional (FSLN) added to their more than decade-long winning streak with a near-sweep in nationwide municipal elections. The contests––held Nov. 5 and tepidly approved by observers from the Organization of American States (OAS)––tightened the Ortega regime’s already meaty grip on the country (NotiCen, Feb. 16, 2017, June 29, 2017, and Oct. 19, 2017) but also prompted a handful of confrontations that left several people dead. Overall, the Sandinistas won 135 of the nation’s 153 municipalities, including all 15 departmental capitals plus Bilwi (Puerto Cabezas) and Bluefields, the main cities in the Región Autónoma de la Costa Caribe Norte (North Caribbean Coast Autonomous Region, RACCN) and the Región Autónoma de la Costa Caribe Sur, (South Caribbean Coast Autonomous Region, RACCS) respectively, according to the Consejo Supremo Electoral (CSE), Nicaragua’s electoral authority. -
Nicaragua: United States Assistance to the Nicaraguan Human Rights Association and the Nicaraguan Resistance
Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 1988 Nicaragua: United States Assistance to the Nicaraguan Human Rights Association and the Nicaraguan Resistance Suzanne B. Goldberg Columbia Law School, [email protected] Lee Crawford Kevin Reed John Tennant Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Suzanne B. Goldberg, Lee Crawford, Kevin Reed & John Tennant, Nicaragua: United States Assistance to the Nicaraguan Human Rights Association and the Nicaraguan Resistance, 1 HARV. HUM. RTS. YB. 260 (1988). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1109 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Human Rights Yearbook / Vol. 1 NICARAGUA: United States Assistance to the Nicaraguan Human Rights Association and the Nicaraguan Resistance The question of providing aid to the Nicaraguan Resistance has been significant to United States human rights policy throughout the Rea- gan Administration. Although events have changed repeatedly during the winter of 1988, including a truce between the Nicaraguan Gov- ernment and the Resistance and a Congressional decision not to provide military aid to the Resistance, the underlying policy issues remain constant. The Harvard Human Rights Yearbook presents two notes, infra, discussing the Military Construction Appropriations Act of 1987, which granted $100 million in aid to the Nicaraguan Resis- tance. The first note discusses the Nicaraguan Human Rights Asso- ciation (Asociacidn Nicaraguense Pro-Derechos Humanos "ANPDH"), a human rights organization sponsored and funded by the United States. -
The Right of Indigenous Peoples to Political Participation and the Case of Yatama V
THE RIGHT OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES TO POLITICAL PARTICIPATION AND THE CASE OF YATAMA V. NICARAGUA Maia Sophia Campbell* “[T]he right of self-determination may be satisfied where a people enjoys an effective voice, through its own representatives, in the governing of a democratic State, and suffers no disadvantage or discrimination.”1 I. INTRODUCTION Violence and protests erupted on the streets of Puerto Cabezas after Nicaragua denied a major indigenous political party, YATAMA, participation in the November 2000 municipal elections.2 Due to the exclusion of the YATAMA party, between 85% and 95% of voters in the region abstained from voting in the elections; in some areas less than ten votes were cast.3 Failing to reach any redress in Nicaraguan domestic courts, the YATAMA party sought relief from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The ruling of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of YATAMA v. Nicaragua is a landmark legal precedent for guaranteeing indigenous peoples the right to political participation. The case marks the first time an international tribunal has found that a state violated political rights and equal * J.D., University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law, 2007; B.A., Pomona College, 2001. Thank you to Jim Anaya for his valuable comments on earlier drafts of this Note, and to the editors at the Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law for their helpful editing assistance. 1. U.N. Econ. & Soc. Council [ECOSOC], Sub-Comm’n on Prevention of Discrimination & Prot. of Minorities, Working Group on Indigenous Populations, Working Paper: Standard-Setting Activities: Evolution of Standards Concerning the Rights of Indigenous People, ¶ 19, U.N. -
Bio-CLIMA: Integrated Climate Action to Reduce Deforestation and Strengthen Resilience in BOSAWÁS and Rio San Juan Biospheres
FP146: Bio-CLIMA: Integrated climate action to reduce deforestation and strengthen resilience in BOSAWÁS and Rio San Juan Biospheres Nicaragua | CABEI | B.27/02 19 November 2020 Bio-CLIMA Nicaragua “Integrated climate action for reduced deforestation and strengthened resilience and in the Bosawas and Rio San Juan Biosphere Reserves” Annex 8a: Gender Assessment and Gender Action Plan September 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. 4 I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Project Introduction from an Intercultural Gender Perspective .................................................. 5 1.2 Objective and Rationale of the Gender Assessment .......................................................................... 6 II. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 7 III. Brief Historical Overview from a Gender Perspective of the Nicaraguan Caribbean Region since Independence ............................................................................................................................................... 8 IV. Constitutional, Legal and Institutional Framework of Gender Equality and Autonomy in Nicaragua and the Caribbean Coast Regions .............................................................................................................. -
Nicaragua's Failed Revolution
NICARAGUA’S FAILED REVOLUTION THE INDIGENOUS STRUGGLE FOR SANEAMIENTO NICARAGUA’S FAILED REVOLUTION THE INDIGENOUS STRUGGLE FOR SANEAMIENTO Acknowledgements This report is dedicated to the courageous struggle of the Indigenous and Afro-descendent communities for Saneamiento in Nicaragua. The report was authored by Anuradha Mittal with contribution from Josh Mayer, research assistance by Elizabeth Fraser, Elena Teare, Naomi Maisel, Andy Currier, and Janhavi Mittal, and editorial assistance from Frederic Mousseau. Forests of the World provided the map on Current Land Use, Indigenous/Afro-descendent Territories and Protected Areas. Field research was conducted by Anuradha Mittal, with assistance from several individuals, who are not named so their long- term commitment to this work is not threatened. We are deeply grateful for their support. Names and details that could reveal the identity of those interviewed have been withheld to ensure their safety. The fear of invasions, killings, and kidnappings, that is silencing the Indigenous communities in Nicaragua, makes this report all the more urgent. We are deeply grateful to the many individual and foundation donors who make our work possible. Thank you. Views and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Oakland Institute alone and do not reflect opinions of the individuals and organizations that have sponsored and supported the work. Design: Amymade Graphic Design, amymade.com Cover Photo: Miskitu villagers on the banks of Rio Coco. November 2018 All photos © The Oakland Institute Publisher: The Oakland Institute is an independent policy think tank bringing fresh ideas and bold action to the most pressing social, economic, and environmental issues. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). -
20210422 Onepager Resultados Nicaragua
RESULTS FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NICARAGUA PLAN OF ACTION Hurricanes Eta and Iota As of 5 INFORMApril 2021 RISK Implementation of the Plan of Action developed by United Nations agencies in coordination with the Government of Nicaragua through the National System for Disaster Prevention, Mitigation and Response (SINAPRED). $50.9M REQUIRED FUNDING $23.3M 54.2% FUNDING RECEIVED FUNDING GAP FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS PER SECTOR 7.8% 9.6% 32.6% $50.9M 11.7% TOTAL FUNDING REQUIRED Karatá, Nicaragua 16.7% 21.4% Photo: WFP Nicaragua SECTORS WITH ONGOING ACTIVITIES IN DEPARTMENTS AND MUNICIPALITIES HONDURAS TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED AND MOBILIZED BY SECTOR Affected Municipalities Funds required (US$) Funds received (US$) El Cua, Pantasma, San José Affected Municipalities de Bocay, San Rafael del Norte, Dipilto, Jalapa, Murra, Wiwilí de Jinotega Quilalí, Santa María, Affected Municipalities 2.4 M Wiwili de Nueva Segovia Bonanza, Mulukuku, Paiwas, Prinzapolka, Puerto Cabezas, JINOTEGA Rosita, Siuna, Waslala, Waspam Early Recovery 16.6 M NUEVA SEGOVIA NORTH CARIBBEAN COAST MADRIZ AUTONOMOUS REGION (RACCN) Caribbean Water, Sanitation 5.5 M 10.9 M Affected Municipalities Sea and Hygiene Totogalpa MATAGALPA SOUTH CARIBBEAN COAST AUTONOMOUS REGION Food Security 8.5 M 8.5 M (RACCS) Affected Municipalities Affected Municipalities Bluefields Health and 4.8 M La Dalia, Rancho Grande, Nutrition 6.0 M MANAGUA Pacific MASAYAWaslala Ocean 1.5 M GRANADA Protection 4.9 M RIVAS 0.6 M Affected Municipalities Tola Education 4.0 M COSTA RICA The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.