DOCSLIB.ORG

A Closer Look

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Closer Look GLOBAL TAX WEEKLY ISSUE 125 | APRIL 2, 2015 a closer look SUBJECTS TRANSFER PRICING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY VAT, GST AND SALES TAX CORPORATE TAXATION INDIVIDUAL TAXATION REAL ESTATE AND PROPERTY TAXES INTERNATIONAL FISCAL GOVERNANCE BUDGETS COMPLIANCE OFFSHORE SECTORS MANUFACTURING RETAIL/WHOLESALE INSURANCE BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS RESTAURANTS/FOOD SERVICE CONSTRUCTION AEROSPACE ENERGY AUTOMOTIVE MINING AND MINERALS ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA OIL AND GAS COUNTRIES AND REGIONS EUROPE AUSTRIA BELGIUM BULGARIA CYPRUS CZECH REPUBLIC DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND FRANCE GERMANY GREECE HUNGARY IRELAND ITALY LATVIA LITHUANIA LUXEMBOURG MALTA NETHERLANDS POLAND PORTUGAL ROMANIA SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND UNITED KINGDOM EMERGING MARKETS ARGENTINA BRAZIL CHILE CHINA INDIA ISRAEL MEXICO RUSSIA SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH KOREA TAIWAN VIETNAM CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN BOSNIA CROATIA FAROE ISLANDS GEORGIA KAZAKHSTAN MONTENEGRO NORWAY SERBIA TURKEY UKRAINE UZBEKISTAN ASIA-PAC AUSTRALIA BANGLADESH BRUNEI HONG KONG INDONESIA JAPAN MALAYSIA NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN PHILIPPINES SINGAPORE THAILAND AMERICAS BOLIVIA CANADA COLOMBIA COSTA RICA ECUADOR EL SALVADOR GUATEMALA PANAMA PERU PUERTO RICO URUGUAY UNITED STATES VENEZUELA MIDDLE EAST ALGERIA BAHRAIN BOTSWANA DUBAI EGYPT ETHIOPIA EQUATORIAL GUINEA IRAQ KUWAIT MOROCCO NIGERIA OMAN QATAR SAUDI ARABIA TUNISIA LOW-TAX JURISDICTIONS ANDORRA ARUBA BAHAMAS BARBADOS BELIZE BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS COOK ISLANDS CURACAO GIBRALTAR GUERNSEY ISLE OF MAN JERSEY LABUAN LIECHTENSTEIN MAURITIUS MONACO TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS VANUATU GLOBAL TAX WEEKLY a closer look Global Tax Weekly – A Closer Look Combining expert industry thought leadership and team of editors outputting 100 tax news stories a the unrivalled worldwide multi-lingual research week. GTW highlights 20 of these stories each week capabilities of leading law and tax publisher Wolters under a series of useful headings, including industry Kluwer, CCH publishes Global Tax Weekly –– A Closer sectors (e.g. manufacturing), subjects (e.g. transfer Look (GTW) as an indispensable up-to-the minute pricing) and regions (e.g. asia-pacifi c). guide to today's shifting tax landscape for all tax practitioners and international fi nance executives. Alongside the news analyses are a wealth of feature articles each week covering key current topics in Unique contributions from the Big4 and other leading depth, written by a team of senior international tax fi rms provide unparalleled insight into the issues that and legal experts and supplemented by commentative matter, from today’s thought leaders. topical news analyses. Supporting features include a round-up of tax treaty developments, a report on Topicality, thoroughness and relevance are our important new judgments, a calendar of upcoming tax watchwords: CCH's network of expert local researchers conferences, and “The Jester's Column,” a lighthearted covers 130 countries and provides input to a US/UK but merciless commentary on the week's tax events. ©2015 CCH Incorporated and/or its affi liates. All rights reserved. GLOBAL TAX WEEKLY ISSUE 125 | APRIL 2, 2015 a closer look CONTENTS FEATURED ARTICLES Don't Get Snowed In By GATCA Country-By-Country Reporting Is Here Peter Staff ord, DMS Off shore Investment Services 5 Kurt Wulfekuhler, Peters Advisors 22 Capital Gains And Small Business Incorporation Avoiding Pitfalls In Mutual Agreement Procedures Pete Miller, Th e Miller Partnership, Dr. Alexander Voegele and Philip de Homont, Taxation Specialists 11 NERA Economic Consulting 24 Topical News Briefi ng: Indian Government Topical News Briefi ng: CCCTB Back From Announces New GST Push Th e Grave Th e Global Tax Weekly Editorial Team 16 Th e Global Tax Weekly Editorial Team 28 STEP Roundtable Commentary A UK Budget Too Good To Be True? Hawksford 18 Jason Gorringe, Global Tax Weekly 30 NEWS ROUND-UP VAT, GST, Sales Tax 37 European Union 40 India To Table Legislation For GST In April EU MEPs Discuss New Corporate Tax Reform Plans Luxembourg To Tax E-books At Headline VAT Rate Bulgaria Seeks EU Intervention On New Greek Tax EU VAT Ruling Pilot To Run Until 2018 Greece To Face ECJ On Inheritance Tax Rules UK Conservatives Dismiss VAT Hike Claim EC Approves UK Aggregates Levy Exemptions International Trade 43 International Financial Centers 52 China Approves Th ree More Free Trade Zones Changes To Russia's Off shore Law May Benefi t CIs WTO Members Seeking Trade Facilitation Deal By Turks And Caicos Tax Changes Eff ective April 1 December Compliance Corner 55 Tax Reform 45 US Bill To Ban Federal Employment Of Tax Debtors Australia Engages Public On Tax Regime Overhaul South Africa Issues Small Business Tax Guide US House To Vote On Repeal Of Estate Tax Italy Extends Tax Reform Implementation Period TAX TREATY ROUND-UP 57 HMRC Told To Get A Handle On Tax Expenditures CONFERENCE CALENDAR 59 IN THE COURTS 71 Country Focus: Canada 50 THE JESTER'S COLUMN 76 Alberta, Québec Publish 2015 Budgets Th e unacceptable face of tax journalism Canada Begins 2015 With Budget Surplus For article guidelines and submissions, contact [email protected] © 2015 CCH Incorporated and its affi liates. All rights reserved. FEATURED ARTICLES ISSUE 125 | APRIL 2, 2015 Don't Get Snowed In By GATCA by Peter Staff ord, DMS Off shore Investment Services Peter Staff ord, a Cayman Islands attorney-at-law, is a Director and Global Co-Lead of the International Tax Compliance Group of DMS Off shore Investment Services. Contact: pstaff ord@dmsoff shore.com , Tel. + 1 345 749 2489 Th is article discusses the preparatory and precau- tionary steps that reporting fi nancial institutions Introduction should take not only to comply with GATCA, but Off shore investment entities in the Cayman Is- also to safeguard against potential regulatory inves- lands and many other international fi nancial cen- tigation or enforcement action arising from the tax ters should now start turning their attention to status of their account holders. compliance with the Common Reporting Stan- dard ("CRS") promulgated by GATCA – Global Th e US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act FATCA. Th ey must document all account holders ("FATCA") is now gaining considerable momen- existing on December 31, 2015, with the exception tum since FATCA came fully into eff ect on Janu- of entities with an account balance or value not ex- ary 1, 2015. US withholding agents and non-US ceeding USD250,000. Th ere is no de minimis ex- investment entities, depositories, custodial institu- ception for individual account holders. tions and other Participating Foreign Financial In- stitutions ("PFFIs") and Reporting Financial Insti- By late 2017, tax authorities in over 50 jurisdic- tutions ("RFIs") are scrambling to prepare for the tions – in addition to the US and UK – will be en- fi rst automatic exchange of information ("AEOI"). titled to information on accounts and certain indi- Th is will intensify next year when the scope of re- rect interests held by any residents in those off shore portable accounts and information becomes much investment entities. Th at number nearly doubles broader. AEOI will become an avalanche in 2017 one year later. Th e CRS sets the scene for unprec- when reporting and exchange of information under edented international collaboration on compliance the OECD's GATCA takes eff ect. Th is will repre- and enforcement of domestic income tax law. Off - sent an unprecedented change in tax authorities' shore investment entities should consider making ability to tackle off shore tax evasion. Th e change new GATCA disclosures and other arrangements in volume of cross border tax information requests with that end in mind. will then probably curve up like a hockey stick. 5 What will the fi nancial services industry look like income made to Non-Participating Financial In- then? It is inevitable that some account holders, fi - stitutions ("NPFIs") and to "recalcitrant" account nancial institutions and jurisdictions will feel frost holders that do not cooperate with the due dili- bitten and others could fi nd themselves buried gence requirements. As of March 1, 2015, the IRS deep in an icy drift with little breathing room. How had issued 156,276 Global Intermediary Identifi - many and where will they be? Are there practical le- cation Numbers ("GIINs") to FFIs registered on gal precautions that FFIs and their account holders the FATCA FFI Registration System. Registration should take now to avoid being "snowed in"? is required to establish an FFI's commitment to comply with its obligations under the FFI Agree- FATCA's "Carrot And Stick" ment and FATCA or its jurisdiction's Model 1 IGA FATCA is designed to stop American tax evasion and domestic IGA-enabling regulations. Th e GIIN on their foreign accounts by requiring Foreign Fi- protects FFIs from being treated as an NPFI and nancial Institutions ("FFIs") to report on those ac- being subject to FATCA withholding tax, report- counts either directly to the IRS or indirectly via ing, and/or account closure. their domestic tax authority. FATCA was intro- duced in the United States as Chapter 4 of the In- GATCA: Same Carrot, Diff erent Stick ternal Revenue Code and US Treasury Regulations. GATCA and FATCA off er the same "carrot," re- Th e US Treasury's "carrot-and-stick" approach has ciprocal exchange of information. Th is is appealing proven quite eff ective in gaining other countries' because most countries impose individual income and FFIs' cooperation on FATCA. tax and corporate tax on the worldwide income of their residents and companies. Th e global averag- Th e "carrot" is the US promise of reciprocal ex- es are 31.4 percent and 23.6 percent, respectively. change of information with those countries with Th ese numbers are quite consistent across Africa, which it enters into a Reciprocal Model 1 Intergov- the Americas, Asia, Europe, and Oceania. 1 Before ernmental Agreement ("IGA") with the US. Th ere addressing GATCA's stick, it is worth considering are now 118 jurisdictions in various stages of ne- how GATCA is constituted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Study and Comparison of the Consumption Basis of Taxation
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1964 A Study and Comparison of the Consumption Basis of Taxation Douglas Wayne Blevins College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Finance Commons Recommended Citation Blevins, Douglas Wayne, "A Study and Comparison of the Consumption Basis of Taxation" (1964). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624554. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-n8af-t738 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A STUDY AND COMPARISON OF THE CONSUMPTION BASIS OF TAXATION 1 FOREWORD This treatise is a study and comparison ©f the three measures of economic well-being and their use as bases far financing govern­ ment. Particular emphasis is given to the study ©f the consumption basis ef taxation. Submitted in compliance with the requirements for the Master ef Arts degree in Taxation. Douglas W. Blevins 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Part I. Introduction. A. Sources of Revenue. B. Principles ef taxation. 1. Canons ef Adam Smith. 2* Characteristics ef tax systems. % Economic effects. 4. E quity. 5. Compliance. 6. Shifting and incidence. Part II. Measures ef Economic Well-Being. A. Current income as a measure. 1. Income. 2. Definition ef income. a. The economic definition. b. The tax definition.
    [Show full text]
  • To View a PDF of This Article, Please Click Here
    GLOBAL TAX WEEKLY ISSUE 134 | JUNE 4, 2015 a closer look SUBJECTS TRANSFER PRICING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY VAT, GST AND SALES TAX CORPORATE TAXATION INDIVIDUAL TAXATION REAL ESTATE AND PROPERTY TAXES INTERNATIONAL FISCAL GOVERNANCE BUDGETS COMPLIANCE OFFSHORE SECTORS MANUFACTURING RETAIL/WHOLESALE INSURANCE BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS RESTAURANTS/FOOD SERVICE CONSTRUCTION AEROSPACE ENERGY AUTOMOTIVE MINING AND MINERALS ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA OIL AND GAS COUNTRIES AND REGIONS EUROPE AUSTRIA BELGIUM BULGARIA CYPRUS CZECH REPUBLIC DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND FRANCE GERMANY GREECE HUNGARY IRELAND ITALY LATVIA LITHUANIA LUXEMBOURG MALTA NETHERLANDS POLAND PORTUGAL ROMANIA SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND UNITED KINGDOM EMERGING MARKETS ARGENTINA BRAZIL CHILE CHINA INDIA ISRAEL MEXICO RUSSIA SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH KOREA TAIWAN VIETNAM CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN BOSNIA CROATIA FAROE ISLANDS GEORGIA KAZAKHSTAN MONTENEGRO NORWAY SERBIA TURKEY UKRAINE UZBEKISTAN ASIA-PAC AUSTRALIA BANGLADESH BRUNEI HONG KONG INDONESIA JAPAN MALAYSIA NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN PHILIPPINES SINGAPORE THAILAND AMERICAS BOLIVIA CANADA COLOMBIA COSTA RICA ECUADOR EL SALVADOR GUATEMALA PANAMA PERU PUERTO RICO URUGUAY UNITED STATES VENEZUELA MIDDLE EAST ALGERIA BAHRAIN BOTSWANA DUBAI EGYPT ETHIOPIA EQUATORIAL GUINEA IRAQ KUWAIT MOROCCO NIGERIA OMAN QATAR SAUDI ARABIA TUNISIA LOW-TAX JURISDICTIONS ANDORRA ARUBA BAHAMAS BARBADOS BELIZE BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS COOK ISLANDS CURACAO GIBRALTAR GUERNSEY ISLE OF MAN JERSEY LABUAN LIECHTENSTEIN MAURITIUS MONACO TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS VANUATU GLOBAL TAX WEEKLY a closer look Global Tax Weekly – A Closer Look Combining expert industry thought leadership and team of editors outputting 100 tax news stories a the unrivalled worldwide multi-lingual research week. GTW highlights 20 of these stories each week capabilities of leading law and tax publisher Wolters under a series of useful headings, including industry Kluwer, CCH publishes Global Tax Weekly –– A Closer sectors (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Lexis® PSL Tax Analysis
    Lexis ® PSL Analysis Tax Lexis ® PSL Tax Analysis Autumn Statement 2016 – views from the market Tax analysis: Views from leading tax practitioners on Autumn Statement 2016. The Lexis®PSL Tax Consulting Editorial Board (CEB) and other leading tax practitioners provide us with their views on the Autumn Statement delivered by the Chancellor on 23 November 2016. For the Lexis®PSL Tax summary and analysis of the key business tax announcements in Autumn Statement 2016, see: Autumn Statement 2016—Lexis®PSL Tax analysis. Overall views of the Autumn Statement 2016 on the following topics: AUTUMN STATEMENT 2016 IN OVERVIEW BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE NON-RESIDENT COMPANIES SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDING EXEMPTION EMPLOYMENT TAXES INSURANCE PRIVATE EQUITY AND FUNDS STAMP TAXES REAL ESTATE VAT AND INDIRECT TAXES OIL AND GAS TAX AVOIDANCE AND EVASION TAX ADMINISTRATION AND COMPLIANCE LexisPSL Tax Analysis | Get a free trial of LexisPSL Tax at lexisnexis.co.uk/AS2016/viewsfromthemarket Tax - views Tax from the market Lexis ® PSL AUTUMN STATEMENT 2016 IN OVERVIEW Gerald Montagu, NGM Tax Law and CEB member—Business, theatrical performance is a thing of the past, and we must now the Chancellor recognises, dislikes uncertainty and in his first get used to a more understated air. Or to put it another way, the (and, we were told, the last) Autumn Statement, some elements speech was not very interesting: Tigger replaced by Eeyore. of the approach he intends to take in pursuit of greater certainty The Chancellor confirmed that we will be getting a BEPS-inspired became just a little bit clearer. restriction on the deductibility of corporate debt costs to 30% A measure of caution seems to be an important element of of adjusted EBITDA, and reform of the corporate loss relief rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Tax Law Changes Luxury Tax on Liquor
    Historical Tax Law Changes Luxury Tax on Liquor Laws 1933, 1st Special Session, Chapter 18 levied the first Arizona state Luxury Tax on Liquor. The tax rates established by this law are shown below: 10¢ on each 16 ounces, or fractional part thereof, for malt extracts 10¢ on each container of spirituous liquor containing 16 ounces or less 10¢ on each 16 ounces of spirituous liquor in containers of more than 16 ounces 3¢ on each container of vinous liquor containing 16 ounces or less 3¢ on each 16 ounces of vinous liquor in containers of more than 16 ounces 5¢ on each gallon of malt liquor The tax was paid by the purchase of stamps affixed to each container of liquor and malt extract and canceled prior to sale. Taxes were payable to the State Tax Commission, prior to or at the time of the sale of the product. Of the total receipts collected, 96% was dedicated to the Board of Public Welfare and the remaining 4% was appropriated for the use of the State Tax Commission. The tax was a temporary tax and expired on March 1, 1935. (Effective June 28, 1933) Laws 1935, Chapter 14 extended the provisions of Laws 1933, 1st Special Session, Chapter 18 to May 1, 1935. (Effective February 20, 1935) Laws 1935, Chapter 78 permanently enacted the provisions of Laws 1933, 1st Special Session, Chapter 18, with respect to the Luxury tax on Liquor. The tax rates levied on containers of spirituous liquor and vinous liquor were replaced with the rates shown below: 5¢ on each container of spirituous liquor containing 8 ounces or less 5¢ on each 8 ounces of spirituous
    [Show full text]
  • ACEA Tax Guide 2018.Pdf
    2018 WWW.ACEA.BE Foreword The 2018 edition of the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association’s annual Tax Guide provides an overview of specific taxes that are levied on motor vehicles in European countries, as well as in other key markets around the world. This comprehensive guide counts more than 300 pages, making it an indispensable tool for anyone interested in the European automotive industry and relevant policies. The 2018 Tax Guide contains all the latest information about taxes on vehicle acquisition (VAT, sales tax, registration tax), taxes on vehicle ownership (annual circulation tax, road tax) and taxes on motoring (fuel tax). Besides the 28 member states of the European Union, as well as the EFTA countries (Iceland, Norway and Switzerland), this Tax Guide also covers countries such as Brazil, China, India, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Turkey and the United States. The Tax Guide is compiled with the help of the national associations of motor vehicle manufacturers in all these countries. I would like to extend our sincere gratitude to all involved for making the latest information available for this publication. Erik Jonnaert ACEA Secretary General Copyright Reproduction of the content of this document is not permitted without the prior written consent of ACEA. Whenever reproduction is permitted, ACEA shall be referred to as source of the information. Summary EU member countries 5 EFTA 245 Other countries 254 EU member states EU summary tables 5 Austria 10 Belgium 19 Bulgaria 42 Croatia 48 Cyprus 52 Czech Republic 55 Denmark 65 Estonia 79 Finland 82 France 88 Germany 100 Greece 108 Hungary 119 Ireland 125 Italy 137 Latvia 148 Lithuania 154 Luxembourg 158 Malta 168 Netherlands 171 Poland 179 Portugal 184 Romania 194 Slovakia 198 Slovenia 211 Spain 215 Sweden 224 United Kingdom 234 01 EU summary tables Chapter prepared by Francesca Piazza [email protected] ACEA European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association Avenue des Nerviens 85 B — 1040 Brussels T.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO, WHAT, HOW and WHY Fact Sheet
    Ta x , Super+You. Take Control. Years 7-12 Tax 101 Activity 2 WHO, WHAT, HOW AND WHY Fact sheet How do we work out what is a fair amount of tax to pay? • Is it fair that everyone, regardless of Different types of taxes affect their income and expenses, should taxpayers in different ways. pay the same amount of tax? • Is it fair if those who earn the most pay the most tax? • What is a fair amount of tax TYPES OF TAXES AND CHARGES for people who use community resources? Taxes can only be collected if a law has been passed to permit their collection. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act established a federal system of government when it created TAX STRUCTURES the nation of Australia in 1901. It distributes law-making powers between the national government and the states and territories. There are three tax structures used in Australia: Each level of government imposes different types of taxes and Proportional taxes: the same percentage is levied, charges. During World War II the Australian Government took regardless of the level of income. Company tax is a over all responsibilities for income tax and it has remained the proportional tax as the same rate applies for all companies, major source of federal tax revenue ever since. regardless of the profit earned. Progressive taxes: the higher the income, the higher the Levels of government and their taxes percentage of tax paid. Income tax for individuals is a Federal progressive tax. State or territory Local (Australian/Commonwealth) Regressive taxes: the same dollar amount of tax is paid, regardless of the level of income.
    [Show full text]
  • Excise Duties in Finland in a Historical Perspective
    Excise Duties in Finland in a Historical Perspective Leila Juanto 1 Excise Duties as Consumption Taxes In Finland, “excise duties” denote a certain, distinct group of consumption taxes. However, the term is not defined unambiguously in the literature, and problems abound when one begins looking for equivalents in the history of taxation in Finland or in the tax systems of other countries. As used today, the term nevertheless refers quite consistently to taxes that are levied on the basis of particular legislation and, in principle, explicitly called excise taxes in that legislation. In this perspective - the formal concept of excise duties - the excise duties in Finland comprise the excise duty on manufactured tobacco, the excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages, the excise duty on electricity and certain energy sources, and the excise duty on soft drinks. One thing serving to clarify the concept of excise duty in the European Union, of which Finland is a member, is that excise duties fall into the category known as harmonized taxes. Clearly, EC Directives profoundly influence the content of the excise duties levied on certain products. As excise duties are part of the system of consumption taxation, it is appropriate to discuss their distinctive features and the ways in which they differ from the other taxes in that category. Here, the salient concept to consider is that of a material excise duty; in other words, taxes that share distinctive features can be classified as belonging to the same group. Consumption taxes are taxes levied on the consumption of goods and services; the taxes can be subdivided into general and selective consumption taxes according to how extensive the group of commodities is to which the tax applies.1 In terms of this classification, excise duties are selective taxes, the tax 1 Here, there is no reason to consider the occasional question whether the taxes on commodities used in entrepreneurial activity fall into the category of consumption taxes or whether such taxes are merely taxes on consumption by private households.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawing the Line Between Takings and Taxation: the Continuous Burdens Principle, and Its Broader Application
    Drawing the Line Between Takings and Taxation: The Continuous Burdens Principle, and Its Broader Application Eric Kades† Professor, William & Mary Law School (757) 221-3828 [email protected] CONTENTS I. Introduction ..................................................1 II. Existing Commentary on Distinguishing Taxes and Takings .........3 A. A Simple Solution: Taxation’s General Liabilities Versus Taking’s Specific Assets ............................................4 B. More Nuanced Classical Views ..............................9 C. The Policy Goals of Takings Favor the Classical View ..........17 III. The Primary Battle Ground to Date: Legality of Progressive Taxation ...........................................................19 A. History & Positive Legal Doctrine ...........................20 B. Normative Considerations of Progressive Income Taxation ........................................................25 IV. The Continuous Burdens Principle (CBP) ........................34 A. The Continuous Burdens Principle ..........................35 B. The Continuous Marginal Burdens Principle & Current Takings Doctrine ................................................56 C. Normative Foundations for the CBP .........................59 V. Fees, Special Assessments, & Specific Taxes ......................65 VI. Packaging & Logrolling .......................................69 VII. Conclusion .................................................74 †Thanks to Lynda Butler, Bob Ellickson, Jim Krier, Glynn Lunney, Tom Merrill, Ron Rosenberg, Cynthia Ward, and
    [Show full text]
  • The Things of Caesar: Mark-Ing the Plural (Mk 12:13–17)
    Page 1 of 9 Original Research The Things of Caesar: Mark-ing the Plural (Mk 12:13–17) Author: This article observes the rarely-discussed phenomenon that the Marcan paying-the-tax scene 1,2 Warren Carter refers to tax in the singular, whilst the concluding saying uses the plural ‘the things of Caesar Affiliations: and of God’. The article accounts for this phenomenon by means of developing traditions. 1Brite Divinity School, The section under the heading ‘Mark’s scene and saying about taxes (12:13–17)’ counters Texas Christian University, the common claim that scene and saying originated as a unit from the historical Jesus. It United States of America proposes that whilst the saying may have originated with Jesus, the scene as we have it did 2Department of New not. The section under the heading ‘Social memory, orality, and a multi-referential saying?’ Testament Studies, Faculty suggests some contexts that the saying about the things of Caesar addressed pre-Mark. And of Theology, University of under the section ‘Trauma and Mark’s scene’ it is argued that Mark created a unit comprising Pretoria, South Africa scene and saying to negotiate the ‘trauma’ of the 66–70 war. The unit evaluates freshly- Note: asserted Roman power as idolatrous and blasphemous whilst simultaneously authorising Prof. Dr Warren Carter is the continued involvement of Jesus-believers in imperial society. participating as a research associate in the project ‘Biblical Theology and Hermeneutics’, directed Introduction by Prof. Dr Andries G. Van Aarde, honorary professor Despite extensive discussion of the Synoptic paying-the-tax scene (Mk 12:13–17), little attention in the Faculty of Theology, has been paid to the incongruity between linguistic items in the singular – tax (κῆσον,1 Mk 12:14), University of Pretoria, denarius (δηνάριον) (Mk 12:15) – and Jesus’ final saying that employs the plural, ‘the things’ τά( ) South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • To View a PDF of This Article, Please Click Here
    GLOBAL TAX WEEKLY ISSUE 223 | February 16, 2017 a closer look SUBJECTS TRANSFER PRICING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY VAT, GST AND SALES TAX CORPORATE TAXATION INDIVIDUAL TAXATION REAL ESTATE AND PROPERTY TAXES INTERNATIONAL FISCAL GOVERNANCE BUDGETS COMPLIANCE OFFSHORE SECTORS MANUFACTURING RETAIL/WHOLESALE INSURANCE BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS RESTAURANTS/FOOD SERVICE CONSTRUCTION AEROSPACE ENERGY AUTOMOTIVE MINING AND MINERALS ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA OIL AND GAS COUNTRIES AND REGIONS EUROPE AUSTRIA BELGIUM BULGARIA CYPRUS CZECH REPUBLIC DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND FRANCE GERMANY GREECE HUNGARY IRELAND ITALY LATVIA LITHUANIA LUXEMBOURG MALTA NETHERLANDS POLAND PORTUGAL ROMANIA SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND UNITED KINGDOM EMERGING MARKETS ARGENTINA BRAZIL CHILE CHINA INDIA ISRAEL MEXICO RUSSIA SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH KOREA TAIWAN VIETNAM CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN BOSNIA CROATIA FAROE ISLANDS GEORGIA KAZAKHSTAN MONTENEGRO NORWAY SERBIA TURKEY UKRAINE UZBEKISTAN ASIA-PAC AUSTRALIA BANGLADESH BRUNEI HONG KONG INDONESIA JAPAN MALAYSIA NEW ZEALAND PAKISTAN PHILIPPINES SINGAPORE THAILAND AMERICAS BOLIVIA CANADA COLOMBIA COSTA RICA ECUADOR EL SALVADOR GUATEMALA PANAMA PERU PUERTO RICO URUGUAY UNITED STATES VENEZUELA MIDDLE EAST ALGERIA BAHRAIN BOTSWANA DUBAI EGYPT ETHIOPIA EQUATORIAL GUINEA IRAQ KUWAIT MOROCCO NIGERIA OMAN QATAR SAUDI ARABIA TUNISIA LOW-TAX JURISDICTIONS ANDORRA ARUBA BAHAMAS BARBADOS BELIZE BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS COOK ISLANDS CURACAO GIBRALTAR GUERNSEY ISLE OF MAN JERSEY LABUAN LIECHTENSTEIN MAURITIUS MONACO TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS VANUATU GLOBAL TAX WEEKLY a closer look Global Tax Weekly – A Closer Look Combining expert industry thought leadership and team of editors outputting 100 tax news stories a the unrivalled worldwide multi-lingual research week. GTW highlights 20 of these stories each week capabilities of leading law and tax publisher Wolters under a series of useful headings, including industry Kluwer, CCH publishes Global Tax Weekly –– A Closer sectors (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 69-88 Houtman Et Al F6.Indd
    The Actuality of Sacrifijice Past and Present Edited by Alberdina Houtman Marcel Poorthuis Joshua Schwartz Yossi Turner LEIDEN | BOSTON This is a digital offfprint for restricted use only | © 2014 Koninklijke Brill NV Contents List of Figures viii List of Contributors xi Introduction 1 Part 1 Archaeology and the Hebrew Bible 1 Conspicuous Destruction and the Economy of Sacrifijice in the Bronze and Early Iron Age East Mediterranean 9 Louise A. Hitchcock 2 Reading as an Act of Offfering: Reconsidering the Genre of Leviticus 1 34 Dorothea Erbele-Küster 3 The Death of Moses as a Sacrifijice of Atonement for the Sins of Israel: A Hidden Biblical Tradition 47 David Frankel Part 2 New Testament and post-Biblical Judaism 4 ‘So the Sons are Free’: The Temple Tax in the Matthean Community 71 Eric Ottenheijm 5 Sacrifijice in the Dead Sea Scrolls 89 Lawrence H. Schifffman 6 Jesus Christ, High Priest and Sacrifijice according to the Epistle to the Hebrews 107 Adelbert Denaux 7 Sacrifijice without the Rabbis: Ritual and Sacrifijice in the Second Temple Period according to Contemporary Sources 123 Joshua Schwartz This is a digital offfprint for restricted use only | © 2014 Koninklijke Brill NV vi contents Part 3 Early Christianity and Rabbinic Literature 8 Sacrifijice in ‘Gnostic’ Testimonies of the Second and Third Centuries ce 153 Riemer Roukema 9 Sacrifijice as Concession in Christian and Jewish Sources: The Didascalia Apostolorum and Rabbinic Literature 170 Marcel Poorthuis 10 Putting One’s Life on the Line: The Meaning of heʿerah lamavet nafsho and Similar Expressions 192 Alberdina Houtman 11 Ritual is with People: Sacrifijice and Society in Palestinian Yoma Traditions 206 Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxury Tax: to Be Or Not to Be? to What Extent Will Nigeria Benefit from the Proposed Luxury Tax?
    Luxury Tax: To be or not to be? To what extent will Nigeria benefit from the proposed luxury tax? Introducing luxury tax on certain items would increase the cost of those goods or services; therefore, more individuals may opt to make purchase at cheaper prices from the black market. An increased patronage of the black market is especially problematic because when taxable persons begin to operate in the informal market, the tax base is eroded. By: Bitrus Baba Introduction In recent times, the Nigerian Government has been showing interest in this form of taxation as Whether it seems timely or a little too late, a response to the declining revenues from oil Nigeria seems to be keen on measures to make and to deal with social imbalance. In November the “rich” pay more and therefore address 2014, the past administration announced plans redistribution of wealth through taxation of to introduce luxury taxes in the form of luxury items. surcharges on items such as private jets, luxury yachts, luxury cars, business class/first class tickets on airlines etc. The plan at the time Generally, luxury tax is a tax on luxury goods included the following: and services i.e. goods and services that are not essential and consumed by only a niche. It could be implemented through a sales tax system, 10% import surcharge on new private jets; value added tax system, or customs duty system 39% import surcharge on luxury yachts; of taxation. It typically affects the wealthy as 5% import surcharge on luxury cars; opposed to the vast majority of the populace undisclosed surcharge on business and first because the wealthy are the most likely to class plane tickets; purchase luxury items.
    [Show full text]