Fame and Fortune Clare Brant · George Rousseau Editors Fame and Fortune
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
John Hill (1714?–1775) on 'Plant Sleep'
Annals of Science ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tasc20 John Hill (1714?–1775) on ‘Plant Sleep’: experimental physiology and the limits of comparative analysis Justin Begley To cite this article: Justin Begley (2020): John Hill (1714?–1775) on ‘Plant Sleep’: experimental physiology and the limits of comparative analysis, Annals of Science, DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2020.1813807 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2020.1813807 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 12 Sep 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tasc20 ANNALS OF SCIENCE https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2020.1813807 John Hill (1714?–1775) on ‘Plant Sleep’: experimental physiology and the limits of comparative analysis Justin Begley Department of Philosophy, History, and Art, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The phenomenon of ‘plant sleep’–whereby vegetables Received 1 October 2019 rhythmically open and close their leaves or petals in Accepted 18 August 2020 daily cycles – has been a continual source of fascination KEYWORDS for those with botanical interests, from the Portuguese Royal Society; history of physician Cristóbal Acosta and the Italian naturalist botany; John Hill; Prospero Alpini in the sixteenth century to Percy Bysshe experimentation; natural Shelley and Charles Darwin in the nineteenth. But it was history in 1757 that the topic received its earliest systemic treatment on English shores with the prodigious author, botanist, actor, and Royal Society critic John Hill’s The Sleep of Plants, and Cause of Motion in the Sensitive Plant. -
The Atheist's Bible: Diderot's 'Éléments De Physiologie'
The Atheist’s Bible Diderot’s Éléments de physiologie Caroline Warman In off ering the fi rst book-length study of the ‘Éléments de physiologie’, Warman raises the stakes high: she wants to show that, far from being a long-unknown draf , it is a powerful philosophical work whose hidden presence was visible in certain circles from the Revolut on on. And it works! Warman’s study is original and st mulat ng, a historical invest gat on that is both rigorous and fascinat ng. —François Pépin, École normale supérieure, Lyon This is high-quality intellectual and literary history, the erudit on and close argument suff used by a wit and humour Diderot himself would surely have appreciated. —Michael Moriarty, University of Cambridge In ‘The Atheist’s Bible’, Caroline Warman applies def , tenacious and of en wit y textual detect ve work to the case, as she explores the shadowy passage and infl uence of Diderot’s materialist writ ngs in manuscript samizdat-like form from the Revolut onary era through to the Restorat on. —Colin Jones, Queen Mary University of London ‘Love is harder to explain than hunger, for a piece of fruit does not feel the desire to be eaten’: Denis Diderot’s Éléments de physiologie presents a world in fl ux, turning on the rela� onship between man, ma� er and mind. In this late work, Diderot delves playfully into the rela� onship between bodily sensa� on, emo� on and percep� on, and asks his readers what it means to be human in the absence of a soul. -
William Stukeley and the Gout
Medical History, 1992, 36: 160-186. WILLIAM STUKELEY AND THE GOUT by KEVIN J. FRASER * Gout was an ubiquitous disease in Georgian England. Although its victims were often immobilized at home for weeks on end, it was not, however, entirely unwelcome. Predominately a male disease, because of its frequency in the corridors of power and association with extravagant lifestyles, it was perceived as socially desirable. Moreover, there was the belief that the gouty were protected from more life- threatening disorders such as palsy, dropsy or apoplexy. Physicians were therefore often reluctant to treat attacks ofacute gout. Such therapeutic nihilism was convenient as gout had been considered the opprobrium medicorum since ancient times and many were prepared to suffer their attacks obediently. Others continued to search for a cure, looking beyond a disturbance of the four bodily humours for the cause of the disease. Pamphleteers fed the huge public appetite for such information, and the diaries and letters ofthe period contain frequent references to gout. However, these accounts often leave some uncertainty about the diagnosis, as most other forms ofarthritis were yet to be distinguished from gout. William Stukeley's descriptions of his own gout are, therefore, of particular importance, for they leave no doubt about the diagnosis.' Not only do they provide * Kevin J. Fraser, MBBS, MRCP(UK), FRACP, Medical History Unit and Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Australia. Mailing Address: Austin Private Consulting Suite, 226 Burgundy Street, Heidelberg 3084, Victoria, Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was made possible by the generous assistance of Mrs Elizabeth White (Texas Medical Center Library), Mr Geoffrey Davenport (Royal College of Physicians), Mr Steven Tomlinson (Bodleian Library), and Mr Alan Clark and Ms Sandra Cumming (Royal Society), Mr Norman Leveritt (Spalding Gentleman's Society) Mr Nicholas Muellner (Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University) and Dr Mark Nicholls (Cambridge University Library). -
The Apothecary As Man of Science
Iv THE APOTHECARY AS MAN OF SCIENCE INTRODUCTION The development and use of rational scientific methods was well established by the mid-seventeenth century. The collection of data and the systematic arrangement of ideas, the application of mathematics and sound reasoning, and, above all, the experi- mental testing of hypotheses, advocated by men of the calibre of Johan Kepler (1571-1630), Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), Francis Bacon (1561-1626), and Rene Descartes (1596-1650) were, by the time of the Commonwealth, accepted roads to the advancement of knowledge. A new intellectual outlook had evolved, as noted by John Aubrey (1626-97) in 1671, "Till about the year 1649 'twas held a strange presumption for a man to attempt an innovation of learning". The English apothecary was, of course, much influenced by these changes. He developed methods of inquiry and investigation, he experimented, he joined societies, he wrote to like-minded contemporaries, he published his findings, and, above all, he had the good fortune to be caught in the toils of collectors' mania, be it "curiosities" or new information. The apothecary had a particular interest in those fields that most closely impinged upon his own profession - botany, chemistry, and medicine. Although considerable advances in the description and classification of plants and animals had been made by 1760, no great theoretical principles or "laws" of biology had been developed. It should be noted, though, that the generation of scientists arriv- ing on the scene after 1760 was able to study an immensely richer collection of natural history specimens from distant lands, which helped towards developing new interpretations of Nature based on sounder doctrines. -
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY We have included full title information for works where it may be useful to know what the subtitle says, or who the printer was. For the fullest available bibliog- raphy of Hill’s works, see George Rousseau, Notorious (2012). Adams, Michael Vannoy. For the Love of Imagination: Interdisciplinary Applications of Jungian Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge, 2013. Addison, Joseph, and Richard Steele. The Spectator, edited by Donald F. Bond, 5 vols, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965. Ainsworth, Edward G., and Charles Noyes. Christopher Smart: a Biographical and Critical Study. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1943. Allen, D. E. ‘Review Essay of George Rousseau’s The Notorious Sir John Hill.’ Archives of Natural History 40, no. 2 (2013): 363–64. Allibone, Thomas Edward. The Royal Society and its Dining Clubs. Oxford: Pergamon, 1976. Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Refections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983. Anonymous. The arguments on both sides the question in the intricate affair of Elizabeth Canning, who hath sworn that she was robbed, and almost starved to death, by a gang of gipsies, and other Villains, in January last; for which one Mary Squires received sentence of death at the Sessions at the Old-Bailey, and Susannah Wells was burnt in the hand. London, 1753. ———. The Beauty of Love and Friendship. London: Printed for Jacob Robinson and R. Davis, 1745. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 315 C. Brant and G. Rousseau (eds.), Fame and Fortune, https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58054-2 316 BIBLIOGRAPHY ———. The Lives and Adventures of the most Notorious Highway-waymen [sic], Street Robbers. -
The Education and Cultural Interests Of-The Apothecary
v THE EDUCATION AND CULTURAL INTERESTS OF-THE APOTHECARY The apothecary obtained his professional training by apprenticeship, a system which, at its best, as Clark has said .. was fully justified".257 Amongst its benefits was the direct transmission to the apprentice of a fund of clinical experience, the advantage of continuously attending the same patients and thereby seeing the progression of a disease, and a practical training that was free from the detrimental interference of both theorists and theories. This last point was not solely confined to the study of medicine. Pilkington believed that Boyle was able to demolish "the four-element system of the scholastics" and "the three-principle notion of the alchemists" because, amongst other things, ". he had not been to the university and so he escaped prolonged indoctrination with scholastic teaching . .''258 The Statute of Artificers (1563) made apprenticeship a legal necessity for the practice of all trades and crafts, and demanded that it should last for seven years.259 Cameron stated that the apothecaries of the London company chose their apprentices with care and that in the time of Queen Anne their education, at least in pharmacy, was efficient.260 A boy aged between fourteen and sixteen was taken to the Hall and there orally examined before the Private Court as to his general knowledge. The examiners laid particular stress on his ability to read and write Latin, and we know of at least one boy who was rejected for insufficiency in that subject.261 After his time was finished, the young man was again examined by the court; most passed, but by no means all. -
Daniel Solander and the Classification of Nature at the World's First Public
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Specimens, slips and systems: Daniel Solander and the classification of nature at the world’s first public museum, 1753–1768 Edwin D. Rose University of Cambridge Abstract The British Museum, based in Montague House, Bloomsbury, opened its doors on 15 January 1759, as the world’s first state-owned public museum. The Museum’s collection mostly originated from Sir Hans Sloane (1660–1753), whose vast holdings were purchased by Parliament shortly after his death. The largest component of this collection was objects of natural history, including a herbarium made up of 336 bound volumes, many of which were classified according to the late seventeenth century system of John Ray (1627–1705). The 1750s saw the emergence of Linnaean binomial nomenclature, following the publication of Carl Linnaeus’ Species Plantarum (1753) and Systema Naturae (1758). In order to adopt this new system for their collections, the Trustees of the British Museum chose to employ the Swedish naturalist and former student of Linnaeus, Daniel Solander (1733–82) to reclassify the collection. Solander was ordered to devise a new system for classifying and cataloguing Sloane’s natural history collection, which would allow both Linnaeans and those who followed earlier systems to access it. Solander’s work was essential for allowing the British Museum to realise its aim of becoming a public centre of learning, adapting the collection to reflect the diversity of classificatory practices which were existent by the 1760s. This task engaged Solander until 1768, when he received an offer from Joseph Banks (1743–1820) to accompany him on HMS Endeavour to the Pacific. -
Rkq *Dxqw +Duyh\ *Rrgzlq &Rxuw )Uhqfk V 5Rdg
Proof Delivery Form USE THIS LAYOUT WHEN PROOF CORREX ARE TO BE POSTED TO AN ADDRESS go to email only page 0 go to free text page 0 go to FV proofing instructions British Journal for the History of Science go to special page 0 go to issue proofing instructions go to navigation screen Date of delivery: 28.07.2017 Journal and vol/article ref: bjh BJH1700080 << ONLY search for mnemonic here Number of pages (not including this page): 33 This proof is sent to you on behalf of Cambridge University Press. Please check the proofs carefully. Make any corrections necessary on a hardcopy and answer queries on each page of the proofs Please return the marked proof within 3 days of receipt to: << Use drop down to indicate turnaround time for proofs John Gaunt, 90 Harvey Goodwin Court, French's Road, Cambridge, CB4 3JR << Add name and address of person you want authors to send their proofs to UK Authors are strongly advised to read these proofs thoroughly because any errors missed ProductionController Keira Munns may appear in the final published paper. This will be your ONLY chance to correct your proof. Once published, either online or in print, no further changes can be made. << Add email address of person you want authors to email any corrections to To avoid delay from overseas, please send the proof by airmail or courier. If you have no corrections to make, please email [email protected] to save having to return your paper proof. If corrections are light, you can also send them by email, quoting both page and line number. -
The Travel Diary of Martin Folkes (1690-1754): Newtonianism, Antiquarianism, And
The Travel Diary of Martin Folkes (1690-1754): Newtonianism, Antiquarianism, and Scientific Peregrination by Anna Marie Roos Abstract: Martin Folkes (1690-1754) was Newton’s protégé, an English antiquary, mathematician, numismatist and astronomer who would in the latter part of his career become President of the Royal Society and the Society of Antiquaries at the same time. Folkes took a Grand Tour from March 1733 to September 1735, recording the Italian leg of his journey from Padua to Rome in his journal. This paper examines Folkes’ travel diary to analyse his freemasonry, his intellectual development as a Newtonian and his scientific perigrination in which he used metrology to understand not only the aesthetics but the engineering principles of antique buildings and artefacts, as well as their context and place in the Italian landscape. Using Folkes’ diary, his account book of his journey in the Norwich archives, and accompanying correspondence with other natural philosophers such as Francesco Algarotti (1712-64), Anders Celsius (1701-44) and Abbe Antonio Schinella Conti (1667-1749), I will also demonstrate in this paper to what extent this journey established his reputation as an international broker of Newtonianism as well as the overall primacy of English scientific instrumentation to Italian virtuosi. 2 Introduction: Qui sera sera, ‘Who or What will be, will be’ is the opening phrase that Martin Folkes (1690-1754) chose as his personal motto and incribed in his travel diaries of his Grand Tour from 24 March 1732/3, returning to London 3 September 17351 (Figure one). Folkes was Newton’s protégé, an English antiquary, mathematician, numismatist and astronomer who, in addition to becoming president of the Royal Society and the Society of Antiquaries at the same time, was a member of the Spalding Gentlemen’s Society and the Académie Royale des Sciences (Figure two). -
1 John Hill, Exotic Botany and the Competitive World of Eighteenth-Century Horticulture John Hill's First Formal Entrée Into
John Hill, Exotic Botany and the competitive world of eighteenth-century horticulture Sarah Easterby-Smith, University of St Andrews Note: This is the final version of a chapter that will be published in Clare Brant and George Rousseau (eds.), Fame and Fortune: Sir John Hill and London Life in the 1750s (Palgrave). As the edited collection focuses entirely on John Hill’s life and work, my chapter assumes that the reader is familiar with Hill and his activities. John Hill (1714-1775) was a physician, actor and prolific writer who, among his diverse publications, wrote extensively about botany in the mid-eighteenth century. Please do not cite or circulate further without permission. John Hill’s first formal entrée into eighteenth-century botany came about as a result of his work as botanical gardener to Lord Petre. While employed at Thorndon Hall between 1736 and 1742, Hill met many of eighteenth-century Britain’s most significant scholars of botany. These well-heeled virtuosi visited Petre’s garden and conversed not only with the garden’s aristocratic proprietor but also with its skilled custodians.1 Hill gained a reputation as a knowledgeable member of a burgeoning scholarly community. He forged connections, too, with his fellow gardeners and with commercial plant traders, who were both his peers and his rivals. Unlike most other gardeners, however, Hill used print to articulate his botanical expertise, to assert his credentials as a scholar and thus to gain distinction among his peers. Hill’s botanical publications invite us to examine how he constructed his scholarly expertise in print, and how he positioned himself in relation to a wider metropolitan community of botanists, gardeners and commercial nurserymen. -
Linnaeus Legacy Pt 1 Web 08-07-08.P65
THE LINNEAN SPECIAL ISSUE No. 8 The Linnaean Legacy: Three Centuries after his Birth Part 1: Unlocking the Past Part 2: Botanical Art in the Age of Linnaeus Part 3: Today and the Future edited by Mary J. Morris and Leonie Berwick 2 THE LINNEAN SPECIAL ISSUE NO 8 WILEY-BLACKWELL 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ Special Issue No. 8 of The Linnean Newsletter and Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London ISSN 0950-1096 © 2008 The Linnean Society of London Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF www.linnean.org Charity Reference No. 220509 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The designations of geographic entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publishers, the Linnean Society, the editors or any other participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. THE LINNAEAN LEGACY: THREE CENTURIES AFTER HIS BIRTH 3 The Linnaean Legacy: Three Centuries after his Birth Contents Foreword David Cutler 5 Part 1 – Unlocking the Past Commemoration Speech Carl-Olof Jacobson 9 The Keen Eye: Linnaeus – The Man Who Saw Everything Karin Berglund 13 Linnaeus: An 18th Century Background Marie-Christine Skuncke 19 What’s -
HUNTIA a Journal of Botanical History
HUNTIA A Journal of Botanical History VOLUME 16 NUMBER 2 2018 Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh The Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, a research division of Carnegie Mellon University, specializes in the history of botany and all aspects of plant science and serves the international scientific community through research and documentation. To this end, the Institute acquires and maintains authoritative collections of books, plant images, manuscripts, portraits and data files, and provides publications and other modes of information service. The Institute meets the reference needs of botanists, biologists, historians, conservationists, librarians, bibliographers and the public at large, especially those concerned with any aspect of the North American flora. Huntia publishes articles on all aspects of the history of botany, including exploration, art, literature, biography, iconography and bibliography. The journal is published irregularly in one or more numbers per volume of approximately 200 pages by the Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation. External contributions to Huntia are welcomed. Page charges have been eliminated. All manuscripts are subject to external peer review. Before submitting manuscripts for consideration, please review the “Guidelines for Contributors” on our Web site. Direct editorial correspondence to the Editor. Send books for announcement or review to the Book Reviews and Announcements Editor. All issues are available as PDFs on our Web site. Hunt Institute Associates may elect to receive Huntia as a benefit of membership; contact the Institute for more information. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation Carnegie Mellon University 5th Floor, Hunt Library 4909 Frew Street Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 Telephone: 412-268-2434 Email: [email protected] Web site: http://www.huntbotanical.org Editor and layout Scarlett T.