DOCSLIB.ORG

NRSC-5 RF Mask Compliance: Measurement Methods and Practice April, 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NRSC-5 RF Mask Compliance: Measurement Methods and Practice April, 2009 NRSC GUIDELINE NATIONAL RADIO SYSTEMS COMMITTEE NRSC-G201 NRSC-5 RF Mask Compliance: Measurement Methods and Practice April, 2009 NAB: 1771 N Street, N.W. CEA: 1919 South Eads Street Washington, DC 20036 Arlington, VA 22202 Tel: (202) 429-5356 Fax: (202) 775-4981 Tel: (703) 907-7660 Fax: (703) 907-8113 Co-sponsored by the Consumer Electronics Association and the National Association of Broadcasters http://www.nrscstandards.org NRSC-G201 NOTICE NRSC Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications are designed to serve the public interest through eliminating misunderstandings between manufacturers and purchasers, facilitating interchangeability and improvement of products, and assisting the purchaser in selecting and obtaining with minimum delay the proper product for his particular need. Existence of such Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications shall not in any respect preclude any member or nonmember of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) or the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) from manufacturing or selling products not conforming to such Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications, nor shall the existence of such Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications preclude their voluntary use by those other than CEA or NAB members, whether to be used either domestically or internationally. Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications are adopted by the NRSC in accordance with the NRSC patent policy. By such action, CEA and NAB do not assume any liability to any patent owner, nor do they assume any obligation whatever to parties adopting the Standard, Guideline, Report or other technical publication. This Guideline does not purport to address all safety problems associated with its use or all applicable regulatory requirements. It is the responsibility of the user of this Guideline to establish appropriate safety and health practices and to determine the applicability of regulatory limitations before its use. Published by CONSUMER ELECTRONICS ASSOCIATION Technology & Standards Department 1919 S. Eads St. Arlington, VA 22202 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Science and Technology Department 1771 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 ©2009 CEA & NAB. All rights reserved. This document is available free of charge via the NRSC website at www.nrscstandards.org. Republication or further distribution of this document, in whole or in part, requires prior permission of CEA or NAB. Page 2 NRSC-G201 FOREWORD The NRSC-5 in-band/on-channel (IBOC) Digital Radio Broadcasting Standard specifies IBOC systems for both the AM and FM bands, including detailed specification of the parameters which must be met by the radio frequency (RF) signal which is ultimately broadcast by an IBOC facility. The most common graphical expression of some of these parameters is the so-called “RF mask” which can be thought of as a template within which the IBOC RF signal must fit. Given the variety of transmission facility configurations suitable for IBOC signal generation as well as the need to characterize IBOC RF signals by both equipment manufacturers (during construction and testing of IBOC transmission equipment) and broadcasters, various methods must be utilized to determine whether an RF signal is compliant with the RF masks specified by NRSC-5. The purpose of the NRSC Guideline is to provide background information as well as detailed instructions on the best methods and practices for determining RF mask compliance for the situations most likely to be encountered by equipment manufacturers and broadcasters. The information contained in this NRSC Guideline is the work of the IBOC Standards Development Working Group (ISDWG), a subgroup of the Digital Radio Broadcasting (DRB) Subcommittee of the NRSC. At the time of first adoption of this Guideline, the ISDWG was chaired by Dom Bordonaro, Cox Radio, and the DRB Subcommittee was co-chaired by Mike Bergman, Kenwood, Americas Corporation, and Andy Laird, Journal Broadcast Group. The NRSC chairman at the time of adoption of NRSC-G201 was Milford Smith, Greater Media, Inc. The NRSC is jointly sponsored by the Consumer Electronics Association and the National Association of Broadcasters. It serves as an industry-wide standards-setting body for technical aspects of terrestrial over-the-air radio broadcasting systems in the United States. Page 3 NRSC-G201 CONTENTS 1 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................................7 2 REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................................7 2.1 NORMATIVE REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................7 2.2 INFORMATIVE REFERENCES ............................................................................................................7 2.3 SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................8 2.4 DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................................................9 3 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................11 4 HYBRID FM IBOC MASK COMPLIANCE MEASUREMENTS.........................................................12 4.1 OVERVIEW...................................................................................................................................12 4.2 MODULATING SIGNALS AND COMPLIANCE MEASUREMENTS..............................................................13 4.3 OPERATIONAL FACILITIES..............................................................................................................13 4.3.1 Common-line facilities ...........................................................................................................15 4.3.1.1 Measurement location and sampling method .............................................................................15 4.3.1.2 Instrument configuration .............................................................................................................16 4.3.1.3 Spurious emissions.....................................................................................................................16 4.3.2 Separate-line facilities ...........................................................................................................18 4.3.2.1 Measurement location and sampling method .............................................................................18 4.3.2.2 Instrument configuration .............................................................................................................19 4.3.2.3 Spurious emissions.....................................................................................................................19 4.4 TROUBLESHOOTING (VARIOUS OUT-OF-SPEC CONDITIONS AND POSSIBLE REMEDIES).......................20 4.4.1 Pre-correction and clipping discussion..................................................................................21 4.4.2 Evaluating ingress of unwanted signals ................................................................................21 4.4.3 Error rate testing....................................................................................................................23 5 HYBRID AM IBOC MASK COMPLIANCE MEASUREMENTS ........................................................24 5.1 OVERVIEW...................................................................................................................................24 5.2 OPERATIONAL FACILITIES..............................................................................................................25 5.2.1 Directional and non-directional antenna systems .................................................................26 5.2.2 Measurement locations and sampling methods....................................................................26 5.2.2.1 Field measurement .....................................................................................................................26 5.2.2.2 True power measurement at transmitter.....................................................................................27 5.2.2.3 Impact of pattern bandwidth........................................................................................................28 5.2.2.4 Directional coupler measurements not for compliance assessment ...........................................28 5.2.3 Analog signal and digital sidebands......................................................................................28 5.2.4 Spurious emissions ...............................................................................................................29 5.2.5 AM IBOC mask compliance measurement procedures ........................................................30 5.2.5.1 Additional legacy mask on full hybrid signal measurement.........................................................31 5.2.5.2 Harmonics...................................................................................................................................31 5.2.5.3 Testing for instrument-induced harmonic and spurious content..................................................31 5.3 TROUBLESHOOTING (VARIOUS OUT-OF-SPEC CONDITIONS AND POSSIBLE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IBOC AM Transmission Specification Ibiquity Digital Corporation
    IBOC AM Transmission Specification November 2001 iBiquity Digital Corporation 8865 Stanford Boulevard, Suite 202 20 Independence Boulevard Columbia, Maryland 21045 Warren, New Jersey 07059 AM Transmission Specification © 2001 iBiquity Digital Corporation 11/08/01 Doc. No. SY_TN_5010 Rev. 01 (410) 872-1530 (908) 580-7000 Table of Contents Contents 1 SCOPE ..............................................................................................................................................................1 2 ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND CONVENTIONS .................................................................................1 2.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................1 2.2 Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................................................1 2.3 Presentation Conventions ..........................................................................................................................1 2.4 Mathematical Symbols ..............................................................................................................................1 2.4.1 Variable Naming Conventions ..............................................................................................................1 2.4.2 Arithmetic Operators.............................................................................................................................1 2.5
    [Show full text]
  • On the Spectral and Power Requirements for Ultra-Wideband Transmission
    MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES http://www.merl.com On the Spectral and Power Requirements for Ultra-Wideband Transmission Hongsan Sheng, Philip Orlik, Alexander M. Haimovich, Leonard J. Cimini, Jr, Jinyun Zhang TR2003-66 December 2003 Abstract UWB systems based on impulse radio have the potential to provide very high data rates over short distances. In this paper, a new pulse shape is presented that satisfies the FCC spectral mask. Using this pulse, the link budget is calculated to quantify the relationship between data rate and distance. It is shown that UWB can be a good candidate for high rate transmission over short ranges, with the capability for reliably transmitting 100 Mbps over distances at about 10 meters. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) This work may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part for any commercial purpose. Permission to copy in whole or in part without payment of fee is granted for nonprofit educational and research purposes provided that all such whole or partial copies include the following: a notice that such copying is by permission of Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.; an acknowledgment of the authors and individual contributions to the work; and all applicable portions of the copyright notice. Copying, reproduction, or republishing for any other purpose shall require a license with payment of fee to Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright c Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc., 2003 201 Broadway, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 MERLCoverPageSide2 On the Spectral and Power Requirements for Ultra-Wideband Transmission Hongsan Sheng† Philip Orlik‡ Alexander M. Haimovich† Leonard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Bandwidth-Efficient Modulations Summary of Definition, Implementation, and Performance
    Report Concerning Space Data System Standards BANDWIDTH-EFFICIENT MODULATIONS SUMMARY OF DEFINITION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND PERFORMANCE INFORMATIONAL REPORT CCSDS 413.0-G-2 GREEN BOOK October 2009 Report Concerning Space Data System Standards BANDWIDTH-EFFICIENT MODULATIONS SUMMARY OF DEFINITION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND PERFORMANCE INFORMATIONAL REPORT CCSDS 413.0-G-2 GREEN BOOK October 2009 CCSDS REPORT CONCERNING BANDWIDTH-EFFICIENT MODULATIONS AUTHORITY Issue: Informational Report, Issue 2 Date: October 2009 Location: Washington, DC, USA This document has been approved for publication by the Management Council of the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) and reflects the consensus of technical panel experts from CCSDS Member Agencies. The procedure for review and authorization of CCSDS Reports is detailed in the Procedures Manual for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. This document is published and maintained by: CCSDS Secretariat Space Communications and Navigation Office, 7L70 Space Operations Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001, USA CCSDS 413.0-G-2 Page i October 2009 CCSDS REPORT CONCERNING BANDWIDTH-EFFICIENT MODULATIONS FOREWORD This Report contains technical material to supplement the CCSDS recommendations for the standardization of modulation methods for high symbol rate transmissions generated by CCSDS Member Agencies. Through the process of normal evolution, it is expected that expansion, deletion, or modification of this document may occur. This Report is therefore subject to CCSDS document management and change control procedures, which are defined in the Procedures Manual for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Current versions of CCSDS documents are maintained at the CCSDS Web site: http://www.ccsds.org/ Questions relating to the contents or status of this document should be addressed to the CCSDS Secretariat at the address indicated on page i.
    [Show full text]
  • New Methods for HD Radio™ Crest Factor Reduction and Pre-Correction
    New Methods for HD Radio Crest Factor Reduction and Pre-correction April 12, 2015 NAB Show 2015 Featuring GatesAir’s Tim Anderson Kevin Berndsen Radio Product & Business Senior Signal Development Manager Processing Engineer Copyright © 2015 GatesAir, Inc. All rights reserved. New Methods for HD Radio Crest Factor Reduction and Pre-correction Timothy Anderson, CPBE Radio Product Development Manager, GatesAir Kevin Berndsen, MSEE Senior Signal Processing Engineer, GatesAir NAB 2015 Broadcast Engineering Conference Crest Factor and Intermodulation Distortion The biggest challenge in amplifying orthogonal frequency-division multiplexed (OFDM) waveforms used for HD Radio and all other digital radio formats is: a) High Crest Factor of multiple carriers. b) Intermodulation products of multiple carriers Crest Factor vs. Peak-Average Power Ratio . Crest factor is a measure of a waveform, such as alternating current, sound or complex RF waveform, . As a power ratio, PAPR is showing the ratio of peak values to the normally expressed in average value. decibels (dB). Crest Factor is defined as the peak . When expressed in decibels, amplitude of the waveform divided by Crest Factor and PAPR are the RMS value of the waveform equivalent . The peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is the peak amplitude squared (giving the peak power) divided by the RMS value squared (giving the average power). It is the square of the crest factor Peak Distribution . The Hybrid HD Radio™ system uses up to 534 Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexed (OFDM) subcarriers modulated at equally spaced frequencies and 90 degrees to one another. Statistically, with this number of orthogonally opposed subcarriers, there can and will occasionally be very high amplitude peaks due to vector summation of the carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Frequency Considerations for Telemetry
    Telemetry Standards, IRIG Standard 106-15 (Part 1), Appendix A, July 2015 APPENDIX A Frequency Considerations for Telemetry Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... A-iii 1.0 Purpose ...................................................................................................................... A-1 2.0 Scope ......................................................................................................................... A-1 2.1 Definitions........................................................................................................... A-1 2.2 Modulation methods ........................................................................................... A-2 2.3 Other Notations ................................................................................................... A-2 3.0 Authorization to Use a Telemetry System ................................................................ A-2 3.1 RF Spectrum Support Certification .................................................................... A-3 3.2 Frequency Authorization .................................................................................... A-4 4.0 Frequency Usage Guidance ...................................................................................... A-4 4.1 Minimum Frequency Separation ......................................................................... A-4 4.2 Alternative method for determining frequency separation ................................
    [Show full text]
  • EN 302 623 V0.3.2 (2008-05) Harmonized European Standard (Telecommunications Series)
    Draft ETSI EN 302 623 V0.3.2 (2008-05) Harmonized European Standard (Telecommunications series) Broadband Wireless Access Systems (BWA) in the 3 400 MHz to 3 800 MHz frequency band; Mobile Terminal Stations; Harmonized EN covering the essential requirements of article 3.2 of the R&TTE Directive 2 Draft ETSI EN 302 623 V0.3.2 (2008-05) Reference DEN/BRAN-0060002 Keywords access, broadband, BWA, mobile, terminal ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88 Important notice Individual copies of the present document can be downloaded from: http://www.etsi.org The present document may be made available in more than one electronic version or in print. In any case of existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions, the reference version is the Portable Document Format (PDF). In case of dispute, the reference shall be the printing on ETSI printers of the PDF version kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at http://portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services: http://portal.etsi.org/chaircor/ETSI_support.asp Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Re-Growth Was Coined to Describe Intermodulation Products Generated When a Digital Transmitter Is Added to an Analog Transmission System
    Shively Labs® Spectral Regrowth Abstract Intermodulation products, or spurs, can develop within the analog and digital transmitters in combined systems using high-level injection. In some cases, spurs can result in sub-optimal signal quality or even cause stations to interfere with each other’s signals. The term spectral re-growth was coined to describe intermodulation products generated when a digital transmitter is added to an analog transmission system. In the early days of digital implementation, external filtering was often used to eliminate or reduce interference. As the technology has evolved, however, only subtle adjustments to the system, such as the addition of a fine-match- ing transformer to the dummy load, have proven necessary to reduce distortion and interference to meet the FCC’s digital FM mask. There are two sets of spurs that have to be dealt with. The first set of spurs is generated within a digital transmitter as the two sidebands interact. The second set of spurs is also generated in the digital transmitter and is a product of each digital sideband combining with the analog signal. The signal level of these spurs is a function of the isola- tion between the analog and digital transmitters. This paper provides a basic overview of how high-level injectors work, their weaknesses, and how they can best be optimized, as is essential to the design, installation, tuning and operation of a modern analog/digital FM station. Document No. tb-spectral_regrowth (150320) A Division of Howell Laboratories, Inc., P. O. Box 389, Bridgton, Maine 04009 USA www.shively.com (207) 647-3327 1-888-SHIVELY Fax: (207)647-8273 [email protected] An Employee-Owned Company Certifi ed to ISO-9001 Spectral Regrowth The FCC digital mask The characteristic FM analog/digital mask is shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidimensional Waveform Shaping in Multicarrier Systems Ertugrul Guvenkaya University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 11-20-2015 Multidimensional Waveform Shaping in Multicarrier Systems Ertugrul Guvenkaya University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Communication Commons, and the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Scholar Commons Citation Guvenkaya, Ertugrul, "Multidimensional Waveform Shaping in Multicarrier Systems" (2015). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5958 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Multidimensional Waveform Shaping in Multicarrier Systems by Ertu˘grulG¨uvenkaya A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Electrical Engineering College of Engineering University of South Florida Major Professor: H¨useyinArslan, Ph.D. Richard D. Gitlin, Sc.D. Nasir Ghani, Ph.D. Yao Liu, Ph.D. Erdem Bala, Ph.D. Date of Approval: September 23, 2015 Keywords: Artificial noise, asymmetric pulse shaping, OFDM, PAPR reduction, sidelobe suppression Copyright c 2015, Ertu˘grulG¨uvenkaya DEDICATION To our martyrs. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. H¨useyin Arslan for his guidance, encouragement, and support throughout my study. I wish to thank Dr. Richard D. Gitlin, Dr. Nasir Ghani, Dr. Yao Liu, and Dr. Erdem Bala for serving in my committee and for offering valuable suggestions. I hope to be able to benefit from their profound knowledge and experience in the future, as well.
    [Show full text]
  • EVM-Constrained and Mask-Compliant MIMO
    1 EVM-Constrained and Mask-Compliant MIMO-OFDM Spectral Precoding Shashi Kant, Student Member, IEEE, Mats Bengtsson, Senior Member, IEEE, Gabor Fodor, Senior Member, IEEE, Bo Goransson,¨ Member, IEEE, and Carlo Fischione, Senior Member, IEEE the sinc functions of the OFDM signal [4]. The OOBE must Abstract—Spectral precoding is a promising technique to sup- be adequately suppressed since high OOBE causes significant press out-of-band emissions and comply with leakage constraints interference to the neighbouring adjacent channels. In practice, over adjacent frequency channels and with mask requirements on the unwanted emissions. However, spectral precoding may all OFDM systems are designed to comply not only with distort the original data vector, which is formally expressed as OOBE requirements, in terms of adjacent channel leakage the error vector magnitude (EVM) between the precoded and ratio (ACLR) and spectral emission mask, but also in-band original data vectors. Notably, EVM has a deleterious impact requirements, in terms of error vector magnitude (EVM) and on the performance of multiple-input multiple-output orthogonal other signal demodulation/detection requirements [5]. Simply, frequency division multiplexing-based systems. In this paper we propose a novel spectral precoding approach which constrains the EVM describes the distortion/noise incurred to the useful the EVM while complying with the mask requirements. We first (transmit) symbols and ACLR represents the amount of un- formulate and solve the EVM-unconstrained mask-compliant desired power that exists in the neighbouring carriers relative spectral precoding problem, which serves as a springboard to to the desired carrier power—the detailed description of these the design of two EVM-constrained spectral precoding schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Fcc's Tv White Space Regulations
    [STANDARDS] Ramachandran Ramjee Microsoft Research India Sumit Roy University of Washington USA Krishna Chintalapudi Microsoft Research USA Editor: Michelle Gong A CRITIQUE OF FCC’S TV WHITE SPACE REGULATIONS roadband access constitutes the “oxygen” for the Internet Era, to which end, the issue of spectrum management is foundational. In this position paper, we present an overview Bof FCC’s pioneering work framing TV white space rules that allows unlicensed access by secondary users while protecting licensed primary users. The core contribution of this paper is an in-depth analysis of FCC’s TV white space regulations (often treated as a global template). We argue that FCC’s current white space regulations does not achieve the desired balance between effectively promoting unlicensed secondary access and providing adequate protection of the primary. As more countries around the world look at framing white space regulations, we argue for incorporating a more flexible design that can catalyze a white space device ecosystem to flourish, similar to Wi-Fi. INTRODUCTION network services, based on the operators Broadly speaking, spectrum allocations belief that exclusive rights to spectrum can be classified under two principles/ enables them to offer/tailor desired approaches: services, as well as optimize the network/ delivery mechanisms so as to extract a) granting of exclusive licenses, usually via maximum revenue. The unlicensed model a suitably designed auction mechanism, is used by standards, such as Wi-Fi, to operators for an explicitly identified where the fundamental issue is managing purpose of service (that may not be interference, specifically a) secondary changed) and unlicensed interference to primary b) setting aside “unlicensed bands” for licensed users and b) interference between technology neutral usage, whereby unlicensed secondary users.
    [Show full text]
  • EN 302 063 V1.1.1 (2003-01) European Standard (Telecommunications Series)
    ETSI EN 302 063 V1.1.1 (2003-01) European Standard (Telecommunications series) Fixed Radio Systems; Multipoint equipment; Multipoint digital radio systems operating in the 31,0 GHz to 33,4 GHz (32 GHz) frequency range 2 ETSI EN 302 063 V1.1.1 (2003-01) Reference DEN/TM-04116 Keywords FWA, multipoint, radio, DFRS ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88 Important notice Individual copies of the present document can be downloaded from: http://www.etsi.org The present document may be made available in more than one electronic version or in print. In any case of existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions, the reference version is the Portable Document Format (PDF). In case of dispute, the reference shall be the printing on ETSI printers of the PDF version kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at http://portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp If you find errors in the present document, send your comment to: [email protected] Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Out-Of-Band Emission and In-Band Interference for Precoded and Classical OFDM Systems
    An analysis of out-of-band emission and in-band interference for precoded and classical OFDM systems Medhat Mohamad∗, Rickard Nilsson∗ and Jaap van de Beek∗† ∗Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering Lulea˚ University of Technology, SE–97187, Lulea,˚ Sweden. {medhat.mohamad, rickard.o.nilsson, jaap.vandeBeek}@ltu.se †Huawei Technologies, Sweden {jaap.vandebeek}@huawei.com Abstract—In this paper we present analytical expressions for OFDM symbol to zero. In [5], the main goal is to introduce the out-of-band (OOB) emission and in-band interference of nulls at well chosen frequencies in the OFDM spectrum. In two different OOB suppressed OFDM-systems; classical low-pass [7] the constraints on the precoding matrix suggested in [5] filtered and precoded. Then, we analytically compare their per- are relaxed. In [8], the precoder is designed to limit the OOB formance in terms of OOB emission suppression and introduced emission suppressed below a particular power mask. level of in-band interference. We analyse the fact that the in- band interference introduced by the filter depends on the length A comparison between the different schemes regarding the of the cyclic prefix as well as the behavior of the channel while OOB emission suppression is carried out [4]. Yet, to our that of the precoded OFDM does not. The analysis confirms that knowledge, no comparison at the level of the in-band inter- edged subcarriers suffer higher in-band interference than central ference introduced by the different schemes has been carried subcarriers. Moreover, frequency precoders, for a specific choice out. of notching frequencies, can outperform time precoders.
    [Show full text]