Oral Adverse Events Associated with Targeted Cancer Therapies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oral Adverse Events Associated with Targeted Cancer Therapies Oral adverse events associated with targeted cancer therapies Milda Chmieliauskaite, DMD, MPH ¢ Ivan Stojanov, DMD ¢ Mana Saraghi, DMD Andres Pinto, DMD, MPH, MSCE, MBA, FDSRCS (Edin) Over the past decade, targeted therapies have emerged ancer is the second-leading cause of death in the as promising forms of cancer treatment and are increas- United States. At some point in time, many dental ingly included in chemotherapeutic regimens for an patients will be undergoing cancer treatment. ever-growing list of human cancers. Targeted therapies C Conventional chemotherapeutic agents are cytotoxic to all repli- are so-named due to their specific targeting of dysregu- cating cells and do not target specific cancer cells; many adverse lated signaling pathways in cancer cells. This enhanced effects are attributable to this lack of discrimination. Many new discrimination between tumor and normal cells is a more cancer drugs are referred to as targeted therapy because they promising and efficacious approach to cancer treatment target dysregulated signaling pathways specific to a particular than conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, tar- type of cancer to inhibit cancer cell growth or survival. As geted therapies still have side effects, and some manifest these therapies do not simply target any and all replicating cells, in the oral cavity. Oral adverse events tend to be mild their effects promise to be more specific than conventional 1 and thus may be overlooked in the context of a patient’s chemotherapy. overarching diagnosis and management. These oral Despite an improvement in their overall side effect profile, lesions are often noted during an intraoral examination targeted therapies still manifest adverse effects, including oral and identified in the context of the patient’s medical his- and perioral lesions. This is not an entirely surprising observa- tory and medication list. It is imperative that the dentist tion, given that many signaling pathways dysregulated in human 1 be informed of the oral sequelae of targeted therapies. neoplasia also serve physiologic roles in normal cells. Many of these side effects can be successfully managed Targeted therapies come in various forms, such as monoclonal in a palliative manner with conservative therapy. This antibodies, small molecules, or protein kinase inhibitors, and 2 article discusses the clinical presentations and treatment most can target several pathways. More specifically, targeted of intraoral adverse events attributable to the following cancer therapies can be classified by the molecule or pathway classes of targeted therapies: epidermal growth factor targeted. These categories include, but are not limited to, epi- receptor inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin dermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors; inhibitors of inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors, and selected tyrosine the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR); platelet-derived kinase inhibitors. growth factor receptor (PDGFR) inhibitors; vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors; Received: November 3, 2017 multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors; human epidermal Revised: February 26, 2018 growth factor 2 (HER2) inhibitors; BRAF inhibitors; and CD20 Accepted: March 26, 2018 antigen inhibitors. Targeted cancer therapy is sometimes used as monotherapy but can also be combined with conventional 2,3 Key words: cancer, oral adverse events, targeted therapy chemotherapy or radiation. It is important for dentists to be familiar with the oral, head, and neck adverse events associated with targeted cancer therapy. This review presents the most common intraoral adverse events and discusses management strategies that have been reported in the literature. Targeted therapies and associated oral adverse events Published with permission of the Academy of General Dentistry. The oral adverse events associated with targeted cancer © Copyright 2018 by the Academy of General Dentistry. therapies may differ substantially from adverse events result- All rights reserved. For printed and electronic reprints of this article ing from conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies. Table 1 lists for distribution, please contact [email protected]. the oral adverse events associated with particular targeted chemotherapies. EGFR inhibitors EGFR inhibitors were among the first targeted therapies Exercise No. 426, p. 32 developed for the treatment of epithelial tumors, including Subject code: Special Patient Care (750) breast, colorectal, kidney, oral, oropharyngeal, and non–small 3-5 cell lung cancers. EGFR inhibitors target and antagonize the 26 GENERAL DENTISTRY September/October 2018 Table 1. Commonly reported oral adverse events in targeted therapy. Targeted therapy Common oral adverse events EGFR inhibitors Cetuximab, panitumumab, erlotinib, Mucositis, dysgeusia, xerostomia, geographic tongue, gefitinib, lapatinib, canertinib, vandetanib dysphagia, pharyngitis; cetuximab or panitumumab may potentiate radiation- or chemotherapy-induced mucositis mTOR inhibitors Sirolimus, temsirolimus, everolimus, Mucosal inflammation, mTOR inhibitor–associated ridaforolimus stomatitis (aphthouslike ulcers), dysgeusia, mouth pain, pharyngitis, dysphagia Hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor Vismodegib Dysgeusia BRAF inhibitors Dabrafenib, vemurafenib Hyperkeratotic lesions, increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma Angiogenesis inhibitors and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors Bevacizumab, axitinib, sunitinib, sorafenib, Mucosal sensitivity or pain, erythema, dysgeusia, pazopanib, cabozantinib, regorafenib, hypogeusia, ulceration, xerostomia, paresthesia, afatinib dimaleate, dacomitinib anesthesia, MRONJ, voice changes, hoarse voice, throat pain, tooth pain (sorafenib tosylate), lichenoid reactions; sunitinib may cause palatal mucosal pigmentation Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; MRONJ, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin. 8 ligand-binding domain of EGFR, blocking downstream signaling and other malignant processes. Since the HER family signaling and subsequent cell growth and division. pathways are normally involved in cell growth and differentia- The most common adverse events associated with EGFR tion, including those of epithelial cells, it is not surprising that inhibitors affect the skin, including the head and neck region; the most frequent adverse event reported for pan-HER tyrosine 7,8 the reaction frequently appears as a papulopustular eruption kinase inhibitors is mucositis. Afatinib has been approved 1,3 with distribution along the trunk and head/neck. Additional for the use of EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer, and dermatologic reactions that may occur include xerosis, alopecia, dacomitinib is in the clinical trial phase, yet both have been 3 7 paronychia, onycholysis, and photosensitivity. Adverse events reported to induce mucositis of varying grades. in the oral cavity are most commonly mucositis and less com- Mucositis associated with pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors monly dysgeusia, dysphagia, geographic tongue, pharyngitis, tends to present as erythema of the nonkeratinized mucosa with 3-5 7 and xerostomia. The oral mucositis generated by EGFR inhibi- superficial ulceration and may also involve the lips. Another 6 tors can range in presentation from erythema to ulceration. drug, lapatinib, a dual kinase inhibitor of EGFR and HER2, Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets EGFR, is can cause low-grade stomatitis as well as dysgeusia and taste 3 used in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, often in com- alterations. 1,7 bination with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Among EGFR inhibitors, cetuximab produces the greatest variety of mTOR inhibitors 3 oral adverse events. Furthermore, the addition of cetuximab mTOR inhibitors (such as sirolimus) have been widely used in or panitumumab to conventional chemotherapy or radiation the setting of graft-versus-host disease and solid organ trans- 9 therapy has been found to potentiate expected toxicities, such plantation and more recently are used in solid tumor oncology. 1,3,7 as mucositis. When cetuximab is used as stand-alone therapy, Temsirolimus, a kinase inhibitor, is indicated for use in renal cell mucositis is often mild, and thus dose modification or cessation carcinoma. Everolimus is indicated for advanced neuroendo- 7 of treatment is not recommended. crine tumors of the pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, or lung as well as HER2-negative breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and 10 Pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors several other less common tumors. Overexpression of the HER family signaling pathways plays Aphthouslike ulcers, often called mTOR inhibitor–associated a role in tumor progression, angiogenesis, metastatic spread, stomatitis (mIAS), are the most common oral adverse events agd.org/generaldentistry 27 Oral adverse events associated with targeted cancer therapies A B C Figure. Oral lesions associated with chemotherapy. A. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor–associated stomatitis (mIAS) associated with sirolimus. (Courtesy of Alessandro Villa, DDS, PhD, MPH, Boston, Massachusetts.) B & C. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy–associated mucositis. (Courtesy of Rui Amaral Mendes, DMD, PhD, Cleveland, Ohio.) 9,11 associated with mTOR inhibitors. The term mIAS is preferred or aflibercept in combination with 5-fluorouracil–based 15 to mucositis in the setting of mTOR inhibitors, as these lesions chemotherapy than in patients receiving chemotherapy
Recommended publications
  • Vandetanib-Eluting Beads for the Treatment of Liver Tumours
    VANDETANIB-ELUTING BEADS FOR THE TREATMENT OF LIVER TUMOURS ALICE HAGAN A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the University of Brighton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2018 ABSTRACT Drug-eluting bead trans-arterial chemo-embolisation (DEB-TACE) is a minimally invasive interventional treatment for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Drug loaded microspheres, such as DC Bead™ (Biocompatibles UK Ltd) are selectively delivered via catheterisation of the hepatic artery into tumour vasculature. The purpose of DEB-TACE is to physically embolise tumour-feeding vessels, starving the tumour of oxygen and nutrients, whilst releasing drug in a controlled manner. Due to the reduced systemic drug exposure, toxicity is greatly reduced. Embolisation-induced ischaemia is intended to cause tumour necrosis, however surviving hypoxic cells are known to activate hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1) which leads to the upregulation of several pro-survival and pro-angiogenic pathways. This can lead to tumour revascularisation, recurrence and poor treatment outcomes, providing a rationale for combining anti-angiogenic agents with TACE treatment. Local delivery of these agents via DEBs could provide sustained targeted therapy in combination with embolisation, reducing systemic exposure and therefore toxicity associated with these drugs. This thesis describes for the first time the loading of the DEB DC Bead and the radiopaque DC Bead LUMI™ with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor vandetanib. Vandetanib selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), two signalling receptors involved in angiogenesis and HCC pathogenesis. Physicochemical properties of vandetanib loaded beads such as maximum loading capacity, effect on size, radiopacity and drug distribution were evaluated using various analytical techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Low Level Laser Therapy in Oral Mucositis
    Mini Review JOJ Nurse Health Care Volume 9 Issue 5 - November 2018 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Clélea de Oliveira Calvet DOI: 10.19080/JOJNHC.2018.09.555774 Efficacy of Low Level Laser Therapy in Oral Mucositis Graça Maria Lopes Mattos¹, Cayara Mattos Costa²and Clélea de Oliveira Calvet3* 1CEUMA University, Brazil ²Federal University of Maranhão, Brazil 3Integrated Clinic Hospital, Brazil Submission: November 02, 2018; Published: November 30, 2018 *Corresponding author: Clélea de Oliveira Calvet , Integrated Clinic Hospital, Maranhão, Brazil Abstract Patients submitted to radiotherapy or chemotherapy induced antineoplastic therapy have as their sequel oral mucositis, which is the main complication arising from the treatment. Laser therapy is a modality that has grown in recent years, with evidences of significant improvements thein the lesion. prevention A literature and treatment review was of oralconducted mucositis. with This seven study publications aims to show in Portuguese the benefits and of low-level English in laser PubMed therapy and application SciELO databases, in patients from submitted 2008 to to antineoplastic therapy and present oral mucositis by means of an integrative literature review on the use of low-level laser to prevent and treat effects.2018 and a summary table was prepared. It was observed that low-level laser therapy is an effective tool in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in cancer patients, bringing benefits such as: reduction of pain and severity of the lesion and anti-inflammatory,
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,375.433 B2 Dilly Et Al
    US009375433B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,375.433 B2 Dilly et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jun. 28, 2016 (54) MODULATORS OF ANDROGENSYNTHESIS (52) U.S. Cl. CPC ............. A6 IK3I/519 (2013.01); A61 K3I/201 (71) Applicant: Tangent Reprofiling Limited, London (2013.01); A61 K3I/202 (2013.01); A61 K (GB) 31/454 (2013.01); A61K 45/06 (2013.01) (72) Inventors: Suzanne Dilly, Oxfordshire (GB); (58) Field of Classification Search Gregory Stoloff, London (GB); Paul USPC .................................. 514/258,378,379, 560 Taylor, London (GB) See application file for complete search history. (73) Assignee: Tangent Reprofiling Limited, London (56) References Cited (GB) U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,364,866 A * 1 1/1994 Strupczewski.......... CO7C 45/45 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 514,254.04 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 5,494.908 A * 2/1996 O’Malley ............. CO7D 261/20 514,228.2 This patent is Subject to a terminal dis 5,776,963 A * 7/1998 Strupczewski.......... CO7C 45/45 claimer. 514,217 6,977.271 B1* 12/2005 Ip ........................... A61K 31, 20 (21) Appl. No.: 14/708,052 514,560 OTHER PUBLICATIONS (22) Filed: May 8, 2015 Calabresi and Chabner (Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological (65) Prior Publication Data Basis of Therapeutics, 10th ed., 2001).* US 2015/O238491 A1 Aug. 27, 2015 (Cecil's Textbook of Medicine pp. 1060-1074 published 2000).* Stedman's Medical Dictionary (21st Edition, Published 2000).* Okamoto et al (Journal of Pain and Symptom Management vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of CI-1033, an Irreversible Pan-Erbb Tyrosine
    7112 Vol. 10, 7112–7120, November 1, 2004 Clinical Cancer Research Featured Article Administration of CI-1033, an Irreversible Pan-erbB Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Is Feasible on a 7-Day On, 7-Day Off Schedule: A Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Food Effect Study Emiliano Calvo,1 Anthony W. Tolcher,1 sorption and elimination adequately described the pharma- Lisa A. Hammond,1 Amita Patnaik,1 cokinetic disposition. CL/F, apparent volume of distribution ؎ ؎ 1 2 (Vd/F), and ka (mean relative SD) were 280 L/hour ؎Johan S. de Bono, Irene A. Eiseman, ؎ ؊1 2 2 33%, 684 L 20%, and 0.35 hour 69%, respectively. Stephen C. Olson, Peter F. Lenehan, C values were achieved in 2 to 4 hours. Systemic CI-1033 1 3 max Heather McCreery, Patricia LoRusso, and exposure was largely unaffected by administration of a high- 1 Eric K. Rowinsky fat meal. At 250 mg, concentration values exceeded IC50 1Institute for Drug Development, Cancer Therapy and Research values required for prolonged pan-erbB tyrosine kinase in- Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, hibition in preclinical assays. 2 San Antonio, Texas, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Conclusions: The recommended dose on this schedule is Arbor Laboratories, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 3Wayne State University, University Health Center, Detroit, Michigan 250 mg/day. Its tolerability and the biological relevance of concentrations achieved at the maximal tolerated dose war- rant consideration of disease-directed evaluations. This in- ABSTRACT termittent treatment schedule can be used without regard to Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of meals.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe, Ulcerative, Lichenoid Mucositis Associated with Secukinumab
    CASE REPORT Severe, ulcerative, lichenoid mucositis associated with secukinumab Jordan M. Thompson, BS,a Lisa M. Cohen, MD,b Catherine S. Yang, MD,c and George Kroumpouzos, MD, PhDc,d Providence, Rhode Island, and Lexington and South Weymouth, Massachusetts Key words: drug eruption; interleukin-17; lichenoid mucositis; secukinumab; tumor necrosis factor-a. INTRODUCTION Abbreviations used: Secukinumab is a new human monoclonal anti- body targeting interleukin (IL)-17A, a cytokine EM: erythema multiforme IL: interleukin involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. The US LP: lichen planus Food and Drug Administration approved secukinu- MMP: mucous membrane pemphigoid mab for psoriasis in 2015. Because the medication PV: pemphigus vulgaris TNF-a: tumor necrosis factor-a has been on the market for a short time, adverse events involving the oral mucosa are rarely reported. We report a case of severe, ulcerative, lichenoid mucositis associated with secukinumab use. cells (Figs 2 and 3). The presence of eosinophils and deeper inflammatory infiltrate (Fig 2) suggested a lichenoid drug eruption. Direct immunofluores- CASE REPORT cence of perilesional mucosa found nonspecific A 62-year-old white man underwent follow-up for basal epithelium staining for C3, IgG, and IgM. The long-standing, intractable, erythrodermic psoriasis. patient started using 0.1% triamcinolone in Orabase He did not respond to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) paste. It was not until approximately 6 weeks from inhibitors such as adalimumab and etanercept and secukinumab discontinuation and 1 week of steroid could not tolerate cyclosporine. Because metho- paste use that the labial lesions showed substantial trexate was only mildly efficacious, secukinumab improvement. was added.
    [Show full text]
  • Photobiomodulation for Taste Alteration
    Entry Photobiomodulation for Taste Alteration Marwan El Mobadder and Samir Nammour * Department of Dental Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-474-507-722 Definition: Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy employs light at red and near-infrared wavelengths to modulate biological activity. The therapeutic effect of PBM for the treatment or management of several diseases and injuries has gained significant popularity among researchers and clinicians, especially for the management of oral complications of cancer therapy. This entry focuses on the current evidence on the use of PBM for the management of a frequent oral complication due to cancer therapy—taste alteration. Keywords: dysgeusia; cancer complications; photobiomodulation; oral mucositis; laser therapy; taste alteration 1. Introduction Taste is one of the five basic senses, which also include hearing, touch, sight, and smell [1]. The three primary functions of this complex chemical process are pleasure, defense, and sustenance [1,2]. It is the perception derived from the stimulation of chemical molecule receptors in some specific locations of the oral cavity to code the taste qualities, in order to perceive the impact of the food on the organism, essentially [1,2]. An alteration Citation: El Mobadder, M.; of this typical taste functioning can be caused by various factors and is usually referred to Nammour, S. Photobiomodulation for as taste impairments, taste alteration, or dysgeusia [3,4]. Taste Alteration. Encyclopedia 2021, 1, In cancer patients, however, the impact of taste alteration or dysgeusia on the quality 240–248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ of life (QoL) is substantial, resulting in significant weight loss, malnutrition, depression, encyclopedia1010022 compromising adherence to cancer therapy, and, in severe cases, morbidity [5].
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2013/152252 Al 10 October 2013 (10.10.2013) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2013/152252 Al 10 October 2013 (10.10.2013) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: STEIN, David, M.; 1 Bioscience Park Drive, Farmingdale, Λ 61Κ 38/00 (2006.01) A61K 31/517 (2006.01) NY 11735 (US). MIGLARESE, Mark, R.; 1 Bioscience A61K 39/00 (2006.01) A61K 31/713 (2006.01) Park Drive, Farmingdale, NY 11735 (US). A61K 45/06 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) (74) Agents: STEWART, Alexander, A. et al; 1 Bioscience A61K 31/404 (2006 ) A61P 35/04 (2006.01) Park Drive, Farmingdale, NY 11735 (US). A61K 31/4985 (2006.01) A61K 31/53 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (21) International Application Number: available): AE, AG, AL, AM, PCT/US2013/035358 kind of national protection AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (22) International Filing Date: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, 5 April 2013 (05.04.2013) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, English (25) Filing Language: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (26) Publication Language: English ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, (30) Priority Data: RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, 61/621,054 6 April 2012 (06.04.2012) US TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, (71) Applicant: OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC [US/US]; ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Mucositis
    Division of Oral Medicine and Dentistry Oral Mucositis What is oral mucositis? Oral mucositis is a common side efect of many drugs used to Treatment with a class of chemotherapy (and treat cancer (chemotherapy). It is also common among patients immunosuppressive) agents called “mammalian target of receiving radiation therapy for cancers of the mouth, salivary rapamycin inhibitors”, or mTOR inhibitors (such as glands, sinuses and throat. Mucositis occurs when the cells and Rapamune and Afnitor), is also associated with development tissues of the mouth are injured by cancer treatment, which of oral ulcers. Unlike mucositis described above, this is cannot distinguish between ‘good’ normal cells or ‘bad’ cancer characterized by painful ulcers that look like canker sores. Tese cells. As a result the lining of the mouth breaks down and forms typically develop within the frst 1-2 weeks of mTOR inhibitor painful ulcers. Te severity of mouth ulcers may vary among therapy and tend to subside afer a few weeks even with patients with some patients being more able to tolerate them ongoing therapy. than others. Such ulcers can occur anywhere in the mouth, but Oral mucositis is not infectious in nature and you cannot spread are most common on the tongue, inside cheeks, lips and sof it to family or friends. palate (very back of the mouth). Although mucositis may be dramatic for a period of time while you are being treated, the How do we know it is oral mucositis? ulcers almost always heal by themselves within a few weeks of Mucositis is common. Your doctor can generally make a completing cancer treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sore Mouth Or Gut (Mucositis)
    Sore mouth or gut (mucositis) Mucositis affects the lining of your gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which includes your mouth and your gut. It’s a common side effect of some blood cancer treatments. It’s painful, but it can be treated and gets better with time. How we can help We’re a community dedicated to beating blood cancer by funding research and supporting those affected. We offer free and confidential support by phone or email, free information about blood cancer, and an online forum where you can talk to others affected by blood cancer. bloodcancer.org.uk forum.bloodcancer.org.uk 0808 2080 888 (Mon, Tue, Thu, Fri: 10am–4pm, Wed: 10am–1pm) [email protected] What is mucositis? The gastrointestinal or GI tract is a long tube that runs from your mouth to your anus – it includes your mouth, oesophagus (food pipe), stomach and bowels. When you have mucositis, the lining of your GI tract becomes thin, making it sore and causing ulcers. This can happen after chemotherapy or radiotherapy. There are two types of mucositis. It’s possible to get both at the same time: – Oral mucositis. This affects your mouth and tongue and can make talking, eating and swallowing difficult. It’s sometimes called stomatitis. – GI mucositis. This affects your digestive system and often causes diarrhoea (frequent, watery poos). 2 Mucositis may be less severe if it’s picked up early, so do tell your healthcare team if you have any of the symptoms described in this fact sheet (see pages 4–5). There are also treatments and self-care strategies which can reduce the risk of getting mucositis and help with the symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Combination of Two Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, Canertinib and PHA665752 Compromises Ovarian Cancer Cell Growth in 3D Cell Models
    Oncol Ther DOI 10.1007/s40487-016-0031-1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH A Combination of Two Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, Canertinib and PHA665752 Compromises Ovarian Cancer Cell Growth in 3D Cell Models Wafaa Hassan . Kenny Chitcholtan . Peter Sykes . Ashley Garrill Received: July 12, 2016 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com ABSTRACT EGFR/Her-2 inhibitor (canertinib) and a c-Met inhibitor (PHA665752) in ovarian cancer cell Introduction: Advanced ovarian cancer is often lines in 3D cell aggregates. a fatal disease as chemotherapeutic drugs have Methods: OVCAR-5 and SKOV-3 ovarian cancer limited effectiveness. Better targeted therapy is cell lines were cultured on a non-adherent needed to improve the survival and quality of surface to produce 3D cell clusters and life for these women. Receptor tyrosine kinases aggregates. Cells were exposed to canertinib including EGFR, Her-2 and c-Met are associated and PHA665752, both individually and in with a poor prognosis in ovarian cancer. combination, for 48 h. The effect on growth, Therefore, the co-activation of these receptors metabolism and the expression/ may be crucial for growth promoting activity. phosphorylation of selective signaling proteins In this study, we explored the effect of associated with EGFR, Her-2 and c-Met were combining two small molecule inhibitors that investigated. target the EGFR/Her-2 and c-Met receptor Results: The single drug treatments tyrosine kinases in two ovarian cancer cell significantly decreased cell growth and altered lines. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of signaling proteins in the combined inhibition activity of a dual OVCAR-5 and SKOV-3 cell lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Nausea and Vomiting and to Manage Breakthrough Symptoms
    6/16/2015 DISCLOSURES ● Leah Edenfield declares no conflicts of interest, real or apparent, CHEMOTHERAPY TOXICITY AND and no financial interests in any company, product, or service SUPPORTIVE CARE: mentioned in this program, including grants, employment, gifts, MANAGEMENT OF stock holdings, and honoraria. GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS Leah Edenfield, PharmD, BCPS PGY2 Oncology Pharmacy Resident June 12, 2015 OBJECTIVES Identify gastrointestinal effects frequently associated with chemotherapy Design a strategy to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and to manage breakthrough symptoms Recommend over-the-counter medications for diarrhea and NAUSEA AND VOMITING constipation as well as treatments for refractory symptoms Evaluate appetite stimulants for oncology patients Select appropriate therapy for management of mucositis PATHOPHYSIOLOGY CONTRIBUTING CAUSES Impulses to the vomiting center come from the chemoreceptor trigger zone, pharynx and GI tract, and cerebral cortex Bowel obstruction Impulses are then sent to the salivation center, abdominal muscles, Vestibular dysfunction respiratory center, and cranial nerves Hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, or hyponatremia Uremia Opiates or other concomitant mediations Gastroparesis Anxiety Serotonin and dopamine receptors are involved in the emetic response and are activated by chemotherapy Other relevant receptors include acetylcholine, corticosteroid, histamine, cannabinoid, opiate, and neurokinin-1 receptors in the vomiting and vestibular centers Antiemesis. NCCN Guidelines. Version 1.2015. Antiemesis. NCCN Guidelines. Version 1.2015. Image available at www.aloxi.net 1 6/16/2015 EMETIC RISK OF CHEMOTHERAPY ASCO GUIDELINES: EMETIC RISK Emetic risk categories .High (>90%) .Moderate (30-90%) .Low (10-30%) .Minimal (<10%) *Anthracycline + cyclophosphamide = high risk American Society of Clinical Oncology 2011. www.asco.org/guidelines/antiemetics. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Biomarkers for Immunotherapy
    Published OnlineFirst October 30, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2018-143 NEWS IN BRIEF also showed that it could be applicable Dacomitinib Approved, to CD22-targeted CAR T-cell therapy. “What’s really interesting is that but Might Not Be Used they uncovered a gene transfer–related The FDA approved the EGFR inhibi- mechanism of relapse, which I don’t tor dacomitinib (Vizimpro; Pfizer) as a think has been seen before,” says first-line therapy for patients with meta- Marcela Maus, MD, PhD, of Massachu- static, EGFR-mutant non–small cell setts General Hospital Cancer Center lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinicians, how- Structural formula for dacomitinib. in Boston. Inadvertent CAR19 trans- ever, doubt that the drug will be used duction aside, she notes, this single much in clinical practice, as it joins a treating brain metastases (J Clin Oncol B cell likely possessed additional char- crowded field of EGFR inhibitors that 2018 Aug 28 [Epub ahead of print]). acteristics that enabled it to survive includes osimertinib (Tagrisso; Astra- “I still think that osimertinib remains the therapy manufacturing process, Zeneca), the current standard of care. the standard for first-line [therapy] because engineered T cells are typically Instead, they are focused on the next based on toxicity, and based on its quick to eliminate any leukemic cells wave of therapeutic options. ability to elicit meaningful responses in in the patient-derived product. Dacomitinib was approved based on patients with brain metastasis,” he says. Ruella agrees that “some combina-
    [Show full text]