DOCSLIB.ORG

Municipal Development Plan No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Municipal Development Plan No MunicipalMunicipal DistrictDistrict ofof PincherPincher CreekCreek NoNo.. 99 Municipal Development Plan No. 1062-02 September 2002 (Amended to Bylaw No. 1153-08, April 2009) Prepared by the September 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION A. Location .................................................................................................................... 1 B. The Evolution of Local Land Use Policies ............................................................... 1 C. Why Prepare a Municipal Development Plan? ........................................................ 2 D. What Does a Municipal Development Plan Address? ............................................. 3 E. Municipal Development Plans and the Planning Hierarchy ..................................... 5 F. Municipal Development Plan Preparation Process.................................................. 5 II. DEFINITIONS, GOAL AND OBJECTIVES A. Definitions ................................................................................................................ 7 B. Goal .......................................................................................................................... 9 C. Objectives ................................................................................................................ 9 III. MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN POLICIES A. Waiver of Municipal Development Plan Policies ...................................................... 13 B. General Future Land Use ........................................................................................ 13 C. Proposals for Future Land Use in the Municipality .................................................. 14 D. Coordination With Adjacent Municipalities ............................................................... 14 E. Transportation .......................................................................................................... 14 F. Forestry Reserve and Other Public Lands ............................................................... 15 G. Urban Fringe ............................................................................................................ 15 H. Hamlets .................................................................................................................... 16 General ............................................................................................................. 16 Beaver Mines ................................................................................................... 16 Lundbreck......................................................................................................... 17 Pincher Station ................................................................................................. 17 Twin Butte ........................................................................................................ 17 I. Environmentally Significant Areas ........................................................................... 17 J. Provision of Municipal Services and Utilities ........................................................... 18 K. Resource Conservation and Natural Resources ..................................................... 18 Agriculture ........................................................................................................ 18 Page Non-Renewable Resources ............................................................................. 18 Water Resources ............................................................................................. 19 Historic Resources ........................................................................................... 19 Wind Energy ..................................................................................................... 19 L. Residential Density .................................................................................................. 20 Dwellings Per Parcel ........................................................................................ 20 Minimum Residential Parcel Size .................................................................... 21 M. Country Residences ................................................................................................. 21 Grouped Country Residential is Prohibited Unless Area is Designated .......... 21 Grouped Country Residential Designation Criteria .......................................... 21 N. Industrial Development in Rural Areas .................................................................... 23 O. Commercial Development in Rural Areas ................................................................ 24 P. Confined Feeding Operations (CFOs) ..................................................................... 25 Q. Municipal and Environmental Reserves .................................................................. 25 R. Subdivision Policies ................................................................................................. 27 Application of Subdivision Policies ................................................................... 27 General Requirements for All Subdivisions ..................................................... 27 Variances of Minimum Residual Agricultural Lot Size ..................................... 28 Subdivision of Agricultural Land for Extensive Agricultural Use ...................... 28 Allowable Country Residential Subdivisions .................................................... 28 Subdivision of a Single Residential Lot from an Unsubdivided Quarter Section ............................................................................................. 28 Subdivision of a Single Residential Lot from a Subdivided Quarter Section ............................................................................................. 29 Subdivision of Fragmented Parcels ................................................................. 29 Rural Industrial and Commercial Subdivisions ................................................ 29 Subdivision of Confined Feeding Operations................................................... 30 Property Realignment ...................................................................................... 30 APPENDIX 1 – Figures of Subdivision Examples MAP 1 – Regional Location .................................................................................. following 2 MAP 2 – Guide Map ............................................................................................... following 2 MAP 3 – Confined Feeding Operations Prohibited Areas ................................. following 26 SCHEDULE A MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF PINCHER CREEK NO. 9 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN I. INTRODUCTION A. LOCATION The Municipal District of Pincher Creek is located in the southwestern portion of the province as shown on Map 1. It contains both foothills and prairie lands making flexible decision making an important aspect of the plan. Map 2 shows some of the main features of the municipal district including: • Highways 3, 22 and 6; • the urban municipalities including the Town of Pincher Creek and Village of Cowley; • the Hamlet areas of Beaver Mines, Lowland Heights, Lundbreck, Pincher Station and Twin Butte; • part of the Bow Crow Forest; • on the south boundary of the municipal district, Waterton National Park; • the Burmis Lundbreck Area Structure Plan; • main water bodies; • provincial parks. B. THE EVOLUTION OF LOCAL LAND USE POLICIES To understand why the Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 (M.D. 9) has chosen to prepare a Municipal development plan (MDP) it is useful to review, from the M.D.’s perspective, the evolution of land use policies at the local, regional and provincial levels. In the early 1960s, the M.D. adopted an Interim Development Control Bylaw. These bylaws were originally conceived to allow flexible control of development while work on a General Plan was progressing. As such, they were a distinct alternative to the traditional zoning bylaws that were in use in many urban municipalities at the time. But instead of preparing a General Plan for the municipality, the M.D., along with other rural municipalities in southwestern Alberta, became involved in the preparation of a Preliminary Regional Plan that the Regional Planning Commission was required to produce in consultation with the affected municipalities. The predecessors to the Regional Planning Commissions, namely the District Planning Commissions, were established in the 1950s and early 1960s to bring order to fringe development and haphazard rural subdivision around major urban centres. Over time, these Commissions assumed additional responsibilities including subdivision approval and the Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Municipal Development Plan Bylaw No. 1062-02 Page 1 preparation of a Preliminary Regional Plan. In southwestern Alberta, the perceived need for rural municipal General Plans was deferred following the adoption of the Oldman River Region’s Preliminary Regional Plan in 1974. This plan, at the time, was often viewed as an effective and efficient substitute for rural General Plans in each of the rural municipalities. But by the early 1980s, increased concern about local autonomy, especially elsewhere in the Province, had replaced concerns that planning decisions should be somewhat removed from the local political environment. M.D. 9 adopted its first General Municipal Plan (GMP) in 1987. As the community’s first plan, the GMP was neither comprehensive nor exhaustive. Council’s decision to prepare such a plan,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015 Municipal Codes
    2015 Municipal Codes Updated December 11, 2015 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2015 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS CHANGES: 0356 - The Town of Chestermere became the City of Chestermere (effective January 1, 2015). NAME CHANGES: 0356 - The City of Chestermere (effective January 1, 2015) from Town of Chestermere. 0506 - Big Lakes County (effective March 6, 2015) from Municipal District of Big Lakes. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: DISSOLVED: 0221 – The Village of Minburn dissolved and became part the County of Minburn (effective July 1, 2015). CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0522 Metis Settlements General Council 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (391) 09 Specialized Municipalities (5) 20 Services Commissions (71) 06 Municipal Districts (64) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (107) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (92) 50 Local Government Associations (21) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (5) 08 Special Areas (3) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) December 11, 2015 Page 1 of 13 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING MUNICIPAL DISTRICT of PINCHER CREEK June 12, 2018 1:00 Pm
    AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF PINCHER CREEK June 12, 2018 1:00 pm A. ADOPTION OF AGENDA B. DELEGATIONS 1. Grant Writer Update - Email from Pincher Creek & Area Early Childhood Coalition, dated May 30, 2018 C. MINUTES 1. Council Committee Meeting Minutes - May 22, 2018 2. Council Meeting Minutes - May 22, 2018 D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Landfill Road Maintenance Agreement Reply - Report from Director of Operations, dated June 6, 2018 E. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OFFICER’S (CAO) REPORTS 1. Operations a) Spring Road Tour - Council to schedule a date for the road tour b) Cowley Lions Club – Request for Gravel - Report from Director of Operations, dated June 6, 2018 c) Beaver Mines Water and Wastewater Project Briefing - Briefing dated June 7, 2018 d) Operations Report - Report from Director of Operations, dated June 6, 2018 - Call Log 2. Planning and Development a) Beaver Mines Community Association Request for Subdivision Moratorium - Report from Director of Development and Community Services, dated June 6, 2018 b) Event Licence – Mud Bog, SW 7-6-28 W4M - Report from Director of Development and Community Services, dated June 6, 2018 3. Finance a) Public Auction – Conditions and Reserve Bids - Report from Director of Finance, dated June 1, 2018 b) Statement of Cash Position - For Month Ending May 2018 4. Municipal a) Interim Chief Administrative Officer Report - Report from Interim Chief Administrative Officer, dated June 7, 2018 - Call Log F. CORRESPONDENCE 1. For Action a) Special Advocacy Fund - Brochure and Funding Request from
    [Show full text]
  • Horse Stables
    Horse Stables For generations trail riding has given visitors the time to get the most from the park’s surroundings which are always scenic and often spectacular with the added benefit of not expending too much of their own energy.1 Being able to rent a horse in the park was and is a decided visitor attraction. Shortly after the end of the First World War, in 1921, the first horse rental operation was opened by L. John Bevan,2 a guide and outfitter with 20 years’ experience in the Rockies.3 He provided customers with everything necessary for their ride or outing. All rates were established by the government and printed or posted as necessary.4 Bevan also guided hunting parties outside the park boundaries at rates that he was free to set according to the services provided. Bevan was 39 years old when he started at Waterton having immigrated from Wales 20 years before.5 He applied for a lease in 1921 in the lower park compound area where he built a five-room log house, stable and storage building.6 Despite having been given good reviews in The Lethbridge Herald and advertising on a regular basis, he soon sold his business to the Morris Brothers in 1924.7 The Morris Brothers, Scott,8 Eugene, Edward and Cliff, operated their business from the same base as had Bevan where they had a cabin, stable and corral.9 Their timing was excellent as the post-war park improvements began coming to fruition. Among the improvements were a public golf Horseback riding in the mountains is a time honored course, one of the first in the region, tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Published Local Histories
    ALBERTA HISTORIES Published Local Histories assembled by the Friends of Geographical Names Society as part of a Local History Mapping Project (in 1995) May 1999 ALBERTA LOCAL HISTORIES Alphabetical Listing of Local Histories by Book Title 100 Years Between the Rivers: A History of Glenwood, includes: Acme, Ardlebank, Bancroft, Berkeley, Hartley & Standoff — May Archibald, Helen Bircham, Davis, Delft, Gobert, Greenacres, Kia Ora, Leavitt, and Brenda Ferris, e , published by: Lilydale, Lorne, Selkirk, Simcoe, Sterlingville, Glenwood Historical Society [1984] FGN#587, Acres and Empires: A History of the Municipal District of CPL-F, PAA-T Rocky View No. 44 — Tracey Read , published by: includes: Glenwood, Hartley, Hillspring, Lone Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44 [1989] Rock, Mountain View, Wood, FGN#394, CPL-T, PAA-T 49ers [The], Stories of the Early Settlers — Margaret V. includes: Airdrie, Balzac, Beiseker, Bottrell, Bragg Green , published by: Thomasville Community Club Creek, Chestermere Lake, Cochrane, Conrich, [1967] FGN#225, CPL-F, PAA-T Crossfield, Dalemead, Dalroy, Delacour, Glenbow, includes: Kinella, Kinnaird, Thomasville, Indus, Irricana, Kathyrn, Keoma, Langdon, Madden, 50 Golden Years— Bonnyville, Alta — Bonnyville Mitford, Sampsontown, Shepard, Tribune , published by: Bonnyville Tribune [1957] Across the Smoky — Winnie Moore & Fran Moore, ed. , FGN#102, CPL-F, PAA-T published by: Debolt & District Pioneer Museum includes: Bonnyville, Moose Lake, Onion Lake, Society [1978] FGN#10, CPL-T, PAA-T 60 Years: Hilda’s Heritage,
    [Show full text]
  • LIMITED DISCHARGE ORDER and APPROVAL of RECEIVER’S ACTIVITIES and ACCOUNTS
    Form 27 COURT FILE NUMBER 1901-14615 Clerk’s Stamp COURT COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE CALGARY APPLICANTS ORPHAN WELL ASSOCIATION RESPONDENTS HOUSTON OIL & GAS LTD. DOCUMENT APPLICATION BY RECEIVER, re: LIMITED DISCHARGE ORDER and APPROVAL OF RECEIVER’S ACTIVITIES AND ACCOUNTS ADDRESS FOR SERVICE AND Jack R. Maslen CONTACT INFORMATION OF Borden Ladner Gervais LLP PARTY FILING THIS 1900, 520 3rd Ave. S.W. DOCUMENT Calgary, AB T2P 0R3 Telephone: (403) 232-9790 Facsimile: (403) 266-1395 Email: [email protected] File No. 436743.24 NOTICE TO THE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST (SCHEDULE “A”) This application is made against you. You are a respondent. You have the right to state your side of this matter before the master/judge. To do so, you must be in Court when the application is heard as shown below: Date December 11, 2020 Time 10:00 AM Where Calgary Courts Centre (Via WebEx Video Conference) Before Whom The Honourable Mr. Justice D.B. Nixon Go to the end of this document to see what else you can do and when you must do it. REMEDY CLAIMED OR SOUGHT: 1. BDO Canada Limited (“BDO”) is the court-appointed receiver and manager (the “Receiver”) over all of the current and future assets, undertakings and properties of every nature and kind whatsoever, and wherever situate, including all proceeds thereof (the “Property), of Houston Oil & Gas Ltd. (the “Debtor” or “Houston”), pursuant to a receivership order (the “Receivership Order”) of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta (the “Court”) pronounced on October 29, 2019, 2 as amended by an Order of the Court in Action Number 2001-07870 pronounced on June 30, 2020 (the “Receivership Order”).
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Alberta, North West Territories, British Columbia And
    D IS TRIBUTI ON ALBERTA N ORTH E TERRITORI S BRITI S , W S T E , H COLUMB IA AN D YUKON TERRITORY CONTAINING m 1 . of Ofli The na es the Post ces alphabetically arranged . Th m o 2 . e f of C na es the Postal Car Routes , Sections Postal ar Routes or Distribution m for Offices through which atter the several offices should pass . m of m 3 . The na es the Offices to which the atter is forwarded by the Railway Mail Clerks m i di . or Distributing Offi ces when not ailed direct . (D rect Mails are in cated by dotted lines ) o 4 . The names f the Mail Routes by whi ch the offices are served when not situated on a o m line of Railway . Wh en an office is served by two or more routes the hours f departure fro the several terminal points are given . -O . m 5 ffices . Nixie List closed, na es changed — 6 . Offices in Northwest Territories Page 137 . INSTRUCTIONS for w i m l f 1 . Matter any office hich is suppl ed by ore than one route shou d be orwarded by m the one by which it will ost speedily reach its destination . i m 2 . Wh en any doubt ex sts as to the proper railway route by which atter should be f m c . orwarded, application should be ade to the District Director or Superintendent, Postal Servi e O m 3 . fli c es hi newly established, and offi ces to w ch new na es have been given , should be written in the List of Offices having the same initial letter .
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Municipal Codes
    2017 Municipal Codes Updated December 22, 2017 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2017 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS CHANGES: 0315 - The Village of Thorsby became the Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017). NAME CHANGES: 0315- The Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017) from Village of Thorsby. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: DISSOLVED: 0038 –The Village of Botha dissolved and became part of the County of Stettler (effective September 1, 2017). 0352 –The Village of Willingdon dissolved and became part of the County of Two Hills (effective September 1, 2017). CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0522 Metis Settlements General Council 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (5) 20 Services Commissions (71) 06 Municipal Districts (64) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (108) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (87) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (5) 08 Special Areas (3) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) December 22, 2017 Page 1 of 13 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • New Russell Substation
    New Russell Substation April 2010 ! UV510 ! How can you provide input? Why are you receiving this newsletter? Your input is important to us and we will work with you to ensure your concerns and issues are understood Cowley You are receiving this newsletter because you are a resident, and responded to. You can provide your feedback by: UV3 occupant or landowner near the proposed Russell Substation RUSSELL Pincher Station project in the Pincher Creek area and we want your input. Contacting us directly ! 632S Phone: 1-877-267-1453 ") E-mail: [email protected]. What does this project involve? r e Lowland Heights ! v i AltaLink is proposing to: Engaging in personal consultations s t l a e R PINCHER C • Build a new substation called Russell 632S AltaLink representatives will contact residents and landowners near the Russell Substation in April and May to UV507 CREEK address any questions or concerns. • Reconfigure the existing transmission line UV6 • Salvage approximately 100 metres of existing We will summarize your input and any commitments we make to you in a Facility Application (FA). The FA transmission line describes our plans to meet technical requirements set by the AESO and provides information on routing, environment, costs, project components and schedules and our participant involvement program. Your name We want to provide you with: may be disclosed in our FA, but your specific concerns will not. We will submit the FA to the AUC for its • Project details approval. The AUC is the independent, quasi-judicial agency that ensures the fair and responsible delivery of • A project schedule our utility services.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated May 24, 2019 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Beaverdam Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL of ALBERTA POSTAL HISTORY Issue
    JOURNAL OF ALBERTA POSTAL HISTORY Issue #11 Edited by Dale Speirs, Box 6830, Calgary, Alberta T2P 2E7, or [email protected] Published November 2016 CHECKLIST OF ALBERTA POSTAL HISTORIES compiled by Dale Speirs When I first began considering writing the postal history of Alberta, I did a literature search and found next to nothing. Much of what passes for postal history for any area is not. The following are not genuine postal history: 1) Checklists of postmarks. I collect postmarks myself but by themselves they are artifacts, not the actual history of a post office. 2) “Here is a cover” stories. Interesting, but only vignettes. 3) Social histories of towns illustrated by some covers or stamps. This is the most common type of pseudo-postal history. Long detailed accounts of a settlement but only a paragraph or two about the post office or the people who ran them. I recently ran into a problem with writing Alberta postal history, that of duplication by others. The May 2016 forest fire which caused the evacuation of Fort McMurray in the Athabasca Tar Sands prompted me to spend several weeks writing a postal history of the area. You can imagine my dismay when I opened the Sep/Oct 2016 issue of CANADIAN PHILATELIST and discovered that David Piercey had beaten me into print on the subject. A fine article, and I hold no grudge. It’s just one of those things. As a result, this issue of JAPH has a checklist of postal history articles of Alberta already published, the genuine kind, not here-is-a-cover stories, to help others avoid duplication.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Population of Places on the Alberta Road Map with Less Than 50 People
    Updated Population of Places on the Alberta Road Map with less than 50 People Place Population Place Population Abee 25 Huallen 28 Altario 26 Hylo 22 Ardenode 0 Iddesleigh 14 Armena 35 Imperial Mills 19 Atikameg 22 Indian Cabins 11 Atmore 37 Kapasiwin 14 Beauvallon 7 Kathryn 29 Beaver Crossing 18 Kavanagh 41 Beaverdam 15 Kelsey 10 Bindloss 14 Keoma 40 Birch Cove 19 Kirkcaldy 24 Bloomsbury 18 Kirriemuir 28 Bodo 26 La Corey 40 Brant 46 Lafond 36 Breynat 22 Lake Isle 26 Brownfield 27 Larkspur 21 Buford 47 Leavitt 48 Burmis 32 Lindale 26 Byemoor 40 Lindbrook 18 Carcajou 17 Little Smoky 28 Carvel 37 Lyalta 21 Caslan 23 MacKay 15 Cessford 31 Madden 36 Chinook 38 Manola 29 Chisholm 20 Mariana Lake 8 Compeer 21 Marten Beach 38 Conrich 19 McLaughlin 41 Cynthia 37 Meeting Creek 42 Dalemead 32 Michichi 42 Dapp 27 Millarville 43 De Winton 44 Mission Beach 37 Deadwood 22 Mossleigh 47 Del Bonita 20 Musidora 13 Dorothy 14 Nestow 10 Duvernay 26 Nevis 30 Ellscott 10 New Bridgden 24 Endiang 35 New Dayton 47 Ensign 17 Nisku 40 Falun 25 Nojack 19 Fitzgerald 4 North Star 49 Flatbush 30 Notekiwin 17 Fleet 28 Onefour 31 Gadsby 40 Opal 13 Gem 24 Orion 11 Genesee 18 Peace Point 21 Glenevis 25 Peoria 12 Goodfare 11 Perryvale 20 Hairy Hill 46 Pincher 35 Heath 14 Pocahontas 10 Hilliard 35 Poe 15 Hoadley 9 Purple Springs 26 Hobbema 35 Queenstown 15 Page 1 of 2 Updated Population of Places on the Alberta Road Map with less than 50 People Rainier1 29 Star 32 Raven 12 Steen River 12 Red Willow 40 Streamstown 15 Reno 20 Sundance Beach 37 Ribstone 48 Sunnynook 13 Rich Valley 32 Tangent 39 Richdale 14 Tawatinaw 10 Rivercourse 14 Telfordville 28 Rowley 11 Tulliby Lake 18 St.
    [Show full text]
  • AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region
    AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Chief Economist https://albertare.configio.com/page/ann-marie-lurie-bioAnn-Marie Lurie analyzes Alberta’s resale housing statistics both provincially and regionally. In order to allow for better analysis of housing sales data, we have aligned our reporting regions to the census divisions used by Statistics Canada. Economic Region AB-NW: Athabasca – Grande Prairie – Peace River 17 16 Economic Region AB-NE: Wood Buffalo – Cold Lake Economic Region AB-W: 19 Banff – Jasper – Rocky Mountain House 18 12 Economic Region AB-Edmonton 13 14 Economic Region AB-Red Deer 11 10 Economic Region AB-E: 9 8 7 Camrose – Drumheller 15 6 4 5 Economic Region AB-Calgary Economic Region AB-S: 2 1 3 Lethbridge – Medicine Hat New reports are released on the sixth of each month, except on weekends or holidays when it is released on the following business day. AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region 1 Alberta Economic Region North West Grande Prairie – Athabasca – Peace River Division 17 Municipal District Towns Hamlets, villages, Other Big Lakes County - 0506 High Prairie - 0147 Enilda (0694), Faust (0702), Grouard Swan Hills - 0309 (0719), Joussard (0742), Kinuso (0189), Rural Big Lakes County (9506) Clear Hills – 0504 Cleardale (0664), Worsley (0884), Hines Creek (0150), Rural Big Lakes county (9504) Lesser Slave River no 124 - Slave Lake - 0284 Canyon Creek (0898), Chisholm (0661), 0507 Flatbush (0705), Marten Beach (0780), Smith (0839), Wagner (0649), Widewater (0899), Slave Lake (0284), Rural Slave River (9507) Northern Lights County - Manning – 0212 Deadwood (0679), Dixonville (0684), 0511 North Star (0892), Notikewin (0893), Rural Northern Lights County (9511) Northern Sunrise County - Cadotte Lake (0645), Little Buffalo 0496 (0762), Marie Reine (0777), Reno (0814), St.
    [Show full text]