DOCSLIB.ORG

The SAMS Lyceum of Martial and Societal Antediluvian Chronicles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The SAMS Lyceum of Martial and Societal Antediluvian Chronicles An addendum to The SAMS Sporran – March 1, 2019 American History Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see.* I used to tell all my students this as often as I could As a student of History and a teacher of the same subject (30years) I have always believed that they way to discover the truth was to research it. One shouldn't take word of someone else.* More than likely their 'word' is; an opinion based on a 'feeling' not a fact. It could be an assumption based on another assumption. More than likely it is something repeated by someone who heard it from someone who heard it from some else. Hence, the Don't Believe Anything, shibboleth. People have always done this. By way of example one phrase the vacuous talking heads and television newsreaders always use is; The 50 States**. Although this is demonstrably untrue, it gets repeated and repeated until most folks take it as a truism. Another of repeated malapropism is 'The Office of The President'. I always enjoy (if that is the correct word) January 20th every four years. I take a perverse delight in listening to self proclaimed 'experts' discuss the proceedings. They spend the day 'analyzing' everything and as usual they all are incredibly wrong. They simply haven't taken the time to perform simple research about what they say. By way of example, our current president is in actuality our 60th - president. Yes Virginia, there were fifteen other gentleman before George Washington.(Remember him? He was off fighting a war in 1776. He didn't become president until 1783.) His predecessors were Peyton Randolph, Henry Middleton, Payton Randolph (the first president to serve non consecutive terms. Gover Cleveland was the other.) John Hancock, Henry Laurens, John Jay, Samuel Huntington, Thomas McKean, John Hanson, of Fredrick, Md.(John Hanson was the first president to serve a one-year term under the terms of the Articles of Confederation. There is a statue of him in The Statuary Hall in the US Capitol. It proclaims him the "first President of the United States") Elias Boudinot, Thomas Mifflin, Richard Henry Lee, Nathan Gorham, Arthur Saint Clair and Cyrus Griffin. These distinguished gentlemen were ALL Presidents of the United States. This is fact, not opinion. You can look it up. As an addendum, the first president to actually earn a Nobels Fredspris, (Noble Peace Prize) for was Theodore Roosevelt. For the nay-sayers there are a some 'progressive' historians who claim they were presidents under the first, or “older' therefore incorrect laws. Many of those laws remain in the constitution and some were 'amended' and some were voided as is still occurring today. These “progressive historians” ( Think of George Orwell's acclaimed book 1984 ) claim that because we 'revised' the Articles of Confederation and these men don't count. Therefore our 'real' first president was George Washington. It is obviously a fallacious statement. When we, the people, revised or 'amended' those laws we tossed out the rules that didn't work. We kept the ones that did and added a few more. It is clear that these 'historians' (and I use that word advisedly) never actually used a dictionary, studied logic or critical thinking. Using their own twisted logic every time we amended the laws we would have to start from scratch with a whole new list of Presidents. The last Amendment (change) was ratified on May 5, 1992. This foolishness would lead one to the conclusion that our first president was William Clinton and our current president Donald Trump, is the fourth president. Clearly this assumption is both fallacious and illogical. I refer you to the writings of Jonathan Swift, Alexander Pope, John Gay and John Arbuthnot, who in their missive The Memoirs of Martinus Scribulers asks the question; If you have a pair of socks and fter a time one gits a hole you mend it. Wear it again only to find another hole. You darn it again. This scenario is repeated until there is none of the original thread left. Their question was, “Is it the same sock?” Quod erat demonstrandum. “To penetrate and dissipate these clouds of darkness, the general mind must be strengthened by education. Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government.” Thomas Jefferson *One hears gossip, rumors, and opinions. Magicians make you 'see' events that haven't or couldn't physically happen. Both of these are what the dictionary refers to as 'illusions'. **There are only 45 states. The Republic is also composed of 4 'Commonwealths' and 1 'Union of Plantations'. ( Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Virginia and Kentucky are commonwealths. Rhode Island is the Union of The Providence and Rhode Island Plantations. I kid you not. You can look it up. ) Scottish History The Myths of Saint Patrick Dispelled The time has come the walrus said, “To speak of many things of of sailing ships and sealing wax and cabbages and kings of why the sea is boiling hot and whether pigs have wings.” With apologies to Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (Lewis Carroll) - the time has come to set a few things straight about an up and coming 'holiday' Saint Patrick's Day. ie: Saint Patrick was Scottish. He was an Italian born in Scotland. Okay not an Italian per se but a Roman. There are many stories floating around about St.Patrick. There are many societies and authors who for whatever reasons want to claim certain “facts” about him. Most of these “facts” are based on hersay, translation errors, or local legend. To learn the truth one must deal with written first level sources. So here are the facts about St. Patrick as recorded by several reputable sources including The vatican after all, he is their saint. Saint Patrick was born in Kilpatrick, Dumbarton in AD 415. Klpatrick was in Caladonia, the Roman name for present day Scotland. It was also part of what later scholars referred to as Roman Britain. Even as late as the 1960's many folks south of the Boarder referred to Scotland as “North Britain”. This led to the confusion about Patrick being British or Welsh. It was simply a case of poor scholarship on their part. His real name was Maewyn Succat. His parents were Calphurnius and Conchessa Succat. His father belonged to a Roman family of high rank and held the office of Decurion. (A decurion {Latin:decurio, plural decuriones} was a Roman cavalry officer in command of a squadron (turma) of cavalrymen in the Roman army.) His unit was stationed at The Antionine Wall marking the northern boundary between Britannia (Roman England) and Caledonia (modern day Scotland). Conchessa Succat was a near relative of the patron saint of Gaul, (France) St. Martin of Tours. When he was sixteen, Maewyn (Patrick) was carried off into captivity by Irish marauders and was sold as a slave to a chieftain named Milchu in Dalriada, a territory in the present county of Antrim in Ireland. For six years he laboured for his new master. One source claims he tended his master's flocks; another refers to him as a swineherd. They both agree it was in the valley of The Braid and on the slopes of Slemish, near the modern town of Ballymena. Following his escape, he joined the priesthood and changed his name to Patricus. At age forty- three he became a bishop and asked to be sent to Ireland. Upon his arrival he sought out his former master and paid him the amount of money that was required for a replacement. The town of Kilpatrick, Scotland still retains many memorials of Saint Patrick. At Kilpatrick frequent pilgrimages were held far into the Middle Ages to perpetuate the fame of his sanctity and miracles. Now that we have the facts about St. Patrick straight, you might be interested to know that: * “Saint” Patrick isn't a real saint he was never Canonized by a Pope. *St. Patrick’s Day was first celebrated by the Church of England. It was religious Holiday. *In Ireland, it was a dry holiday until AD1970. *The modern St. Patrick’s Day was entirely an Irish-American creation. Which explains a lot. *The first St. Patrick’s Day parade was held in Boston in AD1737 by Irish soldiers fighting for The British. *He did not preach using a shamrock (Gaelic for young clover). Also the shamrock is not the national symbol of Ireland that is The Celtic Harp. *The shamrock, has three leaves and was associated with three, a sacred number in the Celtic (Druid) religion. It was also the symbol of “The Triple Goddesses”. There many forms of the Triad or Triple Goddesses in the Celtic Religion. For example, in ancient Ireland: The Morrigan Triad was Brigid, Ériu, and Morrigan.The similarity between the Celtic Triad and the Trinity was not lost on either Patrick or the Irish he sought to convert. *St. Patrick did not chase the snakes form Ireland. There never were snakes there to begin with, at least not the reptilian kind. Along with Ireland there are no snakes in New Zealand, Iceland, Greenland and Antarctica. You may hold that tidbit in one hand and a dollar in the other and buy a doughnut. *The original color associated with St. Patrick is blue. *“Corned” beef and cabbage, a traditional Saint Patrick’s Day staple, doesn’t have anything to do with the grain - corn (It didn’t arrive in Europe until the 15th century and then it was referred to as maize).
Recommended publications
  • Politics, the Judiciary Act of 1789, and the Invention of the Federal Courts

    Politics, the Judiciary Act of 1789, and the Invention of the Federal Courts

    Duke Law Journal VOLUME 1989 DECEMBER NUMBER 6 "TO ESTABLISH JUSTICE": POLITICS, THE JUDICIARY ACT OF 1789, AND THE INVENTION OF THE FEDERAL COURTS WYTHE HOLT* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Why Do We Have the National Judiciary We Have? . 1422 A. Unnoticed National JudiciaryPuzzles .................. 1422 * University Research Professor of Law, University of Alabama School of Law. B.A., 1963, Amherst College; J.D., 1966, Ph.D., 1979, University of Virginia. This essay is copyrighted by the author, who reserves all rights thereto. The author is grateful to Dean Nathaniel Hansford and the University of Alabama School of Law for their generous support of several years of research that forms the basis of this essay, and for a sabbatical leave that also in part supported the research for this essay. The author is most grateful to Charlene Bickford, Kenneth Bowling, Helen Veit, and their colleagues at the Documentary His- tory of the First Congress project at George Washington University, who graciously made available their magnificent collection of materials and have been kind enough to advise, assist, and cheer the author on many occasions. The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Jim Buchanan, Christine Jordan, Maeva Marcus, Jim Perry, Steven Tull, and their associates at the Documentary History of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1800 project, for generously giving time, advice, and expertise, and allowing the author to supplement his research for this essay with their fine collection. William Casto, Eugene Genovese, L.H. La Rue, and Sandra Van Burkleo commented generously, helpfully, and often persuasively upon earlier drafts. Finally, the author gratefully ac- knowledges the expert aid, pleasantness, and unfailing good cheer extended to the author by the many librarians and research aides at the numerous repositories cited in this essay.
  • A General History of the Burr Family, 1902

    A General History of the Burr Family, 1902

    historyAoftheBurrfamily general Todd BurrCharles A GENERAL HISTORY OF THE BURR FAMILY WITH A GENEALOGICAL RECORD FROM 1193 TO 1902 BY CHARLES BURR TODD AUTHOB OF "LIFE AND LETTERS OF JOBL BARLOW," " STORY OF THB CITY OF NEW YORK," "STORY OF WASHINGTON,'' ETC. "tyc mis deserves to be remembered by posterity, vebo treasures up and preserves tbe bistort of bis ancestors."— Edmund Burkb. FOURTH EDITION PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR BY <f(jt Jtnuhtrboclur $«88 NEW YORK 1902 COPYRIGHT, 1878 BY CHARLES BURR TODD COPYRIGHT, 190a »Y CHARLES BURR TODD JUN 19 1941 89. / - CONTENTS Preface . ...... Preface to the Fourth Edition The Name . ...... Introduction ...... The Burres of England ..... The Author's Researches in England . PART I HISTORICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL Jehue Burr ....... Jehue Burr, Jr. ...... Major John Burr ...... Judge Peter Burr ...... Col. John Burr ...... Col. Andrew Burr ...... Rev. Aaron Burr ...... Thaddeus Burr ...... Col. Aaron Burr ...... Theodosia Burr Alston ..... PART II GENEALOGY Fairfield Branch . ..... The Gould Family ...... Hartford Branch ...... Dorchester Branch ..... New Jersey Branch ..... Appendices ....... Index ........ iii PART I. HISTORICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL PREFACE. HERE are people in our time who treat the inquiries of the genealogist with indifference, and even with contempt. His researches seem to them a waste of time and energy. Interest in ancestors, love of family and kindred, those subtle questions of race, origin, even of life itself, which they involve, are quite beyond their com prehension. They live only in the present, care nothing for the past and little for the future; for " he who cares not whence he cometh, cares not whither he goeth." When such persons are approached with questions of ancestry, they retire to their stronghold of apathy; and the querist learns, without diffi culty, that whether their ancestors were vile or illustrious, virtuous or vicious, or whether, indeed, they ever had any, is to them a matter of supreme indifference.
  • Governor Annapolis Convention Edmund Randolph * Did Not Attend

    Governor Annapolis Convention Edmund Randolph * Did Not Attend

    Officers of the Commonwealth of Virginia 1787–1788 Governor Annapolis Convention Edmund * Did not attend Randolph James Madison Council of State Edmund Randolph Beverley St. George Tucker Randolph (Lt. Governor) Carter Braxton Walter Jones* Joseph Jones George Mason* James McClurg William Ronald* Boiling Stark David Ross* James Wood Meriwether Smith* Miles Selden (resigned 31 March 1788) Sampson Mathews (resigned, 7 April 1788) Delegates to Congress Elected 7 November 1786 William Heth Edward Carrington (first attended 2 June 1788) William Grayson Treasurer Joseph Jones (declined) Jaquelin Ambler Richard Henry Lee Auditor of Public James Madison Accounts John Pendleton Elected 23 October 1787 John Brown Receiver General Edward Carrington of Continental Taxes John Hopkins Cyrus Griffin (President) Attorney General Henry Lee James Innes James Madison Solicitor General Confederation Board of Treasury Leighton Wood Arthur Lee General Court Paul Carrington Constitutional Convention (Chief Justice) Peter Lyons John Blair James Mercer James Madison William Fleming George Mason Henry Tazewell James McClurg Elected 4 Edmund Randolph January 1788 Gabriel Jones George Washington (President) (declined) Richard Parker George Wythe Joseph Prentis Patrick Henry (declined) St. George Richard Henry Lee (declined) Tucker Alexander Thomas Nelson, Jr. (declined) White Court of Chancery Edmund Minister to France Pendleton (President) George Wythe Thomas Jefferson John Blair Court of Secretary to Thomas Jefferson Admiralty Richard Cary William Short James Henry John Tyler Cite as: The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution Digital Edition, ed. John P. Kaminski, Gaspare J. Saladino, Richard Leffler, Charles H. Schoenleber and Margaret A. Hogan. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2009. Canonic URL: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/founders/RNCN-02-08-01- 0014 [accessed 06 Jan 2011] Original source: Ratification by the States, Volume VIII: Virginia, No.
  • Founding U.S. Presidential Facts #1

    Founding U.S. Presidential Facts #1

    •The Journals of the Continental Congress and the United States, in Congress Assembled report that there were six Presidents of the Continental Congress and ten Presidents of the United States, in Congress Assembled before George Washington's Inauguration in 1789. •Two of the Presidents, John Hancock and Samuel Huntington served in both offices bringing the total number of men holding the Pre-1787 Constitutional offices from 1774 – 1788 to fourteen. • A fifteenth founder, Samuel Johnson of North Carolina was elected the 2nd President of the United States, in Congress Assembled but refused to accept the office. •David Ramsay of South Carolina served as the Chairman of the United States for the absent President, John Hancock, from November 23, 1785 – May 12, 1786. •Upon Ramsay’s resignation, Nathaniel Gorham took over the Chairmanship until John Hancock resigned. Each Colony/State elected delegates to the Continental Congress and the United States, in Congress Assembled. From 1774 to 1788 the delegates elected fifteen Presidents with only one declining to serve. Each State, regardless of population or the size of their delegation, had only one vote in both the Continental Congress and the United States, in Congress Assembled. Journals of The United States in Congress Assembled, October 16, 1781 – Stan Klos Collection – www.ForgottenFounders.org Articles of Association, passed October 20, 1774, named and organized the Continental Congress. Peyton Randolph, Henry Middleton and John Hancock served under the Colonial Articles of Association as Presidents of the Continental Congress of the United Colonies from September 5, 1774 to July 1, 1776. John Hancock, Henry Laurens, John Jay, and Samuel Huntington served as the Independent States Articles of Association as Presidents of Continental Congress of the United States from July 2, 1776 until March 1, 1781.
  • Lessons on the Constitution: Supplements to High School Courses in American Government and American History

    Lessons on the Constitution: Supplements to High School Courses in American Government and American History

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 235 096 SO 015 026 AUTHOR Patrick, John J.; Remy, Richard C. TITLE Lessons on the COnstitution: Supplements to High School Courses in American Government and American History. INSTITUTION Indiana Univ., Bloomington. Social Studies Development Center.; Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Mershon Center. SPONS AGENCY American Historical Association, Washington, D.C.; American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.; National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Jun 82 NOTE 601p.; Prepared for "Project '87." PUB TYPE' Guides - Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF03/PC25 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Case Studies; Change Strategies; *Constitutional History; Constitutional Law; Court Litigationi Decision Making Skills; High Schools; Lesson Plans; Primary Sources; Reading Materials; *United States Government (Course); *United States History; Units of Study IDENTIFIERS Constitutional Processes; Supreme Court ABSTRACT Designed to be used in combination with standard high school textbooks in U.S. history and government, these lessonson the U.S. Constitution can be used singly or in varying combinations and most can be completed in one or two class meetings. Thereare five chapters. Chapter Iis an introduction for teachers. Chapter II includes lessons about the origins andpurposes of the U.S. Constitution. The third chapter contains lessons about principles of governmental organization and power in the Constitution. ChapterIV has lessons that feature formal and informalmeans of constitutional change. The fifth chapter contains 20 digests of landmark Supreme Court cases. Worksheets containing questions to help'students analyze the cases are provid d. Students are expected to read andanswer questions regardinghe lesson selections, which include short readings, case studi s, and primary source materials.
  • FRSM Newsletter July 2016

    FRSM Newsletter July 2016

    Fort Recovery State Museum Newsletter July, 2016 Don't miss this one! Bill Iseminger July 17, 3:00 Site Manager, Author Nazarene Center "Cahokia Mounds" Handicapped Accessible America's First City Sound Amplified One of World's Largest Cities Free Signed Books Available St. Clair 5K - JULY 9 – 7:00: Registration Begins, 8:30 Cannon Blast !!! The St. Clair 5K is one of the most organized and most scenic 5K’s. This year participants will have 2 big murals added to their scenery! With the use of chip timing, this event is also extremely efficient with results reported and posted quickly/accurately. It’s not too late to sign up using the form on the Museum website: www.fortrecoverymuseum.com, or just come the day of the race, July 9 and sign up that morning. Shirts are particularly cool this year, but only a few will be available for those not pre-ordered. (You don't have to run to order the shirt!) Call 419-375-2123 for information. Thanks to Kathy and Tony Gonzalez and all the volunteers! Hats off to 225 Committee So many community people worked so hard to make the 225 Anniversary of Fort Recovery such an unforgettable one. Kudos especially to 225 Chairs: Michelle Dues and Jackie Leverette; Drama Directors: Judy Wood, Juli Kahlig and Conner Rammel; and the Fort Recovery Business History Book Author and Tour Guide, Helen LeFevre. Over 4000 people attended the drama and now have a better understanding of the history of Fort Recovery! The FR Business History Book sold out, but more will be re-ordered, call/email museum if you want one held for you.
  • Seedtime of an American Judiciary: from Independence to the Constitution

    Seedtime of an American Judiciary: from Independence to the Constitution

    William & Mary Law Review Volume 17 (1975-1976) Issue 3 Bicentennial Symposium: Constitutional Article 5 Government - Strengths, Weaknesses, Future March 1976 Seedtime of an American Judiciary: From Independence to the Constitution William F. Swindler William & Mary Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the President/Executive Department Commons Repository Citation William F. Swindler, Seedtime of an American Judiciary: From Independence to the Constitution, 17 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 503 (1976), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol17/iss3/5 Copyright c 1976 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr SEEDTIME OF AN AMERICAN JUDICIARY: FROM INDEPENDENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION WmLAm F. SWInDLER* THE CLOSiNG OF THE ROYAL COu-RTS In the increasing disputes between the colonies and the mother coun- try preceding the war for independence, the nature of law and of the courts in British North America periodically came into question. Colonial leaders pointed retrospectively to the assumption, embodied in the earliest colonial charters, that the common law, modified to apply to the local needs of each settlement or "plantation," was the root stock of American jurisprudence.1 Once the issue of the authority of the common law in the colonies was belatedly raised, English authorities countered with the declaration that neither the common law nor the English Constitu- tion followed the flag except as England decreed.2 Essentiallv, this was the impasse on which the hope of avoiding revolution ultimately perished. Although their authority to do so might be called into question, the colonies proceeded to adopt or adapt the common law, setting up sys- tems of courts resembling the judicial structure remembered from Eng- * John Marshall Professor of Law, College of William and Mary.
  • Answers and Solutions

    Answers and Solutions

    240 ANSWERS AND SOLUTIONS Kickshaws Dave Morice Recycled Palindromes: wrong, grown; tar, rat, art; Rot a rowan, gnaw orator Overlooked Anagrams: Each of these people were Presidents of the US before George Washington, who was elected under the constitution of 1789. Each of these pre-presidents held office for a single year: John Hanson (Nov 5 1781 to Nov 3 1782), Elias Boudinot (1783), Thomas Mifflin (1784), Richard Henry Lee (1785), Arthur St. Clair (17870 Cyrus Griffin (1788). The missing one is Nathan Gorman (1786). Letteral Limericks Henry is in Tennessee. Xavier is seeing Assisi I see he has eaten a bee. And having a tour of the city. He's using the bees Tuesday and Wednesday And insects as these The tour is for all day. To cure a benign allergy. He is using all his energy. Dictionary of Misinformation: A book for philatelists stamp collectors. The 25-cent, 3 I-page book's 27-word title seems to have three titles (underlined here) and two subtitles: The Stamp Finder TELLS COUNTRY TO WHICH ANY STAMP BELONGS, U.S. STAM P IDENTIFIER, HOW TO COLLECT POSTAGE STAMPS COLLECT STAMPS AND ENJOY THE WORLD'S MOST POPULAR HOBBY (Copyright 1954 by Philatelic Institute, Cambridge Mass.) The Speculation Puzzle Jeremi ah Farrell O-S IC, I-LIP, 2-0UI, 3-TAN, 4-UTE, 5-COP, 6-ACE, 7-LOT, 8-SEN, 9-SAL, X-PUN Dictionary Words Leonard Ashley I. Pollyanna optimism 2. armband 3. millennium 4. go home (Date of Estimated Return from OverSEas) 5. unhallow 6. insect noise 7.
  • The Dispute Between the Creek Nation and the State of Georgia: United States Diplomacy in the Formation of the Federal Union, 1784-1790

    The Dispute Between the Creek Nation and the State of Georgia: United States Diplomacy in the Formation of the Federal Union, 1784-1790

    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Theses UMSL Graduate Works 7-2-2009 The Dispute Between the Creek Nation and the State of Georgia: United States Diplomacy in the Formation of the Federal Union, 1784-1790 Michael William Beatty University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Beatty, Michael William, "The Dispute Between the Creek Nation and the State of Georgia: United States Diplomacy in the Formation of the Federal Union, 1784-1790" (2009). Theses. 176. https://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/176 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Dispute Between the Creek Nation and the State of Georgia: United States Diplomacy in the Formation of the Federal Union, 1784 – 1790 Michael William Beatty B.A. (History), The University of Missouri – St. Louis, 2006 B.A. (German), The University of Alabama, 1992 A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School at The University of Missouri – St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History August 2009 Advisory Committee J. Frederick Fausz, Ph.D., Chairman The University of Missouri – St. Louis Steven W. Rowan, Ph.D. The University of Missouri – St. Louis Peter J. Kastor, Ph.D. Washington University in St. Louis Copyright © 2009 by Michael William Beatty Beatty, Michael, UMSL, 2009, p.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
  • THE W Ilftal I the IW YORK CITY HALL, 1785-1788 Bauküroui I L EVALUATION STUDY

    THE W Ilftal I the IW YORK CITY HALL, 1785-1788 Bauküroui I L EVALUATION STUDY

    Trh.., fîgTfW - ■f 3 77//3'/f7'. THE W IlfTAL I THE IW YORK CITY HALL, 1785-1788 BAUKÜROUi i l EVALUATION STUDY MAY 1969 THE c o m IN THE IW YORK1785-1788 CITY HALL, Historian JOHN D. R. PLATT DIVISION OF HISTORY MAY 1969 OFFICE OF ARCHEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PAIN SENVICE PREFACE The Continental Congress has been the subject of forty-two volumes of published journals and letters and one history. Yet, it has still to receive full historical treatment. The comprehen­ sive history of the Congress as a political instrumentality, the human history of that generation of leaders who attended its meetings seems to have been discouraged rather than encouraged by the wealth of available sources. And one looks in vain for adequate coverage of the Congress in standard works. The American Revolution has been written about at length as a revolution; since Fiske the Confed­ eration period has been interpreted and reinterpreted--with but passing reference to the Continental Congress. All of which conspires to make a study of this dimension more difficult than it should be. The writer has had to work his way back to the unpublished papers of the Congress and ferret out a grain of opinion here, a trace of substance there from a wide range of other sources to recapture a sense of the Congress while in New York City. This study was prepared under RSP FEHA-H-9 to provide materials and evaluation wanted for exhibits on the Continental Congress in the New York City Hall of the 1780’s.

  • 023 Griffin Family Letters September 15, 1912.Pdf

    2127 Jackson Place, Chicago, Ill September 15, 1912 Mr Charles Griffen Grassland, Ills Mr Justus A. Griffin 14-16 Rebecca St Hamilton, Can. Mr Charles Field Griffen Mamaroneck, N.Y. Gentleman:- I return form a vacation in the Adirondacks, N.Y. last week, and was happily surprised to receive a visit form Mr. Andrew w. Griffin, of 561 So 26th Ave, Omaha, Neb., who brought with him ten volumes, and left them with me ,of his genealogical notes of our family, collected by him and Mr Miller of Brooklyn, N. Y.. These volumes contain a very full record of the descendants of John Griffen, of Flushing, L.I. and also the names of our people, scattered all over the United States and the Dominion of Canada, whose ancestors he nor any one else can ever trace back to Richard and John of Flushing. And what pleases me much, is to find that his and Mr. Miller’s record, so accurately agrees with my recent researches of our records here. We have - all three of us, worked form ancestors down to the latest descendants, and then from the latest descendants backward to the ancestors - and with the help of records, and Coat of Arms sent me by Mr Justus A. G. of Hamilton, Ont, I think that we have discovered the correct Coast of Arms, of our great ancestor , Richard Griffith, the powerful, aged and noble Welsh chieftain, who so ably assisted Henry Tudor to obtain the Crown of England, as Henry VIIth, at the battle of Bosworth field, in 1485.

  • The Articles of Confederation William F

    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Popular Media Faculty and Deans 1981 Our First Constitution: The Articles of Confederation William F. Swindler William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Swindler, William F., "Our First Constitution: The Articles of Confederation" (1981). Popular Media. 262. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/popular_media/262 Copyright c 1981 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/popular_media The "united States in Congress assembled" came into being 200 years ago with ratification of the Articles of Confederation. By William F. Swindler THE period of the nation's bicentennial, right ought to be, free and independent from independence to the final im- States." This resolution was in fact one plementation of the federal government of three related proposals, the second under the Constitution to be observed calling for the seeking of foreign al- in 1987-89, includes several events less liances for the coming war with Great familiar in history but significant in Britain, and the third stating "That a their own place and time. In 1979 was plan of confederation be proposed and the bicentennial of legal education transmitted to the respective Colonies marked by the founding of the chair of for their consideration and approba- law at the College of William and Mary tion." on December 4, 1779 (see 64 A.B.A.J. These resolutions in themselves 1872). In 1981 will come two events- marked a transitional step in American the final ratification of the Articles of constitutional thought.