The Wiswesser-Loschmidt Connection *
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ll, t. Chem. 22 (1998) 2 j THE WISWESSER-LOSCHMIDT CONNECTION * Alfrd dr, Ml, WI Wll ph Wr (48 [. ] rd td fr hh Unvrt th .S. n htr n 6 nd rvd n hnrr .S. fr tht ntt tn n 4. pld b rl, th rjn dr Cpn, th tnn Arnl, th Cpr Unn, Wlln rdt, th U.S. Ar t rt tr, nd fnll b th Arltrl rh Srv f th U.S..A., n ntrtd thrht h vrd rr n plfn hl trtr drptn, h d vlpd th Wr n ttn (W, hh d pbl th nlln dptn f vr l l, n ttr h pltd. rh rnz r 2. Josef Loschmidt tn n th 80 hd lln f W rrd n thr ptr. h Aldrh Chl Cpn vn f frd t tl n W. Wr lrnd bt th hl r f f hdt (828 [. 2] fr Mrtz Khn ppr n th Journal of Chemical Education (1), hh bd n hrd Anhütz ppr (2 nd rprnt ( f hdt 86 vl (4. flt tht h hd d rt rdvr, l blvn tht th ht br ht th frrnnr f th W nd h ntd th rld t n bt t. r I. Wll . Wr 22 Bull. Hist. Chem. 22 (1998) He submitted a manuscript to the present author (A.B.) he had been invited, and then at chemical society meet- for the Aldrichimica Acta, which at the time was being ings and in chemistry departments, and finally by pub- distributed to over 200,000 scientists worldwide. Al- lishing several papers (7). All of these lectures and pa- though the initial response was one of reluctance, I be- pers were based on Wiswesser's seminal paper in the came enthusiastic about the subject after reading Aldrichimica Acta (5). I have been greatly helped in Loschmidt's book (3) and some letters, in particular one these efforts by Professor Christian R. Noe, formerly at by Wiswesser to Linus Pulling (see Ref. 16), and col- Loschmidt's alma mater, the Technical University in laborated to expand the paper, which appeared in Vienna, and now at the J.W. Goethe University in Frank- Aldrichimica Acta in 1989 (5). furt. Wiswesser described Loschmidt's chemical firsts: Our papers have been attacked quite sharply by two 1. The first correct cyclic structure of benzene and historians of chemistry, Professors A.J. Rocke (8) and of many aromatic chemicals, 121 in all. G.P. Schiemenz (9). Rocke presents three main argu- 2. The first representation of the allyl moiety. ments: 3. The first representation of the vinyl moiety and (1) "Loschmidt clearly believed that the most prob- of many others. able structure for benzene (Schema 182) was a 4. The first representation of cyclopropane, 21 formula constructed from multiple fused years before it was made by Freund. cyclopropyl rings, using only single bonds. (8)" 5. The first picture book of molecules, containing graphic displays with atomic domains, rather than abstract bond lines. 6. The first double- and triple-bond marks (within the overlaps). 7. The first realistic displays of atomic sizes and bond distances (largest overlap with triple bonds). Sh 82 8. The first set of diagrams with correct C = 12, N = 14, O = 16 formulas. However, all of Loschmidt's more than 100 aro- 9. The first textbook use of atomic-group symbols. matic compounds are based on Schema 185 as the basic 10. The first use of the valence prime marks on benzene structure. these and atomic symbols ("Valenz" was intro- duced by Wichelhaus in 1868, 7 years later). 11. The first LINE-FORMULA NOTATIONS ("ra- tional formulas"). 12. The first revelations of hexavalent and tetrava- lent sulfur. Sh 8 The article also outlined Loschmidt's life and work, based largely on the biography Richard Anschütz pub- lished with the 1913 reprint. Wiswesser also prepared (2 "... Kekulé himself did not recognize Loschmidt indices of Loschmidt and Anschütz citations, by author as a predecessor for the benzene structure be- and subject. He translated Loschmidt's chemical names cause he cited Loschmidt's benzene proposal into English and collated structures with page numbers. in his first paper on the subject. If Kekulé had On the occasion of our last meeting in Reading, consciously taken the idea for benzene from this PA, Wiswesser gave me a great deal of his material on obscure source, or regarded the Loschmidt Loschmidt, even copies of the original plates, which he structure as similar to his own, the last thing he had hand-colored Expressing concern about his own would have wanted to do was to draw attention failing health, he urged me to continue his work on to it. (8)" Loschmidt. I remember his pleasure upon receiving the Kekulé did not "cite" Loschmidt's proposal. All Acta containing his article, just a few days before he he said in one footnote in French (10) and one in Ger- died. man (11) was, "I prefer my structure to those of Since then, I have been trying to continue his work, Loschmidt and Crum Brown." Aside from these deni- by giving many lectures, first at the Boston American 0grating 0 footnotes - not citations - and one brief abstract Chemical Society meeting in April 1990 (6), to which (12), there were no references to Loschmidt's book in Bull. Hist. Chem. 22 (1998) 23 the entire 19th century. Rocke points to the Dictionary This misunderstanding that Loschmidt's benzene of Scientific Biography, where more space is devoted to structures might symbolize a monocyclic formula was Loschmidt than to Kekulé. Loschmidt was indeed well already discussed by E. Rey in 1965, who aptly com- known in the 19th century, but as a physicist, not a chem- mented that one must lnterpret the circular symbol as what it really means and not as what it could be, ist. Not until Anschütz's first paper (2) was Loschmidt and hence not as a circular array of six carbon atoms. recognized as a highly competent chemist. The argument also holds true for all of Loschmidt's (3) "Even if Loschmidt had suggested a cyclical formulae (by the way, there were not 386!) which benzene structure in 1861, I would argue for its may have some superficial resemblance with mod- insignificance, because no empirical evidence em molecular models. To date molecular modeling could then be adduced to support the idea. (8)" back to I861 is just anachronistic. This is the kind of argument that can be made Schiemenz's English summary of his longest paper states against much purely theoretical work. (9c): Schiemenz criticized Wiswesser inter alia for claim- ing that Loschmidt was the first to consider a 6-carbon In 1989, W. J. Wiswesser claimed that the correct, monocyclic structure for benzene, and also for stating monocyclic structure of benzene was not conceived that Loschmidt's book of 1861 was practically unknown in 1865 by A. Kekulé, but already in 1861 by J. and that he was "a shy and self-effacing man." Loschmidt. It is shown that this view is neither cor- rect nor new. As a symbol for the benzene nucleus "Die Idee einer monocyclischen Anordnung der sechs C 6 , Loschmidt used a circle which Wiswesser be- C-Atome des Benzols kommt nach allem bei lieved to stand for a cyclic array of the six carbon Loschmidt auch nicht andeutungsweise vor. (9a, 9c)" atoms. In fact, this circle represents, in the two-di- ("hr thr n hdt b vn th mensionality of the printed page, a sphere. Similar, lhtt hnt f nl rrnnt f th 6 but smaller 'circles' (.. spheres) represent hydro- rbn t n bnzn."( gen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur atoms. Their sizes are chosen so that the volumes of the corre- But consider the following structures to represent aro- sponding spheres reflect the respective atomic matic compounds aniline, benezenesulfonic acid, ben- weights (72 for C 6). This meaning soon passed into zoic acid, and cinnamic acid. oblivion. As a consequence, gradually a misinter- pretation developed which culminated in Wiswesser's view which recently has been popularized by C.R Noe and A. Bader. The most telling indication that Loschmidt thought of a monocyclic structure is in his Schema 229 for p-phe- nylenediamine (13): Aniline nznlfn Ad Shn dr Anbl d Sh zt d Mölht vn rn Mdftnn. ["Just looking at Schema 229 shows the possibility of isomeric modi- fications."] Sh 22 Cnn Ad Schiemenz counters (9d): Auch eine Anmerkung hdt zum In a letter to Chemistry and Industry, Schiemenz wrote 'Semibenzidam'='Azophenylamin' (9b): (Phenylendiamin), Schema 229, gehört hierher: 'Schon der Anblick des Schema zeigt die Möglichkeit 24 Bull. Hist. Chem. 22 (1998) von isomeren Modificationen' (Loschmidt (1861), wir Isomerie im engern Shine nennen. Solche 34). Entgegen der Auffassung von Noe and Bader Isomerie findet statt zwischen Milchsäure und (Chemistry in Britain 29 (1993) 402, Corrigendum: Paramilchsäure, zwischen Alphatoluolsäure und S.573; vlg, dies., in Wotiz (1993), 233) einer Inter- Betatoluolsäure. Die anderen Arten der Isomerie pretation als o-, m-, p- Positionsisomerie noch nicht im weiteren Sinne sind: erstens jene Fälle, wo zwei zugänglich (Anschütz (1913), I32), kann diese Substanzen denselben Kern und dieselben Aufsatz- Bemerkung nur im Sinne einer Konstitutionsisomerie Atome haben, wo aber die letzteren zu anderen verstanden werden (vgl. Loschmidt (1861): Isomerie, Aufsatzelementen gruppiert sind. So haben S.8-1I). Mithin muß bereits Loschmidt, der anderswo Nitrotoluol und Benzaminsäure [i.e., aminobenzoic N-N- und auch 0-0-Bindungen hat (Schema acid] nicht nur dieselbe Zusammenstellung C 7NH7O 2 , 176,178), an die Atomverknüpfung des Phenylhydrazins sondern auch denselben Kern C 7VIII und dieselben gedacht haben. Aufsatzatome NH 7 O 2 ." [Emphasis added] Thus, Schiemenz dismisses this argument by claiming Schiemenz points out that Loschmidt did think of six- that Loschmidt must have been thinking of an isomer atom monocycles such as his Schema 237, 1,4- like phenylhydrazine (which had not yet been made).