DOCSLIB.ORG

DESIGN of TWO NEW ELEVATORS for MANHATTAN TRAM STATION 254 EAST 60Th STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10022

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DESIGN of TWO NEW ELEVATORS for MANHATTAN TRAM STATION 254 EAST 60Th STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10022 ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DESIGN OF TWO NEW ELEVATORS FOR MANHATTAN TRAM STATION 254 EAST 60th STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10022 GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 PROJECT PROPOSAL Modernization of the Manhattan 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 Aerial Tramway at 60th Street and TEL: 212.832.4540 2nd Avenue, Tramway Plaza NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 GOALS TEL: 212.830.7700 • Two New Glass Elevators • Increased User Capacity • ADA Compliant Elevators • Enhanced Destination Visibility • Greater Reliability & Maintainability • Increased Lighting and Security • Improved Circulation VIEW OF EXISTING TRAM STATION GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 TEL: 212.830.7700 VIEW OF EXISTING STATION FROM 2ND AVE. GC ENG & ASSOCIATES VIEW OF TRAMWAY PLAZA FROM 60TH & 2ND VIEW OF EXISTING ELEVATORS 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 60TH STREET DN ELECTRICAL ROOM 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF STAIR A PARKS & RECREATION EXISTING STAIR 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 TEL: 212.830.7700 REMOVE EXISTING HYDRAULIC PUMP, CONTROLLER, SWITCHES, ETC. SEE DN ELEV. MEP DRAWINGS MACH. RM (PHASE 2) STAIR B EXISTING STATION TOILET TOILET ROOMS, STAIRS TO REMAIN DN VIEW OF EXISTING ELEVATORS AT PLATFORM LEVEL. E EXISTING STATION PLATFORM & STAIRS TO REMAIN REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING PAVERS AND EXTENT OF EXISTING RAIL TO BE AVENU ELEVATOR AFTER ADA LIFT (PHASE 1) EXCAVATION (PHASE 1) REMOVED (PHASE 2) INSTALLATION OF NEW ELEVATORS (PHASE 2) DN 2ND REMOVE EXISTING ADA LIFT (PHASE 1) REMOVE EXISTING ELEVATOR AFTER EXISTING STAIR INSTALLATION OF NEW TO REMAIN ELEVATORS. (PHASE 2) EXISTING UP LIGHTING POLE TO REMAIN EXISTING STATION STAIR TO REMAIN REMOVE EXISTING TREES AND TREEPITS. (PHASE 1) REMOVE EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE WITH FOOTING (PHASE 1) REMOVE EXISTING PAVERS AND EXTENT OF EXCAVATION (PHASE 1) GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 VIEW OF EXISTING ELEVATORS AT GROUND LEVEL EXISTING SITE PLAN TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 03 EXISTING CONDITIONS (CONT.) 60TH STREET 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF E PARKS & RECREATION NU E 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 AV TEL: 212.830.7700 2ND PROJECT SITE PROPOSED NEW ELEVATOR FROM 2ND AVE PROPOSED NEW SITE PLAN GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 04 NEW PROPOSAL & SITE PLAN 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 TEL: 212.830.7700 NEW LOCATION OF NEW NEW STRUCTURAL EXISTING STRUCTURAL STRUCTURAL COLUMN ELEVATOR COLUMN COLUMN 1 " 6 - ' 2 1 2 1" THICK T TEMPERED "/F 25 GLASS TYP. .06 - 0 LADDERS TO +/ PIT PE LO UP . S NC CO CONCRETE FOUNDATION " BELOW 0 ELEVATOR 1 ELEVATOR 2 1 CONCRETE BEAM @ - ' GROUND LEVEL 8 CONCRETE CONCRETE SLAB BELOW SLAB BELOW 2'x2'x2' SUMP PIT W/ STEEL 8" x 8" STEEL PERFORATED COVER FLUSH TUBE COLUMN W/ PIT FLOOR TYP. NEW PAVERS TO 3 MATCH EXISTING AS REQUIRED 9' - 4 1/2" 9' - 4 1/2" C B A GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 05 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION DN 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 TEL: 212.830.7700 NEW SECURITY GATE LOCATION OF EXISTING ELEVATOR 1 FORM FORM T T 21 MM A A PL PL WINDSCREEN OUTRIGGER 2 1 BELOW GLASS PAHSE PHASE NEW ELEVATOR LANDING UP EXPANSION JOINT HANDRAIL " 2 3 / 9 1 DN - ' " 2 6 1 - ' 2 1 NEW SHIPS LADDER TO MACHINE ROOM WITH SECURITY GATE 2 1" THICK TEMPERED GLASS TYP. NEW ELEVATOR ELEVATOR 1 ELEVATOR 2 " 0 1 - ' 8 8" x 8" STEEL TUBE COLUMN TYP. 3 9' - 4 1/2" 9' - 4 1/2" C B A GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 PLATFORM LEVEL FLOOR PLAN TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 06 PLATFORM LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 TEL: 212.830.7700 VIEW OF PROPOSED NEW BRIDGE & WIND SCREEN AT PLATFORM LEVEL GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 07 PROPOSED PLATFORM EXTENSION A B C D 3 2 2.5 1 9' - 4 1/2" 9' - 4 1/2" 5' - 11 3/4" 8' - 10" 4' - 3 3/4" 8' - 2 1/4" 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 TEL: 212.830.7700 B.O. STATION ROOF B.O. STATION ROOF 120' - 2" 120' - 2" 5' - 0 13/16" 5' - 0 13/16" 5' - 0 13/16" 5' - 0 13/16" 5' - 2" 5' - 2" 4' - 3 15/16" T.O. GLASS T.O. GLASS 118' - 2 11/16" EXISTING 118' - 2 11/16" TRAM " " " STATION 0 6 6 - ' 1 1 / / STRUCTUR 4 1 EXISTING TRAM 1 1 1 E TO 0 STATION 0 1 1 REMAIN - - ' STRUCTURE ROOF LEVEL ' ROOF LEVEL 5 BEYOND TO 114' - 2 11/16" 5 114' - 2 11/16" REMAIN " 2 GLASS PANEL / 1 7 ELEVATOR - GLASS PANEL ENCLOSURE 9' " ELEVATOR " 0 0 - - SHAFT ' ' 9 ENCLOSURE 9 MACH. RM LEVEL MACH. RM LEVEL 104' - 7 7/32" 104' - 7 7/32" NEW SHIPS LADDER GLASS CANOPY FOR RAIN & WIND PROTECTION GLASS CANOPY " " 0 FOR RAIN & 0 - - ' WIND ' 9 9 3' - 9 5/8" 4' - 0 9/32" PROTECTION LOCATION OF EXISTING " 4 ELEVATOR / 1 3 - ' 19 " 0 - ' 6 1 STEEL BALUSTER W/ ELEVATOR NEW CALL BUTTONS SECURITY " " 0 GATE 0 - - ' ' GLASS GUARD RAIL 9 WROUGHT 9 IRON FENCE 2ND FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 85' - 4" 85' - 4" " " 0 2 - 3 ' / 9 7 1 5 - ' 7 LINE OF EXISTING CONCRETE ELEVATOR " 0 - ' 8 1 " " 0 0 - - ' ' 9 9 STEEL BALUSTER W/ ELEVATOR CALL BUTTONS 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR 67' - 4" 67' - 4" 3' - 1" 2' - 7 5/8" 2' - 7 5/8" 3' - 1" NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 08 NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS D C B A 1 2.5 2 3 5' - 11 3/4" 9' - 4 1/2" 9' - 4 1/2" 8' - 2 1/4" 4' - 3 3/4" 8' - 10" 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF 4' - 3 15/16" 5' - 2" 5' - 2" PARKS & RECREATION 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 B.O. STATION ROOF 120' - 2" 5' - 0 13/16" 5' - 0 13/16" 5' - 0 13/16" 5' - 0 13/16" TEL: 212.830.7700 EXISTING STATION EXISTING TRAM T.O. GLASS ROOF TO REMAIN T.O. GLASS STATION STRUCTURE 118' - 2 11/16" 118' - 2 11/16" BEYOND TO REMAIN " " " 0 6 6 - ' 1 1 / / 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 - - ' ROOF LEVEL ' ROOF LEVEL 5 114' - 2 11/16" 5 114' - 2 11/16" NEW GLASS " 2 / PANEL ELEVATOR 1 7 SHAFT - ENCLOSURE 9' DOOR TO " " 0 0 MACHINE ROOM - - ' ' 9 9 MACH. RM LEVEL MACH. RM LEVEL 104' - 7 7/32" 104' - 7 7/32" GLASS CANOPY FOR RAIN & WIND NEW SHIPS PROTECTION LADDER TO ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM " " 0 0 - - ' ' 9 9 EXISTING STAIR TO REMAIN " 4 / 1 3 - LOCATION OF ' EXISTING 19 ELEVATOR NEW SHIPS LADDER " " 0 0 - - ' ' 9 9 NEW SECURITY GATE 2ND FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 85' - 4" 85' - 4" " " 0 0 - - ' ' 9 9 EXISTING STATION STRUCTURE TO REMAIN " 0 - ' 8 1 " " 0 0 - - ' ' 9 9 1ST FLOOR 1ST FLOOR 67' - 4" 67' - 4" SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 09 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 TEL: 212.830.7700 VIEW OF PROPOSED NEW ELEVATOR GC ENG & ASSOCIATES 141 W 28TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10001 TEL: 212.695.531 FAX: 212.695.5170 10 PROPOSED NEW ELEVATOR D C B A 3 2 2.5 1 5' - 11 3/4" 9' - 4 1/2" 9' - 4 1/2" 8' - 10" 4' - 3 3/4" 8' - 2 1/4" 591 MAIN ST. NEW YORK, NY 10044 TEL: 212.832.4540 NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION B.O. STATION ROOF B.O. STATION ROOF COMBINED 120' - 2" 120' - 2" ROOF FAN. LOUVER AND 24 W 61ST ST, NEW YORK, NY 10023 SEE MECH SMOKE HATCH T.O. GLASS DRAWINGS T.O. GLASS TEL: 212.830.7700 118' - 2 11/16" 118' - 2 11/16" EXISTING TRAM STATION ROOF HATCH " " 0 0 STRUCTURE TO - - WITH LOUVERED ' ' REMAIN SIDES 4 4 ROOF LEVEL ROOF LEVEL 114' - 2 11/16" 114' - 2 11/16" GLASS SHAFT " " ENCLOUSRE ON 2 2 / / 1 1 STEEL " 7 7 0 " - - - STRUCTURE 0 ' 9' 9' - 8 ' 8 HOIST HOIST MACHINE MACHINE NEW SHIPS LADDER GLASS CANOPY MACH.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Improving Elevator Performance by Monitoring Elevator Cab Volume by James O’Laughlin
    EW ECO-ISSUES: Continuing Education Improving Elevator Performance by Monitoring Elevator Cab Volume by James O’Laughlin Learning Objectives After reading this article, you should: N Understand why some elevator applications have the problem of full elevator cabs stopping unnecessarily to service hall calls. N Be able to describe several methods that help minimize the problem of full elevator cabs stopping unnecessarily to serv- ice hall calls. N Recognize why camera technol- ogy provides a better solution for monitoring consumed elevator- cab volume. N Know the application require- ments for monitoring consumed CEDES ESPROS/VOL camera installation (photo elevator-cab volume using courtesy of New York Elevator) infrared camera technology. sponding to hall calls. Increasing the N Obtain knowledge regarding the number of elevators is one possibil- installation and operation of the ity, but is generally cost prohibitive. CEDES ESPROS/VOL Camera Destination-dispatch systems can sensor. also help to alleviate this issue. How- ever, destination-dispatch systems Optimal elevator system perform- are best implemented in new instal- ance has always been a concern for lations, and also may be cost prohib- facilities and building management. itive for modernization applications. People expect that the elevator will More cost-effective solutions include Value: 1 contact hour arrive shortly after they press the hall using load-weighing systems or call button. When the elevator ar- camera-based monitoring to deter- This article is part of ELEVATOR WORLD’s mine a threshold that corresponds to rives, people are disappointed when Continuing Education program. Elevator-industry it is full, and they have to press the the consumed volume inside the ele- personnel required to obtain continuing-education hall call button and wait for the next vator cab.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Commerce Commission in Re
    INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION IN RE INVESTIGATION OF AM" ACCIDENT WHICH OCCURRED ON THE DENVER & INTERURBAN RAILROAD, NEAR GLOBEVILLE, COLO , ON SEPTEMBER 6, 1920 November 17, 1920 To the Commission On September G, 1920, there was a hoad-end collision between two passenger tiams on the Denvei & Intemiban Railioad neai Globe ville, Colo , which lesulted m the death of 11 passengeis and 2 em­ ployees, and the injury of 209 passengers and 5 employees This accident was investigated jointly with the Public Utilities Commis­ sion of Coloiado, and as a result of this investigation I lespectfully submit the following lepoit The Dem ei & Interurban Railioacl is a bianch of the Coloiado & Southern Railway, the rules of which govern Denver & Interurban trains Donvei & Intemiban tiains aie opeiated between Denvei and Bouldei, 31 miles noith of Denvei, over the Denvei Tiamway Co's tiacks between Denvei and Globeville and ovei Denvei & In­ temiban tiacks between Globeville and Denver & Inteiuiban Junc­ tion, at which point the line blanches, one line extending to Louis­ ville Junction and the othei to Webb Junction, and between these two junctions and Bouldei the trains of the Denvei & Inteiuiban j.»,ailroad opeiate over the tiacks of the Colorado & Southern Kail- way From Marshall, between Louisville Junction and Bouldei, a bianch line .extends to Eldorado Spimgs, this is also used jointly by the tiams of the two laihoads On this line Denvei & Intel urban employees aie ordinarily re­ lieved by Denver Tiamway employees at Globeville, the tiamway employees
    [Show full text]
  • From the 1832 Horse Pulled Tramway to 21Th Century Light Rail Transit/Light Metro Rail - a Short History of the Evolution in Pictures
    From the 1832 Horse pulled Tramway to 21th Century Light Rail Transit/Light Metro Rail - a short History of the Evolution in Pictures By Dr. F.A. Wingler, September 2019 Animation of Light Rail Transit/ Light Metro Rail INTRODUCTION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Light Metro Rail (LMR) Systems operates with Light Rail Vehicles (LRV). Those Light Rail Vehicles run in urban region on Streets on reserved or unreserved rail tracks as City Trams, elevated as Right-of-Way Trams or Underground as Metros, and they can run also suburban and interurban on dedicated or reserved rail tracks or on main railway lines as Commuter Rail. The invest costs for LRT/LMR are less than for Metro Rail, the diversity is higher and the adjustment to local conditions and environment is less complicated. Whereas Metro Rail serves only certain corridors, LRT/LRM can be installed with dense and branched networks to serve wider areas. 1 In India the new buzzword for LRT/LMR is “METROLIGHT” or “METROLITE”. The Indian Central Government proposes to run light urban metro rail ‘Metrolight’ or Metrolite” for smaller towns of various states. These transits will operate in places, where the density of people is not so high and a lower ridership is expected. The Light Rail Vehicles will have three coaches, and the speed will be not much more than 25 kmph. The Metrolight will run along the ground as well as above on elevated structures. Metrolight will also work as a metro feeder system. Its cost is less compared to the metro rail installations.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Changes in Rail Shipping Mechanisms for Grain
    Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 798 June 2020 Dynamic Changes in Rail Shipping Mechanisms for Grain Dr. William W Wilson Department of Agribusiness & Applied Economics Agricultural Experiment Station North Dakota State University Fargo, ND 58108-6050 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS NDSU does not discriminate in its programs and activities on the basis of age, color, gender expression/identity, genetic information, marital status, national origin, participation in lawful off-campus activity, physical or mental disability, pregnancy, public assistance status, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, spousal relationship to current employee, or veteran status, as applicable. Direct inquiries to Vice Provost for Title IX/ADA Coordinator, Old Main 201, NDSU Main Campus, 7901-231-7708, ndsu.eoaa.ndsu.edu. This publication will be made available in alternative formats for people with disabilities upon request, 701-231-7881. NDSU is an equal opportunity institution. Copyright ©2020 by William W. Wilson. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided this copyright notice appears on all such copies. ABSTRACT Grain shipping involves many sources of risk and uncertainty. In response to these dynamic challenges faced by shippers, railroad carriers offer various types of forward contracting and allocation instruments. An important feature of the U.S. grain marketing system is that there are now a number of pricing and allocation mechanisms used by most rail carriers. These have evolved since the late 1980’s and have had important changes in their features over time. The operations and impact of these mechanisms are not well understood, yet are frequently the subject of public criticism and studies and at the same time are revered by (some) market participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Iiii3 9080 02993 0523Iiii
    MIT LIBRARIESI IIII390803 0002993 02993 0523IIII0523 .2: HYDDIEAICS THE HYDROFOIL BOAT (Dos Tragflugelboot) AME 'IGCS Dipl..Ing. K. Bililer STRUCTURAL MECHANICS Translated by E.N. Lobouvie, Ph. D. APPLIED MAhETICS December 1959 Translation 293 PrNC-TN~6 (Rev. 9-b8) ' II This tuwstln.to be disdnd oely wNlt~ith m s thmit off tA* IWld States Ord ts TnrlfftwIn. ,IMI ilMMIM liIIi i il li 111 . -,11 THE HYDROFOIL BOAT (Das Tragfliigelboot) by Dipl.-Ing. K. Builler HANSA, No. 33/34 (1952), p. 1090 Translated by E.N. Labouvie, Ph. D. December 1959 Translation 293 ABSTRACT This report gives a short summary of the development of the hydrofoil boat during the past 50 years. The limitations of size, the power required, and the stability of these high-speed boats are discussed. 6nrr I- I I_, I I __I 311~ba~ 0 'THE HYDROFOIL BOAT Although work has been going forward on the development of the hydrofoil boat for more than fifty years and although a number of such boats of the most diverse types and sizes have been constructed, the general public is not very familiar with this type of high-speed craft. However, the state of research and technology as well as the test results obtained with hydrofoil boats built thus far have enabled us for years to utilize hydrofoil boats which are of considerable size and are safe to operate in ship traffic. The technical and economic inter- est presently being shown in these boats justifies the assumption that the hydrofoil boat will soon develop into a familiar means of transportation in high-speed ship traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolleybuses: Applicability of UN Regulation No
    Submitted by the expert from OICA Informal document GRSG-110-08-Rev.1 (110th GRSG, 26-29 April 2016, agenda item 2(a)) Trolleybuses: Applicability of UN Regulation No. 100 (Electric Power Train Vehicle) vs. UN Regulation No. 107 Annex 12 (Construction of M2/M3 Vehicles) for Electrical Safety 1. At 110th session of GRSG Belgium proposes to amend UN R107 annex 12 by deleting the requirements for trolleybuses (see GRSG/2016/05) and transfer the requirements into UN R100 (see GRSP/2016/07), which will be on the agenda of upcoming GRSP session in May 2016. 2. Due to the design of a trolleybus and stated in UN Regulation No. 107, trolleybuses are dual- mode vehicles. They can operate either: (a) in trolley mode, when connected to the overhead contact line (OCL), or (b) in bus mode when not connected to the OCL. When not connected to the OCL, they can also be (c) in charging mode, where they are stationary and plugged into the power grid for battery charging. 3. The basic principles of the design of the electric powertrain of the trolleybus and the connection to the OCL is based on international standards developed for trams and trains and is implemented and well accepted in the market worldwide. 4. Due to the fact that the trolleybus is used on public roads the trolleybus has to fulfil the regulations under the umbrella of the UNECE regulatory framework due to the existing national regulations (e.g. European frame work directive). 5. Therefore the annex 12 in UN R107 was amended to align the additional safety prescriptions for trolleybuses with the corresponding electrical standards.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEVATOR INTERIOR DESIGN DESIGN SERIES Contact & About Table of Contents
    ELEVATOR INTERIOR DESIGN DESIGN SERIES Contact & About Table of Contents Website www.ElevatorID.com Section 1 Contact / About EID • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Address 100 Marine Blvd Section 2 Elevator Cab Design Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 Lynn, MA 01905 Elevator Cab Design Elevator Cab Series 100 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5 Telephone (781) 596-4200 Elevator Cab Series 200 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 7 Fax (781) 596-4222 Elevator Cab Series 300 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 Elevator Cab Series 400 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 Note: An employee directory and further contact information is available on our website. Please visit ElevatorID.com/contact Elevator Cab Series 500 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 13 Section 3 Island Ceiling Design • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 15 Formed to meet the needs of the ever expanding demands Through inventive collaboration and fusion of your About Elevator Interior Design Elevator Component Design Elevator Handrail Design • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 17 and creative passions that fuel our world, Elevator Interior ideas along with our product expertise and command of Design provides the finest elevator cabs in the industry. materials, we deliver an elevator cab design that stretches the boundaries of imagination. Section 4 Material Selection Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 19
    [Show full text]
  • Elevator Cab Refurbishment Specification
    Elevator Cab Refurbishment Specification LOCATION OF PROPERTY: EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: UC Hastings Three (3) Traction Elevators 100 McAllister St. San Francisco, CA SPECIFICATION TYPE: SPECIFICATION DATE: Elevator Cab Refurbishment April 4, 2018 Part I: General Conditions A. Form of Agreement 1. This Specification was written to be included as an attachment to a refurbishment or construction form of agreement. Throughout this document, the word “Agreement” shall refer to that agreement, as well as any/all attachments, including this specification. It is acknowledged that, in some cases, terms and conditions found in this Specification may overlap with terms and conditions found in the Agreement. In most cases, such overlap will occur because this Specification has terms specific to an elevator refurbishment, versus the Agreement which is a general document. Wherever overlap or conflict exists within or between any portion of the Agreement and any attachment, the most stringent terms and conditions shall apply. 2. If any conflict or discrepancy occurs in this specification with respect to the work specified, Contractor shall notify ECA immediately so that ECA may issue an appropriate amendment to the specification. If such a conflict or discrepancy is discovered after the award of the Agreement, it shall be assumed that Contractor has bid according to the more expensive option. In no case shall a chargeable change order result from a conflict or discrepancy within the Agreement. B. Scope 1. The scope of this specification and the resulting Agreement is for the cab refurbishment of the subject elevator equipment. Contractor is fully responsible for all work required to perform the refurbishment according to industry standards and all applicable codes, laws and guidelines as modified by any authority having jurisdiction, except where specific tasks and functions are explicitly stated within the Agreement to be the responsibility of another party.
    [Show full text]
  • Grain and Soybean Industry Dynamics and Rail Service
    Grain and Soybean Industry Dynamics and Rail Service Analytical Models of Rail Service Operations Final Report Michael Hyland, Hani Mahmassani, Lama Bou Mjahed, and Breton Johnson Northwestern University Transportation Center (NUTC) Parr Rosson Texas A&M University 1 Executive Summary To remain globally competitive, the United States’ grain industry and associated transportation services underwent significant restructuring over the past fifteen years. New technologies, helped by weather changes, led to sustained yield volume increases in the Upper Midwest. To move larger volumes faster and at lower cost, the railroad industry introduced shuttle train service. Traveling as a unit to the same destination, shuttle trains save considerable time in transit and potential delay, bypassing intermediate classification yards. Grain shippers concurrently began consolidating and storing grain in larger, more efficient terminal elevators (shuttle loaders) instead of country elevators. This report examines the effectiveness of shuttle train service and the terminal elevators supporting the shuttle train system, under different demand levels, through the formulation of simple mathematical models. In order to compare shuttle and conventional rail service, this paper introduces three distinct models. The first model, referred to as the ‘time model’, determines the time it takes to transport grain from the farm to a destination (e.g. an export elevator). The second model, referred to as the ‘engineering cost model’, determines the aggregate variable costs of transporting grain from the farm to an export elevator. The third model, referred to as the ‘capacity model’, determines the maximum attainable capacity (i.e. throughput) of a rail network as a function of demand for rail transport and the percentage of railcars on the network being moved via shuttle service and conventional service.
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska Railway Council Study
    NEBRASKA RAILWAY COUNCIL STUDY Wilbur Smith Associates in association with HWS Consulting Group Denver Tolliver, Ph.D. NEBRASKA RAILWAY COUNCIL STUDY prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates in association with HWS Consulting Group Denver Tolliver, Ph.D. December 4, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page No. 1 Nebraska Rail System 1-1 Rail System Components 1-1 Freight Railroads 1-1 Rail System Use 1-5 Rail Freight Traffic 1-6 Traffic Density 1-8 2 Grain Transportation 2-1 Modal Share 2-1 Rail Shipments 2-2 Strategic Agricultural Issues 2-4 Railroad Rates and Grain Elevator Network Characteristics 2-8 3 Light Density Lines 3-1 Light Density Line System 3-1 Screening Process 3-3 Core System Delineation 3-5 LDL Core System 3-6 Appendices Appendix A – Grain Transportation Analysis Appendix B – Light Density Lines Appendix C – LDL Elevator Locations Nebraska Railway Council Study i EXHIBITS Exhibit No. Page No. 1-1 Nebraska Rail System 1-2 1-2 Nebraska Freight Railroads 2002 1-3 1-3 Nebraska Rail Movements 2000 1-6 1-4 Nebraska Rail Commodity Volumes 2000 1-7 1-5 Destination of Shipments Originating in Nebraska 1-9 1-6 Origination of Shipments Terminating in Nebraska 1-10 1-7 Nebraska Rail Density 1-11 2-1 Nebraska Cereal Grain Transportation 1997 2-1 2-2 Nebraska Rail Grain Shipments 2000 2-2 2-3 Rail Grain Destinations 2000 2-3 2-4 Major Grain Elevators and Corn Production by County 2-5 2-5 Ethanol Plants Nebraska 2-6 2-6 Inbound Grain Shipment Distances 2-8 2-7 Grain Elevator Delivery Truck Configurations 2-9 2-8 Shuttle Elevator Radial Market 2-10 3-1 Nebraska Light Density Line System 3-2 3-2 LDL System by Railroad 3-1 3-3 Screening Process Flow Diagram 3-4 3-4 LDL Core System 3-7 3-5 Core System Light Density Lines 3-8 Nebraska Railway Council Study ii Chapter 1 NEBRASKA RAIL SYSTEM This chapter defines the Nebraska rail system by describing the major characteristics of each of the system’s components and the use made of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Monica Smiley Sand Tram
    Santa Monica Smiley Sand Tram TRANSFORMING BEACH PARKING, TRANSPORTATION AND ACCESS Prepared by Santa Monica Pier Restoration Corporation, February 2006 Concept History In the fall of 2004 a long-term event was staged in the 1550 parking lot occupying over 70% of the lot. The event producer was required to implement shuttle service from the south beach parking lots up to the Pier. A local business man offered the use of an open air propane powered tram and on October 5, 2004 at 8pm, the tram was dropped off in the 2030 Barnard Way parking lot for an initial trial run. The tram was an instant hit. Tram use in Santa Monica is not a new concept. A Santa Monica ordinance adopted in 1971 allows for the operation of trams along Ocean Front Walk and electric trams were operated between Santa Monica and Venice throughout the 1920’s. Electric trams took passengers between the Venice and Santa Monica Piers. - 1920 In 2004, due to pedestrian traffic concerns, Ocean Front Walk was not utilized for the tram. Instead, the official route for the tram was established along the streets running one block east of the beach. This route required extensive traffic management and, while providing effective transportation, provided limited access to the world-class beach. At a late-night brainstorming session on how to improve the route SMPD Sergeant Greg Smiley suggested that the tram run on the sand. With the emerging vision of the “Beach Tram”, the Santa Monica Pier Restoration Corporation began the process of research, prototype design and consideration of the issues this concept would raise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Rail Development Handbook
    DEVELOPMENT THE “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook offers both planners and political decision makers a comprehensive view of one of the largest, if not the largest, investment a city can undertake: an urban rail system. The handbook properly recognizes that urban rail is only one part of a hierarchically integrated transport system, and it provides practical guidance on how urban rail projects can be implemented and operated RAIL URBAN THE URBAN RAIL in a multimodal way that maximizes benefits far beyond mobility. The handbook is a must-read for any person involved in the planning and decision making for an urban rail line.” —Arturo Ardila-Gómez, Global Lead, Urban Mobility and Lead Transport Economist, World Bank DEVELOPMENT “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook tackles the social and technical challenges of planning, designing, financing, procuring, constructing, and operating rail projects in urban areas. It is a great complement HANDBOOK to more technical publications on rail technology, infrastructure, and project delivery. This handbook provides practical advice for delivering urban megaprojects, taking account of their social, institutional, and economic context.” —Martha Lawrence, Lead, Railway Community of Practice and Senior Railway Specialist, World Bank HANDBOOK “ Among the many options a city can consider to improve access to opportunities and mobility, urban rail stands out by its potential impact, as well as its high cost. Getting it right is a complex and multifaceted challenge that this handbook addresses beautifully through an in-depth and practical sharing of hard lessons learned in planning, implementing, and operating such urban rail lines, while ensuring their transformational role for urban development.” —Gerald Ollivier, Lead, Transit-Oriented Development Community of Practice, World Bank “ Public transport, as the backbone of mobility in cities, supports more inclusive communities, economic development, higher standards of living and health, and active lifestyles of inhabitants, while improving air quality and liveability.
    [Show full text]