DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wednesday, December 16, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Partial 90-Day Finding on a Petition to List 475 Species in the Southwestern United States as Threatened or Endangered With Critical Habitat; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:19 Dec 15, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16DEP2.SGM 16DEP2 hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 66866 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ES-2008-0131; Division of Policy and scientific or commercial information Directives Management; U.S. Fish and you include. Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, If, after the status review, we Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203. determine that listing any of the 67 50 CFR Part 17 We will post all information received species is warranted, we will propose [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2008–0130] on http://www.regulations.gov. This critical habitat (see definition in section [92210–1111–0000–B2] generally means that we will post any 3(5)(A) of the Act) to the maximum personal information you provide us extent prudent and determinable at the Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (see the Request for Information section time we propose to list the species. and Plants; Partial 90-Day Finding on below for more information). Therefore, within the geographical range a Petition to List 475 Species in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: currently occupied by each of these 67 Southwestern United States as Nancy Gloman, Assistant Regional species, we request data and Threatened or Endangered with Critical Director, Southwest Regional Ecological information on: (1) what may constitute ‘‘physical or Habitat Services Office, 500 Gold Avenue SW, biological features essential to the Albuquerque, NM 87102; telephone AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, conservation of the species’’; Interior. 505/248-6920; facsimile 505/248-6788. (2) where these features are currently If you use a telecommunications device ACTION: Notice of 90–day petition found; and finding. for the deaf (TDD), please call the (3) whether any of these features may Federal Information Relay Service require special management SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and (FIRS) at 800-877-8339. considerations or protection. Wildlife Service (Service), announce a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In addition, we request data and 90–day finding on 192 species from a Request for Information information on ‘‘specific areas outside petition to list 475 species in the the geographical area occupied by the southwestern United States as When we make a finding that a species’’ that are ‘‘essential to the threatened or endangered under the petition presents substantial conservation of the species.’’ Please Endangered Species Act of 1973, as information indicating that listing a provide specific comments and amended (Act). For 125 of the 192 species may be warranted, we are information as to what, if any, critical species, we find that the petition did not required to promptly review the status habitat you think we should propose for present substantial information of the species (status review). For the designation if the species is proposed indicating that listing may be warranted. status review to be complete and based for listing, and why such habitat meets Based on our review, we find that the on the best available scientific and the requirements of section 3(5)(A) and petition presents substantial scientific commercial information, we request section 4(b) of the Act. or commercial information indicating information on each of the 67 species Submissions merely stating support that listing may be warranted for 67 of from governmental agencies, Native for or opposition to the action under the 192 species. Therefore, with the American Tribes, the scientific consideration without providing publication of this notice, we are community, industry, and any other supporting information, although noted, initiating a status review of the 67 interested parties. For each of the 67 will not be considered in making a species to determine if listing is species, we seek information on: determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the warranted. To ensure that the status (1) The species’ biology, range, and Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (16 review is comprehensive, we are population trends, including: U.S.C. 1533 (b)(1)(A)) directs that requesting scientific and commercial (a) Habitat requirements for feeding, determinations as to whether any data and other information regarding breeding, and sheltering; species is an endangered or threatened these 67 species. Based on the status (b) Genetics and taxonomy; species must be made ‘‘solely on the review, we will issue a 12–month (c) Historical and current range basis of the best scientific and finding on the petition, which will including distribution patterns; commercial data available.’’ address whether the petitioned action is (d) Historical and current population You may submit your information warranted, as provided in the Act. levels, and current and projected trends; concerning this status review by one of DATES: To allow us adequate time to and the methods listed in the ADDRESSES conduct a status review, we request that (e) Past and ongoing conservation section. If you submit information via we receive information on or before measures for the species or its habitat. http://www.regulations.gov, your entire February 16, 2010. After this date, you (2) The five factors that are the basis submission—including any personal must submit information directly to the for making a listing determination for a identifying information—will be posted Southwest Regional Ecological Services species under section 4(a) of the Act (16 on the website. If you submit a Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are: hardcopy that includes personal CONTACT section below). Please note that (a) The present or threatened identifying information, you may we may not be able to address or destruction, modification, or request at the top of your document that incorporate information that we receive curtailment of its habitat or range; we withhold this information from after the above requested date. (b) Overutilization for commercial, public review. However, we cannot ADDRESSES: You may submit recreational, scientific, or educational guarantee that we will be able to do so. information by one of the following purposes; We will post all hardcopy submissions methods: (c) Disease or predation; on http://www.regulations.gov. • Federal rulemaking Portal: http:// (d) The inadequacy of existing Information and supporting www.regulations.gov. Search for Docket regulatory mechanisms; or documentation that we received and no. FWS-R2-ES-2008-0130 and then (e) Other natural or manmade factors used in preparing this finding will be follow the instructions for submitting affecting its continued existence. available for you to review at http:// comments. Please include sufficient information www.regulations.gov, or you may make • U.S. Mail or hand delivery: Public with your submission (such as full an appointment during normal business Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R6- references) to allow us to verify any hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:40 Dec 15, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16DEP2.SGM 16DEP2 hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules 66867 Service, Southwest Regional Ecological threatened or endangered, and that we m. eremus to a full species, C. eremus. Services Office (see FOR FURTHER designate critical habitat concurrently The species is listed as endangered INFORMATION CONTACT). with the listing. The petition clearly throughout its range, so we did not identified itself as a petition and consider it as part of this petition. Background included the information required in 50 Ramsey Canyon leopard frog (Rana Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged subaquavocalis) is no longer recognized that we make a finding on whether a receipt of the petition in a letter dated as a distinct species (Crother 2008, p. 7). petition to list, delist, or reclassify a November 26, 2008. Pediomelum Rather, it is considered to be species presents substantial scientific or pentaphyllum was also included in the synonymous with the Chiricahua commercial information indicating that June 18, 2007, petition. This finding leopard frog (Lithobates [=Rana] a petitioned action may be warranted. will evaluate information in both chiricahuensis). The Chiricahua leopard We are to base this finding on petitions concerning P. pentaphyllum. frog is listed as threatened throughout information provided in the petition, On March 19, 2008, WildEarth its range, and any populations formerly supporting information submitted with Guardians filed a complaint indicating known as Ramsey Canyon leopard frog the petition, and information otherwise that the Service failed to comply with are thus now listed as threatened. readily available in our files. To the its mandatory duty to make a On December 13, 2007, we made a maximum extent practicable, we are to preliminary 90–day finding on the June 12–month finding that the Jollyville make this finding within 90 days of our 18, 2007, petition to list 475 southwest Plateau salamander (Eurycea tonkawae) receipt of the petition and publish our species. We subsequently published an warrants listing, but that listing is notice of this finding promptly in the initial 90–day finding for 270 of the 475 precluded by higher listing priorities (72 Federal Register. petitioned species on January 6, 2009, FR 71040), thus rendering the species to Our standard for substantial concluding that the petition did not candidate status. Similarly, on information within the Code of Federal present substantial information that December 6, 2007, we published our Regulations (CFR) with regard to a 90– listing of those species may be annual review of native species that are day petition finding is ‘‘that amount of warranted (74 FR 419).
Recommended publications
  • Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019

    Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019

    Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 3841 Number of items in BX 301 thru BX 463 1815 Number of unique text strings used as taxa 990 Taxa offered as bulbs 1056 Taxa offered as seeds 308 Number of genera This does not include the SXs. Top 20 Most Oft Listed: BULBS Times listed SEEDS Times listed Oxalis obtusa 53 Zephyranthes primulina 20 Oxalis flava 36 Rhodophiala bifida 14 Oxalis hirta 25 Habranthus tubispathus 13 Oxalis bowiei 22 Moraea villosa 13 Ferraria crispa 20 Veltheimia bracteata 13 Oxalis sp. 20 Clivia miniata 12 Oxalis purpurea 18 Zephyranthes drummondii 12 Lachenalia mutabilis 17 Zephyranthes reginae 11 Moraea sp. 17 Amaryllis belladonna 10 Amaryllis belladonna 14 Calochortus venustus 10 Oxalis luteola 14 Zephyranthes fosteri 10 Albuca sp. 13 Calochortus luteus 9 Moraea villosa 13 Crinum bulbispermum 9 Oxalis caprina 13 Habranthus robustus 9 Oxalis imbricata 12 Haemanthus albiflos 9 Oxalis namaquana 12 Nerine bowdenii 9 Oxalis engleriana 11 Cyclamen graecum 8 Oxalis melanosticta 'Ken Aslet'11 Fritillaria affinis 8 Moraea ciliata 10 Habranthus brachyandrus 8 Oxalis commutata 10 Zephyranthes 'Pink Beauty' 8 Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 Most taxa specify to species level. 34 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for bulbs 23 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for seeds 141 taxa were listed with quoted 'Variety' Top 20 Most often listed Genera BULBS SEEDS Genus N items BXs Genus N items BXs Oxalis 450 64 Zephyranthes 202 35 Lachenalia 125 47 Calochortus 94 15 Moraea 99 31 Moraea
  • Especies Vegetales En Peligro, Su Distribución Y Estatus De Conservación De Los Ecosistemas Donde Se Presentan

    Especies Vegetales En Peligro, Su Distribución Y Estatus De Conservación De Los Ecosistemas Donde Se Presentan

    ESPECIES VEGETALES EN PELIGRO, SU DISTRIBUCIÓN Y ESTATUS DE CONSERVACIÓN DE LOS ECOSISTEMAS DONDE SE PRESENTAN ENDANGERED VEGETAL SPECIES, THEIR DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE ECOSYSTEMS IN WHICH THEY OCCUR Mario Humberto Royo-Márquez1, Alicia Melgoza-Castillo2 y Gustavo Quintana-Martínez2 RESUMEN En México, la norma oficial mexicana (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) integra especies de flora y fauna silvestres en riesgo, pero no especifica su distribución geográfica. Como base para la realización de planes de conservación en el estado de Chihuahua es importante identificar las plantas incluidas en dicha norma, otras que deberían integrarse por su distribución restringida y rareza, así como el estado de conservación de los ecosistemas donde se presentan. En este contexto, se revisó una base de datos de alrededor de 4 000 especies de la flora de la entidad; se consultó la literatura disponible; y se realizaron visitas a diversos herbarios. En total se documentaron 195 taxa, 59 con estatus según la NOM-059, pertenecientes a 40 géneros y 21 familias, de los cuales, 19 especies son endémicas para México. Además, se proponen 31 taxa de 23 géneros y nueve familias, para ser estudiadas y evaluar su posible incorporación en la Norma, ya que son endemismos locales o registros únicos para México. Se sugieren 105 especies consideradas como raras, incluidas en 76 géneros y 37 familias. Los bosques y pastizales presentan el mayor número de especies con estatus y la más grande superficie con vegetación secundaria, lo que indica que esos ecosistemas presentan diversos grados de deterioro. Se requieren estudios poblacionales de las especies propuestas para plantear estrategias de conservación y manejo sustentable de los ecosistemas donde se desarrollan.
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road

    Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road

    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
  • Conservation Assessment for Cryptomastix Hendersoni

    Conservation Assessment for Cryptomastix Hendersoni

    Conservation Assessment for Cryptomastix hendersoni, Columbia Oregonian Cryptomastix hendersoni, photograph by Bill Leonard, used with permission. Originally issued as Management Recommendations February 1999 by John S. Applegarth Revised Sept 2005 by Nancy Duncan Updated April 2015 By: Sarah Foltz Jordan & Scott Hoffman Black (Xerces Society) Reviewed by: Tom Burke USDA Forest Service Region 6 and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program Cryptomastix hendersoni - Page 1 Preface Summary of 2015 update: The framework of the original document was reformatted to more closely conform to the standards for the Forest Service and BLM for Conservation Assessment development in Oregon and Washington. Additions to this version of the Assessment include NatureServe ranks, photographs of the species, and Oregon/Washington distribution maps based on the record database that was compiled/updated in 2014. Distribution, habitat, life history, taxonomic information, and other sections in the Assessment have been updated to reflect new data and information that has become available since earlier versions of this document were produced. A textual summary of records that have been gathered between 2005 and 2014 is provided, including number and location of new records, any noteworthy range extensions, and any new documentations on FS/BLM land units. A complete assessment of the species’ occurrence on Forest Service and BLM lands in Oregon and Washington is also provided, including relative abundance on each unit. Cryptomastix hendersoni - Page 2 Table of Contents Preface 1 Executive Summary 4 I. Introduction 6 A. Goal 6 B. Scope 6 C. Management Status 6 II. Classification and Description 7 A.
  • ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona

    ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona

    October 2015 BLM DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona Final Environmental Assessment Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA Bureau of Land Management Arizona State Office One North Central Avenue, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4427 October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iii Acronym List ................................................................................................................................... iv Section 1 – Proposed Action, Purpose and Need, and Background Information ........................... 1 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposed Action Overview ............................................................................................... 3 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ..........................................................................................
  • ASTERACEAE José Ángel Villarreal-Quintanilla* José Luis Villaseñor-Ríos** Rosalinda Medina-Lemos**

    ASTERACEAE José Ángel Villarreal-Quintanilla* José Luis Villaseñor-Ríos** Rosalinda Medina-Lemos**

    FLORA DEL VALLE DE TEHUACÁN-CUICATLÁN Fascículo 62. ASTERACEAE José Ángel Villarreal-Quintanilla* José Luis Villaseñor-Ríos** Rosalinda Medina-Lemos** *Departamento de Botánica Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro **Departamento de Botánica Instituto de Biología, UNAM INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGÍA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO 2008 Primera edición: octubre de 2008 D.R. © Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Instituto de Biología. Departamento de Botánica ISBN 968-36-3108-8 Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán ISBN 970-32-5084-4 Fascículo 62 Dirección de los autores: Departamento de Botánica Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro Buenavista, Saltillo C.P. 25315 Coahuila, México Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Instituto de Biología. Departamento de Botánica. 3er. Circuito de Ciudad Universitaria Coyoacán, 04510. México, D.F. 1 En la portada: 2 1. Mitrocereus fulviceps (cardón) 2. Beaucarnea purpusii (soyate) 3 4 3. Agave peacockii (maguey fibroso) 4. Agave stricta (gallinita) Dibujo de Elvia Esparza FLORA DEL VALLE DE TEHUACÁN-CUICATLÁN 62: 1-59. 2008 ASTERACEAE1 Bercht. & J.Presl Tribu Tageteae José Ángel Villarreal-Quintanilla José Luis Villaseñor-Ríos Rosalinda Medina-Lemos Bibliografía. Bremer, K. 1994. Asteraceae. Cladistics & Classification. Timber Press. Portland, Oregon. 752 p. McVaugh, R. 1984. Compositae. In: W.R. Anderson (ed.). Flora Novo-Galiciana. Ann Arbor The University of Michi- gan Press 12: 40-42. Panero, J.L. & V.A. Funk. 2002. Toward a phylogene- tic subfamily classification for the Compositae (Asteraceae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 115: 909-922. Villaseñor Ríos, J.L. 1993. La familia Asteraceae en México. Rev. Soc. Mex. Hist. Nat. 44: 117-124. Villaseñor Ríos, J.L. 2003. Diversidad y distribución de las Magnoliophyta de México.
  • Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

    Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

    Systematic Entomology (2005), 31, 113–144 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2005.00307.x The phylogeny of Sericini and their position within the Scarabaeidae based on morphological characters (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) DIRK AHRENS Deutsches Entomologisches Institut im Zentrum fu¨r Agrarlandschafts- und Landnutzungsforschung Mu¨ncheberg, Germany Abstract. To reconstruct the phylogeny of the Sericini and their systematic position among the scarabaeid beetles, cladistic analyses were performed using 107 morphological characters from the adults and larvae of forty-nine extant scarabaeid genera. Taxa represent most ‘traditional’ subfamilies of coprophagous and phytophagous Scarabaeidae, with emphasis on the Sericini and other melo- lonthine lineages. Several poorly studied exoskeletal features have been examined, including the elytral base, posterior wing venation, mouth parts, endosternites, coxal articulation, and genitalia. The results of the analysis strongly support the monophyly of the ‘orphnine group’ þ ‘melolonthine group’ including phytopha- gous scarabs such as Dynastinae, Hopliinae, Melolonthinae, Rutelinae, and Cetoniinae. This clade was identified as the sister group to the ‘dung beetle line’ represented by Aphodius þ Copris. The ‘melolonthine group’ is comprised in the strict consensus tree by two major clades and two minor lineages, with the included taxa of Euchirinae, Rutelinae, and Dynastinae nested together in one of the major clades (‘melolonthine group I’). Melolonthini, Cetoniinae, and Rutelinae are strongly supported, whereas Melolonthinae and Pachydemini appear to be paraphyletic. Sericini þ Ablaberini were identified to be sister taxa nested within the second major melolonthine clade (‘melolonthine group II’). As this clade is distributed primarily in the southern continents, one could assume that Sericini þ Ablaberini are derived from a southern lineage.
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents

    Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents

    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
  • Final Report for the University of Nottingham / Operation Wallacea Forest Projects, Honduras 2004

    Final Report for the University of Nottingham / Operation Wallacea Forest Projects, Honduras 2004

    FINAL REPORT for the University of Nottingham / Operation Wallacea forest projects, Honduras 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS FINAL REPORT FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM / OPERATION WALLACEA FOREST PROJECTS, HONDURAS 2004 .....................................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................................................3 List of the projects undertaken in 2004, with scientists’ names .........................................................................4 Forest structure and composition ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bat diversity and abundance ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Bird diversity, abundance and ecology ............................................................................................................................ 4 Herpetofaunal diversity, abundance and ecology............................................................................................................. 4 Invertebrate diversity, abundance and ecology ................................................................................................................ 4 Primate behaviour...........................................................................................................................................................
  • Download Vol. 46, No. 3

    Download Vol. 46, No. 3

    FLORIiDA -*="' MU,tUM L-ri. · OF NATURAL HISTORY™ SOME LANDSNAILS OF THE GENUS HUMBOLD TIA ATA FROM CHIHUAHUA AND WESTERN TEXAS Fred G. Thompson Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 61-98 2006 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE The:FLORIDA MUSEUM OF:NATURAL, HISTOR¥is F16ritirs Biate·museuin' 6ftbalital histbs *dieated, to ufltler$tamdi~g,-Bfekrving;sand interpreting biological diversity'and ctil#fral»fitage. The BULLETIN OF THE FLORI-DA MUSEUM OFNATURAL HISTORY is.a pe¢r-reviewed publicafion that publishes the'results,~rof o_Iiginil,f#Sta-feh ib zoology; batany, pafieontdiogy, archaeology, and museum scfence. Address aft, inquiries to th© Managing Editvr of'the. Bulletin. Nimibets oftthe Bulletin 'afe published at iffegulaf intervals. Specffie volumes are not nedly completed M any one year. The end of a polu-me: Will be, noted atfihev foot * of the first page,ofthe last issue in that v.elu.mel Riclied *tanz; ·AYangging .Editor Cathleen, L. Bester, Production Bulletin C6mmittee Richard Franz, Chairperson .Ahn,Cordell Sarah Fa2enbaker RiehardtHulbert William,Mar4uardt Susan Milbrath Iryy R. Quitmyer Scott Robinson, Ex q#icio Member ISSN: 0071-6154 Publication Date:, September 30,2006 Sbrid cumiaddications *cunce~ning purchase or exchange of the iftililitatib-* Ellid ibdnuiclfipt quefies t6: M#naging'Editor ofthe ]311LETIN Florida Museum-ofNaturalr History Uni*ersity ofFlorida PO Ba 119]800 Gainesv,ille. FL326,114?80»US.A. Phone: 312.3924721 · - Kax: 352-846-0287 e-mail6 el#[email protected] SOME LANDSNAILS OF THE GENUS HUMBOLDTIANA FROM CHIHUAHUA AND WESTERN TEXAS Fred G Thompsoni ABSTRACT Humboldtiana. (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Helicoidea, Humboldtianidae) is endemic to higher elevations of central and northern Mdxico, and southwestern Texas.
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae

    Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae

    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations

    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations

    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................