DOCSLIB.ORG

82 Domesticating the Gospel: a Review of Stanley J. Grenz's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
82 Domesticating the Gospel: a Review of Stanley J. Grenz's Domesticating the Gospel: A Review of Stanley J. Grenz’s Renewing the Center1 D. A. Carson D. A. Carson is Research Professor Responsible theological reflection must gelicalism, Grenz devotes the first two of New Testament at Trinity Evangelical embrace the best from the past while chapters to the material and formal prin- Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois. He addressing the present. If theologians ciples of evangelical thought. With respect is the author of numerous commentar- merely look to the past, then they risk to the material principle, he holds that ies and monographs, and is one of this becoming mere purveyors of antiquarian Luther’s commitment to justification by country’s foremost New Testament artifacts, however valuable those artifacts faith, modified by Calvin’s quest for sanc- scholars. Among his books are Divine may be. But if they are concerned only with tification, augmented by Puritan and Sovereignty and Human Responsibility the present, then it is not long before they Pietist concern for personal conversion, (John Knox Press, 1981; reprint, Baker, squander their heritage and become, as far sanctified living, and assurance of one’s 1994) and The Gagging of God: Chris- as the gospel is concerned, largely irrel- elect status, declined into comfortable tianity Confronts Pluralism (Zondervan, evant to the world they seek to reform conformity to outward forms until the 1996). because they domesticate the gospel to the awakenings in Britain and the American contemporary worldview, thereby robbing colonies charged them with new life. The it of its power. Stan Grenz, I fear, is drifting effect was a focus on “convertive piety” toward the latter error. (passim) and a concern for transformed living, rather than on adherence to creeds. Content Evangelical theology focused on personal As usual with Grenz’s writings, this salvation. book is free of malice and—provided one He discusses the formal principle in his is familiar with the jargon of postmodern second chapter. Contemporary conserva- discussion—reasonably lucid. Its ten chap- tive views of the Bible have not been ters can be divided into two parts. Grenz shaped exclusively by Luther or Calvin, he begins by citing a representative sample of writes, but also by Protestant scholastics voices that find contemporary evangelical who “transformed the doctrine of Scripture theology in disarray. In the first four chap- from an article of faith into the foundation ters and part of the fifth, Grenz treats for systematic theology” (17). At the end evangelicalism historically “as a theologi- of the nineteenth century the Princeton cal phenomenon,” trying to “draw from the theologians turned the doctrine of the particularly theological character of the inspiration of Scripture into “the primary movement’s historical trajectory” (15). fundamental” (17). This then was passed Accepting William J. Abraham’s analysis on to neo-evangelical theologians—those that the term “evangelical” embraces at thinkers who from the middle of the twen- least three constellations of thought, tieth century tried to lead evangelicalism namely the magisterial Reformation, the out of its introspection and exclusion into evangelical awakenings of the eighteenth engagement with the broader culture. century, and modern conservative evan- The next three chapters contain Grenz’s 82 analysis of contemporary evangelicalism Foundationalism,” summarizes the book by studying three pairs of men. The first Grenz jointly wrote with John R. Franke generation of neo-evangelical theologians entitled Beyond Foundationalism.2 Grenz can be represented by Carl F. H. Henry and gives us his take on “the rise and demise Bernard Ramm. Grenz believes that Henry of foundationalism in philosophy” (185) set a rationalistic and culturally critical cast before offering his own alternative. Here, to neo-evangelical theology and Ramm he says, he has been influenced especially tried to lead evangelical theology out of by Wolfhart Pannenberg and George “the self-assured rationalism he found in Lindbeck. Pannenberg’s appeal to the fundamentalism. Consequently, he became eschatological nature of truth, i.e. to the the standard-bearer for a more irenic and eschaton as the “time” when truth is culturally engaging evangelicalism” (18). established, responds to the reality that In the next generation, Millard Erickson “God remains an open question in the and Clark Pinnock supply the contrasts, contemporary world, and human knowl- Erickson as an establishment theologian edge is never complete or absolutely who systematized neo-evangelical theol- certain” (197). Lindbeck’s rejection of ogy and Pinnock as reflecting a theologi- “cognitive-propositionalist” and “experi- cal odyssey that wanted to fulfill the ential-expressive” approaches in favor of evangelical apologetic ideal by engaging a “cultural-linguistic” approach supports in dialogues with alternative views. Pannenberg’s emphasis on coherence. In Pinnock thereby carries on the irenic tra- Wittgenstein’s shadow, Lindbeck insists dition of Ramm. The fifth chapter proposes that doctrines are “the rules of discourse that the third-generation polarities can be of the believing community. Doctrines act aligned with Wayne Grudem and John as norms that instruct adherents how to Sanders. think about and live in the world” (198). Is this polarity so great that David Wells Like grammatical rules, they exercise a is correct in thinking that we are on the certain regulative function in the believing verge of evangelicalism’s demise? Or does community but they “are not intended to Dave Tomlinson’s announcement of a post- say anything true about a reality external evangelical era point the way ahead? Grenz to the language they regulate. Hence, each opts for neither stance. He suggests, in the rule [or doctrine] is only ‘true’ in the second half of chapter five, that the emerg- context of the body of rules that govern the ing task of evangelical theology is to come language to which the rules belong” (198). to grips with postmodernity. Recognizing Lindbeck calls for an “intratextual theol- this term’s ambiguities, he places the heart ogy” that aims at “imaginatively incorpo- of postmodernism in epistemology. Post- rating all being into a Christ-centered modernism adopts a chastened rationality world” (199).3 and marks a move away from realism to Within evangelicalism, Grenz finds the social construction of reality, from most hope in the work of Alvin Plantinga metanarrative to local stories. The rest of and Nicholas Wolterstorff, especially in the book teases out this proposal. their claim that Christian theology “is an The next three chapters constitute the activity of the community that gathers book’s heart. Chapter six, “Evangelical around Jesus the Christ” (201). This con- Theological Method after the Demise of stitutes a “communitarian turn” in evan- 83 gelical theology: “we have come to see the the modern era’s misunderstanding of story of God’s action in Christ as the para- Luther’s sola scriptura. Theologians in digm for our stories. We share an identity- the modern era, Grenz says, traded the constituting narrative” (202). This is not the “ongoing reading of the text” for their own same as old-fashioned liberalism, Grenz grasp of the doctrinal deposit that they asserts, because (1) liberalism was itself found in its pages that was “supposedly dependent on foundationalism, which encoded in its pages centuries ago” (206). Grenz rejects; and (2) older liberalism It is far wiser to incorporate speech-act tended to give primacy to experience such theory, and be sensitive to what the text that theological statements were mere does, how it functions, what it performs. “The expressions of religious experience, while Bible is the instrumentality of the Spirit in in the model that Lindbeck and Grenz are that the Spirit appropriates the biblical text propounding “experiences are always so as to speak to us today” (207). In this filtered by an interpretive framework that light, the reading of the text is “a commu- facilitates their occurrence. [R]eligions nity event.” Grenz agrees with Walter produce religious experience rather than Klaassen: “The text can be properly under- merely being the expressions of it” (202- stood only when disciples are gathered 203). together to discover what the Word has to Yet Grenz wants to go a step farther, a say to their needs and concerns” (208). step beyond Lindbeck: the task of theol- Thus even if the Bible is the “primary ogy, he argues, “is not purely descriptive… voice,” that voice must never be thought but prescriptive” (203). That is, it “ought to of as independent of the culturally-bound be the interpretive framework of the Chris- situation of the community of readers. tian community” (203). Taking a leaf out of Plantinga’s insistence that belief in God The ultimate authority in the church is the Spirit speaking through Scrip- may be properly “basic,” Grenz writes, ture. The Spirit’s speaking through “In this sense, the specifically Christian Scripture, however, is always a con- experience-facilitating interpretative textual speaking: it always comes to its hearers within a specific histori- framework, arising as it does out of the cal-cultural context. This has been biblical gospel narrative, is ‘basic’ for the case throughout church history, Christian theology” (203). This is not a for the Spirit’s ongoing provision of guidance has always come, and now return to foundationalism by another continues to come, to the commu- name, Grenz insists, because the “cogni- nity of Christ as a specific people in a specific setting hears the Spirit’s tive framework” that is “basic” for theol- voice speaking in the particularity of ogy does not precede theology; it is its historical-cultural context (209). “inseparably intertwined” with it (203- 204). The appropriate test becomes Here tradition may play a secondary role, coherence, not the disparate and often a kind of reference point, as the members unintegrated data of foundationalism—as of a community of faith recognize that exemplified, Grenz asserts, in a Grudem.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015-2016 2100 S
    sioux falls seminary Sioux Falls I Omaha I Online Catalog 2015-2016 2100 S. Summit Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD 57105 I 800.440.6227 I [email protected] I sfseminary.edu An accredited member of the Association of Theological Schools in the United States and Canada and the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools Table of Contents General Information Finances President’s Message.............................................1 Funding Your Education........................................27 Accreditation.........................................................2 Financial Aid........................................................27 Mission Statement..................................................2 Health Insurance..................................................28 Kingdom Calling............................................................2 Placement History..................................................................2 Placement of Graduates.......................................28 Statement of Beliefs.................................................3 Master’s Course Descriptions Locations............................................................3 Bible................................................................... 29 Campus Life Church History ....................................................... 30 Campus Facilities.................................................5 Counseling.........................................................31 Student Life Educational Ministries ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Ordination in the Baptist Context
    CHANGED, SET APART, AND EQUAL: A STUDY OF ORDINATION IN THE BAPTIST CONTEXT Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Jonathan Anthony Malone Dayton, Ohio May, 2011 CHANGED, SET APART, AND EQUAL: A STUDY OF ORDINATION IN THE BAPTIST CONTEXT APPROVED BY: _____________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Committee Chair _____________________________ Brad J. Kallenberg, Ph.D. Committee Member _____________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Member _____________________________ Anthony B. Smith, Ph.D. Committee Member _____________________________ William V. Trollinger, Ph.D. Committee Member ii ABSTRACT CHANGED, SET APART, AND EQUAL: A STUDY OF ORDINATION IN THE BAPTIST CONTEXT Name: Malone, Jonathan Anthony University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Dennis Doyle The American Baptist denomination is often characterized as an ecclesiological grass-roots organization. The theology of such a denomination is practiced organically by the people and is seldom articulated by the academy. Thus one cannot find a well articulated theological understanding of what ordination means for the individual and the community in the Baptist context. A synthesis of Geertz’s thick description, Lindbeck’s approach to doctrine, and McClendon’s understandings of speech-acts and conviction will offer a methodology through which one can articulate a theology of ordination. In doing so, we will find that the “call” and a relationship with a congregation are essential for ordination to occur. Such a theology will suggest that one is changed through ordination, and this change is relational in nature. The Catholic concept of Sacramental Consciousness offers a way to articulate the community’s awareness of the pastor’s relational change while at the same time maintaining the egalitarian nature of a Baptist community.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley Grenz's Relatedness and Relevancy to British
    Offprint from: SBET Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology VOLUME 28 NUMBER 1 SPRING 2010 EDITORIAL 1–2 Exile, Diaspora, and Old Testament Theology 3–17 DAVID REIMER Imputation in Pauline Theology: 18–30 Christ’s Righteousness or a Justified Status? GLEN SHELLRUDE Robert Moffat and Human Equity 31–42 BRUCE RITCHIE Sanctification by Justification: The Forgotten Insight 43–61 of Bavinck and Berkouwer on Progressive Sanctification DANE C. ORTLUND Stanley Grenz’s Relatedness and Relevancy 62–79 to British Evangelicalism JASON S. SEXTON Cultural Discipleship in a Time of God’s Patience 80–91 RICHARD J. MOUW STANLEY GRENZ STANLEY GRENZ ’S RELATEDNESS AND RELEVANCY TO a quality that marked part of the relationship of Stan Grenz and British evangelicalism. Accounting for this connection is the central aim of this BRITISH E VANGELICALISM paper, which will be structured in three parts. e rst explores specic trinitarian developments within the UK that Grenz found both helpful JASON S. SEXTON and instructive for his own development. Next, phenomena re!ective in UK developments that later began to emerge within North American evangelicalism’s recent history are explored, which also include Grenz’s personal involvement in (and reception of) the theological happenings INTRODUCTION across the pond. e third part highlights ways that British evangelical- Stanley Grenz did not have a close, direct relationship with British evan- ism beneted from and can still learn from Grenz’s work. While a plea for gelicalism. Aer university and seminary education in the US, he took continued British-American conversation is not the primary purpose of doctoral work in Munich (1976-78) before returning to North America this paper, key components of Grenz’s program uniquely lend themselves for a short pastorate (1979-81) that allowed him to teach adjunct theol- to those who desire to engage and articulate serious theology that serves ogy courses in Winnipeg.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted In
    dŚŝƐƚŚĞƐŝƐŚĂƐďĞĞŶƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚŝŶĨƵůĨŝůŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌĂƉŽƐƚŐƌĂĚƵĂƚĞĚĞŐƌĞĞ ;Ğ͘Ő͘WŚ͕DWŚŝů͕ůŝŶWƐLJĐŚŽůͿĂƚƚŚĞhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJŽĨĚŝŶďƵƌŐŚ͘WůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ ƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƵƐĞ͗ dŚŝƐǁŽƌŬŝƐƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĞĚďLJĐŽƉLJƌŝŐŚƚĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŝŶƚĞůůĞĐƚƵĂůƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJƌŝŐŚƚƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚĂƌĞ ƌĞƚĂŝŶĞĚďLJƚŚĞƚŚĞƐŝƐĂƵƚŚŽƌ͕ƵŶůĞƐƐŽƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞƐƚĂƚĞĚ͘ ĐŽƉLJĐĂŶďĞĚŽǁŶůŽĂĚĞĚĨŽƌƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůŶŽŶͲĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚŽƌƐƚƵĚLJ͕ǁŝƚŚŽƵƚ ƉƌŝŽƌƉĞƌŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŽƌĐŚĂƌŐĞ͘ dŚŝƐƚŚĞƐŝƐĐĂŶŶŽƚďĞƌĞƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚŽƌƋƵŽƚĞĚĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞůLJĨƌŽŵǁŝƚŚŽƵƚĨŝƌƐƚŽďƚĂŝŶŝŶŐ ƉĞƌŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŝŶǁƌŝƚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĂƵƚŚŽƌ͘ dŚĞĐŽŶƚĞŶƚŵƵƐƚŶŽƚďĞĐŚĂŶŐĞĚŝŶĂŶLJǁĂLJŽƌƐŽůĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůLJŝŶĂŶLJĨŽƌŵĂƚŽƌ ŵĞĚŝƵŵǁŝƚŚŽƵƚƚŚĞĨŽƌŵĂůƉĞƌŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĂƵƚŚŽƌ͘ tŚĞŶƌĞĨĞƌƌŝŶŐƚŽƚŚŝƐǁŽƌŬ͕ĨƵůůďŝďůŝŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĚĞƚĂŝůƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞĂƵƚŚŽƌ͕ƚŝƚůĞ͕ ĂǁĂƌĚŝŶŐŝŶƐƚŝƚƵƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĚĂƚĞŽĨƚŚĞƚŚĞƐŝƐŵƵƐƚďĞŐŝǀĞŶ͘ The Triune God and the Hermeneutics of Community: Church, Gender, and Mission in Stanley J. Grenz with reference to Paul Ricoeur Russell L. Almon Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh, School of Divinity 2017 Abstract The aim of this dissertation is to undertake a study of the trinitarian ecclesiology of the North American evangelical theologian Stanley J. Grenz (d.2005), along with his imago Dei theology, revisioned social trinitarianism, narrative theology, incorporation of theosis, and theology of triune participation. This dissertation also utilizes the hermeneutical philosophy of Paul Ricoeur, in conjunction with Grenz’s trinitarian ecclesiology, to propose a missional and hermeneutical ecclesiology. Chapter one begins with an overview of Grenz’s theology and a discussion of the current state of
    [Show full text]
  • Can Evangelical Theology Move Beyond Foundationalism? Some Insights from the Theological Method of Stanley J
    www.crucible.org.au 1:1 (May 2008) Can Evangelical Theology Move Beyond Foundationalism? Some Insights from the Theological Method of Stanley J. Grenz Brian Harris Baptist Theological College of Western Australia Abstract: Stanley Grenz has proposed a method for theological construction that moves beyond foundationalism and which is appropriate for a postmodern context. In this article the building blocks of Grenz’s method are explored before an examination of the application of his method in his text on homosexuality, Welcoming but Not Affirming, is undertaken. Though Grenz proposes that culture should serve as a source for theological construction, in this text he is only able to utilize cultural insights on a highly selective basis, which raises questions as to whether his method is genuinely postfoundational. The article argues that this highlights the difficulty evangelicals find when they attempt to embrace a postfoundational method. In their 2001 publication, Stanley Grenz and John Franke proclaim their intention of devising a theological method that moves Beyond Foundationalism, with the hope that such a method will, as the subtitle of their text proclaims, assist in Shaping Theology in a Postmodern Context.1 They are especially concerned that their method will be acceptable to the evangelical community, noting, with slight exaggeration, that while theologians in mainline theological circles have been in need of a reminder that theology involves more than simply reflecting on method… Evangelical theologians have produced numerous works concerned with the content and exposition of theology. Yet they have given little attention to methodological concerns.2 In his work on theological method Grenz has succeeded in devising a model that has occasioned much comment amongst evangelicals.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Stanley J. Grenz Office Address: Home Address: Carey Theological
    Stanley J. Grenz 22 February 2005 office address: home address: Carey Theological College 8026 Birch Bay Drive #255 5920 Iona Drive Blaine WA 98230 Vancouver BC V6T 1J6 Canada telephone: 604-224-4308 website address: fax: 604-224-5014 www.stanleyjgrenz.com PERSONAL Born: January 7, 1950, Alpena, MI Married to Edna (Sturhahn) Grenz B.Mus.Ed., University of Colorado M.Mus., University of South Dakota Doctor of Worship Studies (cand.), Institute for Worship Studies Minister of Worship, First Baptist Church, Vancouver, BC Father of two married children and one grandchild Joel Grenz (born August 20, 1978) Corina (Grenz) Kuban (born December 28, 1979) Anika Grace Kuban (born October 7, 2004) ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE 2003- Pioneer McDonald Professor of Theology Carey Theological College Vancouver BC 2004- Professor of Theological Studies Mars Hill Graduate School Seattle WA 2003-2004 Scholar in Residence Mars Hill Graduate School Seattle WA 2002-2003 Visiting Distinguished Professor of Theology ACTS Seminaries (Associated Canadian Theological Schools) Trinity Western University Langley BC 1 2002-2003 Distinguished Professor of Theology Baylor University and Truett Seminary Waco TX 1990-2002 Pioneer McDonald Professor of Baptist Heritage, Theology and Ethics Carey Theological College and Regent College Vancouver BC 1996-1999 Professor of Theology and Ethics (Affiliate) Northern Baptist Theological Seminary Lombard IL 1981-1990 Professor of Systematic Theology and Christian Ethics North American Baptist Seminary Sioux Falls SD 1980-1981 Adjunct Professor
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Doctrine of the Trinity in the Theology of Stanley J
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository THE ROLE OF THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY IN THE THEOLOGY OF STANLEY J. GRENZ Jason S. Sexton A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2012 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3025 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence University of St. Andrews St. Mary’s College The Role of the Doctrine of the Trinity in the Theology of Stanley J. Grenz A thesis submitted by Jason S. Sexton To the Faculty of Divinity In candidacy for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy St. Andrews, Scotland March 2012 Thesis Declaration I, Jason Scott Sexton, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September, 2008 and as a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology in May, 2009; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2008 and 2011. Date ____________ Signature of candidate _________________________ I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Complementarianism and Eschatology: Engaging Gordon Fee's
    Complementarianism and Eschatology: Engaging Gordon Fee’s “New Creation” Egalitarianism Everett Berry Associate Professor of Theology Criswell College Dallas, Texas Introduction practical terms. This indeed is a complex question, The New Testament teaches that the redemp- especially when it pertains to gender issues. tive work of Jesus Christ marks a pivotal transition Our interests about such topics as male head- in history because it finally addresses humanity’s ship, spousal roles, and Christian service are all deepest problems. Christ’s sacrifice atones for sin intertwined not merely because they pertain to how and propitiates God’s wrath against sinners. His God’s people should co-exist relationally but, at a resurrection defeats the curse of death. His victory deeper level, they reflect our views of what it means thwarts the schemes of the devil and accomplishes to be a part of the new creation in Christ. This is his Father’s mission so that the kingdom of heaven why complementarian and egalitarian polemics are might eventually become a full reality on the earth. often engaged in terms of how male and female Taken together then, these realities indicate that roles should be defined in light of the results of sal- Old Testament promise has moved to new cov- vation. Egalitarians, for example, contend that all enant fulfillment in inaugurated form. Now the present categories of identity such as economic sta- present age simply commences on a divinely-set tus, ethnic background, and gender have now been stopwatch ticking down the last days until the age “Christified” under the new covenant so that they to come arrives in its complete form, a day which no longer have any relevance for defining the func- is otherwise known as the Day of the Lord when tional roles of believing men or women.1 It is not the glorified Christ returns to save his people and that such categories no longer exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth for a Postmodern Era
    Truth for a Postmodern Era by Steve W. Lemke New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary In a famous courtroom scene in the Rob Reiner directed movie A Few Good Men, Lieutenant Kaffee (played by Tom Cruise) cross examines Colonel Jessup (played by Jack Nicholson) about an unsanctioned disciplinary incident on the Marine base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. In this intense scene, Kaffee demands loudly, “I want to know the truth!” Jessup angrily growls, “You can’t handle the truth!” Jessup’s retort may have some similarities with the response that evangelical Christians may need to provide to postmodernists. The issue is not that truth cannot be found, but that postmodernists do not want to accept the truth that they encounter. What is truth in this postmodern era? Many have proposed that we design a new epistemology that is better suited to the inclinations of this postmodern era. However, it is rather strange to suggest that the moving of a clock hand somehow changes truth. Truth is truth in part because it is trustworthy and true across time; it does not change constantly like fashion and personal taste. This article will propose eleven theses about truth that apply not only in this postmodern era, but in all times and all places. To be more specific and technical, the epistemology here advocated is an objective foundationalist epistemology. 1. Truth is unified and orderly, not disconnected and chaotic. Christians believe that both reality and truth are unified because their origin is the orderly 1 creation of God (Genesis 1-2, John 1). Not only did creation bring order out of chaos, but in Jesus Christ the world continues to fit together in an orderly schema (Acts 17:28, Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability G E N E R a L E D I T O R Robert B
    Disability G E N E R A L E D I T O R Robert B. Kruschwitz A rt E di TOR Heidi J. Hornik R E V ie W E D I T O R Norman Wirzba PROCLAMATION EDITOR William D. Shiell A S S I S tant E ditor Heather Hughes PRODUCTION ASSISTANT Elizabeth Sands Wise D E S igner Eric Yarbrough P UB li SH E R The Center for Christian Ethics Baylor University One Bear Place #97361 Waco, TX 76798-7361 P H one (254) 710-3774 T oll -F ree ( US A ) (866) 298-2325 We B S ite www.ChristianEthics.ws E - M ail [email protected] All Scripture is used by permission, all rights reserved, and unless otherwise indicated is from New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright 1989, Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. ISSN 1535-8585 Christian Reflection is the ideal resource for discipleship training in the church. Multiple copies are obtainable for group study at $3.00 per copy. Worship aids and lesson materials that enrich personal or group study are available free on the Web site. Christian Reflection is published quarterly by The Center for Christian Ethics at Baylor University. Contributors express their considered opinions in a responsible manner. The views expressed are not official views of The Center for Christian Ethics or of Baylor University. The Center expresses its thanks to individuals, churches, and organizations, including the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship, who provided financial support for this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Roger E. Olson Present Position and Address
    CURRICULUM VITAE ROGER E. OLSON PRESENT POSITION AND ADDRESS Professor of Theology, George W. Truett Theological Seminary, Baylor University (1999- present); P.O. Box 97126, Waco, TX 76798. BIOGRAPHY AND PERSONAL INFORMATION Born in Des Moines, Iowa February 2, 1952. Raised in Pastor's home. Graduated from High School in Sioux Falls, South Dakota in 1970. Married Becky Jeanne Sandahl in 1973. Two children: Sonja Kristen and Amanda Joy. Interested in geography and current events, amateur photography, bowling, gardening and gospel music. EDUCATION B.A. in Biblical and Theological Studies, Open Bible College, Des Moines, Iowa, 1974 (magna cum laude) M.A. in Religious Studies, North American Baptist Seminary, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 1978 (magna cum laude) M.A. in Religious Studies, Rice University, Houston, Texas, 1982 ("With Honor") Ph.D. in Religious Studies, Rice University, Houston, Texas, 1984 Courses in German language and culture: University of Houston, Houston, Texas, 1980; Goethe Institute, Munich, West Germany, 1981; University of Munich, 1981 Graduate courses in Theology: SHALOM (Center for Continuing Theological Studies), Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 1975 and 1976; Bethel Theological Seminary, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1985 Research and studies at the Institut für Ökumene und Fundamentaltheologie of the Evangelische Fakultät of the University of Munich (Prof. Dr. Wolfhart Pannenberg, Chairman), Munich, West Germany, 1981-1982 SCHOLARSHIPS, FELLOWSHIPS, AND GRANTS Full Tuition Scholarships and Teaching Assistantships, Rice University, Houston, Texas, 1978-1981 University Fellowship for Overseas Study, Rice University, Houston, Texas, 1981-1982 Faculty Development Grant for research on nineteenth and twentieth century theology, 1988 Alumni Grant for research and development of companion volume of readings for book 1 Roger E.
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND SOCIAL TRINITARIANISM Stanley J. Grenz's Baptist
    1 BEYOND SOCIAL TRINITARIANISM Stanley J. Grenz’s Baptist, Trinitarian Innovation Jason S. Sexton • Jason S. Sexton is a theologian in residence at Ridley Hall, Cambridge • Stanley J. Grenz was commonly understood as one of North America’s leading evangelical theologians of recent years, committed to developing a social doctrine of the Trinity with major significance for his theology and ethics. His own caution regarding social trinitarianism was often overlooked, however, as was his movement beyond the fashionable social models of the Trinity to his own trinitarian proposal, which can best be understood as flowing from his evangelical and baptist self-identity. tanley Grenz (1950-2005), the North American theologian, studied for his doctorate under Wolfhart Pannenberg in Germany. SFollowing his doctoral studies he briefly served as a pastor until in 1981 he became Professor of Systematic Theology and Christian Ethics at the North American Baptist Seminary, Sioux Falls, USA, and from 1990 Professor of Baptist Heritage, Theology and Ethics at Carey Theological College and Regent College in Vancouver, Canada. Grenz has often been identified as one of the turn-of-the-century’s leading social trinitarians. The designation has seemed fitting, categorizing Grenz with others identified with the recent trinitarian resurgence, with chief representatives being Colin Gunton and Miroslav Volf.1 But 2 BAPTIST QUARTERLY linking Grenz with this renaissance does not tell the whole story of Grenz’s trinitarian innovation or agenda. It is not really an accurate description of his reception of social trinitarian innovations and is, indeed, incomplete at best; at worst, it is a highly dubious and misleading representation.
    [Show full text]