DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis 1.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis 1.1 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents (Review) Lundstrøm LH, Duez CHV, Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Thomsen JL, Møller AM, Strande S, Wetterslev J Lundstrøm LH, Duez CHV, Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Thomsen JL, Møller AM, Strande S, Wetterslev J. Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD009237. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009237.pub2. www.cochranelibrary.com Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents (Review) Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON . ..... 4 BACKGROUND .................................... 7 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 8 METHODS ...................................... 8 RESULTS....................................... 12 Figure1. ..................................... 13 Figure2. ..................................... 15 Figure3. ..................................... 17 Figure4. ..................................... 18 Figure5. ..................................... 21 Figure6. ..................................... 22 DISCUSSION ..................................... 23 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . 26 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 26 REFERENCES ..................................... 27 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . 32 DATAANDANALYSES. 90 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 1 Difficult tracheal intubation: low risk of bias vs high oruncertainriskofbias. 92 Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 2 Difficult tracheal intubation: depolarizing vs non- depolarizingNMBA. 94 Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 3 Difficult tracheal intubation: remifentanil vs no remifentanil. .................................. 96 Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 4 Difficult tracheal intubation: alfentanil vs no alfentanil. ................................... 98 Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 5 Difficult tracheal intubation: local anaesthesia vs no localanaesthesia.. 100 Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 6 Difficult tracheal intubation: excluded anticipated DTI vs included anticipated DTI. 102 Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 7 Difficult tracheal intubation: “best-case scenario”. 104 Analysis 1.8. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 8 Difficult tracheal intubation excluding dose-finding studies..................................... 106 Analysis 1.9. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 9 Difficult tracheal intubation: funding from pharmaceuticalindustry. 107 Analysis 1.10. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 10 One or more events of upper airway discomfort or injury: low risk of bias vs high or uncertain risk of bias. ............... 109 Analysis 1.11. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 11 One or more events of upper airway discomfort or injury: depolarizing vs non-depolarizing NMBA. ............ 110 Analysis 1.12. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 12 One or more events of upper airway discomfort or injury: remifentanil vs no remifentanil. .......... 111 Analysis 1.13. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 13 One or more events of upper airway discomfort or injury: alfentanil vs no alfentanil. ........ 112 Analysis 1.14. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 14 One or more events of upper airway discomfort or injury: excluded anticipated DTI vs included anticipated DTI. ................ 113 Analysis 1.15. Comparison 1 Avoidance vs use of NMBA, Outcome 15 Difficult laryngoscopy: low risk of bias vs high or uncertainriskofbias. 114 ADDITIONALTABLES. 114 APPENDICES ..................................... 130 Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in i adults and adolescents (Review) Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. CONTRIBUTIONSOFAUTHORS . 140 DECLARATIONSOFINTEREST . 141 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PROTOCOL AND REVIEW . .... 141 Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in ii adults and adolescents (Review) Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Intervention Review] Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents Lars H Lundstrøm1, Christophe HV Duez2, Anders K Nørskov1, Charlotte V Rosenstock1, Jakob L Thomsen3, Ann Merete Møller 4, Søren Strande5, Jørn Wetterslev6 1Department of Anaesthesiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark. 2Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Univer- sity of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark. 3Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark. 4The Cochrane Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care Group, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark. 5Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Contact address: Lars H Lundstrøm, Department of Anaesthesiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, 3400, Denmark. [email protected]. Editorial group: Cochrane Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care Group. Publication status and date: New, published in Issue 5, 2017. Citation: Lundstrøm LH, Duez CHV, Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Thomsen JL, Møller AM, Strande S, Wetterslev J. Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD009237. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009237.pub2. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ABSTRACT Background Tracheal intubation during induction of general anaesthesia is a vital procedure performed to secure a patient’s airway. Several studies have identified difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) or failed tracheal intubation as one of the major contributors to anaesthesia-related mortality and morbidity. Use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) to facilitate tracheal intubation is a widely accepted practice. However, because of adverse effects, NMBA may be undesirable. Cohort studies have indicated that avoiding NMBA is an independent risk factor for difficult and failed tracheal intubation. However, no systematic review of randomized trials has evaluated conditions for tracheal intubation, possible adverse effects, and postoperative discomfort. Objectives To evaluate the effects of avoiding neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) versus using NMBA on difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) for adults and adolescents allocated to tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy. To look at various outcomes, conduct subgroup and sensitivity analyses, examine the role of bias, and apply trial sequential analysis (TSA) to examine the level of available evidence for this intervention. Search methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, International Web of Science, LILACS, advanced Google, CINAHL, and the following trial registries: Current Controlled Trials; ClinicalTrials.gov; and www.centerwatch.com, up to January 2017. We checked the reference lists of included trials and reviews to look for unidentified trials. Selection criteria We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of avoiding versus using NMBA in participants 14 years of age or older. Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in 1 adults and adolescents (Review) Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Data collection and analysis Two review authors extracted data independently. We conducted random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses and calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used published data and data obtained by contacting trial authors. To minimize the risk of systematic error, we assessed the risk of bias of included trials. To reduce the risk of random errors caused by sparse data and repetitive updating of cumulative meta-analyses, we applied TSA. Main results We identified 34 RCTs with 3565 participants that met our inclusion criteria. All trials reported on conditions for tracheal intubation; seven trials with 846 participants described ‘events of upper airway discomfort or injury’, and 13 trials with 1308 participants reported on direct laryngoscopy. All trials used a parallel design. We identified 18 dose-finding studies that included more interventions or control groups or both. All trials except three included only American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II participants, 25 trials excluded participants
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recommendations for Standards of Monitoring During Anaesthesia and Recovery 2021 Klein, A
    University of Dundee Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2021 Klein, A. A.; Meek, T.; Allcock, E.; Cook, T. M.; Mincher, N.; Morris, C. Published in: Anaesthesia DOI: 10.1111/anae.15501 Publication date: 2021 Licence: CC BY-NC-ND Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Klein, A. A., Meek, T., Allcock, E., Cook, T. M., Mincher, N., Morris, C., Nimmo, A. F., Pandit, J. J., Pawa, A., Rodney, G., Sheraton, T., & Young, P. (2021). Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2021: Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia, 76(9), 1212- 1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15501 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Anaesthesia 2021 doi:10.1111/anae.15501 Guidelines Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2021 Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists A.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page Monitoring and Reversal Of
    TITLE PAGE MONITORING AND REVERSAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE: A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL VERSUS QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS BY DR AYENI, Olajide O. (M.B.B.S., BENIN) A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT FOR THE AWARD OF THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE NATIONAL POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF NIGERIA, IN THE FACULTY OF ANAESTHESIA (FMCA). NOVEMBER 2015 ATTESTATION We hereby attest that this research titled “MONITORING AND REVERSAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE: A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL VERSUS QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS” was carried out by Dr Olajide O. AYENI. We have reviewed and supervised the conduct of the study. --------------------------------------------------------- PROF O.T KUSHIMO Supervisor Consultant Anaesthetist Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH). -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- DR A. MAFE DR. AKINTIMEHIN Supervisor Supervisor Consultant Anaesthetist Consultant Anaesthetist Lagos Island General Hospital GbagadaGeneraHospital Hospital Lagos. Lagos. 2 CERTIFICATION I certify that this research titled “MONITORING AND REVERSAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE: A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL VERSUS QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS” by Dr Olajide O. AYENI was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, LASUTH. --------------------------------------------------------- DR A.A MAJEKODUNMI Head of Department Department of Anaesthesia, LASUTH. 3 DECLARATION It is hereby declared that this work is original and done by me. I also acknowledge that the work has not been presented to any other College for a Fellowship nor
    [Show full text]
  • Review Course Lectures
    Review Course Lectures presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the International Anesthesia Research Society Honolulu, Hawaii March 20-23, 2010 IARS 2009 REVIEW COURSE LECTURES The material included in the publication has not undergone peer review or review by the Editorial Board of Anesthesia and Analgesia for this publication. Any of the material in this publication may have been transmitted by the author to IARS in various forms of electronic medium. IARS has used its best efforts to receive and format electronic submissions for this publication but has not reviewed each abstract for the purpose of textual error correction and is not liable in any way for any formatting, textual, or grammatical error or inaccuracy. ©2010 International Anesthesia Research Society 2 ©International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized Use Prohibited. IARS 2009 REVIEW COURSE LECTURES Table of Contents Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthesia in Infants, Neuroanesthesia for the Occasional Children and Adolescents Neuroanesthesiologist Santhanam Suresh, MD FAAP .................1 Adrian W. Gelb ............................36 Vice Chairman, Department of Pediatric Anesthesi- Professor & Vice Chair ology, Children’s Memorial Hospital Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Prof. of Anesthesiology & Pediatrics, Northwestern University of California San Francisco University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL Perioperative Control Of Hypertension: When Does Neuromuscular Blockers and their Reversal in 2010 It Adversely Affect Perioperative Outcome? François Donati, PhD, MD.....................6 John W. Sear, MA, PhD, FFARCS, FANZCA .......39 Professor, Departement of Anesthesiology Nuffield Department of Anesthetics, Université de montréal University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital Montréal, Québec, Canada Oxford, United Kingdom Anaphylactic and Anaphylactoid Perioperative Approach to Patients with Reactions in the Surgical Patient Respiratory Disease: Is There a Role \Jerrold H.
    [Show full text]
  • New Frontiers for Neuromuscular Blockade Use and Reversal
    New Frontiers for Neuromuscular Blockade Use and Reversal Presented as a Live Webinar On‐demand Activity Recording of live webinar Thursday, November 7, 2019 Available after March 31, 2020 2:00 p.m. ‐ 3:30 p.m. ET Accreditation Faculty Deborah Wagner, Pharm.D., FASHP, Activity Chair The American Society of Health‐System Clinical Professor of Pharmacy Pharmacists is accredited by the University of Michigan College of Pharmacy Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Clinical Professor of Anesthesiology Education as a provider of continuing Michigan Medicine pharmacy education Ann Arbor, Michigan • ACPE #: 0204‐000‐19‐417‐L01‐P Michael Aziz, M.D. • 1.5 hr, application‐based Professor of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine The American Society of Health System Oregon Health & Science University Pharmacists is accredited by the Portland, Oregon Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing Rachel C. Wolfe, Pharm.D., M.H.A., BCCCP medical education for physicians. Clinical Pharmacy Specialist Perioperative and Surgical Critical Care The American Society of Health‐System Pharmacists Barnes‐Jewish Hospital designates this live activity for a maximum of 1.5 St. Louis, Missouri AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent View faculty bios at of their participation in the activity. www.ashpadvantage.com/reversal/webinar1/ Webinar Information CE Processing Visit www.ashpadvantage.com/reversal/webinar1 Participants will process CE credit online at to find http://elearning.ashp.org/my‐activities. CPE credit Webinar registration link will be reported directly to CPE Monitor. Per ACPE, Group viewing information and technical CPE credit must be claimed no later than 60 days requirements from the date of the live activity or completion of a home‐study activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 – Pharmacology of Muscle Relaxants and Their Antagonists Mohamed Naguib, Cynthia A
    Chapter 13 – Pharmacology of Muscle Relaxants and Their Antagonists Mohamed Naguib, Cynthia A. Lien HISTORY AND CLINICAL USE In 1942 Griffith and Johnson[1] suggested that d-tubocurarine (dTc) is a safe drug to use during surgery to provide skeletal muscle relaxation. One year later, Cullen[2] described its use in 131 patients who had received general anesthesia for their surgery. In 1954, Beecher and Todd[3] reported a sixfold increase in mortality in patients receiving dTc versus those who had not received a relaxant. The increased mortality was due to a general lack of understanding of the pharmacology of neuromuscular blockers and their antagonism. The impact of residual neuromuscular blockade postoperatively was not appreciated, guidelines for monitoring muscle strength had not been established, and the importance of pharmacologically antagonizing residual blockade was not understood. Since then, the understanding of neuromuscular blocker pharmacology has improved, and relaxants have become an important component of many anesthetics and have facilitated the growth of surgery into new areas with the use of innovative techniques.[4] Succinylcholine, introduced by Thesleff[5] and by Foldes and colleagues in 1952,[4] changed anesthetic practice drastically. Its rapid onset of effect and ultrashort duration of action allowed for rapid tracheal intubation. In 1967, Baird and Reid first reported on clinical administration of the synthetic aminosteroid pancuronium.[6] Though similar to dTc, in terms of its duration of action, this compound had an improved cardiovascular side effect profile. It lacked ganglionic-blocking and histamine-releasing properties and was mildly vagolytic. The resulting increases in heart rate and blood pressure were considered significant improvements over its predecessors.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of the Electromyography
    Anesth Pain Med 2021;16:133-137 https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.21014 Review pISSN 1975-5171 • eISSN 2383-7977 The latest trend in neuromuscular monitoring: return of the electromyography Wonjin Lee1,2 Received February 14, 2021 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, 2Paik Institute Accepted February 21, 2021 for Clinical Research, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea To reduce the risk of residual neuromuscular blockade, neuromuscular monitoring must be performed. Acceleromyography (AMG)-based neuromuscular monitoring was regarded as “clinical gold standard” and widely applied. However, issues related to patient’s posture and Corresponding author overestimation of train-of-four ratio associated with AMG-based neuromuscular monitoring Wonjin Lee, M.D. have increased. Recently, electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitoring is re- Department of Anesthesiology and ceiving renewed attention, since it overcomes AMG’s weaknesses. However, both AMG- Pain Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, KNRS Paik Institute for Clinical Research, based and EMG-based systems are useful when certain considerations are followed. Ulti- Inje University College of Medicine, 75 mately, to assure the patient’s good outcomes, the choice of monitoring system is not as im- Bokji-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan 47392, portant as the monitoring itself, which should be always implemented in such patients. Korea Tel: 82-51-890-6520 Fax: 82-51-898-4216 Keywords: Delayed emergence from anesthesia; Electromyography; Neuromuscular block- E-mail: [email protected] ing agents; Neuromuscular monitoring. INTRODUCTION methods for the residual neuromuscular blockade. The first peripheral nerve stimulator was developed in 1958 [7], A 2015 review [1] selected the two most relevant articles and thereafter, mechanomyography (MMG)- and electro- among 20 anesthesiology fields, and in the field of neuro- myography (EMG)-based measuring methods were devel- muscular blockers, the first was a report on the clinical use oped.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Caudal Ropivacaine on Non-Depolarizing Muscular Relaxation
    www.medigraphic.org.mx E A NO D NEST A ES Mexicana de IC IO EX L M O G O I ÍA G A E L . C C O . C Revista A N A T Í E Anestesiología S G S O O L C IO I S ED TE A ES D M AN EXICANA DE ORIGINAL ARTICLE Vol. 31. No. 1 January-March 2008 pp 15-20 Impact of caudal ropivacaine on non-depolarizing muscular relaxation Juan Antonio Covarrubias-Vela, MD;* Juan Pablo Sánchez-Rodríguez, MD;** Prof. Juan Manuel Romano-Machado,*** Rafael Martínez-Tejeda, MD;** Marco Antonio Díaz-Aguilar, MD;** Elisa Rionda-Díaz, MD;** Adriana Bonne-Echazarreta, MD** * Centro Médico ABC. Department of An- SUMMARY esthesiology and Critical Medicine. ** Centro Médico ABC. Department of An- Objective: To determine whether ropivacaine for caudal blockade prolongs esthesiology. the effect of intravenously administered atracurium to patients undergoing *** School of Economics and Business, Uni- anorectal surgery. Methods: Forty adult participants were randomly allo- versidad Anahuac. cated to two groups of 20 each; Group A (with caudal block) and Group B (without caudal block). After intravenous induction, Group A received cau- Reprints request: dal blockade with ropivacaine of 0.1% with a 14 ml volume. Group B was the Juan Pablo Sánchez Rodríguez, MD comparison group in which caudal blockade was not performed. The neuro- Mariano Matamoros Núm. 702 Col. Centro Apizaco, Tlaxcala zip code 90300 muscular blockade was monitored by using a Train-of-four stimulus and the Mexico duration of blocking effect of atracurium was measured in both groups. Phone +52 (55) 29 59 23 49 Results: The average time to reach the Train-of-four of 80% was 70.59 ± E-mail: [email protected] 10.72 min, for group A, while for group B was 55.67 ± 10.72 min (p < 0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Neuromuscular Transmission
    GE Healthcare Quick Guide Neuromuscular Transmission What is neuromuscular transmission? By comparison, GEHC offers the NMT module, which provides quantitative, automatic measurements of muscle response to Neuromuscular transmission (NMT) is the transfer of an impulse stimulus and consequentially, the level of block. This objective between a nerve and a muscle in the neuromuscular junction. measurement can be used to safely time extubation and avoid NMT can be blocked by neuromuscular blocking agents – drugs the occurrence of residual paralysis. which cause transient muscle relaxation and prevent the patient from moving and breathing spontaneously. GE Healthcare offers two different sensor types for the NMT Muscle relaxation is used during general anesthesia to enable module. The innovative MechanoSensor measures the motion endotracheal intubation and to provide the surgeon with optimal of the thumb with a piezoelectric sensor, which converts the working conditions. In critical care, muscle relaxation is used physical motion to an electrical signal and quantifies the evoked during mechanical ventilation to minimize the patient’s work of mechanical response. The MechanoSensor sensor is available in breathing and to improve oxygenation. adult and pediatric sizes. The ElectronSensor directly measures the electrical activity of the muscle with recording electrodes, How is the NMT block measured? quantifying the response to nerve stimulation. The ElectroSensor can be used on the patient's hand or foot in both adult and The level of neuromuscular block is routinely measured by pediatric patients. stimulating a peripheral nerve, usually in the hand and by subjectively evaluating the muscle response either visually or tactilely with a device. Evidence suggests that despite use of subjective neuromuscular monitoring techniques, a large percentage of patients arrive to the PACU with residual paralysis.1 MechanoSensor ElectroSensor NMT measurement setup with MechanoSensor based on kinemyography (KMG) for routine clinical NMT monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • APSF201602.Pdf
    NEWSLETTER The Official Journal of the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation www.apsf.org Volume 30, No. 3, 45-76 Circulation 122,210 February 2016 Editors' Note: This issue contains a series of articles regarding the safe use of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs. All anesthesia professionals should understand the importance of appropriately monitoring and reversing neuromuscular blockade. We believe that these articles will increase awareness, provide important educational information, and improve patient safety. Monitoring of Neuromuscular Blockade: What Would You Expect If You Were the Patient? by Robert K. Stoelting, MD The Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Table 1: Potential adverse effects of residual neuromuscular blockade in the immediate (APSF) believes that residual neuromuscular block- postoperative period ade in the postoperative period is a patient safety Need for tracheal reintubation hazard that could be addressed partially by better and consistent use of our qualitative standard train- Impaired oxygenation and ventilation (may be erroneously attributed to opioids) of-four (TOF) nerve stimulator monitors, but will Impaired pulmonary function (reduced forced vital capacity and peak expiratory flow rate) ultimately require quantitative (objective TOF) Increased risk of aspiration and pneumonia monitoring along with traditional subjective obser- Pharyngeal dysfunction vations to eliminate this problem completely.1-2 APSF and other anesthesia professionals believe Delayed discharge from the PACU that every patient receiving nondepolarizing neuro- muscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) should have at The peer review literature supports the conclu- Despite the evidence in the peer review litera- least qualitative, and preferably quantitative moni- sion that residual neuromuscular blockade in the ture and a survey of anesthesia professionals in toring of the intensity of neuromuscular blockade immediate postoperative period is more common which 90% of respondents agreed that quantita- using a peripheral nerve stimulator during the than appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Are There Rocuronium Rapid Metabolizers? a Case Report on the Importance of Neuromuscular Monitoring
    Review Article J Anest & Inten Care Med Volume 11 Issue 1 - September 2020 Copyright © All rights are reserved by DOI: 10.19080/JAICM.2020.11.555804 Josefin Grabert Are There Rocuronium Rapid Metabolizers? A Case Report on the Importance of Neuromuscular Monitoring Josefin Grabert*, Christian Stark and Markus Velten Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University, University Medical Center, Bonn, Germany Submission: July 07, 2020 Published: September 26, 2020 *Corresponding author: Josefin Grabert, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University, University Medical Center Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany, Tel: +49 228 287 14114 Abstract A healthy 34-year-old female was scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy and adnectomy under general anesthesia, combined with an epidural catheter. Throughout surgery, she required and received unusual high doses of rocuronium in unusual short intervals (1mg/kg/h) to maintain adequate neuromuscular block as confirmed by continuous neuromuscular monitoring. Also, despite a functioning epidural catheter, the patient required high doses of remifentanil. This case emphasizes the importance of neuromuscular monitoring in every patient receiving neuromuscularKeywords blocking agents. It also raises the question if there are unknown influences or different mechanisms of metabolism. Abbreviations:: Rocuronium, Neuromuscular Monitoring, Metabolism BIS: Bispectral monitoring, nAChR: nicotinergic Acetylcholine Receptor, NMBA: Neuromuscular Blocking Agent, PAP: Papanicolaou, TOF: Train of Four Introduction past medical history and no regular medication. Previous general Neuromuscular blocking agents are commonly used in anesthesia for cervical conisation was uneventful other than general anesthesia and are part of every anesthetist’s routine. postoperative nausea and vomiting. The preoperative laboratory Neuromuscular paralysis is required for tracheal intubation as well results were all within physiological range.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Peripheral Nerve Stimulators (A Kessow)
    Part I Anaesthesia Refresher Course – 2018 16 University of Cape Town Peripheral Nerve Stimulators Physical principles and clinical applications Dr Aneet Kessow Private Practice Honorary lecturer- University of Cape Town Peripheral Nerve Stimulators (PNS) are used to: Monitor neuromuscular blockade During induction of anaesthesia for intubation During surgery to guide repeated doses of muscle relaxants to assess the depth of relaxation To differentiate between different types of block At the end of surgery to assess the ability of reversal At the end of anaesthesia or in recovery to assess the degree of residual blockade Peripheral nerve identification To help identify peripheral nerves for nerve mapping To help identify peripheral nerves for nerve blockade To help prevent intraneural nerve injection of local anaesthetic An understanding of neuromuscular junction electrophysiology is vital to understanding the clinical application of PNS. Why is monitoring so important? Undetected Residual neuromuscular block is common in the recovery room. Up to 42 % of patients receiving intermediate acting non-depolarising muscle relaxants arrive in with a TOF ratio of less than 0.7. Standard clinical criteria do not reliably detect residual blockade and standard of care has shifted the accepted TOF ratio to 0.9 or greater. Residual neuromuscular blockade contributes to greater adverse respiratory events, greater chance of re-intubation, longer recovery stay and ICU admission. Properties of an electrical nerve stimulator The PNS generates a standard electrical pulse, which should be Supramaximal – A supramaximal stimulus is a stimulus that is greater than that needed to activate all the nerve fibres in a nerve. A stimulus of 20-25% more than that needed to generate a maximal clinical response is usually used.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Standards of Monitoring in Anaesthesia And
    Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015 Published by The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland December 2015 This guideline was originally published in Anaesthesia. If you wish to refer to this guideline, please use the following reference: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 85-93. This guideline can be viewed online via the following URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.13316/full Anaesthesia 2015 doi:10.1111/anae.13316 Guidelines Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015 : Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland* M. R. Checketts,1 R. Alladi,2 K. Ferguson,3 L. Gemmell,4 J. M. Handy,5 A. A. Klein,6 N. J. Love,7 U. Misra,8 C. Morris,9 M. H. Nathanson,10 G. E. Rodney,11 R. Verma12 and J. J. Pandit13 1 Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia, Dundee, UK, and Chair of Working Party, AAGBI 2 Associate Specialist, Department of Anaesthesia, Tameside Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK and Representative, Royal College of Anaesthetists 3 Consultant, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK 4 Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia, North Wales Trust, North Wales, UK 5 Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK 6 Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK 7 Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia
    [Show full text]