Nuclear-Physics Aspects of Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion: Analysis of Promising Fuels and Gamma-Ray Diagnostics of Hot Plasma V
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Digital Physics: Science, Technology and Applications
Prof. Kim Molvig April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) DDD-T--TT FusionFusion D +T → α + n +17.6 MeV 3.5MeV 14.1MeV • What is GOOD about this reaction? – Highest specific energy of ALL nuclear reactions – Lowest temperature for sizeable reaction rate • What is BAD about this reaction? – NEUTRONS => activation of confining vessel and resultant radioactivity – Neutron energy must be thermally converted (inefficiently) to electricity – Deuterium must be separated from seawater – Tritium must be bred April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) ConsiderConsider AnotherAnother NuclearNuclear ReactionReaction p+11B → 3α + 8.7 MeV • What is GOOD about this reaction? – Aneutronic (No neutrons => no radioactivity!) – Direct electrical conversion of output energy (reactants all charged particles) – Fuels ubiquitous in nature • What is BAD about this reaction? – High Temperatures required (why?) – Difficulty of confinement (technology immature relative to Tokamaks) April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) DTDT FusionFusion –– VisualVisualVisual PicturePicture Figure by MIT OCW. April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) EnergeticsEnergetics ofofof FusionFusion e2 V ≅ ≅ 400 KeV Coul R + R V D T QM “tunneling” required . Ekin r Empirical fit to data 2 −VNuc ≅ −50 MeV −2 A1 = 45.95, A2 = 50200, A3 =1.368×10 , A4 =1.076, A5 = 409 Coefficients for DT (E in KeV, σ in barns) April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) TunnelingTunneling FusionFusion CrossCross SectionSection andand ReactivityReactivity Gamow factor . Compare to DT . April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) ReactivityReactivity forfor DTDT FuelFuel 8 ] 6 c e s / 3 m c 6 1 - 0 4 1 x [ ) ν σ ( 2 0 0 50 100 150 200 T1 (KeV) April 20, 2006: 22.012 Fusion Seminar (MIT) Figure by MIT OCW. -
Nuclear Fusion Enhances Cancer Cell Killing Efficacy in a Protontherapy Model
Nuclear fusion enhances cancer cell killing efficacy in a protontherapy model GAP Cirrone*, L Manti, D Margarone, L Giuffrida, A. Picciotto, G. Cuttone, G. Korn, V. Marchese, G. Milluzzo, G. Petringa, F. Perozziello, F. Romano, V. Scuderi * Corresponding author Abstract Protontherapy is hadrontherapy’s fastest-growing modality and a pillar in the battle against cancer. Hadrontherapy’s superiority lies in its inverted depth-dose profile, hence tumour-confined irradiation. Protons, however, lack distinct radiobiological advantages over photons or electrons. Higher LET (Linear Energy Transfer) 12C-ions can overcome cancer radioresistance: DNA lesion complexity increases with LET, resulting in efficient cell killing, i.e. higher Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE). However, economic and radiobiological issues hamper 12C-ion clinical amenability. Thus, enhancing proton RBE is desirable. To this end, we exploited the p + 11Bà3a reaction to generate high-LET alpha particles with a clinical proton beam. To maximize the reaction rate, we used sodium borocaptate (BSH) with natural boron content. Boron-Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) uses 10B-enriched BSH for neutron irradiation-triggered alpha-particles. We recorded significantly increased cellular lethality and chromosome aberration complexity. A strategy combining protontherapy’s ballistic precision with the higher RBE promised by BNCT and 12C-ion therapy is thus demonstrated. 1 The urgent need for radical radiotherapy research to achieve improved tumour control in the context of reducing the risk of normal tissue toxicity and late-occurring sequelae, has driven the fast- growing development of cancer treatment by accelerated beams of charged particles (hadrontherapy) in recent decades (1). This appears to be particularly true for protontherapy, which has emerged as the most-rapidly expanding hadrontherapy approach, totalling over 100,000 patients treated thus far worldwide (2). -
An In-Situ Accelerator-Based Diagnostic for Plasma-Material Interactions Science in Magnetic Fusion Devices by Zachary Seth Hartwig B.A
An in-situ accelerator-based diagnostic for plasma-material interactions science in magnetic fusion devices by Zachary Seth Hartwig B.A. in Physics, Boston University (2005) Submitted to the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2014 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2014. All rights reserved. Author............................................. ................. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering 21 November 2013 Certified by......................................... ................. Dennis G. Whyte Professor Thesis Supervisor Certified by......................................... ................. Richard C. Lanza Senior Research Scientist Thesis Reader Accepted by......................................... ................ Mujid S. Kazimi TEPCO Professor of Nuclear Engineering Chair, Department Committee on Graduate Students 2 An in-situ accelerator-based diagnostic for plasma-material interactions science in magnetic fusion devices by Zachary Seth Hartwig Submitted to the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering on 21 November 2013, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract Plasma-material interactions (PMI) in magnetic fusion devices such as fuel retention, ma- terial erosion and redeposition, and material mixing present significant scientific and engi- neering challenges, particularly for the next generation of devices that will move towards reactor-relevant conditions. Achieving an integrated understanding of PMI, however, is severely hindered by a dearth of in-situ diagnosis of the plasma-facing component (PFC) surfaces. To address this critical need, this thesis presents an accelerator-based diagnostic that nondestructively measures the evolution of PFC surfaces in-situ. The diagnostic aims to remotely generate isotopic concentration maps that cover a large fraction of the PFC surfaces on a plasma shot-to-shot timescale. -
Maximizing Specific Energy by Breeding Deuterium
Maximizing specific energy by breeding deuterium Justin Ball Ecole Polytechnique F´ed´eralede Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Specific energy (i.e. energy per unit mass) is one of the most fundamental and consequential properties of a fuel source. In this work, a systematic study of measured fusion cross-sections is performed to determine which reactions are potentially feasible and identify the fuel cycle that maximizes specific energy. This reveals that, by using normal hydrogen to breed deuterium via neutron capture, the conventional catalyzed D-D fusion fuel cycle can attain a specific energy greater than anything else. Simply surrounding a catalyzed D-D reactor with water enables deuterium fuel, the dominant stockpile of energy on Earth, to produce as much as 65% more energy. Lastly, the impact on space propulsion is considered, revealing that an effective exhaust velocity exceeding that of deuterium-helium-3 is theoretically possible. 1. Introduction The aim of this work is to investigate the basic question \What fuel source can provide the most energy with the least mass?" For this question, we will look into the near future and assume that the current incremental and steady development of technology will continue. However, we will not postulate any breakthroughs or new physical processes because they cannot be predicted with any certainty. It is already well-known that the answer to our question must involve fusion fuels [1,2], but nothing more precise has been rigorously establishedz. A more precise answer may be useful in the future arXiv:1908.00834v1 [physics.pop-ph] 2 Aug 2019 when the technology required to implement it becomes available. -
Prompt Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy in Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer
Prompt Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy in Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer Hugo Freitas Mestrado em Física Médica Departamento de Física e Astronomia 2020 Orientador Prof. Dr. João Seco, Faculdade de Ciências Coorientador Prof. Dr. Maria de Fátima, Faculdade de Ciências Todas as correções determinadas pelo júri, e só essas, foram efetuadas. O Presidente do Júri, Porto, / / UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO Prompt Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy in Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer Author: Supervisor: Hugo FREITAS Prof. Dr. Joao˜ SECO Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. Maria de FATIMA´ A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc. Medical Physics at the Faculdade de Cienciasˆ da Universidade do Porto Departamento de F´ısica e Astronomia January 8, 2021 “ Everything must be made as simple as possible. But not simpler. ” Albert Einstein Acknowledgements Since the beginning of my master program, I relied on the support of countless people and institutions, which help me to achieve this moment and to whom I am very grateful. To Professor Doctor Joao˜ Seco and Professor Doctor Maria de Fatima,´ respective advi- sor and co-advisor of the dissertation, I thank you for the monitoring, support and sharing of valuable knowledge for this work. To the Doctor Paulo Martins, I thank you for your support and all the help on this dis- sertation. To the group Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology for the support and friend- ship. To the institution Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum for the logistical and human support given during my internship. To the institute Heidelberg Ion-Therapy Center and its service of medical physics, Benjamin Ackermann, Thomas Tessonnier and Dr Stephan Brons. -
Determination of Fluoride in Water Residues by Proton Induced Gamma Emission Measurements
176 Fluoride Vol. 35 No. 3 176-184 2002 Research Report DETERMINATION OF FLUORIDE IN WATER RESIDUES BY PROTON INDUCED GAMMA EMISSION MEASUREMENTS AKM Fazlul Hoque,a M Khaliquzzaman,b MD Hossain,c AH Khand Dhaka, Bangladesh SUMMARY: A multielement proton induced gamma emission (PIGE) method has been developed to analyze fluoride in water residues obtained by evapo- ration. In this method, 200 mL of water sample mixed with 100 mg of cellulose powder is evaporated, and the residue is made into standard pellets that are then irradiated with a 2.9 MeV proton beam. The emitted γ-rays from the decay of the excited fluorine nuclei are detected with a high resolution, high purity germanium (HPGe) detector and analyzed using a commercial gamma ray spectrum unfolding software. For concentration calibration, synthetic fluoride standards of different concentrations, as NaF in a CaCO3 matrix, were pre- pared and homogenized by dispersing them in methanol. The method thus developed was applied to determine the concentration of fluoride in 85 water samples collected from different city supplies of Bangladesh. The concentra- tion ranged from 0.03 to 1.10 mg/L with the mean of 0.32 ± 0.21 mg/L. Keywords: Bangladesh, Fluoride analysis, Proton induced gamma emission, Water fluo- ride concentration, Water residue. INTRODUCTION Pollution of the biosphere with fluoride is a human health concern in many parts of the world. The fluoride content of drinking water is a very important factor from the health point of view. Dental researchers have reported that the -
ORNL Review, Vol
ON THE COVER John Bates examines a thin-film lithium battery in the light of the nitrogen glow discharge in the vacuum deposition chamber used to produce microbatteries at ORNL's Solid State Division. The nitrogen gas reacts with lithium orthophosphate to form a new battery electrolyte film discovered at ORNL. See the article on p. 46. Photo by Bill Norris. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Review is published quarterly and distributed to employees and others associated with ORNL. The address of the editorial office is Building 4500-South, M.S. 6144, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6144. Telephone: internal, 4-7183 or 4-6974; commercial, (615) 574-7183 or (615) 574-6974; FfS, 624-7183 or 624-6974. If you have changed your address and want to remain on the mailing list, please notify the editorial office. ORNL is managed by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. for the Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-840R21400 Printed in the United States of America. Available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161 . ISSN 0048-1262 Editor Carolyn Krause Associate Editor Jim Pearce Consulting Editor Bill Appleton Designer Vickie Conner Technical Editing Mike Aaron Electronic Publishing Bob Eldridge Photography, Graphic Arts, and Printing and Duplicating departments Volume 25 Number Two, 1992 2 State of the Laboratory-1991: Strengthening R&D Alvin Trivelpiece Organizational changes and enhanced computing capabilities should bolster ORNL's R&D. 28 An Eye on Reactor and Computer Control Jack Schryver and Bill Knee Eye-gaze measurement technology improved by ORNL software may have fascinating uses. -
Department of Physics Postgraduate Library List of Msc
Department of Physics Postgraduate Library List of MSc DISSERTATIONS As of 16.11.98 Name Year Title ABBOTT Miss C S 1984 In vivo measurement of the velocity of ultrasound using a real-time linear array (JCB). ABDULLA Y 1994 125I Labelling with Monoclonal Antibody ICR16 (MT) ABUELHIA E 1997 Positron and gamma-gamma coincidence emission tomography (NMS/MEM) ABOU-SHAKRA F 1987 Multi-element status of seminal plasma in relation to male infertility (NIW) ABUCHI C S 1983 Quantitative ultrasound in breast disease (RCC) ABUGRAIN S M 1983 Correction for body curvature, beam obliquity and tissue heterogeneity in radiotherapy treatment using a beam modifying device on a linear accelerator (SJH/CB) ABUZEITOON S 1996 Measurements of depth dose distribution in a soft-tissue equivalent phantom exposed to external gamma ray sources (WBG) ADACH J 1981 The experimental determination of the effective geometrical parameters of a weakly focused spherically curved transducer (RCC) ADAMS Miss G 1977 Air pollution in Great Britain (WBG) ADDISON Miss T A 1985 A review of detectors suitable for external monitoring of radionuclides deposited in vivo (WBG) ADEYEMO D J 1991 The determination of trace metals in mineral oils using electrothermal atomic absorption spectroscopy and neutron activation (NIW) AEDY C 1988 Design and construction of a calibration system, and development of a calibration procedure, for low energy X-ray and gamma emitting extended area sources (WBG) AGWU K K 1987 An evaluation/intercomparison of physical characteristics of film-screen systems -
X Ray and Gamma Ray Lasers
X RAY AND GAMMA RAY LASERS M. Ragheb 9/10/2005 INTRODUCTION The incentive for generating x ray and gamma ray lasers can be inferred from the equation for the energy carried by a photon of electromagnetic radiation. c Eh= ν = (1) γ λ -34 -21 where: h is Planck’s constant = 6.626x10 [Joules.sec] = 4.135x10 [MeV.sec], 10 c is the speed of light = 2.997x10 [cm/sec], -1 ν is the frequency, [Hertz], [sec ], λ is the wave length [cm]. Fig. 1: The electromagnetic spectrum. Short wave length radiation as x rays or gamma rays implies a high energy being carried by the photon since the wave length appears as a small number in the denominator of Eqn. 1. From Fig. 1, x ray photons would carry energy in the keV region, and gamma rays carry energy in the MeV region, as compared to light in the eV region. The idea of generating x ray lasers dates back to the 1970s, when scientists realized that laser beams amplified with ions would have much higher energies than beams amplified using gases. Nuclear explosions were considered as a power supply for these high-energy lasers. This became a reality at the time of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) of the 1980s, when x ray laser beams initiated by nuclear explosives possibly surrounded by rods of titanium, palladium or tantalum were generated underground at the Nevada Test Site. At the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) the Novette laser, precursor of the Nova laser, was used for the first laboratory demonstration of an x ray laser in 1984. -
Fusion Reactions Initiated by Laser-Accelerated Particle Beams in a Laser-Produced Plasma
ARTICLE Received 24 Jan 2013 | Accepted 27 Aug 2013 | Published 8 Oct 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3506 Fusion reactions initiated by laser-accelerated particle beams in a laser-produced plasma C. Labaune1, C. Baccou1, S. Depierreux2, C. Goyon2, G. Loisel1, V. Yahia1 & J. Rafelski3 The advent of high-intensity-pulsed laser technology enables the generation of extreme states of matter under conditions that are far from thermal equilibrium. This in turn could enable different approaches to generating energy from nuclear fusion. Relaxing the equili- brium requirement could widen the range of isotopes used in fusion fuels permitting cleaner and less hazardous reactions that do not produce high-energy neutrons. Here we propose and implement a means to drive fusion reactions between protons and boron-11 nuclei by colliding a laser-accelerated proton beam with a laser-generated boron plasma. We report proton- boron reaction rates that are orders of magnitude higher than those reported previously. Beyond fusion, our approach demonstrates a new means for exploring low-energy nuclear reactions such as those that occur in astrophysical plasmas and related environments. 1 LULI, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, CEA, UPMC; Palaiseau 91128, France. 2 CEA, DAM, DIF, Arpajon F-91297, France. 3 Department of Physics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0081, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to C.L. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 4:2506 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3506 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3506 nertial confinement fusion research over the past 40 years Results has been focused on the laser-driven reaction of deuterium Experimental set-up. -
The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion L
The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion L. J. Reinders The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion 123 L. J. Reinders Panningen, The Netherlands ISBN 978-3-030-64343-0 ISBN 978-3-030-64344-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64344-7 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland When you are studying any matter or considering any philosophy, ask yourself only what are the facts and what is the truth that the facts bear out. -
New New Energy
Cleantech.org Webinar Series NEW NEW ENERGY September 20, 2012 Dr. Edward Beardsworth Why we are here Current energy sources all have drawbacks and limitations: (fossil, solar, geothermal, nuclear, biomass, wind, oceans) We’re always looking for something new & better. We need and want (new) sources (aka “holy grails”) which are: 1. Cheap, 2. Clean and 3. Inexhaustible. Today -- an overview of what’s being looked at for: NEW NEW Sources of Energy 2 Outline NEW NEW ENERGY I. Breakthroughs -- ”Accepted Science” II. Breakthroughs -- "Not Accepted Science” -- The fun stuff Goal 1: Greater awareness of the range of stuff being worked on. Goal 2: Provide a deeper understanding of underlying science. 3 The Presenter’s Background Dr. Edward Beardsworth Energy Technology Advisors PhD in Physics from Rutgers University Brookhaven National Lab -- interdisciplinary analyses of energy systems during the first energy crisis of the 1970s. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Jane Capital Partners LLC, Advisor to Nth Power, Garage Technology Ventures, the Cleantech Group, Cleantech Open, and many startups. UFTO program, providing technology scouting to 30 of the top utility R&D and corporate venture arms. Technical Director, The Hub Lab, a stealth R&D program funding revolutionary energy technologies. 4 The Presenter’s Background The Hub Lab a stealth grant program funding R&D in revolutionary energy technologies. • Two years of operation 2008-2010 • 7 small grants (the “Patron” model) • Specific (and restrictive) criteria: – Primary energy sources – New Science, not incremental. – “Scientific method” / ”rigor” / ”people” – Non-establishment actors more than welcome Grants made: • Anomalies in Energetics of a Magnetostrictive Alloy (2nd Law) • Semiconductor MEMS device (2nd Law) • Non-Semiconductor PV (2 projects...both raised further funds) • Fluid Dynamics without Numerical Simulation Successful.