Evidence of John Godfried Vannisselroy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evidence of John Godfried Vannisselroy Before a Board of Inquiry Transmission Gully Notices of Requirement and Consent Applications Under: The Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of: Notices of requirement for designations and resource consent applications by the NZ Transport Agency, Porirua City Council and Transpower New Zealand Limited for the Transmission Gully Proposal Between: NZ Transport Agency Requiring Authority and Applicant And: Porirua City Council Local Authority and Applicant And: Transpower New Zealand Limited Applicant Evidence of John Godfried Vannisselroy 1 _________________________________________________________________ QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE 1. My full name is John Godfried Vannisselroy. 2. I am providing this evidence as an expert in rail design for passenger operations. 3. I have 39 years experience in the rail industry – including design, construction and operation of railway vehicles. I originally trained in coachbuilding, then worked in rolling stock design, and am now employed by KiwiRail as a Locomotive Engineer driving electric multiple units. I have also been actively involved in the Rail and Maritime Transport Union, providing analysis of ways to improve the quality of the Wellington commuter rail system. As a locomotive engineer, I have an intimate knowledge of the Wellington system. 4. I have read the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses as contained in the Environment Court Consolidated Practice Note (2011) and agree to abide by it. SCOPE OF EVIDENCE 5. I have been asked to provide evidence on changes that could be made to fixed infrastructure (i.e. tracks, signals, stations, signage and other infrastructure, rather than rolling stock and operational systems) on the Kapiti Line, that would: 5.1. allow a reduction in factors the adversely effect service delivery and therefore the ability of the rail system to attract users 2 5.2. and thereby potentially counteract the predicted traffic induction effect of Transmission Gully, particularly the predicted modal shift of some current rail users to the new road1. “MORE ATTRACTIVE SERVICE” AND DEMAND What constitutes a “more attractive service”? 6 Based on surveys of passengers and rail service planning work done in recent years, I have adopted the following as the key determinants of service quality that are relevant to fixed infrastructure. 6.1 Availability of services that meet the needs. 6.2 Frequency of services. 6.3 Transit times, taking into account transit times for train services, time spent waiting (determined by service frequency), and time needed to get to the service. 6.4 Comfort (particularly at stations). 6.5 Safety (particularly at stations, but also on routes leading to stations). 6.6 Adequacy of park and ride facilities (taking into account availability of alternatives such as feeder bus services). 6.7 Legibility of the system (i.e. the ability of passengers to know what services are running, and how to use them). 6.8 There are other key determinants that are not dependent on fixed infrastructure, such as the quality of rail vehicles and the service provided by operating staff. Effects of service quality on demand 7 My personal experience working in the rail system, and the research I have seen, suggests that: 7.1 There is a group of rail users whose modal choice and frequency of journeys is unaffected by quality. They will generally be users who have no 1 AEE, p 246. I have not been able to find precise figures for this expected modal shift. An analysis of likely numbers is in my view important. Train services are communal, so if a change makes a service less economic that can have impacts on the service or the overall system, and therefore other passengers’ transport options. 3 other choices, but it includes those who have no deadlines and are therefore not seriously affected by delays. 7.2 There is a group of private car users who are very unlikely to ever use rail, unless they have no choice. Nevertheless, the effect of the Supergold Card would suggest that group may be smaller than has been estimated in some modelling. 7.3 Between the two groups above are many users and potential users who will make major changes in their modal choice, for some or all journeys, depending on their circumstances and the services they are offered. It is that group which is most sensitive to changes in quality. 7.4 Improving comfort levels is unlikely on its own to generate major behavioural change; although there is evidence that the introduction of new rolling stock will attract new users to the system. For example: the introduction of the then new Ganz-Mavag electric multiple units in the early 1980s resulted in a 14% increase in patronage, and a similar increase can be expected with the current introduction of new electric multiple units from Rotem. 7.5 New levels of service (e.g. new stations, significantly increased frequency) has generated measurable modal shift to rail (and other public transport). 7.6 A high quality service will be far more attractive to people who are considering whether to make a shift to rail in light of other drivers (e.g. fuel increases, shifting to a new location). Those users are likely to be particularly sensitive to service quality, as they have not yet become resigned to things like the smell of urine at stations, unreliability of train arrival and transit times, and uncomfortable rolling stock. For example: fuel price rises have seen significant shift from private car usage to suburban rail, however service quality issues have seen the majority of those users drift back to other means of transport. 7.7 A poor quality of service will tend to encourage modal shift away from rail where people feel they have a choice, or have a new car-based option available to them (e.g. a new road, an additional car in the household). A poor quality of service will therefore be likely to increased induced traffic effects of new roads. 4 7.8 Other travel demand management measures (e.g. work travel planning) are less likely to be effective if a high quality and reliable public transport service is not available. KEY INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITATIONS ON THE KAPITI LINE 8. I undertook an exercise some years ago, as part of input to the Western Corridor Planning process, to identify the changes that would be most important to allow more reliable, frequent and faster services. I have updated that work to provide information for this purpose, taking into account changes made to the lines over the last few years. I have also included information related to legibility which was not involved in my earlier analysis. Key limitations 9. The most important limitations on the lines are listed below. These are ordered by their overall significance for supporting positive modal shift, but different limitations affect different groups of users (e.g. for some users lack of park and ride space may be the most important factor driving their modal choice). 9.1. The single track section of line between Paekakariki and Muri stations (more precisely known as the single track between North and South Junctions). 9.2. Congestion caused primarily by terminating services at intermediate stations (specifically at Porirua and Plimmerton Stations), but also by ill-considered timetabling. 9.3. Numerous restrictions affecting the operating speeds of rail services. 9.4. The lack of passing loops or relief facilities through most of the line. 9.5. The lack of operating stations for a number of locations, notably the suburbs of Muri and Raumati, but also specific event locations such as Queen Elizabeth Park and the ferry terminal. 9.6. The lack of real time information (planned but not yet scheduled for installation). 9.7. Low park and ride capacity 5 9.8. Stations are often unattractive, uncomfortable, perceived as unsafe, and difficult to access safely and conveniently. 9.9. Poor provision in relation to bus replacement services (signage, marked bus stops, etc). North and South Junctions Single Track 10. The single track section extends 2.9 km. 11. This has the same effect on train services as a single lane piece of road or bridge has on road traffic – services going in one direction must wait at a signal until the service going in the opposite direction has gone through the stretch from the pervious signal. 12. In addition to this obvious effect, this particular part of the line is a very steep section of track (going uphill towards the south) with a number of narrow tunnels that date from when the line was built in the 1880s, and speed restrictions for freight trains. Freight trains frequently stall on the grade, further delaying other services. 13. North South Junction is the “tail” that “wags the dog” for rail operations on the Western Corridor and in turn this effects rail operations on the Hutt Corridor due to services on both corridors sharing the same tracks through the Kaiwharrawharra “Throat”. Without massive changes to rail reliability on the rest of the Western Corridor, the North and South Junctions single track limits this section of the corridor to a practical maximum frequency than 20 minutes in each direction (unless services were run in only one direction, in which case a greater frequency would be possible). 14. The problem created by the single track has been long recognised. Greater Wellington Regional Council commissioned BECA to prepare a feasibility report for possible tunnel deviations as a solution to the problem. That study - the 2005 Pukerua Bay – Paekakariki Railway Tunnel Feasibility Report - recommended that two new tunnels be built to replace the existing line (leaving the existing line available for other uses such as a walkway/cycleway). That solution would greatly reduce the grade problem for heavy trains (changing the grade from 1:66 to 1:100), remove the limitations on wagon/freight size for the freight trains, and ensure that an incident in one tunnel would not prevent the use of the line.
Recommended publications
  • Parish with a Mission by Geoff Pryor
    Parish with a Mission By Geoff Pryor Foreword - The Parish Today The train escaping Wellington darts first into one tunnel and then into another long, dark tunnel. Leaving behind the bustle of the city, it bursts into a verdant valley and slithers alongside a steep banked but quiet stream all the way to Porirua. It hurtles through the Tawa and Porirua parishes before pulling into Paremata to empty its passengers on the southern outskirts of the Plimmerton parish. The train crosses the bridge at Paremata with Pauatahanui in the background. There is no sign that the train has arrived anywhere particularly significant. There is no outstanding example of engineering feat or architecture, no harbour for ocean going ships or airport. No university campus holds its youth in place. No football stadium echoes to the roar of the crowd. The whaling days have gone and the totara is all felled. Perhaps once Plimmerton was envisaged as the port for the Wellington region, and at one time there was a proposal to build a coal fired generator on the point of the headland. Nothing came of these ideas. All that passed us by and what we are left with is largely what nature intended. Beaches, rocky outcrops, cliffs, rolling hills and wooded valleys, magnificent sunsets and misted coastline. Inland, just beyond Pauatahanui, the little church of St. Joseph, like a broody white hen nestles on its hill top. Just north of Plimmerton, St. Theresa's church hides behind its hedge from the urgency of the main road north. The present day parish stretches in an L shape starting at Pukerua Bay through to Pauatahanui.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Plimmerton School (2960) Charter Approved
    School Charter, Strategic & Annual Implementation Plan 2021 - 2023 March 2021 1 Te Kura o Taupō Plimmerton School Contents Introductory Section Description of the school 3 Major historical developments 4 Motto and mission 5 Vision 6 Values 7 Cultural diversity and Maori dimension 8 National Education and Learning Priorities 9 Strategic Plan Section Strategic Plan 2021-23 10 Annual Plan Section Refer to separate Annual plan spreadsheet APPROVED: March 2021 Page 2 Te Kura o Taupō Plimmerton School Description of the School Plimmerton School is a year 1 to 8 decile 10 school with a roll close to 500 students at the year end. The school includes 14% Maori students, 4% Pasific Peoples, 7% Asian, 73% NZ European, and 3% of other ethnic groups. Nestled in the coastal town of Plimmerton, north of Porirua city, we enjoy a unique combination of village community lifestyle, and the advantages of close proximity to city life. We are set 300m from the sea on a large site. Facilities include 23 classrooms, a field, a large hall/auditorium, a heated covered swimming pool, a technology centre, and a new library completed in 2020. Local iwi The original settlement of Hongoeka, today an active Ngati Toa marae with a wharenui, provides cultural richness and opportunity to the Plimmerton community. We share a close association with local iwi and Hongoeka, with a representative co-opted to the Board of Trustees. The school fosters participation and success of Maori students through Maori educational initiatives consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi such as the instruction in tikanga Maori and Te Reo Maori.
    [Show full text]
  • Paremata School Newsletter Thursday 2Nd February 2012017777 Week 111
    PAREMATA SCHOOL NEWSLETTER THURSDAY 2ND FEBRUARY 2012017777 WEEK 111 IMPORTANT DATES Monday 6th February SCHOOL CLOSED – Waitangi Day Wednesday 8 th February SCHOOL WILL CLOSE AT 12.30PM DUE TO STAFF FUNERAL Term Dates Term 1 - Thursday 2 nd February – Thursday 13 th April Term 2 – Monday 1st May – Friday 7th July Term 3 – Monday 24 th July – Friday 29th September Term 4 – Monday 16th October – Tuesday 19 th December (to be confirmed) Kia ora tatou Welcome back to school for 2017. We all hope you have had a lovely break and great to see all the children looking well rested and in most cases taller! As usual we have a very busy schedule and we look forward to a great term ahead. A very warm welcome to all our new families and to our new teacher Jenny Goodwin who joins us in Ruma Ruru for 2017. We hope you all settle in well and enjoy your time here. Sad News Unfortunately we start the year off with very sad news. Rod Tennant who has worked at Paremata and Russell School part time for many years and had only recently retired passed away suddenly yesterday afternoon. Rod was a highly valued and loved member of our school staff and also the husband of Trish Tennant our lovely Special Education Coordinator. We are all devastated with Rod's passing and send our love and prayers to Trish and the Tennant family. We have an area set up for Rod in the school office where you are welcome to leave cards and messages.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Demand Forecasts for Aggregates in Wellington
    Regional Demand Forecasts for Aggregates in Wellington This report has been prepared for Wellington City Council and is not intended for general publication or circulation. It is not to be reproduced without written agreement. We accept no responsibility to any party, unless specifically agreed by us in writing. We reserve the right, but will be under no obligation, to revise or amend our report in light of any additional information, which was in existence when the report was prepared, but which was not brought to our attention. Regional Demand Forecasts for Aggregates in Wellington Background 1. Background KPQ is strategically located in Ngauranga Gorge, on State Highway 1 within Wellington City. The quarry is a hard rock quarry extracting greywacke. The KPQ site also hosts: An asphalt plant owned and operated by Downer, and A concrete plant owned and operated by Allied Concrete in which Holcim has a 50% holding. There are long term supply agreements in place with these businesses which provide both long term stability and sales, with the advantage of having exposure to both roading and construction based sales. This provides balance if there are short term fluctuations in either market. There is reasonable ability to adjust production between either market. There are limited sources of aggregate material in the region. The greywacke rock resource reserves along the Wellington Fault have for many decades been the prime source of the hard rock quarried for use in the wider Wellington and Hutt Valley areas. Ngauranga Gorge has been quarried for over 100 years. 1920 Quarry activity in Ngauranga Gorge:Track & Stream (Alexander Turnbull Library) Regional Demand Forecasts for Aggregates in Wellington Regional Rock Resources and Alternatives 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Network Upgrade
    WELLINGTON NETWORK UPGRADE Better rail services for the region. Around 500,000 Wellingtonians and visitors take over 14 million passenger journeys each year on our Metro Rail Network. KiwiRail, Greater Wellington Regional Council and Metlink are working together to modernise the rail, thanks to investment of almost $300 million from the Government to enable: Train services to be more reliable. More people and freight travelling on rail in the future. The Wellington Metro Upgrade Programme is being delivered on a busy, well-maintained but ageing network where trains run 18 hours a day. The focus of our work is: Renewing existing network infrastructure to improve rail services. Renewing traction power overhead line system and signals power supply, and improving the track across the network including inside the four major tunnels. Adding capacity to the network so more people can travel on trains in the future while still allowing for freight services. This includes: Double tracking between Trentham and Upper Hutt. Improvements to Wellington station approaches. Changes at Plimmerton. More information www.kiwirail.co.nz (Wellington Metro Upgrade) HUTT LINE DOUBLE TRACKING More frequent, reliable trains. The 2.7 kilometres of rail line between Trentham and Upper Hutt is being double tracked so trains can travel in both directions at the same time. This will allow more frequent and reliable services along this section of the busy line from Wellington to Upper Hutt and Wairarapa. Stations are being upgraded and we are making it safer around our tracks. Wairarapa Existing Upper Hutt Future Connecting new second track to the network Level crossing upgrade at Blenheim Street Wallaceville Closing pedestrian crossing just North of Wallaceville New platform with shelters will be built in the style of Ava’s (pictured).
    [Show full text]
  • PERKINS FARM ESCARPMENT REVEGETATION Nga Uruora
    PERKINS FARM ESCARPMENT REVEGETATION Nga Uruora Concept Plan December, 2013 Perkins Farm Escarpment Revegetation: Nga Uruora Concept Plan Prepared by the Nga Uruora Committee PO Box 1 Paekakariki December 2013 Nga Uruora is a not-for-profit voluntary organisation on the Kapiti Coast of New Zealand with the aim of creating a continuous ribbon of bird-safe native forest running from Porirua through to Waikanae. The vision is to bring Kapiti Island’s dawn chorus back to the coast. www.kapitibush.org.nz December 2013 2 Perkins Farm Escarpment Revegetation: Nga Uruora Concept Plan Contents Our vision .................................................................................................................. 5 Summary ................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 7 Our approach ............................................................................................................ 8 How we prepared this report ................................................................................... 9 Our revegetation ideas ........................................................................................... 11 Waikakariki and Hairpin Gullies ............................................................................ 11 The current situation 11 Waikakariki Gully 12 Hairpin Gully 13 Retiring Waikakariki and Hairpin Gullies – the vegetation
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 1 Wellington Regional Rail Strategic Direction 2020.Pdf
    WELLINGTON REGIONAL RAIL STRATEGIC DIRECTION 2020 Where we’ve come from Rail has been a key component of the Wellington Region’s transport network for more than 150 years. The first rail line was built in the 1870s between Wellington and Wairarapa. What is now known as the North Island Main Trunk followed in the 1880s, providing a more direct route to Manawatū and the north. Two branch lines were later added. The region has grown around the rail network, as villages have turned into towns and cities. Much of it was actively built around rail as transit-oriented development. Rail has become an increasingly important way for people to move about, particularly to Wellington’s CBD, and services and infrastructure have been continuously expanded and improved to serve an ever-growing population. The region is a leader in per capita use of public transport. Wellington Region Rail Timeline 1874 1927 1954 1982 2010 2021 First section of railway between Hutt line deviation opened as a branch Hutt line deviation to Manor EM class electric FP ‘Matangi’ class Expected Wellington and Petone between Petone and Waterloo Park, creating Melling line multiple units electric multiple completion 1955 introduced units introduced of Hutt line 1876 1935 Hutt line duplication to Trentham duplication, Hutt line to Upper Hutt Kāpiti line deviation to Tawa, creating 1983 and electrification to Upper Hutt 2011 Trentham to 1880 Johnsonville line Kāpiti line Rimutaka Tunnel and deviation Upper Hutt 1 Wairarapa line to Masterton 1 electrification Kāpiti line 2 1938 replace
    [Show full text]
  • PLIMMERTON FARM SUBMISSION | K BEAMSLEY Page 1
    PLIMMERTON FARM – PLAN CHANGE PROPOSAL Supporting Documentation View from Submitters Property Karla and Trevor Beamsley 24 Motuhara Road Plimmerton PLIMMERTON FARM SUBMISSION | K BEAMSLEY Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION The village of Plimmerton is a northern suburb of Porirua, and is surrounded to the North and East by farmland. It represents the edge of existing residential dwellings. Generally existing homes are stand-alone dwellings on lots greater than 500m² in size. Most residents within Plimmerton and Camborne either commute into Wellington city or work from home. The demand for housing in this area is from professional couples or families looking for 3 – 4 bedroom family homes on a section with space for kids to run around in, not medium or high density three-storey buildings and apartments, this is reflected in the TPG report to PCC (Dec 2019). Medium density style townhouses, or apartments would be totally out of character of the surrounding residential areas, and would present a stark contrast to the remaining rural areas which bound the site. The Plimmerton Farm site is not located close to areas of high employment, nor is it close to local amenities like the main shopping areas of Porirua. The site is also not located within an area currently supported by existing infrastructure. Much of the infrastructure in the area is aging, and requires repair or upgrade to support existing demands. Therefore, the idea that Plimmerton Farm would provide homes in a location close to employment, amenities and infrastructure1 is simply incorrect in terms of a 10-year time frame. Areas where this would be true include the currently developing areas of Aotea, Whitby, Kenepuru, and Porirua East.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodist Church of New Zealand Archives Wellington District Baptism Registers
    Methodist Church of New Zealand Archives Wellington District Baptism Registers Holdings at October 2013 For more information, please contact: The Archivist Methodist Church of New Zealand Archives PO Box 931 Christchurch New Zealand 8140 Phone 03 366 6049 Email: [email protected] Website: www.methodist.org.nz The Methodist Church of New Zealand Archives in Christchurch is the approved repository for Methodist baptism registers once completed by parishes. They are part of parish and church records held in the Methodist Archives. Registers can date from the first Wesleyan missionaries’ time in New Zealand during the 1830s, through to the present day. They include all branches of Methodism in New Zealand: Primitive Methodist, Wesleyan, United Free Methodist, and Bible Christian. Some registers, particularly those still in use, are held by parishes. Details of how to contact parishes are on the Methodist Church website www.methodist.org.nz In the case of union or combined parishes, registers containing Methodist baptisms may be held by other repositories such as the Presbyterian Archives and Anglican Archives. The format of baptism registers varied over the years. Early registers often only contained the name of the person being baptised, the date of baptism, the district they lived in and the name of the minister performing the baptism. 1 Methodist Church of New Zealand Archives Auckland District Baptism Registers List updated October 2013 Later on, when standard baptism registers were printed and distributed by the Methodist Church, more information was added, such as birth date, names of parents, their address and the parish or circuit in which the baptism was taking place.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Transport Committee 30 October 2018, Order Paper - Front Page
    Sustainable Transport Committee 30 October 2018, Order Paper - Front Page If calling please ask for: Democratic Services 26 October 2018 Sustainable Transport Committee Order Paper for the meeting of the Sustainable Transport Committee to be held in the Council Chamber, Greater Wellington Regional Council, Level 2, 15 Walter Street, Te Aro, Wellington Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 9.30am Membership Cr Donaldson (Chair) Cr Ponter (Deputy Chair) Cr Blakeley Cr Brash Cr Gaylor Cr Kedgley Cr Laban Cr Laidlaw Cr Lamason Cr McKinnon Cr Ogden Cr Staples Cr Swain Marama Tuuta Recommendations in reports are not to be construed as Council policy until adopted by Council 1 Sustainable Transport Committee 30 October 2018, Order Paper - Agenda Sustainable Transport Committee Order Paper for the meeting to be held on Tuesday, 30 October 2018 in the Council Chamber, Greater Wellington Regional Council, Level 2, 15 Walter Street, Te Aro, Wellington at 9.30am Public Business Page No. 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of conflict of interest 3. Public participation 4. Confirmation of the Public minutes of 19 September Report 18.429 3 2018 5. Action items from previous Sustainable Transport Report 18.427 11 Committee meetings 6. Implementation of new Wellington bus network – Report 18.457 16 October update 7. Ticketing arrangement for Accessible Concession Report 18.458 60 8. Christmas day travel Report 18.503 64 9. General Managers' report to the Sustainable Report 18.454 68 Transport Committee meeting on 30 October 2018 10. Exclusion of the public Report 18.505
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Snapshot of Porirua
    HISTORICAL SNAPSHOT OF PORIRUA This report details the history of Porirua in order to inform the development of a ‘decolonised city’. It explains the processes which have led to present day Porirua City being as it is today. It begins by explaining the city’s origins and its first settlers, describing not only the first people to discover and settle in Porirua, but also the migration of Ngāti Toa and how they became mana whenua of the area. This report discusses the many theories on the origin and meaning behind the name Porirua, before moving on to discuss the marae establishments of the past and present. A large section of this report concerns itself with the impact that colonisation had on Porirua and its people. These impacts are physically repre- sented in the city’s current urban form and the fifth section of this report looks at how this development took place. The report then looks at how legislation has impacted on Ngāti Toa’s ability to retain their land and their recent response to this legislation. The final section of this report looks at the historical impact of religion, particularly the impact of Mormonism on Māori communities. Please note that this document was prepared using a number of sources and may differ from Ngati Toa Rangatira accounts. MĀORI SETTLEMENT The site where both the Porirua and Pauatahanui inlets meet is called Paremata Point and this area has been occupied by a range of iwi and hapū since at least 1450AD (Stodart, 1993). Paremata Point was known for its abundant natural resources (Stodart, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Porirua – Our Place, Our Future, Our Challenge Let's Kōrero
    COPYRIGHT © You are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to Porirua City Council. Published March 2021. Porirua City Council 16 Cobham Court PO Box 50218 Porirua 5240 This document is available on our website poriruacity.govt.nz Porirua – our place, our future, our challenge Let’s kōrero Consultation Document for the proposed Long-term Plan 2021-51 Message from Ngāti Toa Rangatira E te iwi e noho nei i te riu o Porirua, tēnā koutou katoa The development of the city's Long-term Plan 2021-2051 will bring changes to our city that we will be proud of. Between now and 2051 we will see Porirua transform into a vibrant and exciting place to be for residents and people who choose to work here. We are blessed with hills, waterways, Te Mana o Kupe bushwalks and two magnificent harbours, Porirua and Pāuatahanui, as well as rich histories all anchored by Te Matahourua, the anchor left here by Kupe. As a challenge to all of us – we must look after our environment and look after each other, especially our tamariki and rangatahi. Nou te rourou, naku te rourou ka ora ai te Iwi With your contribution, and my contribution the people will thrive Taku Parai Chairman, Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Toa Rangatira 2 Consultation Document for the proposed LTP 2021-51 Contents Mai i tō Koutou Koromatua 4 From your Mayor Executive summary 8 Rates 10 The challenges for our city 11 Your views 16 Investment in the 3 waters – drinking water, wastewater 17 & stormwater 1.
    [Show full text]