Oral Adverse Events Associated with Targeted Cancer Therapies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Oral adverse events associated with targeted cancer therapies Milda Chmieliauskaite, DMD, MPH ¢ Ivan Stojanov, DMD ¢ Mana Saraghi, DMD Andres Pinto, DMD, MPH, MSCE, MBA, FDSRCS (Edin) Over the past decade, targeted therapies have emerged ancer is the second-leading cause of death in the as promising forms of cancer treatment and are increas- United States. At some point in time, many dental ingly included in chemotherapeutic regimens for an patients will be undergoing cancer treatment. ever-growing list of human cancers. Targeted therapies C Conventional chemotherapeutic agents are cytotoxic to all repli- are so-named due to their specific targeting of dysregu- cating cells and do not target specific cancer cells; many adverse lated signaling pathways in cancer cells. This enhanced effects are attributable to this lack of discrimination. Many new discrimination between tumor and normal cells is a more cancer drugs are referred to as targeted therapy because they promising and efficacious approach to cancer treatment target dysregulated signaling pathways specific to a particular than conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, tar- type of cancer to inhibit cancer cell growth or survival. As geted therapies still have side effects, and some manifest these therapies do not simply target any and all replicating cells, in the oral cavity. Oral adverse events tend to be mild their effects promise to be more specific than conventional 1 and thus may be overlooked in the context of a patient’s chemotherapy. overarching diagnosis and management. These oral Despite an improvement in their overall side effect profile, lesions are often noted during an intraoral examination targeted therapies still manifest adverse effects, including oral and identified in the context of the patient’s medical his- and perioral lesions. This is not an entirely surprising observa- tory and medication list. It is imperative that the dentist tion, given that many signaling pathways dysregulated in human 1 be informed of the oral sequelae of targeted therapies. neoplasia also serve physiologic roles in normal cells. Many of these side effects can be successfully managed Targeted therapies come in various forms, such as monoclonal in a palliative manner with conservative therapy. This antibodies, small molecules, or protein kinase inhibitors, and 2 article discusses the clinical presentations and treatment most can target several pathways. More specifically, targeted of intraoral adverse events attributable to the following cancer therapies can be classified by the molecule or pathway classes of targeted therapies: epidermal growth factor targeted. These categories include, but are not limited to, epi- receptor inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin dermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors; inhibitors of inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors, and selected tyrosine the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR); platelet-derived kinase inhibitors. growth factor receptor (PDGFR) inhibitors; vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors; Received: November 3, 2017 multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors; human epidermal Revised: February 26, 2018 growth factor 2 (HER2) inhibitors; BRAF inhibitors; and CD20 Accepted: March 26, 2018 antigen inhibitors. Targeted cancer therapy is sometimes used as monotherapy but can also be combined with conventional 2,3 Key words: cancer, oral adverse events, targeted therapy chemotherapy or radiation. It is important for dentists to be familiar with the oral, head, and neck adverse events associated with targeted cancer therapy. This review presents the most common intraoral adverse events and discusses management strategies that have been reported in the literature. Targeted therapies and associated oral adverse events Published with permission of the Academy of General Dentistry. The oral adverse events associated with targeted cancer © Copyright 2018 by the Academy of General Dentistry. therapies may differ substantially from adverse events result- All rights reserved. For printed and electronic reprints of this article ing from conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies. Table 1 lists for distribution, please contact [email protected]. the oral adverse events associated with particular targeted chemotherapies. EGFR inhibitors EGFR inhibitors were among the first targeted therapies Exercise No. 426, p. 32 developed for the treatment of epithelial tumors, including Subject code: Special Patient Care (750) breast, colorectal, kidney, oral, oropharyngeal, and non–small 3-5 cell lung cancers. EGFR inhibitors target and antagonize the 26 GENERAL DENTISTRY September/October 2018 Table 1. Commonly reported oral adverse events in targeted therapy. Targeted therapy Common oral adverse events EGFR inhibitors Cetuximab, panitumumab, erlotinib, Mucositis, dysgeusia, xerostomia, geographic tongue, gefitinib, lapatinib, canertinib, vandetanib dysphagia, pharyngitis; cetuximab or panitumumab may potentiate radiation- or chemotherapy-induced mucositis mTOR inhibitors Sirolimus, temsirolimus, everolimus, Mucosal inflammation, mTOR inhibitor–associated ridaforolimus stomatitis (aphthouslike ulcers), dysgeusia, mouth pain, pharyngitis, dysphagia Hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor Vismodegib Dysgeusia BRAF inhibitors Dabrafenib, vemurafenib Hyperkeratotic lesions, increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma Angiogenesis inhibitors and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors Bevacizumab, axitinib, sunitinib, sorafenib, Mucosal sensitivity or pain, erythema, dysgeusia, pazopanib, cabozantinib, regorafenib, hypogeusia, ulceration, xerostomia, paresthesia, afatinib dimaleate, dacomitinib anesthesia, MRONJ, voice changes, hoarse voice, throat pain, tooth pain (sorafenib tosylate), lichenoid reactions; sunitinib may cause palatal mucosal pigmentation Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; MRONJ, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin. 8 ligand-binding domain of EGFR, blocking downstream signaling and other malignant processes. Since the HER family signaling and subsequent cell growth and division. pathways are normally involved in cell growth and differentia- The most common adverse events associated with EGFR tion, including those of epithelial cells, it is not surprising that inhibitors affect the skin, including the head and neck region; the most frequent adverse event reported for pan-HER tyrosine 7,8 the reaction frequently appears as a papulopustular eruption kinase inhibitors is mucositis. Afatinib has been approved 1,3 with distribution along the trunk and head/neck. Additional for the use of EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer, and dermatologic reactions that may occur include xerosis, alopecia, dacomitinib is in the clinical trial phase, yet both have been 3 7 paronychia, onycholysis, and photosensitivity. Adverse events reported to induce mucositis of varying grades. in the oral cavity are most commonly mucositis and less com- Mucositis associated with pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors monly dysgeusia, dysphagia, geographic tongue, pharyngitis, tends to present as erythema of the nonkeratinized mucosa with 3-5 7 and xerostomia. The oral mucositis generated by EGFR inhibi- superficial ulceration and may also involve the lips. Another 6 tors can range in presentation from erythema to ulceration. drug, lapatinib, a dual kinase inhibitor of EGFR and HER2, Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets EGFR, is can cause low-grade stomatitis as well as dysgeusia and taste 3 used in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, often in com- alterations. 1,7 bination with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Among EGFR inhibitors, cetuximab produces the greatest variety of mTOR inhibitors 3 oral adverse events. Furthermore, the addition of cetuximab mTOR inhibitors (such as sirolimus) have been widely used in or panitumumab to conventional chemotherapy or radiation the setting of graft-versus-host disease and solid organ trans- 9 therapy has been found to potentiate expected toxicities, such plantation and more recently are used in solid tumor oncology. 1,3,7 as mucositis. When cetuximab is used as stand-alone therapy, Temsirolimus, a kinase inhibitor, is indicated for use in renal cell mucositis is often mild, and thus dose modification or cessation carcinoma. Everolimus is indicated for advanced neuroendo- 7 of treatment is not recommended. crine tumors of the pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, or lung as well as HER2-negative breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and 10 Pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors several other less common tumors. Overexpression of the HER family signaling pathways plays Aphthouslike ulcers, often called mTOR inhibitor–associated a role in tumor progression, angiogenesis, metastatic spread, stomatitis (mIAS), are the most common oral adverse events agd.org/generaldentistry 27 Oral adverse events associated with targeted cancer therapies A B C Figure. Oral lesions associated with chemotherapy. A. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor–associated stomatitis (mIAS) associated with sirolimus. (Courtesy of Alessandro Villa, DDS, PhD, MPH, Boston, Massachusetts.) B & C. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy–associated mucositis. (Courtesy of Rui Amaral Mendes, DMD, PhD, Cleveland, Ohio.) 9,11 associated with mTOR inhibitors. The term mIAS is preferred or aflibercept in combination with 5-fluorouracil–based 15 to mucositis in the setting of mTOR inhibitors, as these lesions chemotherapy than in patients receiving chemotherapy