A Critique of Fcc's Tv White Space Regulations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Critique of Fcc's Tv White Space Regulations [STANDARDS] Ramachandran Ramjee Microsoft Research India Sumit Roy University of Washington USA Krishna Chintalapudi Microsoft Research USA Editor: Michelle Gong A CRITIQUE OF FCC’S TV WHITE SPACE REGULATIONS roadband access constitutes the “oxygen” for the Internet Era, to which end, the issue of spectrum management is foundational. In this position paper, we present an overview Bof FCC’s pioneering work framing TV white space rules that allows unlicensed access by secondary users while protecting licensed primary users. The core contribution of this paper is an in-depth analysis of FCC’s TV white space regulations (often treated as a global template). We argue that FCC’s current white space regulations does not achieve the desired balance between effectively promoting unlicensed secondary access and providing adequate protection of the primary. As more countries around the world look at framing white space regulations, we argue for incorporating a more flexible design that can catalyze a white space device ecosystem to flourish, similar to Wi-Fi. INTRODUCTION network services, based on the operators Broadly speaking, spectrum allocations belief that exclusive rights to spectrum can be classified under two principles/ enables them to offer/tailor desired approaches: services, as well as optimize the network/ delivery mechanisms so as to extract a) granting of exclusive licenses, usually via maximum revenue. The unlicensed model a suitably designed auction mechanism, is used by standards, such as Wi-Fi, to operators for an explicitly identified where the fundamental issue is managing purpose of service (that may not be interference, specifically a) secondary changed) and unlicensed interference to primary b) setting aside “unlicensed bands” for licensed users and b) interference between technology neutral usage, whereby unlicensed secondary users. FCC Part 15 compliant devices do not need a license rules [FCC 01-58] that govern unlicensed to operate (but must nevertheless be bands have mostly focused on “transmit certified), akin to a public “commons.” power” centric rules to ensure limited interference from secondary unlicensed The first scenario conforms to a single users to primary users (e.g. limits on primary network in the licensed band average transmit power over the band, whereas the latter maps to multiple (co- maximum power spectral density and on located) networks. The exclusive license out-of-band emission limit using transmit model is the operative one for all cellular spectral mask) while encouraging the use bigstockphoto.com Photo, 20 GetMobile January 2016 | Volume 20, Issue 1 [STANDARDS] of “etiquettes,” such as listen before talk TV WHITE SPACES & RULES above 512 MHz (above TV channel 20) (LBT) for managing interference between OF “COGNITIVE USAGE” if those available channels are adjacent to unlicensed secondary users.1 After the transition from analog to digital occupied TV channels. Fixed TVBDs can Spectrum license auctions, such as TV broadcasting, TV broadcast in the U.S. utilize an external antenna up to 30 meters those by the FCC, typically generate several is limited to channels 2-51; the unused above the ground and are allowed a higher billion USD as a one-time revenue to spectrum within channels 2-51 at any transmitter power of 1W or up to 4W EIRP the U.S. treasury (e.g. 2006 auction of 90 location is designated as TV White Spaces with a 6 dBi gain antenna. These devices MHz netted USD 14 billion [BULOW]). (TVWS). The FCC, in a series of pioneering are not allowed to be located at a site where However, a multibillion dollar industry notices and regulations starting from 2004, the ground height above the average terrain has also grown in the use of “unlicensed” effectively allowed Part 15 like (unlicensed) (HAAT) exceeds 250 meters, so use in hilly spectrum [THANKI 1]; a recent analysis operation in TV White Space frequencies areas may be restricted. suggests that the value generated from subject to cognitive usage rules for protect- unlicensed spectrum use is $140 billion ing the primary users, i.e. requiring un- Personal/Portable Devices: Personal/ per annum in the U.S. alone [THANKI licensed or secondary TV Band (TVBD) portable device transmissions are restricted 2]. Because users of unlicensed spectrum devices to incorporate ‘‘smart radio’’ features to available channels in the frequency bands enjoy economies of scale and do not pay to protect the primary users [FCC 04-113, 512‐608 MHz (TV channels 21‐36) and for expensive spectrum licenses, unlicensed FCC 08-260, FCC 10-174, FCC 14-144]. 614‐698 MHz (TV channels 38‐51). These networks typically offer a less expensive and devices are limited to a maximum EIRP of more readily deployable form of wireless General Requirements on TV Band 100mW or 40mW if the device is operating service than licensed spectrum – albeit Devices (TVBDs) [FCC 14-144] on a channel adjacent to an occupied TV at a trade-off for quality of service and The unlicensed TVBDs were classified channel. protection from interference. into two functional categories: a) lower Wi-Fi carried about 70% of all mobile power ‘‘personal/portable’’ devices, such as Mode I Personal/Portable Devices: Internet data traffic in 2014 and Wi-Fi’s Wi-Fi–like cards in laptop computers and A Mode I device is not required to use share is expected to rise to 85% by 2018 b) higher power ‘‘fixed’’ devices that could geo‐location or have access to the TV [WI-FI-TRENDS]. The global success of be used to provide services such as 802.22 bands database. Instead, it obtains a list of Wi-Fi even with the relatively small ranges Base station/CPEs providing a backhaul for available channels from either a fixed or of frequency allocated for unlicensed use broadband client access. Mode II personal/portable device. A Mode has led many spectrum advocates to press The personal/portable TVBDs were I device may not initiate a network nor for more unlicensed spectrum, leading to a further sub-divided into Mode I and Mode may it provide a list of available channels more equitably mixed ecosystem of licensed II operations with somewhat different rules to another device. and unlicensed approaches that combines applying as detailed below. Fixed devices are the relative strengths of both. While the intended to operate at a fixed location (e.g. Mode II Personal/Portable Devices: A original notion of (pure) unlicensed usage an outdoor access point) while personal/ Mode II device uses its own geo‐location corresponds to a “commons” scenario portable devices can operate in unspecified capability and access to the TV bands where all networks are treated on-par and locations based on user mobility. A (second- database, either through a direct connection must accept interference from each other, ary) network can only be initiated by a fixed to the Internet or through an indirect rule making can readily accommodate or Mode II TVBD, not a Mode I TVBD. connection by way of a fixed TVBD or provisioning of priority for any sub-set another Mode II TVBD. A Mode II device operating in co- or adjacent channels.2 Fixed Devices: Fixed devices can initiate may select a channel itself and initiate and This is precisely the notion of Cognitive a network by sending enabling signals operate as part of a network of TVBDs, White Spaces (WS), whereby the identified to one or more fixed and/or personal/ transmitting to and receiving from one or primary services are to be protected from portable TVBDs. Fixed devices can use any more fixed or personal/portable TVDBs. unlicensed usage, as we discuss next. available WS frequency but may not operate It may provide a list of available channels to a Mode I device. 1 This is in contrast to EU regulations that mandate LBT use in unlicensed spectrum. 2 For example, in the upper 5 GHz band, Wi-Fi devices share the band with military radar subject to Interference Avoidance Methods: Channel the condition that the Wi-Fi devices are capable of spectrum sensing and if radar is detected, the availability for a TVBD is determined based unlicensed user must immediately vacate the channel. upon geo‐location and database access but January 2016 | Volume 20, Issue 1 GetMobile 21 [STANDARDS] spectrum sensing can also be used. For fixed a handful of small startups [TVBD]. The and Mode II devices, geographic coordinates integration of embedded WS devices into need to be determined to an accuracy of consumer portable/handheld devices has +/‐ 50 meters by utilizing incorporated not yet occurred, stalling the onset of any geo‐location capability. Fixed devices that virtuous market cycle based on increasing are professionally installed do not need adoption volume. As a result, the future geo‐location capability if the coordinates of WS technology under the regulations are provided at time of installation. All proposed by FCC looks bleak. devices must register their coordinates with In this section, building upon some the database and must re‐establish their preliminary observations in [TCCN 2015], position each time it is activated from a we provide an in-depth assessment for this power‐off condition. Fixed devices shall state-of-affairs and suggest alternate designs access and update their database at least that could allow a large white space device once every day and personal/portable device FIGURE 1. One of the first FCC-approved white ecosystem to develop, similar to that of must check its location at least once every spaces device is a 1.5-lb radio from KTS Wireless. Wi-Fi. 60 seconds. Operation on a channel must cease immediately if the database indicates ISSUES WITH FCC TVWS RULINGS the channel is no longer available. Mode 1. Database showing little or no white II personal/portable devices also must incumbents [SHELL 11].
Recommended publications
  • IBOC AM Transmission Specification Ibiquity Digital Corporation
    IBOC AM Transmission Specification November 2001 iBiquity Digital Corporation 8865 Stanford Boulevard, Suite 202 20 Independence Boulevard Columbia, Maryland 21045 Warren, New Jersey 07059 AM Transmission Specification © 2001 iBiquity Digital Corporation 11/08/01 Doc. No. SY_TN_5010 Rev. 01 (410) 872-1530 (908) 580-7000 Table of Contents Contents 1 SCOPE ..............................................................................................................................................................1 2 ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND CONVENTIONS .................................................................................1 2.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................1 2.2 Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................................................1 2.3 Presentation Conventions ..........................................................................................................................1 2.4 Mathematical Symbols ..............................................................................................................................1 2.4.1 Variable Naming Conventions ..............................................................................................................1 2.4.2 Arithmetic Operators.............................................................................................................................1 2.5
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on the Use of Television White Spaces, 2019
    DRAFT GUIDELINES ON THE USE OF TELEVISION WHITE SPACES, 2019 ARRANGEMENT OF GUIDELINES 1. Objectives. 2. Permissible Frequencies of Operation. 3. Authorization Framework for TVWS Operations 4. TVWS Devices - Conducted Power and Conducted Spectral Power Density Limits. 5. TVWS Devices - Antenna Requirements and Height Limits. 6. TVWS Devices - Radiated Power and In-Block EIRP Spectral Density Limits. 7. TVWS Devices - Out-of-Block EIRP Spectral Density Limits. 8. Interference Avoidance Mechanisms. 9. TV Whitespace Database. 10. TV Whitespace Database Administrator. 11. Temporary procedure to authorize operation of operators prior to certification of the TVWS database 12. TVWS Devices Information Display Requirements. 13. Limits on TVWS Operations near International Borders. 14. Definitions. 1 GUIDELINES ON THE USE OF TELEVISION WHITE SPACES In exercise of the powers conferred upon it by sections 70 and 123 (1) of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003 (in these Guidelines referred to as “the Act”), and of all other powers enabling it in that behalf, the NIGERIAN COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (herein referred to as the “Commission”) hereby make the following Guidelines (A) These guidelines provide a framework to enable license-exempt transmitters to operate in the UHF band, which are allocated on a primary basis to the broadcast television service, on frequencies and at locations where the spectrum is either not assigned to licensed services or not in use at particular times, while protecting primary users from receiving harmful interference. (B) These license-exempt radio transmitters will allow for the provision of affordable broadband and Internet access in unserved and underserved areas within Nigeria, and support the development of Internet of Things applications, including agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • TV White Space for Internet Access in the Developing World Tawachi Nyasulu1, Dani Anderson1, David H
    TV White Space for Internet Access in the Developing World Tawachi Nyasulu1, Dani Anderson1, David H. Crawford1, Robert W. Stewart1, Malcolm Brew2 1 Centre for White Space Communications, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. 2 Mawingu Networks, Kenya. [email protected] Abstract In 2013, the University of Strathclyde began working with Microsoft’s 4Afrika programme to create a data communications network in Kenya, providing connectivity and Internet access to a number of rural locations, including schools and health clinics in remote villages. This project has led to the development of Mawingu Networks, a fully licensed internet service provider using “White Space” radio frequencies to enable low cost internet access via renewable powered base stations. Since going live in 2016, the network now has more than 27,000 unique users across a wide geographical area. Despite the fact that universal Internet access is part of the UN’s sustainable development goals, and has been shown to spur social and economic development, a large percentage of people in developing countries do not yet have access. This is often due to a lack of infrastructure, large distances and dispersed populations. This poster presents an overview of TV White Space technologies, with emphasis on our 4Afrika collaboration with Microsoft and Mawingu Networks. In addition, an insight into some recent developments in other African countries (Malawi, Zambia, and Ghana) is presented. What is TV White Space? TVWS Network Architecture Evolution Wireless communication is transmitted using radio spectrum. ‘White Spaces’ are TVWS standards and regulations have transformed the TVWS network architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Tv White Spaces: Managing Spaces Or Better Managing Inefficiencies￿
    TV WHITE SPACES: MANAGING SPACES OR BETTER MANAGING INEFFICIENCIES Cristian Gomez Radiocommunication Bureau International Telecommunication∗ Union 7 [email protected] is paper reviews relevant regulatory aspects concerning the oper- . e text of this article is based ational implementation of Television White Space (TVWS) devices in on the ITU discussion paper of the some parts of the spectrum allocated to TV broadcasting. e term TV same title, presented at the Global Symposium for Regulators , White Spaces usually refers to unoccupied portions of spectrum in the Warsaw, Poland. e full text of VHF/UHF terrestrial television frequency bands in some geographical the discussion paper is available at: areas. Trials and tests are currently underway in several countries and http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/ some commercial applications are emerging, looking at improving the Conferences/GSR/Documents/ utilization of the highly valued UHF spectrum resource through sharing GSR_paper_WhiteSpaces_ Gomez.pdf its use with the primary terrestrial television service. Wireless broad- band applications are the main focus of trials, nonetheless, the usefulness of this highly sought-aer spectrum is also being considered for other applications, such as machine-to-machine communications (MM). e low-power nature of all these alternative wireless applications is being proposed as appropriate for operation under a license-exempt . License-exempt framework regulatory framework, in compliance with technical and operational refers to devices operating on a specications. non-interference/non-protection basis in compliance with technical As the title of this paper suggests, there are dierent approaches and specication and/or band rules considerations currently being reviewed for TV white spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Spectral and Power Requirements for Ultra-Wideband Transmission
    MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES http://www.merl.com On the Spectral and Power Requirements for Ultra-Wideband Transmission Hongsan Sheng, Philip Orlik, Alexander M. Haimovich, Leonard J. Cimini, Jr, Jinyun Zhang TR2003-66 December 2003 Abstract UWB systems based on impulse radio have the potential to provide very high data rates over short distances. In this paper, a new pulse shape is presented that satisfies the FCC spectral mask. Using this pulse, the link budget is calculated to quantify the relationship between data rate and distance. It is shown that UWB can be a good candidate for high rate transmission over short ranges, with the capability for reliably transmitting 100 Mbps over distances at about 10 meters. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) This work may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part for any commercial purpose. Permission to copy in whole or in part without payment of fee is granted for nonprofit educational and research purposes provided that all such whole or partial copies include the following: a notice that such copying is by permission of Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.; an acknowledgment of the authors and individual contributions to the work; and all applicable portions of the copyright notice. Copying, reproduction, or republishing for any other purpose shall require a license with payment of fee to Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright c Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc., 2003 201 Broadway, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 MERLCoverPageSide2 On the Spectral and Power Requirements for Ultra-Wideband Transmission Hongsan Sheng† Philip Orlik‡ Alexander M. Haimovich† Leonard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing City-Wide White-Fi Networks in TV White Spaces
    1 Optimizing City-Wide White-Fi Networks in TV White Spaces Sneihil Gopal∗, Sanjit K. Kaul∗ and Sumit Royy ∗Wireless Systems Lab, IIIT-Delhi, India,yUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA fsneihilg, [email protected], [email protected] F Abstract—White-Fi refers to WiFi deployed in the TV white spaces. Unlike its ISM band counterparts, White-Fi must obey requirements (28) (27) TVTX1 that protect TV reception. As a result, optimization of citywide White- TVRX2 Fi networks faces the challenges of heterogeneous channel availability (28) TVRX1 and link quality, over location. The former is because, at any location, (27) White-Fi Network TV channels in use by TV networks are not available for use by White-Fi. TX2 The latter is because the link quality achievable at a White-Fi receiver is determined by not only its link gain to its transmitter but also by its link gains to TV transmitters and its transmitter’s link gains to TV receivers. In this work, we model the medium access control (MAC) throughput of a White-Fi network. We propose heuristic algorithms to optimize the throughput, given the described heterogeneity. The algorithms assign (27) TVRX power, access probability, and channels to nodes in the network, under 1 the constraint that reception at TV receivers is not compromised. We (27) TVTX evaluate the efficacy of our approach over example city-wide White-Fi 1 networks deployed over Denver and Columbus (respectively, low and high channel availability) in the USA, and compare with assignments cognizant of heterogeneity to a lesser degree, for example, akin to FCC Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • NRSC-5 RF Mask Compliance: Measurement Methods and Practice April, 2009
    NRSC GUIDELINE NATIONAL RADIO SYSTEMS COMMITTEE NRSC-G201 NRSC-5 RF Mask Compliance: Measurement Methods and Practice April, 2009 NAB: 1771 N Street, N.W. CEA: 1919 South Eads Street Washington, DC 20036 Arlington, VA 22202 Tel: (202) 429-5356 Fax: (202) 775-4981 Tel: (703) 907-7660 Fax: (703) 907-8113 Co-sponsored by the Consumer Electronics Association and the National Association of Broadcasters http://www.nrscstandards.org NRSC-G201 NOTICE NRSC Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications are designed to serve the public interest through eliminating misunderstandings between manufacturers and purchasers, facilitating interchangeability and improvement of products, and assisting the purchaser in selecting and obtaining with minimum delay the proper product for his particular need. Existence of such Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications shall not in any respect preclude any member or nonmember of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) or the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) from manufacturing or selling products not conforming to such Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications, nor shall the existence of such Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications preclude their voluntary use by those other than CEA or NAB members, whether to be used either domestically or internationally. Standards, Guidelines, Reports and other technical publications are adopted by the NRSC in accordance with the NRSC patent policy. By such action, CEA and NAB do not assume any liability to any patent owner, nor do they assume any obligation whatever to parties adopting the Standard, Guideline, Report or other technical publication. This Guideline does not purport to address all safety problems associated with its use or all applicable regulatory requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Bandwidth-Efficient Modulations Summary of Definition, Implementation, and Performance
    Report Concerning Space Data System Standards BANDWIDTH-EFFICIENT MODULATIONS SUMMARY OF DEFINITION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND PERFORMANCE INFORMATIONAL REPORT CCSDS 413.0-G-2 GREEN BOOK October 2009 Report Concerning Space Data System Standards BANDWIDTH-EFFICIENT MODULATIONS SUMMARY OF DEFINITION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND PERFORMANCE INFORMATIONAL REPORT CCSDS 413.0-G-2 GREEN BOOK October 2009 CCSDS REPORT CONCERNING BANDWIDTH-EFFICIENT MODULATIONS AUTHORITY Issue: Informational Report, Issue 2 Date: October 2009 Location: Washington, DC, USA This document has been approved for publication by the Management Council of the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) and reflects the consensus of technical panel experts from CCSDS Member Agencies. The procedure for review and authorization of CCSDS Reports is detailed in the Procedures Manual for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. This document is published and maintained by: CCSDS Secretariat Space Communications and Navigation Office, 7L70 Space Operations Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001, USA CCSDS 413.0-G-2 Page i October 2009 CCSDS REPORT CONCERNING BANDWIDTH-EFFICIENT MODULATIONS FOREWORD This Report contains technical material to supplement the CCSDS recommendations for the standardization of modulation methods for high symbol rate transmissions generated by CCSDS Member Agencies. Through the process of normal evolution, it is expected that expansion, deletion, or modification of this document may occur. This Report is therefore subject to CCSDS document management and change control procedures, which are defined in the Procedures Manual for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Current versions of CCSDS documents are maintained at the CCSDS Web site: http://www.ccsds.org/ Questions relating to the contents or status of this document should be addressed to the CCSDS Secretariat at the address indicated on page i.
    [Show full text]
  • New Methods for HD Radio™ Crest Factor Reduction and Pre-Correction
    New Methods for HD Radio Crest Factor Reduction and Pre-correction April 12, 2015 NAB Show 2015 Featuring GatesAir’s Tim Anderson Kevin Berndsen Radio Product & Business Senior Signal Development Manager Processing Engineer Copyright © 2015 GatesAir, Inc. All rights reserved. New Methods for HD Radio Crest Factor Reduction and Pre-correction Timothy Anderson, CPBE Radio Product Development Manager, GatesAir Kevin Berndsen, MSEE Senior Signal Processing Engineer, GatesAir NAB 2015 Broadcast Engineering Conference Crest Factor and Intermodulation Distortion The biggest challenge in amplifying orthogonal frequency-division multiplexed (OFDM) waveforms used for HD Radio and all other digital radio formats is: a) High Crest Factor of multiple carriers. b) Intermodulation products of multiple carriers Crest Factor vs. Peak-Average Power Ratio . Crest factor is a measure of a waveform, such as alternating current, sound or complex RF waveform, . As a power ratio, PAPR is showing the ratio of peak values to the normally expressed in average value. decibels (dB). Crest Factor is defined as the peak . When expressed in decibels, amplitude of the waveform divided by Crest Factor and PAPR are the RMS value of the waveform equivalent . The peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is the peak amplitude squared (giving the peak power) divided by the RMS value squared (giving the average power). It is the square of the crest factor Peak Distribution . The Hybrid HD Radio™ system uses up to 534 Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexed (OFDM) subcarriers modulated at equally spaced frequencies and 90 degrees to one another. Statistically, with this number of orthogonally opposed subcarriers, there can and will occasionally be very high amplitude peaks due to vector summation of the carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Conclusions from the Cambridge TV White Spaces Trial Contents
    Cambridge White Spaces Consortium Recommendations for Implementing the Use of White Spaces: Conclusions from the Cambridge TV White Spaces Trial Contents Executive Summary: Key Findings and Recommendations 2 What are TV White Spaces? 6 Geolocation Databases: the Key to Securing Flexible, 8 Dynamic and Cost-effective Spectrum Access Economic and Policy Benefits from Use of White Spaces 9 The EU Digital Agenda 10 About the Cambridge Trial 11 Trial Test and Measurement Programme 14 2 Executive Summary: Key Findings and Recommendations There is a growing view that the traditional method of allocating spectrum can create scarcity. Emerging techniques potentially allow a more flexible use of spectrum than the traditional approach where spectrum is allocated across a region for a particular use, but not necessarily used intensively throughout that region. Traditional spectrum allocations pre-date the recent growth in demand for wireless broadband connectivity and a more flexible approach could help address this demand. The fixed nature of radio spectrum as a physical asset, coupled with the increasing demand for it, suggests that it is now appropriate to consider smart technology to facilitate sharing of the radio spectrum between different users and applications. A primary purpose of the Trial was to assist Ofcom, the UK regulator for media and telecommunications, in developing the In June 2011, 11 leading companies and regulatory framework which will facilitate Similar trials are also under way in Germany, organisations1 in the telecommunications, the use of TV white spaces and help to Finland, the USA and Singapore: thus, media and technology sectors worldwide achieve certain policy objectives, i.e., governments and regulatory authorities came together in a consortium to test improving spectrum efficiency and providing both internationally and throughout the the technical feasibility of using television universal broadband access.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Frequency Considerations for Telemetry
    Telemetry Standards, IRIG Standard 106-15 (Part 1), Appendix A, July 2015 APPENDIX A Frequency Considerations for Telemetry Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... A-iii 1.0 Purpose ...................................................................................................................... A-1 2.0 Scope ......................................................................................................................... A-1 2.1 Definitions........................................................................................................... A-1 2.2 Modulation methods ........................................................................................... A-2 2.3 Other Notations ................................................................................................... A-2 3.0 Authorization to Use a Telemetry System ................................................................ A-2 3.1 RF Spectrum Support Certification .................................................................... A-3 3.2 Frequency Authorization .................................................................................... A-4 4.0 Frequency Usage Guidance ...................................................................................... A-4 4.1 Minimum Frequency Separation ......................................................................... A-4 4.2 Alternative method for determining frequency separation ................................
    [Show full text]
  • White Spaces in UHF Band: Catalonia Case Study and Impact of the Digital Dividend Albert Domingo, Boris Bellalta, Miquel Oliver
    White Spaces in UHF Band: Catalonia Case Study and Impact of the Digital Dividend Albert Domingo, Boris Bellalta, Miquel Oliver To cite this version: Albert Domingo, Boris Bellalta, Miquel Oliver. White Spaces in UHF Band: Catalonia Case Study and Impact of the Digital Dividend. 18th European Conference on Information and Communications Technologies (EUNICE), Aug 2012, Budapest, Hungary. pp.33-40, 10.1007/978-3-642-32808-4_4. hal-01543168 HAL Id: hal-01543168 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01543168 Submitted on 20 Jun 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License White Spaces in UHF band: Catalonia case study and impact of the Digital Dividend Albert Domingo, Boris Bellalta, and Miquel Oliver Universitat Pompeu Fabra de Barcelona C/ Tànger 122-140, 08018 Barcelona, Spain {albert.domingo,boris.bellalta,miquel.oliver}@upf.edu Abstract. White Spaces in the UHF bands are very interesting because of their potential use in rural communications, but their feasibility needs to be proven. This paper analyses the TV spectrum occupation in the region of Catalonia, Spain, because it will be one of the first EU regions where changes in the UHF band are going to be implemented.
    [Show full text]