The Diary of a Cavalry Officer in the Peninsular War and Waterloo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Diary of a Cavalry Officer in the Peninsular War and Waterloo BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Henrg HI. Sa^e 1S91 Cornell University Library DC 232.T65 1895 3 1924 024 323 663 The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924024323663 THE DIARY OF A CAVALRY OFFICER — — — — — SOME OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. for " A delightful book. It is a thousand pities it was not published long ago, it is one of the works that go to the making of history." Daily Chronicle. " Its narrative is simple and direct, the unpretending work of a modest man and a good soldier, who is content to record what he sees of the campaigns in which he ' served. '— Times. "This is the report of a transparently honest witness on a long heroic fight, of which Englishmen cannot be too proud in a sober, manly yiay." —Saturaay Review. " Mr. James Tomkinson has been well advised in publishing the diary of his father. The careful record of the daily life of an intelligent man and a good soldier through a period of the deepest interest. His diary affords just the kind of material that the historian rejoices to possess, and usually finds it most difiScult to acquire. He gives us a better idea of the state of daily life under Wellington's com- mand than any made book could afford. His pages are seldom dull, even when they are most occupied with technical details." Liverpool Post. " Colonel Tomkinson's son now performs a graceful and filial act in giving to the world this record of his gallant father's services. The book contains, besides explana- tory maps and plans, tables, statistics, and extracts of the greatest interest to military men and historical students. Two excellent reproductions of the likenesses of the diarist, his friend Major Cocks, and his favourite charger ' Bob,' add to the charm of the book, which from cover to cover is full of good reading." Si. James's Budget. " It is difScult to understand why these deeply-interesting records should have been allowed to lie hidden for a period of eighty years, when every word of such independent evidence as to the conduct of Wellington's great campaigns would have been eagerly prized by historians and the country at large. As a reliable account of the operations in the Peninsula and at Waterloo as witnessed by an ofiScer of Light Horse who took an active and honourable part in them, the diary of the late Lieutenant-Colonel William Tomkinson is quite unique. It is complete in every particular. The present volume is plain and practical, befitting characteristics of an English soldier ; it is free from every trace of exaggeration, or from the least intention of sacrificing absolute truth to a picturesque and thrilling style. This most clear and valuable account of Wellington's crowning triumph will be read by a very large circle. Colonel Tomkinson's Diary, now that it has at last been printed, will take a prominent position among the contemporary records of the gallant armies who faced and vanquished the legions of Napoleon." Morning Post. " Many readers, both military and civilian, and most of all the officers, and we trust men also, of the l6th Lancers will welcome this very graphic journal of an officer who contributed greatly to tlie honours of that regiment. Mr. Tomkinson has done exceeding well to give to the public this stoiy of brave deeds, and interesting circumstances. Such narratives give life to our history, and the pity is that there are not more of them." Army and Navy Gazelle. ^y/-:f'r/..^., „/./„.„., THE Diary of a Cavalry Officer IN THE PENINSULAR WAR AND WATERLOO CAMPAIGN 1S09— 1815 The Late Lieut.-Col. TOMKINSON idih Light Dragoons Edited by his Son JAMES TOMKINSON SECOND EDITION LONDON SWAN SONNENSCHEIN & CO. NEW YORK: MACMILLAN & CO. 1895 Debication TO THE COLONEL AND OFFICERS OF THE i6th (queen's) lancers as a tribute of respect to their distinguished regiment and in the hope that the contents may be . interesting in the present valuable in the future and an addition to the records of the past this book is dedicated by the AUTHOR'S SON EDITOR'S PREFACE. Although it may appear late in the day to publish for the first time a record of military life in the Peninsular and Waterloo campaigns, at a date now separated from us by the greater part of a century, I am encouraged by the opinion of many friends to hope that the contents of this book may prove not without interest to the general public, and possibly of some value to the student of military history. A recent perusal of the " Memoirs of General Marbot " make me fully sensible of the fact that, in comparison with the thrilling scenes and incidents with which that book of contemporary history abounds, this volume may appear tame, if not dull. The good horse "Bob" at Girijo cannot claim to emulate the deeds of "Lisette" at Eylau, although, like her, he saved his helpless rider from death or captivity ; nor had her master the opportunities, even if he had the will, to perform such deeds of desperate daring as the French General describes. Something, possibly, should be allowed for the difference of nationality and temperament of the two writers ; and, in any case, the writing of the English Cavalry Officer carries with it, I venture to think, by its direct- ness and simplicity, a conviction of accuracy and absence of exaggeration. The original volume was written near the scene of the events described in it, and bears at its commencement the superscription, " Copied from some memoranda made at the time." Both ink and writing have stood the test of age well, and are still for the most part clear and legible ; though fortunately for the Editor, a fair copy was also made some thirty-five years later. It has been thought best to publish it almost exactly as it was written, suppressing no names, and to let it tell its own story. Con- sequently, little is needed by way of introduction or explanation. The Author, Lieutenant-Colonel William Tomkinson, was the ' youngest son of Henry Tomkinson, Esq., of Dorfold Hall, Nantwich, Cheshire. Born in 1790, he was gazetted to a cornetcy in the i6th Light PREFACE. Vll Dragoons in December, 1807 ; joined his regiment in April, 1808; and in 1809 entered on that period of mihtary adventure de- scribed in this volume. He was thanked in the general orders of the day of January 22nd, 1811, and recommended for promotion in the Duke of Wellington's despatch to the Horse Guards of May 14th of the same year. In 1812 he was gazetted a Captain in the 60th Regiment, from which he exchanged back into his old regiment without leaving it. It is somewhat remarkable that, while severely wounded in four places in almost his first skirmish, he passed practically unscathed through four years' service in the Peninsula and the Waterloo campaign, although under fire, to the best of his recollection, on nearly one hundred occasions. He received the Peninsular and Waterloo medals, with clasps for the actions of Busaco, Fuentes, Salamanca, and Vittoria. Of his character it may be said that, simple in tastes and habits, quiet and unassuming in demeanour, yet prompt and decisive in action, of iron constitution, and an excellent rider, he was in all respects a worthy follower of the great leader under whom he served. He retired on half pay in 1821, and settling at Wellington in his native county, engaged actively in the duties and pursuits of a country gentleman, as a magistrate, landlord, and sportsman. In the hunting field he became as distinguished as in the field of battle, and with his two brothers formed one of the trio sung by the Cheshire poet as "The brothers three from Dorfold sprung whom none of us could beat." He married, in 1836, Susan, daughter of Thomas Tarleton, Esq., of Bolesworth Castle, Cheshire (by Frances, daughter of Philip Egerton, Esq., of Oulton Park), and sister of the late Admiral Sir Walter Tarleton, K.C.B., and died in 1872, in his 83rd year, leaving surviving issue four sons and two daughters. One of the former is Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Tomkinson, now in command of the ist Royal Dragoons; and upon me, as his heir and successor, devolves the duty of editing his diary. JAMES TOMKINSON. WiLLiNGTON Hall, Tarporley. PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. The favourable reception accorded to " The Diary " encourages its publication in a Second Edition identical with the first, with the exception of the correction of certain obvious errors or misprints. In all other respects the principle has been adhered to of altering the original as little as possible, and it is gratifying to note that this course has been generally commended by the reviewers of the work. I have thought it due to the credit of General Sir Hussey Vivian and his Brigade, to correct in a footnote, the substance of which appeared in a letter to the Morning Post in June last, the Author's mistaken impression as to the time and spot in which the Brigade charged and overthrew the enemy in the fiei^ stage of the Battle of Waterloo. The Editor. 42 To face page i. DIARY OF A CAVALRY OFFICER. April 1st, 1809. One squadron of the i6th Light Dragoons arrived at Falmouth and embarked yesterday, and the one to which I belonged this day marched in from Truro and im- mediately embarked.
Recommended publications
  • Wellingtons Peninsular War Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    WELLINGTONS PENINSULAR WAR PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Julian Paget | 288 pages | 01 Jan 2006 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781844152902 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom Wellingtons Peninsular War PDF Book In spite of the reverse suffered at Corunna, the British government undertakes a new campaign in Portugal. Review: France '40 Gold 16 Jan 4. Reding was killed and his army lost 3, men for French losses of 1, Napoleon now had all the pretext that he needed, while his force, the First Corps of Observation of the Gironde with divisional general Jean-Andoche Junot in command, was prepared to march on Lisbon. VI, p. At the last moment Sir John had to turn at bay at Corunna, where Soult was decisively beaten off, and the embarkation was effected. In all, the episode remains as the bloodiest event in Spain's modern history, doubling in relative terms the Spanish Civil War ; it is open to debate among historians whether a transition from absolutism to liberalism in Spain at that moment would have been possible in the absence of war. On 5 May, Suchet besieged the vital city of Tarragona , which functioned as a port, a fortress, and a resource base that sustained the Spanish field forces in Catalonia. The move was entirely successful. Corunna While the French were victorious in battle, they were eventually defeated, as their communications and supplies were severely tested and their units were frequently isolated, harassed or overwhelmed by partisans fighting an intense guerrilla war of raids and ambushes. Further information: Lines of Torres Vedras. The war on the peninsula lasted until the Sixth Coalition defeated Napoleon in , and it is regarded as one of the first wars of national liberation and is significant for the emergence of large-scale guerrilla warfare.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo in Myth and Memory: the Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 Waterloo in Myth and Memory: The Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES WATERLOO IN MYTH AND MEMORY: THE BATTLES OF WATERLOO 1815-1915 By TIMOTHY FITZPATRICK A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2013 Timothy Fitzpatrick defended this dissertation on November 6, 2013. The members of the supervisory committee were: Rafe Blaufarb Professor Directing Dissertation Amiée Boutin University Representative James P. Jones Committee Member Michael Creswell Committee Member Jonathan Grant Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For my Family iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Drs. Rafe Blaufarb, Aimée Boutin, Michael Creswell, Jonathan Grant and James P. Jones for being on my committee. They have been wonderful mentors during my time at Florida State University. I would also like to thank Dr. Donald Howard for bringing me to FSU. Without Dr. Blaufarb’s and Dr. Horward’s help this project would not have been possible. Dr. Ben Wieder supported my research through various scholarships and grants. I would like to thank The Institute on Napoleon and French Revolution professors, students and alumni for our discussions, interaction and support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • “Incorrigible Rogues”: the Brutalisation of British Soldiers in the Peninsular War, 1808-1814
    BRUTALISATION OF BRITISH SOLDIERS IN THE PENINSULAR WAR “Incorrigible Rogues”: The Brutalisation of British Soldiers in the Peninsular War, 1808-1814 ALICE PARKER University of Liverpool Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article looks at the behaviour of the British soldiers in the Peninsular War between 1808 and 1814. Despite being allies to Spain and Portugal, the British soldiers committed violent acts towards civilians on a regular basis. Traditionally it has been argued that the redcoat’s misbehaviour was a product of their criminal backgrounds. This article will challenge this assumption and place the soldiers’ behaviour in the context of their wartime experience. It will discuss the effects of war upon soldiers’ mentality, and reflect upon the importance of psychological support in any theatre of war. In 2013 the UK Ministry of Justice removed 309 penal laws from the statute book, one of these being the Vagrancy Act of 1824.1 This Act was introduced for the punishment of ‘incorrigible rogues’ and was directed at soldiers who returned from the Napoleonic Wars and had become ‘idle and disorderly…rogues and vagabonds’.2 Many veterans found it difficult to reintegrate into British society after experiencing the horrors of war at time when the effects of combat stress were not recognised.3 The need for the Act perhaps underlines the degrading effects of warfare upon the individual. The behaviour of British soldiers during the Peninsular War was far from noble and stands in stark contrast to the heroic image propagated in contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Organisation of the Spanisn Army, November 1812
    Appendix 1: Organisation of the Spanisn Army, November 1812 FIRST ARMY (CATALONlA) - LACY First Division Baza, Fernando VII, Leales Manresanos, Cazadores de Catalufla, Barcelona, Palma Second Division Ultonia, Matar6, Tarragona, Cardona, San Fernando, Ausona Unattached Borb6n, Tiradores de Busa, Gerona, Tiradores de Catalufla Total: sixteen battalions, c. 16 000 officers and men. SECOND AND THIRD ARMIES (LEV ANTE-ARAGON) - EUO (a) Second Army Villacampa' s Division 2° de la Princesa, 2° de Soria, 2° de Voluntarios de Arag6n, Voluntarios de Molina Bassecourt' s Division 2° de Voluntarios de Catalufla, 2° de Badajoz, Cazadores de Cuenca (two squadrons), Husares de Arag6n (two squadrons) EI Empecinado' s Voluntarios de Guadalajara, Voluntarios de Division Madrid, Tiradores de Sigüenza, Tiradores de Cuenca, Cazadores de Guadalajara (three squadrons), Cazadores Voluntarios de Madrid (three squadrons) Duran' s Division Cariflena, Voluntarios Numantinos, Cazadores de Soria, Voluntarios de Rioja, Dragones de Soria (three squadrons) Total: fourteen battalions, thirteen squadrons, c. 18 000 officers and men. 182 Appendix 1 183 (h) Third Army Vanguard - Freyre 1er de Voluntarios de la Corona, 1er de Guadix, Velez Malaga, Carabinieros Reales (one squadron), 1er Provisional de Linea (three squadrons), 2° Provisional de Linea (three squadrons), 1er Provisional de Dragones, (three squadrons), 2° Provisional de Dragones (three squadrons), 1er Provisional de Husares (two squadrons) Roche' s Division Voluntarios de Alicante, Canarias, Chinchilla, Cazadores de Valencia, Husares de Fernando VII (three squadrons) Montijo's Brigade 2° de Guardias Walonas, 1er de Badajoz, Cuenca Michelena' s Brigade 1er de Voluntarios de Arag6n, Tiradores de Cadiz, 2° de Mallorca Mijares' Brigade 1"' de Burgos, Alcazar de San Juan, BaHen, Lorca, Voluntarios de Jaen U na ttachedl garrisons Almansa, America, Alpujarras, Almeria, Cazadores de Jaen (one squadron), Cazadores de la Mancha (two squadrons) Total: twenty-two battalions, twenty-one squadrons, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington's Two-Front War: the Peninsular Campaigns, 1808-1814 Joshua L
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2005 Wellington's Two-Front War: The Peninsular Campaigns, 1808-1814 Joshua L. Moon Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES WELLINGTON’S TWO-FRONT WAR: THE PENINSULAR CAMPAIGNS, 1808 - 1814 By JOSHUA L. MOON A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History In partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded Spring Semester, 2005 The members of the Committee approve the Dissertation of Joshua L. Moon defended on 7 April 2005. __________________________________ Donald D. Horward Professor Directing Dissertation ____________________________________ Patrick O’Sullivan Outside Committee Member _____________________________ Jonathan Grant Committee Member ______________________________ Edward Wynot Committee Member ______________________________ Joe M. Richardson Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named Committee members ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS No one can write a dissertation alone and I would like to thank a great many people who have made this possible. Foremost, I would like to acknowledge Dr. Donald D. Horward. Not only has he tirelessly directed my studies, but also throughout this process he has inculcated a love for Napoleonic History in me that will last a lifetime. A consummate scholar and teacher, his presence dominates the field. I am immensely proud to have his name on this work and I owe an immeasurable amount of gratitude to him and the Institute of Napoleon and French Revolution at Florida State University.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of WATERLOO in GERMAN and BRITISH MEMORY, 1815-1915 Kevin Pryor Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected]
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Theses Theses and Dissertations 8-1-2010 THE MOBILIZATION OF MEMORY: THE BATTLE OF WATERLOO IN GERMAN AND BRITISH MEMORY, 1815-1915 Kevin Pryor Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses Recommended Citation Pryor, Kevin, "THE MOBILIZATION OF MEMORY: THE BATTLE OF ATERW LOO IN GERMAN AND BRITISH MEMORY, 1815-1915" (2010). Theses. Paper 312. This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MOBILIZATION OF MEMORY: THE BATTLE OF WATERLOO IN GERMAN AND BRITISH MEMORY, 1815-1915 by Kevin Pryor B.A., Millikin University, 1999 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Degree Department of History in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale August 2010 Copyright by Kevin Pryor, 2010 All Rights Reserved THESIS APPROVAL THE MOBILIZATION OF MEMORY: THE BATTLE OF WATERLOO IN GERMAN AND BRITISH MEMORY, 1815-1915 By Kevin Pryor A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the field of History Approved by: S. Jonathan Wiesen, Chair Joseph Sramek Theodore R. Weeks Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale June 28, 2010 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF KEVIN PRYOR, for the Master of Arts degree in HISTORY, presented on JUNE 28, 2010, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
    [Show full text]
  • PENINSULAR WAR Volume VII August 1813 to April 14, 1814 the Capture of St
    A / © 2008 AGI-Information Management Consultants May be used for personal purporses only or by A HISTORY libraries associated to dandelon.com network. OF THE PENINSULAR WAR Volume VII August 1813 to April 14, 1814 The Capture of St. Sebastian, Wellington's Invasion of France, Battles of the Nivelle, The Nive, Orthez and Toulouse SIR CHARLES OMAN Greenhill Books, London Stackpole Books, Pennsylvania CONTENTS Ferdinand VII, 'The Prisoner of Valencay' . Frontispiece SECTION XXXIX ST. SEBASTIAN AND SAN MARCIAL CHAPTER PAGE I. The Second Siege of St. Sebastian. August 1813 . 1 IL The Storm of St. Sebastian. August 31, 1813 . 23 III. The Battle of San Marcial: Surrender of the Castle of St. Sebastian. August 31-September 9, 1818 . 37 SECTION XL THE EAST COAST IN THE AUTUMN OF 1813 I. Suchet evacuates Valencia and Aragon. July 1813 . 63 II. Bentinck's invasion of Catalonia: Controversies between Suchet and Soult. August-September 1813 . .81 III. Bentinck's Campaign in Catalonia. Combats of Ordal and Villafranca. August-October 1813 ... 96 SECTION XLI WELLINGTON ENTERS FRANCE I. The Crossing of the Bidassoa. October 7, 1813 . 110 II. Between the Bidassoa and the Nivelle: Fall of Pam- peluna. October 8-November 9, 1813 . 137 III. The Battle of the Nivelle. November 10, 1818. i. The Preliminaries . 159 IV. The Battle of the Nivelle. ii. The Main Engagement . 174 V. The Battle of the Nivelle. Hi. The Right Wing . .195 SECTION XLII THE BATTLES OF THE NIVE I. Wellington's Problems. November 10-December 9,1818 209 II. The Crossing of the Nive. December 9 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the British Paper Pound, 1797-1821 ∗
    Fiscal Sustainability and the Value of Money: Lessons from the British Paper Pound, 1797-1821 ∗ Pamfili Antipa y Banque de France July 2014 Preliminary Abstract This article explores the determinants of price level fluctuations in Britain during the first suspension of the gold standard over the 1797-1821 period. I find that the contemporary price level was determined by world gold prices and expectations regarding the resumption of the gold standard at the pre-war parity. As the latter hinged on market participants’ expectations concerning the financial burden of the Napoleonic Wars, my contribution establishes the importance of fiscal factors for the determination of the price level. Keywords: Fiscal Theory of the Price Level, debt monetization, structural breaks. JEL: N13, N23, N43, C22. ∗The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Banque de France. All remaining errors are mine. I thank Robert Barsky, Jean Barthelemy, Vincent Bignon, Michael Bordo, Carlos Carvalho, Christophe Chamley, Rui Esteves, Pierre-Cyrille Hautcoeur, Christian Hellwig, Julien Matheron, Christopher Meissner, Eric Mengus, Benoit Mojon, Kim Oosterlinck, Xavier Ragot, Annukka Ristiniemi, Albrecht Ritschl, Pierre Sicsic, André Strauss, François R. Velde, and Eugene White for their very helpful comments. I am also grateful to seminar participants at the 2013 European Historical Economics Society Conference and the Florence FRESH meeting. ypamfi[email protected] 1 1 Introduction The first suspension of the gold standard in Britain from 1797 to 1821 - an episode known as the Restriction Period - is at the origin of monetary economics. Over the 1797-1821 Restriction Period, Britain under George III suspended the convertibility of Bank of England notes into gold in order to finance the Napoleonic Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Napoleon Bonaparte: His Successes and Failures
    ISSN 2414-8385 (Online) European Journal of September-December 2017 ISSN 2414-8377 (Print Multidisciplinary Studies Volume 2, Issue 7 Napoleon Bonaparte: His Successes and Failures Zakia Sultana Assist. Prof., School of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Sciences (UITS), Baridhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh Abstract Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), also known as Napoleon I, was a French military leader and emperor who conquered much of Europe in the early 19th century. Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After seizing political power in France in a 1799 coup d’état, he crowned himself emperor in 1804. Shrewd, ambitious and a skilled military strategist, Napoleon successfully waged war against various coalitions of European nations and expanded his empire. However, after a disastrous French invasion of Russia in 1812, Napoleon abdicated the throne two years later and was exiled to the island of Elba. In 1815, he briefly returned to power in his Hundred Days campaign. After a crushing defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, he abdicated once again and was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena, where he died at 51.Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform and the abolition of serfdom. After the fall of Napoleon, not only was the Napoleonic Code retained by conquered countries including the Netherlands, Belgium, parts of Italy and Germany, but has been used as the basis of certain parts of law outside Europe including the Dominican Republic, the US state of Louisiana and the Canadian province of Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 149 H-France Review Vol. 9 (March 2009), No. 38 John G
    H-France Review Volume 9 (2009) Page 149 H-France Review Vol. 9 (March 2009), No. 38 John G. Gallaher, Napoleon’s Enfant Terrible: General Dominique Vandamme. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 2008. 362 pp. Illustrations, maps, bibliography, and index. $34.95 U. S. (hb). ISBN 978-0-8061-3875-6. Review by Ralph Ashby, Eastern Illinois University. John G. Gallaher begins his study of General Vandamme boldly stating that, “Dominique-Joseph-René Vandamme, count of Unsebourg, was the General George Patton of the Napoleonic army” (p. 3). Gallaher’s book amply shows that in fact Vandamme was ultimately rather less successful and probably less brilliant than the controversial American general, but that is not the point of the analogy. Other than providing a point of reference for a portion of the reading audience, Gallaher sets up Vandamme’s personality: rebellious, ambitious, egotistical, and difficult. Gallaher’s interest in Vandamme originally began with a study of the 1813 campaign in Germany and the French defeat at Kulm in that campaign (p. xii). Readers should well note from the start that Gallaher is not a biographer. He is a military historian of the Napoleonic period, and a very accomplished one at that. Gallaher has used the approach of military biography before, most notably with his excellent study of Louis-Nicolas Davout some thirty years ago. Gallaher’s approach to Vandamme’s life is essentially a very straightforward military study. Gallaher explores the general’s personality to the extent it impacted Vandamme’s military career, while personal biographical details are sketched in.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington's History of the Peninsular War: Battling Napoleon in Iberia
    BOOK REVIEW: Wellington’s history of the Peninsular War: battling Napoleon in Iberia 1808 – 1814 by Stuart Reid Pen & Sword Military: Barnsley, South Yorkshire; 2019; 301 pp.; ISBN 9781526737632 (hardback); RRP $75.00; Ursula Davidson Library call number 515 REID 2019 Wellington’s History is a one-volume narrative of describing how the action unfolded. At times, he also Britain’s 1808-1814 war against Napoleon in Portugal gives the reasons for key decisions he may have taken. and Spain (the Peninsular War). Stuart Reid, author of He then goes on to ‘mention-in-despatches’ officers from numerous military history publications, has compiled the lieutenant-general down to major, and occasionally book from selected memoranda and despatches written captain, from the staff, infantry, artillery, engineers, and by Sir Arthur Wellesley (later Field Marshal, the Duke of the cavalry, who performed acts of gallantry and Wellington) as the war progressed. distinguished service. He usually concludes the During the Napoleonic Wars in 1807, a French army description of the battle with a tabulation of the British under Marshal Junot, with the encouragement of Spain, and Portuguese casualties and sometimes a brief had invaded Portugal. In 1808, when Spain abruptly mention of the French casualties including major switched from being an enemy to an ally of Britain, a weapons captured. I was particularly struck by the high British expeditionary force led by Wellesley was deployed casualties among the British general officers and to the Iberian Peninsula to support Portugal and Spain. colonels, many leading their men from the front. Wellesley would go on to command the British forces Sometimes, Wellesley will conclude a despatch at the in Iberia for seven years.
    [Show full text]
  • 'No Troops but the British': British National Identity and the Battle For
    ‘No Troops but the British’: British National Identity and the Battle for Waterloo Kyle van Beurden BA/BBus (Accy) (QUT), BA Honours (UQ) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry British National Identity and the Battle for Waterloo Kyle van Beurden Abstract In the ‘long eighteenth-century’ British national identity was superimposed over pre-existing identities in Britain in order to bring together the somewhat disparate, often warring, states. This identity centred on war with France; the French were conceptualised as the ‘other’, being seen by the British as both different and inferior. For many historians this identity, built in reaction and opposition to France, dissipated following the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo in 1815, as Britain gradually introduced changes that allowed broader sections of the population to engage in the political process. A new militaristic identity did not reappear in Britain until the 1850s, following the Crimean War and the Indian Mutiny. This identity did not fixate on France, but rather saw all foreign nations as different and, consequently, inferior. An additional change was the increasing public interest in the army and war, more generally. War became viewed as a ‘pleasurable endeavour’ in which Britons had an innate skill and the army became seen as representative of that fact, rather than an outlet to dispose of undesirable elements of the population, as it had been in the past. British identity became increasingly militaristic in the lead up to the First World War. However, these two identities have been seen as separate phenomena, rather than the later identity being a progression of the earlier construct.
    [Show full text]