RHNA) Appeal Request Submit Appeal Requests and Supporting Documentation Via Docusign by 5:00 Pm PST on July 9, 2021

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

2023-2031 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Appeal Request Submit appeal requests and supporting documentation via DocuSign by 5:00 pm PST on July 9, 2021. Late submissions will not be accepted. Send questions to [email protected]

City of Pleasanton Jurisdiction Whose Allocation is Being Appealed: ______City of Pleasanton Filing Party:  HCD X Jurisdiction: ______Ellen Clark Director of Community Development Contact Name: ______Title: ______925-931-5606 [email protected] Phone: ______Email: ______APPEAL AUTHORIZED BY: PLEASE SELECT BELOW:

Nelson Fialho  Mayor Name: ______ Chair, County Board of Supervisors Signature: ______ City Manager X 7/9/2021  Chief Administrative Officer Date: ______ Other: ______

IDENTIFY ONE OR MORE BASES FOR APPEAL [Government Code Section 65584.5(b)] X ABAG failed to adequately consider information submitted in the Local Jurisdiction Survey regarding RHNA Factors (Government Code Section 65584.04(e)) and Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (See Government Code Section 65584.04(b)(2) and 65584(d)(5)):  Existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. X Sewer or water infrastructure constraints for additional development due to laws, regulatory actions, or decisions made by a provider other than the local jurisdiction. X Availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use.  Lands protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs.  County policies to preserve prime agricultural land.  Distribution of household growth assumed for Plan Bay Area 2050.  County‐city agreements to direct growth toward incorporated areas of county.  Loss of units contained in assisted housing developments.  Households paying more than 30% or 50% of their income in rent.  The rate of overcrowding.  Housing needs of farmworkers.  Housing needs generated by the presence of a university campus within a jurisdiction.  Housing needs of individuals and families experiencing homelessness.  Loss of units during a declared state of emergency from January 31, 2015 to February 5, 2020.  The region’s greenhouse gas emissions targets to be met by Plan Bay Area 2050.

 Affirmatively furthering fair housing. X ABAG failed to determine the jurisdiction’s Draft RHNA Allocation in accordance with the Final RHNA Methodology and in a manner that furthers, and does not undermine the RHNA Objectives (see Government Code Section 65584(d) for the RHNA Objectives). X A significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted in the Local Jurisdiction Survey (appeals based on change of circumstance can only be made by the jurisdiction or jurisdictions where the change occurred).

ABAG 2023-2031 RHNA Appeal Request Form | Page 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65584.05, appeals shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions and accepted planning methodology, and supported by adequate documentation, and shall include a statement as to why the revision is necessary to further the intent of the objectives listed in Government Code Section 65584(d). An appeal shall be consistent with, and not to the detriment of, the development pattern in the sustainable communities strategy (Plan Bay Area 2050 Final Blueprint). (Click here)

Number of units requested to be reduced or added to jurisdiction’s Draft RHNA Allocation: 1,193 X Decrease Number of Units: ______ Increase Number of Units: ______

Brief description of appeal request and statement on why this revision is necessary to further the intent of the objectives listed in Government Code Section 65584(d) and how the revision is consistent with, and not to the detriment, of the development pattern in Plan Bay Area 2050. Please include supporting documentation for evidence as needed, and attach additional pages if you need more room. The City of Pleasanton’s appeal is based on the three criteria that are cited as a basis for appeal pursuant to Government Code Section 65584.05, specifically:

1) Local Planning Factors: That ABAG failed to adequately consider information previously provided by the City of Pleasanton with respect to local conditions affecting housing production, including: a) the availability of water supply to service future housing and b) the availability of land that may realistically be available for new residential development assumed within the RHNA methodology, particularly the conversion of existing commercially-zoned land currently occupied with retail, office and similar uses.

2) Methodology and Conformance with Statutory Objectives: That ABAG’s Housing Methodology was flawed both in process and assumptions, particularly considering the unprecedented reliance on the yet-to-be adopted sustainable communities’ strategy, the Plan Bay Area 2050 Blueprint; and which implementation through the RHNA will undermine key statutory objectives as set forth in Government Code Section 65584(d).

3) Change in Circumstances: That significant and unforeseen changes in local circumstances has occurred that supports revisions to the information previously submitted, with respect to City water supply, as well as trends driven by the COVID pandemic with respect to employment, travel and transit.

In addition to the above, the City's appeal sets forth our substantive concerns with the Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND), from which the RHNA is ultimately derived. In combination with recently-adopted State laws that eliminate local discretion and CEQA review of housing projects, the environmental and community impacts of the “overcounting” of the housing need are extremely problematic.

Please see the attached supporting documentation, including a letter outlining the appeal, and supporting attachments, for additional information in support of the appeal. List of supporting documentation, by title and number of pages RHNA Appeal Letter 7-08-21, 9 pages 1. ______RHNA Appeal Letter_Attachments A thru D, 30 pages 2. ______

3. ______Click here to The maximum file size is 25MB. To submit larger files, please contact [email protected]. attach files

ABAG 2023-2031 RHNA Appeal Request Form | Page 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

July 8, 2021

Regional Housing Needs Assessment Appeals Board Association of Bay Area Governments 375 Beale Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94105

Dear Members of the RHNA Appeals Board:

On behalf of the City Council, and in accordance with Government Code Section 65584.05, the City of Pleasanton hereby submits this appeal to the Association of Bay Area Government (ABAG), of the Draft 6th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), published May 21, 2021.

Our letter is divided into two parts:

• Part I specifically addresses the appeal of the RHNA Allocation, based on the criteria set forth in the Government Code and in ABAG’s Appeal Procedures document.

• Part II addresses the City’s substantive concerns with the Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND), from which the RHNA is ultimately derived. In combination with recently-adopted State laws that eliminate local discretion and CEQA review of housing projects, the environmental and community impacts of the “overcounting” of the housing need are extremely problematic.

PART I: APPEAL OF RHNA ALLOCATION The City of Pleasanton’s appeal is based on the three criteria that are cited as a basis for appeal pursuant to Government Code Section 65584.05, specifically:

P.O. Box 520, Pleasanton, CA 94566-0802 123 Main Street

City Manager City Attorney Economic Development City Clerk (925) 931-5002 (925) 931-5015 (925) 931-5038 (925) 931-5027 Fax: 931-5482 Fax: 931-5482 Fax: 931-5485 Fax: 931-5492 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

Regional Housing Needs Assessment Appeals Board Association of Bay Area Governments July 8, 2021 Page 2

Bases for Appeal: Supporting Evidence for Revisions to City of Pleasanton RHNA Allocation

1) Criterion 1: ABAG failed to adequately consider information submitted in the Local Jurisdiction Survey pursuant to the following:

a) Government Code Section 65584.04(e)(2)(A): Sewer or water infrastructure constraints for additional development due to laws, regulatory actions, or decisions made by a provider other than a local jurisdiction.

The City faces a significant constraint with respect to water supply for both existing and new development. In February 2020, at the time of the Local Conditions Survey, the City had recently learned of contamination from Per- and Polyfluoroakly substances (PFAS) in local drinking water supplies. This constraint has the potential to be significantly worsened by projected drought conditions in the State and the region.

The State of California Division of Drinking Water (DDW) has begun efforts to more closely regulated two classes of PFAS, Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), including an order issued in the second quarter of 2019 requiring local water agencies to initiate testing of groundwater for PFAS. Based on testing completed by the City, all the City’s three groundwater wells, which together provide 20 percent of the City’s groundwater supplies, were found to have PFAS contamination substantially above the Notification Level for PFOS, and one well (Well 8), above the (more significant) Response Level for both PFOS and PFOA. As a result, Well 8 has been taken off-line, while the City completes study of treatment options. The State is currently reviewing other PFAS for possible regulation, with the outcomes of this effort and potential effects on groundwater supplies to be determined.

A May 2021 study completed by the City estimates that it will cost upwards of $46 Million to install the necessary treatment facilities to allow Well 8 to come back on-line; this cost includes essential upgrades to all three the City’s wells and related distributions systems, necessary to provide reliable supply into the future. How these significant capital and ongoing operations and DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

Regional Housing Needs Assessment Appeals Board Association of Bay Area Governments July 8, 2021 Page 3

maintenance costs will be paid for is yet to be determined; and, at the earliest, capital improvements would not be complete until 2025, and possibly longer if funding proves difficult to secure.

The City has explored other alternatives, including purchase of additional supply from the Zone 7 water agency that currently supplies the other 80 percent of Pleasanton’s drinking water supply. However, doing so incurs its own set of significant costs and constraints, and there is no guarantee that these alternative supplies would be available to the City. Zone 7 itself is required to remediate PFAS in some of its groundwater wells, a constraint on its supply and ability to further supply potable water to the City of Pleasanton and other agencies.

Furthermore, the City recently adopted an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the period 2020-2040, which, although concluding there would be adequate water supply available to serve the City’s estimated population (including incremental growth associated with the Housing Element and RHNA), it warns of significant uncertainty around such supplies. Zone 7, which as noted supplies the majority of our potable water supply, faces challenges including declining reliability from imported water sources (principally from the State Water Project (SWP)), and from its local sources. In recent years, actual annual allocations from the SWP have been less than the maximum contracted amount, with assumptions in the 2019 SWP Delivery Capability Report estimating actual deliveries at 59 percent of the maximum contract amount; and 54 percent in 2040. Zone 7 is pursuing several projects to address potential future supply deficits as SWP reliability declines and Zone 7’s service population grows. However, these are major projects that are regional and super-regional in scope and scale, and ambitious and costly, with numerous steps involved to study, plan, and construct over years and even decades.

In combination with the Governor’s recently-declared drought emergency, and the above current and pending uncertainties around water supply, the prospect of accommodating close to 6,000 new housing units as specified in the RHNA is problematic.

b) Government Code Section 65584.04(e)(2)(B): Availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use.

In the local conditions survey, the City broadly identified the lack of vacant land as a constraint to the production of housing; and identified constraints in re-purposing existing commercial properties in the vicinity of transit. This strategy is a key focus of Plan Bay Area 2050 and of the RHNA methodology. Although the City acknowledges opportunities for infill, for example, on existing parking lots that service retail and office centers, and the value in attempting to focus growth near transit, the methodology fails to account for real world constraints and feasibility, including the presence of viable existing uses, high costs to acquire such sites, and construction costs. Infrastructure, circulation, and impacts to local services such as neighborhood schools also make it impractical and undesirable to concentrate all of this new growth in such a limited area. DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

Regional Housing Needs Assessment Appeals Board Association of Bay Area Governments July 8, 2021 Page 4

Plan Bay Area’s mapping of Growth Geographies in Pleasanton show these areas encompassing two Transit Priority Areas (the immediate half mile around the two BART stations that lie at the far north end of the City), and the Hacienda business park, a “potential” Priority Development Area (PDA). The entirety of this area, exclusive of Right-of-Way, schools and parks, existing high density residential development, and recently developed/redeveloped commercial properties amounts to approximately 684 acres. Assuming a relatively high average density of 40 dwelling units per acre, close to 150 acres would need to be developed or redeveloped to satisfy the City’s assigned RHNA. It is simply not realistic to assume that 20 to 25 percent of all properties would redevelop in these areas over the 8-year Housing Element period, given that the majority of this area is developed with viable commercial and retail uses, and points to the flawed assumptions in the Plan Bay Area growth modeling upon which the RHNA methodology is constructed.

ABAG provides mapping in its May 2021 Draft Plan Bay Forecasting Modeling Report1 (See Attachment A) that appears to show thousands of units worth of residential development capacity within publicly-owned lands, and thousands more units assumed to be yielded from Mall/Office Park Conversions. As daunting as the City’s illustrative allocations appeared at the close of the HMC process in Fall of 2020, the latter stages of the RHNA process resulted in Pleasanton’s illustrative RHNA allocation increasing by over 25 percent, to the current Draft of 5,965 units. This late change was apparently based on a series of amendments in Plan Bay Area that eliminated policies to strongly disincentivize jobs-focused growth in the South Bay, and to shift a larger number of housing units from the South Bay elsewhere, including Pleasanton, on the supposed basis of the availability of public lands and redevelopment opportunities on commercial properties in those places.

As described, we believe these assumptions to be seriously flawed, yet no meaningful opportunity was provided for examination of the realistic capacity assumed within Plan Bay Area’s modeling under the revised growth scenarios. The Forecasting Modeling Report indicates these additions to have been made via a “Scheduled Development Events Model” input to the UrbanSim 2 model, essentially a manual input of forecast growth for particular geographies and parcels, that would have allowed for selective allocation of new housing growth to certain communities versus others. This key element of the methodology, the most significant share of the overall allocation, went largely unexamined, and appears to have been deployed selectively and without any consideration of the feasibility of such projects, infrastructure constraints, or community impacts.

The impracticality of this approach is illustrated in just two examples:

1) One of the more significant theoretical development opportunities is housing on land owned by BART. BART, in its August 2020 Transit-Oriented Development Program

1 https://www.planbayarea.org/sites/default/files/documents/2021- 05/Draft_PBA2050_Forecasting_Modeling_Report_May2021.pdf DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

Regional Housing Needs Assessment Appeals Board Association of Bay Area Governments July 8, 2021 Page 5

Work Plan, identified the Pleasanton area BART stations as a low priority for investment in housing-focused projects (both BART stations are identified as priorities for commercial, not residential, development (See Attachment B), meaning that a significant policy shift would have to occur at BART in order to bring these sites on-line during the RHNA planning period. ABAG’s planning priorities, unfortunately, do not mesh with those of the key regional agencies whose participation will be critical to actually produce housing during the next eight years.

2) The challenges to redeveloping of existing commercially-zoned properties are evidenced with the performance of one of the City’s Cycle 4 and 5 sites, at California Center, which despite being re-zoned for high density housing and receiving an entitlement for development in 2016, has yet to proceed with construction.

In light of the above, the presumption that a large number of such sites will redevelop over the next eight years is overly optimistic, particularly with respect to the limited number of such opportunity sites that have proximity to high-quality transit, such as BART.

Finally, the methodology fails to consider feasibility in other respects. The City of Pleasanton’s RHNA allocation includes 2,758 low- and very-low income units. Historically in Pleasanton, as we believe to be the case in many communities, the majority of lower-income units have been achieved through use of the City’s Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (IZO), which mandates that 15% of units in multi-family projects be dedicated as affordable to very-low and low-income households. On the basis of this ratio, close to 18,400 units total units would need to be permitted and constructed, to meet the RHNA allocation for lower-income units.

2) Criterion 2: ABAG failed to determine the jurisdiction’s Draft RHNA Allocation in accordance with the Final RHNA Methodology and in a manner that furthers and does not undermine the RHNA Objectives (see Government Code Section 65584(d) for the RHNA Objectives).

The RHNA Methodology was developed over an approximately 2-year period, including close to a year of process working with the Housing Methodology Committee, and then proceeding through review by ABAG subcommittees and the Executive Board. Pleasanton staff was among the representatives to the HMC, and thus had an unparalleled opportunity to witness the development of the methodology firsthand. Despite the countless hours spent developing and refining the various factors that were inputs to the process, the biggest single input to the methodology has proven to be the initial distribution of housing units (the Baseline distribution) made on the basis of future household numbers as projected by Plan Bay Area 2050. As a participant in the process, it was evident that this factor was a source of significant questions and confusion among those being asked to “choose” the proposed baseline, but, more critically, that those numbers were in flux during, and beyond, the conclusion of the HMC process. DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

Regional Housing Needs Assessment Appeals Board Association of Bay Area Governments July 8, 2021 Page 6

Nonetheless, through careful scrutiny of the data, the failings of the baseline choice became evident. In a series of comment letters (Attachment C), the City of Pleasanton, along with neighboring Tri-Valley Cities, laid out strong objections to the proposed baseline on the basis that it would undermine, versus support regional planning goals that are also reflected in the RHNA Statutory Objectives.

In particular, while acknowledging the important equity and fair housing goals that are integral to certain of the statutory objectives, and which underlie much of the methodology, we believe these objectives have been overemphasized at the expense of other objectives. Specifically, the methodology contradicts and impedes the attainment of certain aspects of the following Statutory Objectives:

• Objective 2) to promote…” the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, the encouragement of efficient development patterns, and the achievement of the region’s greenhouse gas reductions targets...” and

As outlined in our various comment letters the methodology would significantly underallocate housing to the South Bay, particularly Santa Clara County, resulting in significantly higher allocations to other counties, rural areas, small cities, and suburban communities. Whereas the methodology assigns 29 % of total RHNA to Santa Clara County, Plan Bay Area’s projected growth for the County is 33 %. This underallocation is significant in consideration of the extraordinary jobs growth seen in Santa Clara County in the past decade, but also in its contribution to longer commutes, development at the outer fringes of the region that are poorly served by transit and in largely auto-dependent communities.

On a macro scale, the resultant pattern undermines Statutory Objective 2 in contributing to increased congestion and Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT). Indeed, the recent Draft EIR for Plan Bay Area 2050 finds a significant and unavoidable VMT impact based on an acknowledged lack of certainty in local jurisdictions’ ability to implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and other mitigation. In Pleasanton, recently-released mapping by Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) shows most of the city as being within the highest VMT per capita categories. (Attachment D). As discussed in Criteria 1, it is not realistic for most of the new housing development to be assumed to occur within the limited area that is near the two BART stations, which correlates to those areas designated as having low per capita VMT. In practice, available sites to accommodate this significant RHNA are going to need to be found throughout the City, not just in low-VMT areas. This will almost certainly generate significant and unavoidable VMT and GHG emissions impacts. While problematic enough for Pleasanton, in isolation, it is a scenario likely to be seen in many other Bay Area communities and a serious an unexamined real world impact from a cumulative impact standpoint. The Methodology is misguided, and in contradiction to Statutory Objective No. 2.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

Regional Housing Needs Assessment Appeals Board Association of Bay Area Governments July 8, 2021 Page 7

3) Criterion 3: Change in Circumstances

The City of Pleasanton also notes several circumstances that have changed since early 2020, and which were not considered in the RHNA Methodology.

a) Changed Circumstance: Water Supply. This letter describes, in Criterion 1, the challenges faced by the City related to water supply. This issue and the City’s understanding of the severity and significant obstacles faced in addressing the PFAS issue have evolved since completion of the local conditions survey – it is now clear that the cost of investments needed to address PFAS pose an even more significant constraint to water supply than initially thought. This changed circumstance is compounded by the recent drought declaration made by the Governor, signaling a potential return to multiple years of diminished water supply and restrictions for existing water users.

b) Changed Circumstance: Population Decrease. Initial results from the US Census were recently published, indicating the lowest rate of population growth nationwide since the 1930’s. And the COVID pandemic and other factors appear to be driving population numbers down within the Bay Area and the State, including in Pleasanton where recent Department of Finance Data indicates a decrease in Pleasanton’s population by 0.4% between January 2020 and January 2021.

c) Changed Circumstance: Jobs and Transportation Patterns. Another change resulting from the COVID pandemic has been the decline in workers using mass transit, as well as the accelerated transition to telecommuting. Although recovery from COVID is occurring and gaining pace since vaccines became more widely available this spring, experts believe that many of these changes will be long-lasting. Both Plan Bay Area, and the RHNA methodology were built on pre-pandemic assumptions about travel patterns, access to jobs, and transit ridership that have been fundamentally altered by COVID and therefore need to be re-assessed.

Requested Reduction in RHNA, based on Appeal Factors Cited

The City of Pleasanton is requesting a reduction in our RHNA by 20% (1,193 units), to a new total of 4,473 units. The request is based on what we believe to be the two most significant oversights in application of the methodology 1) Failure to account for the increased uncertainty around water supplies that represent at least 20 percent of the City’ potable supply; and 2) land supply constraints that were overlooked or exacerbated in the final stages of the Plan Bay Area 2050 Blueprint process, and which increased the City’s allocation at that time by 1,178 units, 25 percent over the illustrative allocation presented at the conclusion of the HMC process and endorsed as Option 8A by the ABAG Executive Board.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

Regional Housing Needs Assessment Appeals Board Association of Bay Area Governments July 8, 2021 Page 8

PART II: CONCERNS WITH REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS DETERMINATION AND RELATED LOCAL AND REGIONAL IMPACTS This portion of our letter outlines significant concerns regarding the broader Regional Housing Needs Determination. Specifically, we point to the concerns raised by a growing number of California jurisdictions, questioning the methodology and assumptions underlying the State Department of Housing and Community Development allocation of 441,996 units to Bay Area. Similar concerns have been raised by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), with respect to SCAG’s 1.34 Million unit RHND.

We believe it imperative that that the RHND methodology and assumption should be closely reviewed for accuracy, since the significance of any overcount is magnified by the repercussions of implementing Housing Elements that will result in real-world zoning changes in communities throughout the Bay Area. Zoning sites for housing unlocks a potent combination of ministerial and streamlined approvals allowed under recent laws like SB35 and SB330. This streamlining can be coupled with CEQA exemptions and density bonus laws that allow for huge inflations of height and density over even substantially increased base densities, amplifying negative environmental effects, at the same time the power of local jurisdictions to mitigate or manage impacts is stripped away.

While we recognize that the RHNA process is, itself, exempt from CEQA review, Plan Bay Area 2050, whose Blueprint dictates the bulk of the RHNA distribution, currently has its CEQA process underway. The recently published Draft EIR finds no fewer than 24 Significant and Unavoidable environmental impacts, in areas as diverse as aesthetics, air quality, agricultural resources, hazards, transportation/VMT, and public utilities. As individual jurisdictions complete CEQA review of their individual housing elements, a similar array of significant and unavoidable issues will inevitably arise. Chief among these, and, in our view, unreconcilable with other key Statewide planning goals around transportation and the environment, is the unmitigable increase in VMT per capita associated with placing large amounts of new housing in communities poorly served by transit – regardless of the significant “wishful thinking” present in Plan Bay Area 2050 and similar regional plans around the ability of TDM and similar measures to meaningfully reduce VMT in transit poor and auto-dependent jurisdictions. The fact that CEQA exemptions for individual projects further reduce the ability to require mitigations, only exacerbates the problem.

The individual and cumulative effects of the land use changes dictated by Plan Bay Area 2050, and by the RHNA allocations cannot be ignored, and must be reconciled with the equally important goals of the State, beyond housing mandates, to protect the environment.

CONCLUSION Based on the analysis provided herein, and pursuant to Government Code Section 6655.84.05(b), the City of Pleasanton hereby appeals the Draft RHNA for the City, revisions to which are necessary to take account of local conditions and changed circumstances since the local DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 ATTACHMENT A

Figure 15. Mall/Office Park Conversion Development Projects

Draft Plan Bay Area 2050 P a g e | 52 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567

Figure 16. Public-Owned Land Development Projects

Draft Plan Bay Area 2050 P a g e | 54 Sonoma Napa DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 ATTACHMENTSolano B Draft August 2020

Figure 5: Sites BART will Partially or Fully Reserve for Job-Generating Uses and Prioritize for Affordable Housing

Pittsburg / Bay Point Pittsburg Center Antioch North Concord / Martinez Antioch

Concord

Richmond Marin El Cerrito del Norte Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre

El Cerrito Plaza Walnut Creek

Downtown Lafayette North Berkeley Berkeley Orinda* Contra Costa Ashby Rockridge MacArthur 19th St/ Oakland Embarcadero 12th St/ Oakland City Center Montgomery St Powell St West Oakland Lake Merritt Civic Center Fruitvale 16th St Mission San24th StFrancisco Mission Coliseum Glen Park San Leandro Balboa Park Dublin/ OAK Pleasanton Daly City Castro Valley

Colma Bay Fair West Dublin/ Hayward South San Francisco Pleasanton

San Bruno San Francisco Bay SFO South Hayward Alameda

Millbrae Union City

Fremont

Stations BART is Reserving for Irvington

Commercial Uses Warm Springs / South Fremont San Mateo BART is prioritizing high levels of affordable housing BART is reserving part or all of developable land at station for commercial uses Milpitas BART is ﬂexible on land uses

Station included in TOD Work Plan Station not included in TOD Work Plan Santa Clara Berryessa/North San José *Orinda development parcel not owned by BART

Chapter 3 27 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 ATTACHMENT C DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567 D Commission

[ ek

e r

e l l i

County Transportation av r ALAMEDA ATTACHMENT ar

T 0123Miles

Patterson Park Rd

d R d

ay s R d w id Mine

R N M

Mi d wa y

205 d

i ne § ¨ ¦

L L

r G

ct Herdlyn Rd Herdlyn du que a A ni or lif a

n N

B r u n

Way

Clifton Court Rd r B

d n

R k e

a t e

la e s

P r i

r s C n e T

o re Ch

s o r

m e

t a t c

a y

P S Holey Rd Holey

ro y B

d R un s R

Eagle 100.53

Ar ms t r o n g

Rd 84.9 d R ll a h n e d n e

N M d R n n

C l i f f o rd D

e n L a r i o c t i V

R s

d d R R

n e

l R n g

y d

ol l i F R arr C e n a

D y e r

W e

l a

n d

Jer

ro l d Rd k

c e

Gr ee nv i ll e

R d

R r

n D i

a n

t o

u t

a e o

A M

r R

a r

d 34.1

d n

r d

S t e

40.48 e D

Ave R

a v

g a s

L s n o

a L r r P D v A D C ia

e e Sand

t c

n 37.01 n

re 40.61 o Dr

m y

L L a u gh li n R n d

a B A v e

t a

l nal

15.63 d

W io R

n t

W A i y a

o Nat ay

r W u

an 45.94

q hf w

s o ut

e C

So M St

r e H m

n a A 21.05 e 36.98 v

29.32 D S a V a s c o R

37 Cir h d

s ison i Al 45.52

35.57

y Br a searc

W e

l R r Ln

ne Way e k

e c t l e D Rd r 16.19

Ow A

S e r C

30.74 ld a r

40.61

33.14 D as as

r i

t ca E

si r

e s

18.43 Je b

osi e d

Livermore R

36.95

R v

e P

v t e

n y

s s

A y

v f

a a

h a

A t

o e 35.8 L

N r A

W p C nt W

o 42.8

d e

a il y v n a

25.93 ay o

a r

e h

A n

m w L

t t m

L W e

38.02 r g

S i

W a

n l le 34.18 34.3

e o

H z e C K d a l a v a ry

o n

est 42.76 d a

I tt N

R t i

r e S c t y

o Cr J lo

S 37.27

t r

t e h t a L r e H c n

i l l c o e H L

o m t d a o r B n

S r o

s D u r a Buena Vi st a a

s C Ave

a i n D h

V f e r l

o t C

v W e t w e r A n i

c n C

i r

e i a n

C n

7.73 B Da

A l m on

d A ve

c y a

W a l

o 34.8 e y

39.04 L

e S

r 35.53

32.76 u a r M d D 38.32 42.87

ll 33.34

13.19 e 10.13

R b

e e d t lu S v

y n

B k A

H a

o ollyhoc

r m 30.35

y f

31.27

i 58.61

38.33

u D a g n in

d R

a H i l l c re s t

A v

e r

G 37.48 29.63

24.51

We n te te

D St y 24.29

50.75

y r

l W a

o D 27.37 28.19

ho y e n i a d R r o L

r r

c d

nford 38.48

m e

27.36

0.66

46.46

u 26.85 H d

i i g v ta l

h A a l d 28.91

n B W

d a

28.8 S

ra a

15.2 n

a i C

ay o e n d

May d r

R S n d a

D t W k n

a r 27.74

s R a a

h u M

e P c g

PacificAve n

ea n

o u

t o

b 44.06 k, school, shopping/errands, Mine a C

n d i t

N 24.43

d 24.71 R 44.15

C e

E n n

31.22

L s

31.75

B el

R o m r a a n R d t

e t R a

S D o 46.02

g r 41.49 l

9.42 H r 21.86

S a e

21.15 Rd

t t is e 26.53 o 21.66

n n e i oy

M rr

a A V V l 35.89 r

26.47 t

P 29.9 r S u r 31.92 11.18 J d 28.86 S B

ke D r R

lli 28.74

Hi h D

t y n

20.28 r r

a e

o 10.3 21.97

o 50.79

i s

w W

e a

o r r

ki e F a 24.45 D

t H 23.04 S n e a N i u 26.99

S s b

l T S

26.1 l 39.99

n 29.06 t e e

21.09 S

L d 21.78 O H

S d Rd s

St 24.5 t e k

30.08 e L R

t t

k e

N S S 41.83 r H

a C

24.46 N e 35.63 C

N d v nt h

O r

y lc

o t

26.82 A

S a e

0 version, May 2019 May 0 version, n n

45.21 i P 42.78

s ve

29.85 W

a N ege

W A t w 25.63

T R d

e i n r al population in TAZ in population al

22.42

26.22

in County plus estimates of travel distances Dr o

m o t

t d

a ra eya

o 33.03 9.33 Dr o

D g in

dents at the non-residential end of the home- l

S 23.63 e

C n

L V i

d R in c a o n

Ave

x E

i d e

l R s L

n 22.98 r n L a a 31.72

e t ocho ocho M tre a goner Dr n le 26.69 Wa L

b 27.12

M u o

24.66 s dary

o Ca l

D tm t l

i r i

e H

n a 20 model 20 v r i

A D y H e d rt t 34.63

n i

d a o m Boun l R

R N a L n

28.85 i

24.57 o

ning residence site residence ning l r

t r n y

y 3.48 k r t

r 25.72 25.31

e C D n m

25.03 T

o o r C e t d d

l e f

i t o f

r P D o e

r e 36.53 h r d R

d t a S i l 27.73

e d 42.46 a d

T t l L K

e l Al

r R

e D l n t Coun P r o

a a

S d

a y m n y

a Dr ci r

g a a

e r i l

l a

er er

o l

ar d

u g a L a n S

t e A

M n

Av d

a I g

Va 44.09 d

ov G

27.71 29.76 Ri

s k c

Rd Ro

Ce a r i a

na M

an S

l 35.26 a i t

33.41 n k

o n

v H

d A a i 36.33 R d n i l t g r A o

n D l

35.43

R d

34.14 O e R

O d

ve g

33.78 59.8 id

A 39.26 d

g n r r w e l R

r u d

C e ell L k n i V D i

ct rd ori

n a e

R u 28.09

d i M Ol v

bel bel l

33.35 l l O 33.87

n a

yf i D n r

a t

B u

Is s

n H

r i

D d

a n

y y

H m a r a g

e R b y a

D u l M a

D r

a y

w R

e 41.13

P b

r r

E W

D u i a t

R D

30.68 e

18.16 t i e

A 37.76 e o

40.59 V s

y n

E 38.87 a

W o

d i r

a l e

R l G

t d d S o

e e

r n n

v i

R l

a D

D P

A l

k i

e V h

g i

a n

30.97

d o l H R

l H e

arnea

m P b

d t i um e

t a t

y p n

n i i P S

d K L

R w

n i

o 35.52 r

y A D

l 46.7

n i

a 15.83 H

l y

e i b

c r u

a R M r C lie W

Z e o t n

d a

l R

a d

olan Rd th R o d D l

i e f n y H e a

ili

L n

14.76 o

i Ave

c averas Calaveras Rd

e al e l C

v Rd a

s s

A V

rd i a c

y e lle n i

n L V Va n a o v r e n t e i a L n

m P

h 15.26

W 39.95

C ro R a k R

d 38.27 n Rd

a y Rd

33.87 r

m a t

y i e

r l G D

e t

el a

r n i

o P v

40.63 D

i e D t

r Cr Freis n

L r o

Li t t l ef ie ld

R 54.46 d h a C b r l r e o R

d r A 34.04

40.95 d d r n 38.04

trips from workplace) trips from d R

vaner D L

R l

y r r

12.2 S R

T o ur i g a

Dr e 39.14 l

e a n

G l

D l

n T

e y h r e

r t

e p r l

t l W s

e 31.03 l

D e r s A Rd d

r a

p a Ct n t

i e n

t e V h V ra

P ch S

32.05 G H o e 31.26 d d l 30.92

J r o t us R c t n i l B o C L

o Ct

o 37.33 t

Lo S n D

t o

ck ar o d h h w s R C r n n i

r aste g

c e r 39.15 M a v i s

T Dr ll 30.2 S i D 29.13 r d M e D

l y r ous

s r d ubh

O r St l v D C

t y M

t v A n i r g a

l n r e P im l ic r o D

n r

C a

i b s r

B n i

D r

Tu e

32.96

a n

K D

R i

32.4

in e

y W

n v s r 13.33

e ld

e n i r e

F V

o D A D

n t c 25.75

41.45

d 19.46

30.33 i

33.93 i

r ge a

27.83 r

s e y

26.86 n D

r h

32.96 29.14

b Bo

o n

r t C

n L y r r a u

Q 26.15

er tti o

S n s

P 25.11

i a

Av r

n o r i

37.15 l e M

M e

F s K

r i 26.93

re W

a ce D y

So n n

T L de a

26.53 r n

e pe n 29.54 l

D e i St n

oll

K Ind

d r W 25.16 26.82 e t S

an g i n

Bran i p

W 35.4 d M t 31.37 m

s D k lisal S

33.97 a r A d

h K 25.5 e R t t D r e an

m r m

o S

s t

N r e 24.4 d 26.75 25.06

d C

D 24.55 S Koop

n y

e d St R l 25.09 24.51 C R ta

i r l

l a e

38.15 h i

r anta R anta o r 29.43 22.85 S

i e

t t D h r e a R d

R 32.64 o r 32.55

e 30.54 bi

F e

c s

t S t o R e r b

r t p

r e i m

t S A u

1s r y

S n m

i D n h

a o

24.23 e

l a 27.56 20.6 c

M u l 26.84 23.58 e

v l

24.35 37.49

C o c 25.04 y o

21.66 Ave J

n r a

s s c

r y

16.66 y

e L e D

t S a

a V

n 33.37

r r d Pe Dr n S

39.61

r er W R

g r

na o y d

a a n

T b r

21.5 u R a

G r e

nwoo

d d R d p M d

o m

B ri

D e p e

n v

A h

r a ade S y e 23.76 A

D dr

l r H

o lo h n

beyond the 10-county model area model 10-county the d beyond 20 the in population not have did (white) zero values with TAZs VMT per capita = home-based VMT at residence TAZ divided by tot TAZ at residence VMT home-based = per capita VMT VMT includes all travel within 9-county Bay Area plus San Joaqu Data Source: Alameda Countywide Travel Model, Plan Bay Area 204 Area Bay Plan Model, Travel Countywide Alameda Source: Data Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) = VMT also includes estimates home-based of non-home trips generated by resi trips (e.g. lunch trip based (home-based wor social/recreation) at transportation analysis zone (TAZ) contai (TAZ) zone analysis at transportation social/recreation)

w on

H t

18.66 d A a

r 26.4 t

D t

12.46

n R A R

e S

o i R n d l l

r 20.31 e

e a

e d 21.02

w a v

n n

17.43 Ave

D s A

e e

eas

v C

l 24.91

g 25.21

d e a

P n R

d s 21.1 C i

i LEAF

G 21.54 o oga R 23.21 n

K C

N e

vd R

e R

I l d e

23.19 l

O D 16.72 r o

18.28

L 19.77 G

B r

23.24 Y D

27.15

r D

e 27.65

A d

LN e i d R il Dr Rd

n a e r e C s t l

r ON i 22.34 21.81

r T S d b

ee W i

EMER rod 24.92 21.62 D D s k

w r L 29.76

B k

25.88 c

ie sion

20.52

A 21.32 20.1 r

B s

l Dublin

S L T N

i l A R

l AY E

A n

K O

W LM

L e

o P

B M A A

r v

V d k

n L

A r SI K

D R

D e C

l T

k M

r v A e o n o e

a o c s n t

n r

w 24.65 h

u 30.58

G r g e

l i r

a T l

a D S e

R r T

L r d

h H D

l o

i T n L Keppler Ave Keppler

r n

k R e

17.23 l o a

a r l

E 28.94 d Y

N d

c T

I 19.02 D a

u R e M k y i

A v

L v

F 25.85

a k 27.52

e r s

a e d e

o A

l t A e

w n l o

N k n

a W D

w v l d

r o

a e

S d 20.74

P h

B e

E S o r

k w e Rd o a v l o L

c A A

19.64 g 43.88 W d

d e o a

a stwo

r 48.82 o e

l R o

L r C V

a n

Y O e h l e n

R d

B lv

w n o

c l t B D L D t r

s i

Y u 28.9 l

n E c

l r 17.92 l

A l

ma r l a

e A O g

y r E i De i y o g W

2 y i

20.55

s l T r

w W u h

a l

a C b t y

W W

L R

a a 1 W h rl

L r e

u p W N L

i C

I W g m a S e s o

e t o M l T k

H r

T r T

E 24.59 a o g

Y t Dr m t C

o a a

R e R V

I A H T S

Wa b o E a E

p d t

St a t m n R

t P Y l W

s l Dr

e L e

E C h e e a

N R a n

A r

r S

d r

A l

le L C a e

n o

t u

s s H l t ll o

g U l l l

i G no C ig t

8th St a i r

N 5 C

W D 6th St V

S H

E O

mi S t m L a

Pa T

l r R C y o l r C

s Ave Davis r

A r h

D h

r e

c r

K r

R v c t

e 3.85 o

C N r l e

D a r

s n

g A

I T D B

Ja R 4 C

l y y

D z a 29.64

d r Rd u e

c Y

O H i

i D r D n

33.94 t

O r

e N r

I R d

d C n d l e

r l

R e man r S Y a D R

i S u r f t y f o h or c t e r

B n n D

21.68 R

n D a e d

e ans al g St

S C

l M L e D

r e o o r

P 25.62 R

g D V Ps o d

A n

18.21 w

l e

th L w R r c

o 23.03 t n a y r e v A a B

A l w yle

47.2

r D l D

R s l n

L i i

a C n

J s

L ie e

I h

E D r t

k i

r g

n r O e n

M t V

D a r t a

53.43 te r

R h e

1 o n

h O

h u

k d o H T u

m r R 2 u o

A F i e gv

a 1 o

e D n

a 30.67 d o

W p

P n C

J r

A d

n r e

h y n

R i R a

D e n r

g a o

v d

D R e C d

W Z

F L r

n H

o A P L

l 24.79

r i i

l l l C ve

o y

d a

l D t w

m R h

C f

h lkar rair

D r t i a

a r

D A R rl

e r

n r e D e

r n

N K 680 A h r

o Dr o

k P

O v

g e r

d r D

k pe a

n l

e D

N 24.84 N u

i M

t r t

o 37.52

k e l § ¨ ¦

C e uf

c C

u e lo

o P l

B i i

e S i y t

D r r W akim

e l 23.05 erra D

T r

27.34 i t

Si n

w n C d

S n m te Y b

o c

15.42 i e

t W Pleasanton

t 24.2

d e d l

n a

n R S p

g D r

e M

D e o l x

d c

e G n p

r R i i A

t y

D P

R B r il S

r D F Rd D R rth

A Dr d o t L

P h

30.39

r l e M w

o d D c o D l s S r t o

E r l l i

l a l

le L co r a o o E d

o d

r e D n St

b E r

r D o D w

w g e w nt e d o

M r e e a p

r N a n ay r

e r u t u W o 19.96 ya t

p o f P p n i l n

e a O S Br er S e D

S Ib o

C T o u

Dr D

t w

r S P ald

k M 29.52 D R

d rn

w le a

a r e M

r S o c h

D r l a B c

k F r 14.43

W 22.14 p o D

D R 22.71

n h

a D

D a o o t D

e S L

O r

G r E O o

g W ta s s

k Dr L M S l E

B w

n a 27.49 R

u C

T k E e d

a T S A

d y

r c

S o R R

O l a

22.53 o

a L x

t D d

U 43.82

c ks l R h

w C d

r l E y e

Y M

c N

o L a e kw v

r P r

g e l M v a n H e r i t a n

a e

ive il r A R

e A a Pad

L o c

g le R o D r h

T 25.39 m

e ase

W d c

i s n

C 15.66 a P r

21.18 D

r o

d t x

d h

a T e a

g n v

d E e w w

a s A

R n o e i u T 18.55 r g L S

g e

St r n ll

e n a o

l p o

i G s k

D d

o I S o d

o r o e r 18.61 D i

w 262

p R d

R t 25.05 a

y a r r

R R þ

e e e ·

B B B S

k o

v d n

21.32 y

i S Ter ity s c

T C

L k a a m

l l

L a

g S n r

R l n d e k l i r

O i

i r a r i C

v 16.03 n

l a e a V a a

o e

l b r

r n r m

d k P

g Rd r

r e l e

D a i e M i

d a D R i e e

n h Av

C e S K alm ria d

R o e P

d Dr Fremont o

C v

22.02 d g a 19.98

r d l o T t i e d N

r h l r n an o ri ll B

a S

D D D e t n S

k c u w 15.58 o o r e G

ac t B n n m w

b N e h e Dr r Ca

le n d L s ie

d k T a ro t t D a v

d D e e e

c e I

a a n S r

S i l R a Lak

i e r r u v

n steri

l g C y n

t M lg a i

n n c i r d

a L

P D W

C n

n y o

le E o A

d n 33.57 e

a e l w

o z e P D O o y Oak y

d l k r

W y b k u

b e e

R V o t o L

s f N v P L

R d

e Dr 13.58

a s

n a o e

l e n t A

a l l B 16.8 a

e v r A d

t a A e l t g P i

v W e n k 18.15

e i e C

r u w t e

e t

le i e

a W a Dr 22.43 d ys s r w C r d y

r f d St h t

i v O n

g r h a

Mos n c r o C a S e Pl s B

i s

y e D D l ve t d P u R

V A W k l a L

w r g c T i li c

S n E r n Dr a e pe o

d 16.7

d n

d e

21.19 e r n

a R M d

t O b y r e

Rd l r

n Lo o u

l re

R o R

D o

c e a Rd h t

u r

c G S a

c o

D d a

y at

s s

A o l o

r S e

n c

Bedfor

a L

S m r r

n l

u D r

d h r k ve

Ran o

i k r D

w a

r t p D h e e

a o n

a d r e e T i

o a b o

e u

y c Kat

r D r r A abe L

a e e n

D B D y

e J n S

L s n 34.41 a

r o r

C a R i

V r

a 21.47 d

I r

o 18.93

r d O r J

a e n

Mag c

l n

D t

d N D

D l

Dr u ng

e n l i W

D C

O ndover i 21.14

y o l

n ie z

R g s h

l t

T Ma o

t n t e e

l n

t l

u C e

23.25 l

s s h v

o s

W B s

r l

o k r e ef

b i

25.4 S

e r g

B Ln

u A

D r

y i c

r y d r

e D E r r

H w

D S

r r

dl d a D e I

a e

C n i e

Dr D e rs e l v R

n t T a e r

d a o o r H R s t

n r a o i Ave ce d r

V v s

h H t e s i

a W t y

o L D C s n s o

g 880 n e M y

k Ln dale D

emos emos C

o e

n a

A s e W r eni M ro S d E l apa

c I i y ma L Jo Dr

l w l r

e de D d e si l m ia

r r

ek D Ave st § ¨ ¦

l u

k o re n e

a K C o e Ind a

C s

R g

l t o

a a R D e D r

ring

Pa G t

r N

L V n g

B l C o L p

r u

r s

n R R s w M

24.06

P a r e i

S r

l a

o D

L e brid

n l

t t

o C D i

a E T

l r

y s

l O

u L

m H e

l l c

L 62.81

e ing t

S v B

m n i

is 25.25

o A

i a o

a o ts

r D

OR n r

y Rl e y o o

r ob

M a

H e l

C e r

v o

a e

35.29 l

a B e

A i

d B

D B

p n n

ON n

M o r

t h

L R Dr

t S

I e

y Av

t c t

St St e t

I S

r e v a n

r o e

a v d r s

D S

T A lc n t T

a l

S o r r C e j

o D i o M d

r e t l o o

a o

C 27.21 t

e D W w n

y co

a o te

s S

h s

o a

n r

n c G

r r i

s e t

c B

c t

e a h a a r

n t L

d s Ad

D v g T

i Z

a o i Do

d i e l s t

A P A

i H t

R r

h 26.51

R s g

r r

e T i

l e

o n

r r r 23.75 l i

o v y

i W a

l e D W D

r l

N e

P A hap

C g D a D y o

er C e

f r r p

b w l e t

o y

o o

a k kw

ic St

a o e d

h c e

C P

i g R

P d

r a r y C

s s r

G e

t g

N a n u a o e

r L r v

l S t

v C

l l n a r

l t

i B B i

e l D

g l e S

G C O e

o n n r

o S h

Dr a

V shing i

e e s c

d u r y i e

y G k g i t u B

o v

D a

a D

R n u

V s

o r

L k i C E

R w

r D r Cu

S A

b r

r e y t ar i

e r S

e r o St h

N a

t en l t

r r r i ll D P

S E t t

t ya

A g s C

r D e D S

r n R r Ro i ch d s

n e H

o n

a h i St le

l d n n

a R o bi s

l n I des

D D o e

i a e a

r p R

C i

a e M a S a f in r

r v r g r

C n r e d County gl

AlamedaDiablo c u P

a S

g b a i o

D A

M t l h ar e er C

Ha r l a

n D

n n i r M c u v

A e y

d E

i p S G R

l u h s r

i a e

r c

T r e

i r r

i Rd r

V C r D p C

t D f

l r

l a D u

e r e

a h o D

l S

e l

C k B a e v a

n Rd s r D a

la c a

e r

T ol

l t t

a a

i P V

l o e t i

r T St o

d r Joaquin San S

r o

H r ai L r D

r h

e nd n R ta n S

a e r P t S

D L a

r D l s t

l c i M

l S r u

e i P v D ma

l d ry r

m e

c B

D h slie o t

d o r

a D a c

o o

a i

k y l s

a u

l e t

r rge S t

l e

B d

R r B

a D

i h w

Le r al t u

C a D d

r St

s k B s S

L T t

o t A r S d P P ar S

o ro e

l J e r

R b S

D e

e n n

e h Hilo a

y e r s

d s r

r t i a

r r d e en D en

h e d

c G r r

r l D a S

M L t t Rd

d r I

y r

r r

M a O

u D M D d Om r l

i D o a d D

g u

R l in e Alb

P e

C ejoWa

C s s r O

a ry

u l C D

l i r

c O cell d

k r y a

r d o q

r s i D

h e y

M C e d h

32.21 o

a e d p r

h R

R d l

C l y r B

e i Val d

i o

d n V icto iett

n n

R r i e r r

b t D

d r

w o

d T r t e

R V D R R W S

e y n S

t a o

r n a

m n e i t

o Ave

d D d

h e

n a as h a l

o S t R g n

n g r S e r

T S b

i e M

D u l L n n C t

n r a

e il o r a e

t w S D

h M s

o D a w

d s r i t Hu

r e H D

u t W

r gs

m r e nd r

il Bl St e t k A r o

r d M S S

a m i D n n

e n C y

e i o D r N d

s o s c

l a G

h D k io a n R

t E

m o

I st

D D

c r

t o a R R mo

B r

i R ec t n a

o R d W ay e

s H

r e so

a r b

r l

R e d

l S r o H

B m e

t r r l F W n

a t d

a i W

n a

a e

Blvd

o C m R

C S

D i

r e

C C C

Dr r

v r r

R d

I i

w w ut s

C d a o d

k K a

i t V

g s D l

e l

n D g

E l a

P D l i s s lt N

a r

Hi S r i a

R a n

l n ry

r W l a

n l e i

D U ho

a l o m D

r n o

n r t l c l W

d r O t a

a B u

e A e g R

m o S d R

i r

B e

r t u

a r

e P k B t o

c C

c r

k Pe e

H H A y a

d c S P D

Av i

D v n n t

a r s o l Pa

A s te i l

t a

n r

S w r

r Dr

A e

d D r A

e d r

on S

h ya D

r o D

r i u

n e t r r i

u Se

i y o L

R M

Q r n d n o

L e

n M D u

g r

D o a

m R r

d ti

Laurel Dr e t

i a s

D e

k l r

r r

S o

r d d

n i w e

n D v

t PL i

W s

R r

B m r

D G

b a

C o n e

o le o

e T a s n P

y g

h n O u St

p e

g r a

l c v

e a h k

a a e i t E

o O

r r D B e S

d D p ro

g o r

D G

R r r p l

i I L W b D w l

s u

a H R A a

R n e

D y i d

n E

t D r n

n S T D a v M

t e NDHURS

o t

l d

n i Kim r

n A

L l o D g

Y r k

t D e o E

R D

i e v r i r a a L r

Ln E o e

o r a l l

b e a

l F V v a L a

l t

I I N n

Rd r h

o l

D r t G

o d a r p

D n A

an an d

o D

n F a i a

d e

t R uoi N

q y

n n g i s

o C w

A r e i h

d P U n Se

or l n

p t

n M

R e e i L t

d ri n

D She L m o

o i O

W e a

d e o

a a N Br

t v

M s Rd

n Rd B v

Vict i f s

P R C

l f o

e H ri i e A a Rd

n S or ates m

Ri l

a A N

C i e

A t v

l l st

S ew S

A e

a i

D E S

r y

s v e S

lv t o ation t r r i r

e i n e

D L S l r r T

e r D l

M r a kes r D St

d M p

D e

r w t a St r

o D P

y F L v a r

D y S a

R y a A D

a d r o t

o m

e illo r y l

a n t r s n

r M

v n Union City a o

T e r r

W ost e

A re e

W and D L u

A o

e Av

onas m

hl P o r

Q l s y

W h S S l D s

a e n

g S

a i

n o

e owr r

d T G e e a t y H g l

n 1t r M

L l

i D l

n 1 a i

o y Ln w

p o k

o r s r G r v r S m e a

a k l W

e r e e c v

l A one a T D

e G S

m d C

o o

V D rtl ak ve F an o

yst

L d

a e

a y A

d ay o

l e

r l v R

s n O

d n

w i M rey

e Zwis W Gr A

R o

T l

l e

R n

l e

e d t o th s i

P d h

m v

o e

i s

s n o n l yo I m

t R A

S a O

a Han

o n i S

d r

a H u

n g e r Av

d m D

h d

L e l C r

R t

A n l

R St

A A d

G 7 q D

Ami r t s t y e g t

r Dr r d S a

d l y S r n e

o E i

T S a

r D M 238 n r v o

am g p

i o l a

e · l t d

a t w i Robe

C D ia P W r

Ln t o e t

D e k l P i

m l

s J i n e S a

r o n D r a

g r c S n

A y S i o

r C w n

n l o U C o a s a

l b C

e o k i St

D l n o l h d

rtford R rtford t

r e

A l e c B i r a z r

l R c

Dr r G

a i S

l B S arper n

p o r eg

a e k r

d i

a R l

r D a

H t

n o e i l

l t H

dell D dell H

i B

a S n D A Co

d r e B d

y o o

L t

v s M

e D S

m o e a

M x e a rt

v P R y

o s

e o

o o

t r m r c

Cor

l B l M

i F

l n D

S e r a e

i N F t e tar i a D o

St a D T b v r

n ailroad Av d r

h g H P

L R h l D o A

P t al r

St t n r

n e R r d t r

9 o St

4 a d c

r l

s r n D e

B B

l a

R 1 e

r o

e t y

C D

t r

p e

r D St r A P on

r S i

d H

a e

o p g Alameda County

e D v T

v l

Livermore

c n

i Gi

d e ki d

l v

n a

a e

a a

F a c

D F

R i

lv v J A

l v ve C

C a S v

C a A

y e i

P p las Per A

v M r

A C

B y o Dar C

s t

e A k

o n

A Newark

n p

t S s i A

d w v

e R ine ine

r e

l n l

d l

Pu a

e a

o i e

l e a D a

r l d

R r n

i r o t

Kuss RdKuss t D

k e Cl

r o d

u v t a

t y c B

ls Area Planning East D

H u c Dr

d ck

n County

B n e

i e S er St i

o S r

r n

l Dr l

d r l

R R

t n

h L o he b a T

w y

o y T a s e t e

S a s

r W n A

v D y

e r r

r n

Ave o

r r C D k re

c Dr a A

C l C a

C l

a e

yw D

C t a o

n n

t S l i

a e ab r r t

W l

A h n

y a

i a D

m t

l n l

S wi

v I

n C

l B ri Hafn

Pkw a S m e a l

r p f r D n

M e e i

h t f v

y H m L b A

o e r h

B li r e r O

c A n

Da S

L D e Santa Clara

a c

H s

ons m

t Ln L n ry

He m t

Ca i

r n u

n r ir or

e y

e H i

a t St

l e

r r m a o S ry

e R m a D e

D rr

r rt v D

l D r

r v r v

Ave S e

any F e a

ad w e

k D l D

R e

F e c

F am

r e A v

C r h

n t e t

d e Filb

e r a

e C l A i v D a

R b

S c

g i fi r

a e

e e n l

e e g A l

n D i d A s

u e S

r g r y

o l

s rn l

y u

d t d o

a C eh C

i a m

i l

b e C h a

l C r

r t S

s e k S t

a t R

u t

n Fiv o i n

i r

So E

b o ac Mu

t a C F R r t

S t

a f e

d S r

S g r

o w tic

o B

w l t D l o e

v l

r P

L y

P x e

r a h S

i e

o s fa

y i

l o s

C t

b e

l D v e s C Wh a

Ha A

T r a n s i t

A ve A e r

l D

e u r

i G n G e

n a v e

r an M

a a

f i

n e t e

e l e n

d H C r W t

a t t

C t D

v i

L r

o r

a S l s

r T

C B S O t

C A

e (Target -15%): 30.5 (25.9) L y a ri

lo r S e

k D r

y S y l r

r n

s r

m v G D l a urn

a S a e e l

g o E l a

e r Dr

b h

t e t

l erp

n e S

M e

L d

i k i t

irw

C t

r D d n

l Rd s

t l

c u

all al r

S c n

n r

R M a d r

d o

t a

r L l e

izon l v e e w

i o

r S D o

r R D

d o E

D r r

S e d

u a

rb n B St n

had idg r d D l

ow R r

n R d o

D D le

A n ce

d g

u a d

r e de

D r

n e

n r J

d s a a

e St o

n pru

a t a r

R in ym D

a ate B H

e s S Ce

r o w

c Va S

w rid i

R D

e l d i d

l o Av c i S

B e

n l Dr C c w s d

i l a d

ns v C

d A t

S a an

A nt k v oni o

a o u ea S

t r l St

t l r A

e Rd e C r O

g R o

p rid a e en J S

Gre D y Q Lan s

B e t e

r e r w l n t

m D r o B a u e

l r r

l D e

a o i d m t

S O h o

r ver l ck C R d H t

g i

s lo ek c

y h S

T a y e L yhew

r d

y h M e d al

l i o a Dr n n y

i l C r

S c

D a

l P o

s n p te k

W e a

e M S a

Cl e me n t t e

S t a n e c

a 580 d i

N y l n

D o e

r a e

r m d

e H

L W D K a

a t r n B h T

C § ¨ ¦

v D s d

avendi d P

d Sa

n R o v

W t n l a r

p d e Dublin

l L y D

o L B Pleasanton S t t

l r

n M

e t o

ixon S S n i

g S

n t

a L S a e nc

d e

i h D e A d k

R lma a t C

d e s

r 6 a S E a n c

i n r

B e Ave 1 L N C

ro e n

od d n e

S o a n t

a n a

t t

W 2 u

E r

a t r

a d

v S a

i l

h Ave a r e

o D

C B a l m

R h p l

e C n

c l o

H A n r

or a

F D v

l r a u

d a

r A

R i

n D D B W

o ay a t

o e

d d Costa C r

y v

c G

s o s D l

t t

n r T k e i A l

K i o t d

S hyr

a i

e o d

n R

a t

a B a

C R

v S Contra

l L

l y

p e

e d

h y r p

h t County r

u D r S

i a

a t b

e d p

C m l a o d o o l

u v S o d C v

v A

o w owr

e a o n

h ve

G A n

r 12 l

t Ze L

L e A r

D e

S 0t

v t E t

A S

k n s e d i W d a

n a m R g y r

m r n 1 r a f

a fo

Rd D

y W n St

A D a

L mA a

E n

a H g G

a r St

o m i r

n i

r a e

a E t

e r Tupe

s a

n o t u v nd a V

M S

d ic t

i L is

d ls a vd a r S

nyo A t t l S

e v

t B

n S

t a Nil n l

l o d

v l t o

d H k a e C

d R r R a r

on o S e

V F s

v A B

e S

R m a a

g a

r u

m b

r e r

wa D i i

o n d u

n o t

C i C t

l w o

K i s l

e v t n R

A d

d e

d Fremont a

r i l

d i S S e d

g M Dr e

i W

l o

gent

e d n e C w s V j R

H B D i g l

a o N

E L C

t a w

R dy l in e n

l S l l C

i r

g u

F o

ar n

a l

arshal p y M

a Dr S h

ing v r

l k e S m

t o

S d

l y n g

c R t

P r

F a s

r n i t d l a n

o S i a

o A

e o r

m b

R e e D r

a t

H R

B v W

r e

C S an D a i

O r

e J

e e

t e ve e d

A n

e r ey

v m v r ry ry

A r A

v n

t t a ete

e e

i H Rd iel

es r

S a l

or o

l d

F l G

l e l

M h

l A

v a

> 25.00 > 25.00 - 20.01 20.00 - 15.01 15.00 - 10.01 10.00 - 0.01 0.00 t v M A E e

o d e W c lv

Ave

r A o r

a A D Th D S

d R B e s d

t r D n Qu h D

i Dr

l a r

o c

a a e h y R

v s n E t n

S d t

dy dy

Ju n D A

i a a i n

e v i

l a

ye l r e

e R

a ve v r m m

A t h

St r

g s C

i o

a n r

e M e B

i a e e

e k c a t

A F s

A c b

m l i t r

e D

t P e h h r

J s n

H a

a S a

S t D

y el t on

S d

i D D a A he

r e r r n t A

v R ve n

t r w E C

A r A k S

r n ni

e abe n

t e y e Ave e e R C pa a

e r

n Tam i m e i a

e T n

e C c g U c F

y d

S o r

v d B e p i

e n

v u S St ly

l M

e T J

ve edi o

l A M k A

a o R

R n

x pa r Fr

om D

P e n s

n c A

d s n

r o e

r uee Q

S s W n v a e a

a i r M a a t

A Rd

s Newark e

n City Union R t

e J

r a

o e t e f

onA S

v t v t

K ve

D o

g l

A a A r l

s Dr a L S e e D b

l r Sot a

s C

h e i

l ils in

h e re

a A v P

i e

u t

p e ar s Sa t n e n

g u r

r c e V l

o A v e e d ve

A m s v nge nge a M d r

d O y

e D i a

H W C

o e e S W

s y h an rt l S v

m t e R Rd

ding A Ga

t H

d i T A

o ge M r e m

Par r n

R o e n

Av e e r C o v a J Un d e r w o o d

v A e v g e

e l C

e d y ge e an o ca A n i R v

t a n

t a a S

le l S a

if d r

c Ri r e

R e S

d Ave d v Rd

d R l n

d i l o d O

S t a n w o o o d

A v e e W

R o t A a n v

n A s a

m S ita r oo i r

l n H

ah Os l A n ar H al Rd i

L r

A r S w t D r b m a r d o ud k t P South Planning Area Planning South

r t p

D ia lorid a

a n p n ch l e

lle l k t

bm o u d i r F

r M R S E t

e a

R R S a W H d

t R Mi a S le

a N ipp n

n i h

r O W e

d s

o e g L a a t s t G

m is P Dr

v ve

d n R S

i n W t n e e

y C

so R d

t S o A v A a

e d

d d v

w u A

t r and

t n l o Hayward

n ia C W

o l a e

c a en

k D o o E

e Gr s

w a g ro d D

c na B

i e

d v d

e B

r t

e W p rm s ri ga Ave

S alaro e r a d

C s

y R d

e d e

R l D A s

h w a

n St

i a s

e v

e r

V o T E

R c e t

r i r

e lta l C n Ave r C

l r t

D v M

2020 Vehicle Miles 2020 Vehicle per Capitaby Traveled TAZ

e a a A e y o

A o

r Gar P r S

g A h

a s

d r

Pe e

r y o erm e

r t S

R n D

y r B d

w e e

l e Central

y r o

a n

e a Pe A

v i

Av n A e e

R C m h m l

r e m a

l d

D o v o a

e o

r A e

d v

A r g oy T E

t A

D k

n e S L d

n e l f l

o i l o

i v

t d o

l n r e Way e

o r r

n D v M r v E

a malley r a

n l k A

h u l Way

C e o e D f

S r a

D J

l B a i J B

r et M r

y l

d W r PlanningArea y

a m t

e L i

l a

dmo e

V e A

c ill

v l Ave S

r a Kay v

y r i v

D d o W

t j r i

W l e A

n t e B

A r lia

n A e e n W

D v v r 84

n o A id o St O L

Blv n

by ave w Ju

t l s m elh A

o d D

e d o B e e o ve n

d S t

e v þ

n o

L l

r d v y

R la F l e

o a

e A

tan o s d v

t 185

h P o I e o

s A S

A g

R o

c þ

S r Ct

s v

S l a

n o

H l

r a Gr b B

e i a s Rd s a m m

u o

e e l A

l San

l a

v d

R a h w v h h nd

t er

A P a t lv A

n a S

E l

B r

p t B u

m B

w m

t e S

East Planning Area h ll d

l a

o e rn

rsh

a d u S r l

S v

r r F l

7 ve mo

e v u

B in E l i l Ma

r rial v Leandro

6 s t

os d A D t

T B e A 1

N n n S r

t M ve us

d y o

e d r s

e n B vila

R r d

Ba arw

i r a A v P

e St a n

r s H d

s y d Neva In C

a i e D

C C o a

l g a d r a d e

G n S

l L A

an e

l ve

ay A h

to a

i est

k t

r a

l l

r t Ave e

u W

ve aw

e a y W y

S e ve g

P h

o d

d A d

S A

s e M

r A

y h at

t h y e o S

t v

r r r

l H

6t v

e fo Dr

a D A e

e ory

b he ict

d C d v V on

b d ida Dr

n t s A A

i 16 h

a R

a 165

C s

R n

i S L Av e e n r

nt gwoo B

M a

r b e v

n o i u

B d

m i

P m r A

e d Y

th Me i r r n Oakland

n a Mohr D te R

t 4 T G

y on

a D

t a

l o r 6

n h o

e L

i o e Ed p e S n

c e

v M r North

a r e

p n

a e v A o n Rd

a v l C

S C Av a

A d e R m

C t A y

o v

est d

d a o r

er A R r

g n d r d

b r

r t D

2 H

n W n A

Dr i t t

a a

X D s e

d 1

au c e d

Trl t il i t

al ch m

n s w a Bl ent

O M r R Cla wi t e r

n oraga a t R y R Rd

Old M u n e

S k m

r v o t

Do t

238 o

Q k A

B S Middle Ln o

D s

ed y PlanningArea

h a l

e r e p Piedmont

D r Valley Dr Rd t gin § ¨ ¦ b o o v

D 9 l o r e

p n

y T e e u d

r e Shu r o P 5 d

v r S n

r E r R

e r v

d I

1 A D ve

A o g

g a n

D Links Via n i

D r f v e

A d

e h l t C a

y n

u A

i a

D L

c v

A a e

S E r g d

s d Go a a e A v e

a a r T V r O i o d l b

a l t i

i o

r r n

e r A

r S l

a Fernwood Dr Fernwood L ve

D s e A o r

e e V l

i S d S n f

d a

e v o l

f i A can A e n

d D i

r a

a n V

abl v

a r

a i

n A

e i

M n e e

e r

r S r e

V i Du W

i e A

e d o

e W D t

a s t i

a d i

e R i

K l v d

l p

t S r t

S a B t

m a t

D v

v ri

l p

o S

r l D c

T r e

i l

Carr Dr Carr e w Wagner St

u e l

n r Eichler St

W t n s a

n i H

D l r e d n a r o i A l

D s l v m

A l A e

a e

g y D a B

n e P

rp A a

i n k c n e v d

s N i k l D 51s

l E r n

f r S o r s

d St Connecticut e

e a i w S y r 0th e r t

D M t L D n P A it S

P k n 5 a

h k

r D e

S a n W

r S r B w r i

o s e a a f u a

a y e r b

r e e t Der y Av r e E mod a s s i n e

G a St Foley

u o Berkeley s v P r

D m S a o

r e r b

i v t e r ia a n C l N B

b S n V a t

R C

D E D

i D a itos County

u d r am t e c r S

s l

t a

l z S

i v A

a i s

a i y a

s i h w t o e n

C e l A V S

v M n i

c V S r

V i a Albany r d v l

o e D e uita l

M q I

k l A a i

L i h o y o Dr mp C t

A l D a o

o f k e C a r l l M i r M f D

b i e V S

a St Bernhardt Emeryville t V

d Mateo San s Alameda i a

e t c c k

s r a k e e o

o n t v a

r S r D s

l i

o F W S a

ho Dr k s R

C u c d e A P r

C S

y v

l V an

G e

a o s k oc l a o

m R e

r l l

n R a A e Av a

f e rig i

G e e v

k r r h

v t t

r D a V n C e a

a e g r n

t r i i

D s

Ke y

n R e

c g

y Ln i a A

A i L

S l r

i i n

e d a a

v w

h l

e v

e ll i

s o

a i

L n t r l v

Vi a

e r e urre n

e i M n v

H L 0

D S

l A

y d a

f B E d n Hayward

e p

e lvd

l l 4 S a

s to

g i M 1 ot B

7th 7th n

w i r o

S h

E e s Cab R

4 V

D e a t a

r r i

1 W

G S Bu

d D n

s v

Av 92

i y

r V

s n n

i e 109

l r o e

D A t a n

th th

r A

n v

D e þ

i ·

a a i o e

v h þ t

i a l P ·

C l r

d v

hannel n V e

u g

S r

m e

e Av h

v S D 138 C k

W e o

v R

o A n

d r e r

m D

c d r 6

A s e

i s

B R l d

l v

a i

A o

bil

3 C r o s k

D b y S d

a l a o

n r r o

F t i r t

n a

a r i

t Av

a a

a C

g g H e

k z o

o Bo

i B

e r

t San

n u u y

l Sy

H B

y k D

l r n

a l r m i o

o T e y a r

d d D ud o

v A t h u cq

r o

n A A e

v F R e W c

d a

r t q

A n

uana uana v a

l r

s i

n et

r l

r w

d e t

p S n

o n i e

t e to J

R r

l e or e

N W

a Ivy Dr Ivy e

l o B lv Ma

t Alameda County Average (Target -15%): 19.4 (16.5) t L a h

D V

s T l m e

r S

e t

r County

a r Bl

h l e n ar i r

u N

G B

r r a M

e v

h o ia

D s h u m C

e C

e g t Av F

B r o

D r

n M V

i l A

d u o e

g a

i v

e i

P o

a P o t e

l o

ie o S a a

o tty

C R rth

p Bea

R l V

d F e

A Francisco i

h l

l n

v t

i d a H

r e

Vi s a

c East Planning Area Averag t

e e

m r

R i

d c

n a a u 6 l k Els Dewey St

a u v

v r S

o R i

g g 114

d A

es M r

1 þ

C M e

Ma r ·

A v Dr u

A n Rd n

uin Av uin

P y

n y o e

Trl o o e t

A d e r q

Ardith Dr L v S le

du A s h

A 8t rt e d B

Oakland e o t h

R y ol D rnsw t

eb r Fa t v n

e v

m 0

l n r

A l

n Av

h n

Le r

a oa D a K e

v rs 1

t a

k o h A

o D S r B o J

r J

r n Wo St

r r r nverness S

e I l c

t A

A i

a F n u e Dr Vining

t D a G

b h

ig u e j

h ant

p San Leandro

L e

M o

n n u

t n P

R k a

ro r s St Wiley Ave

r i D

k o t

u a l

a e

e a ur r

n n i

Vehicle Miles Traveled per Capita o D st i A i p A r

c w

a D e th e

o t t T a

D v m v Es

g a o

m s r r n m

r S A h

u l 9 t a t a u C r a

D t S

B a o M e is St L a 9 r a r i S

C M E t a 7 s e all na D

t i H

T rk

l 0 y

M urr S o H a orv lv B V 1 H Cla C Acacia St E DocuSign Envelope ID: 0A7210A3-2E6E-4B7B-9430-784531370567