DOCSLIB.ORG

(CIVIL) NO. 229 of 2020 RAJEEV SURI ...PETITIONER Ve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(CIVIL) NO. 229 of 2020 RAJEEV SURI ...PETITIONER Ve REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 229 OF 2020 RAJEEV SURI ...PETITIONER Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS with TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 230 OF 2020 CIVIL APPEAL NO. ….…..... OF 2020 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. …………./2020) (@ Diary No. 8430/2020) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 510/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 638/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 681/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 845/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 853 OF 2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 922/2020 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1041/2020 1 J U D G M E N T A.M. Khanwilkar, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS S.NO. TOPIC PARAS 1. Introduction 1 2. Objectives of the Project 2-10 3. Proceedings and Contentions of the 11-123 Parties Consideration 4. Rule of Law 124-135 5. Democratic Due Process and 136-158 Judicial Review 6. Need for Heightened Judicial 159-167 Review 7. Constitutionalism 168-172 8. Participatory Democracy in India 173-198 9. Change in Land Use 199 a) What is Master Plan and Zonal 200-202 Plan. b) Modification of Plans 203-228 c) Procedure before decision 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use decision 274-275 2 10. CVC Clearance a) Status of CVC and Procedure 276-287 Adopted for Grant of “No Objection” b) Non-application of mind 288-295 c) Legitimate Expectation 296-298 11. DUAC Approval a) Stage for Statutory Approval by 299-306 DUAC b) Arbitrariness in Grant of 307-312 Approval 12. Challenge to Change in Land Use in 313-325 Reference to Heritage Conservation 13. Scope of Development on Heritage 326-332 Sites (Prior Approval vis-à-vis Prior Permission) 14. Environmental Clearance (EC) 333-368 15. Merits Review by NGT 369-382 16. Consultation Services NIT a) Selection Process 383-397 b) Design/Concept Competition 398-400 17. Public Trust 401-407 18. Availability of Information in Public 408-410 Domain 19. Preliminary Objection in I.A. 411-419 20. Postlude 420-422 21. Conclusion and Order 423-425 3 INTRODUCTION 1. By these petition(s)/appeal(s)/case(s), we are called upon by the petitioners to undertake a comprehensive and heightened judicial scrutiny regarding the permissibility of the Central Vista Project1 of the Government of India. Diverse issues concerning the decisions taken by the statutory Authorities including regarding the change in land use, grant of statutory and other permissions, environmental as well as heritage clearances etc., have been raised in these proceedings. The challenge is premised on high principles of democratic values as applicable in India and not limited to mere infringement of statutory provisions of the governing enactments. That is on account of the nature of project – being of high political significance and eminence for our democratic republic; and for upholding the “Rule of Law”, which is on a higher pedestal than the governance by “Rule by Law”. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT 2. As per the policy documents, the need for the development of the Project is rooted in the creation of a larger working space for efficient functioning of the highest legislative wing of the 1 For short, “the Project” 4 country and for integrated administrative block for Ministries/Departments presently spread out at different locations including on rental basis. 3. The Parliament House building, a Grade-I heritage structure, was commissioned in 1927 and stands as a 93 years old structure today. The structure has been subjected to various modifications in the post-independence period so as to maintain its functionality as per changing requirements. Post 1971 census wherein the total population of India was recorded as 548,159,6521, the number of seats for the House of People was fixed at 545. Today, the population has spiralled exponentially and is stated to have crossed the 130-crore mark. The next delimitation exercise, proposed to take place in 2026, is bound to result in a substantial increase in the total number of seats in both the Houses. Accordingly, enhanced and commensurate spatial requirements ought to be in place. 4. The present Central Hall has a seating capacity of only 440 persons. That already falls short of the present need to accommodate members of both Houses together during a joint session. Presently, there is no scope to expand the existing Central Hall. Resultantly, the Joint Sessions of both the Houses 5 of Parliament are conducted by way of a makeshift arrangement in the Central Hall causing inconvenience to the members attending official functions thereat, apart from undermining their dignity. Furthermore, the structure falls short of fire, water and electrical safety norms and poses a grave security risk for the legislators and secretariat staff. 5. In order to address the concerns stated above, the Central Government decided to construct a new Parliament building with a futuristic approach and the House of People being 3 times the size of the present chamber. That along with the present Parliament building and Annexe attached therewith, would be referred to as the Parliament Complex. It is further proposed that all the 51 Ministries of the Central Government be housed in 10 buildings within an integrated complex marked with underground transit connectivity and structural identity. Expressing the need for urgent completion of the project, it has been stated that the new Parliament shall symbolize the 75th Independence Day of the country in 2022 as well as the Global G- 20 Summit to be hosted by India in the same year. The objectives, as stated in the written submissions of the respondents, succinctly read thus: 6 “(i) A new Parliament Building with space and technology to meet the present and emerging needs of vibrant Indian democracy. (ii) Common Central Secretariat with all Ministries in a single location for efficiency and synergy in functioning. (iii) Central Vista to be redeveloped as a world class public space and venue for national and international events.” 6. Similar structural defects, along with acute shortage of office spaces, have been pointed out in the offices of various Ministries presently spread across 47 buildings in the Central Vista region and in particular, Central Secretariat block. It is stated that various buildings housing the Ministries, including North Block and South Block, are ill-equipped to meet even the basic fire and earthquake safety norms and require regular upgradations involving recurring expenses to the tune of Rs.50 crores annually. As per Non-Availability Certificates (NACs) issued by Directorate of Estate, a shortage of 3.8 lakh sq.m. of office space has been flagged. To add to this state of affairs, the Central Government is spending an amount equivalent to about Rs.1,000 crores on rental spaces to accommodate the offices of various Ministries annually. The proposal states thus: “Most of the buildings in the Central Vista area are more than 40-50 years old and have either outlived or approaching their structural lives. Further buildings constructed over 100 years ago such as North and South Block are not earthquake safe. There is shortage of working spaces, parking amenities and services. The 7 spread of Central Government Ministries and Departments in different locations leads to inefficiencies and difficulty in coordination.” 7. Upon examination of other documents associated with the Project, the objectives for redeveloping/constructing the existing Central Secretariat have been broadly summed up thus: (i) Even after 73 years of independence, the nation does not have a common secretariat building. Some Ministries are housed in Central Vista complex while some Ministries are housed in other parts of Delhi; (ii) Various Ministries, due to lack of available space, have hired premises on rent and till date most of the rent paid for and on behalf of the Central Government for using its Ministries in Delhi runs into thousands of crores; (iii) Except North Block and South Block and one or two other buildings, rest of the buildings are not heritage buildings and are constructed in the near vicinity based upon the need; (iv) Most of the existing buildings have outlived its structural life and are not earthquake resistant; (v) As there is no common Central Secretariat and Ministries are spread over different locations, the resultant effect is administrative inefficiency and difficulty in inter-departmental coordination; 8 (vi) This also leads to travelling, resulting into traffic congestion and pollution; (vii) Existing secretariat buildings spread all over haphazardly, suffering from poor servicing, inefficient use of land, inadequate facilities and outdated infrastructure; (viii) There are six plots on Central Vista, which houses temporary barracks or stable building during 2nd World War occupying 90 acres of land, which has remained underutilised; (ix) To utilise the underutilised spaces in the Central Vista region; (x) Integrated functioning of all offices of the Central Government; (xi) Modernisation of Government work spaces for enhanced productivity and efficient management of human resources; (xi) To promote the concept of green buildings commensurate with scientific standards and sustainable with the needs of future generations; and (xiii) To connect all the ministerial offices through an underground shuttle transportation system for smooth performance of routine administrative functions. 9 8. As regards the decision to supplement the existing Parliament building (on plot No. 116
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lodi Garden-A Historical Detour
    Aditya Singh Rathod Subject: Soicial Science] [I.F. 5.761] Vol. 8, Issue: 6, June: 2020 International Journal of Research in Humanities & Soc. Sciences ISSN:(P) 2347-5404 ISSN:(O)2320 771X Lodi Garden-A Historical Detour ADITYA SINGH RATHOD Department of History University of Delhi, Delhi Lodi Garden, as a closed complex comprises of several architectural accomplishments such as tombs of Muhammad Shah and Sikandar Lodi, Bara Gumbad, Shish Gumbad (which is actually tomb of Bahlul Lodi), Athpula and many nameless mosque, however my field work primarily focuses upon the monuments constructed during the Lodi period. This term paper attempts to situate these monuments in the context of their socio-economic and political scenario through assistance of Waqiat-i-Mushtaqui and tries to traverse beyond the debate of sovereignty, which they have been confined within all these years. Village of Khairpur was the location of some of the tombs, mosques and other structures associated with the Lodi period, however in 1936; villagers were deported out of this space to lay the foundation of a closed campus named as Lady Willingdon Park, in the commemoration of erstwhile viceroy’s wife; later which was redesigned by eminent architect, J A Stein and was renamed as Lodi Garden in 1968. Its proximity to the Dargah of Shaykh Nizamuddin Auliya delineated Sufi jurisdiction over this space however, in due course of time it came under the Shia influence as Aliganj located nearby to it, houses monuments subscribing to this sect, such as Gateway of Old Karbala and Imambara; even the tomb of a powerful Shia Mughal governor i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Princely Palaces in New Delhi Datasheet
    TITLE INFORMATION Tel: +1 212 645 1111 Email: [email protected] Web: https://www.accartbooks.com/us Princely Palaces In New Delhi Sumanta K Bhowmick ISBN 9789383098910 Publisher Niyogi Books Binding Hardback Territory USA & Canada Size 9.18 in x 10.39 in Pages 264 Pages Price $75.00 The first-ever comprehensive book on the princely palaces in New Delhi Documentation based on extensive archival research and interviews with royal families Text supported by priceless photographs obtained from the private collections of the princely states, National Archives of India, state archives and various other government and private bodies Rajas and maharajas from all over the British Indian Empire congregated in Delhi to attend the great Delhi Durbar of 1911. A new capital city was born New Delhi. Soon after, the princely states came up with elaborate palaces in the new Imperial capital Hyderabad House, Baroda House, Jaipur House, Bikaner House, Patiala House, to name a few. Why did the British government allot prime land to the princely states and how? How did the construction come up and under whose architectural design? Who occupied these palaces and what were the events held? What happened to these palatial buildings after the integration of the states with the Indian Republic? This book delineates the story behind the story, documenting history through archival research, interviews with royalty and unpublished photographs from royal private collections. Contents: Foreword; The Journey; Living with History; Hyderabad House- Guests of Honour; Baroda House - Butterfly on the Track; Bikaner House -Rajasthan Royals; Jaipur House -An Acre of Art; Patiala House -Chambers of Justice; Travancore House -Hathiwali Kothi; Darbhanga House - The 'Twain Shall Meet; The Other Palaces - Scattered Petals; Planning the Palaces -Thy Will be Done; List of Princely Palaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Statistics of Delhi
    BASIC STATISTICS OF DELHI Page No. 1. Names of colonies/properties, structures and gates in Eighteenth Century 2 1.1 Sheet No.1 Plan of the City of Delhi 2 1.2 Sheet No.2 Plan of the City of Delhi 2 1.3 Sheet No.5 Plan of the City of Delhi 3 1.4 Sheet No.7 Plan of the City of Delhi 3 1.5 Sheet No.8 Plan of the City of Delhi 3 1.6 Sheet No.9 Plan of the City of Delhi 3 1.7 Sheet No.11 Plan of the City of Delhi 3 1.8 Sheet No.12 Plan of the City of Delhi 4 2. List of built up residential areas prior to 1962 4 3. Industrial areas in Delhi since 1950’s. 5 4. Commercial Areas 6 5. Residential Areas – Plotted & Group Housing Residential colonies 6 6. Resettlement Colonies 7 7. Transit Camps constructed by DDA 7 8. Tenements constructed by DDA/other bodies for Slum Dwellers 7 9. Group Housing constructed by DDA in Urbanized Villages including on 8 their peripheries up to 1980’s 10. Colonies developed by Ministry of Rehabilitation 8 11. Residential & Industrial Development with the help of Co-op. 8 House Building Societies (Plotted & Group Housing) 12. Institutional Areas 9 13. Important Stadiums 9 14. Important Ecological Parks & other sites 9 15. Integrated Freight Complexes-cum-Wholesale markets 9 16. Gaon Sabha Land in Delhi 10 17. List of Urban Villages 11 18. List of Rural Villages 19. List of 600 Regularized Unauthorized colonies 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Rashtrapati Bhavan and the Central Vista.Pdf
    RASHTRAPATI BHAVAN and the Central Vista © Sondeep Shankar Delhi is not one city, but many. In the 3,000 years of its existence, the many deliberations, decided on two architects to design name ‘Delhi’ (or Dhillika, Dilli, Dehli,) has been applied to these many New Delhi. Edwin Landseer Lutyens, till then known mainly as an cities, all more or less adjoining each other in their physical boundary, architect of English country homes, was one. The other was Herbert some overlapping others. Invaders and newcomers to the throne, anxious Baker, the architect of the Union buildings at Pretoria. to leave imprints of their sovereign status, built citadels and settlements Lutyens’ vision was to plan a city on lines similar to other great here like Jahanpanah, Siri, Firozabad, Shahjahanabad … and, capitals of the world: Paris, Rome, and Washington DC. Broad, long eventually, New Delhi. In December 1911, the city hosted the Delhi avenues flanked by sprawling lawns, with impressive monuments Durbar (a grand assembly), to mark the coronation of King George V. punctuating the avenue, and the symbolic seat of power at the end— At the end of the Durbar on 12 December, 1911, King George made an this was what Lutyens aimed for, and he found the perfect geographical announcement that the capital of India was to be shifted from Calcutta location in the low Raisina Hill, west of Dinpanah (Purana Qila). to Delhi. There were many reasons behind this decision. Calcutta had Lutyens noticed that a straight line could connect Raisina Hill to become difficult to rule from, with the partition of Bengal and the Purana Qila (thus, symbolically, connecting the old with the new).
    [Show full text]
  • Centrespread Centrespread 15 JULY 30-AUGUST 05, 2017 All the JULY 30-AUGUST 05, 2017
    14 centrespread centrespread 15 JULY 30-AUGUST 05, 2017 All The JULY 30-AUGUST 05, 2017 takes you through ET Magazine Presidents’On Tuesday, Ram Nath Kovind moved in as the 14th President Houses to occupy Rashtrapati Bhawan, the official residence of the Indian President. the history and the peoplepresidential behind palacesthe palatial around residence, the world: and a glimpse into other :: Indulekha Aravind Presidential Residences Around The World ELYSEE PALACE, PARIS The official residence of the President of Rashtrapati Bhawan: A Brief History France since 1848, Elysee Palace was opened Cast Of Characters the building to move construction materials and subsoil water in 1722. An example of the French Classical pumped to the surface for all water requirements. style, it has 356 rooms spread over Edwin Lutyens and Herbert Baker 11,179 sq m n 1911, during the Delhi Durbar, it was decided that British The bulk of the land belonged to the then-maharaja of Jaipur, were the architects of the Viceroy’s India’s capital would be shifted from Calcutta to Delhi. With Sawai Madho Singh II, who gifted the 145-ft Jaipur Column to House and it was Lutyens who conceived THE WHITE HOUSE, the new capital, a new imperial residence also had to be the British to commemorate the creation of Delhi as the new the H-shaped building I WASHINGTON DC found. The original choice was Kingsway Camp in the north but capital. Though the initial idea was to finish the construction The home of the US President is spread it was rejected after experts said the region was at the risk of in four years, it finally took more than 17 years to complete, across six levels, with 132 rooms The main building was constructed under the supervision of flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • To View the Public Initiative
    _______________________________________________________________________________________ INDIAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Delhi Chapter 6th Floor, Radisson Suites, Sushant Lok-I, Sector 27, Gurgaon-122002, Haryana Ph. 91-124- 4018123, 9810292967 REPORT ON THE “LUTYENS BUNGALOW ZONE (LBZ) - BOUNDARY AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES DUAC (DELHI URBAN ARTS COMMISSION), JULY 2015) OBJECTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS BY INDIAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS (ISOLA) DELHI CHAPTER The Indian Society of Landscape Architects (ISOLA) Delhi Chapter has reviewed the Report on Lutyens Bungalow Zone- Boundary and Development Guidelines”, submitted to the Ministry of Urban Development (Delhi Division), and issued for inviting objections/suggestions on 28th August, 2015. We, ISOLA Delhi Chapter, submit the following observations and objections to the report, prepared by DUAC for due consideration, through a landscape heritage perspective. As per the new Guidelines the character of the LBZ would change dramatically (to its detriment), with significant impact on the environment and character of Central Delhi. We would like to highlight the lack of consideration in the report to the Landscape Heritage of New Delhi. This includes the planned ‘Garden City’ planning as designed in 1930 as well as the landscape resource this area is today. LBZ needs to be conserved for the future, not only for its historic planning, but significantly its model landscape planning design; strategic planting; mature, verdant and diverse canopy (which took nearly a century to be established); and, the critical biodiversity it supports. Depriving the people of Delhi of the green lung that LBZ is today, will lead to further deterioration of the poor air quality that is plaguing our capital city. We as ISOLA Delhi Chapter strongly object to the LBZ Boundary and Development Guidelines Report by DUAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Delhi Assembly Election 2015 District-Wise & Ac-Wise List of Nominated Candidates S
    DELHI ASSEMBLY ELECTION 2015 DISTRICT-WISE & AC-WISE LIST OF NOMINATED CANDIDATES S. Cand. Candidate Name Party Name & District No. Assembly No. & Age/ Address No. S.No. Abbrevation & Name Name Sex 1 1 AJAY MUDGIL Independent (IND) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 30/M 1215, PANA PAPOSIYAN NARELA DELHI DELHI 2 2 SURENDER Communist Party of India 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 48/M 73/6, Gali Mata, Vishwakarma Road, (Marxist-Leninist) Pana Udyan, Narela, Delhi. (Liberation) (CPI(ML)(L)) Delhi 3 3 SHARAD KUMAR Aam Aadmi Party (AAAP) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 40/M 123, BHUMIYA CHOWK, VILLAGE BAKOLI DELHI-110036 DELHI 4 4 ROOPESH Bahujan Samaj Party 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 40/M 189,MAIN BAZAR, PANA UYDAN (BSP) NARELA DELHI-110040 DELHI 5 5 MANOJ KUMAR Independent (IND) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 42/M 345, POCKET-4 SECTOR-A-6 NARELA DELHI 6 6 PARVENDER KUMAR Independent (IND) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 36/M 2015, SABZI MANDI WALI GALI VILLAGE ALIPUR DELHI-110036 DELHI 7 7 BRIJ MOHAN Shivsena (SHS) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 37/M 59, VILLAGE GHOGA NARELA DELHI-110040 DELHI 8 8 SHARAD KUMAR Aam Aadmi Party (AAAP) 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 40/M 123, BHUMIYA CHOWK, VILLAGE BAKOLI DELHI-110036 DELHI 9 9 NEELDAMAN KHATRI Bharatiya Janata Party 1-NORTH WEST 1-NERELA 44/M 1619, CHADAI WALI GALI PANA (BJP) MAMUR PUR NARELA DELHI-110040 DELHI Page 1 of Pages 148 DELHI ASSEMBLY ELECTION 2015 DISTRICT-WISE & AC-WISE LIST OF NOMINATED CANDIDATES S. Cand. Candidate Name Party Name & District No.
    [Show full text]
  • List of MLA Contact Details
    7th Delhi Legislative Assembly AC AC MEMBERS ADDRESS CONTACT EMAIL ID NO. NAME S.Sh./Smt./Ms. DETAILS 1 NARELA Sharad Kumar H.No.123, Bhumiya Chowk, 8687686868 [email protected] Chauhan Village Bakoli, Delhi-36 9555484848 [email protected] 9818892004 2 BURARI Sanjeev Jha House No.09, Gali No.-11, 9953456787 [email protected] Pepsi Road, A2 Block, West 8588833505 Sant Nagar, Burari, Delhi-84 3 TIMARPUR Dilip Pandey Tower-B, 607, Dronagiri 9999696388 [email protected] Apartment, Sector-11, Near 7428281491 Parashuram Chowk Vasundhara, Ghaziabad 4 ADARSH Pawan Sharma A-13, Gali No.-36, 8588833404 [email protected] NAGAR Mahendra Park, Delhi-33 9811139625 5 BADLI Ajesh Yadav 56, Laxmi Kunj, Sector-13, 9958833979 [email protected] Rohini, Delhi-85 9990919797 27557375 6 RITHALA Mohinder Goyal 19, Swastik Kunj 9312658803 [email protected] Apartment., Sector-13, 9711332458 Rohini, Delhi-85 9810496182 7 BAWANA (SC) Jai Bhagwan C-290-91, Pucca Shahabad 9312282081 [email protected] Dairy, Delhi-42 9717921052 8 MUNDKA Dharampal Lakra C-29, New Multan Nagar, 9811866113 [email protected] New Delhi-56 8130099300 9 KIRARI Rituraj Govind B-19, Block,-B, Pratap Vihar, 9899564895 [email protected] Part-III, Gali No. 10, Kirari 9999654895 Suleman nagar, Delhi-86 10 SULTANPUR Mukesh Ahlawat WZ-43, Begum Pur 9990968261 [email protected] MAJRA (SC) Extension, Mangal Bazar 9250668261 Road, New Delhi-86 11 NANGLOI JAT Raghuvinder M-449, Guru Harkishan 9811011925 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN RAILWAY Delhi Division Commercial Branch DRM Office State Entry Road New Delhi 110055
    NORTHERN RAILWAY Delhi Division Commercial Branch DRM Office State Entry Road New Delhi 110055 Invitation of application for authorization of “Jan Sadharan Ticket Booking Sewak” (JTBS) at various locations over Delhi Division, Northern Railway. The Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager, Northern Railway, New Delhi for and on behalf of President of India invites applications up to 23.06.2015 for selection and short listing of “Jan Sadharan Ticket Booking Sewak” (JTBS) at various locations over Delhi Division, Northern Railway for issuing of unreserved Rail tickets through computerized Unreserved Ticketing System (UTS), from interested parties fulfilling following conditions and such conditions as may be prescribed from time to time. Licenses for total 156 numbers of JTBS at 69 locations as per quota distribution as detailed here under are proposed to be issued: SN Name of the Station Station No. of Gen S.C. S.T. OBC MIN FF/WW PMCP Code JTBS /WRE Required 1 ADARSH NAGAR ANDI 2 1 1 2 ANAND VIHAR TERMINAL ANVT 3 1 1 1 3 ASAOTI AST 2 1 1 4 BADLI BHD 2 1 1 5 BAGHPAT ROAD BPM 2 1 1 6 BAHADURGARH BGZ 2 1 1 7 BALLABGARH BVH 2 1 1 8 BARAUT BTU 2 1 1 9 BIJWASAN BWSN 2 1 1 10 BUDHLADA BLZ 2 1 1 11 DAYA BASTI DBSI 2 1 1 12 DELHI AZADPUR DAZ 2 1 1 13 DELHI CANTT. DEC 2 2 14 DELHI JN. DLI 5 2 1 1 1 15 DELHI KISHANGANJ DKZ 2 1 1 16 DELHI SADAR BAZAR DSB 2 1 1 17 DELHI SARAI ROHILLA DEE 5 2 1 1 1 18 DELHI SHAHADRA DSA 5 3 1 1 19 DEOBAND DBD 2 1 1 20 FARIDABAD FDB 2 1 1 21 FARIDABAD NEW TOWN FDN 2 1 1 22 GANAUR GNU 2 1 1 23 GARHI HARSARU GHH 2 1 1 24 GHAZIABAD GZB 5 2 1 2 25 GOHANA GHNA 2 1 1 Page 1 of 6 26 GURGAON GGN 2 1 1 27 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Taken for Granted by Many and Cherished by a Few, the Trees in India’S Capital City Make It Seem Like a Verse from a Ruskin Bond Poem
    Nature Trails A garden of dreams Taken for granted by many and cherished by a few, the trees in India’s capital city make it seem like a verse from a Ruskin Bond poem. TexT & phoTographs YD BAR-NESS elhi? Think human traffic and clogged roads, jangled nerves and rampant drivers, and a slice of pollution to top it all off. Like most of us, you appreciate green and quiet places, trees and wildlife. The Dcapital city might seem a tad bit overwhelming during your first visit, but here’s introducing its green and forested side. With a bit of an adventurous streak, you can escape the crowds and noise and find some The giant semal tree near unique natural attractions. Sikander’s Tomb gates, Lodhi Gardens. 66•JetWings•January 2010 NatureTrails When these khirni trees were seedlings perhaps 500 years ago, the Mughals were only just getting established in Delhi. There are not only several remarkable and special trees, but also surprisingly large and peaceful forestlands within the vast, bustling city of Delhi. Treat yourself to a natural adventure within the capital and reconnect for a bit with the wild earth. INTO THE WOODS Delhi was built where a blade of ancient sandstone reaches towards the Yamuna river. Most of this slightly higher area of land is covered by city now, but a handful of large forest areas remain. In the south of the city you can visit sanjay Van for a respite from the relentlessly urban environment. The forest has changed dramatically over the years, especially due to a Mexican acacia tree gone rampant.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been Used to Photo­ Graph and Reproduce This Manuscript from the Microfilm Master
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6" X 9" black and w h itephotographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Accessing the World'sUMI Information since 1938 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8824569 The architecture of Firuz Shah Tughluq McKibben, William Jeffrey, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 Copyright ©1988 by McKibben, William Jeflfrey. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
    HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH WEDNESDAY,THE 18 JULY,2012 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 TO 40 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 41 TO 42 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 43 TO 55 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL / 56 TO 70 REGISTRAR (ORGL.) / REGISTRAR (ADMN.) / JOINT REGISTRARS (ORGL.) 18.07.2012 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 18.07.2012 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS ______________________________ 1. CM APPL. 8481/2012 VIJAY SAI REDDY SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (CM For Restoration)In W.P Vs. UOI AND ORS .(C) 8691/2011 (Disposed-off Case) 2. W.P.(C) 3146/2012 JOSE ABRAHAM RITU KUMAR Vs. GOVT OF NCT AND ORS 3. W.P.(C) 3157/2012 MS. M.FATIMA ALVI AWANISH Vs. MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE KUMAR,N.WAZIRI,A.SIDDIQUI ANGLO ARABIC SENION SECONDARY SCHOOL 4. W.P.(C) 3416/2012 ANTAR RASHTRIYA MANAV SHOBHA CM APPL. 7228/2012 ADHIKAAR NIGRAANI PARISHAD Vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 5. W.P.(C) 3789/2012 RAJENDRA KUMAR KESHAV KAUSHIK,ROHINI MUSA CM APPL. 7944/2012 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 6. W.P.(C) 3837/2012 GAURAV KUMAR BANSAL PETITIONER IN PERSON Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION _______________ 7. W.P.(C) 8889/2011 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION THRU MAIL,SHOBHNA TAKKIAR Vs. DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT (Disposed-off Case) 8.
    [Show full text]