DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction of the Aggregates Levy in Northern Ireland: One Year On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction of the Aggregates Levy in Northern Ireland: One Year On House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Introduction of the Aggregates Levy in Northern Ireland: one year on Third Report of Session 2003–04 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 10 March 2004 HC 395 [Incorporating HC 1101-i & ii, Session 2002-03] Published on 12 March 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £14.50 The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Northern Ireland Office (but excluding individual cases and advice given by the Crown Solicitor); and other matters within the responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (but excluding the expenditure, administration and policy of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Northern Ireland and the drafting of legislation by the Office of the Legislative Counsel). Current membership Mr Michael Mates, MP (Conservative, East Hampshire) (Chairman) Mr Adrian Bailey, MP (Labour / Co-operative, West Bromwich West) Mr Harry Barnes, MP (Labour, North East Derbyshire) Mr Roy Beggs, MP (Ulster Unionist Party, East Antrim) Mr Tony Clarke, MP (Labour, Northampton South) Mr Iain Luke, MP (Labour, Dundee East ) Mr Eddie McGrady, MP (Socialist Democratic Labour Party, South Down) Mr Stephen Pound, MP (Labour, Ealing North) Mr Peter Robinson, MP (Democratic Unionist Party, East Belfast) Rev Martin Smyth, MP (Ulster Unionist Party, Belfast South) Mr Hugo Swire, MP (Conservative, East Devon) Mr Mark Tami, MP (Labour, Alyn & Deeside) Mr Bill Tynan, MP (Labour, Hamilton South) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/northern_ireland_affairs.cfm. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Elizabeth Hunt (Clerk), Hugh Farren (Attached Clerk), Aileen O’Neill (Committee Specialist), Tony Catinella (Committee Assistant), Camilla Brace (Secretary). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2172/3; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] 1 Contents Report Page 1 Introduction 3 2 History of the Committee's involvement with the aggregates levy 3 3 The need for a follow-up inquiry 3 4 Government proposal to amend the levy relief scheme 4 5 European State Aid approval 4 6 Conclusions 5 Formal minutes 6 Witnesses 7 List of written evidence 8 Reports from the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee since 2002 9 3 1 Introduction 1. The aggregates levy was announced by the Government in Budget 2000, and came into effect from 1 April 2002. The levy was designed as a ‘green tax’ to promote recycling of waste aggregates and to mitigate the environmental costs of aggregate consumption. The levy is charged at a universal rate of £1.60 per tonne of aggregate extracted in the UK, whether the aggregate consists of sand, gravel or crushed rock. The levy is also charged on imported virgin aggregates, but not charged on imported processed aggregates such as ready mixed concrete. 2 History of the Committee's involvement with the aggregates levy 2. Our current inquiry follows our work in the 2001–02 session of Parliament. We began our initial inquiry into this subject in October 2001 after concerns were raised about: x The effectiveness of the levy as an environmental instrument; x The impact of the levy on the balance of competition between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland where no levy exists; and x The cost of the levy to public sector construction. 3. Our investigation revealed that the research on which the levy was built had failed to take account of the distorting effect on the operation of the levy caused by the land border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. In our Report, we recommended that the Government postpone any introduction of the levy into Northern Ireland, until a fully-informed decision has been reached as to its effects.1 4. As a result of representations from this Committee and from the aggregates industry in Northern Ireland, the Government agreed to phase in the introduction in Northern Ireland of the levy over 5 years2. The concession would apply only to processed products such as asphalt in order to allow the aggregates and construction industries in Northern Ireland time to adjust to the impact of the levy.3 3 The need for a follow-up inquiry 5. It became apparent to us that the levy was not bringing about the environmental improvements sought by the Government and that enforcing the levy was proving difficult. Concerns were also raised that the levy was encouraging the illegal use of untaxed 1 Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, First Report of Session 2001–02, Introduction of the Aggregates Levy in Northern Ireland, HC 333 2 HM Treasury, Pre-Budget Report, November 2002, Cm 5664, page 144, paragraph 7.73 3 The phased-in introduction of the levy will result in the amount of levy relief reducing by 20 per cent each year, starting with 20 per cent of the levy on 1 April 2002 (32p a tonne) with the full levy payable on 1 April 2007 (£1.60 per tonne) 4 aggregate and had led to a significant increase in unauthorised quarry sites in Northern Ireland. 6. We took evidence on three occasions in the period from September 2003 to February 2004. We would like to thank all those who gave evidence in this inquiry. We are grateful for the time and effort afforded us in understanding the complexities of the aggregates industry and the impact the levy has had on it. 4 Government proposal to amend the levy relief scheme 7. We took oral evidence from the Economic Secretary to the Treasury on 5 November 2003. In his opening statement, the Economic Secretary acknowledged that the levy was unlikely to meet its environmental aims and would not reduce the environmental impact of quarrying in Northern Ireland. As a result he said the Treasury was now prepared to look at alternatives to, or further reform of, the present scheme of levy relief.4 8. In the Pre-Budget statement on 10 December 2003, the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced details of a proposed new scheme designed to address the concerns raised by this Committee. 9. The new proposal for Northern Ireland would continue to cover aggregates used in processed products and the relief would be extended to cover virgin aggregate. The Government hoped the new scheme would come into effect on 1 April 2004, freezing the current rate of levy relief at 80 per cent until 31 March 2012. In return quarry operators would need to sign up to environmental improvements that would be regularly monitored and reviewed. Enforcement activity would also be stepped up.5 5 European State Aid approval 10. In order for the new scheme to be implemented, State Aid approval is required from the European Commission. After receipt of the UK Government’s State Aid application, the Commission have three months in which to consider the application. If further information is sought by the Commission then the 3 month time period is extended. Other interested parties (including other Member States) may submit comments; this procedure can delay the application by 12 months or more. 11. The Government’s State Aid application was submitted to the European Commission on 5 January 2004.6 12. In evidence to us on 25 February 2004, the Economic Secretary to the Treasury was unsure whether or not the introduction date of 1 April 2004 could be met but stressed that every effort was being made to assist the Commission in meeting this target. 4 Q 86 5 HM Treasury, Pre-Budget Report, December 2003, Cm 6042, page 163, paragraph 7.67 6 Ev 58 5 13. We are concerned about the effect any delay in introducing the new scheme might cause. If the new scheme is not in place by 1 April 2004 then under the present levy relief scheme the relief is set to reduce by a further 20 per cent on this date to 60 per cent. Subsequent introduction of the new scheme later in the year may necessitate the refunding of this additional 20 per cent—assuming that the new scheme can be applied retrospectively—back to 1 April 2004. 14. Under either scenario many businesses in Northern Ireland would be subjected unnecessarily to increased costs in the coming months. The Treasury told us that planning for late introduction of the new scheme, and development of a procedure for returning overpayments to those businesses, was not currently its priority.7 15. It was also apparent that, should the new scheme be rejected by the Commission, the Treasury was unsure of the future of the aggregates levy in its current form either in relation to Northern Ireland or the UK as a whole. 6 Conclusions 16. We are grateful to the Minister for listening to our concerns about the problems associated with the aggregates levy in Northern Ireland because of its land border with the Republic of Ireland.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Country and Regional Public Sector Finances: Methodology Guide
    Country and regional public sector finances: methodology guide A guide to the methodologies used to produce the experimental country and regional public sector finances statistics. Contact: Release date: Next release: Oliver Mann 21 May 2021 To be announced [email protected]. uk +44 (0)1633 456599 Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. Experimental Statistics 3. Public sector and public sector finances statistics 4. Devolution 5. Country and regional public sector finances apportionment methods 6. Income Tax 7. National Insurance Contributions 8. Corporation Tax (onshore) 9. Corporation Tax (offshore) and Petroleum Revenue Tax 10. Value Added Tax 11. Capital Gains Tax 12. Fuel Duties 13. Stamp Tax on shares 14. Tobacco Duties 15. Beer Duties 16. Cider Duties 17. Wine Duties Page 1 of 41 18. Spirits Duty 19. Vehicle Excise Duty 20. Air Passenger Duty 21. Insurance Premium Tax 22. Climate Change Levy 23. Environmental levies 24. Betting and gaming duties 25. Landfill Tax, Scottish Landfill Tax and Landfill Disposals Tax 26. Aggregates Levy 27. Bank Levy 28. Stamp Duty Land Tax, Land and Buildings Transaction Tax, and Land Transaction Tax 29. Inheritance Tax 30. Council Tax and Northern Ireland District Domestic Rates 31. Non-domestic Rates and Northern Ireland Regional Domestic Rates 32. Gross operating surplus 33. Interest and dividends 34. Rent and other current transfers 35. Other taxes 36. Expenditure methodology 37. Annex A : Main terms Page 2 of 41 1 . Introduction Statistics on public finances, such as public sector revenue, expenditure and debt, are used by the government, media and wider user community to monitor progress against fiscal targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax and Devolution
    Published on The Institute for Government (https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk) Home > Tax and devolution Tax and devolution Who collects taxes in the UK? The majority of taxes in the UK are set by central government in Westminster, with revenue collected by HMRC and the Treasury determining how this should be distributed across government. But there are some exceptions. The UK parliament has legislated over recent years to devolve some tax powers away from Westminster. This means Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland – and local authorities in England – have varying levels of power over some taxes. Why have some taxes been devolved? When devolved administrations were established in 1999, there was a significant imbalance between their spending and tax raising powers. This meant that they were not responsible for raising any of the money they spent, relying instead on funding from the UK government. Tax devolution in Scotland and Wales is seen as a way of improving the financial accountability of devolved administrations, and encouraging them to choose policies that stimulate growth in their tax base. During the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, UK party leaders also committed to create a more empowered Scottish parliament by devolving substantial revenue-raising powers, as part of ‘The Vow’[1] agreed in the final days of the campaign. In Northern Ireland, the tax devolution debate has been driven by different considerations, including to enable the Northern Ireland executive to mitigate the effect of lower business tax rates in the Republic of Ireland. In England, the government has a longstanding commitment to the decentralisation of business rates revenue, which is intended to strengthen the incentives for local government to support the growth of business in their areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Levy/Import/Export Opportunities and Implications for a Net Zero Isle of Man
    Work Package N IMPACT Report Appendix 36 (b)(iii) Review of levy/import/export opportunities and implications for a net zero Isle of Man 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1. This paper reviews the options of utilising the Island’s indirect taxation system to introduce new levies; import or export arrangements etc. that could assist the Island in achieving net zero carbon. 1.2. The paper highlights the opportunities and implications of introducing the environmental taxes that are currently in place in the UK and which are specifically managed through HMRC’s indirect taxation system. These are: Climate Change Levy, Carbon Price Floor, Aggregates Levy and Landfill Tax. 1.3. However, it should be noted that the existence of the 1979 Customs and Excise Agreement prevents the Isle of Man Government from deviating from UK duty rates for any of the duties defined as ‘common duties’ under the Agreement; this includes all hydrocarbon duties and customs (import) duties. 1.4. The paper concludes that whilst there are definitely some opportunities available, the Isle of Man Government will need to exercise caution to ensure that the longstanding revenue sharing arrangements that the Island has in place with the UK, would not be put at risk/contravened as this could result in the Agreement being withdrawn. However, the introduction of an Isle of Man based carbon tax could be considered. 2. INDIRECT TAX IN THE ISLE OF MAN Scope 2.1. This paper explores the opportunities etc. to introduce new levies and import / export arrangements that could help the Isle of Man achieve net zero carbon by 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Tax System and the Environment
    The UK Tax System and the Environment Andrew Leicester Copy-edited by Judith Payne The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street London WC1E 7AE Published by The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street London WC1E 7AE tel. +44 (0) 20 7291 4800 fax +44 (0) 20 7323 4780 email: [email protected] http://www.ifs.org.uk © The Institute for Fiscal Studies, October 2006 ISBN-10: 1-903274-47-8 ISBN-13: 978-1-903274-47-7 Printed by Patersons, Tunbridge Wells Preface The research in this report was produced with generous funding and support from the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation. The author is extremely grateful to Mike Brewer of IFS, Darren Greedy at HM Treasury, Ronan Palmer at the Environment Agency, Danyal Sattar of the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and Stephen Smith of University College London for invaluable comments, advice and discussion. Any errors remain his own. Contents Executive summary i 1. Introduction 1 2. The rationale for environmental taxation 3 2.1 Pros and cons of using environmental taxes 4 2.2 What should be taxed? 6 3. Environmental tax revenues 9 3.1 Trends in total revenues 9 3.2 Who pays environmental taxes in the UK? 12 3.3 How does the UK compare internationally? 13 4. A history of emissions and emissions targeting in the UK 15 4.1 Trends in UK emissions 15 4.2 The UK in international perspective 19 5. Green taxes and other instruments currently in use in the UK 21 5.1 Taxes on transport 23 5.2 Taxes on waste and natural resources 47 5.3 Taxes on energy 58 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance Bill
    This corrected copy of Volume I of the Bill is being published due to incorrect numbering of paragraphs in Schedules 7, 8 and 9. It is being issued free of charge to all known recipients of the original publication. Finance Bill EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer has made the following statement under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998: In my view the provisions of the Finance Bill are compatible with the Convention rights. Bill 125-I 53/1 iv Finance Bill General 21 Drawback of excise duty PART 2 VALUE ADDED TAX 22 Disallowance of input tax where consideration not paid 23 Flat-rate scheme 24 Invoices 25 Relief from VAT on acquisition if importation would attract relief PART 3 INCOME TAX, CORPORATION TAX AND CAPITAL GAINS TAX CHAPTER 1 CHARGE AND RATE BANDS Income tax 26 Charge and rates for 2002-03 27 Indexed rate bands for 2002-03: PAYE deductions etc 28 Personal allowance for 2003-04 for those aged under 65 29 Personal allowances for 2003-04 for those aged 65 or over Corporation tax 30 Charge and main rate for financial year 2003 31 Small companies’ rate and fraction for financial year 2002 32 Corporation tax starting rate and fraction for financial year 2002 CHAPTER 2 OTHER PROVISIONS Employment income and related matters 33 Employer-subsidised public transport bus services 34 Car fuel: calculation of cash equivalent of benefit 35 Statutory paternity pay and statutory adoption pay 36 Exemption of minor benefits: application to non-cash vouchers 37 Minor amendments to Schedule E charge 38 Provision
    [Show full text]
  • General Information About Compliance Checks Into Certain Large and Complex Businesses
    Compliance checks series – CC/FS1c General information about compliance checks into certain large and complex businesses This factsheet gives you general information about compliance checks into businesses that have been allocated a HMRC Customer Compliance Manager (CCM) because of their size or the complexity of their tax affairs. This factsheet contains important information. Please take the time to read it and keep it safe – you may need to refer to it during our check. This factsheet is one of a series. For the full list of the factsheets in the series, go to www.gov.uk and search for ‘Compliance checks factsheets’. How we work with these large and complex businesses The tax affairs of the largest and most complex businesses are looked after by the Large Business part of HMRC. Each is allocated a CCM who manages HMRC’s compliance activities and the relationship between the business and HMRC across all taxes and duties. Our CCMs work with these large business customers to identify, check and manage tax risk. Our approach aims to build a transparent and trusting relationship with these businesses. We want to ensure quicker resolution of issues and proportionate use of resources in addressing tax risks, to keep compliance costs down. To do this, we’ll: • be open and transparent in our interactions with you • expect that you’ll interact openly and transparently with us • work with you to explore tax risks that we, or you, identify • discuss those risks with you in the first instance, before considering the use of formal powers We may however need to use our formal powers or issue an assessment notice under certain circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Taxes Outlook
    Budget Responsibility Welsh taxes outlook December 2019 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction........................................................................................... 1 Fiscal devolution in Wales.................................................................. 1 The OBR’s role in forecasting Welsh tax revenue ................................. 2 Our approach to fiscal forecasting ..................................................... 6 Policy costings ................................................................................... 8 Dealing with uncertainty .................................................................. 13 Evaluating our forecasts .................................................................. 15 Forecast timetable ........................................................................... 17 Structure of the document ................................................................ 18 Chapter 2 Welsh rates of income tax .................................................................... 19 What are the ‘Welsh rates of income tax’? ........................................ 19 Methodology .................................................................................. 21 Latest forecast ................................................................................. 30 Key uncertainties ............................................................................. 32 Chapter 3 Land transaction tax ............................................................................ 35 Introduction ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Tax 2020: United Kingdom
    Corporate Tax 2020: United Kingdom December 2019 1. Tax Treaties and Residence 1.1 How many income tax treaties are currently in force in your jurisdiction? The United Kingdom has one of the most extensive treaty networks in the world, with over 140 comprehensive income tax treaties currently in force. One of the consequences of an exit from the European Union (assuming the UK loses the benefit of the Parent-Subsidiary and Interest and Royalties Directives and repeals the UK legislation implementing them) will be greater reliance on the UK’s treaty network to provide exemption from withholding taxes. In some cases there will still be tax leakage, such as on dividends received in the UK from Germany and Italy and royalties paid from the UK to Luxembourg (see question 3.2 below). 1.2 Do they generally follow the OECD Model Convention or another model? They generally follow the OECD model, with some inevitable variation from one treaty to the next. As part of the OECD’s BEPS project (see question 10.1 below), changes were made to the definition of “permanent establishment” (“PE”) in Article 5 of the Model Convention. However, the UK will not apply to its existing treaties the changes extending the definition to “commissionaire” (and similar) arrangements. This is because of the risk that this extension could lead to a proliferation of PEs where there is little or no profit to attribute to any of them. 1.3 Do treaties have to be incorporated into domestic law before they take effect? Yes. A tax treaty must be incorporated into UK law and this is done by way of a statutory instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • A Closer Look
    GLOBAL TAX WEEKLY ISSUE 125 | APRIL 2, 2015 a closer look SUBJECTS TRANSFER PRICING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY VAT, GST AND SALES TAX CORPORATE TAXATION INDIVIDUAL TAXATION REAL ESTATE AND PROPERTY TAXES INTERNATIONAL FISCAL GOVERNANCE BUDGETS COMPLIANCE OFFSHORE SECTORS MANUFACTURING RETAIL/WHOLESALE INSURANCE BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS RESTAURANTS/FOOD SERVICE CONSTRUCTION AEROSPACE ENERGY AUTOMOTIVE MINING AND MINERALS ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA OIL AND GAS COUNTRIES AND REGIONS EUROPE AUSTRIA BELGIUM BULGARIA CYPRUS CZECH REPUBLIC DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND FRANCE GERMANY GREECE HUNGARY IRELAND ITALY LATVIA LITHUANIA LUXEMBOURG MALTA NETHERLANDS POLAND PORTUGAL ROMANIA SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND UNITED KINGDOM EMERGING MARKETS ARGENTINA BRAZIL CHILE CHINA INDIA ISRAEL MEXICO RUSSIA SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH KOREA TAIWAN VIETNAM CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN BOSNIA CROATIA FAROE ISLANDS GEORGIA KAZAKHSTAN MONTENEGRO NORWAY SERBIA TURKEY UKRAINE UZBEKISTAN ASIA-PAC AUSTRALIA BANGLADESH BRUNEI HONG KONG INDONESIA JAPAN MALAYSIA NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN PHILIPPINES SINGAPORE THAILAND AMERICAS BOLIVIA CANADA COLOMBIA COSTA RICA ECUADOR EL SALVADOR GUATEMALA PANAMA PERU PUERTO RICO URUGUAY UNITED STATES VENEZUELA MIDDLE EAST ALGERIA BAHRAIN BOTSWANA DUBAI EGYPT ETHIOPIA EQUATORIAL GUINEA IRAQ KUWAIT MOROCCO NIGERIA OMAN QATAR SAUDI ARABIA TUNISIA LOW-TAX JURISDICTIONS ANDORRA ARUBA BAHAMAS BARBADOS BELIZE BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS COOK ISLANDS CURACAO GIBRALTAR GUERNSEY ISLE OF MAN JERSEY LABUAN LIECHTENSTEIN MAURITIUS MONACO TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS VANUATU GLOBAL TAX WEEKLY a closer look Global Tax Weekly – A Closer Look Combining expert industry thought leadership and team of editors outputting 100 tax news stories a the unrivalled worldwide multi-lingual research week. GTW highlights 20 of these stories each week capabilities of leading law and tax publisher Wolters under a series of useful headings, including industry Kluwer, CCH publishes Global Tax Weekly –– A Closer sectors (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition Point for All Tax and Duty Heads
    RECOGNITION POINT FOR ALL TAX AND DUTY HEADS TAX OR DUTY BRIEF DETAILS RECOGNITION POINT HEAD Income Tax The two main components of personal income tax are PAYE (including PAYE paid by higher rate employees) and self assessed income tax (self employed and balance of higher rate employees). Student loan recoveries are also collected via PAYE. PAYE income tax (and income tax relating to higher paid employees Income tax collected at source is paid over otherwise covered by the self by employers to the Inland Revenue by the assessment system) collected, and 19th of the month following the month of amounts due to or from employers, collection from the employee for non for the tax year just ended will be electronic payments and 22nd of the month available in the October following the following the month of collection for end of the tax year – in time for the approved electronic payment methods. financial year with which the fiscal Final, annual returns are due to HMRC by year is (almost) coterminous. PAYE 19th May (22nd May for electronic income tax is accounted for on an payments), after which time employers will accruals basis. issue P60s to employees. HMRC carries out a reconciliation exercise in October and Self-assessed income tax (for those identifies any amounts due to or from the who pay by instalments) will be employer in respect of PAYE income tax for deemed to accrue evenly over the tax the year. year in which the relevant accounting period ends. The accrual will be based on the two payments on Details of the self assessed income tax for account (received in the January in the higher rate employee, and therefore the the tax year and the July following it), amount due to or from the taxpayer, will not with a statistical estimation of the be available until approximately one year balancing payment, net of after the tax year to which the tax return repayments, due in the January of the relates.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Tax Measures
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Environmental tax measures Fifty-Fifth Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 22 April 2021 HC 937 Published on 28 April 2021 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Gareth Bacon MP (Conservative, Orpington) Kemi Badenoch MP (Conservative, Saffron Walden) Shaun Bailey MP (Conservative, West Bromwich West) Olivia Blake MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hallam) Dan Carden MP (Labour, Liverpool, Walton) Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP (Conservative, The Cotswolds) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Peter Grant MP (Scottish National Party, Glenrothes) Mr Richard Holden MP (Conservative, North West Durham) Sir Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) Craig Mackinlay MP (Conservative, Thanet) Sarah Olney MP (Liberal Democrat, Richmond Park) Nick Smith MP (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) James Wild MP (Conservative, North West Norfolk) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Or Duty Number of Reliefs Aggregates Levy 27 Air Passenger
    Office of Tax Simplification List of Tax Reliefs November 2010 Tax or duty Number of reliefs Aggregates Levy 27 Air Passenger Duty 10 Bank Payroll Tax 2 Capital Gains Tax 44 Capital Gains Tax & Corporation Tax 33 Climate Change Levy 14 Corporation Tax 104 Customs Duty 10 Excise Taxes 7 Gambling Duty 12 Hydrocarbon Oils Duty 13 Income Tax 225 Income Tax & Capital Gains Tax 6 Income Tax & Capital Gains Tax & Inheritance Tax 1 Income Tax & Corporation Tax 89 Income Tax & Corporation Tax & Capital Gains Tax 4 Income Tax & Corporation Tax & Capital Gains Tax & Stamp Duty Land Tax 2 Income Tax & National Insurance Contributions 73 Inheritance Tax 89 Insurance Premium Tax 11 Landfill Tax 9 National Insurance Contributions 73 Petroleum Revenue Tax 12 Stamp Duty 45 Stamp Duty Land Tax 43 Stamp Duty Reserve Tax 17 Stamp Duty Reserve Tax & Stamp Duty 12 Value Added Tax 55 Grand Total 1042 Office of Tax Simplification - List of Tax Reliefs Ref Tax or Duty Relief Title Description Statutory Reference 1 Aggregates Aggregate exported from the Tax credit may be available against FA 2001 s30(1)(a) Levy UK aggregates levy if that aggregate is exported from the UK. 2 Aggregates Aggregate that again If a quantity of aggregate again FA 2001 s19(3)(e) Levy becomes part of the land becomes part of the land it is exempt from aggregates levy. 3 Aggregates Aggregates disposed of Tax credit against an aggregates levy SI 2002/761 Reg 13(2)(d)(i) Levy without further processing may be available where the aggregate is disposed of unprocessed to the originating site.
    [Show full text]