The Museum of Modern Art for Immediate Release

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

The Museum of Modern Art For Immediate Release May 1986 REINSTALLATION OF DRAWINGS AND PRINTS GALLERIES AT THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART Currently on view at The Museum of Modern Art are two installations whose content is drawn from the Museum's permanent collection. SCULPTORS' DRAWINGS, organized by Beatrice Kernan, assistant curator in the Department of Drawings, provides a graphic index to many major transformations in twentieth-century sculpture. NAKED/NUDE, organized by Audrey Isselbacher, assistant curator in the Department of Prints and Illustrated Books, is a historical survey by late nineteenth-and twentieth-century modern masters focusing on the nude as subject. SCULPTORS' DRAWINGS remains on view through August, and NAKED/NUDE continues through September 1986. A survey of approximately 100 works on paper, SCULPTORS' DRAWINGS examines drawing, watercolor, and collage as exploratory mediums that anticipate and parallel sculptural innovation. The exhibition represents the work of over forty sculptors, including Alexander Archipenko, Constantin Brancusi, Christo, Alberto Giacometti, Eva Hesse, Amedeo Modigliani, Henry Moore, Claes Oldenburg, David Smith, Robert Smithson, and William Tucker. Included in NAKED/NUDE are works by such artists as Salvador Da1i, Otto Dix, Jean Dubuffet, Paul Gauguin, Natalia Goncharova, Paul Klee, Yasuo Kuniyoshi, Henri Matisse, Edvard Munch, Pablo Picasso, and Oscar Schlemmer, revealing a widely varied body of work ranging from idealized renderings of the female nude to surreal distortions of anatomical form. In addition, beginning in July a selection of prints executed over the past twenty-five years, will continue the exploration of this classic theme as interpreted by Pop, Conceptual, and Neo-Expressionist artists. * * * no. 41 For further information, contact Jeanne Collins or Jessica Schwartz, Department of Public Informtion 212/708-9750 11 West 53 Street, New York, NY 10019-5486 Tel: 212-708-9400 Cable: MODERNART Telex: 62370 MOOART .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Futurist Moment : Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture
MARJORIE PERLOFF Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO AND LONDON FUTURIST Marjorie Perloff is professor of English and comparative literature at Stanford University. She is the author of many articles and books, including The Dance of the Intellect: Studies in the Poetry of the Pound Tradition and The Poetics of Indeterminacy: Rimbaud to Cage. Published with the assistance of the J. Paul Getty Trust Permission to quote from the following sources is gratefully acknowledged: Ezra Pound, Personae. Copyright 1926 by Ezra Pound. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Ezra Pound, Collected Early Poems. Copyright 1976 by the Trustees of the Ezra Pound Literary Property Trust. All rights reserved. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Ezra Pound, The Cantos of Ezra Pound. Copyright 1934, 1948, 1956 by Ezra Pound. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Blaise Cendrars, Selected Writings. Copyright 1962, 1966 by Walter Albert. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 1986 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 1986 Printed in the United States of America 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 54321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Perloff, Marjorie. The futurist moment. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Futurism. 2. Arts, Modern—20th century. I. Title. NX600.F8P46 1986 700'. 94 86-3147 ISBN 0-226-65731-0 For DAVID ANTIN CONTENTS List of Illustrations ix Abbreviations xiii Preface xvii 1.
[Show full text]
Russian Art 1
RUSSIAN ART 1 RUSSIAN ART Christie’s dominated the global market for Russian Works of Art and Fabergé in 2016, with our Russian Art sales achieving more than £12 million internationally. For the tenth consecutive season, our Russian Art auctions saw the highest sell-through rates in the market. With a focus on outstanding quality, Christie’s continues to attract both emerging and established collectors in the field. For over a decade, Christie’s has set world auction records in every Russian Art sale. We have broken a total of six records in the past two years, including two in excess of £4 million. Christie’s has set world records for over 50 of Russia’s foremost artists, including Goncharova, Repin, Levitan, Vereshchagin, Vasnetsov, Borovikovsky, Serov, Somov, Lentulov, Mashkov, Annenkov and Tchelitchew. Six of the 10 most valuable paintings ever purchased in a Russian Art sale were sold at Christie’s. Christie’s remains the global market leader in the field of Russian Works of Art and Fabergé, consistently achieving the highest percentage sold by both value and lot for Russian Works of Art. Christie’s closes 2016 with a 60% share of the global Fabergé market, and a 62% share of the global market for Russian Works of Art. cover PROPERTY FROM AN IMPORTANT EUROPEAN COLLECTION KONSTANTIN KOROVIN (1861–1939) Woodland brook, 1921 Estimate: £120,000–150,000 Sold for: £317,000 London, King Street · November 2016 back cover PROPERTY OF A MIDDLE EASTERN COLLECTOR A GEM-SET PARCEL-GILT SILVER-MOUNTED CERAMIC TOBACCO HUMIDOR The mounts marked K.
[Show full text]
Annual Report 1995
19 9 5 ANNUAL REPORT 1995 Annual Report Copyright © 1996, Board of Trustees, Photographic credits: Details illustrated at section openings: National Gallery of Art. All rights p. 16: photo courtesy of PaceWildenstein p. 5: Alexander Archipenko, Woman Combing Her reserved. Works of art in the National Gallery of Art's collec- Hair, 1915, Ailsa Mellon Bruce Fund, 1971.66.10 tions have been photographed by the department p. 7: Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo, Punchinello's This publication was produced by the of imaging and visual services. Other photographs Farewell to Venice, 1797/1804, Gift of Robert H. and Editors Office, National Gallery of Art, are by: Robert Shelley (pp. 12, 26, 27, 34, 37), Clarice Smith, 1979.76.4 Editor-in-chief, Frances P. Smyth Philip Charles (p. 30), Andrew Krieger (pp. 33, 59, p. 9: Jacques-Louis David, Napoleon in His Study, Editors, Tarn L. Curry, Julie Warnement 107), and William D. Wilson (p. 64). 1812, Samuel H. Kress Collection, 1961.9.15 Editorial assistance, Mariah Seagle Cover: Paul Cezanne, Boy in a Red Waistcoat (detail), p. 13: Giovanni Paolo Pannini, The Interior of the 1888-1890, Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mellon Pantheon, c. 1740, Samuel H. Kress Collection, Designed by Susan Lehmann, in Honor of the 50th Anniversary of the National 1939.1.24 Washington, DC Gallery of Art, 1995.47.5 p. 53: Jacob Jordaens, Design for a Wall Decoration (recto), 1640-1645, Ailsa Mellon Bruce Fund, Printed by Schneidereith & Sons, Title page: Jean Dubuffet, Le temps presse (Time Is 1875.13.1.a Baltimore, Maryland Running Out), 1950, The Stephen Hahn Family p.
[Show full text]
CUBISM and ABSTRACTION Background
015_Cubism_Abstraction.doc READINGS: CUBISM AND ABSTRACTION Background: Apollinaire, On Painting Apollinaire, Various Poems Background: Magdalena Dabrowski, "Kandinsky: Compositions" Kandinsky, Concerning the Spiritual in Art Background: Serial Music Background: Eugen Weber, CUBISM, Movements, Currents, Trends, p. 254. As part of the great campaign to break through to reality and express essentials, Paul Cezanne had developed a technique of painting in almost geometrical terms and concluded that the painter "must see in nature the cylinder, the sphere, the cone:" At the same time, the influence of African sculpture on a group of young painters and poets living in Montmartre - Picasso, Braque, Max Jacob, Apollinaire, Derain, and Andre Salmon - suggested the possibilities of simplification or schematization as a means of pointing out essential features at the expense of insignificant ones. Both Cezanne and the Africans indicated the possibility of abstracting certain qualities of the subject, using lines and planes for the purpose of emphasis. But if a subject could be analyzed into a series of significant features, it became possible (and this was the great discovery of Cubist painters) to leave the laws of perspective behind and rearrange these features in order to gain a fuller, more thorough, view of the subject. The painter could view the subject from all sides and attempt to present its various aspects all at the same time, just as they existed-simultaneously. We have here an attempt to capture yet another aspect of reality by fusing time and space in their representation as they are fused in life, but since the medium is still flat the Cubists introduced what they called a new dimension-movement.
[Show full text]
Cubo-Futurism
Notes Cubo-Futurism Slap in theFace of Public Taste 1 . These two paragraphs are a caustic attack on the Symbolist movement in general, a frequent target of the Futurists, and on two of its representatives in particular: Konstantin Bal'mont (1867-1943), a poetwho enjoyed enormouspopu larityin Russia during thefirst decade of this century, was subsequentlyforgo tten, and died as an emigrein Paris;Valerii Briusov(18 73-1924), poetand scholar,leader of the Symbolist movement, editor of the Salles and literary editor of Russum Thought, who after the Revolution joined the Communist party and worked at Narkompros. 2. Leonid Andreev (1871-1919), a writer of short stories and a playwright, started in a realistic vein following Chekhov and Gorkii; later he displayed an interest in metaphysicsand a leaning toward Symbolism. He is at his bestin a few stories written in a realistic manner; his Symbolist works are pretentious and unconvincing. The use of the plural here implies that, in the Futurists' eyes, Andreev is just one of the numerousepigones. 3. Several disparate poets and prose writers are randomly assembled here, which stresses the radical positionof the signatories ofthis manifesto, who reject indiscriminately aU the literaturewritt en before them. The useof the plural, as in the previous paragraphs, is demeaning. Maksim Gorkii (pseud. of Aleksei Pesh kov, 1�1936), Aleksandr Kuprin (1870-1938), and Ivan Bunin (1870-1953) are writers of realist orientation, although there are substantial differences in their philosophical outlook, realistic style, and literary value. Bunin was the first Rus sianwriter to wina NobelPrize, in 1933.AJeksandr Biok (1880-1921)is possiblythe best, and certainlythe most popular, Symbolist poet.
[Show full text]
EXHIBITION: 'Views from the Eastern Front: Russian Modernism and the Great War'
H-SHERA EXHIBITION: 'Views from the Eastern Front: Russian Modernism and the Great War' Discussion published by Galina Mardilovich on Saturday, November 10, 2018 Dear colleagues, I want to extend the invitation to the opening of the new exhibition,Views from the Eastern Front: Russian Modernism and the Great War, which will be held on Monday, 12 November, from 5 to 7pm at the Gallery in Amherst Center for Russian Culture. The opening reception honors the 100-year anniversary of the end of World War I. This exhibition presents works by Russian avant-garde artists and symbolist poets and explores the ways in which Russian modernists engaged with and reflected on themes of war, violence and destruction during World War I. Drawn from the permanent collections of the Mead Art Museum and the Amherst Center for Russian Culture, the exhibition features works by Mikhail Larionov, Aristarkh Lentulov, Natalia Goncharova, Zinaida Gippius, Olga Rozanova and Aleksei Kruchenykh, Vladimir Mayakovksy, Aleksandr Blok, and Pavel Filonov. Views from the Eastern Front: Russian Modernism and the Great War will be on view from 12 November through 17 February. with kind wishes, Galina Galina Mardilovich, PhD Acting Curator of Russian and European Art Mead Art Museum | Amherst College 41 Quadrangle Drive, Amherst MA 01002-5000 413.542.8561 | [email protected] amherst.edu/mead | Facebook • Twitter • Support Citation: Galina Mardilovich. EXHIBITION: 'Views from the Eastern Front: Russian Modernism and the Great War'. H-SHERA. 11-10-2018. https://networks.h-net.org/node/166842/discussions/3083866/exhibition-views-eastern-front-russian-modernism-and-great-war Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
[Show full text]
The Life of Russian Avant-Garde Works: an Essay in History
SVETLANA DZHAFAROVA The Life Of Russian Avant-Garde Works: An Essay In History Svetlana Dzhafarova is an art historian and since 1997 is scientific researcher with the Russian Institute for Cultural Research under the Ministry of Culture. She is an expert with the Moscow Malevich Foundation and works in the field of scientific analysis of new-found pieces of the Russian Avant-Garde. She is a published author. Under the aegis of the Russian Ministry of Culture, Svetlana Dzhafarova has organised and curated major international exhibitions since 1979; they are listed at the end of this article. In the 1990s, owing to the emergence on the art One literary and artistic manifesto was flagrantly called “A market of a substantial number of Russian avant- Slap in the Face of Public Taste”. All this led to hostilities in garde works (in the broad sense of the term), there arose the the press, which gives few indications as to whether anyone 19 vital question of their provenance. Given Russia’s turbulent wished to acquire such “socially inappropriate” paintings. twentieth-century history, the tortured destinies of people No doubt, this art had its own adherents, first and subjected to political and ideological repression, this theme foremost among relatives (for instance, the wives of Piotr appears in a dramatic, mysterious, and rather shadowy Konchatovsky, Ilya Mashkov and Aristarkh Lentulov who atmosphere for many reasons. were also constant models for their husbands) as well as It is no secret that the policy of persecution of dissenting colleagues and a close circle of theatre, musical and literary artists and their oeuvre, allegedly alien to proletarian ideology, figures.
[Show full text]
Natalia Goncharova's Canonization in Europe After 1945
Natalia Goncharova’s canonization in Europe after 1945 Elena Korowin Introduction The Russian avant-garde artist Natalia Sergeevna Goncharova (1881-1962) is considered to be one of the major female artists of the early twentieth century. Of all female artists internationally, her works are now among the most expensive; however, the canonization process of her work was quite sluggish. The aim of this paper is to trace the way Goncharova entered the canon of modern art in Europe. In doing so, it will show how differently the canonization processes of male and female as well as exile and non-exile artists from Russia developed in the twentieth century. Therefore, it is important to mark the milestones in Goncharova’s case of canonization: 1. The first acquisitions of her works by Musée National d’Art Moderne in 1950 and by the Tate in 1952. 2. Her recognition within the feminist context in the 1970s, which started with the exhibition Woman Artists 1550-1950. 3. Goncharova’s rising prices on the art market in the 2000s. To understand these three turns it is necessary to observe the cultural-political situation after 1945 in order to contextualize the reception of Russian avant-garde in the West and to answer the following questions: Why was Goncharova ‘discovered’ so late compared to other artists, particularly male artists of the Russian avant-garde; in other words, how does Goncharova’s canonization relate to the canonization of Malevich, Tatlin and especially of Mikhail Larionov? Who were the main actors in promoting her work? This analysis will provide a detailed understanding of the way early Russian art was promoted in Germany, France and England in the post-war period and how it became a part of the modernist canon in art history.
[Show full text]
ALEXANDER ARCHIPENKO: the PARISIAN YEARS, Will Be on View at the Museum of Modern
(^<f FOR RELEASE: The Museum of Modern Art Tuesday, July 21, 1970 '1 West 53 Street, New York, N.Y. 10019 Tel. 956-6100 Cable: Modernart PRESS PREVIEW: Monday, July 20, 1970 11 a. m. - 4 p. m. ALEXANDER ARCHIPENKO: THE PARISIAN YEARS, will be on view at The Museum of Modern Art from July 21 through October 18, 1970. The exhibition, composed of 33 works, surveys the late artist's sculpture, reliefs, drawings and prints done between 1908 and 1921, the years in which he lived in Paris. William S. Lieberman, Director of the Museum's Department of Painting and Sculpture, notes, "As a sculptor, Archipenko explored spatial relationships and the movement of forms. He was also particularly interested in the uses of color in sculpture. No matter how abstract his analysis, his inspiration derived from nature. Throughout his life, he remained a solitary figure. Although an innovator, he always remained close to the Cubist tradition as it was established in France during the years of his sojourn there." In 1908, when he was 21, Archipenko left his native Russia for France, where he remained until 1921 when he moved to Berlin. Two years later he settled in the United States. He died in New York in 1964. "By 1913," comments Mr. Lieberman, "Archipenko had found the direction of his personal style, and in the same year he exhibited in the famous Armory Show in New York. The significance of his work during his heroic years in France can be clearly revealed only by comparison with the contemporaneous and Cubist sculpture of Ra3nnond Duchamp-Villon, Henri Laurens, Jacques Lipchitz, and Pablo Picasso." The illustrated checklist* that accompanies the exhibition contains an essay by the critic, Katharine Kuh, who comments that as early as 1912, Archipenko combined wood, glass, mirror, metal, canvas, and wire to manipulate light and exploit (more) *ARCHIPENK0: THE PARISIAN YEARS.
[Show full text]
Modern Art Collection
MODERN ART COLLECTION Alexander Archipenko Reclining 1922 Bronze 17½ × 11 × 11¼ in. (44.5 × 27.9 × 28.6 cm) Bequest of Ruth P. Phillips 2005.23.5 Widely acknowledged as the first cubist sculptor, Alexander Archipenko held a lifelong fascination with the human figure in the round. Archipenko began studies at the School of Art in Kiev in 1902 but was forced to leave in 1905 after criticizing the academicism of his instructors. He lived briefly in Moscow before settling in 1909 in Paris, where he enrolled at the École des Beaux- Arts. Yet he left after just two weeks of formal studies, believing that he could teach himself through the direct study of sculpture in the Musée du Louvre. The decade following Archipenko’s arrival in Paris proved to be his most inventive. By 1910 Archipenko began exhibiting with the cubists at the Salon des Indépendants and the Salon d’Automne, earning international renown for his nearly abstract sculptures. He was represented in many international cubist exhibitions and also exhibited in the landmark Armory Show of 1913 in New York. Following his marriage in 1921 to Angelica Schmitz, a German sculptor, Archipenko moved to Berlin, where he opened an art school. They left Berlin for New York in 1923, and Archipenko became a United States citizen in 1929. As a young artist in Paris, Archipenko began to adapt cubist techniques to sculpture. Influenced by the cubist notion of integrating the figure with surrounding space, Archipenko interchanged solids and voids so that protruding elements seemed to recede and internal features to advance.
[Show full text]
New Cummer Exhibit Features Work of Modern Sculptor Alexander Archipenko
New Cummer exhibit features work of modern sculptor Alexander Archipenko By Charlie Patton Sat, Jan 30, 2016 @ 10:27 am | updated Sat, Jan 30, 2016 @ 10:43 am Back Photo: 1 of 2 Though he isn’t particularly well known in the United States, where he lived the last four decades of his life, many Europeans consider Alexander Archipenko a founding father of modern sculpture. “Archipenko is of the same importance for sculpture as Picasso is for painting,” the poet Yvan Coll said in 1921. “He began to explore the interplay between interlocking voids and solids and between convex and concave surfaces, forming a sculptural equivalent to Cubist paintings’ overlapping planes and, in the process, revolutionizing modern sculpture,” reads an entry in the Encyclopedia Britannica. Now museum visitors in Jacksonville can look at Archipenko’s work at the Cummer Museum Art & Gardens, where “Archipenko: A Modern Legacy” will be on view through April 17. Archipenko was born in the Ukraine in 1887 and moved to Paris in 1908. His early work was influenced by Cubism and in 1912 he joined the Section d’Or group, which included Pablo Picasso, Marcel Duchamp and Georges Braque. In 1913, he had four sculptures and five drawings in the controversial International Exhibition of Modern Art in New York, known as the Armory Show, which was the first large exhibition of modern art in America. Viewed today as America’s introduction to the future of art, at the time the show outraged many critics, including former President Theodore Roosevelt, who declared, “That’s not art.” While in Europe, Archipenko was influenced not only of the French modernists but also of the German expressionists and the Italian futurists.
[Show full text]
Dynamism, Creativeness, and Evolutionary Progress in the Work of Alexander Archipenko DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillm
Dynamism, Creativeness, and Evolutionary Progress in the work of Alexander Archipenko DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert D. Calhoun Graduate Program in History of Art The Ohio State University 2016 Dissertation Committee: Kris Paulsen, Advisor Myroslava Mudrak, Co-Advisor Lisa Florman Copyrighted by Robert D. Calhoun 2016 Abstract Guy Habasque, writing for L’Oeil in 1961, recognized Alexander Archipenko (1887-1964) as the leading revolutionary and guide for sculptors of the twentieth-century. At the same time, he acknowledges that history has failed to do the artist justice, forgetting and neglecting him even before his death in 1964. What Habasque wrote fifty- five years ago is doubly true today when the holdings of Archipenko’s work in public museums have been largely relegated to storage, along with many other significant works of the twentieth century, under the increasing pressure to create gallery space for contemporary works of art. To find space in permanent displays, modernist works must compete for significance, the power of which has apparently been lost in the few discussions that exist surrounding Archipenko’s work. This project draws attention to the neglected importance of Archipenko’s work. What is significant about this work is that it forms part of a counter history of early-twentieth century art as an alternative to the materialist-formalist history, which has held the dominant, discursive position. Archipenko’s biocentric, philosophical position presents an aesthetic that represents science and technology as organic, evolutionary extensions of a universal dynamism.
[Show full text]