Karuk and Yurok Prescribed Cultural Fire Revitalization In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Karuk and Yurok Prescribed Cultural Fire Revitalization In KARUK AND YUROK PRESCRIBED CULTURAL FIRE REVITALIZATION IN CALIFORNIA’S KLAMATH BASIN: SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS AND POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF INDIGENOUS BURNING AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY TONY MARKS-BLOCK JUNE 2020 © 2020 by Tony Alex Marks-Block. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/cg226hq3123 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Lisa Curran, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Paulla Ebron I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Michael Wilcox Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Stacey F. Bent, Vice Provost for Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii ABSTRACT Fire exclusion and suppression policies, associated with timber extraction and structure protection, have precipitated unprecedented wildfires and associated destruction across California and throughout the American West. Before widespread Federal and State fire exclusion and suppression policies were enacted, American Indians intentionally set prescribed burns to enhance the abundance and quality of species and habitats fundamental to their livelihood and culture. These fires are known as cultural fires, and they limited woody fuels and, in turn, mitigated wildfire spread across the landscape. In northwest California, the Karuk and Yurok Tribes are leading recent efforts to revitalize and expand the use of cultural fires, and thus, present a distinctive and timely opportunity to evaluate the socio-ecological effects of a formerly widespread land management practice that was and still remains integral to Indigenous culture and California ecology. This dissertation uses mixed qualitative and quantitative social and ecological methods and analyses to evaluate the cultural fire resurgence in Karuk and Yurok territory. First, I examine historical and contemporary fire management as a product of colonialism and Indigenous resistance, modes of production (e.g., capitalist timber extraction and Indigenous subsistence economies), and (de)centralized governance systems. Then I present mixed method assessments of the effects of: 1) fire proxy treatments—developed by Karuk and Yurok basketweavers in the absence of cultural burning—on the production of California hazelnut (Corylus cornuta var. californica) basketry stems; 2) re-introduced cultural and prescribed burns on hazelnut basketry stem production and basketweaver harvesting and gathering decisions; and, 3) cultural fire frequency and fire exclusion on forest stand structure and overstory species composition. I conclude with an investigation of the factors that may either constrain or facilitate the expansion of cultural and prescribed burning in northern California. Acorns from oaks (Quercus spp. and Notholithocarpus densiflorus) and baskets composed of California hazelnut stems and other animal and plant materials were essential to pre- colonial Karuk and Yurok life, and these resources depended on cultural fire to enhance their qualities and abundance. Hence, Karuk and Yurok Tribal members resisted fire exclusion policies initiated in the early 20th century by the Federal and California State governments to conserve timber stocks and to encourage commercial tree production for timber markets. Although fire exclusion and suppression reduced cultural burning, historical documents demonstrate that resistance prevented the eradication of cultural fires, and also moderated regional timber harvests. When the USDA Forest Service and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection iv (CAL FIRE) began to allocate resources to prescriptive burning activities for fire and forest restoration in the 21st century, the Karuk and Yurok Tribes capitalized on these developments to re-introduce cultural burning through formal agreements and partnerships. Nonetheless, throughout this region, cultural burning currently remains limited in both area and frequency primarily because of insufficient funds and regulatory constraints. Due to entrenched fire exclusion and suppression policies, Karuk and Yurok basketweavers developed innovative cultural fire substitutes, or proxies, that replicated the disturbance of cultural fire to produce suitable basketry stems (straight and unbranched stems produced from underground buds post-fire). These proxy treatments include: cutting hazelnut stems manually, directly blistering hazelnut stems using a propane torch, and igniting surface fuels piled within hazelnut shrubs to top-kill stems. The experimental application of these treatments across 27 (16 m2) blocks resulted in the following outcomes. Compared to untreated shrubs, pile burning, propane torching, and cultural burning increased basketry stem production by 7- to 10-fold; while cutting increased production by 4-fold. These results demonstrate that these fire-proxy methods are an effective means to increase the production and the quality of basketry materials and, thus, could be integrated into forest restoration and fuel reduction projects when and where conditions for cultural burning is unfeasible. Since 2013, the advent of annual and biannual Prescribed Fire Training Exchanges (TREX) in Karuk and Yurok territory effectively expanded cultural burning, wherein ~552 ha was burned in ~54 cultural fires from 2015–2019. Within 21 of these cultural burn sites, hazelnut shrub densities, hazelnut stem production, and stem qualities were monitored post-fire, along with a suite of environmental and social variables. Hazelnut shrubs one growing season post-burn produced a 13-fold increase in basketry stems compared with shrubs ³ 3 growing seasons post- burn. Furthermore, areas burned at high frequencies (³ 3 events from 1989 to 2019) had 1.86-fold greater hazelnut shrubs than areas burned < 3 times. Observations of hazelnut basketry stem gathering found that 73% of gathering trips were to sites burned at high frequency. Basketweavers who did not have access to cultural burn sites travelled 3.8-fold greater distances to reach gathering sites burned by wildfires, where gathering rates were 1.6 stems/minute/individual, compared with harvesting trips to culturally burned sites, where gathering rates were 4.9 stems/minute/individual. High frequency cultural burning thus increases gathering efficiency because such practices facilitate higher density resources in closer proximity to residences when compared with unburned areas. A major objective of Karuk and Yurok cultural burns is to reduce Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) encroachment on oak woodlands and prairies to maintain ecological v heterogeneity, and to reduce surface fuel loads in order to protect homes and other built infrastructure in the event of a wildfire. My ecological surveys and remotely sensed analyses of deciduous tree cover found that high frequency burn sites facilitate the maintenance of hardwood tree overstories predominantly composed of deciduous California black oak (Quercus kelloggii), whereas low frequency burn sites (< 3 burns from 1989 to 2019) were dominated by Douglas fir. Surveys also found that cultural burns reduced leaf litter and small diameter dead, woody surface fuels (0 – 25 mm), reducing the potential intensity and rate of spread of an unplanned fire. The increased density of cultural keystone species documented in cultural burn areas provided evidence of positive human ecosystem engineering, and demonstrates that Karuk and Yurok cultural burning maintains desired ecological states that benefit Karuk and Yurok socio- economics and culture. Given the benefits of cultural and prescriptive burning, fire managers affiliated with public land agencies, Tribes, and diverse nongovernmental organizations are working to expand the frequency and area of intentional fires. However, there remains a shortage of wildland fire teams and experts required to conduct environmental reviews to implement and plan these burns. Centralized governance of wildland fire teams diverts their labor from prescriptive burns to the suppression of wildfires, and statewide burn bans prevent cultural burns from occurring during ideal conditions. Furthermore, neoliberal policies are reducing funding for staffing to support the expansion of prescriptive burning. To address this chronic underfunding on public lands and the high costs of burning on privately owned properties, communities and Tribes have developed decentralized prescribed burn associations and independent, qualified prescribed fire teams. Interagency partnerships have also provided supplemental funding and personnel to support burning across multiple jurisdictions. Increased
Recommended publications
  • CMS Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives in California
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives in California Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) staff work with beneficiaries, health care providers, state government, CMS contractors, community groups and others to provide education and address questions in California. American Indians and Alaska Natives If you have questions about CMS programs in relation to American Indians or Alaska Natives: • email the CMS Division of Tribal Affairs at [email protected], or • contact a CMS Native American Contact (NAC). For a list of NAC and their information, visit https://go.cms.gov/NACTAGlist Why enroll in CMS programs? When you sign up for Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or Medicare, the Indian health hospitals and clinics can bill these programs for services provided. Enrolling in these programs brings money into the health care facility, which is then used to hire more staff, pay for new equipment and building renovations, and saves Purchased and Referred Care dollars for other patients. Patients who enroll in CMS programs are not only helping themselves and others, but they’re also supporting their Indian health care hospital and clinics. Assistance in California To contact Indian Health Service in California, contact the California Area at (916) 930–3927. Find information about coverage and Indian health facilities in California. These facilities are shown on the maps in the next pages. Medicare California Department of Insurance 1 (800) 927–4357 www.insurance.ca.gov/0150-seniors/0300healthplans/ Medicaid/Children’s Health Medi-Cal 1 (916) 552–9200 www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal Marketplace Coverage Covered California 1 (800) 300–1506 www.coveredca.com Northern Feather River Tribal Health— Oroville California 2145 5th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interactive Brochure for Siskiyou and Humboldt Counties Variety of Socialand Healthservices
    W E L C O M E T O our LIFESTYLE Karuk Tribe An interactive brochure for Siskiyou and Humboldt Counties Skiing Camping Fishing Hiking River Fun Table of Contents of Table Swimming Rock Hounding Hunting Bird Watching Bicycling The Karuk Tribe is one of the largest Indian Tribal governments in Northern California. The Karuk Tribal community covers all of Siskiyou County and Eastern Humboldt Four-Wheeling Horse Back Riding Drop Camping Snowmobiling Golfing County from the Siskiyou County/Oregon border to Bluff Creek, encompassing approximately 4,000 miles. The service area has been divided accordingly, because the traditional land boundaries of the Karuk Tribe once included over one million acres of sacred grounds, hunting areas, and Indian communities along the Klamath and Salmon Rivers. The Karuk Tribe is a federally recognized Indian Tribe whose constitution was formally adopted by its members on April 17, 1985. Services provided by the Tribe include general government, education and a variety of social and health services. Southern Oregon Oregon Coast California Coast History Additional Info HOME Skiing Skiing Snowboard or ski down California’s majestic Mt. Shasta or Oregon’s amazing Mt. Ashland. Night skiing is a relaxing way to start your weekends. Cross Country more your style? Mountains and parks throughout Northern California and Southern Oregon will keep your skis happy. HOME Camping Camping There’s no better place to roast smores than while camping in Northern California. Klamath River, Trees of Heaven, Sarah Totten and Dillon Creek are a few locations to add to your camping destination list. HOME Fishing Grab your favorite fishing gear and head to one of the locals favorite fishing spots such as Trinity Lake, Shasta Lake, Lake Siskiyou, or the Fishing Klamath River.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 20/Tuesday, January
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 30, 2018 / Notices 4235 Type of Information Collection: electronic, mechanical, or other Disaster Grants—Public Assistance Revision of a currently approved technological collection techniques or (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, information collection. other forms of information technology, Hazard Mitigation Grant. OMB Number: 1660–0085. e.g., permitting electronic submission of Brock Long, FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 003–0–1, responses. Administrator, Federal Emergency Crisis Counseling Assistance and Dated: January 25, 2018. Management Agency. Training Program, Immediate Services [FR Doc. 2018–01775 Filed 1–29–18; 8:45 am] Program Application; FEMA Form 003– William H. Holzerland, 0–2, Crisis Counseling Assistance and Sr. Director for Information Management, BILLING CODE 9111–23–P Training Program, Regular Services Mission Support, Department of Homeland Security. Program Application; SF–424, Application for Federal Assistance; SF– [FR Doc. 2018–01765 Filed 1–29–18; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BILLING CODE 9111–23–P 424A, Budget Information for Non- Bureau of Indian Affairs Construction Programs; SF–425, Federal Financial Report; HHS Checklist/08– [189A2100DD/AAKC001030/ DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND A0A501010.999900 253G] 2007; HHS Project Performance Site SECURITY Location Form; ISP report narrative; Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible Quarterly Report Narratives; Final RSP Federal Emergency Management To Receive Services From the United Report Narrative,. Agency Abstract: The CCP consists of two States Bureau of Indian Affairs [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–3392– grant programs, the Immediate Services AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, EM; Docket ID FEMA–2018–0001] Program (ISP) and the Regular Services Interior. Program (RSP).
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2014 Newsletter
    6HFRQG$YH+DSS\&DPS&DOLI www.karuk.us FALL 2014 Your Vote Counts GeneralGeGenenerallEl ElectionEEle leectitioionon November 4, 2014 State Legislature Approves Gaming Compact 6WRU\3DJH Fall 2014 Page 2 #;7-+ Greetings From Your Tribal Council Russell Attebery Michael Thom Joseph Waddell Happy Camp Happy Camp Happy Camp Chairman Vice-Chairman Secretary/Treasurer TERM: Nov. 2011-Nov. 2015 TERM: Nov. 2010-Nov. 2014 TERM: Nov. 2011-Nov. 2015 Alvis Johnson Elsa Goodwin Josh Saxon Happy Camp District Happy Camp District Orleans District Member at Large Member at Large Member at Large TERM: Nov. 2012-Nov. 2016 TERM: Nov. 2012-Nov. 2016 TERM: Nov. 2013-Nov. 2017 VACANT Arch Super Sonny Davis Orleans District Yreka District Yreka District Member at Large Member at Large Member at Large TERM:Nov. 2013-Nov. 2017 TERM: Nov. 2010-Nov. 2014 We hope you enjoy reading about your tribe. If you would like to submit informa- WLRQWRWKHQHZVOHWWHUSOHDVHFDOORXU+XPDQ5HVRXUFHVRIÀFHIRULQVWUXFWLRQVRUHPDLO [email protected]. We look forward to reading about your successes and triumphs. FALL 2014 Page 3 Ayukii huut kich, Tribal Members Casino update: #;7-+ Good news!! The casino compact has been approved by the California State Senate and Assembly by a super majority vote. It was then sent to Governor Brown’s office for signature on August 29th. Thanks to the hard work of Lau- ra Mayton, Jaclyn Goodwin and Scott Quinn (our IGA) or Intergovernmental Agreement team, we were able to reach an agreement with the City of Yreka. Next is the agreement with Siskiyou County. We are going to work putting together that agreement as this newsletter is going to press.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]
  • NCRP Tribal Projects
    NCRP Tribal Projects Organization Name, Project Name Award Project Benefit Type Tribe Benefitted Karuk Tribe, Camp Creek Habitat Protection - Road water quality, salmonid $300,000 Karuk Tribe Decommissioning Implementation Project habitat Karuk Tribe, Lower Mid-Klamath Habitat Protection - Road water quality, salmonid $300,000 Karuk Tribe Decommissioning Implementation Project habitat Hopland Band of Pomo Indians, Angelica Creek Fish Hopland Band of Pomo $803,000 salmonid habitat Passage Indians Pinoleville Pomo Nation, Ackerman Creek Habitat water quality, salmonid $46,950 Pinoleville Pomo Nation Restoration habitat Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program, Restoration of Lower water quality, salmonid $421,354 Yurok Tribe Klamath River Habitats habitat Hoopa Valley Tribe, Hoopa Valley Public Utility District water supply, water $131,253 Hoopa Valley Tribe Conservation Project quality, salmonid habitat Hopland Band of Pomo Indians, Community Test Wells and Hopland Band of Pomo $149,170 water supply Water Security Study Indians Yurok Tribe, Yurok Watershed Restoration and Drinking water supply, water $702,463 Yurok Tribe Water Security quality, salmonid habitat Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria, Reclaimed water quality, water $558,562 Bear River Tribe Water Project supply water supply, water Yurok Tribe, Weitchpec Water Station $201,770 Yurok Tribe quality, salmonid habitat Hoopa Valley Tribe, Lower Supply Flood Risk Reduction and water quality, salmonid $655,475 Hoopa Valley Tribe Fisheries Habitat Improvement Project habitat Blue Lake
    [Show full text]
  • California-Nevada Region
    Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives California Nevada Introduction Page Introduction Page Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Beginning of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the U.S. Government and the Kahwea, San Luis Rey, and Cocomcahra Indians. Signed at the Village of Temecula, California, 1/5/1852. National Archives. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/55030733 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities California Native Communities To perform a search of more general records of California’s Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog, use Advanced Search. Enter California in the search box and 75 in the Record Group box (Bureau of Indian Affairs). There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of California, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites. Type California into the main search box for both. Related state agencies and universities may also hold records or information about these communities. Examples might include the California State Archives, the Online Archive of California, and the University of California Santa Barbara Native American Collections. Historic California Native Communities Federally Recognized Native Communities in California (2018) Sample Document Map of Selected Site for Indian Reservation in Mendocino County, California, 7/30/1856. National Archives: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/50926106 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic California Native Communities For a map of historic language areas in California, see Native Languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Patterns of Burn Severity in the Soberanes Fire of 2016 Christopher Potter* NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA
    hy & rap Na g tu o r e a Potter, J Geogr Nat Disast 2016, S6 l G f D o i s l a Journal of DOI: 10.4172/2167-0587.S6-005 a s n t r e u r s o J ISSN: 2167-0587 Geography & Natural Disasters ResearchResearch Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Landscape Patterns of Burn Severity in the Soberanes Fire of 2016 Christopher Potter* NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA Abstract The Soberanes Fire started on July 22, 2016 in Monterey County on the California Central Coast from an illegal campfire. This disastrous fire burned for 10 weeks at a record cost of more than $208 million for protection and control. A progressive analysis of the normalized burn ratio from the Landsat satellite showed that the final high burn severity (HBS) area for the Soberanes Fire comprised 22% of the total area burned, whereas final moderate burn severity (MBS) area comprised about 10% of the total area burned of approximately 53,470 ha (132,130 acres). The resulting landscape pattern of burn severity classes from the 2016 Soberanes Fire revealed that the majority of HBS area was located in the elevation zone between 500 and 1000 m, in the slope zone between 15% and 30%, or on south-facing aspects. The total edge length of HBS areas nearly doubled over the course of the event, indicating a gradually increasing landscape complexity pattern for this fire. The perimeter-to-area ratio for HBS patches decreased by just 3% over the course of the fire, while the HBS clumpiness metric remained nearly constant at a relatively high aggregation value.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Resources
    Supplemental Resources By Beverly R. Ortiz, Ph.D. © 2015 East Bay Regional Park District • www.ebparks.org Supported in part by a grant from The Vinapa Foundation for Cross-Cultural Studies Ohlone Curriculum with Bay Miwok Content and Introduction to Delta Yokuts Supplemental Resources Table of Contents Teacher Resources Native American Versus American Indian ..................................................................... 1 Ohlone Curriculum American Indian Stereotypes .......................................................................................... 3 Miner’s Lettuce and Red Ants: The Evolution of a Story .............................................. 7 A Land of Many Villages and Tribes ............................................................................. 10 Other North American Indian Groups ............................................................................ 11 A Land of Many Languages ........................................................................................... 15 Sacred Places and Narratives .......................................................................................... 18 Generations of Knowledge: Sources ............................................................................... 22 Euro-American Interactions with Plants and Animals (1800s) .......................................... 23 Staple Foods: Acorns ........................................................................................................... 28 Other Plant Foods: Cultural Context ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Tolowa Dee-Ni' Language Revitalization
    The Tolowa Dee-ni’ Language Revitalization Loren Me’-lash-ne Bommelyn Taa-laa-wa Dee-ni’ Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Language Revitalization, Is the Challenge The Challenge of Endangered Language recovery is uncertain work. Endangered Languages are spoken and unspoken. Many languages are retrieved from manuscripts, publications, audio files, ethnographies and from the hearts and minds of speakers. What will reform the speech community? Most children hear English and Spanish not Dee-ni'. How can an Endangered Language wage against media, Colonialism and singleness? What methodologies and approaches support Endangered Languages? “Teach what you learn and speak what you know.” The Taa-laa-wa Dee-ni’ Thea Ta -laa-wa Dee-ni' are a Dene (Athabaskan) speaking people of the Pacific Northwest. The Taa-laa-waa-dvn lays across ten rivers systems that empty into the Pacific in southwest Oregon and northern California. The neighbors of the Taa-laa- wa are the Yurok to the south, the Karuk, Takelma and Kalapuya to the east and the Coos to the north. The Yurok language is Algonquian. The Karuk language is Hokan. The Takelma, Kalapuya and Coos are Penutian. The Dee-ni' emerged following Genesis at Yan'-daa-k'vt, "South-up-hill”, the center of the Dee- ni' world. The Dee-ni’ Homeland Xatlh-srii-dvn - Genesis The Three Beings; Baby Sender, Daylight and Thunder living above the Earth in the Sweat House of Knowledge spoke and made the water covered earth. The first tree, the white redwood, stood upon the knoll as it slid forth from the south out of the watery depths at Yan’-daa-kvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Modeling of Extreme Wildland Fire Events
    Computational modeling of extreme wildland fire events: a synthesis of scientific understanding with applications to forecasting, land management, and firefighter safety Janice L. Coena,b W. Schroederc S Conwayd L Tarnaye a National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado b Corresponding author. [email protected] c NOAA/NESDIS/OSPO/SPSD, College Park, MD d Conway Conservation Group, Incline Village, NV e USDA Forest Service, Region 5 Remote Sensing Laboratory, McClellan, CA ACCEPTED Journal of Computational Science Formal publication location: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101152 1 Abstract The understanding and prediction of large wildland fire events around the world is a growing interdisciplinary research area advanced rapidly by development and use of computational models. Recent models bidirectionally couple computational fluid dynamics models including weather prediction models with modules containing algorithms representing fire spread and heat release, simulating fire-atmosphere interactions across scales spanning three orders of magnitude. Integrated with weather data and airborne and satellite remote sensing data on wildland fuels and active fire detection, modern coupled weather-fire modeling systems are being used to solve current science problems. Compared to legacy tools, these dynamic computational modeling systems increase cost and complexity but have produced breakthrough insights notably into the mechanisms underlying extreme wildfire events such as fine-scale extreme winds associated with interruptions of the electricity grid and have been configured to forecast a fire's growth, expanding our ability to anticipate how they will unfold. We synthesize case studies of recent extreme events, expanding applications, and the challenges and limitations in our remote sensing systems, fire prediction tools, and meteorological models that add to wildfires' mystery and apparent unpredictability.
    [Show full text]