Reproductive Success of Nesting Terns and Black Skimmers On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reproductive Success of Nesting Terns and Black Skimmers On REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF NESTING TERNS AND BLACK SKIMMERS ON THE CENTRAL TEXAS COAST A Thesis by RACHEL R. FERN Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University and the Graduate Faculty of The Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the joint degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Kim Withers Committee Members, John Tunnell Graham Hickman Head of Department, Gilbert Rowe December 2013 Major Subject: Marine Biology Copyright 2013 Rachel R. Fern REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF NESTING TERNS AND BLACK SKIMMERS ON THE CENTRAL TEXAS COAST A Thesis prepared by RACHEL R. FERN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University and Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the joint degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE ! ! ! ! November,!2013! ! ! ! ! Major!Subject:!Marine!Biology! ABSTRACT Reproductive Success of Nesting Terns and Black Skimmers on the Central Texas Coast (October, 2013) Rachel R. Fern, B.S., Texas State University M.S., Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Kim Withers Seabirds are top predators at sea and are particularly sensitive to changes in the marine environment. This gives them significant potential as bioindicators of the current state of and shifts in marine ecosystems. Nest site selection is important because the demands of reproduction can be substantial and the reproducing pair is often confined to the area selected for the duration of the breeding season. Location of the nest in relation to vegetative cover, colony density and richness can strongly influence reproductive success via exposure to predators or weather events and competition for food resources and optimal nest sites. Additionally, the timing of nesting in the breeding season can influence the outcome of the breeding effort due to storm events and increasing ambient temperatures. This study defines temporal effects and correlations between reproductive success of nesting terns and skimmers and environmental characteristics of the nest site: area (ha), vegetative coverage, Spartina spp. coverage, elevation, nest density, assemblage richness and human disturbance. The four species included in this research (Forster’s Tern Sterna forsteri, Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica, Least Tern Sternula antillarum and Black Skimmer Rhynchops niger) were monitored at various nesting sites during the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons. Reproductive success of Forster’s Terns ! i! seemed to be influenced by human disturbance, nest density and species richness of the nest site. Elevation and Spartina spp. coverage both positively influenced the success of Least Terns. The nesting success of Gull-billed Terns was positively correlated with elevation and species richness of the nest site, and success of Black Skimmers was negatively correlated with species richness and positively correlated with elevation. All species that nested early in the breeding season suffered nest failure due to storm events; however, Gull-billed Terns were only marginally impacted. Establishing these correlations in environmental nest site characteristics and reproductive success of nesting terns and skimmers provides a baseline understanding of tern and skimmer breeding biology in the central Coastal Bend region of Texas, which may assist future management decisions and restoration efforts. ! ii! TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………….. i TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………. iii LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………… iv LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………….. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………….. vi BACKGROUND AND RELEVANCE…………………………………………… 1 SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS……………………………………………………….. 4 OBJECTIVES………………………………………………………………………. 7 METHODS………………………………………………………………………….. 8 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION……………………………………………………. 13 Forster’s Tern Sterna forsteri ……………………………………………... 13 Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica……………………………………. 18 Least Tern Sternula antillarum……………………………………………. 21 Black Skimmer Rynchops niger…………………………………………… 25 TRENDS AND MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS……………………………. 30 LITERATURE CITED……………………………………………………………. 33 ! iii! LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Data measured for all nest site environmental characteristics: area, elevation, Spartina coverage, vegetative cover, disturbance and richness…....................14 Table 2. Nesting success data for Forster’s Terns at the NBSR and Oso Bay sites pooled for the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons……………………………………15 Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients for relationships between measured environmental nest site characteristics and reproductive success of Forster’s, Least, and Gull-billed Terns and Black Skimmers……………………………………....15 Table 4. Nesting success data for Gull-billed Terns at the NBSR and Oso Bay sites pooled for the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons……………………………………19 Table 5. Nesting success data for Least Terns at the NBSR and Campus beach sites pooled for the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons.…………………………………...22 Table 6. Nesting success data for Black Skimmers at the NBSR and TxDoT island sites pooled for the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons…………………………….26 ! iv! LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1. Map showing study sites in the central Coastal Bend region of Texas.…………………………………………………………………………….……..9 Fig. 2. Map showing the ten islands within site 4, the Nueces Bay Salt Marsh Restoration site that were monitored during the 2012 and 2013 breeding season……….10 Fig. 3. Temporal distribution of total nest density, initiation, and success of nesting Forster’s Terns at the NBSR site pooled from the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons…………………………………………………………………………15 Fig.!4.!Temporal distribution of total nest density, initiation, and success of nesting Forster’s Terns at the Oso Bay site pooled from the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons…………………………………………………………………………16 Fig. 5. Temporal distribution of total nest density, initiation, and success of nesting Gull-billed Terns at the NBSR site pooled from the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons…………………………………………………………………………19 Fig. 6. Temporal distribution of total nest density, initiation, and success of nesting Gull-billed Terns at the Oso Bay site pooled from the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons…………………………………………………………………………20 Fig. 7. Temporal distribution of total nest density, initiation, and nest success for nesting Least Terns at the NBSR site pooled for the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons…………………………………………………………………………22 Fig. 8. Temporal distribution of total nest density, initiation, and nest success for nesting Least Terns at the Campus beach site pooled for the 2012 and 2013 breeding seasons…………………………………………………………………………23 Fig. 9. Temporal distribution of total nest density, initiation and success of nesting Black Skimmers at the NBSR site pooled for the 2012 and 2013 seasons…………………………………………………………………………………...26 Fig. 10. Temporal distribution of total nest density, initiation and success of nesting Black Skimmers at the NBSR site pooled for the 2012 and 2013 seasons…………………………………………………………………………………...27 Fig. 11. Temporal distribution of total nest density, initiation and success of nesting Black Skimmers at the TxDoT leased island pooled for the 2012 and 2013 seasons…………………………………………………………………………………...27 ! v! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to, first, thank my advisor Dr. Kim Withers, and my committee members, Dr. John W. Tunnell and Dr. Graham C. Hickman for their help and guidance in the completion of this graduate thesis. I would also like to extend my gratitude to the Center of Coastal Studies for the use of vehicles and equipment as well as providing funding through the Hans and Patricia Suter Endowment Fund. Also, I would like to offer a genuine thank you to the Coastal Bend Audubon Society for their generous financial contribution. Additionally, I want to express my appreciation for David Newstead and Owen Fitzsimmons of the Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries Program and Beau Hardegree of United States Fish and Wildlife Service for their patience and assistance throughout the duration of this research. This project would have never succeeded without your help. I would also like to thank my field help: Lee Schoech, Lindsey George, Jessica Durgin and Jacob Harrison. I would have not been able to complete the field monitoring alone, and I sincerely appreciate the time each of you took to help make this happen. To my family, although you are many miles away, your support for my educational strides is felt, and I appreciate your patience and eagerness to provide me with emotional, financial or physical support whenever it is needed. To everyone that helped me through this process, thank you. ! vi! ! 1! BACKGROUND AND RELEVANCE Although most seabirds spend the majority of their time in pelagic zones, their influence on the coastal environment can be substantial. Terns (Family Sternidae) in particular, are top marine predators at sea and carry nutrients from the open ocean to terrestrial systems where they can significantly alter plant communities and soil properties (Moller et al. 2000). Considering the integral role they play in linking pelagic and coastal landscapes, discerning the interactions between seabirds and the environment is crucial in establishing any baseline understanding of coastal ecology. Terns show particular sensitivity to biotic changes in the marine environment and these changes often manifest in abnormal reproductive behavior or output (Le Corre and Jaquemet 2004). Thus, terns have significant potential as bioindicators in marine ecosystems
Recommended publications
  • First Bolivian Record of Laughing Gull Leucophaeus Atricilla, and Two Noteworthy Records of Fulica Coots from Laguna Guapilo, Dpto
    Cotinga 41 First Bolivian record of Laughing Gull Leucophaeus atricilla, and two noteworthy records of Fulica coots from Laguna Guapilo, dpto. Santa Cruz Matthew L. Brady, Anna E. Hiller, Damián I. Rumiz, Nanuq L. Herzog-Hamel and Sebastian K. Herzog Received 30 November 2018; fnal revision accepted 29 April 2019 Cotinga 41 (2019): 98–100 published online 21 June 2019 El 28 de enero de 2018, durante una visita a laguna Guapilo, al este de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, depto. Santa Cruz, Bolivia, observamos una Gaviota Reidora Leucophaeus atricilla, el primer registro en Bolivia. Adicionalmente, observamos comportamiento indicativo de anidación de la Gallareta Chica Fulica leucoptera, una especie que se consideraba como visitante no reproductiva en Bolivia, así como una Gallareta Andina Fulica ardesiaca, el primer registro para el depto. Santa Cruz. La reproducción de F. leucoptera en la laguna Guapilo fue confrmada el 5 de mayo de 2018 mediante la fotografía de un polluelo. On 28 January 2018, MLB, AEH, NLH-H and We aged the bird during the observation SKH observed several notable birds at Laguna based on the following combination of characters: Guapilo (17°46’50”S 63°05’48”W), a semi-urban uniformly dark primaries, without the white apical park 8.9 km east of Santa Cruz city centre, dpto. spots typical of older birds; a dark tail-band; Santa Cruz, Bolivia. The habitat is dominated by a extensive ash-grey neck and breast; and worn, c.35-ha lagoon, with dense mats of reeds and water brownish wing-coverts. These features are typical hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes at the edges, and of an advanced frst-year L.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Barrier-Type Coastal Complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay Area, South Texas Gulf Coast
    Stratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Barrier-Type Coastal Complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay Area, South Texas Gulf Coast U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1328 COVER: Landsat image showing a regional view of the South Texas coastal zone. IUR~AtJ Of ... lt~f<ARY I. liBRARY tPotC Af•a .VAStf. , . ' U. S. BUREAU eF MINES Western Field Operation Center FEB 1919S7 East 360 3rd Ave. IJ.tA~t tETUI~· Spokane, Washington .99~02. m UIIM» S.tratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Barrier-Type Coastal Complex, Mustang Island­ Corpus Christi Bay Area, South Texas Gulf Coast Edited by GERALD L. SHIDELER A. Stratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Coastal Complex, South Texas-Introduction and Geologic Framework, by Gerald L. Shideler B. Seismic and Physical Stratigraphy of Late Quaternary Deposits, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Gerald L. Shideler · C. Ostracodes from Late Quaternary Deposits, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Thomas M. Cronin D. Petrology and Diagenesis of Late Quaternary Sands, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Romeo M. Flores and C. William Keighin E. Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Late Quaternary Fine-grained Sediments, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Romeo M. Flores and Gerald L. Shideler U.S. G E 0 L 0 G I CAL SURVEY P R 0 FE S S I 0 N A L p·A PER I 3 2 8 UNrfED S~fA~fES GOVERNMENT PRINTING ·OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1986 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Main entry under title: Stratigraphic studies of a late Quaternary barrier-type coastal complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay area, South Texas Gulf Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Laughing Gulls Breed Primarily Along the Pacific Coast of Mexico and the Atlantic and Caribbean Coasts from S
    LAUGHING GULL Leucophaeus atricilla non-breeding visitor, regular winterer L.a. megalopterus Laughing Gulls breed primarily along the Pacific coast of Mexico and the Atlantic and Caribbean coasts from s. Canada to Venezuela, and they winter S to Peru and the Amazon delta (AOU 1998, Howell and Dunn 2007). It and Franklin's Gull were placed along with other gulls in the genus Larus until split by the AOU (2008). Vagrant Laughing Gulls have been reported in Europe (Cramp and Simmons 1983) and widely in the Pacific, from Clipperton I to Wake Atoll (Rauzon et al. 2008), Johnston Atoll (records of at least 14 individuals, 1964-2003), Palmyra, Baker, Kiribati, Pheonix, Marshall, Pitcairn, Gambier, and Samoan Is, as well as Australia/New Zealand (King 1967; Clapp and Sibley 1967; Sibley and McFarlane 1968; Pratt et al. 1987, 2010; Garrett 1987; Wragg 1994; Higgins and Davies 1996; Vanderwerf et al. 2004; Hayes et al. 2015; E 50:13 [identified as Franklin's Gull], 58:50). Another interesting record is of one photographed attending an observer rowing solo between San Francisco and Australia at 6.5° N, 155° W, about 1400 km S of Hawai'i I, 1-2 Nov 2007. They have been recorded almost annually as winter visitors to the Hawaiian Islands since the mid-1970s, numbers increasing from the NW to the SE, as would be expected of this N American species. The great majority of records involve first-year birds, and, despite the many records in the S Pacific, there is no evidence for a transient population through the Hawaiian Islands, or of individuals returning for consecutive winters after departing in spring.
    [Show full text]
  • First Confirmed Record of Belcher's Gull Larus Belcheri for Colombia with Notes on the Status of Other Gull Species
    First confirmed record of Belcher's Gull Larus belcheri for Colombia with notes on the status of other gull species Primer registro confirmado de la Gaviota Peruana Larus belcheri para Colombia con notas sobre el estado de otras especies de gaviotas Trevor Ellery1 & José Ferney Salgado2 1 Independent. Email: [email protected] 2 Corporación para el Fomento del Aviturismo en Colombia. Abstract We present photographic records of a Belcher's Gull Larus belcheri from the Colombian Caribbean region. These are the first confirmed records of this species in the country. Keywords: new record, range extension, gull, identification. Resumen Presentamos registros fotograficos de un individuo de la Gaviota Peruana Larus belcheri en la region del Caribe de Colombia. Estos son los primeros registros confirmados para el país. Palabras clave: Nuevo registro, extensión de distribución, gaviota, identificación. Introduction the Pacific Ocean coasts of southern South America, and Belcher's Gull or Band-tailed Gull Larus belcheri has long Olrog's Gull L. atlanticus of southern Brazil, Uruguay and been considered a possible or probable species for Argentina (Howell & Dunn 2007, Remsen et al. 2018). Colombia, with observations nearby from Panama (Hilty & Brown 1986). It was first listed for Colombia by Salaman A good rule of thumb for gulls in Colombia is that if it's not et al. (2001) without any justification or notes, perhaps on a Laughing Gull Leucophaeus atricilla, then it's interesting. the presumption that the species could never logically have A second good rule of thumb for Colombian gulls is that if reached the Panamanian observation locality from its it's not a Laughing Gull, you are probably watching it at Los southern breeding grounds without passing through the Camarones or Santuario de Fauna y Flora Los Flamencos, country.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Beach-Nesting Bird Report, 2005-2008
    Florida Beach-nesting Bird Report Summary of FWC’s Beach-nesting Bird Database from 2005-2008 Prepared by Chris Burney FWC Shorebird Partnership Coordinator [email protected] FLORIDA BNB REPORT 2005-2008 2 3 1 Florida Beach-nesting Bird Report A look back at the data collected from 2005 to 2008 and a look forward at considerations for the future. INTRODUCTION we cannot interpret these data in the same way we would those For those of you regularly submitting data online to the Florida from a systematic survey. This means that you should use a great Beach-nesting Bird (BNB) database, you are probably very fa- deal of caution in interpreting the tables and maps presented in miliar with the activity on your stretch of beach but not sure how this report. For instance, we definitely can not draw conclusions the birds and sites you monitor factor into the bigger picture. In about population status and trends (e.g. how many Least Terns view of this, we have produced the following report which sum- nest in Florida, and whether or not they are declining) from such marizes the data compiled in the BNB database from 2005 to assorted data. Despite these limitations, the BNB database does 2008. We hope that it will provide you, our contributors, a more function as a resource for current information about the distri- statewide perspective. These data would certainly not be avail- bution (i.e. where birds are nesting) and relative abundance (i.e. able if not for the dedicated work of our partners from federal, how many pairs are nesting compared to other sites) of beach- state, and local governments to private conservation organiza- nesters and provides valuable information for developing re- tions and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandrillus Leucophaeus Poensis)
    Ecology and Behavior of the Bioko Island Drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus poensis) A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Jacob Robert Owens in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2013 i © Copyright 2013 Jacob Robert Owens. All Rights Reserved ii Dedications To my wife, Jen. iii Acknowledgments The research presented herein was made possible by the financial support provided by Primate Conservation Inc., ExxonMobil Foundation, Mobil Equatorial Guinea, Inc., Margo Marsh Biodiversity Fund, and the Los Angeles Zoo. I would also like to express my gratitude to Dr. Teck-Kah Lim and the Drexel University Office of Graduate Studies for the Dissertation Fellowship and the invaluable time it provided me during the writing process. I thank the Government of Equatorial Guinea, the Ministry of Fisheries and the Environment, Ministry of Information, Press, and Radio, and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism for the opportunity to work and live in one of the most beautiful and unique places in the world. I am grateful to the faculty and staff of the National University of Equatorial Guinea who helped me navigate the geographic and bureaucratic landscape of Bioko Island. I would especially like to thank Jose Manuel Esara Echube, Claudio Posa Bohome, Maximilliano Fero Meñe, Eusebio Ondo Nguema, and Mariano Obama Bibang. The journey to my Ph.D. has been considerably more taxing than I expected, and I would not have been able to complete it without the assistance of an expansive list of people. I would like to thank all of you who have helped me through this process, many of whom I lack the space to do so specifically here.
    [Show full text]
  • After Ten Years of Trying the Bags Are Still Flying
    Inside the Moon Texas Women Anglers A2, A7 Sand Art A5 Fishing A11 P.I.E. Luau A13 Seashore Happening A16 Salty Dog by Steve Coons Issue 802 The 27° 37' 0.5952'' N | 97° 13' 21.4068'' W Island Free The voiceMoon of The Island since 1996 August 29, 2019 Weekly www.islandmoon.com FREE Around Musical Labor The Island Day on the By Dale Rankin Island The last few weeks have been Many venues surprisingly slow Around The Island. are offering live Streets from Sea Pines to Cotter have music this labor been bereft of the type of late summer day weekend traffic we have seen in years past as starting Thursday, families concentrate on heading back August 29th with to school. It’s not like Island dogs can the Mike O'Neill Blues Band from sleep in the street but the occasional 6-9 p.m. at Waves Resort. Admission lonesome coyote might be seen is free. roaming the neighborhoods. It is the Mikel Mays will be featuring quiet before the storm as sometime Karaoke on Friday from 8-Midnight. Thursday afternoon someone opens Smokehouse Guitar Army will play the gate on Interstate 37 and the Saturday (7-11PM). On Sunday, Tim tourist invasion comes swooping in Layden (Noon-4PM) and Sierra (5- from OTB and over the course of a 9) will provide live entertainment. few days hundreds of thousands of Winner, winner Sashimi dinner! The Sashimi won the best-decorated boat in the Texas Women Anglers Art Barrera will close the weekend people will fill up our little sandbar on Monday from Noon-4PM.
    [Show full text]
  • Laughing Gull Leucophaeus Atricilla
    Laughing Gull Leucophaeus atricilla Folk Name: Blackhead, Fool Gull Status: Migrant, Winter Visitor Abundance: Rare to Uncommon Habitat: Open water of lakes and rivers The Laughing Gull is a common, well-known bird of the Carolina coast. Every tourist visiting the beach is familiar with these black-hooded birds, their noisy laughs, and their ocean-side antics while they search for food. This bird is such an iconic bird of the beach that many Carolina cottages, restaurants, taverns, and other businesses are named after them. At 16 ½ inches, the Laughing Gull is just an inch smaller than the also common Ring- billed Gull. The Laughing Gull, Herring Gull, and Great Black-backed Gull are the only gulls that breed in North Carolina, and the Laughing Gull is the only gull that bred here prior to the 1960s. Around the turn of the twentieth century, back-to- April,” presumably this influx was storm related as well. back catastrophes wreaked havoc on North Carolina’s David Wright found a flock of seven at the Charlotte Laughing Gulls. First, market hunters targeted this bird Water Reservoir on 28 April, Kevin Hennings reported a along much of the East Coast, shooting scores each year Laughing Gull on 29 April on Lake Wylie in York County, and selling their valuable feathers for use in the millinery and Heathy Walker reported one in Charlotte on 10 May. trade. Fortunately, the state’s “Audubon Law,” passed Other records from the end of the twentieth century in 1903, provided some relief from this indiscriminate include: one in Mecklenburg County on November hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Breeding and Distribution of Lava Gull Leucophaeus Fuliginosus K
    Cotinga 37 Observations on the breeding and distribution of Lava Gull Leucophaeus fuliginosus K. Thalia Grant, Olivia H. Estes and Gregory B. Estes Received 7 January 2014; final revision accepted 3 December 2014 Cotinga 37 (2015): OL 22–37 published online 10 March 2015 La Gaviota de Lava Leucophaeus fuliginosus, endémica del archipiélago de Galápagos, es la gaviota más rara del mundo, cuyos hábitos de reproducción son poco conocidos. En los años 2011 y 2012 se observó anidación en la isla Genovesa en densidades mayores a las reportadas previamente en Galápagos. Las parejas reproductoras fueron muy territoriales, defendiendo áreas de hasta 70 m de diámetro contra coespecíficos. Las hembras fueron más agresivas que los machos frente a los intrusos de otras especias percibidos como una amenaza. La nidada de 1–2 huevos fue incubada por ambos miembros de la pareja en turnos de dos horas. Los polluelos salieron del nido 4–5 días después de la eclosión, seleccionando lugares en el territorio más protegidos a los cuales retornaron regularmente para descansar. Los adultos reproductores fueron depredadores oportunistas, alimentando a sus crías principalmente con huevos y polluelos de aves marinas y peces robados de las mismas aves. Reconocemos una relación parasítica entre la cleptoparásita Fragata Real Fregata magnificens y la Gaviota de Lava, y sospechamos que este es el medio principal por el cual en esta isla las gaviotas adquieren los peces que comen. Presentamos datos sobre las comunicaciones entre los padres y la cría, proporcionamos la primera serie de fotografías del desarrollo del polluelo de Gaviota de Lava y describimos una característica en el plumaje de los adultos que no ha sido descrita previamente.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Christi Bay Southeast Shoreline Resources at Risk
    Protective Action Strategies for Resources at Risk Along the Southeast Shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay After Action Report June 1, 2010 This project was conducted to develop booming strategies and techniques to protect resources at risk along the southeast shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay in Corpus Christi, Texas. The project included booming strategies, locations of potential staging areas and oil recovery collection points, shoreline type descriptions, habitat sensitivities and recommended cleanup strategies. These activities were incorporated into the ESCI 4330/5330 Oil Spill Prevention and Response course at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi in order to give the students practical experience in planning and responding to oil spills. Spatial Boundaries: The geographic limits of the project extended along the south and southeast shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay from Cole Park near downtown Corpus Christi to Demit Point at Naval Air Station-Corpus Christi. This geographic area includes city parks along the Corpus Christi bayfront, the “Blind Oso” channel, University Beach, the entrance to Oso Bay and the Naval base shoreline. Goals and Objectives: • Develop protective action strategy for the “Blind Oso” channel. Completed May 7, 2010. • Develop protective action strategy for University Beach. Completed April 29, 2010. • Develop and test protective booming strategy for the entrance to Oso Bay. Completed April 23, 2010. • Develop and test booming strategies to contain a spill at NAS-Corpus Christi storm water outfall. Completed April 16, 2010. • Identify potential staging areas within the geographic scope of the project. Completed April 1, 2010. • Identify potential oil recovery collection points within the geographic scope of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Factors Affecting Productivity and Parental
    THE FACTORS AFFECTING PRODUCTIVITY AND PARENTAL BEHAVIOR OF AMERICAN OYSTERCATCHERS IN TEXAS by Amanda N. Anderson, B.S. THESIS Presented to the faculty of The University of Houston-Clear Lake in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTERS OF SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON CLEAR LAKE December, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to give thanks and love to my parents, Lisa and Eddie for their ongoing support. You have been my rock in all circumstances and helped me persevere through life’s obstacles. I would not be the independent, hard-working, or accomplished woman I am today without you two. I want to recognize my brother, grandparents, and extended family. I have always cherished our time together during my visits back home. Thanks to my significant other, Sean Stewart for helping me get through these last few months. To my advisor, George Guillen, thank you for your guidance, support, and the opportunity to work on an amazing project. My intention for completing a research thesis was to intimately study waterbirds, and you helped me do so. I would also like to thank Jenny Oakley for providing logistical support. To my mentor and sidekick, Susan Heath, I am immensely grateful for your support, advice, and patience over the last two years. You taught me so much and helped me along the path to my avian career. I admire your passion for birds and hope I’m as bad ass as you are when I’m fifty something! I would like to thank Felipe Chavez for his ornithological expertise and always helping when called upon.
    [Show full text]
  • Laridaerefspart1 V1.2.Pdf
    Introduction This is the first of two Gull Reference lists. It includes all those species of Gull that are not included in the genus Larus. I have endeavoured to keep typos, errors, omissions etc in this list to a minimum, however when you find more I would be grateful if you could mail the details during 2014 & 2015 to: [email protected]. Grateful thanks to Wietze Janse (http://picasaweb.google.nl/wietze.janse) and Dick Coombes for the cover images. All images © the photographers. Joe Hobbs Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithologists' Union World Bird List (Gill, F. & Donsker, D. (eds.) 2014. IOC World Bird List. Available from: http://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [version 4.2 accessed April 2014]). Cover Main image: Mediterranean Gull. Hellegatsplaten, South Holland, Netherlands. 30th April 2010. Picture by Wietze Janse. Vignette: Ivory Gull. Baltimore Harbour, Co. Cork, Ireland. 4th March 2009. Picture by Richard H. Coombes. Version Version 1.2 (August 2014). Species Page No. Andean Gull [Chroicocephalus serranus] 19 Audouin's Gull [Ichthyaetus audouinii] 37 Black-billed Gull [Chroicocephalus bulleri] 19 Black-headed Gull [Chroicocephalus ridibundus] 21 Black-legged Kittiwake [Rissa tridactyla] 6 Bonaparte's Gull [Chroicocephalus philadelphia] 16 Brown-headed Gull [Chroicocephalus brunnicephalus] 20 Brown-hooded Gull [Chroicocephalus maculipennis] 20 Dolphin Gull [Leucophaeus scoresbii] 31 Franklin's Gull [Leucophaeus pipixcan] 34 Great Black-headed Gull [Ichthyaetus ichthyaetus] 41 Grey Gull [Leucophaeus
    [Show full text]