DOCSLIB.ORG

12-Month Finding on a Petition to List the Tamaulipan Agapema

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
12-Month Finding on a Petition to List the Tamaulipan Agapema Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules 59623 no evidence that such exception would DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Comments received generally will be cause possible harmful interference to posted without change to http:// an authorized satellite system, said Defense Acquisition Regulations www.regulations.gov, including any transmission path may be authorized on System personal and/or business confidential waiver basis where the maximum value information provided. To confirm of the equivalent isotropically radiated 48 CFR Parts 205, 208, 212, 213, 214, receipt of your comment(s), please power (EIRP) does not exceed: 215, 216, and 252 check http://www.regulations.gov approximately two to three days after * * * * * RIN 0750–AH11 submission to verify posting (except (c) 12.7 to 13.25 GHz. No directional Defense Federal Acquisition allow 30 days for posting of comments transmitting antenna utilized by a fixed Regulation Supplement; Only One submitted by mail). station operating in this band with EIRP Offer (DFARS Case 2011–D013) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. greater than 45 dBW may be aimed Amy Williams, 703–602–0328. AGENCY: Defense Acquisition within 1.5 degrees of the geostationary- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: satellite orbit, taking into account Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). atmospheric refraction. I. Background ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of * * * * * DoD published a proposed rule in the comment period. Federal Register on July 25, 2011, at 76 7. Amend § 101.147 by revising FR 44293, with a request for comments paragraph (i) introductory text, adding SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) on or before September 23, 2011. The paragraph (i)(9), revising paragraph (o) comment period is being reopened introductory text, and adding paragraph to address acquisitions using competitive procedures in which only through October 7, 2011, to provide an (o)(8) to read as follows: one offer is received. With some additional time for interested parties to § 101.147 Frequency assignments. exceptions, the contracting officer must review the proposed DFARS changes. Therefore, accordingly, the comment * * * * * resolicit for an additional period of at least 30 days, if the solicitation allowed period for the proposed rule that (i) 5,925 to 6,425 MHz. 60 MHz fewer than 30 days for receipt of published on July 25, 2011, at 76 FR authorized bandwidth. proposals and only one offer is received. 44293 is reopened. * * * * * If a period of at least 30 days was Ynette R. Shelkin, (9) 60 MHz bandwidth channels: allowed for receipt of proposals, the Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations contracting officer must determine System. Transmit Receive prices to be fair and reasonable through [FR Doc. 2011–24783 Filed 9–26–11; 8:45 am] price or cost analysis or enter (receive) (transmit) BILLING CODE 5001–06–P (MHz) (MHz) negotiations with the offeror. DATES: The comment period for the 5964.97 6217.01 proposed rule that published on July 25, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 6024.27 6276.31 2011, at 76 FR 44293 is reopened. 6083.57 6335.61 Interested parties should submit written Fish and Wildlife Service 6142.87 6394.91 comments to the address shown below on or before October 7, 2011, to be 50 CFR Part 17 * * * * * considered in the formation of the final (o) 10,700 to 11,700 MHz. 80 MHz rule. [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2011–0078; MO 92210–0–0008 B2] authorized bandwidth. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, (8) 80 MHz bandwidth channels: identified by DFARS Case 2011–D013, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife using any of the following methods: and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a • Transmit Receive Regulations.gov: http:// Petition To List the Tamaulipan (receive) (transmit) www.regulations.gov. Agapema, Sphingicampa blanchardi (MHz) (MHz) Submit comments via the Federal (No Common Name), and Ursia furtiva eRulemaking portal by inserting 10745 11235 (No Common Name) as Endangered or ‘‘DFARS Case 2011–D013’’ under the Threatened 10825 11315 heading ‘‘Enter keyword or ID’’ and 10905 11395 selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the link AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 10985 11475 ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds Interior. 11065 11555 with ‘‘DFARS Case 2011–D013.’’ Follow ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition 11145 11635 the instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit finding. a Comment’’ screen. Please include your * * * * * name, company name (if any), and SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and [FR Doc. 2011–23000 Filed 9–26–11; 8:45 am] ‘‘DFARS Case 2011–D013’’ on your Wildlife Service, announce a 12-month BILLING CODE 6712–01–P attached document. finding on a petition to list the • E-mail: [email protected]. Include Tamaulipan agapema (Agapema DFARS Case 2011–D013 in the subject galbina), Sphingicampa blanchardi (no line of the message. common name), and Ursia furtiva (no • Fax: 703–602–0350. common name) as endangered or • Mail: Defense Acquisition threatened and to designate critical Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy habitat under the Endangered Species Williams, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), Act of 1973, as amended (Act). After Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon, review of all available scientific and Washington, DC 20301–3060. commercial information, we find that VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:38 Sep 26, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM 27SEP1 mstockstill on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 59624 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules listing any of these three southwestern of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife that the petition did not present moth species is not warranted at this and Plants that contains substantial substantial information that listing of time. However, we ask the public to scientific or commercial information those 270 species may be warranted. submit to us any new information that that listing the species may be This initial 90-day finding did not becomes available concerning the warranted, we make a finding within 12 include the Tamaulipan agapema, threats to these three species or their months of the date of receipt of the Sphingicampa blanchardi, or Ursia habitat at any time. petition. In this finding, we will furtiva. Subsequently, on March 13, DATES: The finding announced in this determine that the petitioned action is: 2009, the Service and WildEarth document was made on September 27, (1) Not warranted, (2) warranted, or (3) Guardians filed a stipulated settlement 2011. warranted, but the immediate proposal agreement, agreeing that the Service ADDRESSES: This finding is available on of a regulation implementing the would submit to the Federal Register a the Internet at http:// petitioned action is precluded by other finding as to whether their petition www.regulations.gov at Docket No. pending proposals to determine whether presented substantial information [FWS–R2–ES–2011–0078]. species are endangered or threatened, indicating that the petitioned action Supporting documentation we used in and expeditious progress is being made may be warranted for the remaining preparing our finding for Tamaulipan to add or remove qualified species from southwestern species by December 9, agapema and Sphingicampa blanchardi the Federal Lists of Endangered and 2009. On December 4, 2009, we made a is available for public inspection, by Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Section second 90-day finding for the remaining appointment, during normal business 4(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires that we species, which included a hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife treat a petition for which the requested determination that listing the Service, Corpus Christi Ecological action is found to be warranted but Tamaulipan agapema, S. blanchardi, Services Field Office, c/o TAMU–CC, precluded as though resubmitted on the and U. furtiva may be warranted, and 6300 Ocean Drive, #5837, Corpus date of such finding, that is, requiring a initiated a status review, which was Christi, TX 78412. Please submit any subsequent finding to be made within published in the Federal Register on 12 months. We must publish these 12- new information, materials, comments, December 16, 2009 (74 FR 66866). This month findings in the Federal Register. or questions concerning this finding for notice constitutes the 12-month finding Tamaulipan agapema and S. blanchardi Previous Federal Actions on both petitions to list the Tamaulipan to the Corpus Christi Ecological Services agapema, S. blanchardi, and U. furtiva On June 25, 2007, we received a as endangered or threatened. Field Office address. petition dated June 18, 2007, from Supporting documentation we used in Forest Guardians (now WildEarth Evaluation of the Status of Each of the preparing our finding for Ursia furtiva is Guardians), requesting that 475 species Three Moth Species available for public inspection, by in the southwestern United States, Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) appointment, during normal business including the Tamaulipan agapema, and implementing regulations (50 CFR hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Sphingicampa blanchardi, and U. part 424) set forth procedures for adding Service, Austin Ecological Services furtiva, be listed under the Act and species to, removing species from, or Field Office, 10711 Burnet Road, Suite critical habitat be designated. We reclassifying species on the Federal 200, Austin, TX 78758. Please submit acknowledged the receipt of the petition Lists of Endangered and Threatened any new information, materials, in a letter to the petitioner dated July 11, Wildlife
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Do Models of Insect Respiratory Patterns Fail? John S
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb130039. doi:10.1242/jeb.130039 COMMENTARY Why do models of insect respiratory patterns fail? John S. Terblanche1,* and H. Arthur Woods2 ABSTRACT exchange (the whole surface, lungs, gills, parapodia, everted rectal Insects exchange respiratory gases using an astonishing diversity of sacs, etc.). Usually there is convective transport (see Glossary) of patterns. Of these, discontinuous gas exchange cycles (DGCs) have oxygen to the exchange surface from the environment, either by received the most study, but there are many other patterns exhibited external currents of water or by active ventilation of the surface (e.g. ‘ ’ intraspecifically and interspecifically. Moreover, some individual tidal ventilation of lungs in mammals). Oxygen then moves insects transition between patterns based on poorly understood inward by diffusion across that surface, and CO2 (usually) moves combinations of internal and external factors. Why have biologists outward across the same structure. Because most animals are large failed, so far, to develop a framework capable of explaining this enough that internal diffusion-based supplies of oxygen become diversity? Here, we propose two answers. The first is that the highly inadequate (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1997), they use additional framework will have to be simultaneously general and highly detailed. internal systems for distributing the oxygen from the exchange It should describe, in a universal way, the physical and chemical surface to the mitochondria (and removing CO2). This they do processes that any insect uses to exchange gases through the largely by using muscular pumps that drive internal, oxygen- respiratory system (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Museum of Natural History
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE Denver Museum of Natural History SERIES 3, NUMBER 3, OCTOBER 15, 1993 A REVIEW OF THE GENUS AGAPEMA (LEPIDOPTERA: SATURNIIDAE) RICHARD S. PEIGLER Department of Zoology, Denver Museum of Natural History 2001 Colorado Boulevard, Denver, Colorado 80205-5798 and ROY O. KENDALL 5598 Mt. McKinley Drive N.E. San Antonio, Texas 78251-3626 ABSTRACT — Agapema is a genus of saturniid moths ranging in Mexico and the southwestern United States. Agapema galbina, the type-species, was found to be misidenti- fied by authors during the last 21 years. John Pope collected the original type specimens in the lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas, not in western Texas. Agapema platensis, spec. nov., is described from the Edwards Plateau of Texas. Four taxa in far western Texas (dyari, nom. rev.), Arizona and western Mexico (anona, stat. rev.), Baja California (pelora, stat. nov.) and northeastern Mexico (dentifasciata, stat. nov.), previously considered to he subspecies of galbina, are elevated to full species rank based on larval and genitalic dif- ferences. The female and mature larva of dentifasciata and mature larvae of dyari and platensis are described for the first time. Figures and a key to the adult moths are pro- vided. The distribution of each species is plotted on a map. All known records for host- plants and parasitoids are tabulated, and phylogeny, habitats, and other field observa- tions are discussed. KEYWORDS: Agapema, Arizona, Colorado, Condalia, galbina, Mexico, moths, par- asitoids, Rhamnaceae, Saturnia, Saturniidae, taxonomy, Texas PEIGLER AND KENDALL The genus Agapema is a holophyletic group of TAMU— Texas A&M University, College small to medium-sized nocturnal saturniid moths that Station range in southwestern North America south to the region SDNHM— San Diego Natural History Museum, of Mexico City.
    [Show full text]
  • June Preston, Editor 832 Sunset Drive USA No.2 Mar/Apr
    No.2 Mar/Apr 1983 of the LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY June Preston, Editor 832 Sunset Drive Lawrenc~KS 66044 USA ======================================================================================= ASSOCIATE EDITORS ART: Les Sielski RIPPLES: Jo Brewer ZONE COORDINATORS 1 Robert Langston 8 Kene1m Philip 2 Jon Shepard 5 Mo Nielsen 9 Eduardo Welling M. 3 Ray Stanford 6 Dave Baggett 10 Boyce Drummond 4 Hugh Freeman 7 Dave Winter 11 Quimby Hess =============================================================:========================= ZONE 1 SOUTHWEST: ARIZONA, NEVADA, CALIFORNIA. Coordinator: R. L. Langston (RLL). Contributors: R. L. Allen (RA), R. A. Bailowitz (RB), R. M. Brown (RMW), Jim and Joan Coleman (J-JC), K. Davenport (KD), J. F. Emmel (JE), C. D. Ferris (CDF), G. A. Gorelick (GG), C. Hageman (CH), K. Hansen (KH), R. V. Kelson (RK), T. W. Koerber (TK), R. H. Leuschner (RHL), D. Marion (DM), Eileen and S. O. Mattoon (E-SM), R. O'Donnell (RO), D. Parkinson (DP), F. P. Sala (FS), A. M. Shapiro (AS), o. Shields (OS), R. J. Skalski (RS) and W. L. Swisher (WS). COUNTY, STATE (in caps.) = new county, state records. NORTH, SOUTH, HIGH, LOW, EARLY, LATE, etc. (in caps.) are also considered records by the contributors and/or the coordinator. ARIZONA. No new COUNTY records or range extension for 1982. Most data was from the well-collected southeastern part of the state. Transients were hampered by cold, wet weather in Apache Co., Coconico Co., Cochise Co., Aug. (CDF), with heavy rains in Cochise Co., Sept. (RHL). Windy, cold and rainy in Pima Co., Sept. (RHL). No migrations were reported from Arizona. MOTHS: Sphingidae: Xylophanes falco, Cave Creek area, Chiricahua Mtns., Cochise Co., 9-11 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Brewster County, Texas, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Records for Parasitism in Saturniidae (Lepidoptera)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo Jahr/Year: 1984 Band/Volume: 5 Autor(en)/Author(s): Peigler Richard S. Artikel/Article: Recent records for parasitism in Saturniidae 95-105 ©Entomologischer Verein Apollo e.V. Frankfurt am Main; download unter www.zobodat.at Nachr. ent. Ver. Apollo, Frankfurt, N. F., Bd. 5, Heft 4: 95—105 — März 1985 95 Recent records for parasitism in Saturniidae (Lepidoptera) by RICHARD S. PEIGLER Abstract: Numerous records of parasites reared from Saturniidae are given, several of which are previously unpublished host-parasite associations. Records are from several regions of the U.S.A. and Central America, with a few from Hong Kong and one from France. Parasites reported here belong to the dipterous family Tachinidae and the hymenopterous families Ichneumonidae, Braconidae, Chalcididae, Perilampidae, Torymidae, Eupel- midae, and Eulophidae. Neuere Beobachtungen über Parasitismus bei Saturniidae (Lepidoptera) Zusammenfassung:Es werden verschiedene Beobachtungen über Parasiten, die aus Saturniiden gezüchtet wurden, gegeben, von denen einige bisher noch unbekannte Wirt-Parasit-Beziehungen darstellen. Die Beobachtungen stammen aus verschiedenen Regionen der USA und Zentralamerikas, einige aus Hongkong und eine aus Frankreich. Die hier genannten Parasiten gehören zu der Dipterenfamilie Tachinidae und den Hymenopterenfa- milien Ichneumonidae, Braconidae, Chalcididae, Perilampidae, Torymidae, Eupelmidae und Eulophidae. Insbesondere wird auf die Notwendigkeit, alle erreichbaren Nachweise von Parasitismus bei Schmetterlingslarven zu dokumentieren und die Parasiten von entsprechenden Fachleuten bestimmen zu lassen, hingewiesen. Sorgfäl­ tige Zuchtarbeit ist nötig, um einwandfreie Zuordnung der Parasiten zu ihrem jeweiligen Wirt zu ermöglichen; am besten eignet sich hierfür die Einzelhaltung parasitismusverdächtigter Larven.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Billing Code 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR
    Billing Code 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2011-0016] [MO 92210-0-0008-B2] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition to List the Bearmouth Mountainsnail, Byrne Resort Mountainsnail, and Meltwater Lednian Stonefly as Endangered or Threatened AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition finding. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 12-month finding on a petition to list the Bearmouth mountainsnail (Oreohelix species 3), Byrne Resort mountainsnail (Oreohelix species 31), and meltwater lednian stonefly (Lednia 1 tumana) as endangered or threatened, and to designate critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). After review of all available scientific and commercial information, we find that listing the Bearmouth mountainsnail and the Byrne Resort mountainsnail is not warranted because neither constitutes a valid taxon; therefore, they are not considered to be listable entities under the Act. We find that listing of the meltwater lednian stonefly is warranted. However, currently listing of the meltwater lednian stonefly is precluded by higher priority actions to amend the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Upon publication of this 12-month petition finding, we will add the meltwater lednian stonefly to our candidate species list. We will develop a proposed rule to list the meltwater lednian stonefly as our priorities allow. We will make any determination on critical habitat during development of the proposed listing rule. During any interim period, we will address the status of the candidate taxon through our annual Candidate Notice of Review (CNOR).
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Species Described from Big Bend National Park
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 Insect species described from Big Bend National Park Arnold F. Van Pelt Greensboro, NC Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Van Pelt, Arnold F., "Insect species described from Big Bend National Park" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 546. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/546 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 125 Insect species described from Big Bend National Park Arnold F.Van Pelt 203 Howell Place Greensboro, NC 27455 Abstract: The list contains 192 insect species, of which 139 are primary types. All have been described from material collected in or near Big Bend National Park, Texas Keywords: Big Bend National Park, holotypes, paratypes, allotypes, types, primary types, insects Introduction that the investigators used, e.g., months are either in Arabic or Roman numerals. A "$" symbol follow- Big Bend National Park is a large area of over ing an entry in References section papers cited 800,000 acres, the centerpiece of which is the Chi- here; the other references should be of aid to inves- sos Mountains, described as an island in the Chi- tigators who use this list. If a species has become a huahuan Desert.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Nevada, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Habrosyne scripta Lettered Habrosyne Habrosyne gloriosa Glorious Habrosyne Pseudothyatira cymatophoroides Tufted Thyatirid Thyatira mexicana Euthyatira lorata Euthyatira semicircularis Ceranemota improvisa Ceranemota fasciata Ceranemota crumbi Ceranemota semifasciata Ceranemota tearlei Ceranemota partida Ceranemota albertae Ceranemota amplifascia Bycombia verdugoensis Euthyatira pudens Dogwood Thyatirid Drepana arcuata Arched Hooktip Drepana bilineata Two-lined Hooktip Eudeilinia herminiata Northern Eudeilinea Oreta rosea Rose Hooktip Eudeilinia luteifera Southern Eudeilinia Coloradia pandora Pandora pinemoth Coloradia luski Lusk's pinemoth Coloradia doris Doris' pinemoth Coloradia velda Velda pinemoth Automeris io Io moth Automeris louisiana Louisiana eyed silkmoth Automeris randa Randa's eyed silkmoth Automeris iris Iris eyed silkmoth Automeris cecrops Cecrops eyed silkmoth Automeris zephyria Zephyr eyed silkmoth Automeris patagoniensis Patagonia eyed silkmoth Hylesia coinopus Hemileuca juno Juno buckmoth Hemileuca maia Eastern buckmoth Hemileuca nevadensis Nevada buckmoth Hemileuca artemis Hemileuca lucina New England buckmoth Hemileuca slosseri Slosser's buckmoth Hemileuca peigleri Hemileuca grotei Grote's buckmoth Hemileuca stonei Stone's buckmoth Hemileuca electra Electra buckmoth Hemileuca tricolor Tricolor buckmoth Hemileuca hualapai Hualapai buckmoth Hemileuca oliviae Range caterpillar moth Hemileuca burnsi Burns' buckmoth Hemileuca
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 138/Tuesday, July 19, 2011
    Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules 42631 include the information specified in agreement or amendment for which a authority pursuant to § 0.261 of this § 64.1001(c) of this chapter. Such filings modification request is required to be chapter. Interested parties will have 10 shall be made with the Commission, filed cannot become effective until the days from the date of issuance of a with a copy to the Chief, International modification request has been granted public notice of the petition to file Bureau. The transmittal letter under paragraph (e) of this section. comments or oppositions to such accompanying the confidential filing * * * * * petitions and subsequently 7 days for shall clearly identify the filing as 9. Section 64.1002 is amended by replies. In the event significant, responsive to § 43.51(f). revising the introductory text of immediate harm to the public interest is * * * * * paragraph (a), removing and reserving likely to occur that cannot be addressed through post facto remedies, the Note 3 to § 43.51: Carriers shall rely on the paragraph (b) and revising paragraphs Commission’s list of foreign carriers that do (c) and (d) to read as follows: International Bureau may impose not qualify for the presumption that they lack temporary requirements on carriers § 64.1002 International settlements policy. market power in particular foreign points for authorized pursuant to § 63.18 of this purposes of determining which of their (a) A common carrier that is chapter without prejudice to its findings foreign carrier contracts are subject to the authorized pursuant to part 63 of this on such petitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Notice of Review
    Wednesday, November 10, 2010 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:02 Nov 09, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10NOP3.SGM 10NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 69222 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Wildlife and Plants during the period Species-specific information and October 1, 2009, through September 30, materials we receive will be available Fish and Wildlife Service 2010. for public inspection by appointment, We request additional status during normal business hours, at the 50 CFR Part 17 information that may be available for appropriate Regional Office listed below [Docket No. FWS–R9–ES–2010–0065; MO– the 251 candidate species identified in under Request for Information in 9221050083–B2] this CNOR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General DATES: We will accept information on information we receive will be available Endangered and Threatened Wildlife any of the species in this Candidate at the Branch of Candidate and Plants; Review of Native Species Notice of Review at any time. Conservation, Arlington, VA (see That Are Candidates for Listing as address above). Endangered or Threatened; Annual ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review Notice of Findings on Resubmitted the Internet at http:// Petitions; Annual Description of www.regulations.gov and http:// Background Progress on Listing Actions www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/ cnor.html.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Month Finding on a Petition to List the Pacific Walrus As Threatened Or
    Vol. 76 Thursday, No. 28 February 10, 2011 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition to List the Pacific Walrus as Endangered or Threatened; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:13 Feb 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10FEP2.SGM 10FEP2 jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS2 7634 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: evaluate the Pacific walrus petition in James MacCracken, Marine Mammals FY 2008. Fish and Wildlife Service Management, Alaska Regional Office On December 3, 2008, the Center for (see ADDRESSES); by telephone: 800– Biological Diversity filed a complaint in 50 CFR Part 17 362–5148; or by facsimile: 907–786– U.S. District Court for the District of [Docket No. FWS–R7–ES–2009–0051; MO 3816. If you use a telecommunications Alaska for declaratory judgment and 92210–0–0008–B2] device for the deaf (TDD), please call the injunctive relief challenging the failure Federal Information Relay Service of the Service to make a 90-day finding Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. on their petition to list the Pacific and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: walrus, pursuant to section 4(b)(3) of the Petition to List the Pacific Walrus as Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. Endangered or Threatened Background 1533(b)(3), and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]