DOCSLIB.ORG

State of Housing in India- a Statistical Compendium 2013 Size

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

lR;eso t;rs STATESTATE OFOF HOUSINGHOUSING ININ INDIAINDIA STATE OF HOUSING IN INDIA STATE AA STATISTICALSTATISTICAL COMPENDIUMCOMPENDIUM 20132013 A STATISTICAL COMPENDIUM 2013 A STATISTICAL lR;eso t;rs Director (NBO) & OSD (JNNURM & RAY) Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation Room No. – 210, G-Wing, NBO Building, lR;eso t;rs Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 110108 Government of India Tel:- +91-11-23061692, Fax : +-91-11-23061542 Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation E-mail:- [email protected] National Buildings Organisation Hkkjr esa vkoklksa dh fLFkfr STATE OF HOUSING IN INDIA A STATISTICAL COMPENDIUM 2013 Government of India Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation National Buildings Organisation 1 LIST OF TABLES 1 Total Number of Census Houses: Rural & Urban-2011. 2 Total Number of Households: Rural & Urban -2011. 3 Distribution of Occupied Census Houses -2011. 4 Distribution of Census Houses by Predominant Material of Roof -2011. 5 Distribution of Census Houses by Predominant Material of Wall -2011. 6 Distribution of Census Houses by Predominant Material of Floor-2011. Distribution of Occupied Houses used as Residence and Residence- cum -Other Uses by their 7 Habitable Condition -2011. 8 Distribution of Households Living in Census Houses by Predominant Material of Roof -2011. 9 Distribution of Households Living in Census Houses by Predominant Material of Wall -2011. 10 Distribution of Households Living in Census Houses by Predominant Material of Floor -2011. 11 Distribution of Households by Their Habitable Condition of Census Houses Occupied -2011. 12 Distribution of Households Having Number of Dwelling Rooms -2011. 13 Distribution of Households by Ownership Status of the Census Houses Occupied by them -2011. 14 Distribution of Households by Number of Married Couples in a Household- 2011. 15 Distribution of Households by Source of Drinking Water -2011. 16 Distribution of Households by Location of Drinking Water Source -2011. 17 Distribution of Households by Availability of Kitchen Facility -2011. 18 Distribution of Households by Type of Bathing Facility Within the House -2011. Distribution of Households by Type of Drainage connectivity for Waste Water Outlet Facility 19 Within the House -2011. 20 Distribution of Households by Type of Latrine Facility Within the House -2011. 21 Distribution of Households by Source of Lighting Facility-2011. 22 Distribution of Households by Availability of Type of Fuel Used for Cooking- 2011. 23 Distribution of Households by Availing of Banking Services Facility- 2011. i 24 'LVWULEXWLRQRI+RXVHKROGVKDYLQJHDFKRIWKH6SHFL¿HG$VVHWV 25 Distribution of Houseless Population in India – 2001. 26 Distribution of Estimated Urban Housing Shortage in India – 2012-17. 27 Distribution of State-wise Urban Housing Shortage (2012-17) 28 Distribution of Urban Housing Shortage among different Socio-Economic Groups (2012-17) Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Major Source (Most Used) of Drinking Water during 29 Last 365 Days as per 49th, 58th and 65th NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Distance from Source of Drinking Water as per 49th 30 , 58th and 65th NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Type of Bathroom Facility in 49th, 58th and 65th 31 NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Type of Latrine Used as per 49th, 58th, and 65th 32 NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Type of Use of Latrine Facility as per 49th, 58th, and 33 65th NSSO Rounds. Proportion (in Percentage) of Households with Electricity for Domestic Use as per 49th, 58th, and 34 65th NSSO Rounds. Proportion (in Percentage) of Households with Drinking Water Within Premises, Electricity for 35 Domestic Use and Latrine During 49th, 58th and 65th NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households with Different Types of Tenurial Status of the Dwelling 36 Unit During 49th, 58th and 65th NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in percentage) of Households by Type of Structure of House as per 49th, 58th, and 65th 37 NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households Living in Houses by Type of Use of House: as per 49th, 38 58th, and 65th NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households Living in Houses by Condition of Structure: NSSO 65th 39 Round. Proportion of Households (in Percentage) who undertook Construction during Last 365 Days, 40 Average Number of Constructions undertaken Per Reporting Households during Last 365 Days and Average Cost Per Construction in NSS 65th Round. Distribution (in Percentage) of Average Cost of Construction during the Last 365 Days for 41 Different Items in 65th Round. 42 Distribution (Per 1000) of Households across Social Groups during 2008-09: NSSO 65th Round. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Major Source (Most Used) of Drinking Water 43 During Last 365 Days in 65th Round. ii Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Availability of Types of Bathroom for Each Social 44 Group: NSSO 65th Round. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Availability of Latrine Facility for Different Social 45 Groups: NSSO 65th Round. Proportion (in Percentage) of Households by Social Groups Who had Electricity for Domestic Use: 46 NSSO 65th Round. 47 3RSXODWLRQ 6OXP3RSXODWLRQ3UR¿OHRI,QGLD 48 Slum Population in Million Plus Cities in India-2001 49 India’s Estimated Slum Population for all 5161 towns in 2001. 50 State wise estimated slum population for all 5161 towns 2001 51 India’s projected slum population during Year 2011-2017. 52 Statewise projected slum population during 2011-2017 53 Urban Sector: Major Thrust Areas and Programmes in Five Year Plans. 54 Cumulative Physical and Financial Progress under JNNURM (BSUP & IHSDP) (Rs in Crores) 55 Swarna Jayanti Shahari Rozgar Yojana: Physical and Financial Progress (Rs in Crores) iii LIST OF FIGURES 1 Total Number of Census House - Census-2011. 2 Total Number of Households: Rural & Urban -2011. 3 Total Number of Occupied Census Houses -2011. 4 Census Houses by Predominant Material of Roof -2011. 5 Census Houses by Predominant Material of Wall-2011. 6 Census Houses by Predominant Material of Floor-2011. 7 Occupied Census Houses by Their habitable Condition-2011. 8 Households Living in Census Houses by Predominant Material of Roof -2011. 9 Households Living in Census Houses by Predominant Material of Wall -2011. 10 Households Living in Census Houses by Predominant Material of Floor -2011. 11 Households by Their Habitable Condition of Census Houses Occupied -2011. 12 Households Having Number of Dwelling Rooms -2011. 13 Households by Ownership Status of the Census Houses Occupied by Them -2011. 14 Households by Number of Married Couples in Households -2011. 15 Households by Source of Drinking Water -2011. 16 Households by Location of Drinking Water Source -2011. 17 Households by Availability of Kitchen Facility-2011. 18 Households by Type of Bathing Facility Within the House -2011. Households by Type of Drainage connectivity for Waste Water Outlet Facility Within the House 19 -2011. 20 Households by Type of Latrine Facility Within the House -2011. 21 Households by Source of Lighting Facility -2011. 22 Households by Availability of Type of Fuel Used for Cooking - 2011 23 Distribution of Households by Availing of Banking Services Facility- 2011. 24 +RXVHKROGV+DYLQJHDFKRIWKH6SHFL¿HG$VVHWV 25 Houseless Population in India – 2001. 26 Estimated Urban Housing Shortage in India – 2012-17. 27 State-wise Urban Housing Shortage (2012-17) 28 Urban Housing Shortage among different Socio- Economic Groups in India- 2012-17. iv Percentage Distribution of Households by Different Sources of Drinking Water in NSSO 65th 29 Round for Rural +Urban. Percentage Distribution of Households by Distance From Source of Drinking Water as per 49th, 30 58th and 65th NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in percentage) of Households by Type of Bathroom Facility in 49th, 58th and 65th 31 NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Type of Latrine for Rural + Urban during 49th, 58th 32 and 65th NSSO Rounds. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Type of Use of Latrine Facility in 49th, 58th and 33 65th NSSO Rounds. Proportion (in Percentage) of Households with Electricity for Domestic Use during 49th, 58th and 34 65th Rounds. Proportion (in Percentage) of Households with Drinking Water Within Premises, Electricity for 35 Domestic Use and Latrine (All- India Level) during 49th, 58th and 65th Rounds. 36 Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Type of Structure of House in NSSO 65th Round. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households Living in Houses by Type of Use of House in NSSO 37 65th Round. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households Living in Houses by Condition of Structure: NSSO 38 65th Round. Proportion of Households (in Percentage) in Rural, Urban and Rural +Urban Areas Who had 39 undertaken Construction during Last 365 Days by Status of Construction in NSSO 65th Round. 40 Average Cost (Rs. 000) per Construction: NSSO 65th Round. Distribution (in Percentage) of Average Cost of Construction During the Last 365 Days in 41 Different Items in NSSO 65th Round. Distribution (Per 1000) of Households and Percentage Across Social Groups During 2008-09: 42 NSSO 65th Round. Distribution (in Percentage) of Households by Availability of Types of Bathroom for Each Social 43 Group: NSSO 65th Round. Proportion (in Percentage) of Households by Social Groups Who had Electricity for Domestic 44 Use: NSSO 65th Round. 45 Slum and Non Slum Population in India-2001. 46 Percentage of Slum and Non Slum Population in India-2001. 47 State wise Number of Slum Reporting Towns/Cities in India-2001. 48 State/UT wise Slum Population as per Census 2001. 49 Percentage Distribution of Slum Population in States/UT’s as per Census 2001. 50 Slum Population in Major Million Plus Cities per Census 2001. 51 India’s estimated slum population for all 5161 towns in 2001 52 India’s projected slum population during 2011-2017 53 State wise Projected slum population by 2017 v LIST OF BOXES 1 12th Plan: Objective for Urban Poverty Alleviation.
Recommended publications
  • Toward a Better Appraisal of Urbanization in India: a Fresh Look at the Landscape of Morphological Agglomerates Eric Denis, Kamala Marius-Gnanou

    Toward a Better Appraisal of Urbanization in India: a Fresh Look at the Landscape of Morphological Agglomerates Eric Denis, Kamala Marius-Gnanou

    Toward a better appraisal of urbanization in India: A fresh look at the landscape of morphological agglomerates Eric Denis, Kamala Marius-Gnanou To cite this version: Eric Denis, Kamala Marius-Gnanou. Toward a better appraisal of urbanization in India: A fresh look at the landscape of morphological agglomerates. 2011. hal-00610218 HAL Id: hal-00610218 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00610218 Preprint submitted on 21 Jul 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. W o r k i n g P a p e r s 2 S e r i e s USR 3330 “Savoirs et Mondes Indiens” TOWARD A BETTER APPRAISAL OF URBANIZATION IN INDIA A fresh look at the landscape of morphological agglomerates Eric DENIS* and Kamala MARIUS-GNANOU† Institut Français de Pondichéry* and ADES, Bordeaux University† 2011 C S H IfP UMIFRE 21 CNRS-MAEE UMIFRE 20 CNRS-MAEE Institut Français de pondichéry Centre de Sciences Humaines Pondicherry New Delhi TOWARD A BETTER APPRAISAL OF URBANIZATION IN INDIA A fresh look at the landscape of morphological agglomerates Eric DENIS, IFP, [email protected] Kamala MARIUS-GNANOU, ADES, Bordeaux University, [email protected] Abstract: Up to now, studies of urbanization in India have been based only on official urban figures as provided by the Census Surveys.
  • A Situational Analysis of Women and Girls in Kerala

    A Situational Analysis of Women and Girls in Kerala

    1. INTRODUCTION All measurements of human development have put Kerala on top of all the major States of India. The Planning Commission of India has worked out the Human Development Index (HDI) at 0.638 for Kerala against 0.472 for All India, for the year 20011 . Kerala has the highest life Table 1.1 Domestic Product and Per Capita Income, Kerala/India expectancy, literacy and lowest infant (Rs. crore) mortality, though per capita monthly ITEM KERALA INDIA expenditure is not the highest. 2000-01 2001-02 2000-01 2001-02 In terms of Net Domestic Product, Net Domestic Product (NDP) At current prices 63,094 69,602 17,19,868 18,76,955 Keralas rank amongst States falls in the (10.8) (10.3) (8.9) (9.1) middle, though it holds the highest HDI At 1993-94 prices 34,450 36,079 10,62,616 11,23,543 rank. Per capita income of Kerala at (5.3) (4.7) (4.2) (5.7) Per Capita Income constant prices in 2001-02 was Rs. 11,046 At current prices 19,463 21310 16,707 17,978 crore. It was marginally higher than the (9.9) (9.5) (6.9) (7.6) per capita income for India (Rs.10,754 At 1993-94 prices 10,627 11046 10,306 10,754 (4.4) (3.9) (2.4) (4.3) crore). But the rate of growth in Kerala Source: Government of Kerala, State Planning Board, during this year was lesser than for India. Economic Review, 2002 Figures in brackets indicate change over the previous year.
  • Yojana and Kurukshetra- September 2017

    Yojana and Kurukshetra- September 2017

    Yojana and Kurukshetra- September 2017 www.iasbaba.com Page | 1 Yojana and Kurukshetra- September 2017 Preface This is our 30th edition of Yojana Gist and 21st edition of Kurukshetra Gist, released for the month of September, 2017. It is increasingly finding a place in the questions of both UPSC Prelims and Mains and therefore, we’ve come up with this initiative to equip you with knowledge that’ll help you in your preparation for the CSE. Every Issue deals with a single topic comprehensively sharing views from a wide spectrum ranging from academicians to policy makers to scholars. The magazine is essential to build an in-depth understanding of various socio-economic issues. From the exam point of view, however, not all articles are important. Some go into scholarly depths and others discuss agendas that are not relevant for your preparation. Added to this is the difficulty of going through a large volume of information, facts and analysis to finally extract their essence that may be useful for the exam. We are not discouraging from reading the magazine itself. So, do not take this as a document which you take read, remember and reproduce in the examination. Its only purpose is to equip you with the right understanding. But, if you do not have enough time to go through the magazines, you can rely on the content provided here for it sums up the most essential points from all the articles. You need not put hours and hours in reading and making its notes in pages. We believe, a smart study, rather than hard study, can improve your preparation levels.
  • A Socioeconomic and Educational Conditions of Koragas (With Reference of 100 Selected Families of Koragas in and Around Kundapura in Udupi District)

    A Socioeconomic and Educational Conditions of Koragas (With Reference of 100 Selected Families of Koragas in and Around Kundapura in Udupi District)

    www.ijcrt.org © 2020 IJCRT | Volume 8, Issue 9 September 2020 | ISSN: 2320-2882 A Socioeconomic and Educational conditions of Koragas (With reference of 100 selected families of Koragas in and around Kundapura in Udupi District) 1Ramachandra, 2DR. GANGADHARA DAIVAJNA 1Assistant Professor, 2ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR 1Bhandarkars Arts & Science College, Kundpaura-576201, 2TRIBAL STUDY CENTRE KANNADA UNIVERSITY - HAMPI ABSTRACT: The Koraga tribe is a primitive tribe or to say is one the oldest tribe of the region is found mainly on such regions on the part of Dakshina Kannada and Udupi districts of Karnataka and the Kasaragod district of Kerala, south India. These areas in Karnataka, are altogether often referred to as Tulu Nadu. They are also found in small numbers in adjoining districts of Uttara Kannada, Shimoga and Kodagu. The Koraga are classified by the Government of India as a Scheduled Tribe. The Koraga, who numbered 16,071 according to the 2001 census of India, have their own language, classified as an independent Dravidian language, which is strongly influenced by Tulu, Kannada, Malayalam, languages commonly found in their area. Tribal community is an integral part of Indian society. India has the second largest tribal population in the world next to Africa. Tribal population add upto 8.6% of the total population of the nation as per 2011 census. It means their population is more than 20 crores. In Karnataka we have 50 Tribal communities especially Soligas, Gondas, Valmikies, Jenu kurubas, Hakkipikkies, Marathi, Malekudiyas, Kadukurubas, Kammaras, Meda, Todas and others. The Jenukurubas and Koragas are considered as Primitive, vulnerable or aboriginal tribes of the regions.
  • Report of the Steering Committee on Urban Development for Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012)

    Report of the Steering Committee on Urban Development for Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012)

    Draft REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR ELEVENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2007-2012) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Planning Commission New Delhi 1 Draft REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR ELEVENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2007-2012) CHAPTER 1 IINTRODUCTION Urbanization is an indicator of economic development. Urban agglomerations afford economies of scale in both manufacturing and services activities and also in provision of infrastructure services. Urbanization should be seen as a positive factor for overall development. This is manifested in the increasing contribution of urban sector to the national economy. For instance, in 1950-51, the contribution of urban sector to India’s GDP was only 29%, which increased to 47% in 1980-81 and presently it is contributing 62%-63% and is likely to be 75% by 2021. 1.1 National and urban scenario and the global context India’s total population increased about 2.8 times between 1951 and 2001, but the urban population rose about 4.6 times during the same period. The decadal growth rate in urban population has been more than 30% during 1971-2001. Index of urban population has been continuously growing up with an increasing trend since 1951. There has been a remarkable increase in urban population during 1991-2001, which can be attributed to the economic reforms initiated in the year 1991. Notwithstanding, the difference in definitions of constituents of urban areas in various countries, the degree of urbanization in India is amongst the lowest in the world. As per United Nations estimates, 47 per cent of total population of the world lived in urban areas in 2000.
  • Journal16-2.Pdf

    Journal16-2.Pdf

    Institute of Town Planners, India Journal 16 x 2, April - June 2019 ISSN : 0537 - 9679 Editorial This issue contains six papers. The first paper is on “Affordable Housing Provision in the Context of Kolkata Metropolitan Area’’, and is authored by Joy Karmakar who highlights Government of India’s mission of affordable housing for all citizens by 2022. He argues that the mission has become a major talking point for the people including policy makers to private developers to scholars at different levels. The idea of affordability and affordable housing has been defined by various organizations over the years but no unanimous definition has emerged. The need for affordable housing in the urban area is not new to India and especially mega cities like Kolkata. The paper revisits and assesses the affordable housing provision in Kolkata Metropolitan Area and how the idea of affordable housing provision has evolved over the years. It becomes clear from the analysis that the role of the state in providing affordable housing to urban poor has not only been reduced but shifted to the middle class. The second paper titled “Property Tax: Role of Technology in Process Improvement, Transparency and Revenue Enhancement’’ is written by Dinesh Ahlawat, Saurav Sen and Akshat Jain, discusses property tax reforms with a focus on current assessment, collection and record keeping of property tax data in the ULBs and how these issues can be resolved with the adoption of streamlined processes and use of technology. The author explains that property tax is evaluated differently for different properties. Presently, the traditional methods for tax assessment are causing delays in the process, a large number of unassessed properties remain, and several properties are not assessed correctly due to dependency on manual efforts.
  • Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

    Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

    Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of... https://irb-cisr.gc.ca/en/country-information/rir/Pages/index.aspx?doc=4... Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada India: Treatment of Dalits by society and authorities; availability of state protection (2016- January 2020) 1. Overview According to sources, the term Dalit means "'broken'" or "'oppressed'" (Dalit Solidarity n.d.a; MRG n.d.; Navsarjan Trust n.d.a). Sources indicate that this group was formerly referred to as "'untouchables'" (Dalit Solidarity n.d.a; MRG n.d.; Navsarjan Trust n.d.a). They are referred to officially as "Scheduled Castes" (India 13 July 2006, 1; MRG n.d.; Navsarjan Trust n.d.a). The Indian National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) identified that Scheduled Castes are communities that "were suffering from extreme social, educational and economic backwardness arising out of [the] age-old practice of untouchability" (India 13 July 2006, 1). The Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) [1] indicates that the list of groups officially recognized as Scheduled Castes, which can be modified by the Parliament, varies from one state to another, and can even vary among districts within a state (CHRI 2018, 15). According to the 2011 Census of India [the most recent census (World Population Review [2019])], the Scheduled Castes represent 16.6 percent of the total Indian population, or 201,378,086 persons, of which 76.4 percent are in rural areas (India 2011). The census further indicates that the Scheduled Castes constitute 18.5 percent of the total rural population, and 12.6 percent of the total urban population in India (India 2011).
  • Chapter 3 Urban Housing and Exclusion

    Chapter 3 Urban Housing and Exclusion

    Chapter 3 Urban Housing and Exclusion © Florian Lang/ActionAid Gautam Bhan ● Geetika Anand Amogh Arakali ● Anushree Deb Swastik Harish 77 India Exclusion Report 2013-14 1. Introduction In different ways, however, these contrasting imaginations of housing eventually see it as an Housing is many things to many people. The asset to be accessed, consumed and used, be it by National Urban Housing and Habitat Policy (2007) households or developers, for use or exchange. sees housing and shelter as ‘basic human needs Housing is, in other words, an end unto itself. 1 next to only food or clothing’, putting makaan in However, housing is not just what it is but what it its familiar place beside roti and kapda. The United does. Declaring affordable housing to be a sector Nations agrees, speaking of the ‘right to adequate marked for priority lending, the Reserve Bank of housing as a human right owever, the ualifer— India spoke not just of access to housing but of the ‘adequate’—begins to push at the boundaries of what ‘employment generation potential of these sectors’.4 is meant when talking about ‘housing’. Adequacy Similarly, for the National Housing Bank, housing here includes a litany of elements: ‘(a) legal security is a basic need but also ‘a valuable collateral that of tenure; (b) availability of services, materials, can enable the access of credit from the fnancial facilities and infrastructure; (c) affordability; (d) market’.5 Others argue that housing is a vector habitability; (e) accessibility; (f) location; and to other developmental capabilities. Without it, 2 (g) cultural adequacy’. In the move from ‘house’ health, education, psycho-social development, to ‘housing’, the materiality of the dwelling unit cultural assimilation, belonging, and economic expands to include legal status, infrastructure, development are impossible.
  • Minority Languages in India

    Minority Languages in India

    Thomas Benedikter Minority Languages in India An appraisal of the linguistic rights of minorities in India ---------------------------- EURASIA-Net Europe-South Asia Exchange on Supranational (Regional) Policies and Instruments for the Promotion of Human Rights and the Management of Minority Issues 2 Linguistic minorities in India An appraisal of the linguistic rights of minorities in India Bozen/Bolzano, March 2013 This study was originally written for the European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen (EURAC), Institute for Minority Rights, in the frame of the project Europe-South Asia Exchange on Supranational (Regional) Policies and Instruments for the Promotion of Human Rights and the Management of Minority Issues (EURASIA-Net). The publication is based on extensive research in eight Indian States, with the support of the European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano and the Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group, Kolkata. EURASIA-Net Partners Accademia Europea Bolzano/Europäische Akademie Bozen (EURAC) – Bolzano/Bozen (Italy) Brunel University – West London (UK) Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität – Frankfurt am Main (Germany) Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group (India) South Asian Forum for Human Rights (Nepal) Democratic Commission of Human Development (Pakistan), and University of Dhaka (Bangladesh) Edited by © Thomas Benedikter 2013 Rights and permissions Copying and/or transmitting parts of this work without prior permission, may be a violation of applicable law. The publishers encourage dissemination of this publication and would be happy to grant permission.
  • RURAL URBAN DISTRIBUTION of POPULATION (Provisional Population Totals)

    RURAL URBAN DISTRIBUTION of POPULATION (Provisional Population Totals)

    Census of India 2011 RURAL URBAN DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION (Provisional Population Totals) Our Census, Our Future DR C. CHANDRAMOULI REGISTRAR GENERAL & CENSUS COMMISSIONER, INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI : 15th July 2011. Census of India 2011 • Census 2011 is the 15th Census of India since 1872 • Census 2011 was held in two phases: • Houselisting & Housing Census (April to September 2010) • Population Enumeration (9th to 28th February 2011) • Reference Date: 0:00 Hours of 1st March 2011 • In Snow Bound areas the Population Enumeration was conducted from 11th to 30th September 2010 • Reference Date: 0:00 Hours of 1st October 2010 2 Census of India 2011 Agenda • Release of Provisional Population Totals - Rural Urban Distribution • Launch of Census 2011 Dashboard 3 What is Provisional Population? • Provisional Population is arrived at by adding the Population as reported by each Enumerator for the Enumeration Block assigned to her/him • There could be errors in addition or there could be cases of omission/ duplication of Enumeration Blocks • The Final Population will be released next year after scanning of Census Schedules, data capture by using ICR technology and processing is completed. 4 Population (in Crore) 2001 2011 Difference India 102.9 121.0 18.1 Rural 74.3 83.3 9.0 Urban 28.6 37.7 9.1 • For the first time since Independence, the absolute increase in population is more in urban areas that in rural areas • Rural – Urban distribution: 68.84% & 31.16% • Level of urbanization increased from 27.81% in 2001 Census to 31.16% in 2011 Census • The proportion of rural population declined from 72.19% to 68.84% Growth Rate of Population (in %) 1991-2001 2001-2011 Difference India 21.5 17.6 -3.9 Rural 18.1 12.2 -5.9 Urban 31.5 31.8 +0.3 The slowing down of the overall growth rate of population is due to the sharp decline in the growth rate in rural areas, while the growth rate in urban areas remains almost the same.
  • Sustainable Social Housing in India

    Sustainable Social Housing in India

    Sustainable Social Housing in India Definition, Challenges and Opportunities Technical Report Gregor Herda, Sonia Rani, Pratibha Ruth Caleb, Rajat Gupta, Megha Behal, Matt Gregg, Srijani Hazra May 2017 MaS-SHIP Mainstreaming Sustainable Social Housing in India Project i | P a g e MaS-SHIP (Mainstreaming Sustainable Social Housing in India project) is an initiative by the Low- Carbon Building Group at Oxford Brookes University, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Development Alternatives and UN-Habitat, that seeks to promote sustainability in terms of environmental performance, affordability and social inclusion as an integrated part of social housing in India. MaS-SHIP is supported by the Sustainable Buildings and Construction Programme of the 10- Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production (10-YFP). This report should be referenced as: Herda, G., Rani, S., Caleb, P. R., Gupta, R., Behal, M., Gregg, M. and Hazra, S. (2017). Sustainable social housing in India: definition, challenges and opportunities - Technical Report, Oxford Brookes University, Development Alternatives, The Energy and Resources Institute and UN-Habitat. Oxford. ISBN: 978-0-9929299-8 Technical peer reviewers: Professor Amita Bhide, Tata Institute of Social Sciences Dr Sameer Maithel, Greentech Knowledge Solutions Professor B V Venkatarama Reddy, Indian Institute of Science For more information on the MaS-SHIP project, please visit; www.mainstreamingsustainablehousing.org Or contact Professor Rajat Gupta: [email protected] Published by: Low Carbon Building Group, Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development, Oxford Brookes University © Oxford Brookes University, Development Alternatives, The Energy and Resources Institute and UN-Habitat, 2017 Images front and back cover: MaS-SHIP team The MaS-SHIP research team wishes to encourage access to, and circulation of, its work as widely as possible without affecting the ownership of the copyright, which remains with the copyright holder.
  • THE LANGUAGES of MANIPUR: a CASE STUDY of the KUKI-CHIN LANGUAGES* Pauthang Haokip Department of Linguistics, Assam University, Silchar

    THE LANGUAGES of MANIPUR: a CASE STUDY of the KUKI-CHIN LANGUAGES* Pauthang Haokip Department of Linguistics, Assam University, Silchar

    Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area Volume 34.1 — April 2011 THE LANGUAGES OF MANIPUR: A CASE STUDY OF THE KUKI-CHIN LANGUAGES* Pauthang Haokip Department of Linguistics, Assam University, Silchar Abstract: Manipur is primarily the home of various speakers of Tibeto-Burman languages. Aside from the Tibeto-Burman speakers, there are substantial numbers of Indo-Aryan and Dravidian speakers in different parts of the state who have come here either as traders or as workers. Keeping in view the lack of proper information on the languages of Manipur, this paper presents a brief outline of the languages spoken in the state of Manipur in general and Kuki-Chin languages in particular. The social relationships which different linguistic groups enter into with one another are often political in nature and are seldom based on genetic relationship. Thus, Manipur presents an intriguing area of research in that a researcher can end up making wrong conclusions about the relationships among the various linguistic groups, unless one thoroughly understands which groups of languages are genetically related and distinct from other social or political groupings. To dispel such misconstrued notions which can at times mislead researchers in the study of the languages, this paper provides an insight into the factors linguists must take into consideration before working in Manipur. The data on Kuki-Chin languages are primarily based on my own information as a resident of Churachandpur district, which is further supported by field work conducted in Churachandpur district during the period of 2003-2005 while I was working for the Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore, as a research investigator.