DOCSLIB.ORG

NEC FUTURE TIER 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (203)762-1717 MADE SIMPLE AVAILABLE for PUBLIC COMMENT Mfg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEC FUTURE TIER 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (203)762-1717 MADE SIMPLE AVAILABLE for PUBLIC COMMENT Mfg Appendix FF Agency and Public Involvement 1. Tier 1 Draft EIS Distribution List 2. Notice of Availability 3. Sample Newspaper Notices 4. Station Poster 5. Other Correspondence 6. Comment Summary Report Appendix Part 1: A–D Appendix Part 2: E–K Appendix Part 3: L–P Appendix Part 4: Q–Z Tier 1 Final EIS Page | 1 Volume 1 (Preferred Alternative) Appendix FF – Agency and Public Involvement Tier 1 Draft EIS Distribution List Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 1 Appendix FF – Agency and Public Involvement (Federal Agencies) Federal Agencies Christopher VanWyk Michael Hines Manager Federal Transit Administration Planning and Environmental Division, Airport 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Rm. E45-334 Planning and Programming Washington, DC 20590 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Daniel Koenig Washington, DC 20591 Federal Transit Administration - Headquarters 1990 K St. NW, Suite 510 Michael Huerta Washington, DC 20006 Administrator Federal Aviation Administration Mary Beth Mello 800 Independence Avenue, SW Regional Administrator Washington, DC 20591 Federal Transit Administration - Region 1 Kendall Square William Reinhardt 55 Broadway, Suite 920 Office of Airport Planning and Programming, Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 National Planning and Environmental Division Federal Aviation Administration Marilyn G. Shazor 800 Independence Avenue, SW Regional Administrator Washington, DC 20591 Federal Transit Administration - Region 2 One Bowling Green, Rm. 429 Carmine Gallo New York, NY 10004-1415 Regional Administrator Federal Aviation Administration - Eastern Terry Garcia-Crews Region Regional Administrator 1 Aviation Plaza Federal Transit Administration - Region 3 Jamaica, NY 11434-4848 1760 Market St., Suite 500 Philadelphia, PA 19103-4124 Steven Kapsalis Federal Aviation Administration - Eastern Frank Keel Region Bureau of Indian Affairs, Eastern Region 1 Aviation Plaza Suite 700 Rm. 111 Nashville, TN 37214 Jamaica, NY 11434 Horst Greczmiel Mary Walsh Associate Director for NEPA Oversight Manager Council on Environmental Quality Federal Aviation Administration - New England 722 Jackson Place, NW Region Washington, DC 20503 Airports Division (ANE-600) 12 New England Executive Park Paul Devoti Burlington, MA 01803-5299 Program Analyst, Planning and Environmental Division Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Tier 1 Final EIS Page | FF-1 Volume 1 (Preferred Alternative) Appendix FF – Agency and Public Involvement (Federal Agencies) Amy Lind Corbett Megan Jadrosich Regional Administrator Federal Emergency Management Agency - Federal Aviation Administration - New England Region 2 Region 26 Federal Plaza Airports Division (ANE-600) 13th Fl. 12 New England Executive Park New York, NY 10278 Burlington, MA 01803-5299 Catherine McManus Paul F. Ford Acting Mission Support Director Acting Regional Administrator Federal Emergency Management Agency - Federal Emergency Management Agency - Region 3 Region 1 615 Chestnut St. 99 High St. 1 Independence Mall 6th Fl. Philadelphia, PA 19106-4404 Boston , MA 02110-2310 MaryAnn Tierney Ivy Frances Regional Administrator Branch Chief Federal Emergency Management Agency - Federal Emergency Management Agency - Region 3 Region 1 615 Chestnut St. 99 High St. 1 Independence Mall 6th Fl. Philadelphia, PA 19106-4404 Boston, MA 02110-2310 Gregory G. Nadeau David Robbins Administrator Operations Integration Branch Chief Federal Highway Administration Federal Emergency Management Agency - 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Region 1 Washington, DC 20590 99 High St. 6th Fl. Spencer Stevens Boston , MA 02110-2310 Transportation Planner, Office of Planning Oversight & Stewardship Jack Sullivan Federal Highway Administration Federal Emergency Management Agency - 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Region 1 Washington, DC 20590 99 High St. 6th Fl. Amy D. Jackson-Grove Boston, MA 02110-2310 Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration - Connecticut Jerome Hatfield Division Regional Administrator 628-2 Hebron Avenue Federal Emergency Management Agency - Suite 303 Region 2 Glastonbury, CT 06033 26 Federal Plaza 13th Fl. New York, NY 10278-0002 Tier 1 Final EIS Page | FF-2 Volume 1 (Preferred Alternative) Appendix FF – Agency and Public Involvement (Federal Agencies) Mary Ridgeway Patrick Bauer Division Administrator Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration - Delaware Federal Highway Administration - New 1201 College Park Dr. Hampshire Division Suite 102 James C. Cleveland Federal Building Dover, DE 19904 53 Pleasant St. Concord, NH 03301 Gregory Murrill Division Administrator Robert Clark Federal Highway Administration - DelMar Division Administrator Division, Baltimore Office Federal Highway Administration - New Jersey City Crescent Building Division 10 South Howard St. 840 Bear Tavern Rd. Baltimore, MD 21201 Suite 202 West Trenton , NJ 08628 Hassan Raza Division Administrator Peter Osborn Federal Highway Administration - DelMar Division Administrator Division, Dover Office Federal Highway Administration - New York 1201 College Park Dr. Division Suite 102 Leo W. O'Brien Federal Building Dover, DE 19904 11A Clinton Avenue Albany, NY 12207 Christopher Lawson Division Administrator John Formosa Federal Highway Administration - District of NYC Federal-aid Liaison Columbia Division Federal Highway Administration - New York 1990 K St., NW Division Suite 510 One Bowling Green Washington, DC 20006-1103 Room 428 New York, NY 10004 Todd Jorgensen Division Administrator Renee Sigel Federal Highway Administration - Maine Division Administrator Division Federal Highway Administration - Pennsylvania Edmund S. Muskie Federal Bldg. Division 40 Western Avenue 228 Walnut St. Augusta, ME 04330 Room 508 Harrisburg, PA 17101-1720 Pamela Stephenson Division Administrator Carlos Machado Federal Highway Administration - Division Administrator Massachusetts Division Federal Highway Administration - Rhode Island 55 Broadway Division 10th Fl. 380 Westminster St. Cambridge, MA 02142 Room 547 Providence, RI 02903 Tier 1 Final EIS Page | FF-3 Volume 1 (Preferred Alternative) Appendix FF – Agency and Public Involvement (Federal Agencies) Matthew Hake Helen Serassio Division Administrator Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration - Vermont Rm. E57-321 Division 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 87 State St. Washington, DC 20590 Suite 216 Montpelier, VT 05602 Sharyn LaCombe Federal Transit Administration - Office of Irene Rico Planning and Environment, Headquarters Division Administrator 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Federal Highway Administration - Virginia E45-339 Division Washington, DC 20590 400 North 8th St. Suite 750 Antoinette Quagliata Richmond, VA 23219-4825 Federal Transit Administration - Office of Planning and Environment, Headquarters Michael Johnsen 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Federal Railroad Administration, Office of E45-339 Railroad Policy and Development Washington, DC 20590 Rm. W38-203 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Lucy Garliauskas Associate Administrator Washington, DC 20590 Federal Transit Administration - Office of Planning and Environment, Headquarters Elizabeth Patel ATTN: Office of Planning and Environment Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE ATTN: Office of Planning and Environment Washington, DC 20590 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Charles Goodman Federal Transit Administration - Office of Therese McMillian Planning and Environment, Headquarters Acting Administrator ATTN: Office of Planning and Environment Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE East Building Washington, DC 20590 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Sean Sullivan Environmental Protection Specialist (CT, NH) Nathaniel Robinson Federal Transit Administration - Region 1 Associate Administrator for Communications & 55 Broadway Congressional Affairs 9th Fl. Federal Transit Administration Cambridge, MA 02142 Rm. E56-320 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Noah Berger Washington, DC 20590 Director of Planning Federal Transit Administration - Region 1 Kendall Square 55 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 Tier 1 Final EIS Page | FF-4 Volume 1 (Preferred Alternative) Appendix FF – Agency and Public Involvement (Federal Agencies) Nancy Danzig Mary K. (Missy) Morrison Director of Planning Resource Planning Specialist Federal Transit Administration - Region 2 National Park Service - Northeast Region One Bowling Green 200 Chestnut St. Rm. 429 5th Fl. New York, NY 10004-1415 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Victor Waldron John Piltzecker Federal Transit Administration - Region 2 National Park Service - Northeast Region One Bowling Green 200 Chestnut St. Rm. 429 5th Fl. New York, NY 10004-1415 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Vida Morkunas Kristy Beard Director, Office of Planning and Program Fishery Biologist Development NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service - Federal Transit Administration - Region 3 Annapolis Field Office 1760 Market St. 410 Severn Avenue Suite 500 Suite 107B Philadelphia, PA 19103-4124 Annapolis, MD 21403 Victor Knox William Barnhill Associate Director, Park Planning, Facilities and Fishery Biologist Lands NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service - National Park Service - Headquarters Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office 1849 C St., NW 55 Great Republic Dr. Washington, DC 20240 Gloucester, MA 01930 Shaun Eyring Mark Murray-Brown National Park Service - Northeast Region Section 7 Coordinator 200 Chestnut St. NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service - 5th Fl. Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office Philadelphia, PA 19106 55 Great Republic Dr. Gloucester, MA 01930
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Megalopolis: Trends and Prospects
    Megalopolis: Trends and Prospects J.R. Short* Introduction Megalopolis is a region spanning 600 miles from north of Richmond in Virginia to just north of Portland in Maine and from the shores of the Northern Atlantic to the Appalachians. Interstate 95 is its spine with major vertebrae at the metropolitan areas of Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York and Boston. As one vast conurbation that covers 52,000 square miles and contains 49 million people, Megalopolis is the densest urban agglomeration in the US, one of the largest city regions in the world, an important element in the national economy and a vital hub in a globalizing world. This paper is a condensed version of larger study (Short, 2007) and a more detailed analysis (Vicino, Hanlon and Short, 2007). The term megalopolis has an interesting history: it was the name given to a city in Peloponnese founded by Epaminondas around 371-368 BCE. Megalopolis was planned on the grand scale: the city walls formed a circle five miles in circumference. Great things were expected of the city, but it failed to realize the dreams of the founders, and it declined by the late Roman period. The term reemerged in the twentieth century. The Scottish polymath, urban scholar and planner Patrick Geddes (1854-1932) first employed the term in 1927 to designate one of the latter stages in his model of urban decline ranging from Metropolis to Necropolis. Geddes's disciple, the American Lewis Mumford (1895-1990) used the term and further developed the evolutionary model in his 1939 book, The Culture of Cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring Americaâ•Žs New •Œmegapolitanâ•Š Geography
    Brookings Mountain West Publications Publications (BMW) 2005 Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’s New “Megapolitan” Geography Robert E. Lang Brookings Mountain West, [email protected] Dawn Dhavale Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/brookings_pubs Part of the Urban Studies Commons Repository Citation Lang, R. E., Dhavale, D. (2005). Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’s New “Megapolitan” Geography. 1-33. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/brookings_pubs/38 This Report is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Report in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Report has been accepted for inclusion in Brookings Mountain West Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. METROPOLITAN INSTITUTE CENSUS REPORT SERIES Census Report 05:01 (May 2005) Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’s New “Megapolitan” Geography Robert E. Lang Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech Dawn Dhavale Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech “... the ten Main Findings and Observations Megapolitans • The Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech identifi es ten US “Megapolitan have a Areas”— clustered networks of metropolitan areas that exceed 10 million population total residents (or will pass that mark by 2040). equal to • Six Megapolitan Areas lie in the eastern half of the United States, while four more are found in the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal and Capacity Requirements
    CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE GAMING REGULATORY OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY Area 2: Fiscal and Capacity Requirements October 21, 2013 0 Table of Contents 1 Approach By direction of NH RSA 284-A, the New Hampshire Gaming Regulatory Oversight Authority has directed WhiteSand to prepare a report identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the 2013 NH legislative proposals as compared to the best and most relevant components of the regulatory provisions in the other comparator states. This part of the report addresses fiscal and capacity requirements: WhiteSand has approached this particular task using a formal methodology to determine market demand. We reviewed the specific demographics and other attributes of the gaming jurisdiction to be evaluated. This included, but was not limited to, population, income levels, age distribution, nearby competition and gaming tax rates. We evaluated these factors within ranges of 30, 60 and 90 miles of the proposed gaming facility general location. In order to provide a consistent measurement of demographics within a specific region we use distance radii from the region. Using distance rather than driving time eliminates fluctuations due to drive times, day of week, unpredictable events (e.g., accidents, weather, etc.) and other factors. Distance radii are translatable to drive times in most scenarios and provide more consistent results due to the reduction of unpredictability. Using this information, we then identifed a “Competitive Set” for the proposed gaming facility - other gaming properties to be compared based on similar demographics and characteristics. While the properties identified in the competitive set usually do not provide an exact match, they present enough similarities to evaluate market demand and estimate key financial statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis
    CTrail Strategies New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis Final Report June 2021 | Page of 30 CTrail Strategies Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 2. Existing Conditions: Infrastructure, Facilities, Equipment and Services (Task 1)............... 2 2.1. Capacity and Speed are Constrained by Legacy Infrastructure .................................... 3 2.2. Track Geometry and Slow Orders Contribute to Reduced Speeds ............................... 4 2.3. State-of-Good-Repair & Normal Replacement Improvements Impact Speed .............. 6 2.4. Aging Diesel-Hauled Fleet Limits Capacity ..................................................................... 6 2.5. Service Can Be Optimized to Improve Trip Times .......................................................... 7 2.6. Operating Costs and Revenue ........................................................................................ 8 3. Capacity of the NHL (Task 2)................................................................................................. 8 4. Market Assessment (Task 3) ............................................................................................... 10 4.1. Model Selection and High-Level Validation................................................................... 10 4.2. Market Analysis..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NHL Capacity and Speed FIN
    CTrail Strategies New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis Final Report June 2021 | Page of 30 CTrail Strategies Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 2. Existing Conditions: Infrastructure, Facilities, Equipment and Services (Task 1)............... 2 2.1. Capacity and Speed are Constrained by Legacy Infrastructure .................................... 3 2.2. Track Geometry and Slow Orders Contribute to Reduced Speeds ............................... 4 2.3. State-of-Good-Repair & Normal Replacement Improvements Impact Speed .............. 6 2.4. Aging Diesel-Hauled Fleet Limits Capacity ..................................................................... 6 2.5. Service Can Be Optimized to Improve Trip Times .......................................................... 7 2.6. Operating Costs and Revenue ........................................................................................ 8 3. Capacity of the NHL (Task 2)................................................................................................. 8 4. Market Assessment (Task 3) ............................................................................................... 10 4.1. Model Selection and High-Level Validation................................................................... 10 4.2. Market Analysis..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Impacts of Future Urban Expansion on Regional Climate in the Northeast Megalopolis, USA
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Meteorology Volume 2013, Article ID 362925, 10 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/362925 Research Article Impacts of Future Urban Expansion on Regional Climate in the Northeast Megalopolis, USA Yingzhi Lin,1 Anping Liu,1 Enjun Ma,1 Xing Li,1 and Qingling Shi2,3 1 School of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China 2 Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resource Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 3 Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China Correspondence should be addressed to Yingzhi Lin; [email protected] Received 21 June 2013; Accepted 14 August 2013 Academic Editor: Xiangzheng Deng Copyright © 2013 Yingzhi Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In this paper, evidences for influences of future urban expansion on regional climate in the Northeast megalopolis, USA, are presented. The model-based analysis shows that future urban expansion will significantly result in regional climate change. An ∘ ∘ average annual temperature increase ranging from 2 Cto5C in new urban area and an average annual temperature decrease ∘ ∘ ranging from 0.40 Cto1.20C in the south of the megalopolis will be caused by future urban expansion. The average annual precipitation of the simulation area will decrease due to future urban expansion by 5.75 mm, 7.10 mm, and 8.35 mm in the periods of 2010–2020, 2040–2050, and 2090–2100, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blueprint for American Prosperity
    Southwest Triangle Megapolitan Advanced Industry Status: And the Implications for Las Vegas Robert Lang, PhD Brookings Mountain West and The Lincy Institute What is the Southwest Triangle Megapolitan Cluster? In a 2011 book—Megapolitan America (APA Press)—Arthur C. Nelson and Robert E. Lang developed a spatial model for a Southwest Triangle of proximate large-scale “megapolitan areas.” The region contains three big metropolitan concentrations: Southern California from Los Angeles to San Diego, the Arizona Sun Corridor (Phoenix and Tucson) and Southern Nevada (including northwest Arizona). The Southwest Triangle is now the second largest concentration of urban population in the U.S. after the Northeastern Seaboard from Boston to Washington, DC. Nelson and Lang also compare the Southwest Triangle to the Texas Triangle (Dallas, Houston and San Antonio), arguing that the two regions share similar opportunities in global trade and exchanges of workforce within advanced industries Clustered megapolitan areas are the key urban spaces where the U.S. integrates into the global economy. These regions contain all of the major ports, air links, and most of the nation’s major corporate headquarters, tech Brookings Mountain West 4505 S. Maryland Parkway ● Box 453067 ● Las Vegas, NV 89154-3067 Phone 702-895-0088 ● Fax 702-895-0100 http://www.unlv.edu/brookingsmtnwest hubs, and R&D capacity. These regions maintain large-scale logistics and supply chain networks. In addition to dense business linkages, the regions also exchange workers and services. For example, a significant share of Southern Nevada’s heath care need is met in Southern California. Southern California and the Sun Corridor also provide advanced industry labor directly to Las Vegas; this includes skilled labor in sectors such as manufacturing and information technology.
    [Show full text]
  • RAPID CITIES Prototyping Urban Growth
    RAPID CITIES Prototyping Urban Growth Because cities are the funnels through which raw mate- rials and energy flow to create prosperity (and gener- ate waste), environmental problems increasingly boil down to the structure of cities and the way urban dwell- ers’ needs are met. Cities define the global economy… and for most of humanity, living in an innovative, dynamic, well- governed city means the difference between the most marginal existences and poverty alleviation… From population growth to climate emissions, human security to public health, the driving forces of Mona El Khafif the twenty-first century will be defined on the streets of the world’s cities California College of the Arts and made manifest in their communities, infrastructures, and buildings.1 When Jean Gottmann identified the urbanized northeastern seaboard of the United States in his four-year study Megalopolis,2 published in 1961, he argued that the 600-mile-long strip covering the area between Boston and Washington, with 30 million inhabitants, was the beginning of a new order in the organization of urban territories. While Gottmann initially forecasted an exclusively positive future for the newly identified urban condition, he revised his statements in 1975, pointing out that neither governmental institutions nor urban theories were able to handle this emerging dimension of urban aggregations.3 Twenty-three years later, in 1998, MVRDV published FARMA X: Excursions on Density, followed by MetaCity Datatown in 1999.4 Both publications can be understood as a symptom of an unfolding pragmatism in Dutch architecture and urban design, clearly incorporating the limita- tions of natural resources as well as space and making them the drivers of architectural diagrams.
    [Show full text]
  • BEREITSCHAFT, BRADLEY JAMES FRANK, Ph.D. Urban Form and Air Quality in U.S
    BEREITSCHAFT, BRADLEY JAMES FRANK, Ph.D. Urban Form and Air Quality in U.S. Metropolitan and Megapolitan Areas. (2011) Directed by Dr. Keith Debbage. 390 pp. The spatial form, or morphology, of urban areas may significantly affect the anthropogenic production of air pollutants. This dissertation explores the relationships between air quality and urban form at the metropolitan and megapolitan (multi- metropolitan) scale. Urban form was quantified for 86 metropolitan and 19 megapolitan areas using both pre-existing sprawl indices and multiple spatial metrics derived from remotely sensed landcover data. Air quality was assessed by measuring several key air pollutants, including the ambient concentration of ozone (O3), the non-point source emissions of the two O3 precursors nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the ambient concentration and non-point source emissions of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and coarse particulate matter (PM10), and the mobile emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2). The ambient concentrations of air pollutants were averaged over the 5-year period 1998 to 2002. While controlling for industrial emissions, climate, population and geographic area, multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the degree of association between measures of urban form and air quality. The results suggest that urban form has a measurable impact on both the non-point source emission and ambient concentration of air pollution. Urban areas that exhibited more “sprawl-like” urban forms (i.e. lower residential density, less street network connectivity, less contiguous urban development) generally had higher non-point source emissions and/ or ambient concentrations of air pollution. Pre-existing sprawl indices were most significantly associated with ambient concentrations, while two spatial-metrics based measures of urban structure, urban “continuity” and urban “shape complexity,” were most significantly associated with non-point source emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’S New “Megapolitan” Geography Robert E
    METROPOLITAN INSTITUTE CENSUS REPORT SERIES Census Report 05:01 (July 2005) Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’s New “Megapolitan” Geography Robert E. Lang Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech Dawn Dhavale Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech “... the ten Main Findings Megapolitans • The Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech identifies ten US “Megapolitan have a Areas”— clustered networks of metropolitan areas that exceed 10 million population total residents (or will pass that mark by 2040). • Six Megapolitan Areas lie in the eastern half of the United States, while equal to four more are found in the West. Megapolitan Areas extend into 35 states, France, including every state east of the Mississippi River except Vermont. Sixty Germany, and percent of the Census Bureau’s “Consolidated Statistical Areas” are found in the United Megapolitan Areas, as are 39 of the nation’s 50 most populous metropolitan Kingdom areas. • As of 2003, Megapolitan Areas contained less than a fifth of all land area in combined, the lower 48 states, but captured more than two-thirds of total US population or about with almost 200 million people. 202 million • Megapolitan Areas are expected to add 83 million people (or the current residents in population of Germany) by 2040, accounting for seven in every ten new Americans. By 2040, a projected 33 trillion dollars will be spent on 2005.” Megapolitan building construction. The figure represents over three quarters of all the capital that will be expended nationally on private real estate development. • In 2004, Democratic candidate John Kerry won the Megapolitan Area popular vote by 51.6 percent to 48.4 for President George W.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulaski Hwy Delaware
    retail/warehouse for sale 700 e. pulaski highway | elkton, maryland 21921 acres: 1.31 sq ft: 21,000 sale price: $900,000 700 E. Pulaski Highway is a 20,805 square foot freestanding Jodlbauer’s Furniture warehouse situated on 1.31 ± acres constructed in 1965. This structure includes a retail office area equal to 9,255 square feet and a warehouse area comprising 11,550 square overview feet. Said warehouse area boasts 24 ft. high ceilings and is serviced by loading docks. Visibility to the property is considered excellent, with 250 feet of frontage along E. Pulaski Highway (Rt. 40). Access is extremely convenient via the westbound lane of Route 40, full access to Delaware Avenue (MD Rt. 7) and 250 feet from the fully signalized intersection of Routes 40 & 7. 700 E Pulaski hwy route 7 (delaware ave) route 40 (e. pulaski hwy) 27,991 cars per day 6,661 cars per day route 40 (e. pulaski hwy) route 7 (delaware ave) 1 the site w thomson dr melbourne blvd The Village at Elkton 6,661 7 cars per delaware ave day pulaski hwy 40 pulaski hwy 7 40 27,991 1.31 acres cars per day 250 ft of frontage pulaski hwy 40 pulaski hwy 40 N 2 immediate vicinity Delancy Plaza Thomson Estates Elementary 40 Elkton Crossing 26,121 cars per The Village at day Elkton 40 SITE 27,991 cars per day 40 Cecil County Admin. Office N 3 location overview drive 0 hr. 1 hr. 1 hr. times 54 min. 2 min. 42 min. philadelphia, pa baltimore, md washington, d.c.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 5 Unit 2: the Northeast and Southeast Regions of the U.S
    Grade 5 Unit 2: The Northeast and Southeast Regions of the U.S. 9 Weeks of Instruction ​ Essential Questions ● What are different parts of the Northeast like? ● How do people live in the Northeast? ● What factors have shaped the culture of the Southeast? ● How has geography helped shape daily life in the Southeast? Learning/I Can Statements ● I can examine ways a diverse labor force affected economies in early ● I can research the development of the colonies by generating America . compelling and supporting questions ● I can examine the three branches of federal and state government to guide inquiry (e.g., Why did people settle where they did? How did including checks and balances and life seem better in the colonies than in England? Was life better in separation of powers. some colonies than in others? ● I can explain origins, functions, and structure of different systems of How were patterns of settlement influenced by beliefs, economics, government, including those and geography?) created by the Arkansas and U.S Constitutions. ● I can analyze the Revolutionary movement from multiple ● I can examine actions of individuals and groups that illustrate civic perspectives using primary and secondary virtues at the local, state, and national level. sources (e.g., loyalists, patriots, Native Americans, slaves. ● I can explain relationships between physical and human ● I can analyze causes and ideas leading to the American Revolution characteristics and changes over time using a (e.g., French and Indian War, variety of geographic representations. Stamp Act, Intolerable Acts, Boston Tea Party, independence, ● I can interpret the spatial characteristics and patterns of human representation, liberty).
    [Show full text]