Economic and Political Factors That Influenced Indonesian Pressin the Era of New Order Regime
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL GEOGRAPHICAL EDUCATION ISSN: 2146-0353 ● © RIGEO ● 11(3), SUMMER, 2021 www.rigeo.org Research Article Economic and Political Factors That Influenced Indonesian Pressin the Era of New Order Regime Budi Santoso1 Aceng Abdullah2 Communication Science Faculty, Padjadjaran Communication Science Faculty, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia University, Indonesia Dian Wardiana Sjuchro3 Eni Maryani4 Communication Science Faculty, Padjadjaran Communication Science Faculty, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia University, Indonesia 1Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract This article aims to provide a critical analysis of the economic and political dimensions of the Indonesian press during the New Order era. It is generally known that the press system implemented by the New Order regime was a free and responsible Pancasila-leaning press. The press is free to report events that occur but must comply with regulations and procedures determined by the government. In practice, the press during the New Order era was not free to carry out its journalistic roles and functions, especially to report the realities related to government policies. This research shows that the political economy dimensions of the Indonesian press during the New Order era were interrelated. As a company, the press had to get economic income in order to keep it published, on the other hand, the press was very dependent on the repressive political system implemented by the New Order so that it could not freely criticize the policies adopted by the government. Keywords Press, Economic and Political Interests, New Order To cite this article: Santoso B, Abdullah A, Sjuchro D, W, and Maryani E. (2021). Economic and Political Factors That Influenced Indonesian Pressin the Era of New Order Regime. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(3), 1227-1236. Doi: 10.48047/rigeo.11.3.113 Submitted: 10-01-2021 ● Revised: 01-02-2021 ● Accepted: 21-03-2021 © RIGEO ● Review of International Geographical Education 11(3), SUMMER, 2021 Introduction In Indonesian Press Law Number 40/1999, it is clearly stated that the press is not only a social institution that carries out journalistic functions but also as an economic institution. This means that the press is part of the economic system which in many ways is closely related to the political system. When departing from a critical paradigm, the press is positioned as an instrument or means of control for the dominant elite or the ruler to hegemony and control public spaces subtly through the domination of news and other forms of content. If so, then the political economy position of the press institution can be studied using critical political economy theory. Press essentially function as a medium for community communication, as a bridge connecting all groups or social powers. It actually provides information that should be designed and aimed at discovering the truth of facts and events. But philosophically, the main purpose of the press is to support, criticize and advance government policy. As a communication medium, press does not only present information in the form of news, but also provides public spaces where ideas and interests meet. So it can be said that press stands on two interests, namely the interests of the government (rulers) and the public interest. In order to see the political economy interests of Indonesian press during the New Order era, it is appropriate to mention what factors have influenced the role and function of the press in general.Martini (2014) suggests three main factors that can influence the role of the press, namely, (1) The political system and government. It is clearly knows that the press (in all forms) that operates in a liberal democratic country has a greater opportunity to criticize government policies. They have the political courage to disclose government actions because they receive open support from the public. The Watergate case in America in the early 70'sshows this. On the other hand, the press in authoritarian countries, such as in Indonesia during the New Order era, will receive strong warnings and even revoke its licenses. The case of Tempo magazine’s revocation of issuance permits after reporting the case of ex Germany warship in 1994 showed it. (2) The commitment of the parties involved. This commitment is not only a commitment from the members of the press but also a commitment from the authorities (government). If the commitment made by each party is positive, then the press will develop well. Conversely, if the commitment is not well developed, in the sense that each party thinks of its own interests, then the press will only be an institution with a small, meaningless role. (3) The investor's vision. The owner's vision is an important factor in determining the direction rather than the role and function of the press. Press company owners who tend to only care about economic interests rather than will also tend to limit coverage that has the potential to hinder gaining profits. Conversely, if the vision of the owners of capital is to educate the public to be aware of their rights and obligations, then the press company will be more critical of government policies or other issues related to the public interest. The Indonesian press after the New Order initially experienced great joy. This is understandable as a sense of wild joy that arises due to the limited space for so long, especially in relation to government policies. The restraint caused by the hegemony of the authorities wrapped in the legitimacy of licensing in the form of a Press Issuance Business Permit (SIUPP) is an indisputable reality. The SIUPP is a powerful weapon for the government to measure the obedience of the press to the government, including revoking the press business license if it intersects with the interests of the authorities. At that time, the press actually enjoyed a honeymoon at the beginning of the New Order government which needed support from various existing social forces. The New Order tried to build partnerships with these social forces based on the principle of mutual understanding. But in reality, the press must submit to the powers that apply authoritarianism. No less than 18 media have experienced the bitterness of being bulldozed, including Tempo, Sinar Harapan, and Harian Abadi (Ishak, 2014). During the reformation era, the press was very much felt. changes are not only at the level of structure, namely the establishment of a press business, but also in various types and forms of media, content and style of news, and methods of obtaining information. Literature Review Critical political economy theory is based on the thoughts of Marxists who value the mass media as a hegemonic tool and the legitimacy of the ruler in maintaining the dominant ideology over other social forces (Ibrahim & Akhmad, 2014). The public is unconsciously or slightly aware, carried away and agrees with the dominant discourse constructed by the media. McQuail (2010) defines 1228 Santoso B, Abdullah A, Sjuchro D, W, and Maryani E. (2021). Economic and Political Factors That … it as "a social criticism approach that focuses on the relationship between the economic structure and the dynamics of the media industry as well as the ideological content of the media". Political economy theory places a priority in understanding how economic power becomes the basis for political and ideological power (Ibrahim & Akhmad, 2014). McQuail then more broadly mapped the relevance of this critical political economy theory with several aspects, based on the research results of several media scientists such as (Holtz-Bacha & Norris, 2000; McChesney, 2000; McQuail and Siune (1998); Moran et al.,1990; Murdock & Golding, 1990; Suarez & Sussman, 1997; Van Cuilenburg & McQuail, 2003; Wasko, 2004). First, the growth of media concentration in the world with the concentration of ownership of the few and the merging of the hardware and software industries. Second, there is economic and information growth globally, due to the wider convergence between telecommunications and broadcasting. Third, there is a decline in the public sector of mass media and telecommunications control to the public directly (especially in Western Europe), in the form of deregulation, privatization, and liberalization. And fourth, there is information inequality in terms of the use of sophisticated communication facilities and the quality of their use. From this, it can be seen that the media are running on the logic of ownership and financial strength as the main foundations that support the media industry. If McQuail defines political economy broadly, Vincent Mosco in the first page of the second edition of The Political Economy of Communication, published in 2009, tends to narrow it down. He stated that in a specific sense political economy is the study of the social relations, particularly the power relations, that mutually constitute the production, distribution, and consumption of resources, including communication resources. This definition, continued Mosco, has practical values because it is related to how a communication business (media) operates. The main idea of the above limitation is that there are aspects of power relations behind the activities of production, distribution and consumption of communication resources. Mosco then sharpens the definition by stating that the core idea of political economy is control and survival in life. Control refers specifically to how a society organizes itself, manages its affairs and adapts, or fails to adapt, to the inevitable changes that all societies face. Survival means how people produce what they need to reproduce themselves and to keep their society going. According to this interpretation, control is a political process because it shapes the relationships within a community, and survival is mainly economic because it involves the process of production and reproduction. In Mosco's logic, control is a political process because it shapes the relationships that occur in a society, because policies and regulations are the result of a political process.