DOCSLIB.ORG

Black Plague Claims Researcher

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Black Plague Claims Researcher Is there hope for containment by drugs and vaccines? Current Research on Ebola Treatments Under a magnification of 25,000X, this digitally-colorized scanning electron bola continues to micrograph (SEM) depicts numerous plague West Africa as filamentous Ebola virus particles (red) E budding from a chronically-infected it infringes upon the USA. VERO E6 cell (blue). From the NIAID. Meanwhile, there is a scrambleA to develop and specific to the proteins of approve new treatment Ebola. The antibodies are options for this deadly designed to disease. bind and neutralize the Ebola virus. ZMAPP has been used By Christopher Massey Several promising on an emergency basis to treat November, 2014 vaccinations and therapies some victims of Ebola. have been developed over the last couple of decades, but However, due to the limited they have yet to be thoroughly number of doses produced, Christopher Massey is the tested for use in humans. the safety and efficacy of Research and Development Some treatments have been ZMAPP has not been fully Manager at Hardy Diagnostics. tried on human subjects in determined. ZMAPP is emergency situations, but produced in genetically He earned his degree in their safety and efficacy are engineered tobacco plants, microbiology at Cal Poly in still unknown. which makes the production San Luis Obispo, California. of new doses a slow process. Phase 1 trials are being HardyDiagnostics.com ZMAPP planned and are expected to start soon. The most widely publicized proposed treatment is ZMAPP. This therapeutic agent, developed by MAPP Biopharmaceutical, is a chimera of three separate monoclonal antibodies with Marburg virus were also significant benefit of TEKMIRA protected when BCX-4430 Brincidofovir is that it can be was administered up to 48 taken orally as a tablet and is Tekmira has answered with a hours after infection. This shelf-stable at room cocktail of three siRNAs would make this therapy an temperature, making this a (Small Interfering RNAs) option for people accidentally choice therapy for against Ebola packaged as exposed to the virus. Aside introduction to the third world lipid nanoparticles. These from filoviruses, BCX-4430 if proven effective. lipid nanoparticles supposedly has demonstrated encapsulate the siRNAs and broad-spectrum activity deliver them through the against more than 20 RNA FAVIPIRAVIR bloodstream to target cells, viruses in nine different where they are then families, including filoviruses, Toyama Chemical’s transported into the cell. Once togaviruses, bunyaviruses, Favipiravir was primarily inside the cell, siRNA’s bind arenaviruses, developed as a stockpiled with viral RNA and signal its paramyxoviruses, therapeutic drug against degradation. coronaviruses and influenza outbreaks. The drug, flaviviruses. Phase 1 trials are with a broad spectrum of Tekmira began Phase 1 trials expected to be underway activity against RNA viruses, early this year, and the drug soon. has been proposed for use in has been used on patients on treating Ebola. Its mechanism an emergency basis. The drug of action is through selective has been shown to be 100% BRINCIDOFIVIR inhibition of viral RNA- effective in monkeys infected dependant RNA polymerase. with a 1995 strain of the Chimerix’s Brincidofivir is Unlike Brincidofovir, there is Ebola Zaire virus. similar, a broad-spectrum no evidence to indicate that antiviral which selectively Favipiravir has any effect on disrupts the viral DNA eukaryotic polymerases. Mice BCX-4430 polymerase complex. This studies have shown 100% drug has shown effectivity recovery of mice infected BioCryst has gone the route of against dsDNA viruses like with Ebola if treated with a broad spectrum anti- cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, Favipiravir within six days of retroviral. BCX-4430 is an BK virus, smallpox, infection. Favipiravir is in RNA polymerase inhibitor, and herpes simplex virus and Phase III trials in the U.S. for which binds to the active site it is in phase III trials against influenza treatment, and used by the viral polymerase cytomegalovirus and Toyama Chemicals states that and becomes incorporated adenovirus. The drug has also they have over 20,000 doses into transcripts, thus been shown effective in vitro of the drug stockpiled for use. disrupting transcription via against Ebola (even though chain termination. A Nature the virus is an RNA virus) and paper released in March of has been administered to PLASMA TRANSFUSION this year showed that BCX- some patients on an 4430 injected intramuscularly emergency basis. The FDA For a more traditional after infection with Ebola and has approved Phase II trials treatment, blood plasma Marburg virus protected against Ebola to begin in transfusion from recovered rodents. Macaques infected infected patients. One Ebola victims to infected patients has been proposed as altogether. a course of action. A paper Another potential option uses released in 1999 described the NIAID/GSK is working on Vesicular Stomatitis Virus as administration of plasma from two versions of the same a vector to deliver Ebola convalescent Ebola victims to vaccination which uses a non- glycoprotein genes to target eight infected Ebola patients. replicating chimpanzee cells. A major difference Only one of the eight patients adenovirus to deliver one or between this vaccination and died, showing that plasma two Ebola glycoproteins into the NIAID/GSK vaccination transfusion may be a possible human cells. One is for the is that VSV-EBOV is method of treatment. Zaire strain of Ebola; the replication-competent. Studies other is for the Sudan strain as on macaques show that well as the Zaire strain. vaccination may be effective after a single treatment and The adenovirus injection is that the vaccine may be boosted with a modified administered orally or intra- vaccinia virus for immediate nasally, greatly aiding in the and lasting protection. Once deployment of the vaccine to the virus enters the cell, the target areas of low resources. sequence for glycoprotein recombines into the host Antibodies from the DNA, and the cell begins convalescent victim would be producing it. transferred to the patient, which would then fight the When the immune system virus in the patient. The recognizes the Ebola effectiveness of this treatment glycoprotein, it responds with is largely unknown, but it may antibody production and B- serve as a stop-gap treatment cell proliferation, generating until other therapies can be immunity against the virus. properly developed and approved. The use of a human adenovirus was not utilized Similar to the NIAID/GSK due to natural immunity in vaccine, Crucell VACCINES some of the population to the Biopharmaceuticals is adenovirus itself, rendering developing a recombinant While some are developing the vaccination ineffective for adenovirus to deliver treatments for those already some recipients. multiple-vector protection infected, some are working on against Ebola and Marburg vaccines to stop the disease In a challenge study, all four virus. Marburg virus is a macaques given the similar filovirus which causes vaccination showed robust intermittent outbreaks of protection against Ebola virus. hemorrhagic disease in The vaccination is currently in humans. Testing is currently Phase 1 trials for safety which being conducted to determine are expected to complete in the most effective construct. December of 2014. This vaccination is planned for clinical trials in late 2015/early 2016. While these treatments and vaccines are still in their early stages, it is encouraging that there are several options in development to combat this devastating disease. Chris Massey Santa Maria, CA .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MARBURG HEMORRHAGIC FEVER (Marburg HF)
    MARBURG HEMORRHAGIC FEVER (Marburg HF) REPORTING INFORMATION • Class A: Report immediately via telephone the case or suspected case and/or a positive laboratory result to the local public health department where the patient resides. If patient residence is unknown, report immediately via telephone to the local public health department in which the reporting health care provider or laboratory is located. Local health departments should report immediately via telephone the case or suspected case and/or a positive laboratory result to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH). • Reporting Form(s) and/or Mechanism: o Immediately via telephone. o For local health departments, cases should also be entered into the Ohio Disease Reporting System (ODRS) within 24 hours of the initial telephone report to the ODH. • Key fields for ODRS reporting include: import status (whether the infection was travel-associated or Ohio-acquired), date of illness onset, and all the fields in the Epidemiology module. AGENT Marburg hemorrhagic fever is a rare, severe type of hemorrhagic fever which affects both humans and non-human primates. Caused by a genetically unique zoonotic RNA virus of the family Filoviridae, its recognition led to the creation of this virus family. The five species of Ebola virus are the only other known members of the family Filoviridae. Marburg virus was first recognized in 1967, when outbreaks of hemorrhagic fever occurred simultaneously in laboratories in Marburg and Frankfurt, Germany and in Belgrade, Yugoslavia (now Serbia). A total of 31 people became ill, including laboratory workers as well as several medical personnel and family members who had cared for them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Ebola Virus VP40 Matrix Protein-Based Screening for Identification of Novel Candidate Medical Countermeasures
    viruses Communication A Novel Ebola Virus VP40 Matrix Protein-Based Screening for Identification of Novel Candidate Medical Countermeasures Ryan P. Bennett 1,† , Courtney L. Finch 2,† , Elena N. Postnikova 2 , Ryan A. Stewart 1, Yingyun Cai 2 , Shuiqing Yu 2 , Janie Liang 2, Julie Dyall 2 , Jason D. Salter 1 , Harold C. Smith 1,* and Jens H. Kuhn 2,* 1 OyaGen, Inc., 77 Ridgeland Road, Rochester, NY 14623, USA; [email protected] (R.P.B.); [email protected] (R.A.S.); [email protected] (J.D.S.) 2 NIH/NIAID/DCR/Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick (IRF-Frederick), Frederick, MD 21702, USA; courtney.fi[email protected] (C.L.F.); [email protected] (E.N.P.); [email protected] (Y.C.); [email protected] (S.Y.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (J.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.C.S.); [email protected] (J.H.K.); Tel.: +1-585-697-4351 (H.C.S.); +1-301-631-7245 (J.H.K.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Filoviruses, such as Ebola virus and Marburg virus, are of significant human health concern. From 2013 to 2016, Ebola virus caused 11,323 fatalities in Western Africa. Since 2018, two Ebola virus disease outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of the Congo resulted in 2354 fatalities. Although there is progress in medical countermeasure (MCM) development (in particular, vaccines and antibody- based therapeutics), the need for efficacious small-molecule therapeutics remains unmet. Here we describe a novel high-throughput screening assay to identify inhibitors of Ebola virus VP40 matrix protein association with viral particle assembly sites on the interior of the host cell plasma membrane.
    [Show full text]
  • MARBURG VIRUS [African Hemorrhagic Fever, Green Or Vervet Monkey Disease]
    MARBURG VIRUS [African Hemorrhagic Fever, Green or Vervet Monkey Disease] SPECIES: Nonhuman primates, especially african green monkeys & macaques AGENT: Agent is classified as a Filovirus. It is an RNA virus, superficially resembling rhabdoviruses but has bizarre branching and filamentous or tubular forms shared with no other known virus group on EM. The only other member of this class of viruses is ebola virus. RESERVOIR AND INCIDENCE: An acute highly fatal disease first described in Marburg, Germany in 1967. Brought to Marburg in a shipment of infected African Green Monkeys from Uganda. 31 people were affected and 7 died in 1967. Exposure to tissue and blood from African Green monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) or secondary contact with infected humans led to the disease. No disease occurred in people who handled only intact animals or those who wore gloves and protective clothing when handling tissues. A second outbreak was reported in Africa in 1975 involving three people with no verified contact with monkeys. Third and fourth outbreaks in Kenya 1980 and 1987. Natural reservoir is unknown. Monkeys thought to be accidental hosts along with man. Antibodies have been found in African Green monkeys, baboons, and chimpanzees. 100% fatal in experimentally infected African Green Monkeys, Rhesus, squirrel monkeys, guinea pigs, and hamsters. TRANSMISSION: Direct contact with infected blood or tissues or close contact with infected patients. Virus has also been found in semen, saliva, and urine. DISEASE IN NONHUMAN PRIMATES: No clinical signs occur in green monkeys, but the disease is usually fatal after experimental infection of other primate species. Leukopenia and petechial hemorrhages throughout the body of experimentally infected monkeys, sometimes with GI hemorrhages.
    [Show full text]
  • How Severe and Prevalent Are Ebola and Marburg Viruses?
    Nyakarahuka et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2016) 16:708 DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-2045-6 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access How severe and prevalent are Ebola and Marburg viruses? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the case fatality rates and seroprevalence Luke Nyakarahuka1,2,5* , Clovice Kankya2, Randi Krontveit3, Benjamin Mayer4, Frank N. Mwiine2, Julius Lutwama5 and Eystein Skjerve1 Abstract Background: Ebola and Marburg virus diseases are said to occur at a low prevalence, but are very severe diseases with high lethalities. The fatality rates reported in different outbreaks ranged from 24–100%. In addition, sero-surveys conducted have shown different seropositivity for both Ebola and Marburg viruses. We aimed to use a meta-analysis approach to estimate the case fatality and seroprevalence rates of these filoviruses, providing vital information for epidemic response and preparedness in countries affected by these diseases. Methods: Published literature was retrieved through a search of databases. Articles were included if they reported number of deaths, cases, and seropositivity. We further cross-referenced with ministries of health, WHO and CDC databases. The effect size was proportion represented by case fatality rate (CFR) and seroprevalence. Analysis was done using the metaprop command in STATA. Results: The weighted average CFR of Ebola virus disease was estimated to be 65.0% [95% CI (54.0–76.0%), I2 = 97.98%] whereas that of Marburg virus disease was 53.8% (26.5–80.0%, I2 = 88.6%). The overall seroprevalence of Ebola virus was 8.0% (5.0%–11.0%, I2 = 98.7%), whereas that for Marburg virus was 1.2% (0.5–2.0%, I2 = 94.8%).
    [Show full text]
  • Taï Forest Virus Does Not Cause Lethal Disease in Ferrets
    microorganisms Article Taï Forest Virus Does Not Cause Lethal Disease in Ferrets Zachary Schiffman 1,2,† , Feihu Yan 3,†, Shihua He 2, Kevin Tierney 2, Wenjun Zhu 2 , Karla Emeterio 1,2, Huajun Zhang 1, Logan Banadyga 2,* and Xiangguo Qiu 2 1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada; [email protected] (Z.S.); [email protected] (K.E.); [email protected] (H.Z.) 2 Special Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada; [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (K.T.); [email protected] (W.Z.); [email protected] (X.Q.) 3 Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally. Abstract: Filoviruses are zoonotic, negative-sense RNA viruses, most of which are capable of causing severe disease in humans and nonhuman primates, often with high case fatality rates. Among these viruses, those belonging to the Ebolavirus genus—particularly Ebola virus, Sudan virus, and Bundibugyo virus—represent some of the most pathogenic to humans. Taï Forest virus (TAFV) is thought to be among the least pathogenic ebolaviruses; however, only a single non-fatal case has been documented in humans, in 1994. With the recent success of the ferret as a lethal model for a number of ebolaviruses, we set out to evaluate its suitability as a model for TAFV. Our results demonstrate that, unlike other ebolaviruses, TAFV infection in ferrets does not result in lethal disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola and Marburg Virus Disease Epidemics: Preparedness, Alert, Control and Evaluation
    EBOLA STRATEGY Ebola and Marburg virus disease epidemics: preparedness, alert, control and evaluation August 2014 © World Health Organization 2014. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. WHO/HSE/PED/CED/2014.05 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 5 List of abbreviations and acronyms ................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1 – Introduction .................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Purpose of the document and target audience ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Disease Fact Sheet
    WISCONSIN DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH Department of Health Services Viral Hemorrhagic Fever (Ebola Virus Hemorrhagic Fever, Marburg Virus Hemorrhagic Fever) Disease Fact Sheet Series What is viral hemorrhagic fever? Viral hemorrhagic fever is the collective name given to the diseases caused by a group of viruses such as Ebola virus and Marburg virus. The Ebola virus was named for the river in Zaire where it was discovered. Marburg virus was named for the city in Germany where the disease was first diagnosed. Viral hemorrhagic fever begins with fever and muscle aches and can result in a relatively mild illness or can lead to death. Where do these viruses come from? Although the source of these viruses in nature is unknown, this group of viruses can occasionally be found in rodents, ticks, and mosquitoes within endemic areas. Monkeys and humans are also susceptible and may become a source of virus if they become infected. Tissues of infected primates can also serve as a source of infection to staff in laboratories or in import and quarantine facilities that handle primates. How common are Ebola and Marburg viruses? To date, there have been four known outbreaks of Ebola virus involving humans; two in Sudan (1976, 1979) and two in Zaire (1976, 1995). Two small outbreaks of Marburg virus in humans occurred in Germany and Yugoslavia in 1967 but were linked to sources of virus in Africa. In most of the outbreaks of Ebola virus infection, the majority of cases occurred in hospital settings where inadequate medical supplies resulted in poor infection control practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Marburg Hemorrhagic Fever
    Marburg Hemorrhagic Fever Marburg hemorrhagic fever (Marburg HF) is a rare but severe hemorrhagic fever which affects both humans and non-human primates. Marburg HF is caused by Marburg virus, a genetically unique zoonotic (or, animal-borne) RNA virus of the filovirus family. The five species of Ebola virus are the only other known members of the filovirus family. Marburg virus was first recognized in 1967, when outbreaks of hemorrhagic fever occurred simultaneously in laboratories in Marburg and Frankfurt, Germany and in Belgrade, Yugoslavia (now Serbia). Thirty-one people became ill, initially laboratory workers followed by several medical personnel and family members who had cared for them. Seven deaths were reported. The first people infected had been exposed to imported African green monkeys or their tissues while conducting research. One additional case was diagnosed retrospectively. The reservoir host of Marburg virus is the African fruit bat, Rousettus aegyptiacus. Fruit bats infected with Marburg virus do not to show obvious signs of illness. Primates (including humans) can become infected with Marburg virus, and may develop serious disease with high mortality. Further study is needed to determine if other species may also host the virus. This Rousettus bat is a sighted, cave-dwelling bat widely distributed across Africa. Given the fruit bat's wide distribution, more areas are potentially at risk for outbreaks of Marburg HF than previously suspected. The virus is not known to be native to other continents, such as North America. Marburg HF typically appears in sporadic outbreaks throughout Africa; laboratory confirmed cases have been reported in Uganda, Zimbabwe, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Angola, and South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Filovirus Fact Sheet
    Filovirus Fact Sheet What are Filoviruses? Filoviruses belong to a virus family called Filoviridae and can cause severe hemorrhagic fever in humans and nonhuman primates. So far, only two members of this virus family have been identified: Marburg virus and Ebola virus. Four species of Ebola virus have been identified: Ivory Coast, Sudan, Zaire, and Reston. Ebola-Reston is the only known filovirus that does not cause severe disease in humans; however, it can be fatal in monkeys. Structurally, filovirus virions (complete viral particles) may appear in several shapes, a biological feature called pleomorphism. These shapes include long, sometimes branched filaments, as well as shorter filaments shaped like a "6", a "U", or a circle. Viral Negative stain image of an isolate of Marburg virus, showing filamentous particles as well as the characteristic "Shepherd's filaments may measure up to 14,000 nanometers in Crook". Magnification approximately 100,000 times. Image length, have a uniform diameter of 80 nanometers, courtesy of Russell Regnery, Ph.D., DVRD, NCID, CDC. and are enveloped in a lipid (fatty) membrane. Each virion contains one molecule of single-stranded, negative-sense RNA. New viral particles are created by budding from the surface of their hosts’ cells; however, filovirus replication strategies are not completely understood. When were the members of the filovirus family first recognized? The first filovirus was recognized in 1967 when a number of laboratory workers in Germany and Yugoslavia, who were handling tissues from green monkeys, developed hemorrhagic fever. A total of 31 cases and seven deaths were associated with these outbreaks. The virus was named after Marburg, Germany, the site of one of the outbreaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Genomics in Ebola Virus Research
    REVIEWS Viral genomics in Ebola virus research Nicholas Di Paola1, Mariano Sanchez- Lockhart1, Xiankun Zeng1, Jens H. Kuhn2 and Gustavo Palacios 1 ✉ Abstract | Filoviruses such as Ebola virus continue to pose a substantial health risk to humans. Advances in the sequencing and functional characterization of both pathogen and host genomes have provided a wealth of knowledge to clinicians, epidemiologists and public health responders during outbreaks of high- consequence viral disease. Here, we describe how genomics has been historically used to investigate Ebola virus disease outbreaks and how new technologies allow for rapid, large- scale data generation at the point of care. We highlight how genomics extends beyond consensus-level sequencing of the virus to include intra- host viral transcriptomics and the characterization of host responses in acute and persistently infected patients. Similar genomics techniques can also be applied to the characterization of non- human primate animal models and to known natural reservoirs of filoviruses, and metagenomic sequencing can be the key to the discovery of novel filoviruses. Finally , we outline the importance of reverse genetics systems that can swiftly characterize filoviruses as soon as their genome sequences are available. Next- generation sequencing Infections with viruses of the mononegaviral fam- requires more detailed genomic information than virus 6 A collection of continuously ily Filoviridae (in particular, members of the genera consensus- genome sequencing. Indeed, as predicted , evolving technologies and Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus) are an increasing threat metagenomic sequencing has become a powerful tool for techniques that allow for the to mankind. Until recently, the infrequent spillover of identifying novel viruses and, crucially, for predicting digitalization of genomic 7 material.
    [Show full text]
  • Benzamides As Potent Entry Inhibitors of Ebola and Marburg Virus Infections
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author J Med Chem Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2021 July 09. Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2020 July 09; 63(13): 7211–7225. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00463. Discovery and Structural Optimization of 4- (Aminomethyl)benzamides as Potent Entry Inhibitors of Ebola and Marburg Virus Infections Irina N. Gaisina*,†,‡, Norton P. Peet*,‡, Letitia Wong‡, Adam M. Schafer∥, Han Cheng∥, Manu Anantpadma⊥,§, Robert A. Davey⊥,§, Gregory R. J. Thatcher†, Lijun Rong*,∥ †UICentre (Drug Discovery @ UIC) and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States ‡Chicago BioSolutions Inc., 2242 W Harrison Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States ∥College of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 909 S Wolcott Ave, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States ⊥Texas Biomedical Research Institute, 8715 W Military Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78227, United States §Department of Microbiology, Boston University, 620 Albany Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States Abstract The recent Ebola epidemics in West Africa underscore the great need for effective and practical therapies for future Ebola virus outbreaks. We have discovered a new series of remarkably potent small molecule inhibitors of Ebola virus entry. These 4-(aminomethyl)benzamide-based inhibitors are also effective against Marburg virus. Synthetic routes to these compounds allowed for the preparation of a wide variety of structures, including a conformationally restrained subset of indolines (compounds 41–50). Compounds 20, 23, 32, 33, and 35 are superior inhibitors of Ebola (Mayinga) and Marburg (Angola) infectious viruses.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Filoviridae: Marburg and Ebola Viruses
    Introduction and History Characteristics of In 1967 outbreaks of hemorrhagic fever occurred si- Filoviridae: Marburg and multaneously in Germany (Marburg and Frankfurt), and Yugoslavia (Belgrade) among laboratory work- Ebola Viruses ers having contact with tissues and blood from Afri- can green monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) im- Brigitte Beer, Reinhard Kurth ported from Uganda. A total of 31 cases in humans Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Paul-Ehrlich-Strasse with seven fatalities occurred [74, 77]. Subsequently 51–59, D-63225 Langen, Germany a virus was isolated from blood and tissues of the patients by inoculation of guinea pigs and cell cul- tures [46, 50, 74, 75] and the virus was named Mar- Alexander Bukreyev burg virus after the city in which it was first charac- Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National terized (Table 1). The virus also appeared to be Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, highly pathogenic for monkeys, killing all African Bethesda, MD 20892-0720, USA green monkeys experimentally infected with the vi- rus [35]. After this dramatic episode the virus disappeared from sight until 1975, when three cases of Marburg hemorrhagic fever were reported in Johannesburg, South Africa [18, 33]. The index case patient died 12 days after onset of the disease, while two patients infected secondarily survived. The next Marburg vi- rus outbreak occurred in 1980 when one index pa- Filoviruses are enveloped, nonsegmented nega- tient became ill and finally died in Kenya and an at- tive-stranded RNA viruses. The two species, tending physician became infected but survived. In Marburg and Ebola virus, are serologically, 1987 a single fatal Marburg case was reported in biochemically, and genetically distinct.
    [Show full text]