150 and 300 Kw Lightweight Diesel Aircraft Engine Design Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

150 and 300 Kw Lightweight Diesel Aircraft Engine Design Study https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19800011788 2020-03-21T19:51:36+00:00Z NASA Contractor Report 3260 150 and 300 kW Lightweight Diesel Aircraft Engine Design Study Alex P. Brouwers Teledyne Continental Motors Muskegon, Michigan Prepared for Lewis Research Center under Contract NAS3-20830 N/ /X National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Office 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS PageNo. 1.0 Summary ...................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ................................................... 4 2.1 Advantages of the Diesel Engine .................................. 4 2.2 Previous Aircraft Diesel Engines .................................. 5 2.3 Scope of the Project ............................................. 7 2.4 Relative Merit of this Project to the General Field .................... 7 2.5 Significance of the Project ....................................... 7 3.0 Engine Design Study ............................................. 8 3.1 Technology Analysis ............................................ 8 3.1.1 Literature Search ............................................... 8 3.1.2 Definition of the Technology Base ................................. 8 3.1.3 Definition of the Design Approaches ............................... 16 3.1.4 Criteria Attributes ............................................... 17 3.1.5 Ranking Priorities ................................................ 18 3.1.6 Rating of Criteria ............................................... 19 3.1.7 Logic of Ranking ................................................ 19 3.2 Choice of EngineConfiguration and Technologies ................... 27 3.2.1 Initial Elimination of Items from the Flow Chart Figure 3-1 ............. 27 3.2.2 Choice of Engine Configuration ................................... 29 3.2.3 Comparison of 2-Stroke Cycle Operation vs. 4-Stroke Cycle ............ 34 3.2.4 Final Engine Configuration ....................................... 35 3.2.5 Choice of Technologies .......................................... 36 3.3 The 298 kW 6-Cylinder Engine ..................................... 36 3.3.1 Stroke Cycle ................................................... 36 3.3.2 Uncooled Cylinders ............................................. 36 3.3.3 Injection System ................................................ 36 3.3.4 Independent Turbocharger Operation .............................. 36 3.3.5 Synthetic Oil ................................................... 39 iiio°° Page No. 3.3.6 Initial Performance Parameters ................................... 39 3.3.7 Engine Concept Design .......................................... 40 3.3.8 298 kW Engine Operating Data .................................... 47 3.3.9 P-V Diagrams ................................................... 48 313.10 Stress Calculations ............................................. 54 3.3.11 Projection of Fuel Consumption ................................... 58 3.3.12 Energy Balance Turbocharger -- Take-Off .......................... 60 3.3.13 Cooling Requirements ........................................... 61 3.3.14 Anticipated Maximum Surface Temperatures of Engine Components ... 63 3.3.15 Weight of the 298 kW Diesel ...................................... 63 3.3.16 Initial Cost of the 298 kW Diesel ................................... 64 3.3.17 Emissions .... .................................................. 65 3.3.18 Noise ......................................................... 65 3.3.19 Risk Areas Associated with the Selected Design ..................... 66 3.3.20 Proposed Development Program for the 298 kW Diesel Engine ......... 66 3.3.21 Alternate Technologies .......................................... 69 3.3.22 Comparison of the 298 kW Aircraft Diesel and a Comparable Current Gasoline Engine .............................. 70 3.4 The 149 kW 4-Cylinder Engine ..................................... 72 3.4.1 Technologies Applied to the 149 kW Engine ......................... 72 3.4.2 Minimum Cylinder Cooling ....................................... 72 3.4.3 Variable Compression Ratio Piston ................................ 74 3.4.4 Mechanically Driven Centrifugal Blower ............................ 75 3.4.5 Glow Plug Starting Aid in Cylinders ................................ 75 3.4.6 Direct Propeller Drive ............................................ 75 3.4.7 Initial Performance Parameters ................................... 76 3.4.8 Engine Concept Design .......................................... 76 3.4.9 149 kW Engine Operating Data .................................... 87 3.4.10 P-V Diagrams ................................................... 88 3.4.11 Stress Calculations ............................................. 93 3.4.12 Projection of Fuel Consumption ................................... 97 3.4.13 Cooling Requirements ............................................ 97 iv Page No. 3.4.14 Anticipated Maximum Surface Temperatures of Engine Components ... 98 3.4.15 Turboc harger Operation ......................................... 100 3.4.16 Blower Operation ............................................... 100 3.4.17 Weight of the 149 kW Diesel ...................................... 100 3.4.18 Initial Cost of the 149 kW Diesel ................................... 100 3.4.19 Emissions ..................................................... 101 3.4.20 Risk Areas Associated with the Selected Design ..................... 101 3.4.21 Proposed Development Program for the 149 kW Diesel Engine ......... 102 3.4.22 Comparison of the 149 kW Aircraft Diesel and a Comparable Current Gasoline Engine .............................. 105 4.0 Engine/Airframe Integration ...................................... 107 4.1 Engine Installation ............................................... 107 4.1.1 Description of the Layouts ....................................... 107 4.2 Aircraft Configurations .......................................... 114 4.2.1 Twin Engine Airplane ............................................ 114 4.2.2 Single Engine Airplane .......................................... 116 4.3 Aircraft Performance Evaluation ................................... 118 4.3.1 Program Input Data ............................................. 118 4.3.2 Calculation Method ............................................. 122 4.3.3 Results of the Simulation Program ................................. 123 4.4 Operating Cost Estimates ........................................ 124 4.4.1 Airplane Acquisition Cost Estimates ............................... 12q 4.5 Propeller Noise Estimates ........................................ 127 5.0 Conclusions ................................................... 128 6.0 Recommendations .............................................. 130 7.0 List of References .............................................. 131 Append ixes A - Bibliography .............................................. 132 B - Metric Conversion Factors ................................. 143 v 1.0 SUMMARY Energy conservation, uncertainties of fuel supply and limited availability of high octane gasoline, have renewed the interest in the diesel aircraft engine, since its fuel economy is better than any type of aircraft engine currently in production. Aircraft diesel engines have been developed before, notably the Junkers "JUMO," the Napier "NOMAD" and the McCulloch TRAD 4180. Of these, only the Junkers opposed piston, 2-stroke cycle engine ever reached the production stage. The Napier Nomad was a 2-stroke cycle, turbocompounded design. Its complexity and the fact that it invaded the territory of turbine engines probably accounted for its demise. The McCulloch engine came close to flying when the program was terminated for non-technical reasons. New technologies, now under active development, will result in even better fuel economies than can be obtained with current state-of-the-art diesel engines. These technologies also make it possible to develop a powerplant which is more compact and lighter than current gasoline aircraft engines. Two engines were investigated in the study, a 298 kW diesel for a twin engined airplane and a 149 kW diesel for a single engined aircraft. The study consisted of three major phases: 1. Technology Analysis. All in-depth survey of available aviation and automotive sources was conducted to identify new developments which offer potential benefits to an aircraft engine. The technology base includes definition of: A. Existing automotive diesel technology, extrapolated to the expected level in the late 1980's. B. Existing and extrapolated aircraft engine technology. C. On-going diesel aircraft engine developments. These technologies were then evaluated and ranked on the basis of performance and adaptability. Engine Concept Design. The technologies which were chosen as a result of the evaluation and ranking process were applied to the design of the 149 and 298 kW engines. Performance, stress, weight, and cost calculations were made concurrently. Engine/Aircraft Integration Study. The results of Phase 2 were then used in an engine-aircraft integration study to determine the performance improvement of an airplane equipped with diesel engines. The study indicates that the diesel promises to be a superior powerplant for general aviation aircraft. The following tabulation, in which the 298 kW diesel is compared to a comparable gasoline aircraft engine shows a reduction of fuel flow, a smaller package and reduced engine weight; see Table I. TABLE I Diesel vs. Gasoline Engine 4-Cycle
Recommended publications
  • Turbocompound Reheat Gas Turbine Combined Cycle 2015
    INFRASTRUCTURE MINING & METALS NUCLEAR, SECURITY & ENVIRONMENTAL OIL, GAS & CHEMICALS Turbocompound Reheat Gas Turbine Combined Cycle 2015 Turbocompound Reheat Gas Turbine Combined Cycle S. Can Gülen Mark S. Boulden Bechtel Infrastructure Power POWER-GEN INTERNATIONAL 2015 December 8 - 10, 2015 Las Vegas Convention Center Las Vegas, NV USA ABSTRACT This paper discusses a new power generation cycle based on the fundamental thermodynamic concepts of constant volume combustion and reheat. The turbo- compound reheat gas turbine combined cycle (TC-RHT GTCC) comprises three pieces of rotating equipment: A turbo-compressor and two prime movers, i.e., a reciprocating gas engine and an industrial (heavy duty) gas turbine. Ideally, the cycle is proposed as the foundation of a customized power plant design of a given size and performance by combining different prime movers with new "from the blank sheet" designs. Nevertheless, a compact power plant based on the TC-RHT cycle can also be constructed by combining off-the-shelf equipment with modifications for immediate implementation. The paper describes the underlying thermodynamic principles, representative cycle calculations and value proposition as well as requisite modifications to the existing hardware. The operational philosophy governing plant start-up, shut-down and loading is described in detail. Also included in the paper is a 110 MW reference power block concept with 57+% net efficiency. The concept has been developed using a pre-engineered standard block approach and is amenable to simple “module-by-module” construction including easy shipment of individual components. POWER-GEN INTERNATIONAL 2015 Page 1 OF 26 INTRODUCTION Brief History Internal combustion engines can be classified into two major categories based on the heat addition portion of their respective thermodynamic cycles: “constant volume” and “constant pressure” heat addition engines (cycles) [1].
    [Show full text]
  • General Electric Company Turbofan Engines
    50320 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 11. Markings and Placards— Vibration levels imposed on the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Miscellaneous Markings and Placards— airframe can be mitigated to an Fuel, and Oil, Filler Openings acceptable level by utilization of Federal Aviation Administration (Compliance With § 23.1557(c)(1)(ii) isolators, damper clutches, and similar Requirements) provisions so that unacceptable 14 CFR Part 39 Instead of compliance with vibration levels are not imposed on the [Docket No. FAA–2013–0195; Directorate § 23.1557(c)(1)(i), the applicant must previously certificated structure. Identifier 2013–NE–08–AD; Amendment 39– comply with the following: 14. Powerplant Installation—One 17553; AD 2013–16–15] Fuel filler openings must be marked Cylinder Inoperative RIN 2120–AA64 at or near the filler cover with— Tests or analysis, or a combination of For diesel engine-powered Airworthiness Directives; General methods, must show that the airframe airplanes— Electric Company Turbofan Engines can withstand the shaking or vibratory (a) The words ‘‘Jet Fuel’’; and forces imposed by the engine if a AGENCY: Federal Aviation (b) The permissible fuel designations, cylinder becomes inoperative. Diesel Administration (FAA), DOT. or references to the Airplane Flight engines of conventional design typically Manual (AFM) for permissible fuel ACTION: Final rule. have extremely high levels of vibration designations. when a cylinder becomes inoperative. SUMMARY: We are adopting a new (c) A warning placard or note that Data must be provided to the airframe airworthiness directive (AD) for all states the following or similar: installer/modifier so either appropriate General Electric Company (GE) model ‘‘Warning—this airplane is equipped design considerations or operating GEnx–2B67B turbofan engines with with an aircraft diesel engine; service procedures, or both, can be developed to booster anti-ice (BAI) air duct, part with approved fuels only.’’ prevent airframe and propeller damage.
    [Show full text]
  • The TSR-2: a BRITISH STORY with an AUSTRALIAN CHAPTER
    RAAF Radschool Association Magazine – Vol 32 Page 15 The TSR-2: A BRITISH STORY WITH AN AUSTRALIAN CHAPTER With the era of the F-111 coming to a close, it is timely to reflect on the development of this aircraft and the rivals that existed at the time of its selection. The principal competitor was the British Aircraft Corporation’s Tactical Strike and Reconnaissance (TSR-2) aircraft. However, as indicated by Sir Sydney Camm’s comment, the development and subsequent abrupt cancellation of the project in 1965 was politically charged. While it was suggested at the time that Australia played a key role in the demise of the TSR-2, there appears to have been many other contributors to its downfall. From the mid 1950s, the RAF and subsequently the RAAF identified the need to replace the Canberra bomber, focusing on a nuclear-capable aircraft. Given the rapid advances in anti-aircraft weaponry capability, having supersonic strike aircraft that could slip under radar surveillance was seen as a priority. The development of the TSR-2 was also the result of the British Government’s focus in the late 1950s on rationalising the eight main British aircraft manufacturers that then existed. On New Year’s Day 1959, Vickers-Armstrong and English Electric, amalgamated as the new British Aircraft Corporation (BAC), were awarded the contract to combine their earlier individual designs into the TSR-2. Later that year Bristol- Siddeley were awarded the contract for development of the Olympus engines which were to power the aircraft. Like the development of any aircraft, the TSR-2 had its technical problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Vehicle Options Arising from the Barrel Type Piston Engine
    Journal of Power Technologies 101 (1) (2021) 22–33 Military vehicle options arising from the barrel type piston engine Pawe l Mazuro1 and Cezary Chmielewski1,B 1Warsaw University of Technology B [email protected] Abstract in terms of efficiency, meaning that piston engines can deliver enhanced range and endurance. This is benefi- The article reviews knowledge about requirements for engines in cial in missions requiring a stopover for refueling and state-of-the-art unmanned aerial vehicles and tanks. Analysis of particularly useful for unmanned supply, observation design and operational parameters was carried out on selected and maritime missions. turboshaft and piston engines generating power in the range of 500 - 1500 kW (0.5 - 1.5 MW). The data was compared In contrast, land combat vehicles have significantly with the performance of innovative, barrel type piston engines, different drive unit requirements. High mobility en- which are likely to become an alternative drive solution in the ables the vehicle to rapidly change location after de- target vehicle groups. tection. To this end, the torque curve as a function of the rotational speed of the shaft is of decisive im- portance. Keywords: military UAV, tanks, turboshaft engines, piston engines, barrel type piston engines The complexity of tank engines adds an additional layer of requirements, impacting the reliability and durability of the power unit, and they come with re- 1 Introduction lated manufacturing and operating costs. In military land vehicles, the engine should be as small This article consolidates knowledge on options and as possible; the space saved can be used for other capabilities arising from use of the barrel type piston purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 160/Monday, August 19, 2013
    Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 50317 (3) The factor with wing flaps extended as 3A13 to include the new Model J182T model T182T. The regulations specified in CS–VLA 345. with the Societe de Motorisation incorporated by reference in the type (f) Kinds of operation. The kinds of Aeronautiques (SMA) Engines, Inc. certificate are commonly referred to as operation (day VFR or day and night VFR, SR305–230E–C1 which is a four-stroke, the ‘‘original type certification basis.’’ In whichever is applicable) in which the aeroplane may be used, must be stated. The air cooled, diesel cycle engine that uses addition, the J182T certification basis minimum equipment required for the turbine (jet) fuel. The Model No. J182T, includes special conditions and operation must be listed. which is a derivative of the T182 equivalent levels of safety. (g) Powerplant limitations. The following currently approved under Type If the Administrator finds that the information must be furnished: Certificate No. 3A13, is an aluminum, applicable airworthiness regulations (1) Limitation required by CS–VLA 1521. four place, single engine airplane with (i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain (2) Information necessary for marking the a cantilever high wing, with the SMA adequate or appropriate safety standards instruments required by CS–VLA 1549 to 1553. SR305–230E–C1 diesel cycle engine and for the J182T because of a novel or (3) Fuel and oil designation. associated systems installed. unusual design feature, special (4) For two-stroke engines, fuel/oil ratio. In anticipation of the reintroduction conditions are prescribed under the (h) Placards.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 225 November 22, 2011 Pages 72081–72300
    Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 225 November 22, 2011 Pages 72081–72300 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Mar 15 2010 20:07 Nov 21, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\22NOWS.LOC 22NOWS mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with FEDREGWS II Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2011 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Boosting and Energy Recovery Systems for Engine Downsizing
    energies Review Electric Boosting and Energy Recovery Systems for Engine Downsizing Mamdouh Alshammari 1,2, Fuhaid Alshammari 2 and Apostolos Pesyridis 1,* 1 Centre of Advanced Powertrain and Fuels (CAPF), Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Brunel University London, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK; [email protected] 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hai’l, Hail 55476, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 October 2019; Accepted: 4 December 2019; Published: 6 December 2019 Abstract: Due to the increasing demand for better fuel economy and increasingly stringent emissions regulations, engine manufacturers have paid attention towards engine downsizing as the most suitable technology to meet these requirements. This study sheds light on the technology currently available or under development that enables engine downsizing in passenger cars. Pros and cons, and any recently published literature of these systems, will be considered. The study clearly shows that no certain boosting method is superior. Selection of the best boosting method depends largely on the application and complexity of the system. Keywords: engine downsizing; electrically assisted turbocharger; electric supercharger; e-turbo; waste heat recovery; turbocharging; supercharging; turbocompounding; organic Rankine cycle 1. Introduction Although internal combustion engines are getting more efficient nowadays, still the major part of fuel energy is transformed into wasted heat. In terms of harmful exhaust emissions, the transportation sector is responsible for the one-third of CO2 emissions worldwide and approximately 15% of the overall greenhouse gas emissions [1]. Moreover, owing to the limited amount of fossil fuels, prices fluctuate significantly, with consistent general rising trends, resulting in economic issues in non-oil-producing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 19FFL-0023 2-Stroke Engine Options for Automotive Use: a Fundamental Comparison of Different Potential Scavenging Arrangements for Medium-Duty Truck Applications
    Citation for published version: Turner, J, Head, RA, Chang, J, Engineer, N, Wijetunge, RS, Blundell, DW & Burke, P 2019, '2-Stroke Engine Options for Automotive Use: A Fundamental Comparison of Different Potential Scavenging Arrangements for Medium-Duty Truck Applications', SAE Technical Paper Series, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0071 DOI: 10.4271/2019-01-0071 Publication date: 2019 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication The final publication is available at SAE Mobilus via https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0071 University of Bath Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 Paper Offer 19FFL-0023 2-Stroke Engine Options for Automotive Use: A Fundamental Comparison of Different Potential Scavenging Arrangements for Medium-Duty Truck Applications Author, co-author (Do NOT enter this information. It will be pulled from participant tab in MyTechZone) Affiliation (Do NOT enter this information. It will be pulled from participant tab in MyTechZone) Abstract For the opposed-piston engine, once the port timing obtained by the optimizer had been established, a supplementary study was conducted looking at the effect of relative phasing of the crankshafts The work presented here seeks to compare different means of on performance and economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Constant Volume Combustion: the Ultimate Gas Turbine Cycle
    INFRASTRUCTURE MINING & METALS NUCLEAR, SECURITY & ENVIRONMENTAL OIL, GAS & CHEMICALS Constant volume combustion: the ultimate gas turbine cycle About Bechtel Bechtel is among the most respected engineering, project management, and construction companies in the world. We stand apart for our ability to get the job done right—no matter how big, how complex, or how remote. Bechtel operates through four global business units that specialize in infrastructure; mining and metals; nuclear, security and environmental; and oil, gas, and chemicals. Since its founding in 1898, Bechtel has worked on more than 25,000 projects in 160 countries on all seven continents. Today, our 58,000 colleagues team with customers, partners, and suppliers on diverse projects in nearly 40 countries. Guest Feature Also in this section Constant volume combustion: 00 DARPA-funded CVC projects the ultimate gas turbine cycle 00 Power cycle thermodynamics 00 History of CVC engineering By S. C. Gülen, PhD, PE; Principal Engineer, Bechtel Power Pulse detonation combustion holds the key to 45% simple cycle and close to 65% combined cycle efficiencies at today’s 1400-1500°C gas turbine firing temperatures. The Kelvin-Planck statement of the Second Law of Thermo- Why constant volume combustion? dynamics leaves no room for doubt: the maximum efficiency In a modern gas turbine with an approximately constant pres- of a heat engine operating in a thermodynamic cycle cannot sure combustor, the compressor section consumes close to exceed the efficiency of a Carnot cycle operating between 50% of gas turbine power output. the same hot and cold temperature reservoirs. Assume one could devise a combustion system where All practical heat engine cycles are attempts to approxi- energy added to the working fluid (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • N O T I C E This Document Has Been Reproduced From
    N O T I C E THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CERTAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE CONTRACTORS REPORT NO. 995 NASA CR•165,170 LIGHTWEIGHT DIESEL ENGINE DESIGNS FOR COMMUTER TYPE AIRCRAFT (NASA-C8-165470) LIG BINEIGHT DIESEL ENGINE DiS1VNS FOR C ONMUTEi T y kE N82-11066 Coatiuenta^ AIRCRAFT (TelEdyne 10t0rs, nuskeyon, Micu^) 7U P hC: A04/&F A01 CSCL 21c Uncla., G3/J7 u8165 Alex P. Brouwers Teledyne Continental Motors General Products Division 76 Getty Street Muskegon, Michigan 49442 JULY 1981 ^^ NGV1S81 RECEIVED NASA Sn FACSftx Acm 01 PREPARED FOR: AMM NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION LEWIS RESEARCH CENTER 21000 BROOKPARK ROAD CLEVELAND, OHIO 44135 CONTRACT NAS3.22149 CONTRACTORS REPORT NO. 995 NASA CR•165470 LIGHTWEIGHT DIESEL ENGINE DESIGNS FOR COMMUTER TYPE AIRCRAFT Alex P. Bromers Teledyne Continental Motors General Products Division 76 Getty Street Muskegon, Michigan 49442 JULY 1981 PREPARED FOR: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION LEWIS RESEARCH CENTER 21000 BROOKPARK ROAD CLEVELAND, OHIO 44135 CONTRACT NAS3.22149 .xTELEDYNE C *ff1NEN1AL Mc7 M. General Products Wslon 4244J7-81 U, TABLE OF CONTENTS Papa No. 1.0 Summary ................................................................1 2.0 Introduction .............................................................3 2.1 Purpose of the Study ..................................................3 2.2 Previous Large Aircraft Diesel Engines
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Propulsion C Fayette Taylor
    SMITHSONIAN ANNALS OF FLIGHT AIRCRAFT PROPULSION C FAYETTE TAYLOR %L~^» ^ 0 *.». "itfnm^t.P *7 "•SI if' 9 #s$j?M | _•*• *• r " 12 H' .—• K- ZZZT "^ '! « 1 OOKfc —•II • • ~ Ifrfil K. • ««• ••arTT ' ,^IfimmP\ IS T A Review of the Evolution of Aircraft Piston Engines Volume 1, Number 4 (End of Volume) NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM 0/\ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM SMITHSONIAN ANNALS OF FLIGHT VOLUME 1 . NUMBER 4 . (END OF VOLUME) AIRCRAFT PROPULSION A Review of the Evolution 0£ Aircraft Piston Engines C. FAYETTE TAYLOR Professor of Automotive Engineering Emeritus Massachusetts Institute of Technology SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS CITY OF WASHINGTON • 1971 Smithsonian Annals of Flight Numbers 1-4 constitute volume one of Smithsonian Annals of Flight. Subsequent numbers will not bear a volume designation, which has been dropped. The following earlier numbers of Smithsonian Annals of Flight are available from the Superintendent of Documents as indicated below: 1. The First Nonstop Coast-to-Coast Flight and the Historic T-2 Airplane, by Louis S. Casey, 1964. 90 pages, 43 figures, appendix, bibliography. Price 60ff. 2. The First Airplane Diesel Engine: Packard Model DR-980 of 1928, by Robert B. Meyer. 1964. 48 pages, 37 figures, appendix, bibliography. Price 60^. 3. The Liberty Engine 1918-1942, by Philip S. Dickey. 1968. 110 pages, 20 figures, appendix, bibliography. Price 75jf. The following numbers are in press: 5. The Wright Brothers Engines and Their Design, by Leonard S. Hobbs. 6. Langley's Aero Engine of 1903, by Robert B. Meyer. 7. The Curtiss D-12 Aero Engine, by Hugo Byttebier.
    [Show full text]
  • GTP-19-1645 Final PDF Document.PDF
    Citation for published version: Turner, J, Head, R, Wijetunge, R, Chang, J, Engineer, N, Blundell, D & Burke, P 2020, 'Analysis of different uniflow scavenging options for a medium-duty 2-stroke engine for a U.S. light-truck application', Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 142, no. 10, 101011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046711 DOI: 10.1115/1.4046711 Publication date: 2020 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication Publisher Rights CC BY Turner, J. W. G., Head, R. A., Wijetunge, R., Chang, J., Engineer, N., Blundell, D. W., and Burke, P. (September 29, 2020). "Analysis of Different Uniflow Scavenging Options for a Medium-Duty 2-Stroke Engine for a U.S. Light-Truck Application." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. October 2020; 142(10): 101011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046711 University of Bath Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 GTP-19-1645 ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT UNIFLOW SCAVENGING OPTIONS FOR A MEDIUM-DUTY 2-STROKE ENGINE FOR A U.S. LIGHT-TRUCK APPLICATION J.W.G.
    [Show full text]