DOCSLIB.ORG

FW 662 – Density-Dependent Population Models in the Previous

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FW 662 – Density-Dependent Population Models in the Previous FW 662 – Density-dependent population models In the previous lecture we considered density independent population models that assumed that birth and death rates were constant and not a function of population size. Long-term density independent population growth is unlikely and an unrealistic assumption. Birth and death rates are more likely a function of population density or abundance. Density Dependence births are a decreasing function of density b(N) and deaths are an increasing function of density d(N). births deaths d b or N This results in population growth being a declining function of N ) N ( th (f w o r G on ti a l pu o P N Hence population growth will be zero at some population size. This point is usually referred to as K (or carrying capacity) but let’s develop the model first considering the explicit functions for birth and death. The approach is described in Donovan and Weldon (2002) but I have modified it to match the notation in Gotelli (1998). FW 662 – Density-dependent population models We need two new terms to account for changes in per capita birth and death rates a= the amount by which the per capita birth rate changes in response to an addition of one individual to the population. c= ditto for death rate… Our density independent discrete model was a difference equation expressed as: N t+1 = N t + bN t − dN t We replace b and d (the density independent birth rate and death rate) with: b − aN t and d + cN t Now our new density dependent model looks like N t+1 = N t + ()b − aN t N t − (d + cN t )N t Population growth rate is not easy to visualize from this equation. But you can see that initially the population will grow geometrically because N(t) is small but as N(t) grows a and c have a greater influence on the population. The question is will the population decrease in size? Increase? Or stabilize??? Use a common tactic and assume that there is an equilibrium (i.e. a point where the population size isn’t changing). N t = N t+1 = N eq N eq = N eq + (b − aN eq )N eq − (d + cN eq )N eq Subtract N(eq) from both sides and add (d + cN eq )N eq (b − aN eq )N eq = (d + cN eq )N eq Divide by N(eq) (b − aN eq ) = (d + cN eq ) This tells us that the population is at equilibrium when per capita birth and death rates are equal. THIS MAKES SENSE. FW 662 – Density-dependent population models Now we can solve the equation for N(eq) Rearrange the equation by subtracting d and adding aN b − d = cN eq + aN eq Factor out N(eq) b − d = ()a + c N eq Divide by (a+c) b − d = N = K a + c eq Using this equation you can calculate K, if you know b, d, and the two factors that account for density dependence. Density Dependence (discrete logistic) Typically, K is specified and not calculated from the birth and death rates. Let’s start with our geometric model ∆N t = RN t The existence of a carrying capacity (K) suggests that the population cannot exceed this level. ⎛ N t ⎞ ∆N t = RN t ⎜1− ⎟ ⎝ K ⎠ ⎛ N t ⎞ N t+1 − N t = RN t ⎜1− ⎟ ⎝ K ⎠ ⎛ N t ⎞ N t+1 = N t + RN t ⎜1− ⎟ ⎝ K ⎠ FW 662 – Density-dependent population models The logistic model results in the following population dynamics. When N(t) is small then geometric growth and when N(t)=K then population growth is zero. Pop Siz e 60 50 40 N 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time We can also look at the change in population size as a function of population size. Initially the population is growing quickly but then decline to zero. Delta N( t) 10 8 N 6 a t Del 4 2 0 0204060 N Looking at the per capita rate of change, the population begins growing at R and declines to zero at K. From this graph you can see that the density dependence is linear. (DeltaN(t))/N(t) 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0204060 N FW 662 – Density-dependent population models Density Dependence (continuous logistic) dN ⎛ K − N ⎞ = rN⎜ ⎟ dt ⎝ K ⎠ This equation predicts the rate of change in population size and you need to derive a predictive equation. WHICH IS K N t = ⎡()K − N 0 ⎤ −rt 1+ ⎢ ⎥e ⎣ N 0 ⎦ This model results in the same dynamics that were demonstrated for the discrete version of the model. However, the discrete version of the model is capable of demonstrating a wider variety of dynamics than the continuous version, which we will explore later. We have derived two predictive equations for exponential population growth and two equations for density dependent population growth. Discrete Continuous rt Density Independent t N N e Nt = λ N0 t = 0 K N = K − N t ⎛ t ⎞ ⎡ ⎤ Density Dependent N t+1 = N t + RN t ⎜ ⎟ ()K − N0 −rt ⎝ K ⎠ 1+ ⎢ ⎥e ⎣ N0 ⎦ FW 662 – Density-dependent population models Other models with Density Dependence PLEASE PRINT AND READ GARY’S LECTURE NOTES (5-7) Many possibilities exist for describing density dependence and there are several other models that have been developed. The Ricker equation Ricker was a fishery biologist interested in predicting recruitment to fishery stocks and developed the following density dependent equation. Note that density dependence in this equation is not linear and becomes stronger at higher densities (due to the exponential function). ⎛ Nt ⎞ R0 ⎜1− ⎟ ⎝ K ⎠ Nt +1 = Nte The Hassel Equation KN (R +1) N = t 0 t+1 K + Nt R0 FW 662 – Density-dependent population models Comparing population growth among the logistic, Ricker, and Hassel models for R=0.75 and K=100. 120 100 80 Logistic (t) 60 N Ricker 40 Hassel 20 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (t) Comparing the form of density dependence among the logistic, Ricker, and Hassel models. 1.2 Logistic 1 ) t Ricker ( N 0.8 Hassel (t) / 0.6 N a t l 0.4 e d 0.2 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 N(t) Comparing the per capita growth rate among the logistic, Ricker, and Hassel models 25 Logistic 20 Ricker Hassel (t) 15 N a t l e 10 d 5 0 0 20406080100120 N(t) FW 662 – Density-dependent population models Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) I will develop a model based on the logistic difference (discrete) equation and follow ther derivation in Williams et al (2002). Start with our discrete logistic difference equation ⎛ N t ⎞ N t+1 = N t + RN t ⎜1− ⎟ ⎝ K ⎠ and include a term for total Harvest H(t) ⎛ N t ⎞ N t+1 = N t + RN t ⎜1− ⎟ − H t ⎝ K ⎠ The population is at equilibrium (N(t+1)=N(t)) when ⎛ N t ⎞ RN t ⎜1− ⎟ = H t ⎝ K ⎠ and the per capita harvest rate h H t ht = N t ⎛ N t ⎞ ht = R⎜1− ⎟ ⎝ K ⎠ A given per capita harvest rate h(t) corresponds to a specific equilibrium population size that can sustain it and can be seen by rearranging the above equation in terms of N. ⎛ h ⎞ N = K⎜1− ⎟ ⎝ R ⎠ This equation indicates that the population can be sustained in equilibrium for any value h that is less that the population growth rate R. The question is, “What value corresponds to the largest sustainable harvest?” dH = R − 2R()N dN K FW 662 – Density-dependent population models Set this equal to 0 and solve for N, which results in N ∗ = K 2 Substituting into our equation for equilibrium harvest: ∗ ∗ ⎛ N ⎞ ∗ RN ⎜1− ⎟ = H ⎝ K ⎠ R N ∗ = H ∗ ( 2) RK = H ∗ ( 4) Then the per capita harvest (h) is ∗ h∗ = H N ∗ h∗ = R 2 FW 662 – Density-dependent population models MSY 14 12 ) t 10 N( 8 a t 6 Del 4 2 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 N(t ) MSY 0.11 ) 0.1 t ( 0.09 N 0.08 0.07 t))/ ( 0.06 N 0.05 ta 0.04 l e 0.03 0.02 (d 0.01 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 N(t) FW 662 – Density-dependent population models Gotelli, N. 1998. A primer of ecology. Sinauer Associates Inc. New York. Hassel, M.P. Density-dependence in single-species populations. The Journal of Animal Ecology. 44:283-295. Ricker, W. E. 1954. Stock and recruitment. Journal Fisheries Research Board of Canada 11:624-651. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 191. Ottawa, Canada. Williams, B.K., J.D. Nichols, M.J. Conroy. 2002. Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic Press. New York. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Population, Consumption & the Environment
    12/11/2009 Population, Consumption & the Environment Alex de Sherbinin Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), the Earth Institute at Columbia University Population-Environment Research Network 2 1 12/11/2009 Why is this important? • Global GDP is 20 times higher today than it was in 1900, having grown at a rate of 2.7% per annum (population grew at the rate of 13%1.3% p.a.) • CO2 emissions have grown at an annual rate of 3.5% since 1900, reaching 100 million metric tons of carbon in 2001 • The ecological footprint, a composite measure of consumption measured in hectares of biologically productive land, grew from 4.5 to 14.1 billion hectares between 1961 and 2003, and it is now 25% more than Earth’s “biocapacity ” • For CO2 emissions and footprints, the per capita impacts of high‐income countries are currently 6 to 10 times higher than those in low‐income countries 3 Outline 1. What kind of consumption is bad for the environment? 2. How are population dynamics and consumption linked? 3. Who is responsible for environmentally damaging consumption? 4. What contributions can demographers make to the understanding of consumption? 5. Conclusion: The challenge of “sustainable consumption” 4 2 12/11/2009 What kind of consumption is bad for the environment? SECTION 2 5 What kind of consumption is bad? “[Consumption is] human transformations of materials and energy. [It] is environmentally important to the extent that it makes materials or energy less available for future use, and … through its effects on biophysical systems, threatens hhlthlfththill”human health, welfare, or other things people value.” - Stern, 1997 • Early focus on “wasteful consumption”, conspicuous consumption, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Infectious Diseases: a Review of the Linkages
    TDR/STR/SEB/ST/04.2 SPECIAL TOPICS NO.3 Globalization and infectious diseases: A review of the linkages Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research & Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) The "Special Topics in Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research" series are peer-reviewed publications commissioned by the TDR Steering Committee for Social, Economic and Behavioural Research. For further information please contact: Dr Johannes Sommerfeld Manager Steering Committee for Social, Economic and Behavioural Research (SEB) UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) World Health Organization 20, Avenue Appia CH-1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] TDR/STR/SEB/ST/04.2 Globalization and infectious diseases: A review of the linkages Lance Saker,1 MSc MRCP Kelley Lee,1 MPA, MA, D.Phil. Barbara Cannito,1 MSc Anna Gilmore,2 MBBS, DTM&H, MSc, MFPHM Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum,1 D.Phil. 1 Centre on Global Change and Health London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK 2 European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST) London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK TDR/STR/SEB/ST/04.2 Copyright © World Health Organization on behalf of the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases 2004 All rights reserved. The use of content from this health information product for all non-commercial education, training and information purposes is encouraged, including translation, quotation and reproduction, in any medium, but the content must not be changed and full acknowledgement of the source must be clearly stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Litter Pollution in Densely Versus Sparsely Populated Areas: Dog River Watershed
    LITTER POLLUTION IN DENSELY VERSUS SPARSELY POPULATED AREAS: DOG RIVER WATERSHED Gabrielle M. Hudson, Department of Earth Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688. E-mail: [email protected]. It is commonly known that when humans populate an area that area is usually subject to some environmental degradation. One of the more common aspects of environmental degradation is litter. This type of degradation is no stranger to the Dog River watershed. For years residents have seen the rivers in this watershed covered in trash, specifically after rain events. The vast majority of the trash is a result of litter from roadsides being carried into the river via drainage pipes. This paper is a comparative study of litter in areas of varying population densities in the Dog River watershed. It seeks to distinguish between the amount of litter found in densely populated areas and sparsely populated areas, and to find out if there is a correlation between population density and litter. I utilize GIS to map population density of the Dog River watershed, and analyze and compare the amounts of litter in areas of sparse and dense populations. The results show that there is no correlation between population density and litter. It also shows that there is no difference in the amounts of litter found in densely and sparsely populated areas. Keyword: litter, population density, watershed Introduction Pollution has long been an issue in the Dog River watershed, in particular litter pollution. The extent of the pollution has not gone unnoticed. There are groups of people and organizations who have taken increased interest in the Dog River watershed with intentions of reducing pollution, including Dog River Clearwater Revival and its numerous volunteers.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 Biogeography and Dispersal
    Chapter 15 Biogeography and dispersal Rob Hengeveld and Lia Hemerik Introduction This chapter evaluates the role of dispersal in biogeographical processes and their re- sulting patterns. We consider dispersal as a local process, which comprises the com- bined movements of individual organisms, but which can dominate processes even at the scale of continents. If this is correct, it is no longer possible to separate local ecological processes from those at broad, geographical scales. However, biogeo- graphical processes differ from those happening in one or a few localities; at the broader scales,there are additional processes occurring which are only evident when examined from this wider perspective. We integrate biogeography with ecology, explaining broad-scale effects, ranging from processes happening locally as the result of responses of individual organisms to perpetual changes in living conditions in heterogeneous space. The models to be used cannot be those traditional in population dynamics with a dispersal parameter plugged in, but must be spatially explicit. Only a broad-scale perspective of con- tinual redistribution of large groups of individuals or reproductive propagules can give dispersal its biological and biogeographical significance. Our general thesis in this chapter is that adaptation in non-uniform space enables individuals to cope effectively with environmental variation in time. In our analyses of spatially adaptive processes, we concentrate on principles rather than on details of specific phenomena, such as types of distance distribution. We therefore formulate these principles in terms of simple Poisson processes.In spe- cific cases, these distributions can be replaced by more complex ones which may fit better.
    [Show full text]
  • Can More K-Selected Species Be Better Invaders?
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2007) 13, 535–543 Blackwell Publishing Ltd BIODIVERSITY Can more K-selected species be better RESEARCH invaders? A case study of fruit flies in La Réunion Pierre-François Duyck1*, Patrice David2 and Serge Quilici1 1UMR 53 Ӷ Peuplements Végétaux et ABSTRACT Bio-agresseurs en Milieu Tropical ӷ CIRAD Invasive species are often said to be r-selected. However, invaders must sometimes Pôle de Protection des Plantes (3P), 7 chemin de l’IRAT, 97410 St Pierre, La Réunion, France, compete with related resident species. In this case invaders should present combina- 2UMR 5175, CNRS Centre d’Ecologie tions of life-history traits that give them higher competitive ability than residents, Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), 1919 route de even at the expense of lower colonization ability. We test this prediction by compar- Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex, France ing life-history traits among four fruit fly species, one endemic and three successive invaders, in La Réunion Island. Recent invaders tend to produce fewer, but larger, juveniles, delay the onset but increase the duration of reproduction, survive longer, and senesce more slowly than earlier ones. These traits are associated with higher ranks in a competitive hierarchy established in a previous study. However, the endemic species, now nearly extinct in the island, is inferior to the other three with respect to both competition and colonization traits, violating the trade-off assumption. Our results overall suggest that the key traits for invasion in this system were those that *Correspondence: Pierre-François Duyck, favoured competition rather than colonization. CIRAD 3P, 7, chemin de l’IRAT, 97410, Keywords St Pierre, La Réunion Island, France.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basics of Population Dynamics Greg Yarrow, Professor of Wildlife Ecology, Extension Wildlife Specialist
    The Basics of Population Dynamics Greg Yarrow, Professor of Wildlife Ecology, Extension Wildlife Specialist Fact Sheet 29 Forestry and Natural Resources Revised May 2009 All forms of wildlife, regardless of the species, will respond to changes in density dependence. These concepts are important for landowners habitat, hunting or trapping, and weather conditions with fluctuations and natural resource managers to understand when making decisions in animal numbers. Most landowners have probably experienced affecting wildlife on private land. changes in wildlife abundance from year to year without really knowing why there are fewer individuals in some years than others. How Many Offspring Can Wildlife Have? In many cases, changes in abundance are normal and to be expected. Most people realize that some wildlife species can produce more The purpose of the information presented here is to help landowners offspring than others. Bobwhite quail are genetically programmed to lay understand why animal numbers may vary or change. While a number an average of 14 eggs per clutch. Each species has a maximum genetic of important concepts will be discussed, one underlying theme should reproductive potential or biotic potential. always be remembered. Regardless of whether property is managed or not in any given year, there is always some change in the habitat, Biotic potential describes a population’s ability to grow over time however small. Wildlife must adjust to this change and, therefore, no through reproduction. Most bat species are likely to produce one population is ever the same from one year to the next. offspring per year. In contrast, a female cottontail rabbit will have a litter size of approximately 5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Non-Linear Threshold Estimation of Density Effects
    sustainability Article Population Dynamics and Agglomeration Factors: A Non-Linear Threshold Estimation of Density Effects Mariateresa Ciommi 1, Gianluca Egidi 2, Rosanna Salvia 3 , Sirio Cividino 4, Kostas Rontos 5 and Luca Salvati 6,7,* 1 Department of Economic and Social Science, Polytechnic University of Marche, Piazza Martelli 8, I-60121 Ancona, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, Via San Camillo de Lellis, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics, University of Basilicata, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano, I-85100 Potenza, Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Agriculture, University of Udine, Via del Cotonificio 114, I-33100 Udine, Italy; [email protected] 5 Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, University of the Aegean, EL-81100 Mytilene, Greece; [email protected] 6 Department of Economics and Law, University of Macerata, Via Armaroli 43, I-62100 Macerata, Italy 7 Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 9, CZ-37005 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice, Czech Republic * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 14 February 2020; Accepted: 11 March 2020; Published: 13 March 2020 Abstract: Although Southern Europe is relatively homogeneous in terms of settlement characteristics and urban dynamics, spatial heterogeneity in its population distribution is still high, and differences across regions outline specific demographic patterns that require in-depth investigation. In such contexts, density-dependent mechanisms of population growth are a key factor regulating socio-demographic dynamics at various spatial levels. Results of a spatio-temporal analysis of the distribution of the resident population in Greece contributes to identifying latent (density-dependent) processes of metropolitan growth over a sufficiently long time interval (1961-2011).
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Analysis in Kenya, Senegal, and Eswatini
    sustainability Article Energy–Climate–Economy–Population Nexus: An Empirical Analysis in Kenya, Senegal, and Eswatini Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie 1,* , Emmanuel Ackom 2 , Festus Victor Bekun 3,4 and Phebe Asantewaa Owusu 1 1 Nord University Business School, Post Box 1490, 8049 Bodo, Norway; [email protected] 2 Department of Technology, Management and Economics, UNEP DTU Partnership, UN City Campus, Denmark Technical University (DTU), Marmorvej 51, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Economics Administrative and Social sciences, Istanbul Gelisim University, 34310 Istanbul, Turkey; [email protected] 4 Department of Accounting, Analysis, and Audit, School of Economics and Management, South Ural State University, 76, Lenin Aven., 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 June 2020; Accepted: 29 July 2020; Published: 31 July 2020 Abstract: Motivated by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and its impact by 2030, this study examines the relationship between energy consumption (SDG 7), climate (SDG 13), economic growth and population in Kenya, Senegal and Eswatini. We employ a Kernel Regularized Least Squares (KRLS) machine learning technique and econometric methods such as Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS), Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) regression, the Mean-Group (MG) and Pooled Mean-Group (PMG) estimation models. The econometric techniques confirm the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis between income level and CO2 emissions while the machine learning method confirms the scale effect hypothesis. We find that while CO2 emissions, population and income level spur energy demand and utilization, economic development is driven by energy use and population dynamics. This demonstrates that income, population growth, energy and CO2 emissions are inseparable, but require a collective participative decision in the achievement of the SDGs.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Typology of Urban Energy Use and Potentials for An
    Global typology of urban energy use and potentials for SPECIAL FEATURE an urbanization mitigation wedge Felix Creutziga,b,1, Giovanni Baiocchic, Robert Bierkandtd, Peter-Paul Pichlerd, and Karen C. Setoe aMercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, 10829 Berlin, Germany; bTechnische Universtität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany; cDepartment of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; dPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany; and eYale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 Edited by Sangwon Suh, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, and accepted by the Editorial Board December 4, 2014 (received for review August 17, 2013) The aggregate potential for urban mitigation of global climate (9, 10), and also with GHG emissions from the residential change is insufficiently understood. Our analysis, using a dataset sector (11). The recent IPCC report identifies urban form of 274 cities representing all city sizes and regions worldwide, as a driver of urban emissions but does not provide guidance on demonstrates that economic activity, transport costs, geographic its relative importance vis-à-vis other factors. In comparative factors, and urban form explain 37% of urban direct energy use studies, cities are often sampled from similar geographies (5, 12, and 88% of urban transport energy use. If current trends in urban 13) or population sizes (8). In these studies, causality is difficult expansion continue, urban energy use will increase more than to establish, and self-selection (14) as well as topological prop- threefold, from 240 EJ in 2005 to 730 EJ in 2050. Our model shows erties and specific urban form characteristics (15) partially ex- that urban planning and transport policies can limit the future plain the relationship between urban population density and increase in urban energy use to 540 EJ in 2050 and contribute to transport energy consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 Population Dynamics
    APES Chapter 4 Human Population Factors in human population size A. Population Growth =(Births + immigration) - (deaths + emigration) B. When factors are stable ZPG = Zero population Growth C. Use Crude birth and death rate - # per 1000 people D. Rate of change % = birth rate – death rate x 100 1,000 people E. World has slowed population rate but still growing very fast F. Fertility rates 1. Replacement level fertility – couple has 2.1 children 2. Total Fertility rate – TFR – estimate of number of children a woman would have under current age specific birth rates a. better measure b. different in different parts of the world - developed 1.6 - developing 3.4 in developing G. Fertility rates in US – more of a problem because of Americans high resource use. 1. drop in TFR but population still growing – Why? - Large number of baby boomers still in childbearing years - Increase in number of teen mothers US has highest rate of any industrialized countries UN studies say US teens not more sexually active just less likely to know how to prevent pregnancies or less willing to use them. 77% of all teen mothers go on welfare within 5 years - Higher fertility rates non Caucasian mothers - High levels of legal and illegal immigrants – accounts for more than 40% of growth H. Factors that affect Birth and fertility rates 1. level of education and affluence 2. Importance of children in the work force 3. Urbanization 4. Cost of raising and educating children 5. Educational and Employment opportunities for women 6. Infant mortality rates 7. Average age of marriage 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Handout: Ecological Footprints from Around the World
    Ecological Footprints From Around the World Handout Map Your Eco-Footprint lesson plan support material Green Star! Newsletter May/June 2006 Handout: Ecological Footprints From Around the World (Adapted from: “How big is your footprint,” Energy for a Sustainable Future — Education Project, www.esfep.org/ ) Ecological Footprints From Around the World: Where Do You Fit In? How Much Land Do You Need to Live? If you had to provide everything you use from your own land — how much land area would you need? This land would have to provide you with all of your food, water, energy and everything else that you use. The amount of land you would need to support your lifestyle is called your Ecological Footprint. The ecological footprint is one way of measuring the impact a person has on the environment. Is the World Big Enough for All of Our BIG Feet? The size of a person’s Ecological Footprint will depend on many factors. Do you grow your own food? Do you walk or drive? Do you use renewable or non-renewable energy sources? Everyone has an ecological footprint because we all need to use the earth’s resources to survive. But we must make sure we don’t take more resources than the earth can provide. Different people in the same country will have different sized ecological footprints. Different countries also have different ecological footprints. For example, a person with the average Canadian lifestyle has an ecological footprint of 8.56 hectares. A person living in Ethiopia, Africa, has an average ecological footprint of 0.67 hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Ecological Communities in Variable Environments –Local and Spatial Processes
    Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertation No. 1431 Dynamics of ecological communities in variable environments –local and spatial processes Linda Kaneryd Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology Theoretical Biology Linköping University SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden Linköping, Mars 2012 Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertation No. 1431 Kaneryd, L. Dynamics of ecological communities in variable environments – local and spatial processes Copyright © Linda Kaneryd, unless otherwise noted Also available from Linköping University Electronic Press http://www.ep.liu.se/ ISBN: 978 – 91 – 7519 – 946 – 7 ISSN: 0345 – 7524 Front cover: Designed by Johan Sjögren, photo by courtesy of Dan Tommila Printed by LiU-Tryck, Linköping 2012 Abstract The ecosystems of the world are currently facing a variety of anthropogenic perturbations, such as climate change, fragmentation and destruction of habitat, overexploitation of natural resources and invasions of alien species. How the ecosystems will be affected is not only dependent on the direct effects of the perturbations on individual species but also on the trophic structure and interaction patterns of the ecological community. Of particular current concern is the response of ecological communities to climate change. Increased global temperature is expected to cause an increased intensity and frequency of weather extremes. A more unpredictable and more variable environment will have important consequences not only for individual species but also for the dynamics of the entire community. If we are to fully understand the joint effects of a changing climate and habitat fragmentation, there is also a need to understand the spatial aspects of community dynamics. In the present work we use dynamic models to theoretically explore the importance of local (Paper I and II) and spatial processes (Paper III-V) for the response of multi-trophic communities to different kinds of perturbations.
    [Show full text]