DOCSLIB.ORG

Inception Report on Component 3.4 Danube Regional Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inception Report on Component 3.4 Danube Regional Project INCEPTION REPORT ON COMPONENT 3.4 DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT "ENHANCING ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING" IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, BULGARIA, CROATIA, ROMANIA, SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO December 2004 1 PREPARED BY THE CONSORTIUM OF MAGDA TOTH NAGY The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe 2000, Szentendre Ady E. ut, 9-11 Hungary JANE B. STEWART AND ERNESTINE MEIER New York University School of Law (NYU) 77 1/2 Charles St., New York, NY 10014 USA RUTH GREENSPAN BELL Resources for the Future International Institutional Development and Environmental Assistance (IIDEA) 1616 P Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 2 This Inception Report is prepared for component 3.4 of Objective 3 of the Danube Regional Project (phase 2). The overall focus under Objective 3 is to enhance awareness raising in civil society and reinforce the participation of NGOs and other interested parties in water management and pollution reduction (nutrients and toxic substances) with particular attention to transboundary cooperation and river basin management in the context of the Water Framework Directive. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 PART I INCEPTION PHASE 7 COUNTRY CONSULTATIONS 7 1. Presentation of Danube Regional Project and Project Component 3.4 8 2. Feedback on barriers to public access to information and public participation in environmental and water–related matters 8 3. National and operational teams 10 NEEDS ASSESSMENT 11 1. Preparatory documents 11 1.1 Outline for Needs Assessment 11 1.2 Questionnaire for Needs Assessment 12 2. National consultants 12 2.1. Selection process 12 2.2 Selected national consultants 13 ICPDR ASSESSMENT 14 1. Access to Information 14 2. Public Participation 14 COMMUNICATION ON PROJECT COMPONENT ACTIVITIES 15 ACTIVITIES SIMILAR OR OVERLAPPING WITH DRP COMPONENT 3.4 16 POSSIBLE CHANGES TO TERMS OF REFERENCE 17 PART II IMPLEMENTATION PHASE 18 WORK PLAN 18 ACTIVITIES 21 1. Criteria and selection process on the local demonstration projects 21 1.1 Selection criteria 22 1.2 Selection process 23 2. Technical assistance by NHL consultants 24 3. National capacity building workshops in 2005 25 4. Needs assessments 26 4 PART III ANNEXES - 27 A1 COUNTRY CONSULTATIONS 28 A2 PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED WITH IMPACT TO DRP 3.4 83 A3 LIST OF OPERATIONAL TEAMS 91 A4 OUTLINE FOR NEEDS ASSESSMENT 92 A5 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NEEDS ASSESSMENT 94 A6 TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR NEEDS ASSESSMENT 96 A7 CVs OF EXPERTS 99 A8 PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE DRP 3.4 TOR 137 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Component 3.4, in particular, will focus on supporting emerging processes of improved public participation in environmental decision making, with emphasis on better access to environmental information in decision making on hot spot prevention and cleanup. Over a period of 28 months, the Consortium of the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC), Resources for the Future (RFF) and New York University School of Law (NYU) will assist and advise in building capacity in government officials who are the “front lines” of access to information and responsible for implementing public participation through targeted training and technical assistance activities carefully tailored to the needs and circumstances of each country. National and local NGOs and the public involved in the Danube and water-related issues, the main stakeholders and partners of the officials involved in public participation, when engaged actively in this capacity building, will in turn support full and effective public involvement in planning in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and prevention and cleanup of Danube hot spots, an effect that should last long after the Danube Regional Project (DRP) has been completed. Component 3.4 begins with an Inception Phase. The purpose of this initial phase of four months is to take the first steps in getting the project started and to take decisions on the activities that will take place in the second, implementation phase of the project. This report has two parts. The first part describes the inception phase. Not each and every step taken or decision made is mentioned in Part I of the report. The aim of Part I is to provide the project donors and those responsible for both the larger DRP and Component 3.4 with an overview of the most important steps taken, findings and decisions made in the first four months of the project. The second part of the report is dedicated to the Implementation Phase of the project. Part II starts with a detailed work plan, which indicates the different activities that will be undertaken and the different work products that are prepared for these activities or will result from them. The work plan also provides a detailed timeframe of when and how activities are undertaken and when and how work products are prepared. A following section on activities highlights some of the main activities and work products planned for the Implementation Phase, describing what these activities and products consist of and how the Consortium has envisioned they should take place. The last section for Part II indicates a minor budget reallocation, decided by the Consortium after reconsideration of one of its activities in the Implementation Phase. 6 PART I INCEPTION PHASE COUNTRY CONSULTATIONS In October and November 2004, the Consortium organized country consultations in each of the five participating countries.1 The national consultation meetings were successful and were received with interest. Although in Serbia and Montenegro and Croatia the meetings were organized on rather short notice due to the late start of the project component activities and the capacity problems of the REC Country Office in Croatia, most relevant agencies and stakeholder groups were represented in the meetings, and there was active participation and good discussion. Major input and feedback was received that will be useful during the implementation of activities. The major in-country partners and project participants are aware of the proposed objectives, content and activities of the project component and a good working relationship has been established with them. However, some invitations for the consultations were sent out relatively late. Such late invitations can affect the perception of the component and may have resulted in lower representation by a few stakeholders that we would otherwise liked to have in attendance at some of the first national consultations. Preparation time for meetings in the future should not be underestimated. It was agreed that for future meetings, written invitations and materials would be sent well in advance, i.e., at least two weeks before the actual meeting for national meetings and, if at all possible at least one, or preferably even two months before international meetings. Advance verbal notification is not sufficient for some stakeholders. The main objectives of the meetings as defined beforehand by the Consortium were: To present to relevant stakeholders the UNDP-GEF Danube Regional Project and particularly Project Output 3.4 Enhancing Access to Information and Public Participation in Environmental Decision-making; To collect feedback at the national level on the project activities and expected outputs (including the scope and inputs needed for the needs assessment); and To identify experts and relevant stakeholders who should take part in the national teams, discuss the process of their establishment, and to start building stakeholder ownership of component 3.4. The consultation meetings in the five countries followed basically the same agenda developed by the Consortium in consultation with DRP. Where necessary, this agenda was adapted following requests by the national partners and the REC Country Offices. The meetings were chaired by the REC Country Office Director or the REC Project Manager and co-chaired by a representative of the Ministry of Environment and Waters. In some countries professional facilitators were used to lead the discussion, e.g., in Croatia. (For the meeting agenda, list of participants and meeting minutes of each country consultation, see Annex 1.) In each country, a representative of the ICPDR head of delegation was asked to address the meeting with an opening speech and to present the delegation’s perspective about the participation of the country in the ICPDR, DRP project activities as well as their views about the Project Component 3.4 and the implementation of the WFD access to information and public participation provisions in the country. 1 Serbia and Montenegro: October 12 in Belgrade; Bosnia and Herzegovina: October 14 in Tuzla; Croatia: October 22 in Zagreb; Romania: November 16 in Bucharest; Bulgaria: November 26 in Sofia. 7 1. Presentation of Danube Regional Project and Project Component 3.4 In the consultations, the general context in which project component 3.4 plays a role was presented by either Rayka Hauser, DRP Public Participation Expert or Magda Toth Nagy, REC Project Manager. The presentation included the goals and the approach of the ICPDR and the Danube Regional Project regarding public participation, and how the different project components (including component 3.4) address this issue. Details on Project Component 3.4 were presented by Magda Toth Nagy, REC Project Manager. Both presentations were followed by questions and answers. After the presentations, a plenary discussion followed about the current situation of public access to information and public participation in environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT for CROATIA 2020 – 1 of 186 –
    Centralized National Risk Assessment for Croatia FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CROATIA 2020 – 1 of 186 – Title: Centralized National Risk Assessment for Croatia Document reference FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date of approval: 02 July 2020 Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Performance and Standards Unit - Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2020 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non-government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CROATIA 2020 – 2 of 186 – Contents Risk assessments that have been finalized for Croatia .............................................. 4 Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Croatia ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Riviera Paklenica
    MTB 04* Velebit 3 Road 02* Paklenica 1 This attractive trail through the peaks and slopes of the southern Velebit moun- This bike route is intended for riders who prefer a long, constant but not too tain will be especially appealing to the MTB and trekking riders in better physi- steep ascent. In addition, you will get the chance to see Velebit mountain cal condition for whom long ascents do not represent a greater problem. From range both from the southern and from the northern side. After the start in the sea level start on almost 1000 m hights, beautiful panoramic views of the Starigrad, the route will first take you to the Adriatic road (Jadranska magis- Velebit canal and the Zadar archipelago will help you master a long ascent with- trala) right on the coast until you reach Rovenska and then you will start to out shades. Reaching the highest peak brings the reward of temperature differ- slightly ascent the Zrmanja Canyon up to the highest point (765 m), followed ence and awe of Tulove grede towers. Long serpentine descent to the Zrmanja by 11 km of well-deserved descent towards Gračac and Ričice lake. canyon will surely put a smile on your face. Given that there are no springs nor Start/Finish Starigrad Length 52.5 km gastronomic facilities on the trail, make sure to bring enough liquids. * Via Jasenice - Zaton Physical Difficulty 2/3 Route to be marked by Start/Finish Rovanjska Length 51 km Obrovački - Elevation 831 m Discover MTB, ROAD or FAMILY the end of Via Libinjska kosa - Physical Difficulty 3/3 Gračac - Štikada 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd International Conference “Alpine-Petrol'2012” HISTORY of OIL and GAS PRODUCTION in the CROATIAN PART of the PANNONIAN B
    2nd International Conference “Alpine-Petrol'2012” HISTORY OF OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION IN THE CROATIAN PART OF THE PANNONIAN BASIN SYSTEM Josipa VELIĆ1, Tomislav MALVIĆ1,2 and Marko CVETKOVIĆ1 1Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] 2Sector for Geology and Reservoir Management, INAIndustry of Oil Plc., Exploration and Production of Oil and Gas, Šubićeva 29, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Introduction On the basis of historical data, Croatia belongs to the first few pioneer countries in the world in which oil accumulations were researched and produced in the middle of the 19th century. Earlier oil production was only recorded in Russia, France, Romania and Germany. Application of oil in industrial purposes has a long tradition in Croatia, e.g. applications in medicinal preparations were recorded as early as in 14th and 15th century as “asphalt and petroleum”. More intense exploitation began just before the 2nd World war. Geological outline The Pannonian Basin System (PBS) is a back arc basin system that belongs to an area in the past covered by the Central Paratethys, and younger brackish and fresh-water environments formed from Paratethys. Inside PBS, numerous basins, depressions and subdepressions were formed along dextral and sinistral strike-slip faults. The area of the PBS in Croatian part is divided into the Drava, Sava, Mura, and Slavonija-Srijem depresions (Fig. 1A). The general evolution of their depositional environments, transport mechanisms, tectonics and dominant lithologies is very similar. Basin infill is manly comprised of Neogene-Quaternary rocks: breccia, conglomerates, sandstones, marls, shales, biogene limestones and efusives (1st megacycle – Lower and Middle Miocene), sandstones and marls (2nd megacycle – Upper Miocene) and clays, sands, loess and gravel (3rd megacycle – Pliocene, Pleistocene and Holocene) (Velić et al., 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Pravni Okvir Djelovanja Nacionalnih Parkova I Parkova Prirode S Osvrtom Na Strategiju Razvoja Turizma Republike Hrvatske
    Pravni okvir djelovanja nacionalnih parkova i parkova prirode s osvrtom na Strategiju razvoja turizma Republike Hrvatske Štefanko, Karmen Undergraduate thesis / Završni rad 2019 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: Polytechnic of Međimurje in Čakovec / Međimursko veleučilište u Čakovcu Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:110:739259 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-28 Repository / Repozitorij: Polytechnic of Međimurje in Čakovec Repository - Polytechnic of Međimurje Undergraduate and Graduate Theses Repository MEĐIMURSKO VELEUČILIŠTE U ČAKOVCU STRUČNI STUDIJ MENADŽMENT TURIZMA I SPORTA KARMEN ŠTEFANKO PRAVNI OKVIR DJELOVANJA NACIONALNIH PARKOVA I PARKOVA PRIRODE S OSVRTOM NA STRATEGIJU RAZVOJA TURIZMA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE ZAVRŠNI RAD ČAKOVEC, 2019. MEĐIMURSKO VELEUČILIŠTE U ČAKOVCU STRUČNI STUDIJ MENADŽMENT TURIZMA I SPORTA KARMEN ŠTEFANKO PRAVNI OKVIR DJELOVANJA NACIONALNIH PARKOVA I PARKOVA PRIRODE S OSVRTOM NA STRATEGIJU RAZVOJA TURIZMA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF NATIONAL PARKS AND NATURAL PARKS WITH AN INSIGHT INTO TOURISM STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ZAVRŠNI RAD Mentor: Magdalena Zeko, mag. iur., pred. ČAKOVEC, 2019. ZAHVALA Zahvaljujem svojoj mentorici Magdaleni Zeko koja mi je svojim dobronamjernim savjetima, stručnošću, i utrošenim vremenom pomogla u izradi ovoga završnog rada koji obilježava sav moj trud tijekom godina studiranja na Međimurskom veleučilištu u Čakovcu. Najviše zahvaljujem svojim roditeljima i prijateljima koji su mi tijekom studiranja bili psihički oslonac i financijska podrška i bez kojih ne bih bila u mogućnosti pisati ovu zahvalu. Stoga, veliko hvala svima! SAŽETAK U završnom radu prikazuje se pravno uređenje i postanak nacionalnih parkova i parkova prirode Republike Hrvatske. Detaljno se prikazuje način na koji je uređeno upravljanje i organizirana zaštita tih područja, kao i kojim se zakonima, mjerama i načinima upravlja visokom kategorijom zaštite, kao što je nacionalni park i park prirode.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Prirode Velebit
    Park prirode Velebit Dužina: 145 km, Vratnik – okuka Zrmanje Širina: Prosječna 14 km, max. 30 km, min. 10km. Površina 2 270 km2 Vrhova: 130 prosječne visine 1370 m. Sjeverni Velebit - vrhovi dosežu gotovo 1700 m (Mali Rajinac 1699 m), Srednji Velebit - vrhovi prelaze 1600 m (Šatorina 1624 m, Ograđenik 1604 m, Ograđenica 1614 m), Južni Velebit - vrhovi 1700 - 1758 m (Babin vrh 1723 m, Vaganski vrh 1757 m, Segestin 1715 m, Malovan 1709 m, Sveto brdo 1751 m) Park prirode Velebit • Ostala zaštićena područja unutar Parka prirode „Velebit“ temeljem upisnika zaštićenih područja Ministarstva kulture: • Kategorija zaštite Lokalitet • Strogi rezervati: Hajdučki i Rožanski kukovi (unutar granica NP "Sjeverni Velebit") • Botanički rezervati: Zavižan – Balinovac – Zavižanska kosa Visibaba (unutar granica NP "Sjeverni Velebit") • Rezervat šumske vegetacije: Šuma Štirovača na Srednjem Velebitu • Posebni geomorfološki rezervat: Cerovačke špilje kod Gračaca • Spomenici prirode: Velnačka glavica (paleontološki) • Značajni krajobraz: Zaljev Zavratnica (geomorfološki) Park prirode Velebit • KLIMA • Primorska padina – submediteranska • Kontinentalna padina – kontinentalna • Oborina • Vršni dio – max. južni Velebit > 3000 mm, • Podnožje – primorska padina prosječno 1188mm lička padina prosječno 1884 mm • Broj dana s maglom – 187 • Broj dana sa snijegom iznad 30 cm; • Primorska padina 0 • Lička padina 20-40 • Vršni dio 70 • Najviši vrhovi >100 Park prirode Velebit • Velebit – područje Nacionalne ekološke mreže – Važna područja za divlje svojte i stanišne tipove 31. Klepina duliba • 1. Cerovačka špilja donja 32. Ramino korito • 2. Cerovačka špilja gornja 33. Sadikovac • 3.Čavle špilja 34. Visočica • 4. Ivina jama 35. Veliki i Mali Kozjak • 5. Jama II kod Velikih Brisnica 36. Borov vrh • 6. Jama iznad Kugine kuće 37. Rončević dolac • 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Nacionalni Parkovi I Parkovi Prirode Republike Hrvatske I Njihova Prirodoslovna Primjenjivost Za Učenike U Primarnom Obrazovanju
    SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU UČITELJSKI FAKULTET ODSJEK ZA UČITELJSKE STUDIJE MONIKA VAGAJ DIPLOMSKI RAD NACIONALNI PARKOVI I PARKOVI PRIRODE REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE I NJIHOVA PRIRODOSLOVNA PRIMJENJIVOST ZA UČENIKE U PRIMARNOM OBRAZOVANJU Zagreb, rujan 2016. SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU UČITELJSKI FAKULTET ODSJEK ZA UČITELJSKE STUDIJE (Čakovec) PREDMET: PRIRODOSLOVLJE 4 DIPLOMSKI RAD Ime i prezime pristupnika: Monika Vagaj TEMA DIPLOMSKOG RADA: Nacionalni parkovi i parkovi prirode Republike Hrvatske i njihova prirodoslovna primjenjivost za učenike u primarnom obrazovanju MENTOR: dr. sc. Darinka Kiš-Novak, prof., v. pred. Zagreb, rujan 2016. ZAHVALA Iskreno hvala mentorici dr. sc. Darinki Kiš-Novak za pomoć pri odabiru teme diplomskog rada te za sugestije i primjedbe tijekom njegove izrade. Najviše zahvaljujem svojoj obitelji na neizmjernoj potpori i strpljenju tijekom čitavog mog školovanja. Hvala i svim mojim prijateljima i dragim ljudima koji su svojim pomaganjem, strpljenjem i moralnom podrškom uvelike utjecali na uspješnost završavanja ovog diplomskog rada. SADRŽAJ SADRŽAJ ........................................................................................................................... 3 SAŽETAK .......................................................................................................................... 5 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG .................................................................................................... 6 1. UVOD ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Annelida : Clitellata) on Freshwater Crayfish in Croatia
    Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 2006, 42 (4), 251-260 Occurrence of Branchiobdellida (Annelida : Clitellata) on freshwater crayfish in Croatia G.I.V. Klobucar√1*, I. Maguire1, S. Gottstein1, S. R. Gelder2 1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2 Department of Science and Math, University of Maine at Presque Isle, 181 Maine Street, Maine 04769, USA There is very little information on the genus Branchiobdella and the species relationships with their freshwater crayfish hosts in Croatia. Therefore, a base-line study was needed so that future changes in available habitat brought about by urban development and the probable introduction of non-native species can be accurately assessed. This investigation used preserved freshwater crayfish collected from across Croatia between 1995 and 2005 as its source of the ectosymbionts. Crayfish species included Astacus astacus, A. leptodactylus, Austropotamobius pallipes, A. torrentium, and the allochtonous North American species, Orconectes limosus. Only native European species of branchiobdellids were found: Branchiobdella astaci, B. parasita, B. pentodonta, B. hexodonta, B. italica, and B. balcanica, and this is the first report on the occurrence of these species, apart from B. italica, in Croatia. The distribution of these branchiobdellidans is compared with climatic and river drainage systems, and literature reports of populations in other countries in the region. Keywords: Branchiobdellidans, distribution, epibionts, freshwater crayfish, Croatia. Introduction stated the name balcanica due to its seniority over Pop’s (1965) proposed orientalis. At the higher taxonomic Branchiobdellidans are ectosymbiotic clitellate anne- level we have followed the common naming convention lids living primarily on freshwater astacoidean crayfish used in Brinkhurst and Gelder (2001) that uses bran- (Brinkhurst & Gelder 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • CROATIA the Trail Running Paradise VELEBIT-PAKLENICA-ZRMANJA
    CROATIA The Trail Running Paradise VELEBIT-PAKLENICA-ZRMANJA CLIMBING TREKKING & TRAIL MTB Welcome to a World Biosphere Reserve, feel free to take a deep breath! elebit is the largest Croatian Vmountain range (2274 km2), deeply interwoven into the space, lives and consciousness of the locals. Due to the impressive beauty of the landscape, the variety of relief shapes, flora and fauna as well as the untouched nature, it was declared a Nature Park and placed in the World Network of Biosphere Reserves (UNESCO, 1978) Numerous hiking trails, historical buildings, old regal trails, fortresses and sacred monuments are evidence of man’s centuries long relationship with this mythical mountain range. South Velebit is part of Zadar region in Dalmatia - the region of the sea, mountains, rivers, lakes and island. There are 4 National Parks (Paklenica, Kornati, Krka, Plitvička jezera) and 3 Nature Parks (Velebit, Vransko jezero, Telaščica), all within 100 km range! breathtaking beauty of Velebit A reaches its peak in Paklenica National Park, recognized for its monumental canyons vertically incised into the slopes of the mountain. On a relatively small area of a mere 95 km2 you will find exceptional landascape, over 4000 different fauna speceies, more than 150 km of hiking trails and over 400 climbing routes. The particular attraction of the area is the closeness of the seacoast, known as Paklenica Riviera. Along 20 km of seacoast gently laid out at the foot of Velebit mountain, Paklenica Riviera offers staying in a small places of preserved simplicity. Starigrad-Paklenica as the center of the area is a pleasent seaside resort as well as a traditional gathering place for hikers, climbers and all nature lovers who come to enjoy the beauties of the sea and the mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Procjena Dobrobiti Zaštićenih Područja (PA-BAT) U Hrvatskoj SADRŽAJ Fan Widstrand
    REPORT ADRIA 2017 Procjena dobrobiti zaštićenih područja (PA-BAT) u Hrvatskoj SADRŽAJ fan Widstrand UVOD 4 METODOLOGIJA 4 REZULTATI I RASPRAVA 7 GLAVNE EKONOMSKE VRIJEDNOSTI 12 TURIZAM 14 VODA 17 Promatranje ptica sve je češća turistička atrakcija u zaštićenim područjima © Staf RADNA MJESTA I ZAŠTITA PRIRODE 18 ŠUMARSTVO 21 TIJEK PRIHODA DIONICIMA 22 ZAŠTIĆENIH PODRUČJA GLAVNI POTENCIJALI 24 VAŽNOST DIJALOGA S DIONICIMA 27 IZAZOVI 28 ZAKLJUČAK 38 Izdavač: WWF Adria, Budmanijeva 5, 10 000 Zagreb, Hrvatska Za izdavača: Martin Šolar, direktor WWF Adria Autorice: Andrea Štefan i Kasandra-Zorica Ivanić Fotografija na naslovnoj stranici: Nacionalni park Kornati © Novena d.o.o. Dizajn: Ivan Antunović Kontakt: [email protected] [email protected] Tiskano na ekološki prihvatljivom papiru Veljača, 2017. Uvod Vizija je WWF-a1 osigurati da valjana procjena vrijednosti zaštićenih Sudionici radionica uz pomoć te metodologije ocjenjuju ekonomske područja rezultira većim interesom, kvalitetnijim investicijama i i neekonomske/egzistencijalne vrijednosti (zadovoljavanje osnovnih boljom očuvanosti prirodnih vrijednosti. Procjena usluga ekosusta- životnih potreba) u smislu njihovih dobrobiti za razne dionike/kori- va koje pružaju zaštićena područja dugoročno je važna za lokalno i snike. Dobrobiti se ocjenjuju na šest mogućih razina: nema dobrobiti, nacionalno gospodarstvo. Potrebne su godine rada na utvrđivanju mala ili značajna egzistencijalna dobrobit, mala ili značajna ekonomska vrijednosti, uključivanju ključnih donositelja odluka, promjeni dobrobit i potencijalna dobrobit. politika i razvoja gospodarskih modela u čije su razvojne planove uključene prirodne vrijednosti. WWF je izradio procjenu koja može PA-BAT je osmišljen kako bi ga koristili upravljači zaštićenih područja pružiti početnu informaciju o stavu dionika o stvarnim i potencijal- te kako bi u suradnji s ostalim dionicima odredili važne vrijednosti i nim vrijednostima zaštićenih područja, a s ciljem što skorije integra- dobrobiti koje one donose dionicima.
    [Show full text]
  • (Insecta, Trichoptera) of Four Adriatic Islands with a Note on Dna Barcoding
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE NAT. CROAT. VOL. 28 No 2 403-413 ZAGREB December 31, 2019 original scientific paper/ izvorni znanstveni rad DOI 10.20302/NC.2019.28.26 CADDISFLY FAUNA CHARACTERISTICS (INSECTA, TRICHOPTERA) OF FOUR ADRIATIC ISLANDS WITH A NOTE ON DNA BARCODING Mladen Kučinić1*, Anđela Ćukušić2, Hrvoje Plavec3, Miro Landeka4, Mladen Plantak5, Marijana Vuković6, Višnja Bukvić7, Milivoj Franjević8, Sanja Žalac9 & Gordan Lukač10 1Department of Biology (Laboratory for Entomology), Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2Ministry of environment and energy, Radnička cesta 80/7, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3Grožnjanska 18, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia 4 Marina Tartaglie 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia 5Elektroprojekt d.d., Civil and Architectural Engineering Department, Water Resources, Nature and Environmental protection, Alexandera von Humboldta 4, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 6Croatian Natural History Museum, Demetrova 1, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 7University Hercegovina, Blajburških žrtava 100, 88000 Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina 8Department for forestry and wildlife management, Faculty of Forestry, Svetošimunska 25, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb 9ZSC „Dr. Ivo Pevalek“, National park Plitvice Lakes, Josipa Jovića 19, 53231 Plitvička jezera, Croatia 10National park Paklenica, Dr. Franje Tuđmana 14a, 23244 Starigrad-Paklenica, Croatia Kučinić, M., Ćukušić, A., Plavec, H., Landeka, M., Plantak, M., Vuković, M., Bukvić, V., Franjević, M., Žalac, S. & Lukač, G.: Caddisfly fauna characteristics (Insecta, Trichoptera) of four Adriatic islands with a note on DNA barcoding. Nat. Croat., Vol. 28, No. 2., 403-413, 2019, Zagreb. To date, 13 species of Trichoptera from 11 genera and 8 families have been reported for the Adriatic islands of Cres, Krk, Pag and Hvar.
    [Show full text]
  • Invazivne Vrste U Zaštićenim Područjima Hrvatske
    Invazivne vrste u zaštićenim područjima Hrvatske Mandić, Antonela Undergraduate thesis / Završni rad 2018 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:217:860261 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-29 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of Faculty of Science - University of Zagreb SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU PRIRODOSLOVNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET BIOLOŠKI ODSJEK INVAZIVNE VRSTE U ZAŠTIĆENIM PODRUČJIMA HRVATSKE INVASIVE SPECIES IN PROTECTED AREAS OF CROATIA SEMINARSKI RAD Antonela Mandić Preddiplomski studijznanosti o okolišu (Undergraduate Study of Environmental Sciences) Mentorica: Izv. prof. dr. sc. Jasna Lajtner Zagreb, 2018. godina Sadržaj 1. UVOD ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2. INVAZIVNE VRSTE U NACIONALNIM PARKOVIMA ........................................................... 5 2.1. NACIONALNI PARK BRIJUNI ............................................................................................ 5 2.1.1. Trnovita dikica (Xanthium spinosum) ............................................................................. 5 2.2. NACIONALNI PARK KORNATI ......................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Grozdasta kaulerpa (Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindrea) ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Holiday Overview
    Viewed: 29 Sep 2021 Croatia – Coast and National Parks Activity Week HOLIDAY TYPE: Small Group BROCHURE CODE: 4031 VISITING: Croatia DURATION: 7 nights In Brief Our Opinion Croatia is perhaps best known for its coastline but, venture just a few miles inland and you’ll Croatia is utterly stunning – such luscious also find an interior to match anywhere in countryside and coastline, with a huge variety of Europe. This 7-night adventure is the active activities to match. White-water rafting, sea way for families to explore the best of both kayaking, hiking and cycling make this a fantastic Croatian worlds. itinerary for families looking for fun and adventure! Alex Charlton Speak to us on 01670 789 991 [email protected] www.activitiesabroad.com PAGE 2 What's included? • Transfers: group airport and activity transfers (private airport transfers may incur a supplement) • Accommodation: 7 nights two-bedroom apartment-style accommodation • Meals: 7 breakfasts, 1 lunch and 7 dinners • The following activities are included in the holiday: sea kayaking to Zlarin Island, cycling to Krka River National Park and short walk, Paklenica National Park hike and Zadar visit, white-water rafting and Zrmanja River canoe safari (order of activities is subject to change) • All equipment, tuition and supervision from fully qualified instructors • Services of our local representatives or guides • A note on flights: while flights are not included in the holiday price, our team will happily provide a quote and arrange them for you. Simply ask one of our Travel Experts for details of the available options Trip Overview Croatia is a country blessed by natural and manmade beauty.
    [Show full text]