Bad Credit Small Business Based on 2010 Active Business License Data
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rbgh-Free” Momentum Building in U.S
“rbGH-Free” Momentum Building in U.S. Creamery Assn. of Oregon declared that its prized cheeses would no longer contain milk from Posilac- injected cows. Tillamook’s leadership saw sales of the co-op’s pre-eminent branded cheeses impacted by consumer concerns about rbGH. After the Tillamook co-op board of directors announced a “rbGH-Free” policy for its cheeses, then Posilac’s manufacturer—Monsanto—tried to disrupt the co- op’s membership. * In the summer 2006, Alpenrose Dairy (Redmond, Oregon) became completely “rbGH- More and more U.S. dairy processors are responding to consumer Free”. concerns by selling “rbGH-Free” dairy products. This trend was * In December 2005, Darigold’s Seattle, building fast, even before recent reports that rbGH–related hormones Washington's fluid milk supply went “rbGH-Free”. in milk were causing increased multiple human births. Darigold (formerly operating as West Farm) is mov- ing step-by-step, according to Rick North. In by Pete Hardin Nutrition, where author Dr. Gary Steinman reports February 2006, Darigold shifted production of its that a secondary hormone related to “Posilac” injec- Increased consumer demand for “rbGH-Free” yogurt to a “rbGH-Free” plant. tions—Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1), may dairy products is driving more dairy processors to be causing up to a five-fold increase in births of require their raw milk supplies contain no milk from twins in milk-drinking women in the U.S. Global hospital wellness group: anti-rbGH dairy farms using Monsanto’s synthetic, milk-stim- ulating cow growth hormone—“Posilac”. Rick North reports another key organization is Meatrix 2 video targets factory dairies/rbGH involved with the “anti-rbGH” effort is an interna- Some raw milk marketers are absorbing higher tional group—Health Care Without Harm. -
Document Analysis Questions
Captain John L. Anderson Document Analysis Instructions (2 image analysis and 2 SOAPS document analysis tools) Document Instructions Biography Read aloud, highlight significant information (who, what, when, and where) Document 1 How many steamboats? Anderson Steamboat Co. Ferry Schedule How many sailings? How many places does it travel? What does this document say about the Lake Washington steamboat business? What does this document say about the people who used the steamboats? What does this document say about transportation in general? Document 2 Complete image analysis graphic organizer Photograph of Anderson Shipyards 1908 Document 3 Complete image analysis graphic organizer Photograph of Anderson Shipyards 1917 Document 4 Complete SOAPS document analysis graphic organizer News article from Lake Washing- ton Reflector 1918 Document 5 Complete SOAPS document analysis graphic organizer News article from East Side Jour- nal 1919 How did the lowering of Lake Summarize all of the evidence you found in the documents. Washington impact Captain Anderson? Positive Negative Ferry Fay Burrows Document Analysis Instructions (2 image analysis and 3 SOAPS document analysis tools) Documents Instructions Biography Read aloud, highlight significant information (who, what, when, and where) Document 1 1. Why did Captain Burrows start a boat house? Oral History of Homer Venishnick Grandson of Ferry Burrows 2. How did he make money with the steam boat? 3. What fueled this ship? 4. What routes did Capt. Burrows take the steamboat to earn money? 5. What happened to the steamboat business when the lake was lowered? 6. What happened to North Renton when the lake was lowered? Document 2 1. What does “driving rafts” mean and how long did it take? Interview with Martha Burrows Hayes 2. -
Our Donors Page 1 of 20 CORPORATIONS, FOUNDATIONS, ORGANIZATIONS, and INDIVIDUALS
Our Donors page 1 of 20 CORPORATIONS, FOUNDATIONS, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS Our Donors Thank you to everyone who made an investment in girls in 2019 by supporting Girl Scouts of Western Washington. The gifts below were made between October 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019. Donors are listed alphabetically. CORPORATIONS, FOUNDATIONS, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS AbbVie Employee Alaska Airlines Mr. & Mrs. Dale Anderson Nora Arendt Engagement Fund Denise Alessi Ann Anderson Mark Armstrong Jessica Abella Sara Alexander Amy Anderson Ellen Aronson Kendra Abernethy Emily Alford Kristen Anderson Raaji Asaithambi David Abrams Sally Alfred Sharon Anderson Masashi Asao Shannon Abrams Mark Allan Ms. Mary Anderson Kristine Ashcraft Divya Abrol Claudia Allard Karrie Anderson Bredstrand Virginelle Ashe Accenture LLP Jenni Allen Ms. Adrienne Anderson- Kelly Ashley Smith Barbara Acevedo Visser Brittany Allen Erin Ashley Kerry Lee Andken Vicki Adams Adrienne Allen AT&T Employee Giving Ms. Jennifer Andress Campaign Rachel Adams Jay Allen Evelyn Andrews Charity Atchison Carol Adams Lisa Allenbaugh Chantey Andrews Martin Atkinson Kristina Adams Sally Allwardt Duff & Marilyn Andrews Jill Aul Kateryna Adams Pamela Almaguer-Bay Virginia Andrews Burdette Michelle Auster Susan Adams-Provost Nicole Aloni Courtney Angeles Kerry Axley Ereisha Addo Lara Alpert Urban Animal AYCO Charitable Foundation Penny Jo Adler Sharia Al-Rashid Mary Ann Ruth Bacha Lea Aemisegger Lea Rachelle Alston Anonymous Hannah Bachelder Martha E. Ahart Amazon Smile Anonymous Jennifer Bachhuber Saher Ahmad Hanan Amer Melissa Aparico Lisa Baer Samantha Aiello American Legion George Morris Post No 129 Janet Aradine Mona Baghdadi Sheryle Aijala Ameriprise Financial Jennifer Aragon Morges Bahru Levy Aitken Brooke Andersen Ann Ardizzone Julia Bai William Aitken Elspeth Baron Anderson Judge Stephanie Arend Brittany Bailey Julie Kane Akhter We hope your gift is acknowledged accurately. -
National Endowment for the Arts Annual Report 1996
TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES: It is my pleasure to transmit herewith the Annual Report of the National Endowment for the Arts for the fiscal year 1996. One measure of a great nation is the vitality of its culture, the dedication of its people to nurturing a climate where creativity can flourish. By support ing our museums and theaters, our dance companies and symphony orches tras, our writers and our artists, the National Endowment for the Arts provides such a climate. Look through this report and you will find many reasons to be proud of our Nation’s cultural life at the end of the 20th century and what it portends for Americans and the world in the years ahead. Despite cutbacks in its budget, the Endowment was able to fund thou sands of projects all across America -- a museum in Sitka, Alaska, a dance company in Miami, Florida, a production of Eugene O’Neill in New York City, a Whisder exhibition in Chicago, and artists in the schools in all 50 states. Millions of Americans were able to see plays, hear concerts, and participate in the arts in their hometowns, thanks to the work of this small agency. As we set priorities for the coming years, let’s not forget the vita! role of the National Endowment for the Arts must continue to play in our national life. The Endowment shows the world that we take pride in American culture here and abroad. It is a beacon, not only of creativity, but of free dom. And let us keep that lamp brightly burning now and for all time. -
Government Affairs Committee Meeting September 10Th & 11Th
Government Affairs Committee Meeting September 10th & 11th, 2013 Washington, D.C. AGENDA Tuesday Sept. 10 Location: Hall of States Building Room 231, 444 North Capitol St. NW, Washington, DC 11:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Gather / Welcome 11:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. Lunch with Political Speaker 12:30 p.m. – 1:45 p.m. Employment / Labor Update (NLRB, Persuader, DOMA) Kara Maciel, Epstein Becker Green Healthcare Update (Employer Delay, Reporting Requirements) Adam Solander, Epstein Becker Green 1:45 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. Break 2:00 p.m. – 2:40 p.m. Patent Trolls Matthew Tanielian, Franklin Square Group 2:40 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Issue Roundup (Interchange, SNAP, Menu Labeling, Etc.) 3:00 p.m. – 3:45 p.m. GMO Briefing Louis Finkel, EVP Grocery Manufactures Association (GMA) 3:45 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Committee Policy Discussion on GMOs 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m. NGA Capitol Hill Reception Featuring 2nd Annual Congressional Best Bagger Contest Location: Rayburn House Office Building B-318 45 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC Wednesday Sept. 11 7:30a.m. – 7:50 a.m. Breakfast Location: NGA’s Offices 1005 North Glebe Road Arlington, VA (near Holiday Inn Hotel Ballston) 7:50 a.m. – 8:45 a.m. Capitol Hill Meetings Preparation / Briefing Primary Hill Meeting Topic: Healthcare 9:45 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Capitol Hill Lobbying Meetings (NGA is coordinating meetings and teams) (approximately) Government Affairs Committee Roster Mr. Darrell Bourne Mr. Michael Erlandson Ragland Bros. Retail Co. SUPERVALU INC. -
From Tent to Temple by Eugene Pease, 1959 and Earlier U
The 120-Year Story of University Temple United Methodist Church (1890–2010) University Temple United Methodist Church 1415 NE 43rd Street Seattle, Washington 98105 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................ i Preface .................................................................................................................. iv 1. How Firm a Foundation ............................................. 1 Methodism on Seattle's Northern Frontier (1) A Growing Congregation's Ambitious Plans (4) “I Will Build My Church” (5) A Walk Through God’s House (8) The Sanctuary Stained Glass Windows (13) A Block-Long Methodist Presence (16) The Education Wing Sander Memorial Chapel The Church Library Where The Money Came From (23) A Brief Financial History The Crisis of 1935 The Memorial and Endowment Funds 2. The Pastors and Staff .................................................. 30 The Preaching Ministry (30) The Music Ministry (57) Religious Education (73) The Church Office (75) 3. The Congregation .......................................................... 79 United Methodist Women (80) A Brief History The Christmas Gift Banquet The Quilting Group The Sewing Group Wesleyan Service Guild/Jennie Fulton Guild Susannah Wesleyan Service Guild Christian Social Relations Fellowship and Service Groups (93) Triple F and Supper Club Young Adult Beacon Club Meriweds/In-Betweeners Temple Two’s/The Collection Methodist Men Organization Temple Men: The Working Methodists -
Legislative Background Brief for the Economic Affairs Interim Committee
Legislative Background Brief for the Economic Affairs Interim Committee 3/12/14 Review of Other States' Milk Policies and Other Background Information for Discussion of Montana's 12-Day Sell-By Rule Prepared by Pat Murdo, Legislative Staff As a subcommittee of the Economic Affairs Committee considers whether to put into statute a directive regarding sale dates for Grade A milk, there are questions of how other states handle milk sales and what the implications may be for changing the sell-by date now in Montana administrative rules. This review also includes background information on Montana's milk pricing history as well as its sell-by dating rule and related information on various parties' concerns. The states in the Table below are among those listed as having date labeling for processed milk or milk products in a September 2013 Natural Resources Defense Council - Harvard Food Law and Policy Clinic Report: "The Dating Game: How Confusing Food Date Labels Lead to Food Waste in America". Some states may have general requirements that include milk, but if milk is not specifically listed, that state is not included here. State Directive California Date labeling is required to inform consumers of the date established by the processor that is most likely to ensure quality, after which the product is normally removed from the shelf. There is no restriction on sales of milk after the listed date. Connecticut Date labeling required regarding a "last sale date", but sales after that date are not restricted for milk. Florida Allows either the date of "manufacture" of the product or the last day the product may be offered for sale. -
History of the Central Area
History of the Central Area Thomas Veith Seattle Historic Preservation Program City of Seattle Department of Neighborhoods 2009 Contents The Central Area Defined p. 3 Preliminaries p. 5 Territorial Period: 1853 – 1889 p. 12 Early Urbanization: 1890 – 1918 p. 25 Between the Wars: 1918 – 1940 p. 49 The Years of Transition: 1940 – 1960 p. 53 Period of Turmoil: 1960 - 1980 p. 63 The Central Area Today p. 85 Bibliography p. 89 Appendix A: Landmarks p. 93 The Central Area Defined Unlike some Seattle neighborhoods, the Central Area has never existed as a political entity separate from the City of Seattle. In addition the Central Area‟s development was not part of a unified real state scheme with coordinated public improvements (such as the Mount Baker community). For these reasons, it has never had official boundaries and various writers describe its extent in various ways. Almost all attempts to describe the neighborhood include a core area bounded by Madison Street on the north, Jackson Street on the south, 15th Avenue on the west, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Way (formerly Empire Way) on the east. In 1975, Nyberg and Steinbrueck identified the eastern boundary of the Central Area as 30th Avenue (more or less), and also included extensions to the north and south of the core area. The extension to the south of Jackson Street was bounded by 30th Avenue (approximately) on the east, Interstate 90 on the south, and the mid-block alley just east of Rainier Avenue South on the west. The extension to the north of Madison Street was bounded on the west by 23rd Avenue, on the east by the Washington Park Arboretum, and extended north to a line just north of East Helen Street marking the boundary between the plats known as the Madison Park Addition and the Hazelwood Addition Supplemental.1 Walt Crowley describes the neighborhood as a “sprawling residential district . -
Outdoor-Industry Jobs a Ground Level Look at Opportunities in the Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Outdoor Recreation Sectors
Outdoor-Industry Jobs A Ground Level Look at Opportunities in the Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Outdoor Recreation Sectors Written by: Dave Wallace, Research Director, Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board Chris Dula, Research Investigator, Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board Randy Smith, IT and Research Specialist, Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board Alan Hardcastle, Senior Research Manager, WSU Energy Program, Washington State University James Richard McCall, Research Assistant, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center (SESRC), Washington State University Thom Allen, Project Manager, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center (SESRC), Washington State University Executive Summary Washington’s Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board (Workforce Board) was tasked by the Legislature to conduct a comprehensive study1 centered on outdoor and field-based employment2 in Washington, which includes a wide range of jobs in the environment, agriculture, natural resources, and outdoor recreation sectors. Certainly, outdoor jobs abound in Washington, with our state’s Understating often has inspiring mountains and beaches, fertile and productive farmland, the effect of undervaluing abundant natural resources, and highly valued natural environment. these jobs and skills, But the existing data does not provide a full picture of the demand for which can mean missed these jobs, nor the skills required to fill them. opportunities for Washington’s workers Digging deeper into existing data and surveying employers in these and employers. sectors could help pinpoint opportunities for Washington’s young people to enter these sectors and find fulfilling careers. This study was intended to assess current—and projected—employment levels across these sectors with a particular focus on science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) oriented occupations that require “mid-level” education and skills. -
STANDING COMMITTEE MINUTES City of Spokane Urban Development Committee 11/13/2017 - FINAL
STANDING COMMITTEE MINUTES City of Spokane Urban Development Committee 11/13/2017 - FINAL Attendance Council President Ben Stuckart, Council Member Mumm, Council Member Karen Stratton, Council Member Laurie Kinnear, Council Member Amber Waldref, Council Member Mike Fagan, Council Member Breean Beggs, Gavin Cooley, Jonathan Mallahan, Andrew Worlock, Hannalee Allers, Nathen Calene, Anna Everano, Jacob Fraley, Jacqui Halvorson, Brian McClatchey, Adam McDaniel, Skyler Oberst, Teri Stripes, Ali Brast, Eldon Brown, Laura Williams Non-City Employees: Karl Otterstrom - STA Approval of Minutes: The approval of the meeting minutes for October was deferred until the December Urban Development Committee Meeting. Agenda Items: 1. Strategic Investments – Council President Stuckart Council President Stuckart briefed the Committee regarding this item. Please see attached briefing paper. 2. Skywalk Permitting Ordinance – Council President Stuckart Council President Stuckart briefed the Committee regarding this item. Please see attached briefing paper and ordinance. 3. Resolution Opposing the House of Representatives Tax Cuts & Jobs “Tax Reform” Bill – Council President Stuckart Council President Stuckart briefed the Committee regarding this item. Please see attached briefing paper and resolution. 4. Briefing on the Monroe Street Business Support Plan – Council Member Mumm Council Member Mumm briefed the Committee regarding this item. 5. Residential Parking Enforcement: discussion – Council Member Stratton Council Member Stratton briefed the Committee regarding this item. This was a discussion item only pertaining to certain regulations regarding parking vehicles on streets and the rules that apply. 6. A Rezone from Residential Single Family to Residential Single Family Compact for the Ivory Abbey near the Perry District – Ali Brast Ali Brast, Development Services Center, Briefed the Committee regarding this item. -
Historic Property Survey Report: Seattle's Neighborhood Commercial
HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT: SEATTLE’S NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS Prepared by: Mimi Sheridan Cultural Resource Specialist Prepared for: City of Seattle Department of Neighborhoods Historic Preservation Program 700 Third Avenue, Seattle WA 98104 November 2002 PROJECT SUMMARY In 2000 the City of Seattle began a multi-year effort to update its inventory of historic resources throughout the city. Existing information, primarily from the 1970s, was out of date and inadequate to meet the challenges of growth management and the threats to the city’s traditional character posed by increasing demand for housing and commercial space. Two building categories and one neighborhood were selected for the initial round of surveys: neighborhood commercial districts, buildings constructed before 1905, and the University District. This report focuses on the methodology and findings of the survey and inventory of Seattle’s neighborhood commercial districts. The project began in the spring of 2001, with development of a work plan, which identified the survey criteria and boundaries. A context statement was then prepared, giving an overview of commercial development patterns throughout the city. Following this, a reconnaissance survey was done, looking at every building in the identified commercial districts. This survey recorded more than 1000 buildings that met the basic criteria of age (built prior to 1962) and architectural integrity. Two hundred of these structures were identified for further research and inclusion in the final inventory. Development patterns and physical characteristics of each neighborhood and of these 200 buildings are summarized here. In addition to this report, the Neighborhood Commercial District inventory includes 200 Historic Property Inventory forms in an electronic database format that will be available to the general public as well as to other city departments. -
Titles of Plats
% JUL \ J!.\!,.,,'! '«»„«' Si TITLES OF PLATS IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON A Corrected and Compared List of Titles to All Plats filed in King County, Washington, as they appear of record on the Plat Books of said County Compiled, compared and certified by N. H. MOORE PUBLISHED BY E. Y. JEFFERY 531 Burke Building - - Seattle & o eye... o IN examining instruments intending to con- * vey property, we frequently find the name or title of Additions inaccurately stated. The following carefully prepared list of titles to all plats as they actually appear on record, has proven of such practical value in our office that we decided to put it in book form, feeling assured it will be appreciated by every one interested in conveying platted property in King County. E. Y. JEFFERY, 531 Burke Building 24.ti65& Flats ,. .. •«a, ^ w i « M location Aabling's First Addition to the City riled Vol. Page of Seattle 24 Nov. 08 17 40 47th. S. W. & Genesee St. Aberfeldy Estate Addition to Seat- j tie "Washington 5 Apr. 90 5 45 Occidental & Henderson. A map showing a tract of land belonging to Robert Abernethy & John R. Kinnear Se attle. W. T 17 May 88 2 139 Tide Flats. Abington Addition to the City of Seattle 10 June 90 6 17 32nd Ave. S. & Juneau St. (Vacated) Abrahams First Addition to Auburn 13 Mar. 12 20 67 Evans St-First St. Abrams' Add. to South Seattle . 4 Jan. 04 11 30 13th. S. & Holden St. Plat of Day's Acre Gardens 26 Feb. 89 3 66 8th.-N.