JEFFREY BIRDSONG Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College

THE CHANGING OF THE GUARD: NEW LEADERSHIP IN THE POLITICAL CULTURE OF OKLAHOMA JEFFREY BIRDSONG Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College The Oklahoma political culture is set for a new era. Several political and demographic factors explain why the change is occurring, such as term limits, growing suburbanization, and increased newcomers in some rural legislative districts. As term limits decreases the importance ofseniority, the power structure in the legislature may be determined by the sheer number of representatives each area brings to the capitol. The effect of term limits and population shifts will cause the energies of the legislature to be focused more on the issues of concern for urban and suburban Oklahomans, often at the expense of their rural counterparts. These factors will affect primarily rural legislators, which, from statehood to the present, have disproportionately influenced Oklahoma politics. Rural roots in Oklahoma's political culture run deep. Agrarian ideals are reflected in the state's constitution, as economic regulations were initiated with the intent to preserve the family farm (Morgan and Morgan 1977). Such rural-centered beliefs created a prairie populism that prefers "decentralization and dispersion rather than concentration" (Holloway and Meyers 1992, p. 27). This political culture has been a device that the state's rural legislators have helped create and have 2 OKLAHOMA POLITICS I NOVEMBER 2002 used to their benefit. However, Oklahoma's political culture is changing because the political culture represented in the state legislature is changing. This paper describes how and why this change is occurring and what impact such change will mean to the Sooner state. Definitions of politics often refer to a division ofgoods and services or a determination of what is important for a society. Harold Lasswell's "who gets what, when and how" and David Easton's "the authoritative allocation of values" are two definitions of politics that fit such descriptions. Politics, however, works within the larger context of a society's culture that makes decision-making possible. The term "political culture" has been referred to as "a set of orientations toward a special set of social objects and process"(Almond and Verba 1989, p. 12). Countries will have their own political cultures, while regions and state governments within countries may also have cultural differences in their politics. This is the belief of one of the well-known scholars on variances in American political cultures, Daniel Elazar. For the state of Oklahoma, Elazar views the political culture as both traditionalistic and individualistic. According to Elazar, the traditionalistic aspects of Oklahoma political culture would make the state paternalistic and elitist with a minimal importance on parties. Elazar considers individualistic states to view politics as ''just another means by which individuals may improve themselves socially and economically" (1972, p. 94). Elazar's third type of political culture, moralistic, which finds politics to be the basis of mankind's search for the good society, was found to be a relatively obscure concept in Oklahoma. Elazar made his description on the political culture of Oklahoma thirty years ago when the state was dominated by one party, the Democratic party, and the state was heavily influenced by the rural areas. Increasingly, Oklahoma is a competitive state for both parties in all but local races and there is more influence from the urban/suburban communities. While the political culture may remain as Elazar described-what has been transforming is the institution that guides the political culture, the Oklahoma legislature. Throughout Oklahoma's history, despite the demographics that belie such influence, the rural areas have been most influential in the direction of the state's political culture. In rural Oklahoma, as this paper will argue, legislators have been able to campaign with a style that focuses primarily on personality and little on policy. This component ofthe political Birdsong I CHANGING OF THE GUARD 3 culture is starting to wane in the Sooner state. The result will be an influence on the political culture that will become more urban based and policy centered rather than rural based and personality centered. A greater emphasis on policy could create a moralistic political culture, which may cause the political parties to submit policy alternatives to the voters. Now that the state has been politically and demographically altered in new ways from its history, interest group activists, media figures, and local politicians coming from the urban and suburban areas will be the prominent figures that shape the political culture of Oklahoma. This power shift is actually several decades behind the population shift of the state. One ofthe most interesting phenomena of Oklahoma demographics is the location of its population. About 70 percent ofthe population lives in a diagonal corridor generally thirty miles wide extending from Miami in the northeast to Lawton in the southwest (Morgan, England, and Humphreys 1991). Roughly 10 percent of the state's population can be found northwest of this corridor, and the remaining twenty percent can be found in the southeast section. Oklahoma is a state with wide-open space, but a rather concentrated population. Increasingly more of the residents of the Sooner state make their homes in the two major urban areas, Oklahoma City and Tulsa, or in the suburbs of these two cities. The demographic alterations are just part of the changes occurring in Oklahoma that will affect the political culture of this state. In fact, the state has had a majority of its population reside in non-rural areas since the 1970s (Kirkpatrick, Morgan, and Kielhom 1977). The state's legislature, however, has continued to be inordinately controlled by rural legislators. In addition to demographics, evidence will be provided that other factors are now in place that will cause a significant transformation for the legislature and for the individuals who become legislators. These factors are new residents to the state moving in lake homes, primarily in the northeast and southeast regions, term limits, and the greater use of media in legislative campaigns. Simultaneously, the legislators and the legislature itself are changing. Legislators from traditional rural areas cannot campaign in the style that they are used to. Once term limits is in place, the urban legislators will gain in their influence over the institution. These changes impact the type of individuals who decide to run for office and also affect the 4 OKLAHOMA POLITICS I NOVEMBER 2002 issues of importance in the legislature. In greater fashion, political matters of Oklahoma will pit rural areas of the state against the suburban and urban areas. These issues, such as the continued legalization of cockfighting, will feature a conflict of the old customs (rural) against the modem (urban). Such conflicts will, in many ways, transcend the representation of parties and ideology. A study on the shifts of a state's political culture tells us not only why these shifts are taking place but also how it will shape future political battles. The structural alterations taking place in Oklahoma's political leadership will be significant compared to the historical patterns found throughout the state's existence. These changes will mark the third shift in the political structure. The political structure first was Democratic and rural dominated from statehood to 1960s and the second was two-party and rural/urban shared power from 1960s to present. In the years to come, the political culture will most likely be Republican majority and urban/suburban dominant. OKLAHOMA POLITICAL STRUCTURE (STATEHOOD TO 1963) State organizations of political parties in the United States respond to the localized needs of their public. This can cause state organizations of the same party to vary due to the differences in history and culture. As a result of its own unique history, Oklahoma has a political party structure that developed primarily on its own. The term "culture" implies a shared experience. Because no other state has the shared experience like Oklahoma's, this state could be in a category by itself in regards to the study of state politics. The political parties of Oklahoma developed independently ofthe national parties. Oklahoma historians James Scales and Danney Goble wrote of the isolation of both political parties that was evident during the pre-statehood days: Eastern Democrats, whose number was probably greater than that of the Republicans were systematically excluded from the patronage troughs. As a result, their party long lacked purpose, not to mention organization. On the other side, the territory's Republican party existed largely as a distribution center for federal appointments, its activities geared for winning not the voter's Birdsong I CHANGING OF THE GUARD 5 approval but the president's favor. For those reasons, both were isolated from the mainstream of the national party battle ( 1982, p. 6). This description also fits in nicely with Elazar's portrayal ofthe traditional political culture. As the parties developed with the statehood of Oklahoma, one party, the Democratic Party, was poised to dominate. The Oklahoma delegation for the constitutional convention included one hundred Democrats and only twelve Republicans. Added to the lopsided partisan design of the constitution, most Republican officials did not participate in the convention because of the "carpetbagger" image that plagued them from the patronage rule of the federal government in Oklahoma territory. The constitution that was created put the Democrats in a position of power for many years, as they garnered most political offices at the county level. The Democrats made sure that county governments formed during statehood would be the power base for the party for years to come (Morgan and Morgan 1977). While the Democrats may have been the dominant party, they were not a united party. As the Democrats had an overwhelming advantage in Oklahoma politics from the 1930s to the 1960s, the party found plenty to argue about within its own ranks.

Load more