779 Events, Tourism and Governance Committee Meeting 17 September

779

Adopted Report of the Events Tourism and Governance Committee Meeting held Tuesday 17 September 2019 at 2pm

City of Gold Coast Council Chambers 135 Bundall Road Surfers Paradise 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 2 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

Index Adopted Report Events Tourism and Governance Committee Meeting Tuesday 17 September 2019

Item Direct. File Page Subject

1 OCOO LG115/1355/01/2019(P1) 4 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Action List And Forward Planning Schedule

2 LC LG222/365/02/02/01(P10) 5 Making Of Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019

3 OCEO LG115/1190/04/20/CF(P1) 185 Audit Committee Meeting – 26 August 2019

4 OCOO LG113/580/23(P1) 192 City Operational Plan And Corporate Plan 2018-19 Performance Report Quarter Four

5 OCOO LG449/756/02/01(P2) 207 Corporate Policy Portfolio Report 1 January - 30 June 2019

6 OS PN125059/16/-(P5) 219 History And Future Dealing With Council Freehold Lot 6 On Rp138987 - Currumbin Valley

7 OS LG314/-/-(P6) 228 City Contracting Plan 2018-19 Final Acquittal April 2019 To June 2019

Closed Session

8 OS RV36/188/-(P14) 264 2018-19 Rates And Water Debt Management Report - 2nd Half Year

9 OS PN324476/36(P1) 274 Ratification Of Water Account Adjustment

10 OCOO CS105/274/2019(P1) 278 Major Event Opportunity

KEY: OCEO - Office of the Chief Executive Officer OCOO Office of the Chief Operating Officer EPE - Economy, Planning and Environment OS - Organisational Services LC - Lifestyle and Community TI - Transport and Infrastructure WW - Water and Waste

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 3 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ADOPTED BY COUNCIL 20 SEPTEMBER 2019

RESOLUTION G19.0920.023 moved Cr La Castra seconded Cr PC Young That the Report of the Events, Tourism and Governance Committee Recommendations of Tuesday 17 September 2019, numbered ETG19.0917.001 to ETG19.0917.010, be adopted with the exception of Recommendation Number ETG19.0917.007 which was specifically resolved. CARRIED

ATTENDANCE

Cr R La Castra (Chairperson) Cr P C Young Cr D Gates Cr W M A Owen-Jones Cr K L Boulton Cr P A Taylor Cr D I McDonald Cr G M O'Neill

Mr A J McCabe Acting Chief Executive Officer Mr G Potter Director Organisational Services Mr A Papa Specialist Transport Planner (part) Mr S Stewart Acting Chief Procurement Officer (part) Mr L Jackson Acting Executive Coordinator Revenue Services (part)

APOLOGY / LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Nil

PRESENTATIONS

Nil

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 4 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 1 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER EVENTS TOURISM AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE ACTION LIST AND FORWARD PLANNING SCHEDULE LG115/1328/01/2019(P1)

Item Action Officer &/or Action/Previous Branch Resolution (780) Events, Tourism and Governance Committee 10 October 2019 Office of the Chief Executive Audit Committee Meeting 23 September 2019 Officer HOTA Gold Coast Pty Ltd Bi-Annual Performance Office of the Chief Executive Includes Presentation Report Officer Make Jetties and Boat Ramp (Amendment) Lifestyle & Community Subordinate Local Law (No.1) 2019 Information Management Policy and Information Organisational Services Privacy Policy Customer Experience Strategy Organisational Services Fleet Review Organisational Services Confidential Presentation Only (781) Events, Tourism and Governance Committee 24 October 2019 Office of the Chief Operating 2018-19 Annual Report Officer Connecting Southern Gold Coast Ltd Bi-Annual Office of the Chief Executive Includes Presentation Performance Report Officer Broadbeach Alliance Ltd Bi-Annual Performance Office of the Chief Executive Includes Presentation Report Officer Surfers Paradise Alliance Ltd Bi-Annual Office of the Chief Executive Includes Presentation Performance Report Officer (782) Events, Tourism and Governance Committee 7 November 2019 Office of the Chief Executive Confidential Report Corporate Structure Report Officer Office of the Chief Executive Presentation Only Olympics 2032 Update Officer (783) Events, Tourism and Governance Committee 21 November 2019 Office of the Chief Executive Includes Presentation Audit Committee Chair’s Annual Report Officer

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows: That the list of proposed Agenda Items for the Events, Tourism and Governance Committee be noted. Authorised by: Joe McCabe TRACKS REF: # 54648256 Chief Operating Officer

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.001 moved Cr Owen-Jones seconded Cr PC Young

That the list of proposed Agenda Items for the Events, Tourism and Governance Committee be noted.

CARRIED 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 5 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 LIFESTYLE & COMMUNITY MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10) Attachment ‘A’: Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 (as advertised for public consultation purposes) Attachment ‘B’: Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 (including tracked amendments post consultation) Attachment ‘C’: Consolidated version of Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 (untracked version) Attachment ‘D’: Submissions received during community consultation for Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 Attachment ‘E’: TAPPs Engagement and Marketing Report Attachment ‘F’: List of likely anti-competitive provisions Attachment ‘G’: Written agreement from the Chief Executive Department of Transport & Main Roads

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY

Not Applicable.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Not Applicable.

3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

The purpose of this report is for Council to resolve to: a make Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 as advertised (refer Attachment ‘A’), and further amended (refer Attachment ‘B’); and b adopt a consolidated version of Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 incorporating the amendments specified in the amending subordinate local law, referred to in paragraph a, (refer to Attachment ‘C’).

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS

Ex Minute ETG19.0523.003 and G19.0528.014

“That Council resolves to propose to make Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 (“the proposed subordinate local law”)…”

5 DISCUSSION

5.1 Introduction

In accordance with Council’s resolution on 28 May 2019 to make Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No.1) 2019 (‘proposed subordinate local law’), Attachment ‘A’, the making of the proposed subordinate local law has progressed in accordance with Council’s adopted local law making process.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 6 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

The proposed subordinate local law includes:

• identifying Traffic Area boundaries, including the Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area, Central Traffic Area, Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area, Main Beach Traffic Area, Robina Stadium Traffic Area, Southern Traffic Area, Southport Traffic Area, Stadium Residential Traffic Area and the Varsity Lakes Traffic Area • increasing the permit cap for multi-residential developments in the Southport and Central Traffic Areas (from 20 residences to 30 residences) • introducing carer permits for both paid care workers and unpaid carers • modifying permit criteria and conditions to improve clarity to applicants • introducing new criteria for multi-residential developments with a water connection date after 30 October 2018 • introducing administrative amendments to the Schedules relating to definitions, boat trailer parking and additional off-street carparks • identifying other information which must accompany a parking permit application • identifying conditions of a parking permit.

In accordance with Council’s adopted local law making process:

• Councillors were consulted in relation to the proposed amendments prior to drafting the amendments • public consultation was held from Saturday 1 June 2019 to 5pm Monday 24 June 2019 advising Council’s objective to amend the Subordinate Local Law • submissions were collated and considered (refer Attachment ‘D’).

5.2 Results of Consultation with the Community

To ensure the City was open and transparent about the proposed Traffic Area and Parking Permit Scheme (TAPPS) changes, a comprehensive consultation, marketing and communications campaign was undertaken which included advertising through social media, City channels, print, community stakeholder engagement and the City Panel. The TAPPS Engagement and Marketing Report is attached (refer Attachment ‘E’).

Campaign results

During this campaign:

• 272,457 people were reached via various marketing and communications channels • 8424 clicks were received through the “gchaveyoursay” survey • 5436 webpage site visits were recorded • 3100 documents were downloaded, including: o 527 downloads of the proposed Subordinate Local Law o 1765 downloads of Traffic Area boundary maps and Frequently Asked Questions o 808 downloads of the Parking Permits Guide.

A total of 550 submissions were received resulting in a total of 2201 responses, 1892 relating to Traffic Areas, 297 relating to the Parking Permit proposed changes, and 12 additional responses requesting consideration for individual circumstances. Each submission was reviewed with only one submission accepted per person.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 7 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

Key findings

A total of 1892 responses were received relating to Traffic Areas (via the 550 submissions):

Amendments Responses Analysis Traffic Areas

Taking into consideration the responses in 281 - supported Gold Coast Health and support of the proposed changes and those 67 - opposed Knowledge Precinct who opposed the proposed changes, 81% 125 - no comment provided support and 19% opposed.

Taking into consideration the responses in 148 - supported Robina Stadium (Event) support of the proposed changes and those 83 - opposed Traffic Area who opposed the proposed changes, 64% 242 - no comment provided support and 36% opposed.

Taking into consideration the responses in 149 - supported support of the proposed changes and those Southern Traffic Area 84 - opposed who opposed the proposed changes, 64% 240 - no comment provided support and 36% opposed.

Taking into consideration the responses in 279 - supported support of the proposed changes and those Southport Traffic Area 69 - opposed who opposed the proposed changes, 80% 125 - no comment provided support and 20% opposed.

A total of 297 responses were received relating to Parking Permits (via the 550 submissions):

Amendments Responses Analysis Parking Permits Taking into consideration the responses in support of the proposed changes and those who opposed the proposed changes, 59% provided support and 41% opposed.

It was established that most of the opposition 22 - supported Multi-residential related to the requirement that the road 15 - opposed Premises Resident / abutting the body corporate scheme land, of 29 - no comment Visitor parking permit which the applicant’s premises form part, must

have a minimum of 6 metres of clear legal parking space, to be eligible for a permit. This is a requirement that conforms with Council’s plan to free up on-street spaces for residents and short to medium term visitors in these areas. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 8 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

Amendments Responses Analysis Parking Permits continued… Taking into consideration the responses in support of the proposed changes and those who opposed the proposed changes, 42% provided support and 58% opposed.

It was established that most of the opposition Detached Premises 18 - supported related to the requirement that the road Resident / Visitor 24 - opposed abutting the detached premises of the parking permit 24 - no comment applicant must have a minimum of 6 metres of clear legal parking space, to be eligible for a permit. This is a requirement that conforms with Council’s plan to free up on-street spaces for residents and short to medium term visitors in these areas. 66 responses were received in relation to the three Event Parking Areas (Robina, Carrara & Main Beach). Taking into consideration the responses in support of the proposed changes 11 - supported and those who opposed the proposed Resident’s Event 14 – opposed changes, 44% provided support and 56% parking permit 41 – no comment opposed.

It was identified that only 4 of the responses came from residents within an event area. Of these residents 3 opposed and 1 supported. 75 responses were received in relation to the three Community Service Permits (Eligible Organisation, Residential Care Service Provider & Carers). Taking into consideration the responses in support of the proposed changes and those who opposed the proposed changes, 84% provided support and 16% 49 - supported opposed. Community Service 9 - opposed Permits 17 - no comment It was noted that some respondents provided responses in regard to multiple Community Service Permit types and were made up of Carers and people who may use a Carer. It was also identified that there were responses supporting the proposed amendments from respondents where this permit type was not applicable to the respondent’s personal situations. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 9 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

Amendments Responses Analysis Parking Permits continued… 12 responses were received in relation to the two Commercial Permits (Temporary parking 8 - supported permit and Works Zone parking permit). Commercial Permits 2 - opposed Taking into consideration the responses in 2 - no comment support of the proposed changes and those who opposed the proposed changes, 67% provided support and 33% opposed. Other A total of 12 responses were received requesting consideration for individual circumstances relating to resident parking permits that are one off or very specific issues. With the demand on the Gold Coast parking system continuing to grow as permanent and visitor populations increase, the parking permit Individual 12 responses scheme is designed to best manage parking circumstances for the City as a whole and it is not possible to amend the law for individual situations. Of the submissions relating to the proposed amendments for resident parking permits for both multi residential and detached dwellings, it was not considered that any were appropriate for this round of amendments.

5.3 Anti-competitive provisions

The Local Government Act 2009 (LG Act) requires that, where a local law contains an anti- competitive provision, Council must comply with the procedures specified in the Local Government Regulation 2012 for reviewing anti-competitive provisions. Council undertook a review of the proposed subordinate local law and determined that it did not contain any possible anti-competitive provisions (refer Attachment ‘F’).

5.4 Amendments

Consideration of public consultation, and subsequent review of the proposed subordinate local law, resulted in the following recommended amendments (refer Attachment ‘B’ which includes the tracked amendments):

• Amend the definition of detached premises to include a residence which forms part of a group of 2 residences which are touching, or attached, but not part of a community titles scheme, i.e. a duplex.

Including this category of touching residences as detached premises will apply the following provisions to the said touching residences. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 10 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

Detached premises resident parking permit (a) under each of Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 (the “current regime”) and Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 as amended by the proposed subordinate local law (the “proposed regime”), a permit may be granted in circumstances where a person resides in detached premises on a section of road and parking immediately adjacent to the detached premises is regulated by time; (b) under the proposed regime, a permit may not be granted if paid parking applies to the section of road, but paid parking is not mentioned in the current regime; (c) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a permit may be granted where the current registration certificate for the vehicle identified in the application identifies the applicant as the person in whose name the vehicle is currently registered. However, under the proposed regime, the applicant need not be the current registered owner of the vehicle if the applicant is authorised, by the current registered owner of the vehicle, to use the vehicle on a regular and ongoing basis, and to keep or store the vehicle at the detached premises identified in the application; (d) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a maximum of 3 permits may be granted if the detached premises has no off-street parking; (e) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a maximum of 2 permits may be granted if the detached premises has off-street parking for 1 vehicle; (f) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a maximum of 1 permit may be granted if the detached premises has off-street parking for 2 vehicles; (g) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a permit must not be granted if the detached premises has off-street parking for 3 or more vehicles; (h) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a permit must not be granted if the detached premises are situated within the Event Traffic Area; (i) under the proposed regime, a permit must not be granted if the detached premises are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business, but the current regime is silent about the use of the detached premises for a home based business; (j) under the proposed regime, a permit must not be granted unless the detached premises have a kerb side frontage of more than 6m, however, under the current regime, the 6m kerb side frontage requirement is not specifically identified.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 11 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

Detached premises visitor parking permit (a) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a permit may be granted in circumstances where a person resides in detached premises on a section of road and parking immediately adjacent to the detached premises is regulated by time; (b) under the proposed regime, a permit may not be granted if paid parking applies to the section of road, but paid parking is not mentioned in the current regime; (c) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a permit may be granted in circumstances where the permit is to be made available by the resident of detached premises for use by another person who is visiting the detached premises and intends parking on the section of road immediately adjacent to the detached premises; (d) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a permit may only be granted in circumstances where the detached premises does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, an off-street parking space for use by visitors of the resident; (e) under the proposed regime, a permit must not be granted unless the detached premises have a kerb side frontage of more than 6m, however, under the current regime, the 6m kerb side frontage requirement is not specifically identified; (f) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a maximum of 3 permits may be granted; (g) under each of the current regime and the proposed regime, a permit must not be granted if the detached premises are situated within the Event Traffic Area; (h) under the proposed regime, a permit must not be granted if the detached premises are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business, but the current regime is silent about the use of the detached premises for a home based business. Definition of detached premises Under the current subordinate local law, detached premises— (a) means a residence which is not attached to, or touching, another residence or another building; but (b) does not include a residence situated on a lot which forms part of a community titles scheme. Under Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019, relevantly, the definition of multi-residential premises is amended so that the expression multi-residential premises— (a) means a residence which forms part of a group of 3 or more residences in circumstances where each residence of the group is attached to, or touching, at least 1 other residence of the group; rather than (b) 2 or more residences in circumstances where each residence of the group is attached to, or touching, at least 1 other residence of the group. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 12 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

Given the amendment to the definition for the expression multi-residential premises, it is necessary to amend the definition of detached premises to address circumstances where residences are attached to, or touching, another residence or another building, but are not part of a community titles scheme. Accordingly, the revised definition for the expression detached premises is as follows— ‘detached premises— (a) means— (i) a residence which is not attached to, or touching, another residence or another building; and (ii) a residence which forms part of a group of 2 residences in circumstances where 1 residence of the group is attached to, or touching, the other residence of the group; but (b) does not include a residence situated on a lot which forms part of a community titles scheme.’ Amendment of the definition of detached premises The amendment to the definition of detached premises is not properly characterised as a substantial amendment. Relevant considerations and impacts are as follows:

o The category of premises which will be impacted by the amendment to the definition of detached premises is limited to residences which are attached to, or touching, another residence or another building and are not part of a community titles scheme (“impacted premises”). o Council has received approximately 500 submissions as a result of public consultation undertaken by Council, and of the submissions, only 3 submissions were received from persons about the impacted premises issue. o Occupiers of impacted premises will have an increased parking permit entitlement o The amendment will not impact on premises properly characterised as “multi residential” o There will be no impact on premises currently characterised as “detached premises” under the current subordinate local law. • A recommendation to amend an identified error in proposed section 11(14)(d)(ii) which refers to “a detached resident premises parking permit”, but should refer to “a detached premises resident parking permit”.

Recommendation Council should proceed with the making of the proposed subordinate local law as advertised, but amended in accordance with amendments above, and note that the amendments are considered an insubstantial change.

5.5 Next steps in the subordinate local law making process In accordance with Council’s law making process, Council may now resolve to make the proposed subordinate local law as advertised, but with insubstantial amendments, and proceed to inform the public and the Minister. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 13 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

Any decision by Council at this late stage to change a provision of the proposed subordinate local law may, depending upon the significance of the change, require further public consultation. The proposed insubstantial amendments do not require further public consultation.

Under section 29(5) of the LG Act, Council must ensure its subordinate local laws are drafted in compliance with the guidelines issued by the Parliamentary Counsel under the Legislative Standards Act 1992. The proposed subordinate local law complies with this requirement.

Section 32 of the LG Act provides that Council may prepare and adopt a consolidated version of a subordinate local law. A consolidated version of a subordinate local law is a document that accurately combines the subordinate local law as originally made with all the amendments made since it was originally made (refer Attachment ‘C’).

5.6 Implementation

Advice to affected residents

Transport and Traffic branch have developed a communication plan for the project. Following approval of the subordinate local law amendments, a letter that outlines the changes will be sent to residents residing within the expanded portion of the Southern Traffic Area. Health, Regulatory and Lifeguard Services branch will also advise residents within the reduced Southport and Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Areas that, due to the changes, they will not be required to renew their parking permits during the annual permit renewal process in late 2019.

Signage

After the proposed changes have been adopted by Council the Transport and Traffic branch will commence undertaking implementation of the regulatory parking signage. These works will take approximately 4-6 weeks.

Permit process

Health, Regulatory and Lifeguard Services branch will be undertaking the necessary Pathway configuration to enable the two new care providers permits to be processed within Pathway and creating new application forms to be available on the City website.

Website updates

The City website for the Traffic Areas will be updated by Transport and Traffic branch prior to implementation of the proposed changes. The updated content will include maps for existing and proposed Traffic Areas.

The City website information relating to Resident and Care Provider parking permits will be updated by Health, Regulatory and Lifeguard Services branch once the proposed changes have been approved for implementation. The updated content will include advice on the two new Care Provider permits and the amendments to eligibility criteria for existing permit types, as well as providing direction to the new application forms.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 14 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

The City Parking Plan 2015 vision is “To improve economic prosperity and urban amenity to support sustainable transport choices through a balance of parking options”.

Amending the City’s existing Traffic Areas and Parking Permit Scheme will contribute to the below strategic objectives:

• Gold Coast 2020 - Outcome 1.1: Our city provides a choice of liveable places. Actions within the City Parking Plan 2015 support this objective by providing parking convenience, accessibility and pricing transparency.

• Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031 - Providing better local parking management. Manage car parking in a way that supports the economic vitality of centres.

• City Parking Plan 2015 (CPP2015) - Manage the demand for parking to enhance the vitality of activity centres and make best use of the street as a public asset. The following actions contribute to this objective: o Action 2: Parking Regulations – Undertake strategic reviews to enhance parking conditions and information to improve safety and residential amenity in residential areas. o Action 6: Special Parking Management – Review the use of technologies, including e-permits, to enhance the provision and management of the Residential and Visitor Permit System.

7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS

Costs for Capital Works and Service Proposals

The TAPPS project is currently funded from the FY19-20 Transport & Traffic Branch Parking Operations budget centre (CI3370O001). This includes $200,000 to implement TAPPS Stage 2. Activities likely to be covered by this funding will include amending the Traffic Area boundary official traffic signs, as well as minor administrative/policy changes.

Funding of approximately $5000 is available within the FY19-20 Health Regulatory & Lifeguard Services budget centre (CS1004498) to create the two new permit types and amend conditions on existing permit types within the Local Government Platform (LGP).

8 RISK MANAGEMENT

There is no current corporate risk directly associated with this plan. However, as the CPP2015 is related to actions from the Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031, the following risk is noted:

Risk Number: CO00507

Risk Name: Transport Strategy is not fully funded resulting in whole of city impacts with poor transport infrastructure and transport service choices for the community.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 15 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

9 STATUTORY MATTERS

At step 1 of the subordinate local law making process, Council must, by resolution, resolve to propose to make the proposed subordinate local law. Council has complied with this requirement.

Under the Local Government Act 2009, section 38 (Anti-competitive provisions), Council must not make a local law (including a subordinate local law) that contains an anti- competitive provision unless Council has complied with the procedures prescribed under a regulation for the review of anti-competitive provisions.

Relevantly, the Local Government Regulation 2012, section 15: a defines a provision as anti-competitive if under the Competition Policy Guidelines, the provision is identified as creating a barrier to entry to a market or competition within a market; and b prescribes procedures for the review of anti-competitive provisions.

A review of Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 for anti- competitive provisions in accordance with the requirements of the Competition Policy Guidelines prescribed by regulation has been undertaken. No likely anti-competitive provisions are included in the amending subordinate local law as outlined in the list of likely anti-competitive provisions (refer Attachment ‘F’).

Council must ensure its local laws are drafted in compliance with the guidelines issued by the Parliamentary Counsel under the Legislative Standards Act 1992. The proposed subordinate local law complies with this requirement.

Council is not required to consult with the State regarding its proposal to make the subordinate local law. Council is required to consult the public regarding the proposed subordinate local law. Council has complied with this requirement.

Council may only regulate parking on State-controlled roads in its area with the written agreement of the chief executive of the Department responsible for the administration of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995. Accordingly, to the extent that Council wishes to regulate parking on State-controlled roads, Council has obtained the written agreement of the chief executive (refer Attachment ‘G’).

10 COUNCIL POLICIES

Not applicable.

11 DELEGATIONS

In accordance with the Local Government Act 2009, section 28, delegation DE2017, ‘All relevant Local Government powers contained with the provisions of Council's Local Laws and Subordinate Local Laws and Local Law Policies’ is in place and, after gazettal, sub- delegations will be created specifying the powers in this law where necessary.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 16 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION The following stakeholders have been consulted in developing the proposed Traffic Area changes:

Name and/or Title of the Directorate or Is the Stakeholder Stakeholder Consulted Organisation Satisfied With Content of Report and Recommendations (Yes/No) Rob Smith Manager Lifestyle and Community Yes Health Regulatory and Lifeguard Services

Jo Furey-Lopez Executive Coordinator Lifestyle and Community Yes Business Management and Planning

Sean Hodgson Executive Coordinator Lifestyle and Community Yes City Regulations

Peter Jasper Acting Executive Coordinator Lifestyle and Community Yes City Standards

Chris Kinnell Coordinator City Parking Lifestyle and Community Yes City Regulations

Alton Twine Transport and Yes Director Infrastructure

Tyrone Gerada Transport and Acting Manager Yes Infrastructure Transport Network Management Nick Prasser Executive Coordinator Transport and Yes Transport Policy, Planning and Infrastructure Program Donna Pistol Office of the COO Yes Senior Lawyer Nicole Waters Executive Coordinator Office of the COO Yes Corporate Communication

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS

The subordinate local law provides for quality transport related social and economic outcomes by regulating parking in Council’s local government area. The general public have had the opportunity to provide comment on the proposed subordinate local law during a 21 day public consultation period. The general public will be advised of the outcome of the consultation and Council resolution through Council’s ‘Have Your Say’ website. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 17 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

14 TIMING

Project Timelines

The amendment process of the Subordinate Local Law will be finalised upon Gazettal by the end of September 2019. The following table outlines the proposed timeframes for delivering TAPPS Stage 2:

Project Task Responsibility Completion Date Council approval of the Regulated Parking Transport & (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No.1) Infrastructure 2019 and consolidated version of September 2019 Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Lifestyle & Parking) 2006 Community Gazettal of Regulated Parking (Amendment) Lifestyle & September 2019 Subordinate Local Law (No.1) 2019 Community Lifestyle & Finalise new parking permit application Community processes, implement communication plan December 2019 and parking signage changes Transport & Infrastructure

15 CONCLUSION

It is recommended, to reduce traffic congestion in residential streets and improve access to on-street parking for residents and visitors, that Council resolve to make Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 as advertised, but amended in accordance with Attachment ‘B’, and note that the amendments are considered an insubstantial change.

It is also recommended that Council resolve to adopt, pursuant to section 32 of the Local Government Act 2009, in the form attached to this report to Council, a consolidated version of Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 18 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

16 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:

1 To make Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 as advertised, but amended as follows:- (a) section 4 (Amendment of s11 (Persons to whom parking permits may be granted—Local law, s28)), subsection (25) ‘detached resident premises parking permit’— omit, insert— ‘detached premises resident parking permit’; and (b) section 8 (Amendment of sch 1 (Dictionary)) — insert— ‘(5) Schedule 1, definition detached premises— omit, insert— ‘detached premises — (a) means— (i) a residence which is not attached to, or touching, another residence or another building; and (ii) a residence which forms part of a group of 2 residences in circumstances where 1 residence of the group is attached to, or touching, the other residence of the group; but (b) does not include a residence situated on a lot which forms part of a community titles scheme.’ 2 To adopt a consolidated version of Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006, in the form attached to this report to Council as Attachment ‘C’, in accordance with section 32 of the Local Government Act 2009. 3 That Council comply with the Local Law Making Process resolved by Council pursuant to Section 29 of the Local Government Act 2009, being Resolution No. GA16.0303.019.

Author: Authorised by: Tony Papa Alison Ewens Specialist Transport Planner Director Lifestyle & Community 20 August 2019

Co-Author: Amber Barratt Acting Senior Projects and Compliance Officer 20 August 2019

TRACKS REF: #73989403 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 19 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10)

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.002 moved Cr O'Neill seconded Cr Taylor

CARRIED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 20 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Attachment A

Regulated Parking (Amendment)

Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019

This and the following 28 pages is a certified copy of Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No .1) 2019, made in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 2009, by Council of the City of Gold Coast by resolution dated the 2019.

______Dale Dickson Chief Executive Officer

Council of the City of Gold Coast 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 21 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019

Contents

Part 1 Preliminary...... 2 1 Short title ...... 2 2 Subordinate local law amended ...... 2

Part 2 Amendments to subordinate local law ...... 2 3 Amendment of s9 (Commercial vehicle identification label conditions of approval—Local Law, s19(3))...... 2 4 Amendment of s11 (Persons to whom parking permits may be granted—Local Law, s28) ...... 2 5 Amendment of s12 (Other information to accompany a parking permit application—Local Law, s29(f)) ...... 8 6 Amendment of s13 (Term of parking permit — Local Law, s30(4)) ...... 10 7 Amendment of s14 (Conditions of parking permit—Local Law, s31(3)) ...... 10 8 Amendment of sch1 (Dictionary) ...... 14 9 Replacement of sch1A (Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area) ...... 18 10 Replacement of sch1B (Central Traffic Area) ...... 19 11 Replacement of sch1C (Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area) ...... 20 12 Replacement of sch1D (Main Beach Traffic Area) ...... 21 13 Replacement of sch1E (Robina Stadium Traffic Area) ...... 22 14 Replacement of sch1F (Southern Traffic Area) ...... 23 15 Replacement of sch1G (Southport Traffic Area) ...... 24 16 Replacement of sch1H (Stadium Residential Traffic Area) ...... 25 17 Replacement of sch1I (Varsity Lakes Traffic Area) ...... 26 18 Amendment of sch2 (Off-street regulated parking areas) ...... 27

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 22 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 2

Part 1 Preliminary

1 Short title This subordinate local law may be cited as Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019.

2 Subordinate local law amended This subordinate local law amends Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006.

Part 2 Amendments to subordinate local law

3 Amendment of s9 (Commercial vehicle identification label conditions of approval—Local Law, s19(3)) Section 9(a), after ‘to the’ — insert— ‘windscreen of the’.

4 Amendment of s11 (Persons to whom parking permits may be granted— Local Law, s28) (1) Section 11(2)(a)(i)— omit, insert— ‘(i) a person resides in multi-residential premises1 on a section of road and— (A) parking immediately adjacent to the multi-residential premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and’. (2) Section 11(2)(a)(ii)— omit, insert— ‘(ii) for the vehicle identified in the application for the permit— (A) the current registration certificate for the vehicle identifies the person as the current registered owner of the vehicle; or (B) if the person is not the current registered owner of the vehicle—the person is authorised, by the current registered owner of the vehicle, to use the vehicle on a regular and ongoing basis, and to keep or store the vehicle at the multi-residential premises identified in the application; and’. (3) After section 11(2)(a)(iii)— insert— ‘(iv) if the multi-residential premises forms part or the whole of a lot in a

1 See definition of multi-residential premises in the dictionary. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 23 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 3

community titles scheme —the scheme land for the community titles scheme has a kerb side frontage of more than 6m; and’. (4) Section 11(2)(b)(ii), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; or’. (5) After section 11(2)(b)(ii)— insert— ‘(iii) have a water connection approval date on or after 30 October 2018; or (iv) are— (A) in a multi-level building; and (B) directly or indirectly above premises within the multi-level building which are used otherwise than as a residence; or (v) are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business.’. (6) Section 11(3)(a)(i)— omit, insert— ‘(i) a person resides in detached premises on a section of road and— (A) parking immediately adjacent to the detached premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and’. (7) Section 11(3)(a)(ii)— omit, insert— ‘(ii) for the vehicle identified in the application for the permit— (A) the current registration certificate for the vehicle identifies the person as the current registered owner of the vehicle; or (B) if the person is not the current registered owner of the vehicle—the person is authorised, by the current registered owner of the vehicle, to use the vehicle on a regular and ongoing basis, and to keep or store the vehicle at the detached premises identified in the application; and’. (8) Section 11(3)(b)(ii), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; or’. (9) After section 11(3)(b)(ii)— insert— ‘(iii) have a kerb side frontage of 6m or less; or (iv) are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business.’. (10) Section 11(4)(b)(i)(B), after ‘charitable’— insert— ‘or not-for-profit’. (11) Section 11(7)(a), ‘immediately adjacent to’— 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 24 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 4

omit, insert— ‘in the vicinity of’. (12) Section 11(8)(a)— omit, insert— ‘(a) the part of the road to which the application relates— (i) is on the same side of the road as the site of proposed building or construction work; and (ii) abuts the kerb of the site of the proposed building or construction work; and’. (13) Section 11(9), ‘on an off-street’ omit, insert— ‘in a’ (14) Section 11(10)— omit, insert— ‘(10) A parking permit (a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit) may— (a) be granted in circumstances where— (i) a person (the resident) resides in multi-residential premises on a section of road and — (A) parking immediately adjacent to the multi-residential premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and (ii) the permit is to be made available by the resident for use by another person who— (A) is visiting, or attending at, the multi-residential premises; and (B) intends parking on the section of road immediately adjacent to the multi-residential premises; and (iii) the multi-residential premises do not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, an off-street parking space for use by visitors of the resident; and (iv) if the multi-residential premises forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme—the scheme land for the community titles scheme has a kerb side frontage of more than 6m; and (b) not be granted in circumstances where— (i) if the permit is granted—there would be in force more than 1 multi-residential premises visitor parking permit for the multi-residential premises; or (ii) the multi-residential premises are situated within the boundary of an Event Traffic Area; or (iii) the multi-residential premises have a water connection approval 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 25 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 5

date on or after 30 October 2018; or (iv) the multi-residential premises are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business; or (v) the multi-residential premises are— (A) in a multi-level building; and (B) directly or indirectly above premises within the multi-level building which are used otherwise than as a residence.’. (15) Section 11(11)— omit, insert— ‘(11) A parking permit (a detached premises visitor parking permit) may— (a) be granted in circumstances where— (i) a person (the resident) resides in detached premises on a section of road and— (A) parking immediately adjacent to the detached premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and (ii) the permit is to be made available by the resident for use by another person who— (A) is visiting, or attending at, the detached premises; and (B) intends parking on the section of road immediately adjacent to the detached premises; and (iii) the detached premises do not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, an off-street parking space for use by visitors of the resident; and (iv) the detached premises have a kerb side frontage of more than 6m; and (b) not be granted in circumstances where— (i) if the permit is granted—there would be in force more than 3 detached premises visitor parking permits for the detached premises; or (ii) the detached premises are situated within the boundary of an Event Traffic Area; or (iii) the detached premises are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business.’. (16) Section 11(12), from ‘that the grant of the permit’ to ‘roads.’— omit, insert— ‘that— (a) the grant of the permit— (i) is consistent with the objects of the local law; and (ii) will— 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 26 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 6

(A) promote the effective and efficient management of road use in the local government area; or (B) contribute to the strategic management of road infrastructure, and in particular, vehicle parking facilities, on roads in the local government area; or (C) protect the environment and public health, safety and amenity within built-up areas in the local government area from the adverse effects of the parking of vehicles on roads; or (b) the parking permit should be granted to a person because the person’s circumstances are as follows— (i) the person is a carer; and (ii) for the primary purpose of providing the services of a carer—the person parks, or intends parking, his or her vehicle on a section of road in the vicinity of the residence at which the services are to be provided; and (iii) if the parking permit is granted to the person in respect of the parking of a vehicle on a section of road in the vicinity of the residence—there would not be in force more than 1 special parking permit for the residence.’. (17) Section 11(13)(a)— omit, insert— ‘(a) a person resides in a residence2 situated on a section of road and— (i) parking immediately adjacent to the residence is regulated by time; but (ii) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and’. (18) Section 11(13)(d) omit, insert— ‘(d) if the resident’s event parking permit is granted — there would not be in force for the same residence (regardless of whether the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme or not), the resident’s event parking permit and any of the following — (i) a multi-residential premises resident parking permit; (ii) a detached premises resident parking permit; (iii) a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit; (iv) a detached premises visitor parking permit; and’. (19) Section 11(13)(f)— omit. (20) Section 11(13)(g), ‘a residence’— omit, insert— ‘the residence’. (21) Section 11(13)(g), ‘2.’—

2 See definition of residence in the dictionary. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 27 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 7

omit, insert— ‘2; and’. (22) Section 11(13)(g)— renumber as section 11(13)(f). (23) After section 11(13)(f)— insert— ‘(g) if the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme—the total number of residences in the community titles scheme is not more than 20.’. (24) Section 11(14)(a)— omit, insert— ‘(a) a person resides in a residence situated on a section of road and— (i) parking immediately adjacent to the residence is regulated by time; but (ii) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and’. (25) Section 11(14)(d) and (e)— omit, insert— ‘(d) if the main beach event parking permit is granted — there would not be in force for the same residence (regardless of whether the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme or not), the main beach event parking permit and any of the following— (i) a multi-residential premises resident parking permit; (ii) a detached resident premises parking permit; (iii) a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit; (iv) a detached premises visitor parking permit; and (e) if the main beach event parking permit is granted—there would not be in force— (i) if the residence does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, any off-street parking — more than 2 main beach event parking permits for the same residence; and (ii) if the residence does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, off-street parking for more than 1 vehicle — more than 1 main beach event parking permit for the residence; and (f) the number of main beach event parking permits which may be granted for a residence (other than a residence which forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme) is — (i) if the measured frontage of the residence is less than 6m – nil; (ii) if the measured frontage of the residence is 6m or more, but less than 12m— 1; (iii) if the measured frontage of the residence is 12m or more — 2; and (g) if the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 28 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 8

scheme— (i) only the body corporate for the community titles scheme may be granted a main beach event parking permit; and (ii) the maximum number of main beach event parking permits which may be granted to the body corporate is 2; and (h) if the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme—the total number of residences in the community titles scheme is not more than 20.’. (26) After section 11(14)— insert— ‘(15) A parking permit (a residential care service parking permit) may be granted to a person whose circumstances are as follows— (a) the person is a registered home care provider; and (b) for the primary purpose of carrying out the services of a registered home care provider— (i) the person parks his or her vehicle in a designated parking space and an official traffic sign for the designated parking space indicates that parking is only allowed for a specified maximum time of not less than 2 hours; and (ii) it is necessary for the person to park his or her vehicle in the designated parking space for longer than the specified maximum time indicated on the official traffic sign. (16) For the purposes of section 28 of the local law, a parking permit under subsections (2) to (15) inclusive— (a) may be granted to a person authorising the parking of a vehicle which is a motor vehicle; but (b) must not be granted to a person authorising the parking of any of the following— (i) a caravan; (ii) a long vehicle; (iii) a motorbike; (iv) a trailer; (v) a golf buggy; and (c) must not be granted to a person authorising the parking of a heavy vehicle unless the permit is a works zone parking permit.’.

5 Amendment of s12 (Other information to accompany a parking permit application—Local Law, s29(f)) (1) After section 12(1)(a) — insert— ‘(aa) if the application is for an eligible organisation parking permit — the details or information specified in subsection (2A); and’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 29 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 9

(2) After section 12(1)(d)— insert— ‘(da) if the application is for a special parking permit—the details or information specified in subsection (7A); and’. (3) Section 12(1)(aa) to (e)— renumber as paragraphs (b) to (g). (4) Section 12(1)(g), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; and’. (5) After section 12(1)(g)— insert— ‘(h) if the application is for a residential care service parking permit—the details or information specified in subsection (9).’. (6) Section 12(2)(c), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; and’. (7) After section 12(2)(c)— insert— ‘(d) if the application is for a multi-residential premises parking permit—written particulars of the kerb side frontage of the scheme land for the multi-residential premises identified in the application; and (e) if the application is for a detached premises resident parking permit—written particulars of the kerb side frontage of the detached premises identified in the application.’. (8) After section 12(2) — insert — ‘(2A) The other details or information which must accompany an application for an eligible organisation parking permit is written evidence from the eligible organisation — (a) that the eligible organisation does not have and cannot reasonably acquire adequate off-street parking; and (b) about how the permit will only be used to facilitate the parking on an off-street regulated parking area of a vehicle which is primarily used by the eligible organisation or a volunteer of the eligible organisation engaged in a charitable or not-for-profit activity of the organisation.’. (9) After section 12(7)— insert— ‘(7A) The other details or information which must accompany an application for a special parking permit is— (a) written evidence— 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 30 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 10

(i) identifying the full name, current residential address and telephone number of the applicant; and (ii) identifying the full name, current residential address and telephone number of the other person for whose benefit the applicant will provide ongoing care or assistance in the applicant’s capacity as a carer; and (b) if the applicant is recognised by, or a member of, a carers association — written evidence from the carers association that the applicant is recognised by, or a member of, the carers association; and (c) if the applicant is not recognised by, or a member of, a carers association — written evidence — (i) from the applicant, by way of statutory declaration, that the applicant provides, in a non-contractual and unpaid capacity, ongoing care and assistance to another person (the second person) who, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks; and (ii) from a medical practitioner, by way of statutory declaration, that the second person, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks.’. (10) After section 12(8)— insert— ‘(9) The other details or information which must accompany an application for a residential care service parking permit is written evidence that the registered home care provider is employed by, or contracted to, an approved home care service provider, for example, a letter from the approved home care service provider identifying the registered home care provider as an employee or contractor of the approved home care service provider.’.

6 Amendment of s13 (Term of parking permit — Local Law, s30(4)) Section 13(1) and (2)— omit, insert— ‘(1) The term for which a parking permit is granted or renewed must be determined by the local government having regard to the information submitted by the applicant for the parking permit. (2) The local government may fix a term for 1 or more parking permits if it is desirable to do so— (a) to provide common expiry dates for parking permits; or (b) for some other reason.’.

7 Amendment of s14 (Conditions of parking permit—Local Law, s31(3)) (1) Section 14(2)(a)— omit, insert— ‘(a) if the permit authorises the parking of a vehicle on a road or off-street regulated parking area—the holder of the permit must affix the permit, facing 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 31 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 11

outwards, on— (i) the windscreen on the passenger side of the vehicle; or (ii) a window on the passenger side of the vehicle; and’. (2) Section 14(2)(b), ‘.’ omit, insert — ‘; and’. (3) After section 14(2)(b) — insert — ‘(c) if a permit is a permit other than a works zone parking permit — the permit must not be used in respect of the parking of a vehicle in a designated parking space if an official traffic sign indicates that paid parking applies to the designated parking space.’. (4) After section 14(5)— insert— ‘(5A) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a temporary parking permit are— (a) it is the responsibility of the holder of the permit to ensure that all vehicles using the area of road to which the permit relates comply with all applicable provisions of each of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009 and the local laws of the local government; and (b) no construction materials or equipment of any kind may be stacked, placed, stored or otherwise left on the area of road to which the permit relates, including any road or footpath either within or outside of the area of road to which the permit relates, at any time, except where necessary to comply with a work, health and safety or operational requirement in which event the holder of the permit must also apply for, and obtain, from the local government, a permit to interfere with a road under Local Law No. 11 (Roads and Malls) 2008; and (c) unless approved in writing by the local government, the holder of the permit must not permit or allow the activity authorised by the permit to be undertaken in a manner which obstructs pedestrian movement along a footpath within or adjacent to the area of road to which the permit relates, for example, the parking of a vehicle, the loading or unloading of construction materials or equipment, or other building or construction related works or operations; and (d) the holder of the permit is solely responsible for— (i) securing the use of the area of road to which the permit relates for the activity authorised by the permit; and (ii) setting aside the area of road to which the permit relates for use by the holder of the permit by the placement of acceptable delineation devices, for example, traffic cones; and (iii) ensuring that the manner in which the holder of the permit sets 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 32 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 12

aside the area of road to which the permit relates complies with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 3 – Works on Roads and AS1742 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (including AS1742.3-2009 Traffic control devices for works on roads); and (e) the holder of the permit must contact the local government before undertaking the activity authorised by the permit to advise of the undertaking of the activity at the area of road to which the permit relates; and (f) the holder of the permit must pay to the local government, on demand, a use fee in respect of the use of the area of road to which the permit relates for the activity authorised by the permit; and (g) the holder of the permit must clearly display a copy of the permit whilst a vehicle of the holder is parked within the area of road to which the permit relates.’. (5) Section 14(6)— omit, insert— ‘(6) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a works zone parking permit are— (a) it is the responsibility of the holder of the permit to ensure that all vehicles using the works zone identified in the permit comply with all applicable provisions of each of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009 and the local laws of the local government; and (b) no construction materials or equipment of any kind may be stacked, placed, stored or otherwise left on the works zone, including any road or footpath either within or outside of the works zone, at any time, except where necessary to comply with a work, health and safety or operational requirement, in which event the holder of the permit must also apply for, and obtain, from the local government, a permit to interfere with a road under Local Law No. 11 (Roads and Malls) 2008; and (c) the holder of the permit must not permit or allow the activity authorised by the permit to be undertaken in a manner which obstructs pedestrian movement along a footpath within or adjacent to the works zone, for example, the parking of a vehicle, the loading or unloading of construction materials or equipment, or other building or construction related works or operations; and (d) the holder of the permit must not permit or allow a vehicle to be parked within the works zone except while it is being loaded or unloaded in connection with the activity authorised by the permit; and (e) the holder of the permit is solely responsible for— (i) securing the use of the area of road to which the permit relates for the activity authorised by the permit; and (ii) setting aside the area of road to which the permit relates for use 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 33 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 13

by the holder of the permit by the placement of acceptable delineation devices, for example, traffic cones; and (iii) ensuring that the manner in which the holder of the permit sets aside the area of road to which the permit relates complies with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 3 – Works on Roads and AS1742 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (including AS1742.3-2009 Traffic control devices for works on roads); and (f) the holder of the permit must contact the local government before undertaking the activity authorised by the permit to advise of the undertaking of the activity at the works zone; and (g) the holder of the permit must pay to the local government, on demand— (i) the fee prescribed by the local government, as determined by the local government, for the installation of official traffic signs, and other signs and markings, as determined by the local government to be appropriate, to identify the boundaries of the works zone; and (ii) a use fee, for the use of the works zone, for the purpose of undertaking the activity authorised by the permit; and (h) the local government may change a condition of the permit, for example, a change to the hours of operation of the activity authorised by the permit or the location or size of the works zone; and (i) the holder of the permit must, not later than 7 days prior to the expiry date of the permit— (i) apply to the local government for renewal of the permit; or (ii) give written notice to the local government of the expiry of the permit on the expiry date.’. (6) Section 14(9)(c), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; and’. (7) After section 14(9)(c)— insert— ‘(d) if the permit is granted under section 11(12)(b)— (i) the permit must only be used by the holder of the permit if the holder is actively engaged in providing the services of a carer— (A) for another person identified in the application for the permit; and (B) at the address of the residence of the other person identified in the application for the permit; and (ii) the permit is not specific to any particular vehicle; and (iii) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle at the location identified in the permit, which must be in the vicinity of the residence identified in the permit.’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 34 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 14

(8) After section 14(11)— insert— ‘(12) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a residential care service parking permit are— (a) the permit must only be used by the holder of the permit if— (i) the holder is actively engaged in the carrying out of the services of a registered home care provider; and (ii) the holder parks his or her vehicle in a designated parking space and an official traffic sign for the designated parking space indicates that parking is only allowed for a specified maximum time of not less than 2 hours; and (iii) it is necessary for the holder to park his or her vehicle in the designated parking space for longer than the specified maximum time indicated on the official traffic sign; and (b) the permit is specific to the vehicle identified in the permit; and (c) the permit must not be used in respect of the parking of a vehicle in a designated parking space if an official traffic sign indicates that paid parking applies to the designated parking space.’.

8 Amendment of sch1 (Dictionary) (1) Schedule 1, definition multi-residential premises, paragraph (a), ‘2 or more’— omit, insert— ‘3 or more’. (2) Schedule 1, definition multi-residential premises, paragraph (c)— omit, insert— ‘(c) does not include a residence in a multi-level building (including a high rise building, a medium rise building and a low rise building) or a community titles scheme (regardless of whether the community titles scheme is a multi- level building or not) if the total number of residences in the multi-level building or community titles scheme is — (i) if the multi-level building or community titles scheme is in the Central Traffic Area or the Southport Traffic Area— more than 30; (ii) if the multi-level building or community titles scheme is in a traffic area other than the Central Traffic Area or the Southport Traffic Area — more than 20.’. (3) Schedule 1, definition garage address— omit. (4) Schedule 1— insert— ‘approved home care service provider means a person who is an approved provider under the Aged Care Act 1997 for a home care service. caravan has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 35 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 15

Management – Vehicle Registration) Regulation 2010, schedule 8. carer— (a) means a person (the first person) who provides, in a non-contractual and unpaid capacity, ongoing care or assistance to another person (the second person) who, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks; but (b) the first person may only be a carer if— (i) the ongoing care or assistance provided by the first person to the second person is recognised, in writing, by a carers association; or (ii) the first person delivers to the local government written evidence, from a medical practitioner, by way of statutory declaration, that the second person, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks; and (c) despite paragraphs (a) and (b)—if the first person and the second person reside in the same residence, the first person is not a carer for the second person for the purposes of the local law. carers association means— (a) Carers Queensland Limited ABN 20 061 257 725; and (b) another corporation or incorporated association which— (i) has objects similar to the objects of the corporation referred to in paragraph (a); and (ii) is recognised for the purposes of the local law by the local government. heavy vehicle has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. home based business has the meaning given in the planning scheme of the local government. kerb side frontage— (a) of detached premises, means the length, measured in metres, along the alignment of the detached premises abutting a road, but excluding each of the following— (i) the width of the driveway of the detached premises abutting the road; and (ii) any part of the road on which the driver of a vehicle must not stop because, for example— (A) the side of the road is marked with a continuous yellow edge line; or (B) a no stopping sign applies to the part of the road; or (C) under the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009, a driver must not stop at the place, or on the part of the road; (b) of scheme land for a community titles scheme, means the length, measured in metres, along the alignment of the scheme land abutting a road, but excluding each of the following— 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 36 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 16

(i) the width of any driveway of the scheme land; and (ii) any part of the road on which the driver of a vehicle must not stop because, for example— (A) the side of the road is marked with a continuous yellow edge line; or (B) a no stopping sign applies to the part of the road; or (C) under the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009, a driver must not stop at the place, or on the part of the road. long vehicle has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009, section 200. lot has the meaning given in the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997. main beach event parking permit see section 11(14). medical practitioner means a person — (a) in Queensland, under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (Queensland) in the medical profession; or

(b) in New South Wales, under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) in the medical profession. motorbike has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. motor vehicle has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. off-street parking, for premises, including multi-residential premises and detached premises, includes— (a) any space within, or partly within, a building, including a residence, which is set aside for, used, or intended to be used, for the parking of 1 or more vehicles, for example, a garage or carport, usually on the ground level of, or adjacent to, the building; and (b) any space within, or partly within, a building, including a residence, to the extent that an approval has been granted in respect of the use of the space for the parking of 1 or more vehicles, but the space is used for a purpose other than the parking of 1 or more vehicles, for example, a garage which forms part of a residence, but the garage has been converted so that the garage may be used for a residential or non-parking purpose. parking immediately adjacent, to premises, including multi-residential premises and detached premises, means parking on a road, but only— (a) on the same side of the road as the premises; and (b) where the kerb of the road abuts— (i) if the premises are multi-residential premises — the scheme land of the community titles scheme for the multi-residential premises; (ii) if the premises are detached premises — the detached premises. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 37 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 17

registered home care provider means a person who is an employee or contractor of an approved home care service provider. residential care service parking permit see section 11(15). scheme land has the meaning given in the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997. trailer has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. water connection approval date means— (a) for compliance assessable work at multi-residential premises that is, under the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2002, the testing and commissioning of a cold water service, a heated water service and a sanitary plumbing or drainage installation—the date on which the responsible person for the compliance assessable work gives the local government a compliance report for the multi-residential premises which states that the plumbing and drainage for the multi-residential premises— (i) complies with the applied provision; and (ii) otherwise complies with the requirements of section 22 of the Standard Plumbing and Drainage Regulation 2003; (b) if paragraph (a) does not apply because of the commencement of the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2018—1 July 2019.’.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 38 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 18

9 Replacement of sch1A (Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area) Schedule 1A— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1A Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 39 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 19

10 Replacement of sch1B (Central Traffic Area) Schedule 1B— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1B Central Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 40 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 20

11 Replacement of sch1C (Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area) Schedule 1C— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1C Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 41 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 21

12 Replacement of sch1D (Main Beach Traffic Area) Schedule 1D— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1D Main Beach Traffic Area section 5

’.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 42 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 22

13 Replacement of sch1E (Robina Stadium Traffic Area) Schedule 1E— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1E Robina Stadium Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 43 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 23

14 Replacement of sch1F (Southern Traffic Area) Schedule 1F— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1F Southern Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 44 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 24

15 Replacement of sch1G (Southport Traffic Area) Schedule 1G— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1G Southport Traffic Area section 5

’.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 45 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 25

16 Replacement of sch1H (Stadium Residential Traffic Area) Schedule 1H— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1H Stadium Residential Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 46 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 26

17 Replacement of sch1I (Varsity Lakes Traffic Area) Schedule 1I— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1I Varsity Lakes Traffic Area section 5

’.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 47 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 27

18 Amendment of sch2 (Off-street regulated parking areas) (1) Schedule 2, part 1— insert— ‘ AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 64. Lot 727 on Registered Plan Crocker Park Carpark, 92 Markeri 144986 Street, Mermaid Waters 65. Lot 30 on Registered Plan 841205 Ken Mansbridge Park Carpark, 177 Hedges Avenue, Mermaid Beach 66. Lot 238 on Plan WD4321 Palm Beach Aquatic Centre Carpark, Thrower Drive, Palm Beach 67. Lot 995 on Survey Plan 190851 Harbour Town North Park, East Quay Drive, Biggera Waters ’. (2) Schedule 2 part 3, areas numbered 4, 9, 10, 14, 15, 22 and 28 — omit. (3) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 12, ‘ramp’ — omit, insert — ‘ramps’. (4) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 13, from ‘at’ to ‘Pool’ — omit, insert — ‘opposite North Street, Southport’. (5) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 16, ‘ramp’ — omit, insert — ‘ramps’. (6) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 23, from ‘Livistonia’ to ‘Broadwater’ — omit, insert— ‘Cabbage Tree Point Road on Southern Moreton Bay’. (7) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 26, after ‘on’ — insert — ‘Southern’. (8) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 27, ‘Landing’ — omit, insert — ‘Boat’. (9) Schedule 2, part 3, areas numbered 5 to 30 — renumber as areas numbered 4 to 23. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 48 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 28

(10) Schedule 2, part 3, after area number 23 — insert — ‘ AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 24. Boat ramp at Watersports Lane, Oxenford (next to the M1)

25. Boat ramp at Alberton Road, Alberton

26. Boat ramp at Tallawood Road, Coomera

27. Boat ramp at Colman Road, Coomera

28. Boat ramp at Gawler Place, Upper Coomera

29. Boat ramp at Howard Street, Runaway Bay

30. Boat ramp at Ray Street, Runaway Bay ’.

#72306903 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 49 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Attachment B

Regulated Parking (Amendment)

Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019

______Dale Dickson Chief Executive Officer

Council of the City of Gold Coast 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 50 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019

Contents

Part 1 Preliminary...... 2 1 Short title ...... 2 2 Subordinate local law amended ...... 2

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 51 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 2

Part 1 Preliminary

1 Short title This subordinate local law may be cited as Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019.

2 Subordinate local law amended This subordinate local law amends Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006.

Part 2 Amendments to subordinate local law

3 Amendment of s9 (Commercial vehicle identification label conditions of approval—Local Law, s19(3)) Section 9(a), after ‘to the’ — insert— ‘windscreen of the’.

1 See definition of multi-residential premises in the dictionary. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 52 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 3

community titles scheme —the scheme land for the community titles scheme has a kerb side frontage of more than 6m; and’. (4) Section 11(2)(b)(ii), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; or’. (5) After section 11(2)(b)(ii)— insert— ‘(iii) have a water connection approval date on or after 30 October 2018; or (iv) are— (A) in a multi-level building; and (B) directly or indirectly above premises within the multi-level building which are used otherwise than as a residence; or (v) are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business.’. (6) Section 11(3)(a)(i)— omit, insert— ‘(i) a person resides in detached premises on a section of road and— (A) parking immediately adjacent to the detached premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and’. (7) Section 11(3)(a)(ii)— omit, insert— ‘(ii) for the vehicle identified in the application for the permit— (A) the current registration certificate for the vehicle identifies the person as the current registered owner of the vehicle; or (B) if the person is not the current registered owner of the vehicle—the person is authorised, by the current registered owner of the vehicle, to use the vehicle on a regular and ongoing basis, and to keep or store the vehicle at the detached premises identified in the application; and’. (8) Section 11(3)(b)(ii), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; or’. (9) After section 11(3)(b)(ii)— insert— ‘(iii) have a kerb side frontage of 6m or less; or (iv) are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business.’. (10) Section 11(4)(b)(i)(B), after ‘charitable’— insert— ‘or not-for-profit’. (11) Section 11(7)(a), ‘immediately adjacent to’— 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 53 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 4

omit, insert— ‘in the vicinity of’. (12) Section 11(8)(a)— omit, insert— ‘(a) the part of the road to which the application relates— (i) is on the same side of the road as the site of proposed building or construction work; and (ii) abuts the kerb of the site of the proposed building or construction work; and’. (13) Section 11(9), ‘on an off-street’ omit, insert— ‘in a’ (14) Section 11(10)— omit, insert— ‘(10) A parking permit (a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit) may— (a) be granted in circumstances where— (i) a person (the resident) resides in multi-residential premises on a section of road and — (A) parking immediately adjacent to the multi-residential premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and (ii) the permit is to be made available by the resident for use by another person who— (A) is visiting, or attending at, the multi-residential premises; and (B) intends parking on the section of road immediately adjacent to the multi-residential premises; and (iii) the multi-residential premises do not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, an off-street parking space for use by visitors of the resident; and (iv) if the multi-residential premises forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme—the scheme land for the community titles scheme has a kerb side frontage of more than 6m; and (b) not be granted in circumstances where— (i) if the permit is granted—there would be in force more than 1 multi-residential premises visitor parking permit for the multi-residential premises; or (ii) the multi-residential premises are situated within the boundary of an Event Traffic Area; or (iii) the multi-residential premises have a water connection approval 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 54 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 5

date on or after 30 October 2018; or (iv) the multi-residential premises are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business; or (v) the multi-residential premises are— (A) in a multi-level building; and (B) directly or indirectly above premises within the multi-level building which are used otherwise than as a residence.’. (15) Section 11(11)— omit, insert— ‘(11) A parking permit (a detached premises visitor parking permit) may— (a) be granted in circumstances where— (i) a person (the resident) resides in detached premises on a section of road and— (A) parking immediately adjacent to the detached premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and (ii) the permit is to be made available by the resident for use by another person who— (A) is visiting, or attending at, the detached premises; and (B) intends parking on the section of road immediately adjacent to the detached premises; and (iii) the detached premises do not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, an off-street parking space for use by visitors of the resident; and (iv) the detached premises have a kerb side frontage of more than 6m; and (b) not be granted in circumstances where— (i) if the permit is granted—there would be in force more than 3 detached premises visitor parking permits for the detached premises; or (ii) the detached premises are situated within the boundary of an Event Traffic Area; or (iii) the detached premises are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business.’. (16) Section 11(12), from ‘that the grant of the permit’ to ‘roads.’— omit, insert— ‘that— (a) the grant of the permit— (i) is consistent with the objects of the local law; and (ii) will— 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 55 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 6

2 See definition of residence in the dictionary. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 56 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 7

omit, insert— ‘2; and’. (22) Section 11(13)(g)— renumber as section 11(13)(f). (23) After section 11(13)(f)— insert— ‘(g) if the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme—the total number of residences in the community titles scheme is not more than 20.’. (24) Section 11(14)(a)— omit, insert— ‘(a) a person resides in a residence situated on a section of road and— (i) parking immediately adjacent to the residence is regulated by time; but (ii) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and’. (25) Section 11(14)(d) and (e)— omit, insert— ‘(d) if the main beach event parking permit is granted — there would not be in force for the same residence (regardless of whether the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme or not), the main beach event parking permit and any of the following— (i) a multi-residential premises resident parking permit; (ii) a detached premises resident premises parking permit; (iii) a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit; (iv) a detached premises visitor parking permit; and (e) if the main beach event parking permit is granted—there would not be in force— (i) if the residence does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, any off-street parking — more than 2 main beach event parking permits for the same residence; and (ii) if the residence does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, off-street parking for more than 1 vehicle — more than 1 main beach event parking permit for the residence; and (f) the number of main beach event parking permits which may be granted for a residence (other than a residence which forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme) is — (i) if the measured frontage of the residence is less than 6m – nil; (ii) if the measured frontage of the residence is 6m or more, but less than 12m— 1; (iii) if the measured frontage of the residence is 12m or more — 2; and (g) if the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 57 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 8

5 Amendment of s12 (Other information to accompany a parking permit application—Local Law, s29(f)) (1) After section 12(1)(a) — insert— ‘(aa) if the application is for an eligible organisation parking permit — the details or information specified in subsection (2A); and’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 58 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 9

(2) After section 12(1)(d)— insert— ‘(da) if the application is for a special parking permit—the details or information specified in subsection (7A); and’. (3) Section 12(1)(aa) to (e)— renumber as paragraphs (b) to (g). (4) Section 12(1)(g), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; and’. (5) After section 12(1)(g)— insert— ‘(h) if the application is for a residential care service parking permit—the details or information specified in subsection (9).’. (6) Section 12(2)(c), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; and’. (7) After section 12(2)(c)— insert— ‘(d) if the application is for a multi-residential premises parking permit—written particulars of the kerb side frontage of the scheme land for the multi-residential premises identified in the application; and (e) if the application is for a detached premises resident parking permit—written particulars of the kerb side frontage of the detached premises identified in the application.’. (8) After section 12(2) — insert — ‘(2A) The other details or information which must accompany an application for an eligible organisation parking permit is written evidence from the eligible organisation — (a) that the eligible organisation does not have and cannot reasonably acquire adequate off-street parking; and (b) about how the permit will only be used to facilitate the parking on an off-street regulated parking area of a vehicle which is primarily used by the eligible organisation or a volunteer of the eligible organisation engaged in a charitable or not-for-profit activity of the organisation.’. (9) After section 12(7)— insert— ‘(7A) The other details or information which must accompany an application for a special parking permit is— (a) written evidence— 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 59 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 10

7 Amendment of s14 (Conditions of parking permit—Local Law, s31(3)) (1) Section 14(2)(a)— omit, insert— ‘(a) if the permit authorises the parking of a vehicle on a road or off-street regulated parking area—the holder of the permit must affix the permit, facing 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 60 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 11

outwards, on— (i) the windscreen on the passenger side of the vehicle; or (ii) a window on the passenger side of the vehicle; and’. (2) Section 14(2)(b), ‘.’ omit, insert — ‘; and’. (3) After section 14(2)(b) — insert — ‘(c) if a permit is a permit other than a works zone parking permit — the permit must not be used in respect of the parking of a vehicle in a designated parking space if an official traffic sign indicates that paid parking applies to the designated parking space.’. (4) After section 14(5)— insert— ‘(5A) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a temporary parking permit are— (a) it is the responsibility of the holder of the permit to ensure that all vehicles using the area of road to which the permit relates comply with all applicable provisions of each of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009 and the local laws of the local government; and (b) no construction materials or equipment of any kind may be stacked, placed, stored or otherwise left on the area of road to which the permit relates, including any road or footpath either within or outside of the area of road to which the permit relates, at any time, except where necessary to comply with a work, health and safety or operational requirement in which event the holder of the permit must also apply for, and obtain, from the local government, a permit to interfere with a road under Local Law No. 11 (Roads and Malls) 2008; and (c) unless approved in writing by the local government, the holder of the permit must not permit or allow the activity authorised by the permit to be undertaken in a manner which obstructs pedestrian movement along a footpath within or adjacent to the area of road to which the permit relates, for example, the parking of a vehicle, the loading or unloading of construction materials or equipment, or other building or construction related works or operations; and (d) the holder of the permit is solely responsible for— (i) securing the use of the area of road to which the permit relates for the activity authorised by the permit; and (ii) setting aside the area of road to which the permit relates for use by the holder of the permit by the placement of acceptable delineation devices, for example, traffic cones; and (iii) ensuring that the manner in which the holder of the permit sets 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 61 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 12

aside the area of road to which the permit relates complies with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 3 – Works on Roads and AS1742 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (including AS1742.3-2009 Traffic control devices for works on roads); and (e) the holder of the permit must contact the local government before undertaking the activity authorised by the permit to advise of the undertaking of the activity at the area of road to which the permit relates; and (f) the holder of the permit must pay to the local government, on demand, a use fee in respect of the use of the area of road to which the permit relates for the activity authorised by the permit; and (g) the holder of the permit must clearly display a copy of the permit whilst a vehicle of the holder is parked within the area of road to which the permit relates.’. (5) Section 14(6)— omit, insert— ‘(6) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a works zone parking permit are— (a) it is the responsibility of the holder of the permit to ensure that all vehicles using the works zone identified in the permit comply with all applicable provisions of each of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009 and the local laws of the local government; and (b) no construction materials or equipment of any kind may be stacked, placed, stored or otherwise left on the works zone, including any road or footpath either within or outside of the works zone, at any time, except where necessary to comply with a work, health and safety or operational requirement, in which event the holder of the permit must also apply for, and obtain, from the local government, a permit to interfere with a road under Local Law No. 11 (Roads and Malls) 2008; and (c) the holder of the permit must not permit or allow the activity authorised by the permit to be undertaken in a manner which obstructs pedestrian movement along a footpath within or adjacent to the works zone, for example, the parking of a vehicle, the loading or unloading of construction materials or equipment, or other building or construction related works or operations; and (d) the holder of the permit must not permit or allow a vehicle to be parked within the works zone except while it is being loaded or unloaded in connection with the activity authorised by the permit; and (e) the holder of the permit is solely responsible for— (i) securing the use of the area of road to which the permit relates for the activity authorised by the permit; and (ii) setting aside the area of road to which the permit relates for use 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 62 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 13

by the holder of the permit by the placement of acceptable delineation devices, for example, traffic cones; and (iii) ensuring that the manner in which the holder of the permit sets aside the area of road to which the permit relates complies with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 3 – Works on Roads and AS1742 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (including AS1742.3-2009 Traffic control devices for works on roads); and (f) the holder of the permit must contact the local government before undertaking the activity authorised by the permit to advise of the undertaking of the activity at the works zone; and (g) the holder of the permit must pay to the local government, on demand— (i) the fee prescribed by the local government, as determined by the local government, for the installation of official traffic signs, and other signs and markings, as determined by the local government to be appropriate, to identify the boundaries of the works zone; and (ii) a use fee, for the use of the works zone, for the purpose of undertaking the activity authorised by the permit; and (h) the local government may change a condition of the permit, for example, a change to the hours of operation of the activity authorised by the permit or the location or size of the works zone; and (i) the holder of the permit must, not later than 7 days prior to the expiry date of the permit— (i) apply to the local government for renewal of the permit; or (ii) give written notice to the local government of the expiry of the permit on the expiry date.’. (6) Section 14(9)(c), ‘.’— omit, insert— ‘; and’. (7) After section 14(9)(c)— insert— ‘(d) if the permit is granted under section 11(12)(b)— (i) the permit must only be used by the holder of the permit if the holder is actively engaged in providing the services of a carer— (A) for another person identified in the application for the permit; and (B) at the address of the residence of the other person identified in the application for the permit; and (ii) the permit is not specific to any particular vehicle; and (iii) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle at the location identified in the permit, which must be in the vicinity of the residence identified in the permit.’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 63 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 14

8 Amendment of sch1 (Dictionary) (1) Schedule 1, definition multi-residential premises, paragraph (a), ‘2 or more’— omit, insert— ‘3 or more’. (2) Schedule 1, definition multi-residential premises, paragraph (c)— omit, insert— ‘(c) does not include a residence in a multi-level building (including a high rise building, a medium rise building and a low rise building) or a community titles scheme (regardless of whether the community titles scheme is a multi- level building or not) if the total number of residences in the multi-level building or community titles scheme is — (i) if the multi-level building or community titles scheme is in the Central Traffic Area or the Southport Traffic Area— more than 30; (ii) if the multi-level building or community titles scheme is in a traffic area other than the Central Traffic Area or the Southport Traffic Area — more than 20.’. (3) Schedule 1, definition garage address— omit. (4) Schedule 1— insert— ‘approved home care service provider means a person who is an approved provider under the Aged Care Act 1997 for a home care service. caravan has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 64 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 15

Management – Vehicle Registration) Regulation 2010, schedule 8. carer— (a) means a person (the first person) who provides, in a non-contractual and unpaid capacity, ongoing care or assistance to another person (the second person) who, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks; but (b) the first person may only be a carer if— (i) the ongoing care or assistance provided by the first person to the second person is recognised, in writing, by a carers association; or (ii) the first person delivers to the local government written evidence, from a medical practitioner, by way of statutory declaration, that the second person, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks; and (c) despite paragraphs (a) and (b)—if the first person and the second person reside in the same residence, the first person is not a carer for the second person for the purposes of the local law. carers association means— (a) Carers Queensland Limited ABN 20 061 257 725; and (b) another corporation or incorporated association which— (i) has objects similar to the objects of the corporation referred to in paragraph (a); and (ii) is recognised for the purposes of the local law by the local government. heavy vehicle has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. home based business has the meaning given in the planning scheme of the local government. kerb side frontage— (a) of detached premises, means the length, measured in metres, along the alignment of the detached premises abutting a road, but excluding each of the following— (i) the width of the driveway of the detached premises abutting the road; and (ii) any part of the road on which the driver of a vehicle must not stop because, for example— (A) the side of the road is marked with a continuous yellow edge line; or (B) a no stopping sign applies to the part of the road; or (C) under the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009, a driver must not stop at the place, or on the part of the road; (b) of scheme land for a community titles scheme, means the length, measured in metres, along the alignment of the scheme land abutting a road, but excluding each of the following— 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 65 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 16

(b) in New South Wales, under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) in the medical profession. motorbike has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. motor vehicle has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. off-street parking, for premises, including multi-residential premises and detached premises, includes— (a) any space within, or partly within, a building, including a residence, which is set aside for, used, or intended to be used, for the parking of 1 or more vehicles, for example, a garage or carport, usually on the ground level of, or adjacent to, the building; and (b) any space within, or partly within, a building, including a residence, to the extent that an approval has been granted in respect of the use of the space for the parking of 1 or more vehicles, but the space is used for a purpose other than the parking of 1 or more vehicles, for example, a garage which forms part of a residence, but the garage has been converted so that the garage may be used for a residential or non-parking purpose. parking immediately adjacent, to premises, including multi-residential premises and detached premises, means parking on a road, but only— (a) on the same side of the road as the premises; and (b) where the kerb of the road abuts— (i) if the premises are multi-residential premises — the scheme land of the community titles scheme for the multi-residential premises; (ii) if the premises are detached premises — the detached premises. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 66 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 17

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 67 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 18

9 Replacement of sch1A (Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area) Schedule 1A— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1A Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 68 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 19

10 Replacement of sch1B (Central Traffic Area) Schedule 1B— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1B Central Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 69 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 20

11 Replacement of sch1C (Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area) Schedule 1C— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1C Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 70 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 21

12 Replacement of sch1D (Main Beach Traffic Area) Schedule 1D— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1D Main Beach Traffic Area section 5

’.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 71 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 22

13 Replacement of sch1E (Robina Stadium Traffic Area) Schedule 1E— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1E Robina Stadium Traffic Area section 5

’.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 72 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 23

14 Replacement of sch1F (Southern Traffic Area) Schedule 1F— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1F Southern Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 73 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 24

15 Replacement of sch1G (Southport Traffic Area) Schedule 1G— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1G Southport Traffic Area section 5

’.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 74 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 25

16 Replacement of sch1H (Stadium Residential Traffic Area) Schedule 1H— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1H Stadium Residential Traffic Area section 5

’. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 75 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 26

17 Replacement of sch1I (Varsity Lakes Traffic Area) Schedule 1I— omit, insert— ‘Schedule 1I Varsity Lakes Traffic Area section 5

’.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 76 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 27

18 Amendment of sch2 (Off-street regulated parking areas) (1) Schedule 2, part 1— insert— ‘ AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 64. Lot 727 on Registered Plan Crocker Park Carpark, 92 Markeri 144986 Street, Mermaid Waters 65. Lot 30 on Registered Plan 841205 Ken Mansbridge Park Carpark, 177 Hedges Avenue, Mermaid Beach 66. Lot 238 on Plan WD4321 Palm Beach Aquatic Centre Carpark, Thrower Drive, Palm Beach 67. Lot 995 on Survey Plan 190851 Harbour Town North Park, East Quay Drive, Biggera Waters ’. (2) Schedule 2 part 3, areas numbered 4, 9, 10, 14, 15, 22 and 28 — omit. (3) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 12, ‘ramp’ — omit, insert — ‘ramps’. (4) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 13, from ‘at’ to ‘Pool’ — omit, insert — ‘opposite North Street, Southport’. (5) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 16, ‘ramp’ — omit, insert — ‘ramps’. (6) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 23, from ‘Livistonia’ to ‘Broadwater’ — omit, insert— ‘Cabbage Tree Point Road on Southern Moreton Bay’. (7) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 26, after ‘on’ — insert — ‘Southern’. (8) Schedule 2, part 3, area number 27, ‘Landing’ — omit, insert — ‘Boat’. (9) Schedule 2, part 3, areas numbered 5 to 30 — renumber as areas numbered 4 to 23. 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 77 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019 28

(10) Schedule 2, part 3, after area number 23 — insert — ‘ AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 24. Boat ramp at Watersports Lane, Oxenford (next to the M1)

25. Boat ramp at Alberton Road, Alberton

26. Boat ramp at Tallawood Road, Coomera

27. Boat ramp at Colman Road, Coomera

28. Boat ramp at Gawler Place, Upper Coomera

29. Boat ramp at Howard Street, Runaway Bay

30. Boat ramp at Ray Street, Runaway Bay ’.

#72306903 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 78 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Attachment C

Subordinate Local Law No. 2

(Regulated Parking) 2006

Consolidated Version

This and the following 49 pages is a certified copy of the CONSOLIDATED VERSION of Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 adopted in accordance with the provisions of section 32 of the Local Government Act 2009 by Council of the City of Gold Coast by resolution dated 20 September 2019.

……………………………………………… Dale Dickson Chief Executive Officer

Council of the City of Gold Coast 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 79 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 Contents

Part 1 Preliminary 1 1 Short title ...... 1 2 Object ...... 1 3 Definitions—the dictionary ...... 1 4 Subordinate local law repeal ...... 1

Part 2 Regulation of parking 2 5 Declaration of traffic areaLocal Law, s7(1) ...... 2 6 Off-street regulated parking areasLocal Law, s11(1) ...... 2

Part 3 Commercial vehicle identification labels 2 7 Classification of commercial vehiclesLocal Law, s16(1) ...... 2 8 Other information to accompany a commercial vehicle identification label application  Local Law, s17(h) ...... 3 9 Commercial vehicle identification label conditions of approval  Local Law, s19(3) ...... 3 10 Term of approval for commercial vehicle identification label  Local Law, s20(2)3

Part 4 Parking permits 4 11 Persons to whom parking permits may be granted  Local Law, s28 ...... 4 12 Other information to accompany a parking permit applicationLocal Law, s29(f) 11 13 Term of parking permit  Local Law, s30(4) ...... 14 14 Conditions of parking permit  Local Law, s31(3) ...... 14

Part 5 Minor traffic offence infringement notice penalties 19 15 Infringement notice penalty amounts—Local Law, s36(1) ...... 19 Schedule 1 Dictionary ...... 20 Schedule 1A Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area ...... 26 Schedule 1B Central Traffic Area ...... 27 Schedule 1C Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area ...... 28 Schedule 1D Main Beach Traffic Area ...... 29 Schedule 1E Robina Stadium Traffic Area ...... 30 Schedule 1F Southern Traffic Area ...... 31 Schedule 1G Southport Traffic Area ...... 32

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 80 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Schedule 1h stadium residential traffic area ...... 33 Schedule 1i varsity lakes traffic area ...... 34 Schedule 2 Off-street regulated parking areas ...... 35 Schedule 3 Infringement notice penalty unit amounts for certain minor traffic offences ...... 44

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 81 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 1

Part 1 Preliminary

1 Short title This subordinate local law may be cited as Subordinate Local Law No.2 (Regulated Parking) 2006.

2 Object (1) The object of this subordinate local law is to supplement Gold Coast City Council Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 to establish a comprehensive legislative scheme. (2) The objects of the legislative scheme are to (a) regulate parking on roads in the local government’s area; and (b) define the boundaries of traffic areas in the local government’s area; and (c) give the local government power to (i) issue commercial vehicle identification labels and parking permits; and (ii) impose temporary parking prohibitions and restrictions; and (d) protect the safety, environment and amenity of land in built-up areas from the adverse effects of the parking of vehicles on roads; and Examples of adverse effects— 1. Noise, including the use of air start mechanisms and air compression braking which have a detrimental effect on the amenity of an area; 2. Parking and the use of roads for access and egress purposes could create a safety risk to road users, pedestrians or residents; 3. The parking of vehicles on a road on an ongoing or long term basis may have a detrimental impact on the amenity of an area. (e) specify off-street regulated parking areas in the local government’s area; and (f) prescribe infringement notice penalties for minor traffic offences committed in the local government’s area.

3 Definitions—the dictionary The dictionary in schedule 1 defines particular words used in this subordinate local law. 4 Subordinate local law repeal This subordinate local law repeals Gold Coast City Council Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking).

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 82 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 2

Part 2 Regulation of parking

5 Declaration of traffic areaLocal Law, s7(1) For the purposes of section 7(1) of the local law— (a) the area indicated by a bold line circumscribing an area shaded in grey on the map in schedule 1A is declared to be a traffic area and the name of the traffic area is the “Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area”; and (b) the area indicated by a bold line circumscribing an area shaded in grey on the map in schedule 1B is declared to be a traffic area and the name of the traffic area is the “Central Traffic Area”; and (c) the area indicated by a bold line circumscribing an area shaded in grey on the map in schedule 1C is declared to be a traffic area and the name of the traffic area is the “Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area”; and (d) the area indicated by a bold line circumscribing an area shaded in grey on the map in schedule 1D is declared to be a traffic area and the name of the traffic area is the “Main Beach Traffic Area”; and (e) the area indicated by a bold line circumscribing an area shaded in grey on the map in schedule 1E is declared to be a traffic area and the name of the traffic area is the “Robina Stadium Traffic Area”; and (f) the area indicated by a bold line circumscribing an area shaded in grey on the map in schedule 1F is declared to be a traffic area and the name of the traffic area is the “Southern Traffic Area”; and (g) the area indicated by a bold line circumscribing an area shaded in grey on the map in schedule 1G is declared to be a traffic area and the name of the traffic area is the “Southport Traffic Area”; and (h) the area indicated by a bold line circumscribing an area shaded in grey on the map in schedule 1H is declared to be a traffic area and the name of the traffic area is the “Stadium Residential Traffic Area”; and (i) the area indicated by a bold line circumscribing an area shaded in grey on the map in schedule 1I is declared to be a traffic area and the name of the traffic area is the “Varsity Lakes Traffic Area”.

6 Off-street regulated parking areasLocal Law, s11(1) For the purposes of section 11(1) of the local law, the areas of land (including structures on the land) described in schedule 2 are defined as off-street regulated parking areas.

Part 3 Commercial vehicle identification labels

7 Classification of commercial vehicles1ALocal Law, s16(1)

1A A local government may regulate parking by installing official traffic signs indicating how parking is

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 83 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 3

For the purposes of section 16(1) of the local law, each of the following vehicles is classified as a commercial vehicle (a) any horse drawn vehicle constructed, fitted or equipped for the carriage of goods; (b) any motor vehicle if— (i) the motor vehicle is constructed, fitted or equipped for the carriage of persons; and (ii) the current registration certificate for the motor vehicle states that the purpose of use of the vehicle is commercial use.

8 Other information to accompany a commercial vehicle identification label application  Local Law, s17(h) The other detail or information which must accompany an application for approval to obtain a commercial vehicle identification label is a copy of a current registration certificate for the vehicle which states that the purpose of use of the vehicle is commercial.

9 Commercial vehicle identification label conditions of approval  Local Law, s19(3) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in an approval for a commercial vehicle identification label are  (a) the holder of an approval for a commercial vehicle identification label must affix the label to the windscreen of the commercial vehicle identified in the label within 3 days after the issue of the label; and (b) if the commercial vehicle has no windscreen, or is a motorcycle, the commercial vehicle identification label must be (i) displayed and kept displayed in a holder clearly visible and similar to that in which is displayed the vehicle registration label issued by the Chief Executive of the Department of Transport; and (ii) affixed to clear glass in the holder in a manner such that all the particulars on the label are clearly visible through the glass; and (c) the holder of the approval for a commercial vehicle identification label must keep the label affixed to the commercial vehicle at all times during the currency of the approval.

10 Term of approval for commercial vehicle identification label  Local Law, s20(2)

regulated (Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, section 102 (Parking regulation involves installing official traffic signs)). An official traffic sign must be installed in a way specified by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, section 72A (Way to install official traffic sign)). Under the Manual, a loading zone may be reserved for commercial vehicles, for example, by the use of the text “LOADING ZONE COMMERCIAL VEH 20 MINS MAX” on an official traffic sign. Under the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009, section 179 (Stopping in a loading zone), a driver must not stop in a loading zone unless the driver is driving an authorised vehicle. For example, if an official traffic sign for a loading zone indicates that the loading zone is reserved for commercial vehicles, a vehicle other than a commercial vehicle is not an authorised vehicle.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 84 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 4

(1) The term for which an approval for a commercial vehicle identification label is granted or renewed will ordinarily be 12 months. (2) However  (a) the local government may fix some other term for an approval if it is desirable to do so  (i) to provide common expiry dates for approvals; or (ii) for some other reason; and (b) an approval expires on the sale of the commercial vehicle by the holder of the approval.

Part 4 Parking permits

11 Persons to whom parking permits may be granted  Local Law, s28 (1) This section specifies (a) the classes of persons to whom parking permits may be granted; and (b) the circumstances in which parking permits may be granted. (2) A parking permit (a multi-residential premises resident parking permit) may— (a) be granted in circumstances where— (i) a person resides in multi-residential premises1 on a section of road and— (A) parking immediately adjacent to the multi-residential premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and (ii) for the vehicle identified in the application for the permit— (A) the current registration certificate for the vehicle identifies the person as the current registered owner of the vehicle; or (B) if the person is not the current registered owner of the vehicle— the person is authorised, by the current registered owner of the vehicle, to use the vehicle on a regular and ongoing basis, and to keep or store the vehicle at the multi-residential premises identified in the application; and (iii) if the permit is granted—there would not be in force— (A) if the multi-residential premises does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, any off-street parking—more than 2 multi-residential premises resident parking permits for the same multi-residential premises; and (B) if the multi-residential premises does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, off-street parking for more than 1 vehicle—more than 1 multi-residential premises resident parking permit for the multi-residential premises; and

1 See definition of multi-residential premises in the dictionary.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 85 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 5

(iv) if the multi-residential premises forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme — the scheme land for the community titles scheme has a kerb side frontage of more than 6m; and (b) not be granted in circumstances where the multi-residential premises identified in the application— (i) has, or can reasonably be provided with, off-street parking for 2 or more vehicles; or (ii) are situated within the boundary of an Event Traffic Area; or (iii) have a water connection approval date on or after 30 October 2018; or (iv) are— (A) in a multi-level building; and (B) directly or indirectly above premises within the multi-level building which are used otherwise than as a residence; or (v) are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business. (3) A parking permit (a detached premises resident parking permit) may— (a) be granted in circumstances where— (i) a person resides in detached premises on a section of road and— (A) parking immediately adjacent to the detached premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and (ii) for the vehicle identified in the application for the permit— (A) the current registration certificate for the vehicle identifies the person as the current registered owner of the vehicle; or (B) if the person is not the current registered owner of the vehicle— the person is authorised, by the current registered owner of the vehicle, to use the vehicle on a regular and ongoing basis, and to keep or store the vehicle at the detached premises identified in the application; and (iii) if the permit is granted—there would not be in force— (A) if the detached premises does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, any off-street parking—more than 3 detached premises resident parking permits for the same detached premises; and (B) if the detached premises does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, off-street parking for more than 1 vehicle— more than 2 detached premises resident parking permits for the detached premises; and (C) if the detached premises does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, off-street parking for more than 2 vehicles— more than 1 detached premises resident parking permit for the detached premises; and (b) not be granted in circumstances where the detached premises identified in the application—

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 86 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 6

(i) has, or can reasonably be provided with, off-street parking for 3 or more vehicles; or (ii) are situated within the boundary of an Event Traffic Area; or (iii) have a kerb side frontage of 6m or less; or (iv) are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business. (4) A parking permit (an eligible organisation parking permit) may be granted to an eligible organisation2 if the local government is satisfied that—

(a) the eligible organisation does not have and cannot reasonably acquire adequate off-street parking; and

(b) the permit will only be used to facilitate the parking on an off-street regulated parking area of—

(i) a vehicle which is—

(A) owned by, or under the control of, the eligible organisation; and (B) primarily used by the eligible organisation for the undertaking of a charitable or not-for-profit activity of the organisation; or (ii) a vehicle which is— (A) owned by, or under the control of, a volunteer of the eligible organisation; and (B) being used by the volunteer whilst the volunteer is actively engaged in a charitable or not-for-profit activity of the organisation. (5) A parking permit (an eligible volunteer parking permit) may be granted to a volunteer of an eligible organisation if the local government is satisfied that— (a) the eligible organisation does not have and cannot reasonably acquire adequate off-street parking; and (b) the permit will only be used to facilitate the parking on an off-street regulated parking area of a vehicle which is — (i) owned by, or under the control of, the volunteer; and (ii) being used by the volunteer whilst the volunteer is actively engaged in a charitable or not-for-profit activity of the organisation. (6) A parking permit (a temporary parking permit) may be granted to allow the holder of the permit to park 1 or more vehicles in a designated parking space or spaces for a period specified in the permit despite an indication on an official traffic sign to the contrary and despite the fact that paid parking would otherwise apply to the space or spaces. (7) A temporary parking permit may only be granted if the local government is satisfied that (a) the applicant is engaged in some temporary activity affecting premises in the vicinity of the designated parking space or spaces to which the application relates; and

2 See definition of eligible organisation in the dictionary.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 87 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 7

(b) it is not reasonably practical for the applicant to carry out that activity unless the designated parking space or spaces to which the application relates are allocated to the applicant’s exclusive use for the duration of the activity. (8) A parking permit (a works zone parking permit) may be granted if the local government is satisfied that (a) the part of the road to which the application relates— (i) is on the same side of the road as the site of proposed building or construction work; and (ii) abuts the kerb of the site of the proposed building or construction work; and (b) the carrying out of the building or construction work is lawful; and (c) having regard to the nature of the building or construction work and the characteristics of the site of the work, it is not reasonably practical for all work activity involving vehicle loading and unloading and associated vehicle movements to be confined within the site. (9) A parking permit (a local government employee parking permit) may be issued to a person whose circumstances are as follows (a) the person is a local government employee; and (b) for the primary purpose of carrying out his or her duties as a local government employee, the person parks his or her vehicle in a designated parking space in a regulated parking area which is designated by the local government for the parking of vehicles by the holder of a local government employee parking permit. (10) A parking permit (a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit) may— (a) be granted in circumstances where— (i) a person (the resident) resides in multi-residential premises on a section of road and— (A) parking immediately adjacent to the multi-residential premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and (ii) the permit is to be made available by the resident for use by another person who— (A) is visiting, or attending at, the multi-residential premises; and (B) intends parking on the section of road immediately adjacent to the multi-residential premises; and (iii) the multi-residential premises do not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, an off-street parking space for use by visitors of the resident; and (iv) if the multi-residential premises forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme—the scheme land for the community titles scheme has a kerb side frontage of more than 6m; and (b) not be granted in circumstances where—

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 88 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 8

(i) if the permit is granted—there would be in force more than 1 multi-residential premises visitor parking permit for the multi-residential premises; or (ii) the multi-residential premises are situated within the boundary of an Event Traffic Area; or (iii) the multi-residential premises have a water connection approval date on or after 30 October 2018; or (iv) the multi-residential premises are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business; or (v) the multi-residential premises are— (A) in a multi-level building; and (B) directly or indirectly above premises within the multi-level building which are used otherwise than as a residence. (11) A parking permit (a detached premises visitor parking permit) may— (a) be granted in circumstances where— (i) a person (the resident) resides in detached premises on a section of road and— (A) parking immediately adjacent to the detached premises is regulated by time; but (B) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and (ii) the permit is to be made available by the resident for use by another person who— (A) is visiting, or attending at, the detached premises; and (B) intends parking on the section of road immediately adjacent to the detached premises; and (iii) the detached premises do not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, an off-street parking space for use by visitors of the resident; and (iv) the detached premises have a kerb side frontage of more than 6m; and (b) not be granted in circumstances where— (i) if the permit is granted—there would be in force more than 3 detached premises visitor parking permits for the detached premises; or (ii) the detached premises are situated within the boundary of an Event Traffic Area; or (iii) the detached premises are used, or intended to be used, as a home based business. (12) A parking permit (a special parking permit) may be granted if the local government is satisfied that — (a) the grant of the permit— (i) is consistent with the objects of the local law; and (ii) will— (A) promote the effective and efficient management of road use in

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 89 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 9

the local government area; or (B) contribute to the strategic management of road infrastructure, and in particular, vehicle parking facilities, on roads in the local government area; or (C) protect the environment and public health, safety and amenity within built-up areas in the local government area from the adverse effects of the parking of vehicles on roads; or (b) the parking permit should be granted to a person because the person’s circumstances are as follows— (i) the person is a carer; and (ii) for the primary purpose of providing the services of a carer—the person parks, or intends parking, his or her vehicle on a section of road in the vicinity of the residence at which the services are to be provided; and (iii) if the parking permit is granted to the person in respect of the parking of a vehicle on a section of road in the vicinity of the residence—there would not be in force more than 1 special parking permit for the residence. (13) A parking permit (a resident’s event parking permit) may be granted in circumstances as follows — (a) a person resides in a residence3 situated on a section of road and— (i) parking immediately adjacent to the residence is regulated by time; but (ii) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and (b) the section of road immediately adjacent to the residence is situated within the boundary of the Robina Stadium Traffic Area or the Stadium Residential Traffic Area; and (c) the grant of the resident’s event parking permit would not unduly impede the flow of traffic either on the road or in the area; and (d) if the resident’s event parking permit is granted — there would not be in force for the same residence (regardless of whether the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme or not), the resident’s event parking permit and any of the following — (i) a multi-residential premises resident parking permit; (ii) a detached premises resident parking permit; (iii) a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit; (iv) a detached premises visitor parking permit; and (e) the number of resident’s event parking permits which may be granted for a residence (other than a residence which forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme) is— (i) if the measured frontage of the residence is less than 6m—nil;

3 See definition of residence in the dictionary.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 90 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 10

(ii) if the measured frontage of the residence is 6m or more, but less than 12m—1; (iii) if the measured frontage of the residence is 12m or more—2; and (f) if the residence forms part or whole of a lot in a community titles scheme — (i) only the body corporate for the community titles scheme may be granted a resident’s event parking permit; and (ii) the maximum number of resident’s event parking permits which may be granted to the body corporate is 2; and (g) if the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme—the total number of residences in the community titles scheme is not more than 20. (14) A parking permit (a main beach event parking permit) may be granted in circumstances as follows— (a) a person resides in a residence situated on a section of road and— (i) parking immediately adjacent to the residence is regulated by time; but (ii) paid parking does not apply to the section of road; and— (b) the section of road immediately adjacent to the residence is situated within the boundary of the Main Beach Traffic Area; and (c) the grant of the main beach event parking permit would not unduly impede the flow of traffic either on the road or in the area; and (d) if the main beach event parking permit is granted — there would not be in force for the same residence (regardless of whether the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme or not), the main beach event parking permit and any of the following— (i) a multi-residential premises resident parking permit; (ii) a detached premises resident parking permit; (iii) a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit; (iv) a detached premises visitor parking permit; and (e) if the main beach event parking permit is granted—there would not be in force— (i) if the residence does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, any off-street parking — more than 2 main beach event parking permits for the same residence; and (ii) if the residence does not have, and cannot reasonably be provided with, off-street parking for more than 1 vehicle — more than 1 main beach event parking permit for the residence; and (f) the number of main beach event parking permits which may be granted for a residence (other than a residence which forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme) is — (i) if the measured frontage of the residence is less than 6m – nil;

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 91 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 11

(ii) if the measured frontage of the residence is 6m or more, but less than 12m— 1; (iii) if the measured frontage of the residence is 12m or more — 2; and (g) if the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme— (i) only the body corporate for the community titles scheme may be granted a main beach event parking permit; and (ii) the maximum number of main beach event parking permits which may be granted to the body corporate is 2; and (h) if the residence forms part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme—the total number of residences in the community titles scheme is not more than 20. (15) A parking permit (a residential care service parking permit) may be granted to a person whose circumstances are as follows— (a) the person is a registered home care provider; and (b) for the primary purpose of carrying out the services of a registered home care provider— (i) the person parks his or her vehicle in a designated parking space and an official traffic sign for the designated parking space indicates that parking is only allowed for a specified maximum time of not less than 2 hours; and (ii) it is necessary for the person to park his or her vehicle in the designated parking space for longer than the specified maximum time indicated on the official traffic sign. (16) For the purposes of section 28 of the local law, a parking permit under subsections (2) to (15) inclusive— (a) may be granted to a person authorising the parking of a vehicle which is a motor vehicle; but (b) must not be granted to a person authorising the parking of any of the following— (i) a caravan; (ii) a long vehicle; (iii) a motorbike; (iv) a trailer; (v) a golf buggy; and (c) must not be granted to a person authorising the parking of a heavy vehicle unless the permit is a works zone parking permit.

12 Other information to accompany a parking permit applicationLocal Law, s29(f) (1) The other details or information which must accompany an application is— (a) if the application is for a multi-residential premises resident parking permit

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 92 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 12

or a detached premises resident parking permit— the details or information specified in subsection (2); and (b) if the application is for an eligible organisation parking permit — the details or information specified in subsection (2A); and (c) if the application is for an eligible volunteer parking permit— the details or information specified in subsection (3); and (d) if the application is for a works zone parking permit— the details or information specified in subsections (4) to (6) inclusive; and (e) if the application is for a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit or a detached premises visitor parking permit—the details or information specified in subsection (7); and (f) if the application is for a special parking permit—the details or information specified in subsection (7A); and (g) if the application is for a resident’s event parking permit or a main beach event parking permit—the details or information specified in subsection (8); and (h) if the application is for a residential care service parking permit—the details or information specified in subsection (9). (2) The other details or information which must accompany an application for a multi- residential premises resident parking permit or a detached premises resident parking permit is— (a) a copy of the current registration certificate for each vehicle identified in the application; and (b) written evidence that the applicant resides at the residence identified in the application, for example, a copy of the current driver licence of the applicant; and (c) written particulars of all off-street parking facilities on the land on which the residence is situated which are, or can reasonably be made, available for use by the applicant; and (d) if the application is for a multi-residential premises parking permit—written particulars of the kerb side frontage of the scheme land for the multi-residential premises identified in the application; and (e) if the application is for a detached premises resident parking permit— written particulars of the kerb side frontage of the detached premises identified in the application. (2A) The other details or information which must accompany an application for an eligible organisation parking permit is written evidence from the eligible organisation — (a) that the eligible organisation does not have and cannot reasonably acquire adequate off-street parking; and (b) about how the permit will only be used to facilitate the parking on an off- street regulated parking area of a vehicle which is primarily used by the eligible organisation or a volunteer of the eligible organisation engaged in a charitable or not-for-profit activity of the organisation.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 93 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 13

(3) An application of a volunteer for an eligible volunteer parking permit must be accompanied by written evidence from the eligible organisation identified in the application that the eligible organisation— (a) does not have and cannot reasonably acquire adequate off-street parking; and (b) has authorised the volunteer to engage in an activity which is consistent with the objects of the eligible organisation. (4) A person who applies for a works zone parking permit must also apply to the local government for declaration of a specified part of the road adjacent to the site of the proposed building or construction work as a works zone. (5) The applicant for the works zone parking permit must be the person undertaking the building or construction works. (6) The application must be made at least 3 weeks prior to the date of commencement of the building or construction work to which the application relates. (7) The other details or information which must accompany an application for a multi- residential premises visitor parking permit or a detached premises visitor parking permit is— (a) written evidence that the applicant resides at the residence identified in the application, for example, a copy of the current driver licence of the applicant; and (b) written particulars of all off-street parking facilities on the land on which the residence is situated, which are, or can reasonably be made, available for use by a person who is visiting, or attending at, the residence. (7A) The other details or information which must accompany an application for a special parking permit is— (a) written evidence— (i) identifying the full name, current residential address and telephone number of the applicant; and (ii) identifying the full name, current residential address and telephone number of the other person for whose benefit the applicant will provide ongoing care or assistance in the applicant’s capacity as a carer; and (b) if the applicant is recognised by, or a member of, a carers association — written evidence from the carers association that the applicant is recognised by, or a member of, the carers association; and (c) if the applicant is not recognised by, or a member of, a carers association — written evidence — (i) from the applicant, by way of statutory declaration, that the applicant provides, in a non-contractual and unpaid capacity, ongoing care and assistance to another person (the second person) who, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks; and (ii) from a medical practitioner, by way of statutory declaration, that the second person, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 94 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 14

(8) The other details or information which must accompany an application for a resident’s event parking permit or a main beach event parking permit is— (a) written evidence that the applicant resides at the residence identified in the application, for example, a copy of the current driver licence of the applicant; and (b) written particulars of the measured frontage of the residence; and (c) written particulars of all off-street parking facilities on the land on which the residence is situated which are, or can reasonably be, made available for use by— (i) the applicant; or (ii) a person who is visiting, or attending at, the residence; and (d) other details or information as is necessary to satisfy the local government that the circumstances of the applicant— (i) if the application is for a resident’s event parking permit—satisfy the criteria specified in section 11(13); and (iii) if the application is for a main beach event parking permit—satisfy the criteria specified in section 11(14). (9) The other details or information which must accompany an application for a residential care service parking permit is written evidence that the registered home care provider is employed by, or contracted to, an approved home care service provider, for example, a letter from the approved home care service provider identifying the registered home care provider as an employee or contractor of the approved home care service provider.

13 Term of parking permit  Local Law, s30(4) (1) The term for which a parking permit is granted or renewed must be determined by the local government having regard to the information submitted by the applicant for the parking permit. (2) The local government may fix a term for 1 or more parking permits if it is desirable to do so— (a) to provide common expiry dates for parking permits; or (b) for some other reason.

14 Conditions of parking permit  Local Law, s31(3) (1) This section specifies the conditions that will ordinarily be imposed on a parking permit. (2) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed on all parking permits are (a) if the permit authorises the parking of a vehicle on a road or off-street regulated parking area—the holder of the permit must affix the permit, facing outwards, on— (i) the windscreen on the passenger side of the vehicle; or (ii) a window on the passenger side of the vehicle; and

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 95 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 15

(b) a replacement permit will only be issued after completion by the permit holder of a statutory declaration detailing the facts and circumstances of the loss, destruction or damage of the original permit; and (c) if a permit is a permit other than a works zone parking permit — the permit must not be used in respect of the parking of a vehicle in a designated parking space if an official traffic sign indicates that paid parking applies to the designated parking space. (3) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a multi-residential premises resident parking permit and a detached premises resident parking permit are— (a) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle identified in the permit at the location identified in the permit which must be— (i) the road adjacent to the residence identified in the permit; or (ii) the 1 or more segments of road in close proximity to the residence identified in the permit; and (b) the holder of the permit must only use the permit whilst the holder resides at the residence identified in the permit. (4) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in an eligible organisation parking permit are— (a) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle at an off-street regulated parking area identified in the permit; and (b) the permit must only be used by the holder of the permit if the holder is actively engaged in an activity which is consistent with the objects of the eligible organisation; and (c) the permit may be used by a volunteer of the eligible organisation but only if the volunteer is actively engaged in an activity which is consistent with the objects of the eligible organisation. (5) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in an eligible volunteer parking permit are— (a) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle at an off-street regulated parking area identified in the permit; and (b) the permit must only be used by the volunteer if the volunteer is actively engaged in an activity which is consistent with the objects of the eligible organisation identified in the permit. (5A) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a temporary parking permit are— (a) it is the responsibility of the holder of the permit to ensure that all vehicles using the area of road to which the permit relates comply with all applicable provisions of each of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009 and the local laws of the local government; and (b) no construction materials or equipment of any kind may be stacked, placed, stored or otherwise left on the area of road to which the permit relates, including any road or footpath either within or outside of the area of road to which the permit relates, at any time, except where necessary to comply with a work, health and safety or operational requirement in which event the

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 96 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 16

holder of the permit must also apply for, and obtain, from the local government, a permit to interfere with a road under Local Law No. 11 (Roads and Malls) 2008; and (c) unless approved in writing by the local government, the holder of the permit must not permit or allow the activity authorised by the permit to be undertaken in a manner which obstructs pedestrian movement along a footpath within or adjacent to the area of road to which the permit relates, for example, the parking of a vehicle, the loading or unloading of construction materials or equipment, or other building or construction related works or operations; and (d) the holder of the permit is solely responsible for— (i) securing the use of the area of road to which the permit relates for the activity authorised by the permit; and (ii) setting aside the area of road to which the permit relates for use by the holder of the permit by the placement of acceptable delineation devices, for example, traffic cones; and (iii) ensuring that the manner in which the holder of the permit sets aside the area of road to which the permit relates complies with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 3 – Works on Roads and AS1742 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (including AS1742.3-2009 Traffic control devices for works on roads); and (e) the holder of the permit must contact the local government before undertaking the activity authorised by the permit to advise of the undertaking of the activity at the area of road to which the permit relates; and (f) the holder of the permit must pay to the local government, on demand, a use fee in respect of the use of the area of road to which the permit relates for the activity authorised by the permit; and (g) the holder of the permit must clearly display a copy of the permit whilst a vehicle of the holder is parked within the area of road to which the permit relates. (6) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a works zone parking permit are— (a) it is the responsibility of the holder of the permit to ensure that all vehicles using the works zone identified in the permit comply with all applicable provisions of each of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009 and the local laws of the local government; and (b) no construction materials or equipment of any kind may be stacked, placed, stored or otherwise left on the works zone, including any road or footpath either within or outside of the works zone, at any time, except where necessary to comply with a work, health and safety or operational requirement, in which event the holder of the permit must also apply for, and obtain, from the local government, a permit to interfere with a road under Local Law No. 11 (Roads and Malls) 2008; and (c) the holder of the permit must not permit or allow the activity authorised by

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 97 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 17

the permit to be undertaken in a manner which obstructs pedestrian movement along a footpath within or adjacent to the works zone, for example, the parking of a vehicle, the loading or unloading of construction materials or equipment, or other building or construction related works or operations; and (d) the holder of the permit must not permit or allow a vehicle to be parked within the works zone except while it is being loaded or unloaded in connection with the activity authorised by the permit; and (e) the holder of the permit is solely responsible for— (i) securing the use of the area of road to which the permit relates for the activity authorised by the permit; and (ii) setting aside the area of road to which the permit relates for use by the holder of the permit by the placement of acceptable delineation devices, for example, traffic cones; and (iii) ensuring that the manner in which the holder of the permit sets aside the area of road to which the permit relates complies with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 3 – Works on Roads and AS1742 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (including AS1742.3-2009 Traffic control devices for works on roads); and (f) the holder of the permit must contact the local government before undertaking the activity authorised by the permit to advise of the undertaking of the activity at the works zone; and (g) the holder of the permit must pay to the local government, on demand— (i) the fee prescribed by the local government, as determined by the local government, for the installation of official traffic signs, and other signs and markings, as determined by the local government to be appropriate, to identify the boundaries of the works zone; and (ii) a use fee, for the use of the works zone, for the purpose of undertaking the activity authorised by the permit; and (h) the local government may change a condition of the permit, for example, a change to the hours of operation of the activity authorised by the permit or the location or size of the works zone; and (i) the holder of the permit must, not later than 7 days prior to the expiry date of the permit— (i) apply to the local government for renewal of the permit; or (ii) give written notice to the local government of the expiry of the permit on the expiry date. (7) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a local government employee parking permit are (a) the permit must specify 1 or more off-street regulated parking areas to which the permit relates; and (b) the permit will ordinarily specify that the holder of the permit may only park the vehicle identified in the permit on an off-street regulated parking area identified in the permit

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 98 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 18

(i) for the primary purpose of carrying out his or her duties as a local government employee; and (ii) during specified days and times; and (iii) for the duration of one or more specified events. (8) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a multi-residential premises visitor parking permit and a detached premises visitor parking permit are— (a) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle at the location identified in the permit which must be— (i) the road adjacent to the residence identified in the permit; or (ii) the 1 or more segments of road in close proximity to the residence identified in the permit; and (b) the permit must only be used by a person visiting, or attending at, the residence identified in the permit; and (c) the permit is not specific to any particular vehicle. (9) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a special parking permit are (a) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle on a road or at an off-street regulated parking area identified in the permit; and (b) the permit is not specific to any particular vehicle; and (c) if the permit specifies that the permit may only be used in specified circumstancesthe permit may only be used in the specified circumstances; and (d) if the permit is granted under section 11(12)(b)— (i) the permit must only be used by the holder of the permit if the holder is actively engaged in providing the services of a carer— (A) for another person identified in the application for the permit; and (B) at the address of the residence of the other person identified in the application for the permit; and (ii) the permit is not specific to any particular vehicle; and (iii) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle at the location identified in the permit, which must be in the vicinity of the residence identified in the permit. (10) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a resident’s event parking permit are— (a) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle at the location identified in the permit, which must be the road immediately adjacent to the residence identified in the permit; and (b) the holder of the permit must only use the permit whilst the holder resides at the residence identified in the permit; and (c) a resident’s event parking permit is not specific to any particular vehicle. (11) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a main beach event parking permit are—

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 99 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 19

(a) the permit must be used only in respect of the parking of a vehicle at the location identified in the permit, which must be the road immediately adjacent to the residence identified in the permit; and (b) the holder of the permit must only use the permit whilst the holder resides at the residence identified in the permit; and (c) a main beach event parking permit is not specific to any particular vehicle. (12) The conditions that will ordinarily be imposed in a residential care service parking permit are— (a) the permit must only be used by the holder of the permit if— (i) the holder is actively engaged in the carrying out of the services of a registered home care provider; and (ii) the holder parks his or her vehicle in a designated parking space and an official traffic sign for the designated parking space indicates that parking is only allowed for a specified maximum time of not less than 2 hours; and (iii) it is necessary for the holder to park his or her vehicle in the designated parking space for longer than the specified maximum time indicated on the official traffic sign; and (b) the permit is specific to the vehicle identified in the permit; and (c) the permit must not be used in respect of the parking of a vehicle in a designated parking space if an official traffic sign indicates that paid parking applies to the designated parking space.

Part 5 Minor traffic offence infringement notice penalties

15 Infringement notice penalty amounts—Local Law, s36(1) For section 36 of the local law, the infringement notice penalty amount4 for an offence mentioned in column 1 of schedule 3 is the corresponding amount stated in column 2 of schedule 3.

4 Under section 108 of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995 (a) a local government may, under a local law, prescribe an amount as an infringement notice penalty for a minor traffic offence; and (b) for the State Penalties Enforcement Act 1999, the minor traffic offence is an infringement notice offence and the penalty is the infringement notice penalty for the offence. See sections 5 (Meaning of penalty unit) and 5A (Prescribed value of particular penalty unit) of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 and section 2B of the Penalties and Sentences Regulation 2005.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 100 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 20

Schedule 1 Dictionary Section 3

approved home care service provider means a person who is an approved provider under the Aged Care Act 1997 for a home care service. boat means any kind of boat or other vessel used or intended to be used, in navigation by water or for any other purpose on water and includes a boat or other vessel  (a) whatever its size; and (b) however it is propelled or moved. body corporate has the meaning given in the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997. building has the meaning given in the Building Act 1975. built-up area has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009. Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area see section 5(a). caravan has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Vehicle Registration) Regulation 2010, schedule 8. carer— (a) means a person (the first person) who provides, in a non-contractual and unpaid capacity, ongoing care or assistance to another person (the second person) who, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks; but (b) the first person may only be a carer if— (i) the ongoing care or assistance provided by the first person to the second person is recognised, in writing, by a carers association; or (ii) the first person delivers to the local government written evidence, from a medical practitioner, by way of statutory declaration, that the second person, because of disability, frailty, chronic illness or pain, requires assistance with everyday tasks; and (c) despite paragraphs (a) and (b)—if the first person and the second person reside in the same residence, the first person is not a carer for the second person for the purposes of the local law. carers association means— (a) Carers Queensland Limited ABN 20 061 257 725; and (b) another corporation or incorporated association which— (i) has objects similar to the objects of the corporation referred to in paragraph (a); and (ii) is recognised for the purposes of the local law by the local government. Central Traffic Area see section 5(b). community titles scheme has the meaning given in the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 101 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 21

detached premises —

(a) means— (i) a residence which is not attached to, or touching, another residence or another building; and (ii) a residence which forms part of a group of 2 residences in circumstances where 1 residence of the group is attached to, or touching, the other residence of the group; but (b) does not include a residence situated on a lot which forms part of a community titles scheme. detached premises resident parking permit see section 11(3). detached premises visitor parking permit see section 11(11). eligible organisation— (a) means an entity that is registered as having a charitable purpose on the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Register published by the Australian Government; but (b) if the Australian Government ceases to publish the Register — means an entity that is endorsed by the Australian Taxation Office as a deductible gift recipient; and (c) includes a government agency or government entity but only if— (i) the agency or entity is undertaking a charitable or not-for-profit activity; and (ii) the activity is undertaken ancillary to the primary function or responsibility of the agency or entity; and (iii) the activity is undertaken by 1 or more volunteers. eligible organisation parking permit see section 11(4). eligible volunteer parking permit see section 11(5). Event Traffic Area includes each of the following— (a) the Main Beach Traffic Area; and (b) the Robina Stadium Traffic Area; and (c) the Stadium Residential Traffic Area. Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area see section 5(c). government agency has the meaning given in the Local Government Regulation 2012. government entity has the meaning given in the Local Government Act 2009. heavy vehicle has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. high rise building, for multi-residential premises, means a building which has (a) a height exceeding 32m above ground level immediately adjacent to the building; or (b) more than 8 storeys. home based business has the meaning given in the planning scheme of the local government.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 102 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 22

kerb side frontage— (a) of detached premises, means the length, measured in metres, along the alignment of the detached premises abutting a road, but excluding each of the following— (i) the width of the driveway of the detached premises abutting the road; and (ii) any part of the road on which the driver of a vehicle must not stop because, for example— (A) the side of the road is marked with a continuous yellow edge line; or (B) a no stopping sign applies to the part of the road; or (C) under the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009, a driver must not stop at the place, or on the part of the road; (b) of scheme land for a community titles scheme, means the length, measured in metres, along the alignment of the scheme land abutting a road, but excluding each of the following— (i) the width of any driveway of the scheme land; and (ii) any part of the road on which the driver of a vehicle must not stop because, for example— (A) the side of the road is marked with a continuous yellow edge line; or (B) a no stopping sign applies to the part of the road; or (C) under the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009, a driver must not stop at the place, or on the part of the road. land has the meaning given in the Planning Act 2016. local government employee has the meaning given in the Local Government Act 2009. local government employee parking permit see section 11(9). long vehicle has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009, section 200. lot has the meaning given in the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997. low rise building, means a building which has— (a) a height which does not exceed 9m above ground level immediately adjacent to the building; or (b) up to 2 storeys, with option for a partial third storey, provided the height of the building does not exceed 9m above ground level immediately adjacent to the building. main beach event parking permit see section 11(14). Main Beach Traffic Area see section 5(d). measured frontage, of a residence, means— (a) the length, measured in metres, along the alignment of the residence abutting a road; but (b) does not include the width of the driveway of the residence abutting the road.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 103 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 23

medical practitioner means a person — (a) in Queensland, under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (Queensland) in the medical profession; or

(b) in New South Wales, under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) in the medical profession. medium rise building, for multi-residential premises, means a building which has (a) a height which exceeds 9m, but does not exceed 32m above ground level immediately adjacent to the building; or (b) 3 or more, but not more than 8 storeys. motorbike has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. motor vehicle has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. multi-level building — (a) means a building in which 1 or more residences in the building — (i) share a ceiling or floor with at least 1 other residence in the building; and (ii) are at least partially directly above or below at least 1 other residence in the building; and (b) a building may be a multi-level building regardless of whether the building forms part, or the whole, of a community titles scheme. multi-residential premises — (a) means a residence which forms part of a group of 3 or more residences in circumstances where each residence of the group is attached to, or touching, at least 1 other residence of the group; and (b) includes a residence situated on a lot which forms part of a community titles scheme; but (c) does not include a residence in a multi-level building (including a high rise building, a medium rise building and a low rise building) or a community titles scheme (regardless of whether the community titles scheme is a multi-level building or not) if the total number of residences in the multi-level building or community titles scheme is — (i) if the multi-level building or community titles scheme is in the Central Traffic Area or the Southport Traffic Area— more than 30; (ii) if the multi-level building or community titles scheme is in a traffic area other than the Central Traffic Area or the Southport Traffic Area — more than 20. multi-residential premises resident parking permit see section 11(2). multi-residential premises visitor parking permit see section 11(10). off-street parking, for premises, including multi-residential premises and detached premises, includes— (a) any space within, or partly within, a building, including a residence, which is set aside

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 104 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 24

for, used, or intended to be used, for the parking of 1 or more vehicles, for example, a garage or carport, usually on the ground level of, or adjacent to, the building; and (b) any space within, or partly within, a building, including a residence, to the extent that an approval has been granted in respect of the use of the space for the parking of 1 or more vehicles, but the space is used for a purpose other than the parking of 1 or more vehicles, for example, a garage which forms part of a residence, but the garage has been converted so that the garage may be used for a residential or non-parking purpose. parking immediately adjacent, to premises, including multi-residential premises and detached premises, means parking on a road, but only— (a) on the same side of the road as the premises; and (b) where the kerb of the road abuts— (i) if the premises are multi-residential premises — the scheme land of the community titles scheme for the multi-residential premises; (ii) if the premises are detached premises — the detached premises. registered home care provider means a person who is an employee or contractor of an approved home care service provider. registration certificate has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Vehicle Registration) Regulation 2010. residence means a building, or part of a building, that is — (a) a self-contained unit; and (b) used by, or intended for the exclusive residential use of, a single family unit; and (c) fixed to land. resident see section 11(10) and (11). residential care service parking permit see section 11(15). resident’s event parking permit see section 11(13). Robina Stadium Traffic Area see section 5(e). scheme land has the meaning given in the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997. Southern Traffic Area see section 5(f). Southport Traffic Area see section 5(g). special parking permit see section 11(12). Stadium Residential Traffic Area see section 5(h). storey (a) for a building, means a space that is situated between 1 floor level and the floor level next above, or if there is no floor above, the ceiling or roof above, but not a space that contains only (i) a lift shaft, stairway or meter room; (ii) a bathroom, shower room, laundry, water closet, or other sanitary compartment; (iii) a combination of the above; but

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 105 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 25

(b) a mezzanine is a storey; and (c) a roofed structure on or part of a rooftop that does not solely accommodate building plant and equipment is a storey; and (d) a basement is not a storey. temporary parking permit see section 11(6). trailer has the meaning given in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, schedule 4. Varsity Lakes Traffic Area see section 5(i). volunteer means a person who freely offers to do something, or work for, an eligible organisation without being paid. water connection approval date means— (a) for compliance assessable work at multi-residential premises that is, under the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2002, the testing and commissioning of a cold water service, a heated water service and a sanitary plumbing or drainage installation—the date on which the responsible person for the compliance assessable work gives the local government a compliance report for the multi-residential premises which states that the plumbing and drainage for the multi-residential premises— (i) complies with the applied provision; and (ii) otherwise complies with the requirements of section 22 of the Standard Plumbing and Drainage Regulation 2003; (b) if paragraph (a) does not apply because of the commencement of the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2018—1 July 2019. works zone parking permit see section 11(8).

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 106 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 26

Schedule 1A Bundall/Chevron Island Traffic Area Section 5

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 107 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 27

Schedule 1B Central Traffic Area Section 5

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 108 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 28

Schedule 1C Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area Section 5

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 109 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 29

Schedule 1D Main Beach Traffic Area Section 5

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 110 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 30

Schedule 1E Robina Stadium Traffic Area Section 5

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 111 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 31

Schedule 1F Southern Traffic Area Section 5

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 112 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 32

Schedule 1G Southport Traffic Area Section 5

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 113 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 33

Schedule 1H Stadium Residential Traffic Area Section 5

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 114 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 34

Schedule 1I Varsity Lakes Traffic Area Section 5

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 115 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 35

Schedule 2 Off-street regulated parking areas Section 6 Part 1  Off-street regulated parking areasgeneral

AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 1. Lot 1 on Registered Plan 156450, County Mal Burke Carpark, 13 Hinze Street, of Ward, Parish of Nerang Southport 2. Lot 10 on Survey Plan 131659, County of Athol Paterson Carpark, 25 Lawson Ward, Parish of Nerang Street, Southport 3. An area of 1068m2 being part of the land Cloyne Road Carpark, 11 Cloyne described as Lot 3 on Registered Plan Road, Southport 841228, County of Ward, Parish of Nerang 4. Part of Reserve 943, Lot 579 on Plan WD Carey Park Carpark, Gold Coast 6339, County of Ward, Parish of Nerang. Highway, Southport. 5. Lot 204 on Survey Plan 139049, County Bruce Bishop Carpark (Transit of Ward, Parish of Gilston. Centre), 10 Beach Road, Surfers Paradise. 6. An area of 1,233m2 being part of the Beachcomber Carpark, Trickett Street, common property on level C of Building Surfers Paradise Units Plan No. 4779, County of Ward, Parish of Gilston. 7. Part of Lot 9 and Lot 10 on Survey Plan Broadwater Parklands Carpark, 254918 and part of Lot 11, Lot 12 and Lot Marine Parade, Southport. 14 on Survey Plan 170654, County of Ward, Parish of Nerang 8. An area of approximately 2700m2 being Old Pacific Highway Carpark, Pacific part of the Pacific Highway with an entry Highway, Oxenford from Siganto Drive commencing opposite the northern boundary of Lot 1 on Registered Plan 69494, County of Ward, Parish of Barrow and extending southwards for 110m 9. Lot 101 on Registered Plan 203356, Gold Coast City Council County of Ward, Parish of Nerang Administration Centre Carpark and Bicentennial Centre Parking Area, Southport, Nerang Road, Nerang 10. Lot 41 on Registered Plan 841221, Chirn Park Carpark, 3 Turpin Road, County of Ward, Parish of Nerang Labrador 11. Lot 1 on Survey Plan 104014, County of Seaworld Drive Carpark, Seaworld Ward, Parish of Gilston Drive, Main Beach

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 116 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 36

AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 12. Lot 11 on Survey Plan 131659, County of Southport Library Carpark, 15 Lawson Ward, Parish of Nerang Street, Southport. 13. Part of Lot 4 on Survey Plan 148594, The Centre Parking Area and the County of Ward, Parish of Nerang Administration Centre Parking Areas, Bundall Road, Crombie Avenue and Ouyan Street, Surfers Paradise. 14. Lot 4 on Registered Plan 841214, County Holden Place Carpark, 152 Bundall of Ward, Parish of Nerang Road, Bundall 15. Lot 2 on Registered Plan 217892, County Frigo Court Carpark, 6 Frigo Court, of Ward, Parish of Nerang Bundall 16. Lot 18 on Registered Plan 201092, Main Place Carpark, 2725 Gold Coast County of Ward, Parish of Gilston Highway, Broadbeach 17. Lot 23 on Registered Plan 42932, County Toombul Avenue Carpark, 4 Toombul of Ward, Parish of Gilston Avenue, Miami 18. Lot 9 on Registered Plan B16747, Lot 3 Alex Black Carpark, Connor Street, on Plan B16753 and Lot 6 on Burleigh Heads Plan B16732, County of Ward, Parish of Mudgeeraba 19. Lot 9 on Registered Plan 837312, County Gordon and Jean Duncan Carpark, 7 of Ward, Parish of Mudgeeraba Park Avenue, Burleigh Heads 20. Lot 4 on Registered Plan 66924, County West Burleigh Carpark, 59 West of Ward, Parish of Nerang Burleigh Road, West Burleigh 21. Lot 53 on Registered Plan 811098, Fifth Avenue and Cypress Terrace County of Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera Carpark, 62 Cypress Terrace, Palm Beach 22. Lot 25 on Registered Plan 837309 and Joe Davidson Carpark, 12 Eighth Lots 100 to 104 and 107 on Registered Avenue, Palm Beach Plan 32000, County of Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera 23. Lot 3 on Registered Plan 811100, County Seventh Avenue and Jefferson Lane of Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera Carpark, 112 Jefferson Lane, Palm Beach 24. Lot 14 on Registered Plan 841192 and O’Connor Street Carpark, 11 Reserve 1809 (Lot 316 on Plan WD5514), O’Connor Street, Tugun County of Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera 25. Lots 3 and 4 on Registered Plan 2001, Bielby Street (South) Carpark, 2 County of Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera Bielby Street, Tugun 26. Lot 7 on Registered Plan 2001 and Lot 9 Bielby Street (North) Carpark, 3 on Registered Plan 1999, County of Ward, Bielby Street, Tugun Parish of Tallebudgera

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 117 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 37

AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 27. Lot 46 on Registered Plan 100298, Lot Coolangatta Carpark, Chalk Street and 141 on Plan C2856, Lot 224 on Plan Lanham Street, Coolangatta WD3831 and Lot 358 on Plan CP864305, County of Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera and the road reserve between Chalk street and Lanham Street, Coolangatta as shown on Council Plan No. 53141 28. Lot 441 on Registered Plan 93882, Karloo Street, Chevron Island County of Ward, Parish of Nerang 29. Lot 2 on Registered Plan 177019, County Frigo Court Carpark East, Frigo Court, of Ward, Parish of Nerang Bundall 30. Lot 807 on Plan N1161, County of Ward, 44 Price Street, Nerang Parish of Nerang 31. Lot 3 on Survey Plan 149191, County of 57 Railway Street, Mudgeeraba Ward, Parish of Gilston 32. Lot 3 on CP884105, County of Ward, Woodroffe Park, 10 Lawson Street, Parish of Nerang Southport 33. Lot 387 on Plan WD5223, County of Karp Court Reserve, Karp Court, Ward, Parish of Nerang Bundall 34. Lot 388 on Plan WD5223, County of Frigo Court Reserve, Karp Court, Ward, Parish of Nerang Bundall 35. Lot 26 on SP222679, County of Ward, Owen Park, 201 Queen Street, Parish of Nerang Southport 36. Lot 71 on SP202854, County of Ward, 1 Paddington Place, Robina Parish of Gilston 37. Lot 4 on SP191949, County of Ward, Upper Coomera Centre Car Park, 90 Parish of Coomera Reserve Road, Coomera 38. Lot 121 on SP244690, County of Ward, Justin Park, The Esplanade, Burleigh Parish of Mudgeeraba and Lot 207 on Heads SP153595, County of Ward, Parish of Gilston 39. Lot 364 on CP866587, County of Ward, Sir Bruce Small Park, St Kevin’s Parish of Nerang Avenue, Benowa 40. Lot 335 on SP 220576, County of Ward, 9 Holden Place, Bundall Parish of Nerang (known as Waterside East and Waterside West, but excluding, from each of Waterside East and Waterside West, the 2 levels of car parking situated below ground level)

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 118 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 38

AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 41. Part of Reserve 49009788, Lot 1 on Pratten Park Carpark, Old Burleigh Survey Plan 134184, County of Ward, Road, Broadbeach Parish of Gilston 42. Part of Reserve 1269, Lot 4 on Survey Runaway Bay Library and Plan 116505, County of Ward, Parish of Community Centre Carpark, Bayview Barrow Street, Runaway Bay 43. Lot 1 on Survey Plan 161666, County of Robina Library and Community Ward, Parish of Gilston Centre Carpark, 196 Robina Town Centre Drive, Robina 44. Lot 212 on Survey Plan 191017, County Broadbeach Library Carpark, 61 of Ward, Parish of Gilston Sunshine Boulevard, Mermaid Waters 45. Lot 98 on Registered Plan 837307, Palm Beach Branch Office Carpark, County of Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera 22 Eleventh Avenue, Palm Beach 46. Lot 1 on Survey Plan 240019, County of Cypress Avenue Carpark, 3332 Ward, Parish of Gilston Surfers Paradise Boulevard, Surfers Paradise 47. Lot 393 on Survey Plan 249618 Cascade Gardens Parklands, 2730 Gold Coast Highway, Broadbeach 48. Lot 40 on Survey Plan 156266 TE Peters Parklands, 23 TE Peters Drive, Broadbeach Waters 49. Lot 144 on Survey Plan 249619 Neddy Harper and William Duncan Park, 2840 Gold Coast Highway, Surfers Paradise 50. Lot 309 on WD3867 McIntosh Island Park, Gold Coast Highway, Surfers Paradise 51. Lot 601 on Survey Plan 254915 Matron and Sister Higman Park, 1 Queen Street, Southport 52. Part of Reserve 1246, Lot 165 on Survey Palm Beach Parklands Carpark, 945 Plan 229244, County of Ward, Parish of Gold Coast Highway, Palm Beach Tallebudgera 53. Lot 205 on Survey Plan 100670 Tugun Esplanade Carparks, Pacific Parade, Bilinga 54. Lot 201 on SP138246, County of Ward, Apex Park, Marine Parade, Parish of Tallebudgera Coolangatta 55. Lot 219 on Plan WD3797, County of Rainbow Bay Surf Life Saving Club Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera (bays in front of the surf club), Marine Parade, Coolangatta 56. Lot 231 on Plan WD4532, County of Coolangatta Senior Citizens, Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera 2 Gerrard Street, Coolangatta

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 119 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 39

AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 57. Lot 208 on Plan WD4192, County of Coolangatta Bowls Club, Gerrard Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera Street, Coolangatta 58. Lot 153 on Plan WD1807, County of Goodwin Park, Lanham Street, Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera Coolangatta 59. Lot 100 on Registered Plan 841208, Mermaid Beach Community Centre, County of Ward, Parish of Gilston 2439 Gold Coast Highway, Mermaid Beach 60. Lot 3 on Survey Plan 269411, County of Nikiforides Park, Surf Parade, Ward, Parish of Gilston Broadbeach 61. Lot 275 on Registered Plan 21858, Annette Kellerman Park, 2418 Gold County of Ward, Parish of Gilston Coast Highway, Mermaid Beach 62. Lot 263 on Plan WD3116, County of Moana Park, 14 - 20 Kalimna Drive, Ward, Parish of Gilston Broadbeach Waters 63. Lot 111 on Registered Plan 841233, Paradise Point Community Centre, County of Ward, Parish of Barrow 31 Falkinder Avenue, Paradise Point 64. Lot 727 on Registered Plan 144986 Crocker Park Carpark, 92 Markeri Street, Mermaid Waters 65. Lot 30 on Registered Plan 841205 Ken Mansbridge Park Carpark, 177 Hedges Avenue, Mermaid Beach 66. Lot 238 on Plan WD4321 Palm Beach Aquatic Centre Carpark, Thrower Drive, Palm Beach 67. Lot 995 on Survey Plan 190851 Harbour Town North Park, East Quay Drive, Biggera Waters

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 120 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 40

Part 2  Off-street regulated parking areas  designated parking spaces where a people with disabilities parking sign applies

AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 1. Lot 1 on Survey Plan 19721, County of Helensvale Plaza, 12 Sir John Overall Ward, Parish of Barrow Drive, Helensvale 2. Lot 10 on Registered Plan 887373, Runaway Bay Shopping Centre, 151 County of Ward, Parish of Barrow Morala Avenue, Runaway Bay 3. Lot 2 on Registered Plan 173266, County Labrador Park Shopping Centre, 100 of Ward, Parish of Barrow Brisbane Road, Labrador 4. Lot 714 on Survey Plan 122990, County Harbour Town Shopping Centre, 147 of Ward, Parish of Barrow – 189 Brisbane Road, Biggera Waters 5. Lot 193 on CP860763, County of Ward, Ashmore City Shopping Centre, 206 Parish of Nerang Currumburra Road, Ashmore 6. Lot 2 on Registered Plan 180082, County Ashmore Plaza Shopping Centre, 146 of Ward, Parish of Nerang Cotlew Street, Ashmore 7. Lot 1 on Registered Plan 804689 and Australia Fair Shopping Centre, 40 Lot 1 on Registered Plan 180080, County Marine Parade, Southport, 58 of Ward, Parish of Nerang Scarborough Street, Southport 8. Lot 822 on Registered Plan 839746, Benowa Gardens Shopping Centre, County of Ward, Parish of Nerang 203 Ashmore Road, Benowa 9. Lot 19 on Registered Plan 206210, Gold Coast Institute of TAFE, 21 County of Ward, Parish of Nerang Nerang Street, Southport 10. Lot 1 on Registered Plan 116653, County Gold Coast Mail Centre, 26 Crombie of Ward, Parish of Nerang Avenue, Bundall 11. Lot 9 on Registered Plan 193104, County Southport Park Shopping Centre, 163 of Ward, Parish of Nerang Ferry Road, Southport 12. Lot 531 on Plan WD5980, Lot 532 on Marina Mirage, 72 Seaworld Drive, Plan WD6315, County of Ward, Parish of Main Beach Gilston 13. Lot 2 on Survey Plan 179669, County of Upper Coomera Shopping Centre, 72 Ward, Parish of Coomera Reserve Road, Upper Coomera 14. Lot 26 on Survey Plan 220933, County of Mudgeeraba Market Shopping Centre, Ward, Parish of Gilston 3 Swan Lane, Mudgeeraba 15. Lot 25 on Survey Plan 161273, County of The Oasis Shopping Centre, 75 Surf Ward, Parish of Gilston Parade, Broadbeach 16. Lot 13 on Registered Plan 866294, Pacific Fair Shopping Centre, 2 – 30 County of Ward, Parish of Gilston Hooker Boulevard, Broadbeach 17. Lot 320 and Lot 321 on Registered Plan Q Super Centre, 14 Allandale 850765 and Lot 327 on Registered Plan Entrance and Bermuda Street,

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 121 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 41

AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 818962, County of Ward, Parish of Mermaid Waters Gilston 18. Lot 23 on Survey Plan 222629, County of Robina Town Centre, 19-33 Robina Ward, Parish of Gilston Town Centre Drive, Robina 19. Lot 3 on Registered Plan 866700, County Stocklands Burleigh Heads Shopping of Ward, Parish of Mudgeeraba Centre, 149 West Burleigh Road, Burleigh 20. Lot 126 on Survey Plan 227782, County Treetops Plaza Shopping Centre, 7 of Ward, Parish of Mudgeeraba Classic Way, Burleigh Waters 21. Lot 977 on Registered Plan 205609, The Pines Shopping Centre, 13 – 31 County of Ward, Parish of Tallebudgera Guineas Creek Road, Elanora 22. Lot 10 on Registered Plan 164950 (BUP ‘Top of the Mark’ 3–15 Orchid 3410), County of Ward, Parish of Gilston Avenue, Surfers Paradise 23. Common Property of Broadbeach on the Broadbeach on the Park, 2685 Gold Park Survey Plan 146965, County of Coast Highway, Broadbeach Ward, Parish of Gilston 24. Lot 1000 on Survey Plan 126116, County Crestwood Plaza, corner Crestwood of Ward, Parish of Nerang Drive and Olsen Avenue, Molendinar 25. Lot 5 on SP182836, County of Ward, Westfield Shopping Centre, 11 Town Parish of Barrow Centre Drive, Helensvale 26. Lot 1 on RP132297, County of Ward, Ferry Road Shopping Centre, 253 Parish of Barrow Ferry Road, Southport 27. Lot 7 on RP853668, County of Ward, My Centre Nerang, 65 Station Street, Parish of Gilston Nerang 28. Lot 1 on SP159249, County of Ward, Chevron Renaissance Shopping Parish of Gilston Centre, 23 Ferny Ave, Surfers Paradise 29. Lot 99 on WD839540, County of Ward, Mariners Cove Shopping Centre, Parish of Gilston 60 Seaworld Drive, Main Beach 30. Lot 10 on SP139668, County of Ward, Centro Oxenford, 2 Cottonwood Parish of Barrow. Place, Oxenford

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 122 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 42

Part 3  Off-street regulated parking areas — designated parking spaces where an official traffic sign indicates no stopping, vehicles with trailers excepted

AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. 1. Boat ramp at Thrower Drive, Currumbin on the northern bank of Currumbin Creek 2. Boat ramp at Murlong Crescent, Palm Beach on the southern bank of Tallebudgera Creek 3. Boat ramp at Awoonga Avenue, Burleigh Heads on the northern bank of Tallebudgera Creek 4. Boat ramp at Arthur Earle Park, Nerang on the southern bank of the Nerang River 5. Boat ramp at TE Peters Drive, Broadbeach Waters at Miami Keys 6. Boat ramp at Naples Avenue, Surfers Paradise on the Isle of Capri, Nerang River 7. Boat ramp at Birt Avenue, Surfers Paradise on the Nerang River 8. Boat ramp at Waterways Drive, Main Beach at Proud Park on the southern bank of the Nerang River 9. Boat ramps at Muriel Henchman Drive, Main Beach, north of Seaworld 10. Boat ramp opposite North Street, Southport on The Broadwater 11. Boat ramps at the southern end of Marine Parade, Labrador on the northern bank of Loders Creek 12. Boat ramp at Harley Park near Labrador Street, Labrador at Marine Parade on The Broadwater 13. Boat ramp at Ray Street, Runaway Bay on the northern bank of Biggera Waters 14. Boat ramp at Jasmine Avenue, Hollywell near Centenary Drive on The

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 123 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 43

AREA SPECIFICATIONS LOCATION NO. Broadwater 15. Boat ramp at Paradise Parade, Paradise Point at the boat harbour on the southern bank of the Coomera River 16. Boat ramp at Oxley Parade, Paradise Point on the southern side of Jabiru Island 17. Boat ramp at Cabbage Tree Point Road on Southern Moreton Bay 18. Boat ramp at Pinaroo Street, Santa Barbara on the Coomera River 19. Boat ramp at Carrara Road, Carrara, on the Nerang River 20. Boat ramp at Pimpama Jacobs Well Road, Jacobs Well on Southern Moreton Bay 21. Boat ramp at Boykambil Esplanade, Hope Island on the Coomera River 22. Boat ramp at Holly Avenue, Hollywell near Centenary Drive, on the Broadwater. 23. Boat ramp at Esplanade, Coombabah near Turana Street. 24. Boat ramp at Watersports Lane, Oxenford (next to the M1) 25. Boat ramp at Alberton Road, Alberton 26. Boat ramp at Tallawood Road, Coomera 27. Boat ramp at Colman Road, Coomera 28. Boat ramp at Gawler Place, Upper Coomera 29. Boat ramp at Howard Street, Runaway Bay 30. Boat ramp at Ray Street, Runaway Bay

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 124 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 44

Schedule 3 Infringement notice penalty unit amounts for certain minor traffic offences Section 15

Column 1 Column 2 Transport Operations Infringement (Road Use Minor Traffic Offence Notice Penalty Management) Act 1995 Unit Amount provision 74 Contravention of an indication given by 0.8 penalty units an official traffic sign

106(1)(a)(i) Parking a vehicle in a designated parking 0.6 penalty units space unless a parking meter or parkatarea installed for the space indicates that the parking fee has been paid

106(1)(a)(ii) Parking a vehicle in a designated parking 0.6 penalty units space unless the person has done what is required by an authorised system that applies in relation to the space 106(1)(b) Parking a vehicle in a designated parking 0.6 penalty units space for a time longer than the maximum time indicated on the official traffic sign installed for the space

106(1)(c) Parking a vehicle in a designated parking 0.6 penalty units space if another vehicle is parked in the space

106(1)(d) Parking a vehicle in a designated parking 0.6 penalty units space so that the vehicle is not wholly within the space

Column 1 Column 2 Transport Operations (Road Use Management Infringement – Road Rules) Minor Traffic Offence Notice Penalty Regulation 2009 Unit Amount provision 167 Stopping on a length of road or in an area 1.25 penalty units to which a no stopping sign applies

169 Stopping at the side of a road marked with 1.25 penalty units a continuous yellow edge line

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 125 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 45

Column 1 Column 2 Transport Operations (Road Use Management Infringement – Road Rules) Minor Traffic Offence Notice Penalty Regulation 2009 Unit Amount provision 170(1) Stopping in an intersection 0.8 penalty units

170(2) Stopping within 20m of an intersection 0.8 penalty units with traffic lights unless permitted by a sign

170(4)(a) Stopping within 10m of an intersection 0.8 penalty units without traffic lights unless permitted by a sign

172(1) Stopping within 20m before a pedestrian 0.8 penalty units crossing that is not at an intersection otherwise than as permitted by a sign

172(1) Stopping within 10m after a pedestrian 0.8 penalty units crossing that is not at an intersection otherwise than as permitted by a sign

173(1) Stopping on a marked foot crossing that is 0.6 penalty units not at an intersection, or on the road within 10m before the traffic lights pole nearest to the driver at the crossing unless authorised by a parking control sign

173(1) Stopping on a marked foot crossing that is 0.6 penalty units not at an intersection, or on the road within 3m after the crossing unless authorised by a parking control sign

176(1) Stopping on a road contrary to a clearway 1.25 penalty units sign

179(1) Stopping an unauthorised vehicle in a 0.8 penalty units loading zone

179(2) Authorised driver who is permitted to stop 0.8 penalty units in a loading zone under section 179(1)(a), (b) or (c) staying continuously in the loading zone for longer than 30 mins or, if information on or with the loading zone signs applying to the loading zone indicates another time — the indicated time.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 126 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 46

Column 1 Column 2 Transport Operations (Road Use Management Infringement – Road Rules) Minor Traffic Offence Notice Penalty Regulation 2009 Unit Amount provision 179(2A) Authorised driver who is permitted to stop 0.8 penalty units in a loading zone under section 179(1)(d)(i) staying continuously in the zone for longer than 20 mins

179(2B) Authorised driver who is permitted to stop 0.8 penalty units in a loading zone under section 179(1)(d)(ii) staying continuously in the zone for longer than 2 mins

181 Unauthorised driver stopping in a works 0.8 penalty units zone

182(1) Stopping an unauthorised vehicle in a taxi 0.8 penalty units zone

183(1) Stopping an unauthorised vehicle in a bus 1.5 penalty units zone

183(1) Stopping a bus in a bus zone contrary to a 1.5 penalty units bus zone sign 185(1) Stopping an unauthorised vehicle in a 0.8 penalty units permit zone

186(1) Stopping in a mail zone 0.8 penalty units

189(1)(a) Stopping on a two way road between the 0.8 penalty units centre of the road and another vehicle parked at the side of the road

195(1) Stopping within 20m before a bus stop 0.8 penalty units unless permitted by a sign

195(1) Stopping within 10m after a bus stop 0.8 penalty units unless permitted by a sign

197(1) Stopping on a bicycle path, footpath, 0.8 penalty units shared path or dividing strip or a nature strip adjacent to a length of road in a built- up area unless permitted by a sign

198(2) Stopping on or across a driveway unless 0.8 penalty units dropping off or picking up, passengers

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 127 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Council of the City of Gold Coast Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 47

Column 1 Column 2 Transport Operations (Road Use Management Infringement – Road Rules) Minor Traffic Offence Notice Penalty Regulation 2009 Unit Amount provision 199 Stopping near a postbox 0.8 penalty units

200 Stopping a heavy vehicle or long vehicle 1.5 penalty units in a built-up area for longer than 1 hour

202 Stopping contrary to a motorbike parking 0.8 penalty units sign

203(1) Stopping contrary to a people with 2.5 penalty units disabilities parking sign

205(1)(a) Parking for longer than the period 0.6 penalty units indicated on a permissive parking sign

208(1) Parking on a two way road other than 0.8 penalty units parallel and as near as practicable to the far left side of the road

208(1) Parking on a one way road other than to 0.8 penalty units the far left or far right of the road unless permitted by a sign

208(1) Parking within 3m of a continuous 0.8 penalty units dividing line or dividing strip unless permitted by a sign.

210(1) Angle parking — failing to properly 0.6 penalty units position the vehicle.

211(2) Parking otherwise than completely within 0.6 penalty units the confines of a parking bay

Part 12 Other parking offences provided for in 1.25 penalty units Part 12 (Restrictions on stopping and parking)

849250_1 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 128 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 Attachment D

While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Support Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - resident Robina and efficient use of the road network. Increase time limit No ROBINA, QLD I visit the I think the Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area could be reduced even more in the Parkwood area around Henry Cotton Drive. Submission supports proposed amending law. Health and Feedback provided will be considered during future Knowledge parking reviews. I live one street outside the Precinct Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Southport Traffic Area Traffic Area Reduce/remove Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT, QLD I am a The GC Health & Knowledge precinct has been reduced which is good because it included alot of streets at Labrador that are no where near the hospital. The southport traffic area has been reduced as well which is good for private residents. resident of Robina's changes are good because on game days they do park erratically on that road. I don't think the parking area at bilinga should be extended. labrador who This submission supports implementation of proposed visits all these changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Oppose Support Yes - other traffic areas directly or indirectly impact this person. No LABRADOR, QLD Increases to the specified traffic areas means that I will no longer be able to support businesses in these areas as would normally do so i will be supporting businesses elsewhere. i see this as just a revenue raising exercise by GCCC. Robina stadium area This submission supports implementation of proposed and Southport changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - visitor traffic area directly or indirectly impact this person. No BONOGIN, QLD All Tourists In particular the GCHKP the parking is very expensive and there is no other option This submission supports implementation of proposed should pay not changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Oppose Support Oppose Support Yes - visitor residents directly or indirectly impact this person. No GILSTON, QLD Your with Parking permits for all rate payers must be made available While this submission does not support all proposed holding of changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe residents and efficient use of the road network. permits for rate payers living in unit blocks with over 25 units is just wrong and it will cost you at the SURFERS PARADISE, Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - other ballet box. Parking permit criteria No QLD Gold Coast Not really important Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area, Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - visitor Area No objection recorded No MERRIMAC, QLD There needs to be available parking for event goers This submission has raised an issue that Council is not able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Robina under State Government control. State parking issue No ROBINA, QLD Parking at all hospitals should be free as you are taking advantage of the sick! This submission has raised an issue that Council is not able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered under State Government control. Hospital parking issue No BURLEIGH WATERS, QLD Gold Coast Gold Coast The Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area covers large area that is used for parking now. Reducing the boundaries for allow more people to park freely in the old boundary. Health and Health and Knowledge Knowledge Precinct Precinct Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Traffic Area Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD Gold Coast Happy with existing Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - visitor Health Submission supports proposed amending law Leave as is. No SOUTHPORT, QLD All. I would like to I wish to be able to free park in any of these areas for a reasonable amount of time be able to free park in any of these areas for a reasonable Support Support Support Support Yes - other amount of time Submission supports proposed amending law No BURLEIGH WATERS, QLD Residents in these designated 2 Hour Parking have no options in some cases but to park in these areas and risk an obscene fine. What if you have a trades person doing work or a visitor staying with you? You must be practical in these parking Unhappy rules. Obviously rules made by overpaid white collar fat cats not affecting them. Do you want to see streets full of houses with cars parked all over the front garden and lawns destroyed by them. Get real! This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area directly or indirectly impact this person. No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Helensvale Helensvale Submission supports proposed amending law No HELENSVALE, QLD prefer as it is This submission supports retaining existing parking Leave as is. gold coast restrictions. CLEAR ISLAND WATERS, Not answered Oppose Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Yes - commuter robina stadium health precinct No QLD Parking arrangements are fine and shouldnt be changed This submission supports retaining existing parking CURRUMBIN WATERS, Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter all restrictions. Leave as is. No QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter All Great idea, I hope they get implemented Submission supports proposed amending law Happy!! No SOUTHPORT, QLD The proposed changes contains a gap, doesn't include duplex/townhouses. Multi residential has changed to 3 or more attached dwellings and residential includes detached dwellings This submission supports implementation of the proposed changes with the exception of a specific Not applicable Not applicable Support Not applicable Yes - resident Southern issue that may directly or indirectly impact this person. Comment for HR&LGS BILINGA, QLD So right in the thick of it . People leaving their cars for weeks sometimes months are resticting short term parking but also creating extremely dangerous conditions for us trying to exit our driveway onto . We limited time to get out with a constant stream of traffic including many buses and trucks going north and south on Golden Four compounded by traffic turning north onto us from . To rub salt in the wound most are not even vehicles from the gold coast . Let them pay for airport parking or get transport we shouldn't be their private parking lot .

But this 4 hours is only as good as your policing of it ! We've had vehicles parked for days in the 4 hour zone in with no permit and not been fined

Southern Area - Live corner of Not answered Not answered Support Support Yes - resident Bilinga Submission supports proposed amending law Enforcement No BILINGA, QLD Southport - redevelopment of site of old GC hospital will impact traffic flow & parking needs.

Robina - area [especially retail & education] struggling with no plan for public transport outside heavy rail & bus. Measured expansion proposed is a responsible response here.

GC Health - Significant traffic through area warrants regular review. Measured expansion proposed is a responsible response here. Southport, Southport, Robina, GC Robina, GC This submission supports implementation of proposed Health/Knowle Health/Knowle changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Not applicable Oppose Yes - commuter Yes - visitor dge Precinct dge Precinct directly or indirectly impact this person. No HELENSVALE, QLD Should be rolled out to those who live within a block or two from the beach. Summer is a nightmare to find a park outside ones own home. Sometime the street. Submission supports proposed amending law. University Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor hospital parking reviews. Wants timed beach parking No MIAMI, QLD I visit all of Streets are public places for parking and driving. No expansion or additional regulation of the parking areas is necessary. This submission supports retaining existing parking Leave as is. Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - visitor them restrictions. No MERMAID BEACH, QLD Gold Coast Health & Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area - I am happy that my street is still included in the area as we have many university students and hospital staff that would take away all our street parking if it was available Gold Coast Health & Knowledge Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident Precinct Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law Happy!! No PARKWOOD, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Robina What should be done is the managing the amount of illegal parking in all these area’s like ROBINA - people park and block footpaths and do all kinds of illegal parking which goes mostly unnoticed Submission supports proposed amending law Enforcement No ROBINA, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 129 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Robina Stadium: As this is events only, I can see this bring reasonable. However, the stadium itself should have parking given its proximity to the stadium, but free train rides from various stations could be another option as done in Brisbane. But if there isn't actual support for good alternatives, people will still drive.

Southern: It's unclear in the map, but it's obviously to combat airport parking in nearby streets.

Southport: This was way too big in the first place. What a waste of signage. If Council actually mandated sufficient viistor parking onsite then this wouldn't be an issue. Too often visitor and resident parking is relaxed. The Gold Coast does not have an established public transport system that is reliable, like Melbourne. So until then, approving developments without sufficient parking will be a problem for street parking.

This submission supports implementation of proposed All of them at changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Oppose Support Support Support Yes - visitor one point. directly or indirectly impact this person. Multiple issues/comments No WORONGARY, QLD Health area extended parking area would quickly be filled by students and not be helpful to health visitors and patients This submission supports implementation of proposed Health and changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Oppose Support Support Support Yes - visitor stadium directly or indirectly impact this person. No MERMAID WATERS, QLD We live in a 3 storey walkup of 21 units , only a subset of 2 bed units have 2 secure parking bays which means that the others have to rely on street parking which has been restricted - patently unfair as we all pay the same body corporate entitlements as the owners with 2 car parks. SURFERS PARADISE, Support Support Support Support Yes - resident chevron island, Surfers Paradise Submission supports proposed amending law Development No QLD GC Health I find it difficult to find parking in these areas, additional expansions and/or restrictions will make it much harder to access these areas. Precinct & This submission supports implementation of proposed Robina changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - commuter Stadium Area directly or indirectly impact this person. No BROADBEACH, QLD I am glad the area is being reduced - it was only necessary during the Commonwealth Games and to continue it is to restrict the rights of residents. Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD I generally support traffic area parking controls, as this will encourage car owners to ensure that the garage and driveway are maintained for cars and not storage or converted. All, usually for Also, this will also encourage residents and visitors to walk, cycle and use PT in higher density areas. business But still need to improve public transport connectivity, frequency and reliability. Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor purposes. Submission supports proposed amending law Public transport/access to No VARSITY LAKES, QLD I live and pay Regulated car parking because of poor Council planning should not affect the permanent residents of the area. It is not my fault affordable and abundant parking at the airport is not provided. What is going to happen when light rail heads my While this submission does not support all proposed Unhappy rates in way? Paid parking everywhere is my guess. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Tugun and and efficient use of the road network. frequent Bilinga beach Not answered Not answered Oppose Not answered Yes - commuter often. No TUGUN, QLD These are a revenue raising exercise. I strongly oppose these changes. I see no positive changes to traffic near my Southport residence. With the daily threat of being ticketed being nothing but a stress-or. What have you improved with the While this submission does not support all proposed revenue collected?? Very little...... Councillors pension plans. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Gold Coast STOP GOUGING your electorate... you thieves. and efficient use of the road network. Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - resident Yes - visitor Yes - other Southport Traffic Area Health precinct Unhappy No SOUTHPORT, QLD PARKING While this submission does not support all proposed Development changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe I have lived at Robina for the last six and a half years. and efficient use of the road network. I have a Motorhome which is my only form of transport. My Motorhome is 3.1 metres high and it won’t fit under my apartment where the car park is. I have been parking my Motorhome outside my apartment in the street since I bought it in Sept 2013. Initially there were no time limit signs erected but in 2017 (I think) signs went up. I contacted council and explained my situation and they gave me permission to continue parking out front. I also was given a parking sticker. Each year I have renewed my permit. Your call late last year advising that I will get a permit for 2019 but not beyond creates a major problem for me. I don’t wish to stop Motorhoming because as a single person it is my hobby. I’m away roughly 50% of the time but when I am home I have to have transport and my Motorhome is my transport. I’m not in financial position to be able to buy a car and store my Motorhome as I imagine most people do. If the Council refuses to consider my situation and allow me to continue doing what I’ve done for the last six years via a parking permit I will simply have to move my Motorhome every two hours between 9am and 5pm week days to avoid a fine. There is most times another space near my apartment and so I’ll be forced to shuffle every two hours. If I’m away without my Motorhome, I will have to impose on a neighbour to do the shuffling. I live at , Robina The end result of all this will be much inconvenience for me and no real change in the overall parking situation. Queensland 4226 and I have I’m not trying to be difficult here but I’d have no choice. been parking my Motorhome out My Motorhoming is a very big part of my life right now. I’m and I’m on my own and it’s a way to enjoy my life. I won’t give it up till I’m ready. front for nearly 7 years because it I trust this submission and detailed explanation can be considered with favour. won’t fit under my building where my allocated car parking place is. Robina Not answered Oppose Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Please read my note below. No ROBINA, QLD main beach. Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident main beach frequently unable to park due to events, visitors Submission supports proposed amending law No MAIN BEACH, QLD Availability of parking for appointments/visits to Gold Coast Hospital is vital to users This submission has raised an issue that Council is not Gold Coast able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is Oppose Support Support Not applicable Yes - visitor Health ate ta under State Government control. State parking issue No REEDY CREEK, QLD making it Health & Knowledge Precinct - more/free parking should be available to prevent people parking in residential areas. If it's a growing area, increase FREE parking. While this submission does not support all proposed difficult for Robina Stadium - more/free on-site parking should be readily available at an event space preventing anyone having the desire/need to park elsewhere. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe owners/tenants Southern Traffic Area - GC airport should have more on-site parking (multi-level?) and why not make it free for anyone with a flight itinerary? Become the only airport doing this!! and efficient use of the road network. at residential Southport Traffic Area - this is a planning/approval problem after living in Southport ( ). Multi-residential builds and commerical properties do not have enough parking. A 2 bedroom apartment is often rented, often by 2 people with 2 properties (ie. cars.....In most cases one of those cars will be on the streets. having to even obtain a Fix the root of the issue. Don't punish people (residents and commuters) for simply having a car. Better Planning!! permit), enforce MORE on-site parking availability at multi- residential and Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - other commercial Multiple issues/comments No REEDY CREEK, QLD We live in and find it difficult for guests and visitors to visit us after the allowed 2 hours and fear they may receive a ticket. This is a residential area and we pay enough for our rates, etc and don't need the added inconvenience of organising permits. I believe that all parking in our area should not have a limit. We have a child at Griffith university and needs easy access to the uni and free parking close by to ensure her safety and accessibility to the complex. Also people Gold Coast Health and visiting the hospital are there for a reason and by penalising them by limiting parking close by is wrong and unfair. make it easy for locals to use the facilities without the extra stress of worrying about parking. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident knowledge precinct Southport concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No SOUTHPORT, QLD the Gold I visit the Southport branch of the Embroiderers' Guild several times per week, at 7 Mick Vievers Way. I couldn't see anything there about that parking area [it also 'houses' the Special School, and hosts the various sporting games on a Coast Saturday]. A lot of our members are older and quite frail, so walking distances is often not within their capabilities. Could you please clarify how this area might be impacted, please. Embroiderer's Guild meets in the Heritage This appears to be off-street parking and therefore Not answered Not answered Not answered Not applicable Yes - visitor area off does not fall within Traffic Area restrictions. Communicate to customer MERMAID BEACH, QLD I am concerned that changes will make parking extremely difficult when attending these locations for work/pleasure/etc. I already avoid Southport because of the chaotic, poor-standard parking situation in existence now. While this submission does not support all proposed Southport Parking Study - comms re More off-street parking needs to be provided if parking changes are proposed, otherwise people will be driven away from these areas and go elsewhere. Southport is virtually a no-go zone now because of the parking restrictions and a lack of changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe parking availability viable alternative parking locations. Business will suffer further if parking restrictions are expanded.. and efficient use of the road network.

GC Health, Southport Traffic Area, Not applicable Support Not applicable Oppose Yes - visitor Southern Area. No ROBINA, QLD Not applicable Support Support Not applicable Yes - resident Robina Support expansion of Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No ROBINA, QLD Even with the current Southern Parking Zone, people are not obeying the restrictions as it is cheaper to get a $77 ticket than pay for long term parking at the airport, the cost of infringement tickets must rise and multiple tickets issued every day a Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Southern Traffic Area car is illegally parked, checks are made like once a month here, it is ridiculous as the streets around Golden Four Drive are all clogged Submission supports proposed amending law Enforcement No BILINGA, QLD Parking fees are hurting retailers This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Oppose Support Yes - resident Southport directly or indirectly impact this person. Paid parking No SOUTHPORT, QLD Current too strict. Need to change also Surfers/broadbeach area. Difficult for residents. Submission supports proposed amending law. Feedback provided will be considered during future SURFERS PARADISE, Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport Southport parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No QLD Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area The existing boundary took into effect the influence of the Commonwealth Games. It is unnecessary now. Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Factually, we as a family have stopped supporting Businesses in Surfers Paradise on a weekend and Southport, Burleigh and Nobbys Beach shops and restaurants due to the expense of parking. The council make a fortune in everyway from This submission does not relate directly to the rate payers and residents alike. This is just greedy and unnecessary. Another perfect example of the council not looking after the local. proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback Southport / provided will be considered during future parking Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Nobbys Beach Robina All - reviews. Paid parking No MIAMI, QLD There should be more free parking. This submission does not relate directly to the Parking prices are outrageous, and unnecessary. Especially where once was free along Burleigh heads/Burleigh hill. proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback Not my local Better option is free parking with 1-3hr time limit. provided will be considered during future parking Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Yes - other area reviews. Paid parking No MERMAID WATERS, QLD This is absolutely outrageous! Not only council constantly punishes every visitor and resident with constant fines now we have to get a permit! NO! build car parks and clearer signs, build wider street and plan for the future. While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe SURFERS PARADISE, Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor Southport and efficient use of the road network. Unhappy No QLD All BROADBEACH WATERS, Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor All Submission supports proposed amending law No QLD Robina stadium and southern traffic areas Robina Stadium and Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor southern traffic Submission supports proposed amending law No TUGUN, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 130 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Health and knowledge precinct concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Not applicable Support Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Robina Robina Submission supports proposed amending law No ROBINA, QLD Robina nothing to say Stadium and Gold Coast Health and Knowledge While this submission does not support all proposed Precinct changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe SURFERS PARADISE, Support Support Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor Traffic Area and efficient use of the road network. No QLD Not applicable Support Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Robina Robina Submission supports proposed amending law No ROBINA, QLD Southern When visiting friends and relatives I sometimes walk home and leave the car parked until the next day due to drink driving laws Not applicable Not applicable Support Not applicable Yes - visitor Traffic area Submission supports proposed amending law No COOLANGATTA, QLD Robina already has far too many restrictions in place that inhibit people actually attending games. Streets aren’t sign posted as being 2 minute only during event day. 2 minutes is ridiculous. Maybe 20 minutes to let people shopping etc get things While this submission does not support all proposed Traffic Area signage done. Many visitors to Town Centre have been caught out simply parking near entrance to pop in for a quick shop. Sign them properly so people actually know. ‘This street is in an event area - on event days a 2 minute parking limit exists.’ A changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe flashing sign saying there’s an event in doesn’t really let people know about restrictions and visitors to the coast wouldn’t have half an hour to head to the website to try and track down the restrictions. Most of the area involved in the restrictions is and efficient use of the road network. Robina and not even residential and would not even be adversely affected by allowing limited parking on event days. CURRUMBIN WATERS, Oppose Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Yes - visitor Griffith Uni Parking near hospital - paid parking so expensive - and already no parking for those doing shorts stops to Uni. Help reduce parking fees or expand affordable parking areas. No QLD Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area The proposed reduction is justified and corresponds to the busiest areas in Southport. Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD The traffic area in Southport had an impact on when it was changed last year and resulted in additional costs for when I was studying in the Southport area. The change would offer alternative options to people in the same circumstances when you are parking for a short time but over the general times available in the parking area. I have visited all these traffic Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor areas. Submission supports proposed amending law No VARSITY LAKES, QLD Reducing the traffic area boundary in the southern area by excluding Golden Four Drive gives residents in a high density area better parking options while maintaining the 4 hour parking window along the beachfront makes sense allowing turnover of beach visitor parking. This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Oppose Not applicable Support Not applicable Yes - resident Southern directly or indirectly impact this person. Remove my street from Traffic Area No TUGUN, QLD I am a owner / occupier in the Southport Traffic Area. During the day it is difficult for visitors to park in street due to time limit. Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support Not applicable Support Not applicable Yes - resident Yes - visitor Southern Hospital traffic Southern Traffic, backing up on to the highway trying to take an exit is way to dangerous. Submission supports proposed amending law Motorway exit dangerous No PIMPAMA, QLD Hardly any crowds at the stadium for Titans matches. But traffic restriction are like there's 100,000 people for every home game! No need to have 4 hours or more of restrictions when less than 5000 people turn up for games. State parking issue This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Support Support Yes - resident Robina Stadium directly or indirectly impact this person. No ROBINA, QLD I live in and the 2 hour parking here was ridiculous. No one commuting would use our street for tram parking anyway! Gold Coast Health and Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD We are in Chirn Park and there was never any issues with parking on our street. We understand that the forecast for the Commonwealth Games was for increased traffic and we were happy for that to be a temporary change. Requiring a guest Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic area pass for an already empty street was not a positive move for the area. concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Southport Reducing the Traffic Area at Southport (North) is most likely beneficial as that area isn't busy as the South of it. I use daily (weekdays) the Carey Park to park my car for work and it is already quite busy. As long as that Park is kept everything Support Support Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Traffic Area should be fine (there was a preposterous project of building a casino over there, as we did have problems enough with lack of (long-term) parking space in Southport). Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD We live in which is now outside the proposed traffic areas which should have been the case right from the start. At NO TIME was Commonwealth Games traffic ever an issue in our cul-de-sac. Gold Coast Health and Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Yes - commuter Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area. as above concerns addressed with proposed changes No PARKWOOD, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident SOUTHPORT Existing Traffic Areas in proposed excluded areas have never been enforced, and dashboard permits are a poor solution. I support a reduction of zones to enable enforcement of overparked areas. Submission supports proposed amending law Enforcement No SOUTHPORT, QLD With the traffic restrictions that are in place now as a nurse I am pushed into having to pay a ridiculously high price in the hospital carpark and when you work full time or even part time that equates to a lot of money, whereas the changed Submission supports proposed amending law. boundaries will allow more street parking Feedback provided will be considered during future I live in Mermaid Beach and the 3 hour parking around the tram station at Pacific Fair pushes all the people driving and then catching the tram into my street at , why isn't this 3 hour limit being changed, every morning the street is parking reviews. filled with cars from people parking and then walking to the tram and becomes very annoying if you have people come to visit or do work on your house as they have nowhere to park

gold coast Support Support Not applicable Support Yes - commuter health precinct State parking issue No MERMAID BEACH, QLD I cannot visit friends who live in the area due to cars parked all day. They have even had cars take their spots that is reserved for them. This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Oppose Support Support Support Yes - visitor Southern directly or indirectly impact this person. No CURRUMBIN, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor Robina Developers need to be held responsible for providing enough parking spaces + visitors section in their developments Submission supports proposed amending law Development No VARSITY LAKES, QLD Council will always see opportunities to increase revenues using fines as the measure. It's a public service culture and one doubts if that can change. In short the Rate Payer pays and waste is hidden. While this submission does not support all proposed Customer Service in reality is a convenient term in the public service, as compared to private enterprise who measure their impact by successful customer service aligned with cost control, fair profits, and ownership of issues. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network.

Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter All Unhappy No RUNAWAY BAY, QLD Seems okay in the area where I live Southport 4215 - however think needs more regular patrols to enforce any violations. Noticed no enough and complaints about parking infringements happening by individuals taking far too long for While this submission does not support all proposed Enforcement council parking officers to attend. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network. Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Oppose No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor Cbus Stadium If only people were considering fellow neighbours and residents that live in Varsity lakes it's extremely hard to get into streets and out of your own driveway too that's if people don't park across it Submission supports proposed amending law Enforcement No VARSITY LAKES, QLD Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport There is no parking issue in my community of Southport Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD There is way too much timed parking on the Gold Coast especially Golden Four Drive! This submission supports implementation of proposed I visit all of changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Oppose Support Yes - visitor them ! directly or indirectly impact this person. No TUGUN, QLD Robina, General feedback - TAPPS is a solution which has introduced to a problem which the Council has created. Reducing parking option/solutions in these high density, high visitor or CBD areas is the main problem. City Council should plan ahead Development Southport and and develop suitable parking infrastructure for population growth and have large/appropriate parking facilities across the Gold Coast. If you think it's bad now, it will only get worse in the future. Health and City Plan should also change to force new developments (stand alone housing and unit/complex) to increase the number of car spaces. For example 2 car parking spaces for 1 or 2 bedroom dwellings, 3 car parking spaces for 3 or more bedroom This submission supports implementation of proposed Knowledge dwellings. Yes I understand it may cost developers and builder more to build but our City Plan is meant to suit developers, it's meant to suit local residents. We need more future proofing projects! changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Support Support Yes - visitor precinct directly or indirectly impact this person. No VARSITY LAKES, QLD There is way too much timed parking on the Coast, especially near the airport! This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Oppose Support Yes - visitor I visit them all ! directly or indirectly impact this person. No TUGUN, QLD We never had a problem with people other than residents parking for hours in our court. It was always a worry if we had friends over or I visited a friend in the area and stayed more than the 2 hour time limit. Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident , Parkwood concerns addressed with proposed changes No PARKWOOD, QLD Southport I sometimes require my car during the business day to get to and from meetings that are not easily accessible via public transport. Long term parking has become increasingly difficult to find as a result of the Southport changes that were Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - commuter Traffic Area implemented. The reduced area will assist in alleviating this issue. Submission supports proposed amending law No PACIFIC PINES, QLD I am a Regarding the Southern Traffic Area: Please consider extending the area further to include Kirra (Musgrave Street from Gilltrap Park to Kirra Hill) given the recent influx of cars being parked in the area from days/ weeks presumably to avoid Submission supports proposed amending law. resident in the airport parking fees. I believe this is because of the introduction of timed parking restrictions in the Bilinga area. Feedback provided will be considered during future area parking reviews. immediately adjacent to the Southern Support Support Support Support Yes - other Traffic Area Extend Traffic Area COOLANGATTA, QLD Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport ( ) Agree southport area can be reduced Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD Southport traffic area namely Southport traffic area on Wilson Street. There’s nothing need for the traffic area to be so far North. While this submission does not support all proposed . There is no need for changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe permit parking as we are not near and efficient use of the road network. Not answered Not answered Not answered Oppose Yes - resident anything of interest. Remove my street from Traffic Area No LABRADOR, QLD My parents live on and are unable to purchase a parking permit and the street always has plenty of parking but due to the parking zone residents are getting parking tickets. Please reconsider out of the zone. Submission supports proposed amending law. Feedback provided will be considered during future Gold Coast health and Southport parking reviews. Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Knowledge Precinct Traffic Traffic area Remove my street from Traffic Area No LABRADOR, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 131 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

southport Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter traffic Development No SOUTHPORT, QLD I live in the southport area. I have witnessed many people who park on the street even if they have off street parking due to having a full garage i.e using as storage or cannot be bothered to use their garage. Have a neighbour who does this This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Support Oppose Yes - resident Southport traffic area directly or indirectly impact this person. No SOUTHPORT, QLD Knowledge precinct - Parkwood I support the changes to parking on Parkwood Boulevard. Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Boulevard Submission supports proposed amending law No PARKWOOD, QLD All of them, I Generally I feel there's no logical reason to extend the boundaries around the GC airport or the Robina Stadium and the proposed reductions to Southport CBD and the Health precinct are sensible changes that I support. Reduce some of the live in the complexity for the broader population by keeping it simple and allowing on street parking. fringe of the Southport CBD and While this submission does not support all proposed frequent all 4 changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - visitor areas and efficient use of the road network. No ASHMORE, QLD require particular People need to be able to access high density areas for a heaps of reasons. To quote a job, to drop off or collect, to make a delivery and to simply visit their friends and family. If there is no free parking then you will isolate residents (especially Paid parking/Development infrequent Southport is older people) from the rest of the Gold Coast. You need to think about this when approving high density Housing.There needs to be free parking but perhaps time limited eg 1-2 hour parking in very difficult to This submission does not relate directly to the most of the get a park. proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback areas for the That is The provided will be considered during future parking Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter Yes - visitor purposes of GCCC reviews. No OXENFORD, QLD Southport It would be good to have free parking that extends for more than 2 hours around work areas in the Southport area. Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter traffic area Submission supports proposed amending law No MUDGEERABA, QLD We live in Parkwood and have 3 adult children living at home, but only allowed one resident parking permit. We were never affected by students at Griffith or the hospital. We were never affected by Commonwealth Games traffic. Get rid of the two hour parking on and surrounding streets. Just ridiculous. We cannot afford the fines.

Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Gold Coast Health precinct concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Gold Coast health and I live at Parkwood and have not been happy with the current 2 hour parking restrictions and would be very happy with the new proposed change. Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident knowledge precinct Submission supports proposed amending law No PARKWOOD, QLD The initial traffic area has been overkill, and created a lot of unnecessary difficulties for residents since the 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games when the city was a ghost town. Instead of enforcing parking zones, it would be nice to see council give incentives for the private sector to create parking spots. For example, if I could go back in time about 30 years I would build multi-level car parks throughout the Health and Knowledge Precinct because I could get a ton of patronage if I charged less than the $17 Wilson Parking is charging for three hours or more. One factor the traffic area fails to take into consideration is the number of multi-dwelling complexes where parking is at a premium and overflow parking is frequent. Gold Coast Health and Again, council should not be trying to enforce parking rather encourage more private sector engagement to relieve parking congestion without costing the rate payer and subsidising those parking charges so they are low and affordable to all. Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law Development No LABRADOR, QLD There is no traffic from the trans link nor the GCHKP anywhere near our street and it serves no purpose to have restrictions. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident GCHKP - concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - other Not my area I do not live in these traffic areas No objection recorded No COOMBABAH, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 132 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Gold Coast Health Submission supports proposed amending law Permit issue No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - visitor Health Exclusion zone is unreasonable and feels like revenue making for car parks Submission supports proposed amending law No ARUNDEL, QLD None of the changes do affect us in any way. Traffic Engineering to consider

There is however a dangerous situation where Manly drive joins Cottesloe drive. A dangerous corner which could easily be rectified by painting a 100 mtr yellow, no parking line and placing a “No U turn” sign. Coming from Manly drive and turning left or right onto Cottesloe is always a gamble, because parked cars make it impossible to see oncoming traffic. This submission does not relate directly to the An accident waiting to happen. proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback Sincerely, provided will be directed to the relevant section for their Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable consideration. No ROBINA, QLD As a visitor to most of the Areas, I am opposed to introducing change again to the parking arrangements. Generally parking is a nightmare across the city with no real additional investment in public transport I visit most of This submission supports retaining existing parking Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor the Areas restrictions. Leave as is. No HOPE ISLAND, QLD Support Support Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Robina There is a need to change traffic areas during special events,so the local residents are not effected Submission supports proposed amending law No ROBINA, QLD Goldcoast health and knowledge We live in this precinct and have never had a problem with traffic prior to the 2 hour restrictions being implemented. Our street is not used for parking for the tram or other public transport by the public as it is too far from these facilities. Also the Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident precinct traffic signs are unnecessary and an eye sore in the placement of the signs concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor southport southport Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Southern Gold Coast Health area Traffic area, Southport Gold Coast Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Traffic area health area Submission supports proposed amending law No BROADBEACH, QLD You are bringing additional traffic into areas that are already congested. You are affecting ratepayers and residents. Don’t ask for feedback if you aren’t going to listen and support the people who pay your wages! While this submission does not support all proposed Unhappy changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Oppose Oppose Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Yes - other and efficient use of the road network. No GOLD COAST MC, QLD Traffic is already an issue for us as residents. Stop the stupidity. While this submission does not support all proposed Unhappy changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Oppose Oppose Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Yes - other and efficient use of the road network. No AUSTRALIA FAIR, QLD Ok While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Main Beach All All and efficient use of the road network. No MAIN BEACH, QLD All the two hour parking restrictions in residential area restrict visitors as we have to keep on moving cars to ensure we do not get fined. A lot of these restrictions came in prior to the Commonwealth Games and rate payers are not happy. This submission supports implementation of proposed Southport changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Not applicable Oppose Support Yes - visitor traffic area directly or indirectly impact this person. No BUNDALL, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor There’re is paid parking in the areas I need to go Submission supports proposed amending law Paid parking No SOUTHPORT, QLD I work within I work for which is a not for profit organization this would affect my cappasity to do my job properly meeting and so on While this submission does not support all proposed all of these changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter areas and efficient use of the road network. Communicate to customer No BURLEIGH HEADS, QLD Southport Southern traffic area visitor to beach and SLSC carnival events. Southport visitor to events While this submission does not support all proposed Southern changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe traffic area, and efficient use of the road network. Gold Coast health Southport. knowledge Southern Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter Yes - visitor precinct Traffuc area No LABRADOR, QLD There isn't enough free parking for locals anywhere on the coast and we pay enough taxes so we shouldn't be looking at revenue raising from any traffic area This submission supports implementation of proposed Southern changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor traffic area Gchp directly or indirectly impact this person. Paid parking No NERANG, QLD southport, regulating parking is not the solution, additional infrastructure is surely needed on the gold coast. Infrastructure directly correlates to positive increase in GDP/promotes jobs While this submission does not support all proposed gold coast changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - resident Yes - commuter robina stadium health and efficient use of the road network. No BURLEIGH WATERS, QLD WTF is it with this council? Parking is out of control! please charge people to park in high volume/demand areas! This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southern directly or indirectly impact this person. Paid parking No ELANORA, QLD I should be able to park and/or drive to attend various areas or to attend events . Trans trains are supposed to help reduce traffic on roads so why prevent people residents & or visitors parking in streets While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe SURFERS PARADISE, Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - resident Yes - commuter and efficient use of the road network. Public transport/access to No QLD I support reducing Southport parking boundary to encourage business and visitors This submission supports implementation of proposed Southport and changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Not applicable Support Yes - visitor Robina directly or indirectly impact this person. No BURLEIGH HEADS, QLD In general things have to be convenient to people. No particular This submission supports implementation of proposed interest as changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Oppose Not applicable Yes - other such directly or indirectly impact this person. No VARSITY LAKES, QLD You want me to do your job? No, thank you. This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - visitor All areas directly or indirectly impact this person. No ROBINA, QLD Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport The previous zoning was too agreesive and predominantly inconvenient for residents to park outside their own home. The proposed changes are clever governing. I strongly support this recommendation Submission supports proposed amending law Happy!! No SOUTHPORT BC, QLD I work at the University Hospital and often the Secure Car Park is full and turning patients away. Putting more stress on the already limited parking options is completely unfeasible This submission has raised an issue that Council is not University able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor Hospital under State Government control. State parking issue No BUNDALL, QLD I noticed that after last Sunday's match, taxis were parked on the road very close to the entrance of our Complex (Maximes) making it quite tricky for residents to stop (in the middle of the road) and enter our driveway without getting hit from the While this submission does not support all proposed Enforcement car following. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe ROBINA TOWN CENTRE, Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Robina stadium and efficient use of the road network. No QLD Southport parking fine the way it is. Its bad enough already last time council changed it we got even less free parking and parking officers relentless at Southport you cant even be a couple of minutes over and they book you. We have gotten used Leave as is. to current parking in Southport and it works for us Visitor to gc health precinct Commuter to regularly and This submission supports retaining existing parking Support Oppose Not applicable Oppose Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport daily robina stadium restrictions. No ASHMORE, QLD I live close to this area and travel to it and through it daily. I have had issues on event days already dropping my nephew at the station, returning a child home and accessing a medical appointment. I am against the current area being extended. This submission supports implementation of proposed Robina Traffic changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Support Support Yes - commuter Area directly or indirectly impact this person. No MUDGEERABA, QLD We need less The cost of living is expensive enough, & paid parking (especially in Southport)just creates unnecessary additional costs. When attending GC health precinct it's because you can't afford private care - adding additional parking costs doesn't help regulated this While this submission does not support all proposed parking areas changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Oppose Oppose Support Yes - other not more and efficient use of the road network. Paid parking No UPPER COOMERA, QLD At times,during a 12 month period,I would visit all these traffic areas,for different reasons.So it is not just going to one area.The public transport system,leaves a lot to be desired,leaving people the only choise but to drive and then park. While this submission does not support all proposed Not living in changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe any of these and efficient use of the road network. areas I do at times visit from time to time.Therefore I need to drive Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor and park. Public transport/access to No NERANG, QLD Southport, reduce the 2H area and make parking free on weekends Reduce/remove Traffic Area This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - commuter southport southport directly or indirectly impact this person. No PACIFIC PINES, QLD Like public buildings/ library or court or hospital. They has to have 3 hrs free parking! While this submission does not support all proposed I don’t think parking people’s walking around all the time is waist of tax money! Better to 9-12 12-3 3-6 to check and same area makes 7-11.11-2, 2-5 parking too. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe SURFERS PARADISE, Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Surfers paradise Southport So, they can chose whichever parking to park for free! and efficient use of the road network. Paid parking No QLD I believe there is sufficient parking space available in the Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area without the need for permits or control. I am also concerned that there aren't any places you can drop passengers off for the tram in Southport and other locations. Some people drive people to tram stations to then use public transport. I don't know why there aren't any drop-off zones near these locations, because it's dangerous trying to drop people off. Some people use a This submission supports implementation of proposed Gold Coast Health and mix of private and public transport. changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Not applicable Oppose Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area directly or indirectly impact this person. Public transport/access to No LABRADOR, QLD Meter parking 1to 2 hours is too expensive which means I only visit southport when I have too This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Not applicable Support Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Southport directly or indirectly impact this person. Paid parking No KINGSCLIFF, NSW Robina I don't agree with any restrictions around Robina Stadium - Council needs to look at a multi level parking station with low cost parking and this would eliminate the cost of paying traffic control staff and police etc etc. I also think that the buses Stadium need to have access closer to the stadium so people don't have to walk up and downs stairs to nearby Robina Stadium to catch a bus which should be dropping people directly at the stadium. While this submission does not support the proposed (Event) Traffic changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Yes - visitor Area and efficient use of the road network. State parking issue BROADBEACH, QLD It will be an exercise in futility if you don't first improve the co-ordination of the bus services. For example, there is one bus/hour from my area to the Pines. It takes a second bus to access a third bus to Broadbeach to catch the tram to the Gold Coast University Hospital. Why can't we have a bus interchange in this local area. Then I wouldn't need a car. To go to Robina Hospital, it takes 2 buses to get to Varsity Lakes station followed by a train trip. WHY ??? This is an important problem for the aged. Submission supports proposed amending law. This submission has raised an issue that Council is not able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is not Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Southern Southport under Local Government control. Public transport/access to No ELANORA, QLD Not applicable Not answered Not applicable Not applicable I travel to the Health Precinct by Light Rail so parking does not affect me No objection recorded No BROADBEACH, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 133 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

The elected mayor has not kept true to his promise and election policy for which he campaigned with and was elected for. The mayor campaigned with official policy stating clearly, and I quote; "I will reign in Council's over-zealous parking section if I'm elected Mayor in April. I will introduce free parking on weekends and public holidays to encourage day trippers to return to the Gold Coast and give locals a reprieve from oppressive weekday parking fees."

There is no evidence to suggest council did anything other than the opposite of this, and since then have widened their reach with parking regulation, sensors, time limits, zones and vicious unrelenting enforcement (and penalties).

It is high time this council stopped using parking fees and fines to prop up its unsustainable spending idealism on items such as year-round mayoral electioneering and self promotion, radical personal pet project investigations, private infrastructure disguised as public infrastructure and the false impression that rates are being kept low and sensible.

I support the reduction of parking limit areas, the relaxing and toning down of draconian and iron-fisted enforcement of metered and timed spaces and the removal of the 3-hour limit in places near the beach (excluding the CBD areas of Surfers and Broadbeach where they are effective).

All of them I support a total review of the attitudes, behaviours and methodology employed by parking enforcement officers and more transparent, forgiving and realistic processes in the delivery of parking regulation and management. This submission supports implementation of proposed except Robina changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Not applicable Oppose Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Stadium area directly or indirectly impact this person. No NERANG, QLD Please return longer parking in surfers, broadbeach, miami, Burleigh, as the 3 hour parking was only meant to be for comm games. Also you need to look at permits for apartments bigger than 20 units, incl for residents and a visitors permit. SURFERS PARADISE, Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter All. Submission supports proposed amending law Permit issue No QLD Many businesses have been adversely affected with the parking restrictions. I have noted many workers parking in shopping centre car parks because they can't get long stay on street parking , then patrons not being able to get a parking spot.

Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD The Southport I live in the current parking permit area of Southport in where we have no problems with parking And the permits have been extremely annoying and unnecessary. So I’m looking forward to the area being reduced so I am no longer in Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor area the parking permit area concerns addressed with proposed changes No SOUTHPORT, QLD Restrictions near the Robina Hospital are fine the way they are. Road there is chaotic already and as I work at the hospital, it's hard enough to park now. If more restrictions were put there, it will be impossible!! Reduce/remove Traffic Area This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - resident ROBINA directly or indirectly impact this person. No MUDGEERABA, QLD The blanket conditions relating to the extension of the GF Drive scheme are to strict for some properties. In my case I have offstreet parking available but my current vehicle (Ford Territory SUV) does not fit into my garage and it is necessary for While this submission does not support all proposed me to park onstreet. The limitation of the number of permits available for each block of units is too restrictive. Each application should be considered on merit not determined on the basis of strict guidelines only. Resident permits should be at no changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe cost to residents. and efficient use of the road network.

Not answered Not answered Oppose Not answered Yes - resident Bilinga , extension Permit issue No BILINGA, QLD Too many student parks and Workers of Hospital parking within area that as a visitor you need to catch public transport at a cost to get into zone. Should be able to park close at no fee. This submission has raised an issue that Council is not University Hospital Gold Coast able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is Support Support Support Oppose Yes - visitor Health under State Government control. No ASHMORE, QLD The current boundaries are excessive for their purpose, and make Southport residential areas unnecessarily difficult to visit during weekdays. SURFERS PARADISE, Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - visitor Southport Submission supports proposed amending law No QLD I pay $176 dollars a month for parking at the hospital for work This submission has raised an issue that Council is not University Hospital Gold Coast We need more parking for people that can not afford paid parking. able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is BROADBEACH WATERS, Support Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter health precinct under State Government control. No QLD southern Robina stadium is a great facility and improved access to this venue would be of benefit. As a southern GC resident, even a train to the stadium would be beneficial. Submission supports proposed amending law Not applicable Support Support Not applicable Yes - resident Yes - commuter southern precint precint State parking issue No TUGUN HEIGHTS, QLD Following on - has there been a significant increase to vehicle traffic into this area? Southern Traffic Area - with the increase of traffic to the southern traffic area will this then push visitors to Prather areas for beach access, how will this impact further up the coast towards Burleigh? Has there been a significant This submission supports implementation of proposed increase in changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Oppose Support Yes - visitor vehicles directly or indirectly impact this person. No BURLEIGH WATERS, QLD 3 hour's parking limit.. not enough controlling - Cars parking here for more hours and even days Not applicable Not applicable Not answered Not applicable Yes - resident , Mermaid Bach No objection recorded Enforcement No MERMAID BEACH, QLD I do not want paid parking While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - resident Southport traffic area and efficient use of the road network. Paid parking No LABRADOR, QLD 3 hours parking limit Not answered Not answered Not applicable Not answered Yes - resident Southern TrafficArea not enough controls - Cars parking here for hours and Days No objection recorded Enforcement - duplicate of line 187? No MERMAID BEACH, QLD There should be more cheap, free, or discounted parking areas available to tafe students with a valid student id. This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback provided will be considered during future parking BROADBEACH WATERS, Not answered Not answered Not answered Oppose Yes - commuter Tafe southport reviews. Paid parking No QLD Southport I boycott businesses in the areas of paid parking. I oppose changes. While this submission does not support all proposed traffic area. I am family to a Gold Coast resident & sometimes reside there. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Please and efficient use of the road network. exclude or I will boycott your local UPPER MOUNT Not answered Not answered Not answered Oppose Yes - visitor businesses Paid parking No GRAVATT BC, QLD The Len Fox Park area attracts visitors for kiteboarding and sailboarding. This area brings a lot of money to local businesses who cater to this sport, the largest of which may be SurfFX. Visitors drive from Brisbane where other spots exist. I While this submission does not support all proposed oppose the changes in relation to lost funds to local businesses, driving progression of these sports for the Olympic games, general fitness & mental well-being. Additionally the Gold Coast is waging war on the mental health of its citizens by changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe UPPER MOUNT Not answered Not answered Not answered Oppose Yes - visitor Southport delving into the pockets of Australian citizens an authoritarianly fining those who fail to comply, without leniency & grace periods like other councils apply. I oppose the changes. and efficient use of the road network. No GRAVATT BC, QLD I kitsurf and windsurf in the area and appreciate the parking space. While this submission does not support all proposed Southport changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Yes - visitor Traffic Area and efficient use of the road network. No TOOWONG, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 134 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Q4 (Please Q2 (Do the specify Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q2 (Do the changes to the which of Q5 (Please support the support the support the support the changes to the Traffic Areas the above specify proposed proposed proposed proposed Traffic Areas affect you Q2 (Do the changes Q2 (Do the listed which of amendments to the amendments to amendments to amendments affect you because: ) you to the Traffic Areas changes to the Traffic the above Traffic Areas?) the Traffic the Traffic to the Traffic because: ) you are a commuter affect you because: Traffic Areas Q3 (Please specify which Area (s) listed Q6 (If Gold Coast Health Areas?) Robina Areas?) Areas?) are a resident to one or more ) you are a visitor to affect you of the above listed Traffic you are a Traffic Area other, and Knowledge Stadium (Event) Southern Southport in one of these of these Traffic one or more of because: ) Areas you are a resident commuter (s) you are please Q7 (Please ensure your comments relate to Traffic Areas listed only for this submission and are supported by the grounds (reasons for your submission) and the facts and circumstances (the Changes Precinct Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Areas Areas these Traffic Areas other. of) to) a visitor to) specify) evidence for your reasons). (Please indicate which Traffic Area (s) your submission refers to.)) Submission Consideration by City Officers Brief overview Recommended Q10 (Suburb) No comments on the changes proposed since they do not affect me. I live on Chevron Island. In respect to Chevron Island and during events on the island, I suggest that City of Gold Coast consider temporarily shutting down the parking spaces on the park side of Anembo Street (West) from Thomas Drive up to Aruma St and with traffic This submission does not relate directly to the control assistance, making Aruma and Anembo St from Aruma to Stanhill Drive a one way loop. This will allow busses and large vehicles who cannot travel along Thomas drive the ability to safely and quickly transit this area. This will provide proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback timetable surety for the buses. The area becomes gridlocked during said events caused by the narrow width of the road when car parking is on both sides. It is difficult in this area normally, however with car parking at a premium, I cannot see provided will be considered during future parking Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Council permanently deleting parking on one side. Many residents and visitors come back to their cars only to find there drivers side mirror damaged and sitting on the road. reviews. Public transport/access to No CHEVRON ISLAND, QLD Southern I support this change to prevent airport parking within the residential area. Not applicable Not applicable Support Not applicable Yes - visitor Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No TUGUN, QLD GC Health I work at both hospitals within the stated precincts and support the new proposals for parking in the Southport area but believe that the parking areas at Robina for workers in the Health Precincts need to be addressed especially when events are Precinct & held at the stadium. Should health care workers apply for permits to allow for parking in this area for game days & if so are we should be included in the lists that allows for application for parking. Robina Stadium Support Support Not applicable Not applicable Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Precinct As above Submission supports proposed amending law Communicate to customer No MERMAID BEACH, QLD Robina No evidence but as long as permits can be obtained the traffic areas are a good idea. Stadium This submission supports implementation of proposed (Event) Traffic changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Support Support Yes - visitor Area directly or indirectly impact this person. No VARSITY LAKES, QLD Can I please have a refund for the unfair fine I was made to pay when you erected a 2h parking sign after I'd parked and then fined everyone in the street 2 hours later? This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback Southport provided will be considered during future parking Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Traffic Area reviews. Communicate to customer No BURLEIGH HEADS, QLD volunteer at Traffic Area. I understand very few residences will be effected. I believe a good deal of study and consultation must have been done to see a need for the changes. We must always plan ahead. the library and Visiting Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor attend the Bilinga. Submission supports proposed amending law No BIGGERA WATERS, QLD Robina Stadium when being used it cause us locals heaps of problems trying to get the the shopping centre. I object to being told I can’t use this road to get to & from the shopping centre. It very time consuming try to go another route While this submission does not support all proposed Robina changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Support Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor stadium and efficient use of the road network. No MUDGEERABA, QLD Support Support Support Support no Submission supports proposed amending law No ASHMORE, QLD Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area: the current area to me is too large and not good for both residents and hospital patients who are not rich enough to pay private insurance or high parking fees at the Hospital carpark. Southport Traffic Area: By reducing the current area, people will have less restriction time-wise so that they have enough time to enjoy what Southport can offer at their pace. Gold Coast Health and Knowledge This submission supports implementation of proposed Precinct Southport changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Traffic Area Traffic Area directly or indirectly impact this person. No BENOWA, QLD Gold Coast The traffic limitations surrounding both of these precincts make it difficult to find or pay for parking. Health and Support Support Not applicable Support Yes - visitor Southport. Submission supports proposed amending law No GAVEN, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Southern Excellent existing 4 hour parking round airport Should be expanded Submission supports proposed amending law Extend Traffic Area No BILINGA, QLD Southern area. While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southern Southern Southern and efficient use of the road network. No BILINGA, QLD Southport I volunteer in Southport area twice a week. As an aged person parking close to where I work parking is welcomed. Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor twice a week Submission supports proposed amending law No MERRIMAC, QLD The roll out of this parking precinct was far too widespread. I get there was concern during the Games and we didn't know how little the issue would be but we did not need it. This should have been changed a year ago, after the Games and the Gold Coast Health and delay has just left people feeling angry. We have never had anyone park in our street or the surrounding street to commute to the Health and Knowledge Precinct Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD The transportation can be improved working together with State/Federal. There needs to ne another transportation service provider and reduce the cost. We are suppose to use the public transport but the cost is too high. A transfer system ticket should be introduced whereby a single ticket could be used in all public transport rather than always paying every time we hop from tram to bus or vice versa 1. GC Health precinct need more car facilities with at least 5 hours free car park before charges. 2. Robina is a growing precinct and notice carpark space for spectators is limited and are parking in This submission does not relate directly to the residential proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback areas. Need provided will be considered during future parking Oppose Support Not answered Not applicable Yes - commuter signage. reviews. Public transport/access to No ROBINA, QLD Gold Coast Too many restricted parking areas already While this submission does not support all proposed Health and changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Knowledge and efficient use of the road network. Precinct Traffic Area, Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Area, Southern Traffic Area, Southport Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor Traffic Area No UPPER COOMERA, QLD Southern I think having permits will create revenue that can go back into our roads. For the people in residential areas, it is frustrating when you are trying to have people over but the street looks like a packed parking lot. TALLEBUDGERA VALLEY, Support Not applicable Support Not applicable Yes - commuter Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No QLD Robina Stadium (event) traffic area Not applicable Support Not applicable Not applicable Yes - other Makes sense to expand traffic area slightly as everybody parks in the 2 proposed streets due to restrictions in the otehr streets Submission supports proposed amending law No ROBINA, QLD Southport Robina I believe the proposals will streamline and improve parking / traffic flows in the areas targeted. Robina Stadium has always had traffic issues , this may help solve them. Business Stadium Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor District Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No MERMAID BEACH, QLD southport and . Gold Coast health Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter preceinct Submission supports proposed amending law No PARADISE WATERS, QLD I am a RATE PAYER of , Parkwood, and I have in the past written several emails to Division 6 - Dawn Crichlow regarding this issue. There was NO need to zone so far out from the GC University Hospital in the first place, and Dawn Crichlow agreed and put this in writing to me. Absolute madness, how there are parking restrictions within the suburb of Parkwood! Prior to the thousand of signs that were erected, there were never any parking issues, and this trend continues; ZERO parking issues!!! The person who signed off on erecting thousands of the parking signs within suburban neighbourhoods, needs to be SACKED immediately for using MY rate payer monies for this purpose...how did much did these signs cost anyways??? This has purely been all about revenue raising...the Parking and Traffic Scheme Department need to be SACKED for their GROSS mistake of zoning to FAR OUT!!! Also...I was posted step by step directions for how to apply online to renew these dam parking permits, and guess what the step by step directions didn't work. This meant I had to phone the Parking and Traffic Scheme Department to organise this, and their comment was "oh yes this procedure isn't working for some residents; we don't know why". I can tell you WHY...it's due to incompetent IT Department who over the course of this debacle, I've had to phone on several occasions to organise the permit; the first year we required This submission supports implementation of proposed Gold Coast Health and permits, last year and know doubt this year the online processing will be a stuffed again!!! GET RID OF THE PARKING RESTRICTIONS IN THE SUBURB OF PARKWOOD!!!! changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area directly or indirectly impact this person. Unhappy PARKWOOD, QLD We would prefer cameras rather than permit signs. There are too many goons hooning our neighbourhood and getting away with it. We need cameras to get their number plates or us them, permit signs are useless and wasting our money. This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback provided will be considered during future parking Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Yes - commuter Southport Robina reviews. QPS No SOUTHPORT PARK, QLD I am a short term visitor to all of the areas. My use of suitable public transport to visit these areas is not readily available; it is time consuming and is inconvenient. Submission supports proposed amending law. This submission has raised an issue that Council is not able All the traffic to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is not Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor areas listed under Local Government control. Public transport/access to No ELANORA, QLD Any parking problems were caused by the planning dept Development No dwelling business or any type of building should not have got approval without adaquate off street free parking. Being provided in the plans ie Suncorp arena Robina should have included a free parking space per every 3 people so 40000 capacity 13,333 spaces free same goes for shopping centers and houses and especially blocks of apartments 1 double room 2 spaces ie 3 bed needs 4 spaces min parking restrictions ie yellow lines should only be used in places where it’s dangerous to park . The hospital spt the car park should be free for all staff or it should not have been built it’s all paid for by our taxes we have paid I believe the car park is privately owned I smell corruption you do not need parking restrictions This submission has raised an issue that Council is not you need to build the correct facillities in the first place short sighted idiotic planners think of all the salaries saved including whoever designed this consultation your not needed able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is Oppose Not answered Oppose Oppose Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Spt GCh Robina under State Government control. No BIGGERA WATERS, QLD Gold Coast Health & Knowledge It was ridiculous that was ever included in the GC Health & Knowledge traffic precinct. I am pleased the area is being reduced. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Precinct concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Southport, Southport Robina Support Support Not applicable Support Yes - visitor Robina Submission supports proposed amending law No MUDGEERABA, QLD Park is already very limited in this area. While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Support Yes - resident Robina and efficient use of the road network. No MUDGEERABA, QLD No comments on these proposed changes to Traffic Areas This submission does not relate directly to the Traffic signals Council should also be focussing with great urgency on improving traffic flow on major roads in the Gold Coast via electronic coordination of traffic signalling equipment at intersections proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback provided will be directed to the relevant section for their Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable consideration. No BROADBEACH, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 135 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Southern and gold coast Robina and health and Southport knowledge Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport traffic area traffic areas traffic areas. Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD We don’t want more fees, rules and red tape While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - resident Southern and efficient use of the road network. No CURRUMBIN DC, QLD This just appears to be another grab of cash for council. I dont see why parking should 1. be regulated to time or 2. have to pay for parking on the street (if applicable), especially in areas where people shop or go to the beach. We already pay While this submission does not support all proposed rates, car rego etc. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Support Oppose Support Oppose Yes - commuter Southport and efficient use of the road network. No CARRARA, QLD Health & There is ample parking spaces available in this area now with the recent opening of the old commonwealth village site streets. There is no need to reduce any limits at this time! Knowledge This submission supports retaining existing parking Oppose Support Support Oppose Yes - commuter Precinct restrictions. Leave as is. No NERANG, QLD Health Further restriction to parking in the health precince and during stadium events is detrimental to those working in the areas concerned While this submission does not support all proposed precinct and changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Robina and efficient use of the road network. Oppose Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Stadium No MERMAID BEACH, QLD Everything is working now, why change it This submission supports retaining existing parking Leave as is. Support Oppose Oppose Not applicable Yes - resident Resident @ robina restrictions. No ROBINA, QLD I don't believe there is a need for the Gold Coast Health & Knowledge Traffic Area to extend past Henry Cotton Drive, Parkwood as there are no student/s or hospital visitors who park that far from the actual hospital and university area. The Submission supports proposed amending law. Gold Coast Health and streets behind the Parkwood Tavern, to the end of Henry Cotton Drive should be the only streets and houses to be covered by this proposed change of the current Traffic Area. Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No PARKWOOD, QLD Gold Coast Not everyone can afford to pay for parking at the hospital. If you are sick the last thing you want to do is catch public transport not to mention that the parking at Helensvale station in none. Again to go to southport to pay for parking is not always While this submission does not support all proposed Health and the way to go. With the new changes happening to public transport with the go card being discontinued I do not have a smart phone or watch and I do not have a tap and go card which means I will have to pay more for a paper ticket so I will not changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Knowledge be catching public transport again. Please leave the parking alone as their is not enough. The council should of though of this when they sold the parking at the hospital and they should of built the parking up at the tram and train station's as there and efficient use of the road network. Precinct and is not enough at them and people are forced to park along the streets. Southport Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor Traffic Area Public transport/access to No OXENFORD, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Robina Stadium Traffic Area I think the proposed changes to the Robina Stadium traffic area is a step forward. Submission supports proposed amending law No ROBINA, QLD 1 GC health 1 leave as is and 2 Robina 2 leave as is This submission supports retaining existing parking Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor stadium restrictions. Leave as is. No ORMEAU, QLD Gold Coast Gold Coast All traffic areas .... please don't change anything its fine as it is. Health, Health, Robina Robina Stadium, Stadium, southern southern traffic area, traffic area, Southport Southport This submission supports retaining existing parking Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter Yes - visitor traffic area traffic area restrictions. Leave as is. No BONOGIN, QLD There is no need for a 2hr parking limit past henry cotton dve i live in and none of my neighbours want timed parking either Submission supports proposed amending law. God coast health and knowledge Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident precinct parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No PARKWOOD, QLD . I am a rate payer and would like to know how my funds are spent. I would also like to understand how parking is keeping people safe and areas accessible at Support Support Support Support Yes - other the same time. Submission supports proposed amending law No MERRIMAC, QLD I am a resident just off . Daily, employees from Harvest court, Ferry Road Markets and the Industrial estates surrounding my home park in my street - 5 days per week, 8 hours of the day. I work from home and often no visitors can park in front of my house, my bins occasionally don't get collected due to cars being parked along the available curbs, and my area is constantly disturbed because employers don't provide adequate parking for their staff. People park dangerously close to the Elaine Street Joan Street corner making driving dangerous. I've seen trucks get stuck, garbage trucks get stuck, and almost two accidents recently because it narrows the street to one lane available driving space and not everyone is driving to the speed limits. If council reduce permit parking areas in broader Southport, you invite commercially orientated traffic and parking back into the low density residential neighbourhoods which is already occurring in my own street because I live on a fringe street directly affected by the businesses and highrises council are approving in my area. I would personally like Joan and Elaine Streets added to the traffic area to stop people parking here all day, as council have done with sections of Minnie, Graham and Percy Streets due to easy access from Harvest Court into Joan street via the Joan Street Park and walkway. We understand Minnie Street is not a low density residential zone, but it is adjacent to other quiet surround streets. There is about to be an influx of additional residents due to the few multi-residential buildings nows occurring, and this will also impact flow on parking into the streets surrounding this area. I have already had multiple arguments While this submission does not support the proposed with inconsiderate people parking at my front door for days on end, disrupting deliveries and my quiet access. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area and efficient use of the road network. Extend Traffic Area SOUTHPORT, QLD These areas do not affect me SURFERS PARADISE, Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable No objection recorded No QLD Southport - There is limited parking for staff on the side streets and we often finish work in the dark and there is a long, unsafe walk back to the car. Health HELENSVALE TOWN Support Support Not applicable Support Yes - commuter precinct Submission supports proposed amending law Safety concerns walking to car after work No CENTRE, QLD Robina What would be good is if for the Stadium events if you could just hop on one of the 'normal' buses with your Titans pass without having to pay as opposed to travelling to the bus station. Stadium This submission supports implementation of proposed (Event) Traffic changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Support Support Yes - visitor Area directly or indirectly impact this person. Public transport/access to No MUDGEERABA, QLD Health and Robina N/A Knowledge Stadium, Support Support Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Precinct Southport Submission supports proposed amending law No MUDGEERABA, QLD Southport & great news that the areas are reduced, allowing visitors to park out side homes they are visiting without restriction. Could consider "Tow away after 72hrs " in the reduced areas. Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - visitor Hospital Submission supports proposed amending law Enforcement No BIGGERA WATERS, QLD Southern Are allowances made for beach access on Bilinga beach? Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law Communicate to customer No CURRUMBIN, QLD Gold Coast Health and As above Submission supports proposed amending law. Knowledge precinct ie. Feedback provided will be considered during future Parkwood. We are in a quiet parking reviews. residential street which does not Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident need 2 hour parking limits Reduce/remove Traffic Area No PARKWOOD, QLD Larger area means easier commute This submission supports implementation of proposed Southern changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Oppose Support Support Support Yes - commuter traffic area directly or indirectly impact this person. No MIAMI, QLD Health I do not understand what needs to be inserted here. On a side note, this is the most complex survey Ive ever seen from GCCC. Precinct, Southport, Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - visitor Southern Submission supports proposed amending law Feedback for Corporate Communications No MAIN BEACH, QLD Gold Coast The parking areas are currently far too large Reduce/remove Traffic Area Health and Knowledge Southern & This submission supports implementation of proposed Precinct Southport changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Oppose Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Traffic Area Traffic Area directly or indirectly impact this person. No ISLE OF CAPRI, QLD If you are not a resident of the area how are you ever to know if you are within an event. People will not park on the other side of Robina town Centre to attend an event at Skilled.. it is too far to walk so why would this ever be considered for While this submission does not support the proposed expansion. Why don't you have a CAR PARK like every other city so you can attend an event and park. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not answered Oppose Not answered Not answered Yes - visitor Robina and efficient use of the road network. Reduce/remove Traffic Area VARSITY LAKES, QLD Gold Coast Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct. Parking costs are exorbitant, free spaces are non-existant, and limited restricted parking spaces too few and too restrictive to allow for business, activities, visitations and operations to be conducted Health and with any effect. Knowledge Precinct and Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Southport Submission supports proposed amending law Paid parking No LABRADOR, QLD There is far too much restricted parking as it is! If it ain't broke - don't fix it!!! This submission supports retaining existing parking Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter All of them restrictions. Leave as is. No RUNAWAY BAY, QLD Parking already too restrictive. While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Support Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Robina and efficient use of the road network. No ROBINA, QLD GC health Please remove all 2 hour limits around Gold coast University Hospital. I myself as a employee of GCUH find it very hard to find parking without breaching the time limit. I live in Pimpama so no train options for me. Removing the 2 hour limit will Submission supports proposed amending law. and GC health and make so many people's life a lot easier. Now that CW Games are over, these timi restrictions around GCUH aren't serving any purpose. Feedback provided will be considered during future knowledge knowledge parking reviews. Support Support Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor precinct precinct State/Private parking issue No PIMPAMA, QLD Within the last six months, the street I live on, in Southport, has been made a 2 hour parking zone. Why this has occurred is completely unbeknownst to me, as the street isn't directly connected to a major road. I can't even park in front While this submission does not support all proposed of my own house without a permit, and was fined shortly after the new signs went up. Why are you making parking for residents so difficult? The street I live on is not high traffic and only the residents of the street use it most of the time. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not answered Not answered Oppose Not answered Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area and efficient use of the road network. SOUTHPORT, QLD Southport Southport high school Submission supports proposed amending law Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter High School Teachers have no safe parking State parking issue No HOLLYWELL, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 136 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Q4 (Please Q2 (Do the specify Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q2 (Do the changes to the which of Q5 (Please support the support the support the support the changes to the Traffic Areas the above specify proposed proposed proposed proposed Traffic Areas affect you Q2 (Do the changes Q2 (Do the listed which of amendments to the amendments to amendments to amendments affect you because: ) you to the Traffic Areas changes to the Traffic the above Traffic Areas?) the Traffic the Traffic to the Traffic because: ) you are a commuter affect you because: Traffic Areas Q3 (Please specify which Area (s) listed Q6 (If Gold Coast Health Areas?) Robina Areas?) Areas?) are a resident to one or more ) you are a visitor to affect you of the above listed Traffic you are a Traffic Area other, and Knowledge Stadium (Event) Southern Southport in one of these of these Traffic one or more of because: ) Areas you are a resident commuter (s) you are please Q7 (Please ensure your comments relate to Traffic Areas listed only for this submission and are supported by the grounds (reasons for your submission) and the facts and circumstances (the Changes Precinct Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Areas Areas these Traffic Areas other. of) to) a visitor to) specify) evidence for your reasons). (Please indicate which Traffic Area (s) your submission refers to.)) Submission Consideration by City Officers Brief overview Recommended Q10 (Suburb) I think its Gold coast health precinct SHOCKING THAT HEALTH CARE WORKERS are not supported by Gold Coast council but bleeded on on by parking vampires support health workers!!!!!! Modern city This submission has raised an issue that Council is not with dinosaur able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is Oppose Support Oppose Support Yes - commuter thinking!!! under State Government control. No MOLENDINAR, QLD Work in one of Southport these traffic To have the 2hr limit removed will benefit business in the chirn park area as staff will have more options for parking and not using parks that benefit customers Submission supports proposed amending law - Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - other areas concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No MAUDSLAND, QLD . This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Oppose Support Yes - commuter Southport directly or indirectly impact this person. No VARSITY LAKES, QLD Southport Traffic Area - My property address is , Southport. A small freehold lot with a detached house. Proposed Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019. Grounds and Circumstance – Detached premises resident parking permit provision: The amendment proposes that for a resident in a detached premise that a resident parking permit may only be granted where “the detached premises have a kerb side frontage of more than 6m” – Part 4 Section 11 Cl 11 (a) (iv) As the owner for the lot , Southport, 4215. I will be directly impacted by changes to this particular reference Presently, I have two Residential Car Parking Permits for my new house, and I have bought into my property on the basis I could obtain such permits on an ongoing basis, allowing me to continue to have on street parking. Although my home, which I consider a Detached Dwelling, may only have a 4.5m frontage, house, I rely on my street parking for my job and for my general day to day activities, as I have no parking onsite. I particularly find it disheartening that, if the project, that I have bought into, had a body corporate, I would still be able to access the parking permits I have now if the new legislation were to be adopted. It is both frustrating and ironic that you have applied this “6m” rule to make it easier for us to confirm eligibility. My home has its own residential lot and I have a detached home on it. Worst of all, if my home was not a detached house, i.e. had a body corporate, it would still be entitled 2 resident parking permits and 2 visitor permits, equal to my current entitlement. This is because if I was applying for a ‘’multi-residential premises” Parking Permit, my house would form ”…part or the whole of a lot in a community titles scheme —the scheme land for the community titles scheme has a kerb side frontage of more than 6m. You are in discriminating one type of land tenure from another without any other physical difference, and in so doing, you are discriminating from one owner to another. A body corporate is allowed all these parking permits, but I am not even allowed one? The impact of this amendment will be devastating in my personal case. Firstly, since the purchase of my home, I have had to undergo foot surgery due to an accident, and I can only walk short distances without having pain. This situation is not unique to me, as many home owners have different mobility challenges throughout their lives, and to be forced to give up my car, or to park it in a remote storage location (if one is even available) would represent a severe impost. Further, the value of my property will drop, and, as a first home buyer, my life savings and net worth is tied to this property, and it would be a severe impact on the progress I have made in the past 10 years. It would also be an embarrassing assault on housing affordability made by a Council whose budget is in the billions. There would only be a handful of detached houses that have less than 6m in width, and one size doesn’t not fit all, so the impact and improvement to carparking because of this specific rule of eligibility would be insignificant to overall street parking outcomes, but have a devastating impact on those who are affected. Can you please relook at the reference to 6m frontage detached housing and consider: 1. Amending it so that detached houses that have no off-street parking are exempt from the 6m frontage eligibility requirement, and can apply for car parking permits. 2. Reduce the any restrictions on detached housing, so that all detached houses are eligible for at least one car parking permit. 3. Decrease number of potential existing permits by reducing the number of paid Visitor Parking Permits available to each eligible person from the current two permits to just one, a maximum of off-street parking. 4. Grandfather existing properties that were eligible for parking permits under the existing legislation. Effectively, the number of detached houses on the Gold Coast that have no off-street car parking facilities would be an extremely small percentage of the overall population, and the number of those houses that have less than a 6m kerb frontage would even further reduce the percentage of overall cars on the street that this legislation will have an impact on. However, almost all the residents that will be impacted will be those that are already struggling with issues of housing affordability. Overall, this specific clause would effect so few people, but the effect on those few people would be devastating to their lifestyle ¬ not just a minor tweak - ¬ as it would mean it would be impossible to own and park a car. Please reconsider. While this submission does not support the proposed Yours Faithfully, changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Yes - resident Yes - commuter SOUTHPORT SOUTHPORT and efficient use of the road network. Parking permit criteria SOUTHPORT, QLD Health Health precinct precinct. It’s nearly unaffordable going to the This submission has raised an issue that Council is not hospital due to able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is BROADBEACH WATERS, Oppose Not applicable Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor parking fees under State Government control. University Hospital No QLD All at varying I am in so much favour of the proposed reduced back Traffic Parking Area in particular the Southport Traffic Area. As this is where I choose to park my vehicle with cumbersome Spoting Equipment and do Water Sport recreation of many hours times at a time throughout weekdays and weekends. Since the expanded area was introduced, it was an absolute nightmare trying to avoid Parking Patrol Officers attempting to fine me for overstaying the limit that was psychologically, negatively throughout the effecting me from the enjoyment of my recreational sport activity, which is so important to me as I am a sufferer of severe depression and mental anxiety disorders and my sporting recreational activity is one of the very few things that helps me to year but cope and feel a little bit better about myself. mainly the Southport Traffic Area throughout many weekdays in SURFERS PARADISE, Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor the year Submission supports proposed amending law No QLD Southern Traffic area. My unit block ( Bilinga) and one of the oldest unit buildings in the area, contains units and thus under the current criteria I am ineligible for a visitor parking permit. Only a third of the unit owners have This submission does not relate directly to the their unit as their principal place of residence, but because of an arbitrary ruling of 20 units many elderly residents are unable to have visitors stay. If Council was to assess eligibility based on principal place of residence status, proof supplied by proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback way of the ATO, only a small proportion of residents would apply and is likely to be much fairer. These onerous restrictions have only come into being since the airport car parking facility was expanded. provided will be considered during future parking Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Not answered Yes - resident Bilinga reviews. BILINGA, QLD We do not need 2 minute parking restrictions in . I have been a resident for 16 years and we gave NEVER had a problem with people parking in our street to walk to Cbus stadium..... EVER!!!!!! Its simply revenue raising in my While this submission does not support all proposed opinion! changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not answered Oppose Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Robina and efficient use of the road network. Remove my street from Traffic Area No ROBINA, QLD Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area I live in Labrador and barely any cars park in our street. The only people who park here are residents and their visitors. There is no need to have Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident this Street on 2 hour parking. concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Our street is empty at all times , so the fact of having a 2 hours parking limits it is a just and nothing else a way to catch an occasional visitor that takes a bit longer to drink a cup of tea after a funeral ceremony.We have already a 2 hrs parking While this submission does not support all proposed Gold Coast Health e knowledge limit and what a waste of money! Signs changed twice! Attention should be given instead to other problems like noise from the swimming pool in the Titans training centre! Parkwood . changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Precint and efficient use of the road network. Remove my street from Traffic Area No PARKWOOD, QLD These areas already have limited parking and the fees charged are unreasonable This submission supports implementation of proposed GCH and changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Robina Robina Southern directly or indirectly impact this person. Paid parking No ROBINA, QLD The time limits were only introduced for the Commonwealth games and should have been removed when it was over. If the parking limits were to stay residents should be supplied a pass for street parking without payment. While this submission does not support all proposed Free permits changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - resident Labrador and efficient use of the road network. No LABRADOR, QLD Gold Coast Further restrictions and resident permits is not necessary and is only incurring further costs to ratepayers and inconvenience to existing owners and tenants. If Council imposed sufficient parking space requirements on developers of new While this submission does not support all proposed Health and developments being approved for commercial space and high density housing in these zones, then the residents and commuters would not need to park on the streets. Many commercial tenants will take a lease on a space and only have two changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Knowledge Southport allocated parking spaces, but 20+ staff forcing their staff to park ad hoc whereever they can in the locale. In addition, there is a lack of parking provisions being provided at light rail and heavy rail stations which is discouraging many city and efficient use of the road network. Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Area Precinct Traffic Area residents from using public transport. If you are too far to walk to a station and there is no parking, then how can you use public transport. Development No ROBINA, QLD 2 min parking is ridiculous While this submission does not support all proposed Robina changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not answered Oppose Not answered Not answered Yes - visitor stadium area and efficient use of the road network. No ROBINA, QLD Southport Leave parking as is as I do water sports and will be out in water for long time can't keep coming into shore to move car This submission supports retaining existing parking Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - visitor traffic restrictions. Leave as is. No MULLUMBIMBY, NSW Parking Restrictions in Parkwood are completely unnecessary. They discourage the use of the tram and are a nuisance for Resident and Visitor parking permits. Submission supports proposed amending law. Feedback provided will be considered during future Southport Restrictions impact my ability to enjoy my water sport activities on the Broadwater as there is not enough time to get out and have time on the water and then pack up and get back within the allocated time. parking reviews. Southport Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor PARKWOOD Traffic Area Please remove them both! Reduce/remove Traffic Area No PARKWOOD, QLD Southport Southport has no more people since the trams and the creation of the new road directions means you park further away, walk further and the 2 or 1 hour limit are too short. Even in the residential street past Southport , Chirn park are 2 hour limits several times Southern area which is crazy. There are no businesses that are affected just friends and visitors to residents. a Week and eg. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor at night Coolangatta concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Robina Stadium Robina Stadium Submission supports proposed amending law No ROBINA, QLD I support the changes as there is no overflow of traffic in this area- there is no weekday parking problem as everyone works in this health and knowledge area. It become hard to have visitors come to stay and there is no where for them to park Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident GC Health & knowledge without risking a ticket while parking curbside concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD I commute I beleive the restrictions need to more laxed. Not only do the public pay for fuel tax, rego tax and everyday working tax they are getting hit with parking fees on roads they already pay for. within This submission supports implementation of proposed Southport and changes with the exception of a specific issue that may SURFERS PARADISE, Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - commuter Robina directly or indirectly impact this person. Paid parking No QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 137 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Chirn Park State parking issue No CHIRN PARK, QLD Robina shopping area While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter Hospital and efficient use of the road network. No WORONGARY, QLD I live in a unit complex on where in 2017 a 2-hour parking limit was introduced.

Prior to the parking limit introduction, the streets in this area (Johnston St, King St, Beattie St, Locke St) were filled with cars belonging to employees of local businesses (along Johnston St and adjacent areas, as well as the car dealerships on Ferry Rd) and staff of the Southport High School which is across the road on Smith St.

The streets here are very narrow with a lot of tight, blind corners, so the risk of collision between vehicles is quite high. The end of Beattie Street has a one-way access from Smith Street, and many times per day you will find cars blindly following GPS getting stuck trying to get onto Smith Street and needing to perform a U-turn to follow the correct route. It is in my opinion that maintaining the parking limit in this area has a great effect on alleviating risk from the problems that arise here.

Another factor to consider is that during school hours, dozens of students from the Southport High School and St Hilda’s school use these streets to walk to and from school. There is a pedestrian crossing on Smith Street that feeds into Locke and Beattie Streets, as well as a crossing about 100m further up that feeds into Beale Street, and these areas are filled with pedestrians in the mornings and afternoons. Introducing more cars into the area would increase the risk of collision with pedestrians, especially those who are not used to having lots of traffic in the quieter residential areas.

I strongly urge the City Council to maintain the current parking restrictions in this area. This submission supports retaining existing parking Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Yes - resident Southport restrictions. Safety concerns SOUTHPORT, QLD I support the reduction in the traffic area around the GC health and knowledge precinct. Parking around the University and hospital would be further eased if there were more buses and more routes to bring commuters in. Please review the I am a buses too. resident in 4216 and I work at the university on Parklands drive. I agree the reduction is sensible and will ease parking on the campus. More importantly I use public transport and would like to Submission supports proposed amending law. This see MORE submission has raised an issue that Council is not able BUSES and a to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is not Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - commuter routes. under Local Government control. Public transport/access to No BIGGERA WATERS, QLD Keep Rainbow Bay free for local residents both permanant and local holiday makers This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback provided will be considered during future parking Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Yes - visitor Rainbow Bay reviews. No COOLANGATTA, QLD The areas around my home are all residential and never have business parking in the street. Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Southport and I support the updated maps and believe they should be enacted as soon as possible. Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - visitor GCHKP Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD I do not support the proposed change in traffic ara because I do not believe it goes far enough. As I understand it, the area was expanded as part of the Commonwealth Games. I belive now that the games are over the are should be reduced. If While this submission does not support all proposed the area was to stay, I believe that further efforts need to be made to improve public transport and pedestrian crossings to encourage residents to reduce the number of cars. changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not answered Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area and efficient use of the road network. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT, QLD gold coast gold coast gold coast at present it just seems to be making other areas busy health & health & health & knowledge knowledge knowledge Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Yes - other precinct precinct precinct Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD I live on and am annoyed that friends visiting my home can’t park for more than 2 hours. I am 3km or 39 minute walk from the uni and hospital and the parking limitation doesn’t affect commuters - no one ever parked and walked or Gold Coast Health and bussed from there anyway! Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD In regards to the Southport Traffic Area, as someone who lives in the existing area, I would like to see this reduced. It makes shopping at local shops difficult, dining out difficult and having friends and family difficult. As a result, I have almost completely stopped shopping at the local boutiques and choose to meet friends and family at locations such as Pacific Fair because they have 5-hour free parking. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area I would also like to be able to have my friends and family visit me more, without having to worry about moving their cars all the time! concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD There were absolutely no problems parking in my area in Southport beforehand and it just made my life much more difficult. I was also affected by the southern traffic area that made parking near the airport very hard and was obviously a tactic to get people to park in the very expensive GC airport parking. It never really affected anyone parking along the bus route next to the GC highway, and no one is using the plenty of parking available there after the fixing of the parking spots. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport Southport Southern concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Southport Parkwood I have to park on the street at my house and if the boss picks me up my car is left all day in a 2hr zone outside my house (Southport). But if I drive to work/ bosses house my car is in a 2 hr zone as well (Parkwood) Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD These restrictions are rediculous and should have been removed straight after the comm games finished. I am on the body corporate of a large high rise building and most residents are sick and tired this money grab by the council Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Labrador Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Health and Parking at Griffith and the Hospitals is already very difficult whether it be pricing or availability... changing the zoning would allow me to park a shorter distance away and walk the rest. Submission supports proposed amending law Knowledge Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Precinct Southport State parking issue No COOMBABAH, QLD We have a mini bus parked at our residence as it’s needed for on call work and we are receiving parking fines This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback provided will be considered during future parking Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Southport reviews. No SOUTHPORT, QLD I live in the Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area ( ) and have been living here for the past 10 years. During this period, there has been no need for the 2P restriction. The installation of the signs before the Submission supports proposed amending law. Comm Games was a joke and a waste of time and money. I'd be happy to see these signs removed permanently as no one working at the hospital or the University would want to walk the distance. Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Parkwood parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No PARKWOOD, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Health precinct I've been fined for visiting my mother who has lived in the same house for 20 years Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Labrador Southport Support Not answered Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Labrador southport Southport Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Gold health and knowledge I'm in Gold Health and Knowledge and not impacted. Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident precinct Submission supports proposed amending law No PARKWOOD, QLD I live in the Southport 2H parking area of Chirn Park. There is no reason for this area to be 2H parking as it only affects residents and their guests. We have never had an issue with people filling up our street with parked cars all day long so it Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport should just go back to the way it was. concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Labrador has never had any issues with parking including before and after the commonwealth games. It is used by residents mostly and I think should be excluded from the 2 hour zone. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident Southport traffic area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD The imposed two hr parking in my area serves no purpose but to disrupt the local community. It is only the residents and their visitors that park here, remove! Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident , Chirn Park concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Health and knowledge: I live on and I think this is very far from the hospital, it’s difficult not being about to park my car on the street if all the car parks in my complex are taken.

Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Gold Coast health and knowledge Southport Southport: I visit here 2 days a week for a course and I can never drive my car in because it is too expensive to park due to 2P on the street, so I walk and catch public transport instead Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 138 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Q4 (Please Q2 (Do the specify Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q2 (Do the changes to the which of Q5 (Please support the support the support the support the changes to the Traffic Areas the above specify proposed proposed proposed proposed Traffic Areas affect you Q2 (Do the changes Q2 (Do the listed which of amendments to the amendments to amendments to amendments affect you because: ) you to the Traffic Areas changes to the Traffic the above Traffic Areas?) the Traffic the Traffic to the Traffic because: ) you are a commuter affect you because: Traffic Areas Q3 (Please specify which Area (s) listed Q6 (If Gold Coast Health Areas?) Robina Areas?) Areas?) are a resident to one or more ) you are a visitor to affect you of the above listed Traffic you are a Traffic Area other, and Knowledge Stadium (Event) Southern Southport in one of these of these Traffic one or more of because: ) Areas you are a resident commuter (s) you are please Q7 (Please ensure your comments relate to Traffic Areas listed only for this submission and are supported by the grounds (reasons for your submission) and the facts and circumstances (the Changes Precinct Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Areas Areas these Traffic Areas other. of) to) a visitor to) specify) evidence for your reasons). (Please indicate which Traffic Area (s) your submission refers to.)) Submission Consideration by City Officers Brief overview Recommended Q10 (Suburb) I find the Southport CBD parking too excessive on my low wage so freeing up some parking would be great plus I like the excercise that I am a resident in the area and I get when I find it inconvenient for my visitors am able to Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - commuter who cone to stay, walk Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Southport and Remove the two hour limits! Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Southport and Robina Robina concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD I go to SSHS and cannot park anywhere besides on ground as the 2P applies Submission supports proposed amending law Support Support Support Support Yes - visitor School parking State parking issue No NERANG, QLD Gold coast health and knowledge precinct, I agree with the proposed changes with the exception of the inclusion of Olsen Ave to the Central St intersection. Needs to be removed to allow commuters an opportunity to park and ride. Submission supports proposed amending law. Gold coast health and knowledge Southport Southport Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor precinct. traffic area traffic area parking reviews. State parking issue No LABRADOR, QLD Southport Southport Absolutely impossible to get a park Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Labrador Robina Robina Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Submission supports proposed amending law - Not applicable Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD There is simply no need for limited time parking in this purely residential area. Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter Southport I work in the Southport area and happy to walk to work if the 2P area was smaller Submission supports proposed amending law No WEST BURLEIGH, QLD The traffic restrictions on residential streets within Southport/Labrador are unnecessary and negatively impact both residents and local businesses. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Southport traffic area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Disagree with any parking restrictions beyond woody view way moving away from stadium. The current restrictions are draconian and prevent residents from parking beside parks to use them on event days. Visitors to houses off thorngate dr have the potential to be fined on game days for parking greater than 2 minutes. Ridiculous bylaws This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - resident Robina stadium area directly or indirectly impact this person. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No ROBINA, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident I support the change Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD I frequent Southport parking area affects me and my family greatly as we have children that are starting to drive and have additional cars and the locality of our house being down a laneway is limiting our ability to park on our property and the shared Chirn park in driveway. We are embarking on renovations which will see us have no parking for any cars at our property for 3 months and I am now required to plead with council for leniency on the resident permits to be issued. Likewise the trades that will be the Southport employed will be disadvantaged by the limited parking. These parking restrictions are not necessary in the wider community as the parking of commuters/visitors to chirn park does not spread to the neighbouring streets and definitely not impact parking area our street. Not sure why these parking restrictions were necessary in the first place. Please make the proposed amendments to reduce the restricted parking areas. I am a resident of the Southport and also my traffic area who will be embarking I am a Griffith child goes to on renovations and parking on uni student Southport high the street is required but unable who and on to have enough permits, when I commutes to occasion will have visitors to my house it is an the knowledge visit for events issue as well due to being down a precinct on a that are longer Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor lane. regular basis. than 2 hrs concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport . Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD About time, I live in , nowhere near the light rail and any other area that needs 2 hour parking limits. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Health & Knowledge Precinct concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD I live on - during the no-show Commonwealth Games no one used the street for parking (I took daily photos of the abandoned street) and guess what - no ones uses it now! 2 hr restricted parking in this quiet residential street and Submission supports proposed amending law - Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport traffic area the surrounding area is an absolute joke and must be abolished. I can't believe that money was wasted introducing these restrictions in the first place with little chance for consultation. concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No CHIRN PARK, QLD Please lift the parking restrictions in Southport. This submission supports implementation of proposed Southport changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Not applicable Support Yes - commuter traffic area directly or indirectly impact this person. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT PARK, QLD The 2 hr parking limits stretch significantly further than required. Reducing them makes sense Gold Coast Health and Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area All others Submission supports proposed amending law No PARKWOOD, QLD I agree to lessening the area however it would be good if it could be lessened further towards GCUH down Government Rd as I used to park there for work and it was never busy but having it all the way out to Stephenson means I can't park for work and have to pay for parking instead when I'd prefer to park and walk. This submission supports implementation of proposed Health and changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Health and Knowledge Knowledge directly or indirectly impact this person. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No LABRADOR, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter Southport I support this Submission supports proposed amending law No RUNAWAY BAY, QLD GC Health and Knowledge In the GC Health and Knowledge precinct the parking boundaries are too wide. There was never a parking issue during the games or close to the Parkwood East station. These over extended boundaries affect everyday people just going about Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Precinct their daily lives. Please consider the new boundaries and reduce them ASAP! concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Boundaries go too far. No one is going to walk 2.5km to the hospital or tram station. Ridiculous. Submission supports proposed amending law. Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Health precinct Southport parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No ARUNDEL, QLD Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Health and knowledge Health and knowledge precinct Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Gold Coast Gold Coast health precinct, southern and southport traffic areas health precinct, southern and southport Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - commuter traffic areas Submission supports proposed amending law No PARADISE POINT, QLD For GC Health & Knowledge precinct the 2 hr parking extent is ridiculous reaching residential streets. I better idea would be to provide parking for the poor hospital staff and uni students. Submission supports proposed amending law. State/Private parking issue Again the Southport area is too wide spread. Affecting the parking for parents, volunteers and visitors at our primary school. Extent of these zones is way over and above what is required. Feedback raised an issue that Council is not able to Gold Coast Health and resolve as the responsibility for this matter is under Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Knowledge Precinct Southport State Government control. No ARUNDEL, QLD I am a resident of Labrador, and my daughter attends state school. The extended 2 hour parking zones impact our visitors to our house. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Health precinct Southport concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD We live in a unit complex with designated parking for one vehicle, when we purchased in the Chirn Park area we were able to park our 2nd vehicle on the street. We would not have purchased in the area if we were aware we would be unable to Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area park on the quiet suburban street. We applied but were not eligible for a permit. concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Southport traffic area The 2P laws are silly and unreasonable; quite frankly parking should be free at all times. Submission supports proposed amending law Paid parking No SOUTHPORT, QLD GC Health I did not support paid parking from the first instance. It’s just a money grab disgusting move. and Southport GC Health Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport and Robina Submission supports proposed amending law Paid parking No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport Southport 👍👍� Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD 2hr parking in a street which never had an issue to begin with. Restriction boundaries were a overzealous. Gold Coast Health and Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Southport Use public transport, stop using cars Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD Revised area is much more reasonable now that it doesn't wrap the whole way through Parkwood. This seemed unnecessary to begin with but the proposal seems much more logical. Gold Coast Health and Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No PARKWOOD, QLD Gold Coast The 2P area in Southport is very annoying for residents considering that the comm games have been over for a while now. health and Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Southport knowledge Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD Southport Traffic Area - resident on Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area concerns addressed with proposed changes No LABRADOR, QLD Gold Coast Health & Knowledge I reside in Parkwood and study in Southport so I am impacted by both traffic areas & feel the extent of both areas is unfair and unnecessary. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Precinct Southport concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD I live on in Labrador and while I was away in Nov 2018 for a death in the family, I got a parking ticket in front of my own house. These signs need to come down. Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Labrador concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD I would love for the 2p parking limits to be removed on residential streets in Southport - I have applied for a parking permit on my street and been denied - there’s no room in my garage or driveway as I live with housemates that also have cars. I Submission supports proposed amending law. would much like for these 2p limits to be removed. Feedback provided will be considered during future Not applicable Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Southport Southern parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT, QLD Unnecessary 2p parking Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Labrador concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD 2P parking isn’t required in my street Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD I live on Labrador, the 2P signs were put in place for the Commonwelth Games. This was totally unnecessary as during the games the traffic had not changed.If anything it was less. These signs create fear of receiving fines to the Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Labrador. residents who have no choice but to park their vehicles on the street. concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD Parkwood Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident parkwood concerns addressed with proposed changes No PARKWOOD, QLD Southport, labrador Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Labrador/chirn park concerns addressed with proposed changes No LABRADOR, QLD Gold Coast Southport Traffic area & Gold Coast Health & knowledge precinct Health & Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Southport Traffic Area Knowledge Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT BC, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Arundel Southport robina southport cbd and surrounding areas Submission supports proposed amending law No ARUNDEL, QLD I live and work in the We should not need a permit to park outside our home Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Labrador/Southport area Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Health and knowledge precinct The present parking restrictions extend too far into residential areas and are not necessary now the Games are over Submission supports proposed amending law No PARKWOOD, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 139 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

My work in childcare is in Nesbit Street Southport. Our staff require on street parking and need the surrounding streets to have the 2P zones omitted. Our daily salary is not enough to afford parking and our ratios don't allow us to move our Not answered Not answered Not answered Oppose Yes - other cars whenever No MOLENDINAR, QLD Gold Coast As a nurse the cost of parking to attend a shift is ridiculous. My mum is also elderly and has been a patient a few times this year and the cost of parking when you're a visitor to the hospital is even more ridiculous. Submission supports proposed amending law. Heath Feedback raised an issue that Council is not able to precinct, The 2 hour limits around Southport also make parking difficult when dining out. resolve as the responsibility for this matter is under Robina State Government control. stadium and Support Support Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Southport State parking issue No BIGGERA WATERS, QLD Our is a quiet residential street that would of no use for non Residents to park in... and a real Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Labrador Nuisance for visitors to our home concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD There can be absolutely no valid reason for limited parking in our street Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident chirn park concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Parking making it unavailable for everyone. I work in the hospital where parking itself is $17a day. What about patients who come in for chemo/dialysis where they have to stay for a full day?? Submission supports proposed amending law. They come in for a REQUIRED service for their own lives and are required to pay top dollar for parking as it’s a private owned. They can’t even park on the street as all of them are only two hours away. It is a rip off and making private owners Feedback raised an issue that Council is not able to richer while normal people like us suffer. It is preposterous and needs to stopped. resolve as the responsibility for this matter is under Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport Southport Southport State Government control. State parking issue No SOUTHPORT, QLD The previous areas are too large and unnecessary, particular the Southport one’s inclusion of Labrador areas, and around Chrin Park. Submission supports proposed amending law. Southport and Feedback provided will be considered during future Gold Coast parking reviews. Health and Knowledge Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Southport Precint Reduce/remove Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport Unnecessary restrictions Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Gold coast I think the parking restrictions in the gold coast health and kmowledge precint should be restricted or non existent. It is a safety issue having so many shift workers walking to and from their cars at all hours of the night. Submission supports proposed amending law. health and Feedback provided will be considered during future knowledge parking reviews. Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - commuter precinct area State/Private parking issue No PARADISE WATERS, QLD The 2 hour parking isn’t needed in our street. We live in and although we have the school at the end of the street, parking by the young ones doesn’t really affect our day to day lives during the school term Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No SOUTHPORT BC, QLD Southport traffic area - We have 3 cars, a boat and a trailer. We try to park them in our yard, but when moving them round, sometimes one vehicle must be left on the street. Copping a fine for that is ridiculous, given the amount of room there is to park on our street and Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident . the amount of traffic our street sees. Not to mention visitors parking for longer than 2hours. Friends and family who visit are having to either leave or move their car after the two hour period. Stupid. concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Labrador, Labrador, There does not seem to be any logical reason to have a two hour parking limit in suburban streets. It just is frustrating for all of the residents and must be a burden on the local council to issue and maintain permits. I see no benefit in having them. hospital and hospital and Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Resident of Labrador. Robina. robina concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD There is no need for parking management in this residential area, it just adds adminstrivia to life here and everyone would benefit it were scrapped. Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Support Not answered Yes - resident Southport concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD I had to park on our street where i live and its 2p parking which is ridiculous Submission supports proposed amending law. Southern end Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport Southport of gold coast parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT, QLD I own a I own a business in Chirn park and this has created significant difficulty for my staff to park. We do not have enough car parking spaces for our staff allocated by the building. This has resulted in staff either needing to move their car every 2 business in hours or receiving parking fines. Chirn park and this has created significant difficulty for my staff to Submission supports proposed amending law - Not applicable Not applicable Support Support Yes - other park concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No SOUTHPORT, QLD Health and knowledge Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Health and knowledge concerns addressed with proposed changes No LABRADOR, QLD I live on - it’s a nightmare! Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident concerns addressed with proposed changes No LABRADOR, QLD Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport traffic area I support the changes to Southport traffic area as I believe the area is to big and affects residents. Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD The extent of the 2P area is way too much Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Support Support Yes - resident Southport concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD All of them, All of them, dont be so stupid. While this submission does not support all proposed dont be so changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter stupid. and efficient use of the road network. No PACIFIC PINES, QLD Southport Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Southport Southport concerns addressed with proposed changes No SOUTHPORT, QLD Gold Coast Hospital & Dental Health visits ..either by Cab or VGC Patient Transport. Health and Knowledge Precinct Support Not answered Support Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Southport Traffic Area Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT BC, QLD Please change these 2P parking areas as they are just not needed where we live. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No SOUTHPORT, QLD We live here and have to give up our car spots when we have visitors and consequently need to park on the road. Submission supports proposed amending law - Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area concerns addressed with proposed changes No LABRADOR, QLD Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Health and knowledge precinct Southport Live on and it is no longer required a 2 hour parking. Work in Southport and it is hard enough finding a park let alone worrying about moving vehicle every 2 hours Submission supports proposed amending law No PARKWOOD, QLD I support the proposed reduction for the Gold Coast Health & Knowledge Precinct - it was unnecessary (was not even any parking issues in the area during the Comm Games) and caused a lot of issues with acquiring permits etc for residence. Submission supports proposed amending law. Feedback provided will be considered during future Where we live there is no need to have any regulated parking, as people are not prepared to walk that far to the Uni or Hospital. parking reviews.

The proposed reductions seem more reasonable. But the real problem would be to have a look at the parking situation in the area, why do people feel they need to park in these residential areas, this is because parking is too restricted in the area Gold Coast Health & Knowledge and too expensive (Hospital and Uni). I would suggest local government work with state government to fix this issue. Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Precinct State/Private parking issue No LABRADOR, QLD I have live in Labrador for some time including prior to the commonwealth games when the Southport 2P parking zone was extended to Central Street. The parking situation has not improved in the street I live since the parking I live with in the current Southport restrictions were implemented. The only thing it achieved was fining numerous residents for parking in their own street. The residents of the unit block I live in are not eligible to apply for resident parking permits as there are 22 units in our block. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident traffic area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD our street in Southport is so busy and always crowded it’s unecessary and could be avoided by reducing parking permits Submission supports proposed amending law. Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Southport area Parkwood area parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT BC, QLD Live in . No one other than residents and resident’s visitors park in this street. 2P parking not required. Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport traffic area. concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Southport Health . Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD The zones were too large and unnecessary previously, but these new zones are scaled back and while I still live within them I think they are more reasonable. Support Support Not answered Support Yes - resident Gold Coast health and knowledge Submission supports proposed amending law No ARUNDEL, QLD I live on a completely residential street - there is no need for a 2hr parking zone. We weren’t affected by anyone parking during the Comm games... we haven’t been told if we need new permits or not... Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Labrador concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD Southport - I Parking restrictions around Chirn park and Southport State High School have a negative impact on many families, residents and businesses, yet no positive impacts. Submission supports proposed amending law work at Southport State High Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Health and knowledge precinct - School State parking issue No PARKWOOD, QLD Support Not answered Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport GC Health Robina This has already taken way too long. Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter Labrador Happy with the changes Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD We have lived here for over 25 years and never have people parked in our street to either catch the tram or visit the hospital. Our street is a big street with lots of houses and the two hour parking is both an inconvenience for locals and their Submission supports proposed amending law. Gold Coast Health and Southport visitors and disruptive to our households because our own families can’t even park in front of our houses. Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Knowledge Precinct traffic area parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No PARKWOOD, QLD These areas were meant to be scaled back immediately after the GC games. It’s taken too long and needs to happen immediately. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Southport Traffic Area Southern Area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Southport The current parking is ridiculouand needs amending Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD Labrador & My son owns a duplex near Chirn Park & I regularly mind my grandchild & cannot Park on the street there- I am constantly moving my car as I cannot afford a permit Chirn Park & Health Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - visitor precincts concerns addressed with proposed changes No RUNAWAY BAY, QLD Southport, I love and work in all of the aforementioned areas. On the days I work I can be on multiple places and often find it difficult to park for as long as I need. Eg palm beach area only has a few all day parks which are taken by the tradesmen at 4am robina, leaving the workers having to move their cars every 2 hours which is very disruptive to the work day. We work with unemployed and with serious cases can’t just leave to move the car southern Gold Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Health precinct Coast Submission supports proposed amending law No PARKWOOD, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 140 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

I work at The GCU hospital and as a nurse I have to pay at least $1400 a year in parking or risk my life walking back to my car in the dark after 10 1/2 hour shifts. We as hospital staff deserve to park close to work and save on parking Support Support Support Support Yes - other and feel SAFE Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT PARK, QLD Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport 2 hour parking limit. It is ridiculous Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD As a unit owner of , Rainbow Bay, We and my adult children frequently have two vehicles at this property. As such all Unit owners should be provided at least one Parking Permit for off street parking per Unit. This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback provided will be considered during future parking Not applicable Not applicable Support Not applicable Yes - resident Southern Traffic Area reviews. Parking permit criteria No COOLANGATTA, QLD As a unit owner of , Rainbow Bay, We and my adult children frequently have two or more vehicles at this property. As such all Unit owners should be provided a Parking Permit for on-street parking. This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, feedback provided will be considered during future parking Not answered Not answered Support Not answered Yes - resident Southern Traffic Area reviews. Parking permit criteria No COOLANGATTA, QLD I am a resident on . There are plenty of on street parks available which only residents use. There is no need for two hour parking in this purely residential area which has a low density Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Southport traffic area concerns addressed with proposed changes No SOUTHPORT, QLD In the nearly 4 years I have lived in my street we have never had an issue with commuters, students or health workers parking their vehicles in the street. Will be good to have the resident and visitor permits removed for ease of parking our own Knowledge and Health vehicles or having friends/family visit without the hassle of a permit. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Precinct.... , Labrador concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD Gold Coast Health and I live here and it doesn’t require a 2 hour limit in my street Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Knowledge Area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Gold Coast Health and The street I live in doesn’t need 2 hour parking Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Knowledge Area concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD both areas for friends, family and work, very frustrating when you have to limit visits to people because you can't park outside their house for more than 2 hours Southport and health and knowledge Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - visitor precinct concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Chirn Park in particular needs the restrictions removed, and surrounding streets in Southport and Labrador. I live in Southport and understand the restrictions here, there are also adequate public transport and paid parking options. Submission supports proposed amending law. Chirn Park where I own a business has limited public transport and no pay for parking alternatives. Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport All All parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT, QLD I live in Chirn Park and live in the 2hr zone would like it removed and support the decision to do so as per the proposal Submission supports proposed amending law - Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident 4215 concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Our property will no longer be constrained by the changes Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Health precinct concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter Chirn Park There has been a noticeable decrease in business and foot traffic in the area Submission supports proposed amending law No ASHMORE, QLD Griffith Gold coast health and knowledge precinct and Southport Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Southport university Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT BC, QLD I live in the Gold Coast health precinct in . I think it was wrong to make our quiet street a 2P area as it is so far away from the tram stop. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Gold Coast health precinct concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Work in the area, want staff and clients to be able to park without worrying they will get fined Submission supports proposed amending law - Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Chirn Park concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No MERMAID BEACH, QLD I work in Chirn Park and have to park there. 2 hours is rediculous. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter concerns addressed with proposed changes No PACIFIC PINES, QLD Restricted parking is no longer needed for our street Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Southport Southport Submission supports proposed amending law No LABRADOR, QLD Since the Parkwood East has opened traffic and parking has not increased. I don’t see Uni students exploiting any changes to the nearby area and walking/catching the tram if the areas around were reduced. Ie parking on Arnold Palmer Drive. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident GC Health and Knowledge concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD I live in in parkwood, cant park at the front of my own house without getting a ticket. Submission supports proposed amending law. Live in the Gold Coast Health and Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Knowledge area parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No PARKWOOD, QLD It would be great if the restrictions were lifted in Chirn Park. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter CHIRN Park There is not enough parking for workers, and some of the streets are restricted on one side of the street which makes it very confusing. concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No COOMBABAH, QLD No need for 2 he parking in Labrador in residential streets Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD Many apartment complexes don't have many, if any, visitor parking spots, so the 2 hour street limit in the Southport Traffic Area can be a nuisance if visitors have to keep moving their vehicle. Limited resident spots and ineligibility for a parking Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area permit also impacts people living within the Southport Traffic Area. Submission supports proposed amending law Development No SOUTHPORT, QLD We live in a quiet cul de sac in Labrador in 2P zone. I understand during the Games as we live walking distance to the hockey, swimming, bowls and athletes village, however, during the games we didn't have any traffic issues as Labrador was Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Southport a ghost town concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD Support Not applicable Support Support Yes - resident Southport area resident Southport around Minnie street Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD Am v disappointed that GCCC took so long to abend the parking in Chirn Park to its pre Comm Games status. Had to purchase yet another visitor permit so the local mowing man could do the 5 houses in the street. Seriously it was a revenue raiser and am disappointed council couldn’t work faster. The Games went for 2 weeks and yet l had to purchase a permit for 2 years. Council is out of touch with local businesses and its residents. No-one other than residents or visitors to the Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Chirn Park residents ever parked in our street pre games, during the games or since. Perhaps the funds raised could go towards resealing which is now a patchwork of rubbish bitumen. concerns addressed with proposed changes No CHIRN PARK, QLD Chirn Park, Chirn Park - in favour of removal of parking restrictions in the village! Labrador: in favour of removing parking restrictions for Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - commuter the village! concerns addressed with proposed changes No HELENSVALE, QLD The 2h parking zones need to reduce Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Gold coast health and knowledge Southport All concerns addressed with proposed changes No LABRADOR, QLD Our street was empty since their introduction so it's a waste of time and money This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Support Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area directly or indirectly impact this person. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No LABRADOR, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 141 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Q4 (Please Q2 (Do the specify Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q1 (Do you Q2 (Do the changes to the which of Q5 (Please support the support the support the support the changes to the Traffic Areas the above specify proposed proposed proposed proposed Traffic Areas affect you Q2 (Do the changes Q2 (Do the listed which of amendments to the amendments to amendments to amendments affect you because: ) you to the Traffic Areas changes to the Traffic the above Traffic Areas?) the Traffic the Traffic to the Traffic because: ) you are a commuter affect you because: Traffic Areas Q3 (Please specify which Area (s) listed Q6 (If Gold Coast Health Areas?) Robina Areas?) Areas?) are a resident to one or more ) you are a visitor to affect you of the above listed Traffic you are a Traffic Area other, and Knowledge Stadium (Event) Southern Southport in one of these of these Traffic one or more of because: ) Areas you are a resident commuter (s) you are please Q7 (Please ensure your comments relate to Traffic Areas listed only for this submission and are supported by the grounds (reasons for your submission) and the facts and circumstances (the Changes Precinct Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Area Traffic Areas Areas these Traffic Areas other. of) to) a visitor to) specify) evidence for your reasons). (Please indicate which Traffic Area (s) your submission refers to.)) Submission Consideration by City Officers Brief overview Recommended Q10 (Suburb) I live in Southport, . And I can’t even park outside my own home without risk of getting a parking fine. Ridiculous Submission supports proposed amending law. Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Southport parking reviews. Remove my street from Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT, QLD Gold Coast Southport Traffic Area Health and Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area Knowledge Precinct Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - resident Yes - visitor Southport Traffic Area Traffic Area Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD The proposed boundaries are much more sensible than the existing boundaries Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area concerns addressed with proposed changes No LABRADOR, QLD Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic area totally unnecessary in the northern southport traffic area & never regulated since inception. Submission supports proposed amending law Enforcement No LABRADOR, QLD Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area Gold Coast Health and Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area concerns addressed with proposed changes No LABRADOR, QLD I live in Parkwood and we have never had students/hospital staff park in our street. The Health and knowledge precinct area is too wide spread, I understand it has to exist but the new boundaries seem more realistic. Gold Coast Health and Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Knowledge precinct Traffic Area concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No PARKWOOD, QLD Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - visitor I support these changes. The scaling back makes sense. Submission supports proposed amending law No ARUNDEL, QLD Don't have parking problems in my street. And it is inconvenient for visitors. Health and knowledge precint Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Support Support Yes - resident Health and knowkedge concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No LABRADOR, QLD I live in a street in Southport that became a 2hr zone before the Commonwealth Games. There were no problems with cars parkingher before and certainly none since. Removing the restriction will not generate an increase in cars in this area. Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support concerns addressed with proposed changes Parking was never an issue in my street No SOUTHPORT, QLD Labrador chirn park Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport, Labrador concerns addressed with proposed changes No LABRADOR, QLD Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area While this submission does not support all proposed changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident PARKWOOD and efficient use of the road network. No PARKWOOD, QLD Robina event Robina event traffic area traffic & parking It is now nearly impossible for disabled citizens to attend their lifelong favourite Not answered Support Not answered Not answered Yes - commuter events Submission supports proposed amending law No BENOWA, QLD Thankyou for reducing the size of the zones Southport and GCUH/griffith Support Support Support Support Yes - commuter U Submission supports proposed amending law No NERANG, QLD Whatever I think or say GCCC will do exactly as they want anyway. While this submission does not support all proposed Gold Coast Health and changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct. and efficient use of the road network. No SOUTHPORT, QLD I believe there should be a cap on how many spaces are available per unit, but not taken away completely, that is putting unnecessary stress and pressure on buyers, residents and locals. I feel it is a revenue making ploy on the councils behalf This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Support Oppose Yes - visitor Southport directly or indirectly impact this person. Development No JIMBOOMBA, QLD Request the traffic area for Robina be minimised....Residence living in have never had stadium traffic in their street, however under the current plan they are liable to infringement if an event is nominated on a day that While this submission does not support all proposed they park their car in the street changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Robina and efficient use of the road network. Remove my street from Traffic Area No ROBINA, QLD GCCC parking area schemes is nothing short of farcical. This is purely a revenue raising plan. I have no idea why the parking areas have been introduced in any of the residential areas. I can understand around business precincts for turnover reasons, however, conserving car parking spaces for home owners outside these precincts is ridiculous. These are public car parks to be enjoyed by all and should not time be time restricted to a few home owners if Council is serious about people part travelling to work and parking in residential streets to change mode to public transport. These precincts have only been introduced in residential areas so the Council can drive around collecting $70 dollars for the car owners that have parked their cars longer than the parking time period. The pay for parking idea in the business precincts outside of normal Monday to Friday business hours are too long. For example when you are trying to encourage business into Southport or Broadbeach why would you have paid parking outside the Monday to Friday business hours and on the weekend, time restrict to a couple of hours yes, pay no. You don't get it, with due resect people aren't on the gravy train( they cannot afford to pay) like the Council Executive staff and Councillors that make these stupid decisions and can afford to pay, people will not pay for parking as they can't afford it, GCCC is not mature enough for this . GCCC needs to take paid parking out of the business districts outside of Monday to Friday business hours at least until sustained business activity is occurring, otherwise, people will continue to shop in the malls etc that offer free parking and leave these areas dead for years to come, you need to make it competitive for the small business owners to encourage new shops to open and support them. Free parking will encourage families to areas where they may meet friends, buy lunch or drop a few dollars off at a local shops. Council should abolish residential street parking restriction throughout the Gold Coast, abolish paid parking outside of normal Monday to Friday business hours and on the weekends, time restrict these yes but make sure enough time such as 2- 2.5 hours to allow people to enjoy the experience. stop thinking about your revenue purse for a change GCCC and start bring business back to the Coast, because the current parking plans are hurting us all, just look at the vacancy rates across This submission supports implementation of proposed the commercial precincts. The same above applies to Bruce Bishop as well. At leats trials Southport for 6-12 months as see how it goes. changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Oppose Support Yes - visitor All directly or indirectly impact this person. Multiple issues/comments No MERMAID WATERS, QLD I’m a healthcare professional and find it ridiculous that we have to pay to park while at work when we are helping the sick, assisting them gain back their health and most importantly saving lives This submission has raised an issue that Council is not I’m a able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is healthcare under State Government control. professional and find it ridiculous that we have to pay to park while at work when we are helping the sick, assisting them gain back their health and most importantly Oppose Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - other saving lives State parking issue No ARUNDEL, QLD There are no where for the university students to park and for people who work in and around Southport. It costs my partner $30 a WEEK to park and then have to walk another 15 minutes to his job in Southport. They need to make MORE While this submission does not support all proposed FREE parking areas available OR have no limit on certain parks changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Not applicable Oppose Oppose Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport Robina and efficient use of the road network. No OXENFORD, QLD I commute to, through, and from the Southport Traffic Area for various personal and business connections and relations on a regular basis through out the week, and it is always such a struggle to find longer term parking than already available. This submission supports implementation of proposed Southport Robina On event days, Robina Stadium is always such a hassle to find convenient, close by parking that does not put the safety and security of my car, or myself during transit, at risk. changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Not applicable Support Not applicable Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Traffic Area Stadium directly or indirectly impact this person. No HIGHLAND PARK, QLD 2hrs parking around GCUH is an issue for staff and patients Submission supports proposed amending law. Feedback raised an issue that Council is not able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is under Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Yes - commuter State Government control. State parking issue No SOUTHPORT BC, QLD Absolutely no one from the hospital parks in our street. Please remove the 2 hr zones Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Health preceint concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD I abhor the fact that I have a 2 hour parking restriction outside my home on . This is totally unnecessary and I want it uplifted. This submission supports implementation of proposed Gold Coast Robina changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Oppose Support Support Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport Traffic Area Health Stadium directly or indirectly impact this person. Concerns addressed with proposal No LABRADOR, QLD The limits were introduced just before the Commonwealth games, at the time this was fine as it stopped people attending the hockey field parking in our already skinny street. However before this time and after this time the only people who park Submission supports proposed amending law. Gold Coast Health and in our area are residents and visitors of those residents. Some houses have limited parking, and given we all have family homes most have more than 1 or 2 cars. It was never a problem before the regulations were introduced, it is simply revenue Feedback provided will be considered during future Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes - resident Knowledge Precinct raising of innocent residents. We pay our overpriced rates, is that not enough. parking reviews. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No CHIRN PARK, QLD I like to visit Len fox park on marine parade for my sport and leisure activities and am required to transport bulky equipment for my leisure activities. I often spend hours on the water during my sporting activities and would not like to have to lessen Marine Parade my time and intensity to play cat and mouse with inspectors. Labrador/ Biggera Waters This appears to be off-street parking and therefore Not applicable Not answered Not applicable Oppose Yes - visitor /Southport does not fall within Traffic Area restrictions. Communicate messaging RUNAWAY BAY, QLD These proposed changes reduce residents right to park and also discourages affordable housing developments I’m a resident of Southport and these changes I feel will make me exempt from both residential and visitor parking permit impacting market value of property This submission supports implementation of proposed Lastly this is taking away a minimum standard of service of one vehicle per house. changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Oppose Support Support Oppose Yes - resident I am a resident of Southport directly or indirectly impact this person. Remove my street from Traffic Area No SOUTHPORT BC, QLD Less 2 hour parking in southport. especially for hospital and health services. Staff should not have to pay for parking (gold coast health taffic area) This submission has raised an issue that Council is not Gold coast Gold coast able to resolve as the responsibility for this matter is health health, under State Government control. services, southport, Support Support Oppose Support Yes - commuter Yes - visitor robina stadium billinga State parking issue No MERMAID BEACH, QLD Parkwood, . 2 hour Parkwood Submission supports proposed amending law - Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident parking not required here. does not require 2 hour parking. concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No PARKWOOD, QLD Southport and I object to these proposed laws as that requiring a minimum 6 m kerb frontage for Detached Premises Parking Permits discriminates against small-lot housing, one of the most affordable and sustainable housing models available today. While this submission does not support all proposed GC health changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe and and efficient use of the road network. knowledge Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Yes - resident Yes - commuter Yes - visitor Southport precinct Southport Parking permit criteria No SOUTHPORT BC, QLD Not wanted This submission supports implementation of proposed changes with the exception of a specific issue that may Support Support Support Support Yes - resident parkwood directly or indirectly impact this person. Reduce/remove Traffic Area PARKWOOD, QLD needs to be lifted from the 2 hr parking as well. There has been no extra cars parking in our st due to the tram. Please look into this Sam. Thank you While this submission does not support all proposed Gold Coast health and changes, they are being implemented to ensure safe Oppose Not answered Not answered Not answered Yes - resident knowledge precinct and efficient use of the road network. Reduce/remove Traffic Area No PARKWOOD, QLD I am a resident in the Southport My sister has been fined while parking out the front of my mum's house while she was visiting, and my fiance was fined for parking out the front of the same house, where we live. It is ridiculous that residents and guests cannot park in front of Support Support Support Support Yes - resident Traffic Area their houses without a permit. Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD Support 2hr parking remaining in place : we frequently have our driveway obstructed by ' visiting vehicles. Time limit does, on occasion, move the vehicles on via fear of being ticketed. Based on feedback in this submission, the proposed Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered changes are supported. Leave as is. No ABERGLASSLYN, NSW 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 142 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Visitors Parking Permit I have held a Visitors Parking Permit for a number of years having been in for over 20 years. at is unique having been built as the first mixed use building on the Gold Coast. It is bound on three sides by roads. Fronting and having two ground floor foyer entrances, one in and one in . They are both narrow one way streets and the yellow lines are adjacent to the building with adjacent to a narrow pedestrian ( ). There are limited parking metered spaces on the other side of the road with a pedestrian path. I have held and used the ‘visitors parking permit’ for a number of years for our visitors without any problems having had which restricted use to only. The new permit number is . There are only two residences remaining in of the original residences and offices. We have not applied for a residents Parking Permit over the years of being a resident preferring to use a VPP. is a narrow one way street with parking bays, loading and disabled bay on the southern side of the Road with the yellow no parking line adjacent to our building as it does in which whilst not a through road it traverses the Carpark with a narrow exit into . is very narrow and has limited parking and where students are always on the road during their breaks, causing a traffic hazard as they appear not to have adequate student facilities on site. We have a magnificent row of date palm trees adjacent to the building (on Council’s reserve) which limits the access for both vehicles and pedestrians through this street. was built 40 years ago. I have been happy to pay the $80 per year for the convenience of a VPP for our visitors and would like the opportunity to do so in the future for 2020 and beyond. I would consider that we have a special and unique case and situation as we do not have any two hour parking on street unless you are some distance away negating the intent of having Visitor Parking in the same street as the building and residence, and that would be against the conditions of the permit as it was before being changed last year when we were presented with two infringement notices, which council subsequently withdrew after submitting an objection as nothing had changed. I would like to continue to have a VPP for our unit as it is still a residence in a commercial mixed use building and there are not many options in the area for the intended use of providing a single visitors permit for our building. I would ask that this be taken into special consideration in Council's review of the Local Law, and we look forward to being invited to make application again for a VPP in 2020.

Not answered Not answered Not answered Not applicable Yes - resident Southport CBD No objection recorded For L&A to review permit circumstance No SOUTHPORT, QLD SOUTHERN TRAFFIC AREA (CHIRN PARK) Residential Area only - When we have visitors 2hr parking posess a time limit problem. We feel that this restriction is not suited to our area as we do not have CBD staff parking here. It is a dead end street and does not have a high volume of Submission supports proposed amending law - Not answered Not answered Not answered Support Yes - resident Southport Traffic Area traffic concerns addressed with proposed changes Concerns addressed with proposal No SOUTHPORT, QLD Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Free parking days... Should be a given here on the gc... Celebrate the financial abundance of the gc... 😁😁 And give Thursday afternoon free parking through out the gc area.. Not properly made submission No Unknown 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 143 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 Q3 (Do you support the proposed Q3 (Do you support amendments to the the proposed Q3 (Do you support Resident parking amendments to the the proposed permits?) Resident's Q4 (Your submission Q1 (Do you wish to Q2 (Your submission Q2 (Your submission Resident parking amendments to the Event parking permit - Q4 (Your submission about Resident's Event Q4 (Your submission make a submission about Resident parking about Resident parking permits?) Multi- Resident parking (Main Beach, Robina about Resident's Event parking permits affects about Resident's Event regarding any of the permits affects you permits affects you residential Premises permits?) Detached Stadium and (Carrara) parking permits affects you because:) parking permits affects above Resident because:) Multi- because:) Detached Resident / Visitor Premises Resident / Stadium Residential you because:) Robina (Carrara) Stadium you because:) Main Q5 (Please ensure your comments relate to Resident parking permits for this submission and are supported by the grounds (reasons for your submission) and the facts and circumstances (the evidence for your reasons). (Please indicate which Resident parking permit Changes parking permit types?) residential Premises Premises parking permit Visitor parking permit Traffic Areas) Stadium Traffic Area Residential Traffic Area Beach Traffic Area (s) your submission relates to.)) Submission Consideration by City Officers Recommended Q23 (Suburb) While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Oppose Oppose Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a visitor Parking is so hard to find, increasing restrictions will make things more difficult implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No BROADBEACH, QLD While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Not answered Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable I think parking permits should be available for all smaller apartment blocks up to 30 apartments and particularly for those built many years ago as the council allowed developments of 3 bed apartments with just 1 parking spot per apartment. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD

Robina parking permits should be freely available to residents within the 2 minute parking precinct! We deserve to be able to have visitors, gardeners, dog washers, trades people or just whoever the hell we like to visit our homes regardless of it being an event day!!!!!!! Seems like a money grab! We were here before While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Are a resident Support Support Support Not answered Not applicable Not applicable the stadium.... implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No ROBINA, QLD

The problem for permitting non area residents is more of an issue around pacific fair, where staff members are not allowed to park on-site, so park on nearby local,steeets. While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Financial Interest Financial Interest Oppose Oppose Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable In this instance I believe street parking should be priority for local residents . implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No MERMAID WATERS, QLD

I am a paid personal carer working in the Community and there is an Aged Care Facility in Southport When I went there to pick up a vision impaired and mobility impaired client to take for an urgent eye appointment I spent 1/2hr Looking for a parking spot. Of course we were late and this distressed the client and me. You should consider giving parking permits for these occasions to Community Organisations And Providers. This could apply to any Aged Care Facilitates in Restricted parking areas with no parking available. Yes Not applicable Not answered Not applicable Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not answered How would you like your elderly Mum or Dad to miss an important appointment for something that can be fixed. No valid reasoning for objection. No NERANG, QLD

In relation to Multi-residential Premises Resident / Visitor parking permits, the criteria for applicable dwellings should be broaden from premises with "parking immediately adjacent to the multi-residential premises" to "premises with parking adjacent or adjoining the boundary of the premises" (or similar), in order to While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Not applicable Not answered Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable allow premises where an on-street space is not entirely contained within the frontage of the allotment, to be eligible. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SOUTHPORT, QLD

The proposed changes making residents of multi-residential premises not eligible for parking permits leaves unit owners/ tenants at the mercy of developers, given there is no legal requirement for developers to ensure adequate parking is provided onsite. Developers being encouraged to provide this vs the reality Yes Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable that adequate parking is rarely factored in should not be ignored in this policy decision which in my view would discriminate against those residents who live in multi-residential premises. No valid reasoning for objection. No COOLANGATTA, QLD

I am a Gold Coast Resident and Council Rates Tax payer for 22 years. But since I live in a building that exceeds 30 units, I am not eligible to hold a Residents Parking Permit. This is absolutely disgraceful to treat otherwise equal paying GC Ratepayers in such a discriminatory fashion. There are times when offsite Yes Financial Interest Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Are a commuter Are a commuter Are a commuter parking is essential due to maintenance and other special circumstances. I am precluded this privilege because someone thinks that some Residents are more equal than others. A GC Ratepayer is a GC Ratepayer and all should equally have Residents Parking privileges. No valid reasoning for objection. No BROADBEACH, QLD

Yes Are a resident Not answered Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a visitor All GC rate paying residents should have access to COuncil Free and Unrestricted Parking permits-not just those who live in complexes less than 20 units. No valid reasoning for objection. No While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Not answered Not answered Not answered Oppose Not answered Not answered Are a resident I would like the streets of Main Beach to be left for residents to park at their leisure and not restricted. There is no overcrowding at present to warrant restrictions. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No MAIN BEACH, QLD Many detached dwellings in the Southport traffic area have less than 6m frontage (including my own), and changing the rules will negatively impact those residents. In our area there is always plentiful on street parking, or in the rare circumstance there a no spaces directly adjacent to our property there is sufficient While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Not answered Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not answered Not answered Not answered parking further along the road available. Removing these permits would negatively impact our ability to live in Southport and get to and from work if our cars were not easily accessable. I believe it would also negatively impact our property value as on street parking would be a concern for buyers. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SOUTHPORT, QLD The initial traffic area has been overkill, and created a lot of unnecessary difficulties for residents since the 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games when the city was a ghost town. Instead of enforcing parking zones, it would be nice to see council give incentives for the private sector to create parking spots. For example, if I could go back in time about 30 years I would build multi-level car parks throughout the Health and Knowledge Precinct because I could get a ton of patronage if I charged less than the $17 Wilson Parking is charging for three hours or more. One factor the traffic area fails to take into consideration is the number of multi-dwelling complexes where parking is at a premium and overflow parking is frequent. It is not fair to exclude parking permits available to complexes with 20 or more units, since complexes were not designed to accommodate so much visitor's parking even back in the early 1990s. New multi-unit dwellings are even stingier with parking spots and it seems having a parking spot for yourself has become a luxury these days, so overflow parking is going to continue to be a problem. Again, council should not be trying to enforce parking rather encourage more private sector engagement to relieve parking While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Visitor Support Support Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable congestion without costing the rate payer and subsidising those parking charges so they are low and affordable to all. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No LABRADOR, QLD The changes do not alter the excessively onerous and unfair implementation of the scheme, the changes are trivial. I am supportive of the idea of management of the parking in the areas indicated, however the cumbersome implementation of the rules has added significant paper work to what should be a simple task. The current system also discourages owners/developers from leaving space for on premises parking. The This submission supports implementation of the proposed changes with the exception Yes Not applicable Are a resident Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable current system disadvantages youth, i.e. house sharing in a single dwellings and whom frequently park at home during weekdays (as work shifts at night or the weekend). of a specific issue that may directly or indirectly impact this person No SOUTHPORT, QLD This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, Yes Are a resident Not answered Support Support Support Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a visitor I also would like to see visitor and residents parking permits issued once to a resident until they no longer reside there. Having to renew it every year is unnecessary and costly. feedback provided will be considered during future parking reviews No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD Yes Are a resident Not answered Support Support Support Are a resident Not answered Not answered I live at and on event days the parking is 2min, a permit would be good for when friends visit. No Objections recorded No ROBINA, QLD While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Not answered Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered I need a Resident parking permit. As a retiree I am moving my car multiple times a day to park legallyon the street in front of my own home. I pay rates etc and would expect as a resident to be able to park in front of my own home, even if it is a multi-residential building. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No BROADBEACH, QLD While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Not answered Oppose Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Parking Permits for Residents in residences up to 30 units. I am totally opposed to this as we will in apartments build way before 2018 and we have 74 units. WHAT ABOUT US AS RATE PAYERS????? Just one permit per unit would be helpful implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Are a resident Support Support Support Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a visitor I need resident parking and visitor parking permits to stop me from moving my vehicle every 2 hrs ,, Broadbeach , I pay enough rates to be able to park out the front of my own home. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No BROADBEACH WATERS, QLD Yes Not applicable Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Are a visitor Not applicable Not applicable We are the only house in the whole estate that HAS NO on street parking. We require 4 spots ONLY ON OCCASIONS when visitors come and not permanent!! I hope this will still be the case!! This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes No MUDGEERABA, QLD Yes Not answered Not applicable Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered .. Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No I require all parking types as our workers require permits on a daily basis to support participants with disability.

There are proposed amendments to the following Resident parking permit types: 1) Multi-residential Premises Resident / Visitor parking permits 2) Detached Premises Resident / Visitor parking permits While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Visitor Support Support Support Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a resident 3) Resident's Event parking permits (Main Beach, Robina Stadium and (Carrara) Stadium Residential Traffic Areas). implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD In our 24 unit block, every residence is 3 bdrm. It is reasonable to assume that every unit owns at least 2 vehicles of which there is one undercover garaged car park per unit. Since the introduction of the 3hr limit parking on the street; we have had to use our 2nd vehicle to drive to work (instead of utilising the tram a few minutes walk from our street) in order to avoid a parking infringement by leaving the car at home. We would use the permit to park our 2nd vehicle on our street outside, While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Not applicable Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable and once again take the tram to work. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No Regarding multiresidential and detached residential areas- in my role as an , I visit clients who are blind or have low vision at their home and teach them skills to mobilise safely inside their homes and from their home to locations within their residential area. Currently, partway through a While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Visitor Visitor Support Support Support Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a visitor lesson I need to stop the lesson to move the car. Also, if we are outdoors in unfamiliar areas to the client, I have to guide the client back to a familiar area/safety, usually back to their residence, move the car, then guide them back out to the training area. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No MORAYFIELD, QLD This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, Yes Are a resident Not answered Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable I have no additional comments. Im not sure why we need paper permits in our cars. We should be able to just manage number plates via a web interface. It is 2019. feedback provided will be considered during future parking reviews No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD Hi, I would like to see on street parking disappear completely freeing up the road to be used as a road and enabling cyclists to use the cycle lane instead of parked cars. I would prefer to see residences obliged to provide their own off street parking for residents and visitors, with on-street parking phased out over a This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, Yes Are a resident Not answered Support Oppose Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Are a resident number of years to allow adjustments to be made to premises - and no more high-rises without adequate parking provided. feedback provided will be considered during future parking reviews No PARADISE WATERS, QLD As a visitor to these areas I am supportive of the Resident Parking changes as they seem responsive to a range of needs and will hopefully make developers of multi- residential sites build in more appropriate provisions for residential car spaces (& for carer support type spaces etc) on site. Provisions for Yes Not applicable Are a resident Support Support Support Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a visitor emergency vehicles, support services and evacuation sites/open space must be a high priority as the city becomes more densely populated. Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No ELANORA, QLD This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, Yes Are a resident Not answered Support Oppose Oppose Are a visitor Not applicable Are a visitor I have to ask why there is specific notice of a permit not being applied to a motor bike? This is discriminatory feedback provided will be considered during future parking reviews No MERMAID BEACH, QLD I oppose the changes to the multi-residential resident/ visitor passes. The resident visitor passes to begin with and the inclusion of the area to be free of paid parking. People have bought in these areas years ago and now have restrictions of people visiting them. I have family members that live in different zones. There is no allowance for family members to visit. They are already paying a premium in rates and now cannot have people visit during the week. My sister has just had twins and has a 3 year old but I have to worry about moving my car every couple of hours or she needs to move hers when she visits our mother. While I understand the need for time restrictions in the areas, these should not be affecting local residents. More needs to be done to look after these residents, as I stated earlier, who are already paying high rates due to their location. People need to be able to visit family members without worry in any area of the While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Visitor Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Gold Coast. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD Yes Not applicable Are a resident Not applicable Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Detached Premises Resident / Visitor parking permits Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No HOLLYWELL, QLD Disability parking permit is required Use disability parking permit only Yes Visitor Visitor Support Support Support Are a visitor Not answered Are a visitor Disability parking permit will be used for the disability people only Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No SOUTHPORT, QLD Yes Are a resident Not answered Support Not answered Not answered Are a resident Not answered Not answered During football session I am unable to park in my local street where as a boat does not get fined and has a permit. I would like a permit to park in my own street. Thanks Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No ROBINA, QLD Very hard to live in a place where you cannot park on your own street because of parking restrictions. If I lived in the heart of Broadbeach I would understand but I live in Mermaid Beach in a 3 bedroom unit. It has 4 adults living in it. We have 2 car spaces!!! So the other 2 adults living in the unit don’t have anywhere to park, aren’t eligible for permits and have to face fines if they happen to be home during the week. Means that we have to drive to work to get our cars off our street during the day when we would VERY happily walk down and catch the tram if our car could sit safely on the street without getting fined!!! While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Not applicable Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable What’s the point of public transport ?!? implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No MERMAID BEACH, QLD While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Not applicable Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable It’s simple - any Detached Dwelling resident should have the same rights if they live in a mansion, a unit or a tiny house. Silly concept to discriminate based on kerb frontage. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No HOPE ISLAND, QLD Submission: Detached Premises Resident / Visitor parking permit I live on Varisty Lakes. I have been reading through the new parking permit information. Currently, as I have two garage spaces, I get 1 parking permit and have to pay $88 for a visitor permit as I have two sons who drive and have their own cars. Am I reading it correctly that the proposed rules will only allow me one residential permit and NO eligibility for a visitors permit???? And yet a detached house with no garage or carport can get up to 6 permits (3 residential and 3 visitor). If this is correct, how is this fair? Generally speaking a house with no garage or carport will be a smaller house. We live in a 5 bedroom house, and have two driver age children at home. This cannot be uncommon with the trend for young-adult children to remain at home due to study, or inability to afford purchasing / renting a house of their own. I am really concerned that we are going to have even less parking eligibility than we do now, While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Not answered Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable which would make our life more difficult when both our boys need they cars for work. While I am not happy about having to pay for a visitor permit, I am accepting of it if it means ALL my family can park their cars. Please at the very least leave the criteria as is! implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No VARSITY LAKES, QLD Multi residential permits. Residents of multi residential properties should not have to suffer because of decisions that previous councils have made. The developers of such places should have been required to have more than 1 car space per unit, as I think current developments should too. Unless you live on the Gold Coast highway or very close to it, Gold Coast residents require a car to get around as our public transport is dismal and unreliable. We should not be restricted on parking in our own street, especially when there are no other options available for parking of cars. Restricting parking in certain areas will only lead to more problems in Yes Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable other nearby areas as residents need to park in streets other than their own. This will also encourage crime as unattended cars are left in the streets overnight. Please rethink these proposed changes. No valid reasoning for objection. No VARSITY LAKES, QLD Yes Not applicable Are a resident Oppose Oppose Oppose Are a resident Are a resident Not applicable Robina Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No ROBINA, QLD Detached Premises Parking Permit. We need to promote small lots and minimalistic living. There is no way our future generations will be able to afford their own homes at the increasing rate of the housing market. We need more sustainable living for the environment which also means downsizing. Making parking unavailable to those who choose to While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Not applicable Financial Interest Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable live on a small lot is not assisting this change! It is not fair that smaller lots should have less opportunity with parking permits. This is something we should praise and encourage. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No GAYTHORNE, QLD As a permanent resident in a multi-dwelling, (44 unit) high rise which is predominantly rented for holiday use, other than the 5 units used by owners as permanent residences we do not qualify under any of the conditions for a visitor's or extra vehicle parking permit. We do have 1 allocated basement car park for Yes Are a resident Visitor Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable our 1 registered vehicle, but once regulated parking comes into force in the Rainbow bay area there is no provision for visitor parking should we have a visitor to 2-3 days. How does Council plan to accommodate this necessity for permanent residents? Our building was built and registered in 1982. Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No COOLANGATTA, QLD Southport- Southport is the only area that effects myself and my friends, however I still feel for all the other poor relevant residents who will also be facing hurdles and difficulties if the parking regulations do change. I feel the proposed changes are deeply unfair and unnecessary to current and future residents. This is mainly due to the fact that; It makes their properties less appealing, therefore de-valuing it. It makes the residents lives harder and more inconvenient, especially If they have no onsite parking and kurb frontages less than 6m (which seems to be coming more and more common-especially in southport) While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Not answered Financial Interest Oppose Oppose Oppose Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a visitor It takes away the residents rights. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No CORINDA, QLD the legislation that would address each of these concerns. Concerns:‐ 1. Ex post facto removal of residents’ rights The daytime on street carparking rights of detached and multi residential premises have been removed ex post facto based on a 6m design consideration that housing developers/designers, and their purchasers, could not have predicted or planned for, and which carry a significant negative ongoing lifestyle and economic impacts. 2. Denies a minimum standard of service The proposed legislation lacks consideration of its stated purpose of “…providing quality transport related social and economic outcomes…” by not respecting the need for a for a minimum standard of service for all residents as it denies the most vulnerable citizens the right to park a vehicle within a safe and reasonable pedestrian shed of their dwelling; 3. Discriminates against affordable housing configurations Developments containing smaller lots and/or homes with less off street carparking are being discriminated against, both ex post facto and moving forward, by the introduction of the new and severely restrictive minimum 6m kerb frontage eligibility criteria; 4. Divisive and inefficient to administer The administration of permit applications would be complicated by the new 6m minimum kerb frontage eligibility criteria that will time consuming and serve to be divisive between neighbours (where the available kerb is shared across property lines and/or where one neighbour is eligible and one is not on a basis of mere millimetres). Genuine eligibility will also be difficult to confirm from a desktop review perspective, and refusals will be vulnerable to numerous emotive appeals,‐ as they will represent significant lifestyle and property value consequences; 5. Contradicts its stated purpose ‐ Misrepresentations on the City of Gold Coast website “Have your say…” banner make it appear as though the proposed legislation “…focuses on freeing up on street spaces for residents and short to medium term visitors…”, when, in fact, the legislation serves to restrict on street spaces for residents and their visitors, impacting them negatively while inadvertently benefiting non residents; ‐ 6. Erroneous documentation Consistent errors in the Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 Consolidated Version fail to highlight as a change the introduction of the 30 October 2018 sunset date applicable to multi residential permits, causing confusion and misunderstandings; 7. Unwarranted severity Empirical evidence backed by photographs taken during the hours of restricted parking throughout the public consultation period indicate that in areas where the legislation will have the greatest negative impact on residents, there is currently ample daytime carparking available, with no perceivable problem that needs addressing; and, 8. Restricts the rights of residents who choose a sustainable Home based business lifestyle As residents choosing a Home based business serve to reduce traffic from the city’s busy road network, it is contrary to a good public outcome to penalise their efforts at transportation sustainability by removing their basic rights as a resident because of their choice. Compromises: ‐ 1. INTRODUCE A GRANDFATHER CLAUSE FOR THE NEW 6M ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Introduce a grandfather clause provision for residents of both detached premises and multi residential premises who have obtained their water connection prior to 30 October 2018 to be exempt from the 6m frontage eligibility requirement, allowing the 6m rule to be considered at the design stage of developments moving forward. ‐ 2. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 1 RESIDENT PERMIT FOR ALL PREMISES WITH NO PROVISION FOR OFF STREET VEHICLES Allow all residents who have no provision for off street vehicle, whether in detached premises or multi residential premises, to be eligible for 1 resident parking permit and 1 visitor parking permit, regardless of kerb frontage or home business use, as a minimum standard of service that prioritises residents’ car parking over other users. While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Visitor Are a resident Oppose Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not answered Not answered implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SOUTHPORT, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 144 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 Q3 (Do you support the proposed Q3 (Do you support amendments to the the proposed Q3 (Do you support Resident parking amendments to the the proposed permits?) Resident's Q4 (Your submission Q1 (Do you wish to Q2 (Your submission Q2 (Your submission Resident parking amendments to the Event parking permit - Q4 (Your submission about Resident's Event Q4 (Your submission make a submission about Resident parking about Resident parking permits?) Multi- Resident parking (Main Beach, Robina about Resident's Event parking permits affects about Resident's Event regarding any of the permits affects you permits affects you residential Premises permits?) Detached Stadium and (Carrara) parking permits affects you because:) parking permits affects above Resident because:) Multi- because:) Detached Resident / Visitor Premises Resident / Stadium Residential you because:) Robina (Carrara) Stadium you because:) Main Q5 (Please ensure your comments relate to Resident parking permits for this submission and are supported by the grounds (reasons for your submission) and the facts and circumstances (the evidence for your reasons). (Please indicate which Resident parking permit Changes parking permit types?) residential Premises Premises parking permit Visitor parking permit Traffic Areas) Stadium Traffic Area Residential Traffic Area Beach Traffic Area (s) your submission relates to.)) Submission Consideration by City Officers Recommended Q23 (Suburb) sorts of "interpretations" of the local laws that are not stated clearly on the GC city council website or in any other documents we found at the time of purchasing the house and land package. We were eventually able to obtain 1 residential permit and advised a new system was coming in that would eliminate our ability to have a residential parking permit or even a visitor parking permit. We as a house hold have actively chosen not to have one of our vehicles (a large 4WD) at our premises on a daily basis as it is simply to be for the area, however on the occasions that we need that vehicle, we are unable to park it on the street for more than 2 hours. I have provided further concerns and suggested compromises below.

Concerns: 1. Ex post facto removal of residents’ rights The daytime on street carparking rights of detached and multi-residential premises have been removed ex post facto based on a 6m design consideration that housing developers/designers, and their purchasers, could not have predicted or planned for, and which carry a significant negative ongoing lifestyle and economic impacts. 2. Denies a minimum standard of service The proposed legislation lacks consideration of its stated purpose of “…providing quality transport related social and economic outcomes…” by not respecting the need for a for a minimum standard of service for all residents as it denies the most vulnerable citizens the right to park a vehicle within a safe and reasonable pedestrian shed of their dwelling; 3. Discriminates against affordable housing configurations Developments containing smaller lots and/or homes with less off street carparking are being discriminated against, both ex post facto and moving forward, by the introduction of the new and severely restrictive minimum 6m kerb frontage eligibility criteria; 4. Divisive and inefficient to administer The administration of permit applications would be complicated by the new 6m minimum kerb frontage eligibility criteria that will time consuming and serve to be divisive between neighbours (where the available kerb is shared across property lines and/or where one neighbour is eligible and one is not on a basis of mere millimetres). Genuine eligibility will also be difficult to confirm from a desktop review perspective, and refusals will be vulnerable to numerous emotive appeals, as they will represent significant lifestyle and property value consequences; 5. Contradicts its stated purpose Misrepresentations on the City of Gold Coast website “Have your say…” banner make it appear as though the proposed legislation “…focuses on freeing up on-street spaces for residents and short to medium term visitors…”, when, in fact, the legislation serves to restrict on street spaces for residents and their visitors, impacting them negatively while inadvertently benefiting non-residents; 6. Erroneous documentation Consistent errors in the Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 Consolidated Version fail to highlight as a change the introduction of the 30 October 2018 sunset date applicable to multi-residential permits, causing confusion and misunderstandings; 7. Unwarranted severity Empirical evidence backed by photographs taken during the hours of restricted parking throughout the public consultation period indicate that in areas where the legislation will have the greatest negative impact on residents, there is currently ample daytime carparking available, with no perceivable problem that needs addressing; and, 8. Restricts the rights of residents who choose a sustainable Home based business lifestyle As residents choosing a Home based business serve to reduce traffic from the city’s busy road network, it is contrary to a good public outcome to penalise their efforts at transportation sustainability by removing their basic rights as a resident because of their choice. Customer's property has limited off-street parking, and currently may be eligible for an Compromises: on-street parking permit due to ambiguity of the current wording in the law however they 1. INTRODUCE A GRANDFATHER CLAUSE FOR THE NEW 6M ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA will not be eligible under the proposed amendments. It is not possible to amend the law Introduce a grandfather clause provision for residents of both detached premises and multi-residential premises who have obtained their water connection prior to 30 October 2018 to be exempt from the 6m frontage eligibility requirement, allowing the 6m rule to be considered at the design stage of developments for individual situations. With the demand on the Gold Coast parking system continuing moving forward. to grow as permanent and visitor populations increase, the parking permit scheme is Yes Not applicable Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable designed to best manage parking for the City as a whole. No SOUTHPORT, QLD Yes Financial Interest Not applicable Support Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable SOuthern Beaches - Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No COOLANGATTA, QLD I provide this submission in response to the changes proposed to the local law that affect residences with less that 6m of frontage (as defined within the local law). It is my belief that the proposed change to discriminate against residents of such properties is unfair, unwarranted, and therefore unreasonable.

It is not clear as to why this change has been proposed, but it seems that regardless of the width of property frontage, the parking permit will not restrict the permit holder from parking in front of other properties in any case. In fact, if there has been an identified need for parking regulation in the area, it would be unlikely that anyone could park in the same spot every time they come and go due to the high parking demand in the street.

Based on that, under the proposed change to the local law, a resident of a property with a frontage in excess of 6m will be able to apply for a parking permit and park anywhere in the street, yet a resident of a property with less that a 6m frontage cannot.

For this change to have been proposed in the local law, there must have been an on-going problem caused by one or more residents of properties with frontages less than 6m that has drawn Council's attention to such properties. The reason for this is not stated, but it could not be justified anyway. The reason for people applying for a parking permit in a high parking demand street does not relate to their property frontage width, it relates to the lack of availability of parking in the street.

While it is understood that Council is working to address a problem of parking space demand, this should be done with equity in mind and not with a baseless discriminatory approach. The clause that discriminates against residents for no other reason than the fact that they live in properties with a frontage width While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Not applicable Not applicable Oppose Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable of less than 6m should be removed from this local law amendment. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No BURLEIGH HEADS, QLD I have Resident parking permit : R Central traffic area . I reside at ,Surfers Pdse ( units, 3 storey walk up bldg), & yellow lines pass property because of the tram - have been parking 2nd vehicle in .(directly opposite), about 100 mts.away where we can see/check on it- it is sml.m/home - husband CANNOT walk too far,(open heart op. years ago) so ideal as he can start motor up to stop going flat when not using it to go away (BOTH IN 'S)-To store vehicle in paid facility BEYOND our financial means & wouldn't be able to start motor to stop battery going flat. He drives it, not myself. There IS room in & no complaints-As yellow lines outside our bldg, we need MORE consideration than property without lines, we feel; esp. as tram helps & services so many. Our property bldg. is about yrs.old, and steep driveway & NO OFF-STREET PARKING, like a HiRise, even for While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Financial Interest Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable tradesmen - we are severely impacted as it is - PLEASE DON'T CRIPPLE US EVEN FURTHER. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD Customer's property has limited off-street parking, and currently may be eligible for an I do not support the proposed changes to the permit system. Primarily I do not support it because it reduces the permits available to me from two (2) residents permits and a visitor permit to no parking permits. I believe a one-off change like this is unreasonable in particular because new housing has been on-street parking permit due to ambiguity of the current wording in the law however they approved by the City for development based on the current parking permits. will not be eligible under the proposed amendments. It is not possible to amend the law If the City wishes to change this, they should do it with greater consultation with the community and with an understanding that all residents should be entitled to some parking and the availability of visitor parking. for individual situations. With the demand on the Gold Coast parking system continuing While I acknowledge that long term the proposed restrictions may be appropriate, to make them workable the City needs to put more considerable effort into car alternatives. This includes but is not limited to improved public transport, improved bicycle and pedestrian access. This includes prioritising pedestrians to grow as permanent and visitor populations increase, the parking permit scheme is Yes Not applicable Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable and bicycles over cars. Once further work is done to improve these facilities such that it is more realistic for residents to forego cars, it is unrealistic to put in somewhat draconian restrictions such as those proposed. designed to best manage parking for the City as a whole. No SOUTHPORT, QLD Yes Are a resident Are a resident Support Support Support Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a commuter I live in a Southport 2P area and have two housemates who park on the street. Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No SOUTHPORT, QLD Yes Are a resident Are a resident Support Support Support Are a commuter Are a commuter Are a commuter Please do this Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No RUNAWAY BAY, QLD Being the holder of a disability parking permit, I strongly disagree with the addition of a carer's parking permit. Whether or not a Carer is doing business on behalf of the person they care for is beside the point. The point of a designated disability parking space is to provide relief for the disabled person when they are visiting areas. When you have a disability, you need ease of access to certain areas and the disabled parking bays are for this very reason. I can't see why an able bodied carer would need to take a disabled parking bay when they themselves are not suffering with any physical impairment. It can be extremely Yes Not applicable Are a resident Oppose Oppose Oppose Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a visitor challenging due to the limited supply of disabled bays and sometimes a disabled person misses out on a spot. This amendment would just place more strain on an already strained supply of disabled parking. comment/s not relevant No PACIFIC PINES, QLD Yes Not answered Are a resident Support Support Not applicable Are a visitor Are a visitor Are a visitor Southport and labrador residential parking permits that were put in place for the commonwealth games , are unnecessary now and have not yet been removed Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No SOUTHPORT, QLD All premises with no off street car parking, regardless of size, should at least be able to obtain one Resident Permit (minimum standard of service and in support of affordability) “It’s simple - a resident. if they are, should have the same rights if they live in a mansion, a unit or a tiny house? Silly concept.” While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Not answered Are a resident Not answered Oppose Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered The disparity between the houses that “have and have not” those critical millimetres will most effect the very residents who have invested in the purchase of a home within walking distance of their work or public transport, only to find they now must drive in order to avoid a parking fine! implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SOUTHPORT, QLD Resident Parking Permits Oppose Detached Premises Parking Permits: The requirement for a minimum of six metres parking space measured along the kerbside frontage of the detached premises land would affect residents of existing and future tiny lot / micro housing (lot width less than 10m), by removing their eligibility for on-street resident and visitor parking permits. Public transport in the city is still not adequate for residents of even tiny lot housing not to own a car. They will own at least 1 car per tiny lot. Fact: To remove eligibility for on-street resident and visitor parking permits from existing and future tiny lot housing would render this housing type unfeasible, which does not support the City Plan Strategic Intent (3.2.1 World Class City) to provide housing that is affordable, attractive and diverse, as well as to increase housing choice across the city. Tiny lot housing appears very similar to townhouse-type multi-residential development. The key difference being lot subdivision for an individual ownership model. Beyond the titling arrangement, there is very little difference between the housing types. Under the proposed amendments, existing townhouse developments (of fewer then 20 dwellings and constructed prior to 30 October 2018) would be eligible for parking permits where there is a minimum of six metres clear legal parking space measured along the kerbside frontage in front of the Community Title Scheme premises. This would be measured across the entire lot width of all the townhouses. The removal of permit eligibility from existing tiny lot (constructed prior to 30 October 2018) would have a particularly detrimental affect upon residents of these dwellings. This is particularly unfair given the existing townhouses developments would retain their permit eligibility.

Event Parking Permits Main Beach Traffic Area Main Beach contains a large number of older multi-residential apartment buildings that were constructed under previous Gold Coast planning schemes, and rely upon on-street resident parking. To remove resident permit eligibility during Events would affect many residents of Main Beach. Fact: Many of the multi-residential apartment buildings in Main Beach contain greater than 20 units and many of these units are provided with only 1 off-street car parking space per unit (2 bedroom units), having been constructed under superseded planning schemes. Residents rely upon on-street parking, many if not most residents own 2 cars. To remove resident permits during Events would mean residents must move their vehicles to on-street parking areas within other surrounding suburbs, then commute back to Main Beach. As well as inconveniencing Main Beach residents, this also inconveniences residents of While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Are a resident Visitor Support Oppose Oppose Not answered Not answered Are a resident surrounding suburbs by increasing demand for on-street parking in those areas during Events. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No MAIN BEACH, QLD While I don't necessarily think that the legislation should remain as is, I do think that removing the right to on-street parking permits for Detached Premises with a kerb frontage of less than 6 m is both discriminatory and detrimental, as it punishes only those who have chosen more environmentally and While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Not applicable Financial Interest Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable economically sustainable housing options (e.g. small-lot freehold housing). implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No HAWTHORN, VIC Amendements to Part 2 section 4 which discriminate against housing frontages of less than 6 m will inhibit medium density housing options for the Gold Coast. This is healthy ‘missing middle’ options for the region that will address both overdevelopment in the core and underdevelopment in suburbs. As an engineer I am concerned that urban sprawl is creating expensive low-density infrastructure that future generations will need to pay for while at the same time destroying the world class ecology on the Gold Coast. These amendments are too simplistic in dealing with the trade-offs between high density housing and While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Not applicable Visitor Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable increased traffic. I would recommend a more in-depth evaluation of the cost-benefit of traffic reduction vs increased medium density developments. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SOUTHPORT, QLD Customer's property has limited off-street parking, and currently may be eligible for an on-street parking permit due to ambiguity of the current wording in the law however they will not be eligible under the proposed amendments. It is not possible to amend the law Restricting parking permits to houses with more than 6m of kerb frontage is discouraging to those who have purchased and choose to live in small lot housing. Small lot housing is a massive benefit to Southport and residents of the Gold Coast, providing affordable, sustainable housing in the inner city area. It is for individual situations. With the demand on the Gold Coast parking system continuing unfair that one house with kerb frontage of more than 6m can secure up to 6 car parking permits. They are allowed to park anywhere around the suburb freely, but those who live in a small lot are forced to park outside of their suburb during the working week hours (or are restricted to hour hours within their own to grow as permanent and visitor populations increase, the parking permit scheme is Yes Not applicable Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable suburb). We are home owners too and we deserve parking permits, if six are available to those who have larger houses we should have the right to apply for at least the number of rooms within the small lot household. designed to best manage parking for the City as a whole. No SOUTHPORT, QLD

I purchased my property, which has provision for one (1) off street vehicle, with the full knowlege and expectation that I would be able to obtain parking permits for my partner and roommate, as well as visitor parking permits for when my family visits from overseas. I work at as a , and I find that I cannot afford to drive to work and park at my place of employment and pay for parking their, plus car parking there is best reserved for those who are not able to take public transporation. The truth is, I take the GLINK to work almost every day, which is why my car stays at home. Howeer, I do require a place for my partner, who is a tiler and uses his vehicle for work, but my decision to purchase a home near public transportation was a deliberate effort to reduce traffic on Gold Coast roads. To be forced to drive to work, and take a valuable parking place away from someone who needs it more, seems counterproductive to sustainability and an efficient use of infrastructure resoucrces. But, what is even more distrubing to me is that it is obvious, from my review of the Consolidated Version of the legeslation, that the currently legislation permits me to have 2 resident permits and 3 visitor permits, yet I have been denied the right to have any permits at all, with my application last year being refused. It appears that the 6m kerb frontage criteria, which is the key new eligibility criteria being proposed by the legislation, was applied to my permit, even though it was not contained in the existing legislation. As a result of being denied a parking permit, my partner has already incurred at least one parking fine. As a First Home Owner, I was so pleased to find my freehold title home in such a central area of the city. I love walking to shops and transport, and I love living close to my neighbours and friends. However, it was a struggle to obtain finance, and becoming in eligible for parking permits will decrease the value of my home, and upset my already challenging financial balance. It does not seem fair that I would be so discriminated against, just for having chosen a smaller and more sustainable house, when other homes with larger kerb frontages would have access to up to six (6) permits, depending on how many off street vehicles they provide for. Customer's property has limited off-street parking, and currently may be eligible for an I have worked very hard to secure my new home, and I am devastated that the Council may inadvertently steal my joy by making it difficult for my partner to accommodate his working vehicle within our neigbhourhood. To me, the proposed 6m kerb frontage eligibility criteria seems contrary to the principles of on-street parking permit due to ambiguity of the current wording in the law however they affordable housing in urban areas, just where you need it most, i.e., close to jobs and schools. will not be eligible under the proposed amendments. It is not possible to amend the law Please consider the people that your legislation imacts. We may sometimes seem like numbers on a data base, but the proposed car parking permit changes have a genune and substantial negative impact on my lifestyle and finances, and yet I cannot see any overall benefit that the city or the community will for individual situations. With the demand on the Gold Coast parking system continuing receive from this injury. Our street is empty during the day, and I am sure that it is advantageious for the city not to have more cars on their major roads. to grow as permanent and visitor populations increase, the parking permit scheme is Yes Not applicable Are a resident Not applicable Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable I am hoping that these issues will become clear throgh the public consultation process, and that the legeslation will not be implemented as proposed. designed to best manage parking for the City as a whole. No SOUTHPORT, QLD

Please refer to the document following this submission form for the reasons for my submission, the facts and circumstances and evidence for my reasons. My submission refers to the Southport Traffic Area. Proposed changes to parking permit eligibility for detached premises within designated Traffic Areas where “parking is regulated by time” are not supported by this submission, based on the following points: 1. Retrospective removal of on-street car parking permit eligibility - When I purchased my property, I was able to obtain parking permits for my visitors, as , from time to time, I receive visits from out of state friends. Although my study of the legislation as proposed seems to indicate in Clause 11(a)(iii) of the Consolidated Version that I can obtain three (3) visitor permits, Table 2 of the summary indicates that I am not eligible for any. The legislation is therefore not clear on this point, but it is important to me to be able to have visitors stay more than just two hours during the day, as – being a pilot – my free time does not always coincide with the standard weekend timeframe. 2. Devaluation of my property and my neighbours’ properties - Although I will still eligible to obtain resident and hopefully visitor parking permits, my brother next door, and my other neighbours, will not be eligible, and their properties will loose value as a result. As the value of their properties goes down, so will my value. The devaluation of our properties seems so unfair and unnecessary, as we do not have a parking problem on our street during the day, and I have never heard of any negative comments or complaints. If my property value goes down significantly, I may be called by my bank to top up my deposit, which I may not be able to do. I understand that markets do go up and down, but to have my own Council introduce legislation that will obviously have a negative effect on residents’ property values seems irresponsible. 3. Goes against the village philosophy - While observing the architect of the ENVI development, where my house is located on a 43m2 lot, piece together the intricate puzzle that our village represents, I learned how it’s the delicate balance of the driveway linkages to the street that has allowed me to be able to afford the purchase of my first house. Having become accustomed to living in Sydney, there is absolutely no way I would be able to afford a new house in a central area there. However, because of the ability for the lot on Meron Street to support ten (10) homes, each of those homes became more affordable, and I was lucky to be able to purchase one. However, if each of the homes had to have a driveway and car parking of its own, there could only have been five or six houses all up, and my deposit would not have been enough for the larger price tag that would have resulted. I am indebted to the purchasers of the Pico Pod, my brother, and the Micro Terraces, as it was their sacrifice and ability to embrace the innovation of a house with no provision for off-street car parking that allowed me to be able to afford my house, which does have provision for one vehicle in my single garage. 4. Discourages future affordable housing - Hardly a day goes by without some article on the missing middle or affordable housing, and today is no different. Below is an excerpt from an article on this very topic, demonstrating government support for affordability and innovation, rather than the contrary: "Apartment-style living is a great choice for some but it's not necessarily for everyone," "Detached homes in the ever-expanding suburbs are out of reach for many families. "The beauty of terrace-style housing is that it's low-rise, it's human scale, it doesn't overshadow everyone else." NSW Planning Minister Rob Stokes (Read in ABC News: https://apple.news/Aa6xB9_7RRvmYTSUdGMItXQ ) I see the ENVI urban subdivision model as an equally important human scale intervention in existing neighbourhoods. As far as I am aware, our established neighbours love the ENVI development, and wonder why there are not more like it. However, developments containing smaller lots and/or homes with less off-street carparking will now be discouraged by the >6m kerb frontage eligibility criteria, even though these forms of development deliberately cater to the provision of affordable infill housing. 5. Divisive - Although I will still be eligible to obtain resident and hopefully visitor parking permits, my brother next door, and my other neighbours will not be eligible. This situation will be uncomfortable for me as a basis of my relationship with new neighbours – and even my family – and seems unnecessarily divisive and unfair. 6. Extreme in its disparity - Although not personally effected by the proposed removal of parking permit eligibility, it seems unjust and extreme to change any homeowner’s situation so dramatically, i.e., to one day be eligible for up to six (6) permits allowing parking on the street during the working day, then – after just a three week consultation process – all of the sudden you cannot park even one car in your own neighbourhood without fear of incurring a parking fine. Surely there must be a fairer way to make the numbers work within the community, as some owners simply do not have a choice to give up their car. Further, While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Visitor Financial Interest Not applicable Not answered Oppose Not applicable Not answered Not applicable how could they know that they may be faced with such a choice when they purchased their new home, recently approved and sanctioned by Council in the most forward-thinking and innovation-inclusive precinct of the Gold Coast CBD, i.e., the Priority Development Area. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SOUTHPORT, QLD 1999730 Please refer to the document following this Submission Form for the reasons for my submission, the facts and circumstances and evidence for my reasons. While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Visitor Financial Interest Not applicable Not answered Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable My submission refers primarily, but not exclusively, to the Southport Traffic Area refer to iSPot #73794385 for customers attached submission information implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD 1999758 Please refer to the document following this Submission Form for the reasons for my submission, the facts and circumstances and evidence for my reasons. My submission refers primarily, but not exclusively, to the Southport Traffic Area While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Financial Interest Financial Interest Not applicable Not answered Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Refer to iSpot # for customer submission information. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD 1999774 Attachment: Grounds and Circumstance – Detached premises resident parking permit provision: The amendment proposes that for a resident in a detached premises that a resident parking permit may only be granted where “the detached premises have a kerb side frontage of more than 6m” – Part 4 Section 11 Cl 11 (a) (iv) This submission does not believe this provision should be approved in its current form and the grounds and circumstances for that position are provided below. 1. Retrospectively takes away resident’s rights - Under the existing local law, a resident in detached premises could be granted a resident parking permit where the kerb side frontage was less than 6m. Consequently, once the local law amendment comes into force, there will be residents who once could apply and be granted a permit now cannot be granted a permit. This will be particularly unfair for residents of premises that are caught by this new restriction and who do not have off street parking spaces. As an example, in the and projects in the Southport Traffic Area in and there are three existing and two approved dwellings respectively that have no onsite car parking and under the amendment will have no ability to be approved for a resident parking permit. This appears very unfair and discriminatory. 2. Devalues properties - For any premises that does not have off street car parking spaces and has a kerb frontage less than 6m, the residents of that premises who own cars will be faced with the choices of: • Risking fines when they park in the street during the day, or have to shift their vehicle every two hours • Parking their vehicle outside the Traffic Area or • Giving up their vehicle. These choices are all negative, and consequently will detrimentally impact on the value of their property. The Garden Terrace project at 30 Lenneberg Street Southport has two proposed dwellings that have no off street car parking and a kerb frontage of less than 6m. The submitter sought approval for this project from Council in late 2016 and it was approved on the 9th July 2017 (MCU 201701634). At no time during that approval process was the prospect of the residents not being able to park in the street in the surrounding area raised by Council staff. If the proposed amendment was known at that time, the project would have been amended and the design changed to delete the proposed dwellings with no off street car spaces. The marketing of these two allotments has proven extremely difficult now that the proposed amendments are known and as a consequence the end sale value is likely to be reduced substantially. Any existing premises in this circumstance is also likely to suffer a devaluation at the time of resale. 3. Questionable rationale - It is hard to understand the reasoning for the proposed amendment. On the Have Your Say webpage, the only rationale for the amendment is provided in the Parking Permits_1 pdf which states: “Administrative amendments are required to provide clarity and define eligibility criteria. The following subordinate local law amendments will assist customers when applying for resident and visitor parking permits. It is proposed to: • permit eligibility where a minimum of six metres clear legal parking space measured along the kerbside frontage of the detached premises land (i.e. the measurement excludes driveways, bus stops, yellow lines, etc.) • allow owners of vehicles to authorise persons to apply for a parking permit at the driver’s residential address (e.g. company owned vehicles driven by residents) • restrict permit eligibility to premises that do not contain businesses (i.e. used for home based business).” This is not at all a rationale, and appears disingenuous when it is not assisting at all, but taking away and restricting rights. It is questioned whether the real reason for this amendment is the Envi and Garden Terrace projects which are innovative housing typologies, offering real choice of housing pricing and lifestyle choice, but do threaten the existing paradigm in relation to on street and off street car parking. If this is the real reason for the amendment, it is suggested that the amendment is not the correct approach, rather it should be addressed through the planning approval process. 4. Impact of the amendment - By inspecting property information for the Southport Traffic Area it appears that: o There are a limited number of detached premises that have a kerb frontage of less than 6m and o The Envi and Garden Terrace projects may be the only ones with detached premises that have both no off street parking and a kerb space less than 6m. Other Traffic Areas have not been studied in detail but from local knowledge it is also likely that: o In places like Varsity Lakes there will be a number of detached premises with less than 6m kerb space (e.g. The Quay and The Landing) but o There may be very few, if any, that have no off street parking and a kerb space less than 6m. Consequently the application of the amendment now will affect a small number of residents, but significantly affect them, while, application of the amendment to future approvals would not mean that a significant number of premises are ‘grandfathered’. Recommendation: As the impact of the proposed amendment prohibiting resident parking permit approvals for detached premises with a kerb frontage less than 6m takes away existing rights, is financially detrimental and is likely to impact upon a relatively minor number of premises, it is recommended that: • Either that amendment is not applied to those detached premises that have no off street parking provisions or • That it be put in place from a point in time in the future to ‘grandfather’ the current existing detached dwellings and detached dwelling approvals.

Indooroopilly 4068 On behalf of While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Visitor Financial Interest Not applicable Not answered Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Owner of Southport implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No INDOOROOPILLY, QLD 2000187 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 145 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 Q3 (Do you support the proposed Q3 (Do you support amendments to the the proposed Q3 (Do you support Resident parking amendments to the the proposed permits?) Resident's Q4 (Your submission Q1 (Do you wish to Q2 (Your submission Q2 (Your submission Resident parking amendments to the Event parking permit - Q4 (Your submission about Resident's Event Q4 (Your submission make a submission about Resident parking about Resident parking permits?) Multi- Resident parking (Main Beach, Robina about Resident's Event parking permits affects about Resident's Event regarding any of the permits affects you permits affects you residential Premises permits?) Detached Stadium and (Carrara) parking permits affects you because:) parking permits affects above Resident because:) Multi- because:) Detached Resident / Visitor Premises Resident / Stadium Residential you because:) Robina (Carrara) Stadium you because:) Main Q5 (Please ensure your comments relate to Resident parking permits for this submission and are supported by the grounds (reasons for your submission) and the facts and circumstances (the evidence for your reasons). (Please indicate which Resident parking permit Changes parking permit types?) residential Premises Premises parking permit Visitor parking permit Traffic Areas) Stadium Traffic Area Residential Traffic Area Beach Traffic Area (s) your submission relates to.)) Submission Consideration by City Officers Recommended Q23 (Suburb) Customer's property has limited off-street parking, are not currently eligible for an on- street parking permit due to a parking restrictions on the street and they will not be eligible under the proposed amendments. It is not possible to amend the law for individual situations. With the demand on the Gold Coast parking system continuing to grow as permanent and visitor populations increase, the parking permit scheme is Yes Financial Interest Visitor Not applicable Support Not answered Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Refer to attachment iSpot # designed to best manage parking for the City as a whole. No BILINGA, QLD 2000208 We are a Town Planning Consultancy, interested in potential conflict that the parking policy presents with respect to the City Plan through effectively making some forms of small lot affordable housing unviable

Yes Financial Interest Financial Interest Not applicable Oppose Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Refer to iSpot # to view the remainder of this submission Planning matters No SOUTHPORT, QLD 2000250 We are the Body Corporate Managers for Body Corporate for and write to you in that capacity. We have been advised by the Chairperson of the above complex that the GCCC is proposing changes to the Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No 1) 2019. The information as conveyed to us is that: a) Any parking permits will require the holder to park on the same side of the road as the premises and park immediately outside the subject property, and Customer's property has limited off-street parking, are not currently eligible for an on- b) That the property must have available parking space of not less than 6 meters. street parking permit due to a parking restrictions on the street and they will not be Your records will show that this property has a major bus stop immediately outside, such that all of the frontage on the southern side of their driveway is taken up by the Council bus stop. There is a small parking space which overlaps with the adjacent property on the northern side of their driveway however one eligible under the proposed amendments. It is not possible to amend the law for space is unavailable on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays - between 7am - 11am - due to it being a collection area of refuse containing wheelie bins belonging to the adjacent ·property. There is no provision for parking on Common Property and Body Corporate By-laws forbid parking on the driveway. · individual situations. With the demand on the Gold Coast parking system continuing to Consequently, owners/occupiers at will have no ability to park any extra vehicles on the street beyond the permissible 4 hours. This represents a severe disadvantage to owners/residents. We respectfully request that provision be made to allow these grow as permanent and visitor populations increase, the parking permit scheme is Yes Financial Interest Visitor Not applicable Oppose Not answered Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable owners/residents to park, with an appropriate non chargeable permit, on the opposite side of . We shall await your serious consideration on this issue. designed to best manage parking for the City as a whole. No BILINGA, QLD 2000269 Visitors Parking Permit . I have held a Visitors Parking Permit for a number of years having been in for over years. at is unique having been built as the first mixed use building on the Gold Coast. It is bound on three sides by roads. Fronting and having two ground floor foyer entrances, one in and one in . They are both narrow one way streets and the yellow lines are adjacent to the building with adjacent to a narrow pedestrian ( ). There are limited parking metered spaces on the other side of the road with a pedestrian path. I have held and used the ‘visitors parking permit’ for a number of years for our visitors without any problems having had which restricted use to only. The new permit number is . There are only two residences remaining in of the original residences and offices. We have not applied for a residents Parking Permit over the years of being a resident preferring to use a VPP. is a narrow one way street with parking bays, loading and disabled bay on the southern side of the Road with the yellow no parking line adjacent to our building as it does in which whilst not a through road it traverses the Carpark with a narrow exit into . is very narrow and has limited parking and where students are always on the road during their breaks, causing a traffic hazard as they appear not to have adequate student facilities on site. We have a magnificent row of date palm trees adjacent to the building (on Council’s reserve) which limits the access for both vehicles and pedestrians through this street. was built years ago. I have been happy to pay the $80 per year for the convenience of a VPP for our visitors and would like the opportunity to do so in the future for 2020 and beyond. I would consider that we have a special and unique case and situation as we do not have any two hour parking on street unless you are some distance away negating the intent of having Visitor Parking in the same street as the building and residence, and that would be against the conditions of the permit as it was before being changed last year when we were presented with two infringement notices, which council subsequently withdrew after submitting an objection as nothing had changed. I would like to continue to have a VPP for our unit as it is still a residence in a commercial mixed use building and there are not many options in the area for the intended use of providing a single visitors permit for While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Financial Interest Not answered Not answered Support Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered our building. I would ask that this be taken into special consideration in Council's review of the Local Law, and we look forward to being invited to make application again for a VPP in 2020. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No SOUTHPORT, QLD 2000298 My property is defined as Multi Residential. However, there are only attached dwellings all fronting Varsity Lakes, and not in a high rise building or gated estate. We are on the community tile scheme known as , which is made up of dwellings. Because we are defined as a Multi Residential Dwelling ( not a detached dwelling) we are unable to obtain a Residential Parking Permit. The laws for the Parking Permit Scheme do not incorporate our building type/ definition. We should be able to receive a residential parking permit, as are the single dwellings and other attached dwellings in our While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Financial Interest Visitor Not applicable Support Not answered Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable scheme plus be able to purchase a visitor parking permit. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network No VARSITY LAKES, QLD 2000314 The property in which I have an interest is a property approved on 6th June 2007. It comprises more than 20 units and so does not comply with a Multi Residential Definition, nor is it a “ Detached Dwelling’, therefore this local law seemingly does not address the Regulated Parking imposed within Customer's property has limited off-street parking, are not currently eligible for an on- its curtilage by allowing a Permit to be issued, irrespective of any other conditions, in a manner which complies with the Town Page 5 of 7 Planning requirements of the development.. The Town Planning Permits identifies a number of “on street parking spaces “which are to be made available as follow; section 8 street parking permit due to a parking restrictions on the street and they will not be refers to; "All parking spaces shall be provided———— so as to be freely accessible to accommodate the vehicles of residents of the site”, and section 9 refers to "vehicles of persons employed on the site during the time the development is open for business and those of bona fide visitors for the duration of any eligible under the proposed amendments. It is not possible to amend the law for visit to the site” The Local Law is in conflict with the Town Planning approval for this development and prevents the residents from accessing parking which the council requires to be “freely available” I therefore suggest that a new category of permit be utilised that allows the regulated parking to continue, and the individual situations. With the demand on the Gold Coast parking system continuing to residents to be able to avail themselves of the parking which the “Town Planning Approval” requires to be provided and to be “freely available” This permit, I suggest 2 unlimited resident/visitor per dwelling, and 2 business hours employee permits, would be available at no cost to all land owners in such grow as permanent and visitor populations increase, the parking permit scheme is Yes Financial Interest Visitor Not applicable Support Not answered Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable developments, supporting the conditions outlined by the Town Planning Approval. designed to best manage parking for the City as a whole. VARSITY LAKES, QLD 2000319 The City is presently fulfilling its statutory obligation to publically consult on changes to parking permit laws. During the public consultation, it has come to my attention the local law may not accommodate at least one specific circumstance. I am advised, the original development approval for on requires that parking along the frontage and all internal roads must remain freely available to residents, their visitors and genuine trades. While signposting these areas as “No Limit” may deal with this issue, it would undermine the amenity of locals who were amongst the original agitators for the introduction of the regulated traffic area. A sensible solution may be that the adopted local law guarantees parking permits for all occupants (maybe two?) where a development approved prior to the introduction of the local law includes guaranteed access to on street parking. I would appreciate if While this submission does not support the proposed changes they are being Yes Visitor Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered Not answered this email is taken as a formal submission into the local law making process and given due consideration. implemented to ensure safe and efficient use of the road network VARSITY LAKES, QLD 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 146 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 Q10 (Do you support Q6 (Do you wish to the proposed new Q10 (Do you support Q11 (Does the make a submission in Q7 (Do you support Q8 (Do the changes to Community Service the proposed new proposed new relation to one of the the proposed the Eligible parking permits?) Community Service Residential Care Q13 (Please ensure your comments relate to Community Service parking permits for this Community Service amendments to the Organisation parking Residential Care parking permits?) Service and / or Carers submission only and are supported by the grounds (reasons for your submission) and the facts parking permits Eligible Organisation permit affect you Service (new) parking Carers parking permit parking permit affect and circumstances (the evidence for your reasons). (Please indicate which Community Service Changes above?) parking permit?) because:) Q9 (Please specify) permit (new) you because:) Q12 (Please specify) parking permit (s) your submission relates to.)) Submission Consideration by City Officers Recommended Q23 (Suburb) I work for and provide direct patient care in clients homes. Yes Support Have / May use this permit Support Not answered Are a carer Street parking restrictions have always been an issue, especially < 30min parking zones. Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No LABRADOR, QLD Yes Support Not applicable Support Support May use a carer May use as carer Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No SOUTHPORT, QLD Organisations like Surf Life Saving who have volunteers should be automatically allowed to park, without applying. Same goes for other emergency service vehicles. Otherwise it will end up like Byron Bay where I was one hour late This submission does not relate directly to the proposed TAPPS changes. However, Yes Support Have / May use this permit Support Support Not applicable because I had to park a long way from the Surf Club. This puts people's lives in danger. feedback provided will be considered during future parking reviews No KINGSCLIFF, NSW Yes Support Other, Please Specify Support Support Other, please specify People need carers and carers need access to their clients! Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No ROBINA, QLD Yes Oppose Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable I agree that carers should have access to close parking . Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No MERMAID WATERS, QLD Yes Oppose Not applicable Oppose Not answered Other, please specify As above As above Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No NERANG, QLD

Council should not be trying to enforce parking rather encourage more private sector engagement to relieve parking Yes Support Have / May use this permit Support Support Are a carer congestion without costing the rate payer and subsidising those parking charges so they are low and affordable to all. Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No LABRADOR, QLD a Not for Profit organization This would affect my work with as my roll is non paid meeting take place all over Not for profit Organization Meeting take place all over the Gold Coast. My Roll as for Yes Not answered Not answered Not applicable Not applicable Other, please specify the Gold Coast is not a paid roll. We run on a very low Budget. Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No BURLEIGH HEADS, QLD It is an identified community need for this type of parking permit. This is an identified It is an identified community Yes Support Other, Please Specify community need Support Support Other, please specify need (This question is not user-friendly e.g. use of language and volume of words). Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No TUGUN, QLD

i am aware of the need for this type of permit especially Yes Support Have / May use this permit Support Support Other, please specify for unpaid carers .. Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No

Working in the sector of disability, ongoing meetings and appointments to support others living with a disability. Attending functions with others with a disability, living in a building Yes Support Have / May use this permit Support Support Other, please specify with limited parking space. Assisting and transporting participants living with disability. Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD

Regarding Organisational and carers parking permit- in my role as an , I visit clients who are blind or have low vision at their home and teach them skills to mobilise safely inside their homes and from their home to locations within their residential area. Currently, partway through a lesson I need to stop the lesson to move the car. Also, if we are outdoors in unfamiliar areas to the client, I have to guide the client back to a familiar area/safety, usually back to their residence, move the car, then guide them back out to the training area. Sometimes it is difficult to get Yes Support Have / May use this permit Support Support Are a carer back to the car in time when supporting clients who are slow paced or have a physical disability. Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No MORAYFIELD, QLD Ageing in your home Community Service Parking permits as stated although these days some small business & related home and health I support the important work requires access from health services could be considered to be performing a community service for a small fee.?? of eligible organizations and care professionals and Yes Support Other, Please Specify their need for access. Support Support Other, please specify emergency services Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No ELANORA, QLD My carer may ride a motor Yes Oppose Have / May use this permit Support Oppose Other, please specify bike Carers parking permit (new) Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No MERMAID BEACH, QLD When I am neede to support someone - I dont not think I should have to leave them- unsupported to go out and move Yes Support Have / May use this permit Support Support May use a carer my car every time the allocated parking time is up. Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No TUGUN, QLD Carers parking permit (new) Yes Support Have / May use this permit Not applicable Support May use a carer Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No HOLLYWELL, QLD It makes so much sense, when you are a carer and attending various appointments which do not always run to schedule and you are waiting sometimes with an already anxious/ frustrated child and you are worrying about the time Yes Support Have / May use this permit Not applicable Support Are a carer you have left on the parking meter. Extending the parking time would alleviate problems. Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No Disability parking permit Disability parking permit is a Disability parking permit at Disability parking permit for disabled people Yes Support Other, Please Specify good way Support Support Other, please specify the library is available Use for deaf people with mobility Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No SOUTHPORT, QLD I am a carer and the changes would be very Yes Support Other, Please Specify beneficial Not answered Support Are a carer this is a great initiative Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No HELENSVALE, QLD This is a great idea. The only parking infringements I have incurred is because I was under 10 mins overtime on a Yes Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Support Are a carer meter due to my sons mobility issues and we don’t have a disabled sticker. Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No PACIFIC PINES, QLD Yes Oppose Have / May use this permit Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable No Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No ROBINA, QLD

i have a severely disabled brother and organise his care. My only caution is that the system is not abused, and used by people who get permits to use for their personal gain. but this is not GCC Council's fault. But enforcement and regulation Yes Support Other, Please Specify is important Support Support May use a carer use carer services Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No COOLANGATTA, QLD Yes Support Not applicable Not applicable Support Are a carer I am a carer and work with ahed care and disability clients all the time Based on feedback in this submission the proposed changes are supported No PARKWOOD, QLD

Being the holder of a disability parking permit, I strongly disagree with the addition of a carer's parking permit. Whether or not a Carer is doing business on behalf of the person they care for is beside the point. The point of a designated disability parking space is to provide relief for the disabled person when they are visiting areas. When you have a disability, you need ease of access to certain areas and the disabled parking bays are for this very reason. I can't see why an able bodied carer would need to take a disabled parking bay, when they themselves are not suffering with any physical impairment. It can be extremely challenging due to the limited supply. This amendment would just I am the holder of a place more strain on an already strained supply. Unless you suffer from physical impairment you cannot possibly Yes Oppose Not applicable Oppose Oppose Other, please specify Disability Parking Permit understand the unique challenges. I don't know who came up with this idea and why, but it is so wrong. Comment/s not relevant. No PACIFIC PINES, QLD Yes Support Not answered Not answered Not answered May use a carer 0 no information provided Comment/s not relevant or objectionable. No SOUTHPORT, QLD 2000298 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 147 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 Q15 (Do you wish to Q16 (Do you support Q17 (Do you support Q18 (Do the Q20 (Please ensure your comments relate to Commercial Use parking permits make a submission in the proposed the proposed amendments to the only for this submission and are supported by the grounds (reasons for your relation to one of the amendments to the amendments to the Commercial Use submission) and the facts and circumstances (the evidence for your reasons). above Commercial Use Temporary parking Works Zone parking parking permits affect Q19 (If other, please (Please indicate which Commercial Use parking permit (s) your submission Changes parking permits?) permit?) permit?) you because: ) specify.) relates to.)) Submission Consideration by City Officers Recommended Q23 (Suburb) future Building extension Yes Support Support Other workers may require Future contractors Submission supports proposed amending law No SOUTHPORT, QLD It limits residents being able to have trades people or careers at our homes whenever we Yes Support Support Other It effects peoples jobs! need them!! Submission supports proposed amending law No ROBINA, QLD Resident but feel for the tradies who have to keep moving their cars when they are only trying to do their Yes Not Applicable Support Other jobs Tradies need to use their time to continue their jobs not to keep moving their cars around Submission supports proposed amending law No Yes Support Support Other Disability sector Assisting and or transporting participants in the community Submission does not relate to Commercial Permits No SURFERS PARADISE, QLD

People must use disability parking permit Because people with hearing impaired are to use disability parking permit at all times Disability parking permit will This is a good opportunity but the other way is to Yes Support Not Applicable Other be used for disability people Use disability parking permit when out and about Submission does not relate to Commercial Permits No SOUTHPORT, QLD

Works Zones are required at construction/ building sites to facilitate the loading and unloading of materials immediately adjacent to the site for a period of one month or longer. Works Zones signs and line markings are implemented by the City and the Principal contractor is responsible for the use of the Works Zone.

A Temporary Parking Permit is to allow the permit holder to park one or more vehicles in regulated parking In relation to temporary parking, I have difficulty understanding how it is practical to obtain spaces for longer than the specified time on the official traffic sign for a period up to four weeks. The permit permits for subcontractors who come and go on a timetable that cannot be guaranteed holder is responsible for managing the use of the parking spaces specified in the Temporary Parking Permit. A builder in Sourthport and ahead of time, nor which companies will be used on each job until sometimes just before they Note: The permit is issued to the applicant and not individual vehicles. Yes Oppose Oppose Other concered re:subcontractors start. No INDOOROOPILLY, QLD 2000187 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 148 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) Attachment E SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT

TRAFFIC AREA AND PARKING PERMIT SCHEME (TAPPS)

JUNE 2019 – VERSION 5 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 149 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Version history

Document Author Comments Date version 1 Ali Bec Initial draft 25 June 2019

2 Skye Ross Edits 9 July 2019 3 Skye Ross Approvals 5 September 2019

Document distribution and approval

Name Title Action Signature Date (iSPOT#) 5 September Joe McCabe Chief Operating Office, OCOO Approve #74376676 2019

Policy Implementation and Community 5 September Chris Lynch Approve #74375630 Engagement Office, Office of the Mayor 2019 23 August Alison Ewens Director of Lifestyle and Community Approve #74295751 2019

19 August Alton Twine Director of Transport and Infrastructure Approve #74295860 2019 Manager, Health Regulatory & Lifeguard 22 August Rob Smith Approve #74295751 Services, LC 2019

Peter Jasper Acting Executive Coordinator City 22 August Approve #74295751 Standards, LC 2019 Amber Barratt Acting Senior Project & Compliance 20 August Approve #74295751 Officer, LC 2019 15 August Matthew Tilly Manager of Traffic and Transport Approve #74295860 2019 Coordinator Transport Policy and 08 August Andy Stewart Approve #74295860 Planning 2019 20 August Anthony Papa Specialist Transport Planner Approve #74265643 2019 Executive Coordinator Corporate Nicole Waters CC Only Communication, OCOO Coordinator Marketing, Communication Bernice Jones Approve #73949348 10 July 2019 and Engagement, OCOO Account Officer Community Skye Ross Approve #73934925 9 July 2019 Engagement, OCOO Nicole Jensen Account Officer T&I, OCOO Approve #73927181 8 July 2019

Marketing and Communications Officer, Jess Roberts Endorse #73927181 8 July 2019 T& I

Community Engagement and Research Ali Bec Endorse #73927222 8 July 2019 Officer, OCOO

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 2 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 150 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Table of Contents

1 Executive summary ...... 4 1.1 Engaged participants ...... 4 1.2 Key Findings ...... 4 1.3 GC have your say analytics ...... 4 1.4 Report considerations ...... 5 2 Project background ...... 6 3 Community engagement objectives ...... 6 4 Communication strategy ...... 6 4.1 Key messages ...... 7 4.2 Marketing and communication of the engagement ...... 7 4.2.1 Public notice ...... 7 4.2.2 City Panel ...... 7 4.2.3 Social media ...... 8 4.2.4 City channels ...... 9 4.2.5 Advertising (Print media) ...... 10 4.2.6 Community stakeholder engagement...... 11 5 Submission results ...... 12 5.1 Traffic Areas...... 12 5.1.1 Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct ...... 13 5.1.2 Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Area...... 14 5.1.3 Southern Traffic Area ...... 15 5.1.4 Southport Traffic Area ...... 16 5.2 Parking Permits ...... 17 5.2.1 Multi-Residential Resident / Visitor parking permit ...... 17 5.2.2 Detached Premises Resident / Visitor parking permit ...... 17 5.2.3 Resident’s Event parking permit ...... 18 5.2.4 Community Service parking permit ...... 19 5.2.5 Commercial Use parking permit ...... 20 Appendix A – Community engagement tools ...... 22 GC have your say home page ...... 22 GC have your say project page ...... 23 Online submission forms (Traffic Areas and Parking Permits) ...... 24 Appendix B – Email notification to City Panel ...... 31 Appendix C – Location results ...... 32 Traffic Areas ...... 32 Parking Permits ...... 33

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 3 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 151 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

1 Executive summary City of Gold Coast (City) undertook community engagement for the proposed Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019. The proposed changes are in relation to the Traffic Area and Parking Permit Scheme (TAPPS). TAPPS is aimed at managing overflow parking in residential areas close to commercial and special use precincts and focuses on freeing up on-street spaces for residents and short to medium term visitors. The engagement period ran from 1 June 2019 to 24 June 2019. This report provides a summary of the engagement, marketing and communication activities undertaken and the feedback received.

1.1 Engaged participants

A total of 550 respondents provided 2201 responses:

• 1892 responses were received for traffic areas • 297 responses were received for parking permits • 12 additional responses were received requesting consideration for individual circumstances relating to the engagement topic.

1.2 Key Findings

Traffic Areas – of the 1892 responses, the following percentages apply to the responses in support or opposition of the proposed changes: • Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct – 81% support, 19% oppose • Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Area – 64% support, 36% oppose • Southern Traffic Area – 64% support, 36% oppose • Southport Traffic Area – 80% support, 20% oppose.

Parking Permits – of the 297 responses, the following percentages apply to the responses in support or opposition of the proposed changes:

• Multi-residential Premises Resident / Visitor parking permit – 59% support, 41% oppose • Detached Premises Resident / Visitor parking permit – 42% support, 58% oppose • Resident’s Event parking permit for each of the three traffic areas – 44% support, 56% oppose • Community Service permit for each of the three types (Eligible Organisation, Residential Care Service Provider & Carers) – 84% support, 16% oppose • Commercial permit for the two types (Temporary and Work Zone) – 67% support, 33% oppose.

1.3 GC have your say analytics

• 5436 aware participants – visited at least one page on the site • 3046 informed participants – visited multiple pages, viewed images and contributed • 527 engaged participants – responded to the survey (not including hardcopy submissions) • 1,765 downloads for Traffic Area boundary maps and Frequently Asked Questions • 808 downloads for Parking Permits guide • 527 downloads for Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No 1) 2019

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 4 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 152 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

• 79 new GC have your say registrations.

1.4 Report considerations

The responses to this survey provide an indication of community views among residents and visitors on the amended traffic area boundaries and parking permits. They are not a randomly selected representative sample. The structure of the survey consisted of four individual Traffic Areas and five Parking Permits. Thus, the number of respondents for each unique Traffic Area or Parking Permit was low as they referred to very specific areas and stakeholder groups.

The GC have your say analytics found a high percentage of participants to be engaged through the provision of information, demonstrating visitors to the site to be well informed. Providing extensive information allowed participants to make an informed decision regarding their position as a stakeholder of the engagement and ultimately if they felt it necessary to make a submission.

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 5 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 153 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

2 Project background On 30 October 2018, Council resolved (TI18.1018.004) to implement Stage 2 of the proposed Traffic Area and Parking Permit Scheme (TAPPS) changes and endorsed the proposed amendments to the Traffic Area boundaries and Parking Permit Scheme for inclusion into Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006.

The Agenda item to propose the subordinate local law amendments was presented to the Events, Tourism & Governance Committee on 23 May 2019 and to Council on 28 May 2019. The documents presented with the Agenda item included:

• Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No.1) 2019 (the “proposed subordinate local law”) • Copy of the existing Subordinate Local Law No 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006 (with the proposed tracked amendments) • The anti-competitive provisions consideration.

The proposed law amends Subordinate Local Law No.2 (Regulated Parking) 2006.

There are no anti-competitive provisions included in the proposed subordinate local law. The purpose of the amending law is to:

• amend existing Resident and Visitor Parking Permit Scheme • amend the Special Parking Permit criteria • include Road Closure Permit changes • include Carer Parking Permit criteria • amend existing traffic area boundaries • include additional off-street regulated parking areas in Schedule 2 – Part 1 • amend off-street regulated parking areas in Schedule 2 – Part 3.

3 Community engagement objectives The community engagement objectives of this project were to:

• inform the community of the proposed Traffic Area boundary and parking permit changes • provide the community with online copies of the proposed changes • invite the community to comment on the proposed changes.

4 Communication strategy This was a city-wide community engagement. The primary target audiences were:

• residents within Traffic Area • carers working across the Gold Coast • businesses in and commuting to traffic areas • tradespersons working in traffic areas • motorists parking in traffic areas.

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 6 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 154 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

4.1 Key messages

General engagement messages included:

• encouraging the community to have their say on the proposed subordinate local law changes via the GC Have Your Say website. Community consultation opened on 1 June 2019 and closed on 24 June 2019 • proposed amendments: - introduced carers permits to allow unpaid carers and carers from registered carer organisations to park for extended times in non-paid parking spaces - reviewed Traffic Area boundaries to ensure they reflect current and future parking demands of the areas. Based on parking needs, community and divisional Councillor feedback, we proposed to reduce the Southport and Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Areas and increase Robina Stadium (for events only) and Southern Traffic Areas to reflect parking needs of those areas - noted the community’s concerns with the criteria around multi-residential developments and proposed to increase the 20-residence cap to a 30-residence cap for the Southport and Central Traffic Areas.

Refer to #73211426 for detailed key messages.

4.2 Marketing and communication of the engagement

Parking is a contentious topic that often attracts negative media and community concern. Due to the nature of this engagement, more comprehensive marketing and communication was undertaken to ensure the City was remaining open and transparent with the proposed changes. This included advertising through social media, City channels, print, community stakeholder engagement and communication through the City Panel. This activity reached 272,457 people and received 8424 click throughs to the GC have your say survey. Key results from the campaign include:

• City panel – reach 20,470 people, 2183 click throughs to the survey • Social media – reach 77,824 people, 5827 click throughs to the survey • City channels – reach 86,178 residents, 414 click throughs • Print publications – total reach of 87,985.

4.2.1 Public notice

Under the Local Government Act 2009 and in accordance with Council’s 2016-Process for Making-Subordinate Local Laws resolved GA16.0303.19, an advertisement appeared in the Gold Coast Bulletin inviting public submission for a 21 day period. The notification appeared in the form of a pointer advertisement in the Gold Coast Bulletin on Saturday 1 June 2019.

4.2.2 City Panel

The survey was distributed to the GC have your say City Panel on 4 June 2019. The City Panel is a database of participants who have registered to partake in City of Gold Coast engagements. An email (refer to Appendix B) was sent to 20,470 City Panel members. A total of 18,490 (90.3%) were successfully delivered, 8461 (41.3%) were opened, and 2183 (10.7%) clicked on the survey link. Traffic sources by referring URL indicated that Facebook on a mobile device was the highest referral.

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 7 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 155 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

4.2.3 Social media The social media campaign was aimed at engaging with residents living, working or travelling to traffic areas around the city. A total of 77,824 people were reached (173,626 impressions) with 5,827 people clicking through to the survey.

A combination of humorous creative and standard hero imagery was used to drive behaviour change and also to communicate the controversial parking messages. Both creative examples achieved good reach, click throughs and engagement, however some of the humorous creative sparked negative commentary. Throughout the campaign we tweaked imagery and copy to ensure we were constantly on top of reactive social commentary in order to achieve the best outcome for the engagement.

Key findings:

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 8 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 156 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

• Facebook posts received high engagement by men and women aged 18-34, however, women 55+ and men 55-64 were most likely to take action and click through to the GC have your say website. • Ads that contained more details around the specific changes attracted less negative comments as they stopped people from making unnecessary assumptions. • The campaign saw 82 shares of the posts, showing there is an interest amongst the community in having their say on important topics that affect them, friends/family. • The most effective and top performing post by number of link clicks and awareness was the ‘spare a few minutes’ ad using hero imagery. The post received 2879 link clicks and a reach of 45,824.

4.2.4 City channels City channels were used to communicate to Gold Coast ratepayers. The web banners and MREC (medium rectangle advertisement within in-app content) received 79 click throughs and engaged with 70,544 residents. The most engaging content was the MREC.

3 Jun to 9 Jun 10 June to 16 June

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 9 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 157 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

17 Jun to 23 June

Awareness through the Gold Coast Weekly newsletter was quite good reaching 15,643 people. The consultation was mentioned in three editions 7 June, 14 June and 21 June achieving a total of 335 click throughs. The first week achieved the most engagement. Inclusion in the Gold Coast Weekly newsletter was beneficial. Subscribers have a genuine interest in the City and are likely to take action.

4.2.5 Advertising (Print media) Print publications were used to target residents in key traffic areas. The Gold Coast Sun Southern and Gold Cost Sun Central ran for one week commencing 19 June and achieved a total reach of 87,985.

GC Sun – Southern Edition, page 4 GC Sun Central Edition, page 2 Circulation – 49,830 Circulation – 38,155

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 10 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 158 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

4.2.6 Community stakeholder engagement

The below postcard was distributed to key stakeholder groups and residents in Traffic Areas including City Libraries, Councillor offices, community centres and community members living in the Southern Traffic Area.

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 11 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 159 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

5 Submission results Quantitative and qualitative data was collected from the GC have your say engagement. Fifteen duplicate submissions were received where respondents participated in either engagement more than once. Each submission response was reviewed and only one submission was accepted per person. In some instances submissions were identical and other submissions were merged to create one submission. Seven emails were received providing feedback on the engagement topic, and were included as formal submissions.

A total of 550 unique submissions were received, resulting in 1892 Traffic Area responses and 297 Parking Permit responses.

Respondents’ level of support for the proposed changes was identified, as well as the reasons for being affected by the changes. ‘Other’ groups for this category included people who owned businesses in or near the traffic area, residents of areas adjacent to the traffic area and Gold Coast rate payers, among others.

The quantitative results from the Traffic Area and Parking Permit responses are presented within this document.

5.1 Traffic Areas

A total of 1892 responses were received regarding the following traffic areas: • Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct • Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Area • Southern Traffic Area • Southport Traffic Area.

The following figures represent the total number of responses in support or opposition of the changes to the four Traffic Areas: • Resident responses – 71 responses received - 94% support, 6% oppose • Commuter responses - 145 responses received - 72% support, 28% oppose • Visitor responses - 166 responses received - 69% support, 31% oppose.

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 12 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 160 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

5.1.1 Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct

For the Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct, the results found that 281 responses supported the proposed changes, whilst 67 opposed the changes and 125 did not comment on this traffic area.

300 Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct

250

200

150 281

100 Number of of Number responses

125 50 67

0 Support Oppose No comment

The following figures represent the total number of responses in support or opposition of the changes regarding the Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct Traffic Area: • Resident responses – 85 responses received - 94% support, 6% oppose

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 13 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 161 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

• Commuter responses - 63 responses received - 72% support, 28% oppose • Visitor responses - 77 responses received - 72% support, 28% oppose.

5.1.2 Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Area

For the Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Area, the results found that 148 responses supported the proposed changes, whilst 83 opposed the changes and 242 did not comment on this traffic area.

300 Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Area

250

200

150

242 100 Number of of Number responses 148 50 83

0 Support Oppose No Comment

The following figures represent the total number of responses in support or opposition of the changes regarding the Robina Stadium (Event) Traffic Area:

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 14 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 162 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

• Resident responses - 26 responses received - 31% support, 69% oppose • Commuter responses - 33 responses received - 55% support, 45% oppose • Visitor responses - 53 responses received - 57% support, 43% oppose.

5.1.3 Southern Traffic Area

For the Southern Traffic Area, results found that 149 responses supported the proposed changes, whilst 84 opposed the changes and 240 did not comment on this traffic area.

300 Southern Traffic Area

250

200

150 240 100

Number of of Number respones 149 50 84

0 Support Oppose No Comment

The following figures represent the total number of responses in support or opposition of the changes regarding the Southern Traffic Area: • Resident responses - 19 responses received - 53% support, 47% oppose • Commuter responses - 20 responses received - 35% support, 65% oppose • Visitor responses - 43 responses received - 56% support, 44% oppose. iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 15 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 163 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

5.1.4 Southport Traffic Area

For the Southport Traffic Area, the results found that 279 responses supported the proposed changes, whilst 69 opposed the changes and 125 did not comment on this traffic area.

300 Southport Traffic Area

250

200

150 279

100 Number of of Number responses

125 50 69

0 Support Oppose No Comment

The following figures represent the total number of responses in support or opposition of the changes regarding the Southport Traffic Area: • Resident responses - 100 responses received - 90% support, 10% oppose • Commuter responses - 82 responses received - 74% support, 26% oppose • Visitor responses - 84 responses received - 74% support, 26% oppose.

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 16 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 164 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

5.2 Parking Permits

A total of 297 responses were received across the five parking permit categories: • Multi-residential Resident / Visitor • Detached Premises Resident / Visitor • Resident Event (Robina, Carrara and Main Beach) • Community Services (Eligible Organisation, Residential Care Service and Carers) • Commercial Use (Temporary Parking and Work Zone).

5.2.1 Multi-Residential Resident / Visitor parking permit

For the Multi-Residential Premises Resident / Visitor parking permit, the results found that 22 responses supported the proposed amendments, 15 opposed the amendments, and 29 stated that the permit was not applicable or did not respond.

35 Multi-Residential Resident / Visitor Parking Permit

15 29 10 22

Number of of Number responses 15 5

0 Support Oppose No Comment

The following figures represent the total number of responses in support or opposition of the changes regarding Multi- Residential Resident / Visitor parking permits: • Resident responses - 25 responses received - 74% support and 26% oppose • Financial interest responses - 11 responses received - 25% support and 75% oppose • Visitor responses - 8 responses received - 50% support and 50% oppose.

5.2.2 Detached Premises Resident / Visitor parking permit

For the Detached Premises Resident / Visitor parking permit, the results found that 18 responses supported the proposed amendments, 24 opposed the amendments, and 24 stated that the permit was not applicable or did not respond.

A total of 12 respondents identified as residents effected by the Detached Premises Resident / Visitor parking permit, 4 opposed and 8 supported the changes.

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 17 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 165 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

30 Detached Premises Resident / Visitor Parking Permit

24 24 10 18 Number of of Number responses

0 Support Oppose No Comment

The following figures represent the total number of responses in support or opposition of the changes regarding Detached Premises Resident / Visitor parking permits: • Resident responses - 20 responses received - 37% support and 63% oppose • Financial interest responses - 9 responses received - 100% oppose • Visitor responses - 11 responses - 70% support and 30% oppose.

5.2.3 Resident’s Event parking permit

Three Traffic Areas were considered for the Resident’s Event parking permit: Robina Stadium Traffic Area, (Carrara) Stadium Residential Traffic Area, and Main Beach Traffic Area. For all three traffic areas, the results found 11 responses supported the proposed amendments, 14 opposed the changes, 41 stated that the permit was not applicable or did not respond.

45 Resident's Event Parking Permits 40

20 41

15 Number of of Number responses 10 14 5 11

0 Support Oppose No Comment

The following figures represent the total number of responses in support or opposition of the changes regarding Resident Event parking permits for Robina, Carrara and Main Beach:

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 18 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 166 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Robina Stadium Traffic Area • Resident responses – 2 responses received – 50% support, 50% oppose • Commuter responses – 1 response received – 100% support • Visitor responses – 11 visitor responses received – 64% support, 36% oppose.

Carrara Stadium Traffic Area • Resident response – 1 response received – 100% oppose • Commuter responses – 1 response received – 100% support • Visitor responses – 9 responses received – 67% support, 33% oppose.

Main Beach Traffic Area • Resident responses – 4 responses received – 25% support and 75% oppose • Commuter responses – 2 responses received – 100% support • Visitor responses – 11 responses received – 56% support, 44% oppose.

5.2.4 Community Service parking permit Three parking permit types were considered under the Community Service permit consultation: Eligible Organisation, Residential Care Service, and Carers. For all three parking permit types, the results found 49 responses supported the proposed changes, 9 responses opposed the changes, and 17 responses stated that the permit was not applicable or did not respond. Of the responses relating to the Eligible Organisation parking permit, 11 responses stated the have or may have a requirement to use this permit. Of the responses relating to the Residential Care Service or Carers parking permit, 7 responses identified as being a Carer, and 5 responses identified as may have the need for a Carer.

60 Community Services Parking Permit

49 20 Number of of Number responses

10 17 9 0 Support Oppose No Comment

A total of 75 respondents replied to the consultation regarding Community Service parking permits for Eligible Organisations, Residential Care Services and Carers:

Eligible Organisation parking permit

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 19 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 167 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

• 11 have or may use a permit – 82% support and 18% oppose the changes • 6 have identified ‘other’ as their motivator for contributing feedback – 100% support • 8 provided not applicable / no comment responses.

Residential Care Service parking permit • 7 carers – 43% support and 57% oppose the changes • 5 use carers – 60% support and 40% oppose the changes • 10 identified ‘other’ as their motivator for contributing feedback – 78% support and 22% oppose the changes • 3 not applicable / no comment responses.

Carers parking permit • 7 carers – 86% support and 14% oppose the changes • 5 use carers – 80% support and 20% oppose the changes • 10 identified ‘other’ as their motivator for contributing feedback – 75% support and 25% oppose the changes • 3 not applicable / no comment responses.

5.2.5 Commercial Use parking permit

Two parking permit types were considered under the Commercial Use permit consultation: Temporary parking permits and Work Zone parking permits. The results found that 8 responses supported the proposed changes, 2 opposed the changes and 2 stated that the permit was not applicable or did not respond.

9 Commercial Use Parking Permit 8

4 8

3 Number of of Number responses

1 2 2

0 Support Oppose No Comment

A total of 6 respondents replied to the consultation regarding Commercial Use parking permits for Temporary parking and Work Zones:

Temporary parking permit • 80% support the changes

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 20 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 168 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

• 20% oppose the changes.

Work Zone parking permit • 80% support the changes • 20% oppose the changes.

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 21 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 169 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Appendix A – Community engagement tools

GC have your say home page

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 22 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 170 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

GC have your say project page

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 23 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 171 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Online submission forms (Traffic Areas and Parking Permits)

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 24 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 172 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 25 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 173 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 26 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 174 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 27 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 175 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 28 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 176 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 29 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 177 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 30 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 178 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Appendix B – Email notification to City Panel

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 31 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 179 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Appendix C – Location results

Traffic Areas

The majority of responses (98%) to the Traffic Areas submissions were from Gold Coast residents. There were 6 responses (1.3%) from other Queensland suburbs and 3 responses (0.6%) from NSW suburbs. The other Queensland suburbs and NSW suburbs have been combined and categorised as ‘Non-Gold Coast’. Of the Gold Coast respondents 73.5% were from central suburbs, 10.6% from northern suburbs, 9.1% from southern suburbs and 4.8% from western suburbs. The top Gold Coast suburbs included Labrador, Southport and Parkwood.

400 Location 350 73.6%

300

250

200

150 Number of of Number responses 100

10.6% 9.1% 50 4.8% 1.9% 0 Central North South West Non-Gold Coast

100 Top 5 Gold Coast suburbs 90 18.7%

80 15.6%

12.6% 60

5.6%

Number of of Number respondents 30

20 2.8% 10

0 LABRADOR SOUTHPORT PARKWOOD ROBINA SURFERS PARADISE

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 32 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 180 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

Parking Permits

The majority of responses (85%) for the Parking Permit submissions were from Gold Coast residents. There were 4 responses (5%) from other Queensland suburbs, 1 response (1.3%) from NSW suburbs, and 1 response (1.3%) from Victorian suburbs. The other Queensland suburbs, NSW suburbs and Victorian suburbs have been combined and categorised as ‘Non-Gold Coast’. Of the Gold Coast respondents 62.5% were from central suburbs, 12.5% from southern suburbs, 5% from northern suburbs and 5% from western suburbs. The top Gold Coast suburbs included Southport and Surfers Paradise.

60 Location

62.5% 50

20 Number of of Number respondents

12.5% 10 7.5% 5% 5%

0 Central South North West Non-Gold Coast

18 21.3% Top 5 Gold Coast locations 16

12 12.5% 10

6 Number of of Number respondents 5% 5% 5% 4

0 SOUTHPORT SURFERS VARSITY LAKES ROBINA BROADBEACH PARADISE

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 33 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 181 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019

iSPOT #73793710 – TAPPS ENGAGEMENT AND MARKETING REPORT Page 34 of 34 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 182 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 LG222/365/02/02/01(P10) Attachment F

LIST OF LIKELY ANTI-COMPETITIVE PROVISIONS

Subordinate Local Law: Regulated Parking (Amendment) Subordinate Local Law (No. 1) 2019

Purpose: The purpose of the subordinate local law is to amend Subordinate Local Law No. 2 (Regulated Parking) 2006.

Anti-competitive Relevant Criteria Explanatory Comments Provisions No anti-competitive provision Not applicable Not applicable was identified in the proposed subordinate local law.

805190_1 #73224810

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 183 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) Attachment G SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 184 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 2 (Continued) MAKING OF REGULATED PARKING (AMENDMENT) Attachment G SUBORDINATE LOCAL LAW (NO. 1) 2019 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 185 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 3 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING – 26 AUGUST 2019 LG115/1190/04/20/CF(P1)

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY

Not Applicable.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Not Applicable.

3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

To present to Council the Audit Committee’s recommendations arising from its 2018-19 Draft Financial Statements meeting held on 26 August 2019.

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS

ETG19.0808.002 (in part) That Council adopt the recommendations of the Audit Committee determined at its meeting held on 22 July 2019 General Meeting as follows:

5 DISCUSSION

The Audit Committee (AC) met on 26 August 2019 to review and discuss the draft 2018-19 Financial Statements for the Council of the City of Gold Coast including its controlled entities along with a range of update reports since the last meeting in July 2019 in line with the Audit Committee Charter. The following reports/updates were provided by executive officers for review and consideration by committee members: . Draft 2018-19 Council of the City of Gold Coast financial statements; . Draft 2018-19 controlled entity financial statements; . Draft 2018-19 draft financial sustainability statements; . Asset valuations update; . Active infrastructure charges progress update; The meeting was also attended by representatives from the Queensland Audit Office (QAO) who discussed the matters noted in the QAO briefing paper including:

. Status of Milestones and deliverables; . Update on audit status and fees . Key audit matters specifically Infrastructure Assets valuation; . Recent reports to Parliament and sector related topical news; . Progress on other current Performance Audits.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 186 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 3 (Continued) AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING – 26 AUGUST 2019 LG115/1190/04/20/CF(P1)

The committee held robust discussions on a number of key matters requiring further action by management, and have requested additional updates from management prior to the final financial statement meeting scheduled for 23 September 2019. These matters included: . Review of the reported cumulative and annual indexation calculations for Infrastructure assets; . Timing of recognition of revenue in relation to contributed assets to be resolved between Corporate Finance and the QAO

The committee's specific recommendations resulting from their consideration of the above matters are included in the recommendations section of this report for resolution by Council.

The Audit Committee Register of Member Declarations and Other Position Disclosures was also reviewed and updated where necessary. The Audit Committee forward schedule and meeting dates for the remainder of 2019 were discussed and await confirmation following the issue of Council’s Meeting Planner.

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

The Audit Committee supports achievement of the following Corporate Plan 2020 outcomes: . We Manage the City Responsibly. . Our stewardship of the city provides value for money for ratepayers. . Program: Manage the short and long-term financial sustainability of the city through prudent financial management and ensuring value for money. . Program: Managing risk exposure faced by the City of Gold Coast, including ensuring a safe working environment and that “Work Health and Safety is everyone’s business”. 7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS

Budget/Funding Considerations . Funding for the operation of Council's Audit Committee was approved within Responsibility Centre CE8120 – Corporate Assurance, Budget Centre CE8120O008 - Audit Committee. Costs for Capital Works and Service Proposals . Not Applicable. In accordance with the budget review guidelines the following circumstances require referral to the Special Budget Committee . Not Applicable. People and Culture . Not Applicable.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 187 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 3 (Continued) AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING – 26 AUGUST 2019 LG115/1190/04/20/CF(P1)

8 RISK MANAGEMENT

Council's audit committee promotes good corporate governance through the provision of independent assurance, oversight and advice to Council and the Chief Executive Officer on matters relating to risk management, internal control, governance, compliance, audit and financial reporting.

9 STATUTORY MATTERS

Local Government Act 2009 Local Government Regulation 2012

10 COUNCIL POLICIES

Audit Committee Policy and Charter Internal Audit Policy and Charter

11 DELEGATIONS Not applicable 12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS

Directors and Council officers may need to respond to information requests from the Audit Committee as a result of this meeting.

14 TIMING

This report is being provided to the next available Council meeting following the Audit Committee meeting as required by legislation.

15 CONCLUSION

This written report of the deliberations and recommendations of the Audit Committee from its meeting of 26 August 2019 is provided to Council in accordance with section 211(1)(c) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for adoption.

The primary focus of this meeting was on the 2018-19 draft financial statements of Council and the controlled entities. As evidenced by the specific recommendations contained in this report, committee members have reviewed and considered a wide range of reports and engaged in robust discussions with Council management, internal auditors and external auditors, in order to satisfy themselves that a sound process has been undertaken to prepare Council’s draft 2018-19 draft financial statements.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 188 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 3 (Continued) AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING – 26 AUGUST 2019 LG115/1190/04/20/CF(P1)

Members of the committee reviewed and discussed the draft 2018-19 financial statements and concluded that they were appropriate to be provided to the external auditors, subject to a number of amendments discussed in the meeting. Members have also identified a number of specific matters identified in the report above where management has been requested to provide the committee with further information and progress updates prior to the next meeting where the 2018-19 financial statements are due to be finalised. The detailed recommendations of the committee are included in this report for the consideration of Council, and incorporate specific recommendations on matters where the Audit Committee members felt Council may appreciate additional comment. 16 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:

1 That Council adopt the recommendations of the Audit Committee determined at its meeting held on 26 August 2019 draft financial statements Meeting as follows: AC19.0826.001 –Member Declarations and Other Position Disclosures a The Audit Committee confirms the completeness and accuracy of the Register of Other Positions held by Independent External Audit Committee members subject to the following changes: i Mr Bill Turner advised he is no longer on a member of the Body Corporate Committee at Pavilions Residential Estate, Hope Island ii Mr Mitchell Petrie advised he is a consultant on a short term basis for KPMG. AC19.0826.002 - Minutes of Previous Audit Committee Meeting b The Audit Committee noted that the recommendations of its meeting held on 22 July 2019 were reported to the Events, Tourism and Governance Committee meeting on 8 August 2019 and Council’s subsequent meeting held on 13 August 2019. AC19.0826.003 – Audit Committee Action Requests Register Update c The Audit Committee notes the update on action requests arising from prior committee meetings. d The Audit Committee confirmed its strong view that a policy for Controlled Entities should be completed by 31 December 2019 in accordance with the commitment to the QAO. AC19.0826.004 – Active Infrastructure Charges Update e The Audit Committee notes the analysis and update of the status of the review of active infrastructure charges including the adoption of the revised revenue recognition policy. AC19.0826.005 – Asset Valuations Update f The Audit Committee notes the progress update on the 2019-20 revaluation activities. g The Audit Committee notes the final results of the 2018-19 Interim Revaluations subject to resolution of the matter of cumulative and annual indexation calculations. h The Audit Committee notes the 2018-19 responses to the QAO’s questions for management in reviewing asset valuations.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 189 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 3 (Continued) AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING – 26 AUGUST 2019 LG115/1190/04/20/CF(P1)

AC19.0826.006 – Contingent liabilities update i The Audit Committee notes the update from the City Solicitor in relation to Contingent Liabilities matters. AC19.0826.007 - External Audit Update j The Audit Committee notes the update from the Queensland Audit Office briefing paper on external audit for the 2018-19 financial statements and notes that the matter of timing of recognition of revenue in relation to contributed assets will be resolved between Corporate Finance and the QAO . AC19.0826.008 – 2018-19 Draft Financial Statements of Council of the City of Gold Coast k The Audit Committee notes they have reviewed the 2018-19 draft financial statements of Council of the City of Gold Coast as amended by Corporate Finance and subject to minor amendments advised by Committee members and approves provision of the draft financial statements to the external auditors on this basis. AC19.0826.009 - 2018-19 Draft Financial Sustainability Statements l The Audit Committee notes the draft 2018-19 draft financial sustainability statements and approves them being made available to the QAO subject to the changes arising from changes advised in relation to the Statement of Comprehensive Income and the completion of asset data in relation to the asset sustainability ratio AC19.0722.010 – Draft 2018-19 Financial Statements – Controlled Entities m The Audit Committee notes the draft 2018-19 Annual Financial Reports and Analytical Reviews submitted by Surfers Paradise Alliance Ltd, Broadbeach Alliance Ltd, Connecting Southern Gold Coast Ltd and HOTA Gold Coast Pty Ltd. AC19.0826.011 – Update on 2018-19 City of Gold Coast Insurance Company Limited n The Audit Committee notes the update in relation to the 2018-19 financial statements for City of Gold Coast Insurance Company Limited and that this matter will be further reviewed at the Committee’s September meeting. AC19.0826.012 – Audit Committee 2019 Meeting Dates and Forward Schedule o The Audit Committee notes the proposed Audit Committee meeting dates for the remainder of calendar year 2019 and proposed 2020 dates. p That the Audit Committee notes the Audit Committee Forward Schedule of standing and specifically requested reports expected at future meetings. AC19.0826.013 – Supplementary Information q The Audit Committee notes the supplementary information supplied relating to the 26 August 2019 meeting.

Author: Authorised by: Karen Farquhar Andrew Llewellyn Executive Coordinator Internal Audit Acting Chief Operating Officer 27 August 2019 # 74249166

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 190 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 3 (Continued) AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING – 26 AUGUST 2019 LG115/1190/04/20/CF(P1)

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.003 moved Cr Owen-Jones seconded Cr PC Young

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 191 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 3 (Continued) AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING – 26 AUGUST 2019 LG115/1190/04/20/CF(P1)

AC19.0826.008 – 2018-19 Draft Financial Statements of Council of the City of Gold Coast k The Audit Committee notes they have reviewed the 2018-19 draft financial statements of Council of the City of Gold Coast as amended by Corporate Finance and subject to minor amendments advised by Committee members and approves provision of the draft financial statements to the external auditors on this basis. AC19.0826.009 - 2018-19 Draft Financial Sustainability Statements l The Audit Committee notes the draft 2018-19 draft financial sustainability statements and approves them being made available to the QAO subject to the changes arising from changes advised in relation to the Statement of Comprehensive Income and the completion of asset data in relation to the asset sustainability ratio AC19.0722.010 – Draft 2018-19 Financial Statements – Controlled Entities m The Audit Committee notes the draft 2018-19 Annual Financial Reports and Analytical Reviews submitted by Surfers Paradise Alliance Ltd, Broadbeach Alliance Ltd, Connecting Southern Gold Coast Ltd and HOTA Gold Coast Pty Ltd. AC19.0826.011 – Update on 2018-19 City of Gold Coast Insurance Company Limited n The Audit Committee notes the update in relation to the 2018-19 financial statements for City of Gold Coast Insurance Company Limited and that this matter will be further reviewed at the Committee’s September meeting. AC19.0826.012 – Audit Committee 2019 Meeting Dates and Forward Schedule o The Audit Committee notes the proposed Audit Committee meeting dates for the remainder of calendar year 2019 and proposed 2020 dates. p That the Audit Committee notes the Audit Committee Forward Schedule of standing and specifically requested reports expected at future meetings. AC19.0826.013 – Supplementary Information q The Audit Committee notes the supplementary information supplied relating to the 26 August 2019 meeting.

CARRIED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 192 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1) Attachment 1 - City Operational Plan 2018-19: Performance Dashboard Quarter Four Attachment 2 - Gold Coast 2022: Performance Dashboard 2018-19 Attachment 3 - Performance Dashboard: Legend and Definitions

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY

Not Applicable.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Not Applicable.

3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

The City of Gold Coast Corporate Plan (Gold Coast 2022) was adopted by Council in June 2017 (effective from 1 July 2017) and a revised version was adopted by Council in December 2018 (effective from 7 December 2018). The City Operational Plan 2018-19 was adopted by Council 21 June 2018 and supports the delivery of Gold Coast 2022, City Strategies and delivery of City of Gold Coast services.

The Gold Coast 2022 and City Operational Plan 2018-19 Performance Report quarter four provides a performance assessment of:

. the implementation of the City Operational Plan initiatives 2018-19 . the implementation of the Gold Coast 2022 Signature Action initiatives 2018-19 and . progress towards achieving the outcomes of Gold Coast 2022.

This report is a legislative requirement under the Local Government Act 2009 and s174 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 that requires a written assessment of the progress towards implementing the annual operational plan. A report on progress of both the Operational Plan and Gold Coast 2022 will be included in the City of Gold Coast Annual Report, which is scheduled for adoption by Council in October 2019.

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS

Ex Minute G18.1207.016 – Adoption of Gold Coast 2022 Corporate Plan Ex Minute G18.0621.032 – Adoption of Annual Plan and Budget 2018-19

5 DISCUSSION

The Operational Plan for 2018-19 comprises eight external Service Programs, delivering 34 services, and two internal Service Programs comprising 13 services. Progress of initiatives within each service is reported each quarter, with each initiative assessed and a status allocated.

Gold Coast 2022 comprises three themes, Place, Prosperity, People, together with an outcome Supporting the Delivery of Gold Coast 2022. Progress of Signature Action initiatives is reported each quarter (as part of the Operational Plan Progress Report). Progress towards the achievement of Gold Coast 2022 outcomes is assessed annually through a suite of performance measures.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 193 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1)

Performance dashboards summarising the non-financial and financial performance of the City Operational Plan 2018-19 and Gold Coast 2022 can be found in the Attachments 1 and 2.

5.1 SUMMARY OF PROGRESS

5.1.1 City Operational Plan 2018-19

At 30 June 2019, the City Operational Plan consisted of 63 reported initiatives with a total budget of $150.3 million.

A summary of the key results are below:

Non-financial progress: . 49 (78%) of the initiatives were either ‘On Track’ or ‘Completed’ . 9 (14%) were “Monitor”,1 (2%) were cancelled and 4 (6%) were “On Hold”

Financial progress: . Year-to-date spend was $113.8 million (76%) of the total budget of $150.3 million

No initiatives were assessed as ‘Action Required’ for this quarter.

The performance dashboard for the City Operational Plan 2018-19 can be found at Attachment 1.

5.1.2 Gold Coast 2022

This report provides progress report against Gold Coast 2022 as at quarter four 2018-19.

Signature Action initiative performance Signature Action initiative performance is assessed through non-financial and financial performance. During 2018-19, Gold Coast 2022 Signature Actions were progressed through 41 initiatives representing a total planned investment of $110.7 million. Key end of year results include: Non-financial progress: . 34 (83%) of the initiatives were either ‘On Track’ or ‘Completed’ . 6 (15%) were “Monitor” and 1(2%) were “On Hold”

Financial progress: . Year-to-date spend was $87.9 million (79%) of the total budget of $110.7 million No initiatives were assessed as ‘Action Required’ for this quarter. The performance dashboard for Gold Coast 2022 Signature Action initiatives can be found at Attachment 2a.

Outcome performance Gold Coast 2022 has 23 outcomes identified across the plan themes. Assessment of each outcome is evaluated through the performance of a single or multiple performance measures associated with that outcome.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 194 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1)

Key end of year results for 2018-19 include:

. 10 of 23 outcomes (44%) were rated as ‘On-Track’ . 12 of 23 outcomes (52%) were rated as ‘Monitor’ . 1 of 23 outcomes (4%) was assessed as ‘Review’.

Overall, performance of the 23 outcomes of Gold Coast 2022 has declined compared to 2017-18, when 14 of the 23 outcomes were rated as “On Track”. This decline is evident across all outcomes, with the exception of the Supporting outcome. A number of factors may have impacted the performance result in 2018-19, including:

• measure ratings – for some measures this is the first year of comparative data i.e. the first measurement against the original baseline. For others this was the first time the measure was rated against an identified checkpoint. Both of these contributed to reduced ratings in 2018-19. It is however important to note that the checkpoints identified in Gold Coast 2022 are intended to be aspirational and represent a stretch-target for the City • initiatives – initiatives being identified and delivered may not be providing the contribution needed to deliver the outcome required • Commonwealth Games – in the two year lead up to GC2018, it was critical that the City focused on the planning and implementation of initiatives required to deliver GC2018. This focus may have created a lag in the planning and delivery of initiatives required to support the implementation of Gold Coast 2022. It is also recognised however, that some Gold Coast 2022 initiatives were also fast-tracked to support GC2018 • external factors - some measures rely on community activation and/or community sentiment. These can be potentially impacted by national issues and media coverage e.g. waste recycling

Of the 77 performance measures used to assess performance across the 23 outcomes, 13 were assessed as ‘Review’ at the end of 2018-19. Exception based commentary on these by theme and outcome is included in the sections below. These outcomes will require additional focus in 2019-20, in order to improve performance in future years.

The performance dashboard for Gold Coast 2022 Outcome performance can be found at Attachment 2b and Gold Coast 2022 Measure performance at Attachment 2c.

Theme Place - performance

Performance of this theme is assessed through eight outcomes, using 24 performance measures:

• of the eight outcomes, 1 was identified as “Review” at the end of 2018-19 (1.2 We live in balance with nature), due to two performance measures being rated as “Review”. • of the 24 measures, five measures were identified as “Review” in 2018-19 and exception based commentary by outcome can be found below • overall performance for this theme has been assessed as “Monitor” for 2018-19

Outcome 1.1 Our city provides a choice of liveable places Percentage of city dwellings that are detached - the City Plan provides for a choice of different housing types consistent with a city having a compact urban structure of well- planned communities. As the city population grows, the proportion of detached dwellings

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 195 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1) is expected to reduce over time, reflecting diversity of housing choice supported by improvements in city connectivity.

While the percentage of detached dwellings reduced since 2013 from 50 per cent to 46.3 per cent in 2017-18, the result for 2018-19 increased to 49.3 per cent, which is above the desired checkpoint for 2019 of 42 per cent.

This fluctuation of market conditions, evident over recent years, is contributed to by the northern growth corridor having a significant increase in sales for house and land packages in mid-2017 to late 2018 and by an increase in the number of secondary dwelling approvals in response to planning scheme changes. This will be closely monitored to determine whether there is an established trend before any amendments to the City Plan are proposed. Outcome 1.2 We live in balance with nature Total native vegetation cover and Condition of native vegetation cover - the Gold Coast is a biodiverse city which understands the importance of natural assets to lifestyle. This is reflected in the Our Natural City Strategy, adopted in 2017, which encourages nature-based recreation while at the same time safeguarding our beaches, wetlands, waterways, rainforests, bushland, coastal and marine environments and the wildlife these habitats support. The results this year demonstrate a decline in the total native vegetation cover and condition of native vegetation across the city. Between 2005 and 2015 there has been a net decrease in native vegetation cover of 0.37 per cent (489 ha) and the latest data identifies the City’s total native vegetation cover at 50.22 per cent (64,950 ha). The condition of the city’s native vegetation cover (includes native high quality vegetation, disturbed remnant vegetation and the regrowth remnant vegetation) has also declined from the 2013 baseline, with a decrease in both high quality and disturbed remnant vegetation recorded.

Our Natural City Strategy includes a range of actions to address improvement in 2019-20, including commencing a native vegetation restoration project, designed to support the condition of native vegetation and vegetation cover. Outcome 1.3 We manage our resources for a sustainable future Percentage of total waste recycled - the Solid Waste Strategy 2024, adopted in 2015 seeks to engage the city in positive waste behaviours such as waste avoidance, re-use and recycling. During 2018-19 the percentage of total waste recycled was 37.4 per cent which is below the desired 2019 checkpoint of 45 per cent. This result, though similar to 2017-18, included an increase in construction and demolition recycling and decrease in domestic waste recycling. The Solid Waste Strategy has a number of actions planned in 2019-20 which are expected to improve this position, including the expansion and promotion of the green waste service city wide and the promotion of waste recycling centres such as recycle street and green waste drop and go zones. Outcome 1.7 Everyone can enjoy a beach experience Community satisfaction with services for beach facilities and safety - the City delivers a variety of services to support beach safety, and maintains strong relationships with other organisations, such as Surf Lifesaving Queensland, the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, and Maritime Safety Queensland to enhance the reputation of the Gold Coast as a safe place to enjoy the beach. The City also delivers and maintains a variety of beach facility infrastructure to enhance users’ ability to enjoy our coastline.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 196 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1)

The 2019 survey result for community satisfaction with services for beach facilities and safety of 86.69 per cent is a decrease from 2017-18 result of 95.38 per cent. This decrease may be attributed to a change in the survey response form, which adjusted the range of scoring compared to previous years. This adjustment was made through the Corporate Communication Branch to align the survey with standard industry survey practices. This result, while a decrease from previous years, continues to reflect high satisfaction with City beach facilities and safety. The survey responses will be used to inform future actions of the Ocean Beaches Strategy 2013-2023.

Theme Prosperity - performance

Performance of this theme is assessed through six outcomes, using 22 performance measures:

• of the six outcomes, none were identified as “Review” at the end of 2018-19. • of the 22 measures, three were identified as “Review” in 2018-19 and exception based commentary by outcome can be found below • overall performance for this theme has been assessed as “On Track” for 2018-19

Outcome 2.1 Our city’s economy is diverse and innovative Attract National Sporting Organisations to relocate to the City - the City aims to attract two new national sporting organisations a year to relocate to the Gold Coast, to support job creation and increase the capability and capacity of the local Gold Coast sports industry. Since 2015, the City has facilitated the attraction of four sporting organisations to relocate their offices to the Gold Coast (Squash Australia, Triathlon Australia, Mountain Bike Australia and FIBA Oceania). While there were no new organisations attracted to the Gold Coast during 2018-19, the City will continue to target a range of sporting organisations to establish their headquarters on the Gold Coast in the coming year. Outcome 2.2 We have a thriving cultural economy Increase in the value of film productions - the City is striving to attract and retain creative skills, talent and investment in order to build a strong cultural economy. A key segment of the cultural economy is the city’s film industry. The City’s Film Attraction Program provides financial incentives and support to film, television and related productions who are considering the Gold Coast as a film location. Success is measured through the value of film and television productions that generate benefits for the local economy.

This year, while the result was below the 2016 baseline of $135 million and desired 2019 target of $149 million, the value of film production increased from $42.8 million to $133.4 million due to the filming of three international feature films including: Dora The Explorer; Godzilla vs Kong; and Monster Problems; and the television series, Reef Break. Outcome 2.3 We have infrastructure that supports productivity and growth Productive value add per worker - The productivity of the workforce is an important economic indicator and monitoring change supports City advocacy for future funding and resources. The results this year demonstrate a slight decrease in the productive value add per worker from the 2015 baseline of $96,613 to $95,135 in 2018-19. This is primarily due to a reduction in productivity relating to agriculture, forestry and fishing and mining. These results will be used to inform future actions of the Economic Development Strategy.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 197 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1)

Theme People - performance

Performance of this theme is assessed through six outcomes, using 17 performance measures:

• of the six outcomes, none were identified as “Review” at the end of 2018-19 • of the 17 measures, four were identified as “Review” in 2018-19 and exception based commentary by outcome can be found below • overall performance for this theme has been assessed as “Monitor” for 2018-19

Outcome 3.1 Our city is safe Percentage of residents who have one place where emergency items are stored in case they are impacted by severe weather and Percentage of residents who indicated that they had an emergency plan - While the Gold Coast is renowned for its sunny weather, the city is still vulnerable to floods, storms, bushfires, cyclones and heat waves. The City supports community resilience by providing advice, emergency check-lists and kits and disaster coordination and recovery services. The community survey for 2018-19 identifies that 46 per cent of Gold Coast residents have an emergency kit or one place where emergency items are stored in case of severe weather or disaster compared with 35.8 per cent in 2017-18. While this represents a 10 per cent increase since the previous year, this result falls below the desired 2019 checkpoint of 65 per cent. With regard to emergency plans, 40 per cent of residents indicated that have an emergency plan for their household, compared with 43.1 per cent in 2017-18. This represents a slight decrease since the previous year and is below the desired checkpoint of for 2019 of 45 per cent. Whilst these measures have not reach the intended target this is likely to be a result of inadequate survey techniques and unrealistic increase in percentages within current targets.

Current research indicates that disaster preparedness can be measured through the following elements: • Understanding and awareness of risks • Perception of roles and responsibilities in a disaster/emergency • Means of accessing disaster related information • Motivating factors and barriers for disaster preparedness • Preparedness actions taken

Moving to these measures, conducting a baseline survey to determine current preparedness levels will enhance our current understanding of community disaster preparedness. Once implemented a targeted increase of 5% of preparedness levels is a goal which is specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and timely.

The current survey responses will be used to inform future actions to improve resident preparedness for emergencies. The City will continue to engage local residents through the ‘Get Ready Gold Coast’ campaign that aims to educate, raise awareness and encourage action to build resilience against future disaster events. Outcome 3.5 Our city provides a wide range of job opportunities Percentage increase in residents with a bachelor/tertiary degree or above (Growth in participation in Tertiary Education) - City of Gold Coast supports lifelong learning, recognising that anyone, at any age, can make a positive contribution to the life and future of

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 198 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1) our city. A key indicator, which supports the growth of the city’s economy is the percentage of residents with a bachelor/tertiary degree or above. The latest result reported in 2018-19 was that 23.2 percent of residents had a bachelor/ tertiary degree or above compared with the national average of 30.2 per cent, which was the desired checkpoint for 2019. While this result is lower than desired, the result of 23.2 per cent reflects a significant increase on the original baseline of 14.3 per cent in 2011. These results will be used to inform future actions of the Economic Development Strategy. Outcome 3.6 We are an active and healthy community Percentage of Gold Coast City adult residents who meet the National Physical Activity Guidelines- City of Gold Coast encourages residents to lead active and healthy lives and provides sporting facilities and recreation opportunities for both residents and visitors. While the percentage of City of Gold Coast adult residents undertaking sufficient activity to meet the National Physical Activity Guidelines has improved since 2009-10 (57.6 per cent), the results for 2018-19 were 63 per cent, which is below the baseline of 64.1% (2014) and the desired checkpoint of 68.26 per cent (2019). However, the proportion of adults on the Gold Coast undertaking sufficient physical activity for a health benefit is still higher than most other regional areas. To improve on this position, a more targeted approach is needed towards inactive people. This target group will require a greater focus on physical activity and non-structured recreation as a re-engagement and are less likely to engage in traditional sports.

Theme – Supporting the delivery of Gold Coast 2022 – performance

Performance of this theme is assessed through three outcomes, using 14 performance measures:

• of the three outcomes, none were identified as “Review” at the end of 2018-19. • of the 14 measures, one was identified as “Review” in 2018-19 and exception based commentary by outcome can be found below. • overall performance for this theme has been assessed as “On Track” for 2018-19

Outcome B – we manage the city responsibly Operating Surplus Ratio - The operating surplus ratio measures the extent to which operating revenues cover operating expenses to assess the financial sustainability of the City. The 2018-19 result of 0.09% is an improvement from the 2017-18 result of -3.7% that had declined due to high operating expenses incurred in staging the GC2018. However the 2018- 19 result is still below the 2016 baseline of 1.1% and the 2019 checkpoint of 4.0 %. Ratios can fluctuate from year to year and the aim is to always meet the Operating Surplus benchmark of >0%, which is agreed with Queensland Treasury Corporation in their borrowing terms with Council or set by legislation.

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

This report summarises Council’s progress towards implementing Gold Coast 2022 and the City Operational Plan 2018-19.

7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS

This report has been developed using existing internal resources only.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 199 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1)

8 RISK MANAGEMENT

The initiatives covered by this report address a range of risks on the Corporate Risk Register.

9 STATUTORY MATTERS

This report is presented to Council pursuant to the Local Government Act 2009 and to regulations 174 (3) and 174 (5) of the Local Government Regulations 2012, which state:

“(3) The chief executive officer must present a written assessment of the local government’s progress towards implementing the annual operational plan at meetings of the local government held at regular intervals of not more than 3 months. (5) A local government must discharge its responsibilities in a way that is consistent with its annual operational plan.”

10 COUNCIL POLICIES

Not applicable.

11 DELEGATIONS

Not applicable.

12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION

Each Director has approved directorate contributions to performance reporting of initiatives and corporate measures, which provided the basis for this report.

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS

Not applicable.

14 TIMING

This report is provided on a quarterly basis in accordance with regulations 174(3) and 174(5) of the Local Government Regulations 2012.

15 CONCLUSION

This Performance Report provides an assessment of performance for the Gold Coast 2022 and for the City Operational Plan 2018-19 at the end of quarter four 2018-19.

As at quarter four, 78% of Operational Plan initiatives were either “On Track” or “Completed” and 76% of the latest revised budget has been spent. This represents a sound result for the City Operational Plan 2018-19.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 200 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1)

With regard to Gold Coast 2022, during 2018-19, 83% of initiatives delivering signature actions were “On Track” or “Completed” and 79% of the latest revised budget has been spent. While the performance in relation to Gold Coast 2022 initiatives in 2018-19 was high, a decline was evident in relation to the performance of Gold Coast 2022 outcomes, measured through selected performance measures. At the end of 2018-19, 10 of the 23 outcomes were “On Track”, compared to 14 at the end of 2017-18. Identified outcomes will require additional focus in 2019-20 in order to improve performance in future years.

A report on progress of both the City Operational Plan and Gold Coast 2022 will be included in the City of Gold Coast Annual Report, which is scheduled for consideration by Council in October 2019.

16 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:

1 That Council approves the final performance report on the City Operational Plan 2018-19 2 That Council approves the 2018-19 performance report on Gold Coast 2022 3 Note that the performance against the City Operational Plan 2018-19 and Gold Coast 2022 will be reported in the Annual Report 2018-19 scheduled for Council consideration in October 2019

Author: Authorised by: Sarah Wilton Joe McCabe Manager Corporate Planning and Chief Operating Officer Performance 7 September 2019 TRACKS REF: #73675623

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.004 moved Cr Owen-Jones seconded Cr PC Young

1 That Council approves the final performance report on the City Operational Plan 2018-19. 2 That Council approves the 2018-19 performance report on Gold Coast 2022. 3 That Council note that the performance against the City Operational Plan 2018-19 and Gold Coast 2022 will be reported in the Annual Report 2018-19 scheduled for Council consideration in October 2019.

CARRIED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 201 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1) Attachment 1

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 202 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1) Attachment 2a

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 203 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1) Attachment 2b

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 204 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1) Attachment 2c

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 205 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1) Gold Coast 2022 Outcome Measures Performance Overview 2018-19 Attachment 2c (continued)

PLACE PROSPERITY

PEOPLE

SUPPORTING THE DELIVERYOF GC2022 DELIVERYOF

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 206 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 4 (Continued) GOLD COAST 2022 AND CITY OPERATIONAL PLAN 2018-19 – PERFORMANCE REPORT 2018-19 QUARTER FOUR LG113/580/23(P1) Performance Dashboard: Legend and Definitions Attachment 3

Term Definition YTD Spend or % Spend Year-To-Date expenditure. This includes adjusted commitments for end of Financial Year. Revised Budget The current year's approved budget for the project as per the last budget adoption or budget review. Note 1 All percentages in the dashboard report have been rounded. Note 2 SAP financial data is as at 29 July 2019 to adjust for end of Financial Year accruals. Note 3 Initiative Q4 data (excluding SAP financial data) is as at 30 June 2019. Initiative Dashboard Source: TRACKS-#73663901-v1-SHAREPOINT_1_EXPORT_Q4_INITIATIVE_REPORTING saved at G:\SHARE\CPP Reporting\2. 2018-19 Reporting\2018- Note 4 19 Q4 Reporting Measure Dashboard Source: TRACKS-#73726952-v1-SHAREPOINT_4_ALL_MEASURES_EXPORT_AS_OF_20190617 saved at G:\SHARE\CPP Reporting\2. 2018-19 Note 5 Reporting\2018-19 Q4 Reporting Note 6 A single measure may be used to support the assessment of more than one outcome however it will be reported under the primary outcome only.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 207 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2) Refer Attachment A - Council Policies amended 1January – 30 June 2019 Refer Attachment B – Council Policies under review at 30 June 2019 Refer Attachment C - Status of Council policies at 30 June 2019

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY

Not applicable.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Not applicable.

3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

The purpose of this report is to present the status of Council Policies as at 30 June 2019.

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS

ETG19.0321.007 That Council note the Corporate Policy Portfolio Report 1 July – 31 December 2018.

5 DISCUSSION

Policies clarify Council’s position on an issue. All new Council policies and major policy changes require a Council resolution.

Policies are generally reviewed every two years to ensure continued alignment with Council objectives and legislative requirements and to minimise the risk of conveying out of date policy information to staff and the community. Minor changes that do not affect the intent or purpose of the policy may be approved by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) or Chief Operating Officer (COO) under delegated power. The Corporate Policy Officer (CPO) has delegated power to correct minor spelling, grammatical or formatting errors.

The policy portfolio currently consists of 79 Council policies that relate to matters of public interest and external service delivery and 55 Administrative policies that relate to internal operations. This report provides a summary of the status of all Council policies at 30 June 2019.

5.1 Policy activity During the period 1 January – 30 June 2019: • The Investigation (Inappropriate Conduct of Councillors) Policy was adopted by Council – G19.0326.034 • 22 existing Council policies were amended. Six of these policies were amended by Council resolution. The remaining amendments were approved by the CEO or the COO as the changes were minor and did not affect the intent or purpose of the policy. (See Attachment A for details – this attachment includes an additional column with a link to the tracked-changes version of the policy, as requested by the Events Tourism and Governance Committee on 23 August 2018).

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 208 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2)

At 30 June 2019, 80 per cent (63) of all Council policies were current, 13 per cent (10) were under review (refer Attachment B) and 7 per cent (6) were overdue for review.

Figure 1: Percentage of Council Policies that are current, under review or overdue for review % 90

70 Target

60 Current

50 Under review

40 Overdue

0 Jun-15 Jun-16 Dec-16 Jun-17 Dec-17 Jun-18 Dec-18 Jun-19 Note: The policy review target is to have least 70 per cent of policies up to date (current) at any time. 80% of policies are classified as current, exceeding the 70% target.

For further details about the review status of each policy, please refer to Attachment C.

5.2 Community Access to Policies

During the reporting period a total of 4,948 downloads of policies, published to the Publication Scheme on Council's website, was recorded. The 10 most accessed policies were:

Policy Number of downloads Water and Sewage Leakage Relief Policy 832 Water and Sewerage Connections Policy and Procedure 332 Procurement Policy and Contract Manual 217 Management of Trees on Council Land 185 Code of Conduct for Staff Policy 163 Sporting Field Closure Policy 163 Work Health and Safety Policy 163 Water Sub Metering and Billing for Community Titles Schemes Policy 139 Councillor Remuneration Policy 130 Garage Sales Policy 130

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 209 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2)

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

Council Policies support the implementation of the City Vision and Corporate Plan - Gold Coast 2022: A: We plan for the future of the City B: We manage the city responsibly C: We actively engage residents, customers and visitors

7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS

The Corporate Policy Portfolio is managed by the Corporate Planning and Performance Branch using internal resources only.

8 RISK MANAGEMENT

Monitoring and reporting on the status of the Corporate Policy Portfolio aligns with mitigating corporate risks defined by the risk category Governance.

The policy process includes an assessment of the level of risk to Council if the policy is not reviewed regularly. The purpose of monitoring risk levels is to ensure focus on the review of ‘high’ and ‘medium’ risk policies (refer to Table 1).

Table 1: Number of policies by risk rating at 30 June 2019 Risk rating Number of policies High 5 Medium 34 Low 37 Not yet classified 3

Total 79 *Remaining three policies will be classified as the policy is reviewed. Of the five policies classified as high-risk three are current, one is overdue and one is under review.

9 STATUTORY MATTERS

Council and Administrative policies are approved, amended and retired in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2, Part 1, Sections 12 and 13 of the Local Government Act 2009.

10 COUNCIL POLICIES

Refer to Attachment C for a complete list of Council Policies.

11 DELEGATIONS

Delegation 602 provides that the Mayor, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Operating Officer (COO) may determine amendments to any council policy where the amendment is of an administrative or purely technical nature and does not affect the intent or purpose of the policy. Delegation 1817 enables the COO to determine amendments to any administrative policy where the amendment is of an administrative or purely technical nature and does not affect the purpose or intent of the policy. Delegation 1158 enables the Corporate Policy Officer to correct minor spelling/grammatical or formatting errors.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 210 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2)

12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION

Stakeholder Consulted Directorate Satisfied with the report content Chief Operating Officer Office of the COO Yes Manager Corporate Planning Office of the COO Yes and Performance Policy Owners All Directorates Yes - Provision of status information on relevant policies Corporate Policy Officer Office of the COO Yes

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS

All policy owners must comply with Council’s process for policy development, communication and review as identified in the Corporate Policy Value Management Process.

14 TIMING

A Corporate Policy Portfolio Report on Council policies is presented to Council via the Events, Tourism and Governance Committee every six months.

15 CONCLUSION

The policy portfolio currently includes 79 Council policies. As at 30 June 2019, 80% of Council Policies were current, demonstrating active management of policies as they fall due for review.

16 RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:

That Council note the Corporate Policy Portfolio Report 1 January – 30 June 2019.

Author: Authorised by: Sarah Wilton Joe McCabe Manager Corporate Planning & Performance Chief Operating Officer 20 August 2019 TRACKS REF: #73944367

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.005 moved Cr Owen-Jones seconded Cr PC Young

That Council note the Corporate Policy Portfolio Report 1 January – 30 June 2019.

CARRIED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 211 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2) Attachment A: Council Policies amended 1 January – 30 June 2019 Approved Date Policy Amendment iSpot reference * by Clarification of definitions and new 15.01.19 Debt Recovery Policy #43874130v13 COO performance measure proposed Correct risk assessment reference and 15.01.19 Deferral of Rates Policy #44220770v7 COO delegation number Pensioner Rate Rebate G18.0621.026/G18.0621.027 (Budget) 21.01.19 #49216604v7 Council Policy Effective 21 June 2018 Replace performance measure, clarify Traffic Calming Devices 13.03.19 definition, add Emergency Services to #40150196v15 A/COO Policy consultation requirements Park Usage Policy: Use LC19.0314.003/G19.0326.009 by Conference and 01.04.19 Amended definition of #50606627v5 Council Corporate Associated Produce/promotional launch Events Attachment A Guidelines Update Open Space separate charge to current reference Insert words park or facility to provide Park Usage Policy: more clarity 08.04.19 Naming of Parks and Provide clarification in relation to #57106416v4 COO Community Facilities naming a park after the street - where street is named after a person Attachment B Application Process Include panel dedication wording where there is no official ceremony conducted Replace performance measure Good Working Correct grammar 02.05.19 #51756519v4 COO Relationships Policy Replace Diversity and Equity Officer with People and Culture Branch Correct name of directorate Naming of Bridge 02.05.09 Insert word Council #54939456v4 COO Structures Policy Insert for their application Concession for Water Consumption by Renal Correct list of Legislation and 02.05.19 Dialysis Patients #41857479v6 COO Directorate title Dialysing at Home Policy Changes to ensure alignment with Signage and Brand 02.05.19 Parks Usage Policy: Naming of Parks #45511506v6 COO Policy and community Facilities Policy Separate reference to Buildings asset class into two new classes Buildings at Non Current Asset 17.05.19 Replacement Cost and Buildings at #53597039v10 COO Accounting Policy Market Value Amendments to revaluation schedules G18.0621.007 & EPE18.0619.003/G18.0621.045 Rate Donation, Effective 1 July 2018 Infrastructure Charges (Insertion of Koala Habitat Acquisition 17.05.19 and Development #49216397v13 Council and Enhancement Separate Charge Application Fee where applicable and removal of Discount Policy reference to Safety Camera special rates donation) Residential Tree Correct Contact Officer and sponsor 28.05.19 #49361989v7 COO Scheme Policy title Park Usage Policy: Temporary Park Correct Contact Officer and web links 28.05.09 Occupation and Change sponsor #72795652v2 COO Traverse for Correct references to legislation Construction Purposes Correct references to government On Line Advertising 28.05.19 offices #49322722v5 COO Policy Insert links to policy and standards 28.05.19 Revenue Policy G19.0528.019 Budget #43852261v19 Council

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 212 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2)

Approved Date Policy Amendment iSpot reference * by Objectives reworded #73988736v1 Performance Measure replaced (tracked changes) Policy Statement reworded Nature Strip (Footpath) Scope reworded #29198412v4 29.05.19 Road Verge Mowing A/COO Add definition for gated community Previous policy Policy Correct iSpot references Attachment A – coloured diagram #29198412v5 added to provide clear information Reviewed policy 13.06.19 Debt Policy 2019-20 G19.0613.032l Budget #48273889v21 Council Procurement Policy ETG19.0606.007/G0613.051 13.06.19 #58809252v17 Council and Contract Manual Amendments to Contracting Plan Increase annual remuneration in accordance the Local Government Councillor 19.06.19 Remuneration and Discipline Tribunal 50688937v11 COO Remuneration Policy Report 2018

Insert definition for local streetscaping

Attachment A Procedures Amend Local Area Works and • Christmas Decorations Section 25.06.19 Services Program 52051314v7 COO • Points of Contact Policy • Developer contribution – Parks - remove mounding, grassing and insert landscape improvements

Policy Statement • Correct Committee name CEO Annual • Clarify forthcoming year's KPO 26.06.19 Performance Review determined by Council 57254840v6 A\CEO Policy Scope clarified Correct title of policy owner Correct legislative reference

*iSpot reference - link to the policy with the changes tracked

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 213 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2) Attachment B: Council Policies under review at 30 June 2018

1. Banner Booking Policy 2. Councillor Participation in Without Prejudice Meetings Planning and Environment Court Policy 3. Expenditure of Infrastructure Charges Policy 4. Nature Conservation Assistance Program Policy 5. Officers Indemnity (Including Legal Representation) Insurance and Access to Documents Policy 6. Open Space Preservation Levy Land Acquisition Policy – Phase 3 7. Personal Liability of Employees Policy (Providing Better Protection) 8. Public Art Policy 9. Water and Sewage Leakage Relief Policy 10. Customer Contact Policy

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 214 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2) Attachment C: STATUS OF COUNCIL POLICIES AS AT 30 JUNE 2019 Review Action Policy Name Due Status Branch Progress Risk Required Date TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Business & Disaster Management No action No action Sep-19 Current Program High Policy required required Management Local Area Works and Infrastructure No action No action Services Program Jun-21 Current Medium Delivery required required Policy Naming of Bridge City Assets No action No action May-21 Current Medium Structures Policy Branch required required Traffic Calming Devices Transport & No action No action Mar-21 Current Medium Policy Traffic Branch required required LIFESTYLE AND COMMUNITY Safe & Liveable No action No action Equitable Access Policy Aug-20 Current Low Communities required required Safe & Liveable No action No action Graffiti Policy Dec-20 Current Medium Communities required required Library Collection No action No action Development and De- Sep-19 Current City Libraries Medium required required selection Policy Management of Trees Parks & No action No action on Council Controlled Jul-20 Current Recreational Low required required Land Policy Services Nature Strip (Footpath)/ Parks & No action No action Road Verge Mowing May-21 Current Recreational Low required required Policy Services Parks & Park Usage Policy - No action No action Nov-19 Current Recreational Medium Right of Use required required Services Park Usage Policy - Parks & Temporary Commercial No action No action Oct-19 Current Recreational Medium Recreation Activities on required required Services Council Parks Park Usage Policy - Parks & No action No action Naming of Parks and Apr-21 Current Recreational Low required required Community Facilities Services Park Usage Policy - Temporary Use of Parks & Parks by No action No action Jul-20 Current Recreational Medium Individuals/Groups or required required Services Community Organisations Park Usage Policy - Parks & Use by Conference and No action No action Apr-21 Current Recreational Medium Corporate Associated required required Services Events Park Usage Policy - Temporary Park Parks & No action No action Occupation and May-21 Current Recreational Medium required required Traverse for Services Construction Purposes Permanent Sites At No action No action Feb-20 Current Tourist Parks Medium Tourist Parks Policy required required VP Under review Draft out for Public Art Policy Sep-12 Arts & Culture submitted to <12 months consultation CPP Parks & Residential Tree No action No action May-21 Current Recreational Low Scheme Policy required required Services

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 215 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2)

Review Action Risk Policy Name Due Status Branch Progress required Date Parks & Sports Field Closure No action No action Dec-20 Current Recreational Medium Policy required required Services WATER AND WASTE Concession for Water Consumption Charges Customer No action No action May-21 Current Medium Due to Renal Dialysis Engagement required required Patients at Home Policy Waiting for Waste Disposal Fee Overdue Waste VP to be Policy to be Sep-18 Low Concession Policy <12 months Management submitted to reviewed CPP VP Policy to Water and Sewage Under review Customer Jan-15 submitted to Council prior Low Leakage Relief Policy >12 months Engagement CPP to end 2019 WW19.00429.006 Water Sub-Metering Customer No action No action and Billing for CTS Apr-20 Current Medium Engagement required required Properties Policy Water and Sewerage Customer No action No action Feb-20 Current Medium Connections Policy Engagement required required Water Usage for Customer No action No action Genuine Fire Jul-19 Current Low Engagement required required Emergencies Policy OFFICE OF THE CEO Appointment of Acting Chief Office of the No action No action Jan-20 Current Low Executive Officer CEO Branch required required

Policy Appointment of Office of the No action No action Mar-20 Current Low Acting Mayor Policy CEO Branch required required CEO Annual Office of the No action No action Performance Oct-20 Current Low CEO Branch required required Review Policy Community Grants Office of the No action No action Jan-20 Current Low Policy CEO Branch required required Complaints Office of the No action No action (Administrative Oct-19 Current Low CEO Branch required required Actions) Policy Complaints About Office of the No action No action Nov-20 Current Medium the Public Official CEO Branch required required Councillor Office of the No action No action Remuneration Jun-20 Current Low CEO Branch required required Policy Waiting for Entertainment and Overdue Office of the VP to be Policy to be Hospitality Apr-18 Low >12 months CEO Branch submitted to reviewed Expenditure Policy CPP Expenses Reimbursement and Provision of Office of the No action No action Jun-20 Current Medium Facilities for Mayor CEO Branch required required and Councillors Policy Public Access to Council & Standing Committee Office of the No action No action Jun-20 Current Low Agenda/Minute/Rep CEO Branch required required ort Documentation Policy

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 216 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2)

Review Action Risk Policy Name Due Status Branch Progress required Date OFFICE OF THE COO Advertising Spending Corporate No action No action Oct-20 Current Medium Policy Communication required required Asset Management Asset No action No action Dec-20 Current Medium Policy Management required required Audit Committee Policy Dec-19 Current Corporate No action No action Low Assurance required required Corporate No action No action Bank Guarantee Policy Oct-20 Current Medium Finance required required VP VP with COO Under review Corporate Banner Booking Policy Feb-19 submitted to for Low <12 months Communication CPP consideration Corporate No action No action Budget Review Policy Jul-19 Current High Finance required required City Honours and Corporate No action No action Sep-19 Current Medium Recognition Policy Communication required required Waiting for Corporate Community Overdue VP to be Policy to be Feb-18 Planning & Low Consultation Policy >12 months submitted to reviewed Performance CPP Councillor Participation Waiting for in Without Prejudice Under review VP to be Policy to be Meetings Planning and Oct-14 Legal Services >12 months submitted to reviewed Environment Court CPP Policy Corporate No action No action Credit Risk Policy Jun-20 Current High Finance required required Corporate No action No action Debt Policy Jun-20 Current Low Finance required required Enterprise Risk Corporate No action No action Jul-20 Current Medium Management Policy Safety & Risk required required Event Ticket Allocation No action No action Oct-20 Current Mayor's office Low and Attendance Policy required required Waiting for External Overdue Corporate VP to be Policy to be Aug 18 Medium Communication Policy <12 months Communication submitted to reviewed CPP Waiting for Financial Instrument Overdue Corporate VP to be Policy to be Jan-19 High Policy <12 months Finance submitted to reviewed CPP International Relations No action No action Jun- 20 Current Mayor's office Medium and Engagement Policy required required Investigation No action No action (Inappropriate Conduct Feb-21 Current Legal Services Low required required of Councillors) Policy Corporate No action No action Investment Policy Nov-20 Current Medium Finance required required Non-Current Asset Corporate No action No action Jul 19 Current Medium Accounting Finance Required required Officers Indemnity Waiting for (Including Legal Under review VP to be Policy to be Representation) Feb-18 Legal Services Low <12 months submitted to reviewed Insurance and Access CPP to Documents Policy Personal Liability of Waiting for Employees Policy Under review VP to be Policy to be Sep-18 Legal Services Low (Providing Better <12 months submitted to reviewed Protection) CPP

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 217 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2)

Review Risk Policy Name Due Status Branch Progress Action required

Date Public Funding No action No action Involving Private Oct-20 Current Legal Services Medium required required Property Policy Recognition of Service No action No action Oct-20 Current Mayor's Office Low as a Councillor required required Corporate No action No action Revenue Policy Jun-20 Current Low Finance required required Signage and Brand Corporate No action No action May-21 Current Low Policy Communication required required Water and Sewerage Services Capital Corporate No action No action Structure and Jun 20 Current Medium Finance required required Community Returns Policy ORGANISATIONAL SERVICES Council Leasing Policy –State Reserves and Council Freehold Land for Sporting, Property No action No action Dec-19 Current Low Recreational, Services required required Community Services and Educational Purposes VP Customer Contact Under review Customer Policy to be Sep-11 submitted to Medium Policy >12 months Contact reviewed CPP Revenue No action No action Debt Recovery Policy Jan-21 Current Low Services required required Revenue No action No action Deferral of Rates Policy Mar -20 Current Low Services required required Good Working People & No action No action May-21 Current Low Relationships Policy Culture required required Online Advertising Customer No action No action May-21 Current Medium Policy Contact required required Pensioner Rates Revenue No action No action Jun-20 Current Low Rebate Policy Services required required Procurement Policy and No action No action Dec-19 Current Office of CPO Low Contract Manual required required Rate Donation, Infrastructure Charges Revenue No action No action and Development Jun-19 Current Low Services required required Application Fee Discount Policy Telecommunication Carrier Leasing - Property No action No action Mobile 'Phone Towers Jul-20 Current Medium Services required required and Associated Infrastructure Policy ECONOMY, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT Environmental Offset No action No action External Investment May 20 Current City Planning Medium required required Governance Policy Expenditure of VP Under review Policy to be Infrastructure Charges Feb-15 City Planning submitted >12 months reviewed Policy to CPP City No action No action Garage Sales Policy Oct-19 Current Low Development required required

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 218 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 5 (Continued) CORPORATE POLICY PORTFOLIO REPORT 1 JANUARY – 30 JUNE 2019 LG449/756/02/01(P2)

Review Action Risk Policy Name Due Status Branch Progress required Date ECONOMY, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT (con't) Waiting for Management of Major Overdue City VP to be Policy to be Dec-16 Low Projects Status Policy >12 months Development submitted reviewed to CPP Nature Conservation Under review Policy to Policy to be Assistance Program Oct-18 City Planning Medium <12 months be drafted reviewed Policy Open Space Policy has Under review Policy to be Preservation Levy Land Sep-15 City Planning been High <12 months reviewed Acquisition Policy – 3 drafted Street Naming and City No action No action Renaming of Existing Mar 20 Current Low Development required required Streets Policy Voluntary Conservation No action No action Agreement Scheme Aug-19 Current City Planning Medium required required Policy

*A Value Proposition (VP) submitted to Corporate Planning and Performance (CPP) is confirmation by the policy owner that the policy is being review

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 219 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 6 ORGANISATIONAL SERVICES HISTORY AND FUTURE DEALING WITH COUNCIL FREEHOLD LOT 6 ON RP138987 – CURRUMBIN VALLEY PN125059/16/-(P5) Refer 2 page attachment

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY

Not Applicable.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Not Applicable.

3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

To advise Council on the history of Council freehold Lot 6 on RP138987 in Currumbin Valley and to seek Council’s resolution on further dealing with the lot.

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS

Not Applicable.

5 DISCUSSION

The City holds freehold title to Lot 6 on RP138987 (Lot 6) in Currumbin Valley (see aerial photo at Attachment 1 for cadastral lots). Lot 6 has an area of 5,071 square metres and importantly in the context of this report, the lot is held in trust for park purposes. Also of note, Lot 6 is subject to an easement in favour of an adjoining owner (see Attachment 2 identifying easement area) with such easement being commented on later in this report.

Background to Lot 6 on RP138987

Lot 6 had its genesis in a subdivision of land which occurred in 1974. At that time, Council had approved a subdivision which required a dedication of land for park purposes and a number of issues arose pertaining to the placement of the park area in the context of the parent parcel. Inadvertently, the survey plan creating the subdivision was endorsed by Council allowing it to progress to registration. While Lot 6 thereon, the intended park dedication area, proceeded to be placed in the open space zone under the Planning Scheme, it did not get transferred to the City. As a consequence, Lot 6 remained in the name of the original landowner.

In the early 2000s, a request from an adjoining owner to run a Telstra conduit through Lot 6 to serve Lot 1 on SP100883 (Lot 1) gave rise to questions on the ownership issues pertaining to Lot 6. It would seem that ‘local knowledge’ was that Lot 6 was in Council ownership/control as parkland, or at least should have been.

Interestingly, Council rate records showed Council as the owner of Lot 6, as did the records of the Valuer General, this despite the Titles Registry showing the lot in private ownership. The source of truth for land interests in Queensland is of course the Titles Registry and as a consequence, both Council records and those of the Valuer General were amended to confirm that Lot 6 was, and always had been, in private ownership.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 220 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 6 (Continued) HISTORY AND FUTURE DEALING WITH COUNCIL FREEHOLD LOT 6 ON RP138987 – CURRUMBIN VALLEY PN125059/16/-(P5)

City Officers then progressed enquiries with the Solicitors who dealt with the land transaction matters in 1974 for the original landowner, ultimately to no avail as the advice received was that all historic files had been destroyed. Additionally, enquiries were directed to the original landowner personally with a request that transfer documentation be executed, again to no avail as that landowner was of the view that his interest in Lot 6 had long ago transferred to the City for parkland.

In 2007, a formal request was directed to the original landowner seeking his execution of provided transfer documentation to enable Lot 6 to transfer to the City. This request resulted in advices being received that the original landowner was in ill health and family representatives would further consider the landowner’s ability to sign the required transfer documentation. Ultimately, the original landowner deceased finally closing that avenue to deal with ownership issues for Lot 6.

More recent history of Lot 6 and the adverse possession claim

A number of years passed with little action eventuating in respect of a transmission of interest in Lot 6, such that in June 2014 actions were put in train to raise rates against the lot as had always been required with the lot lying in private ownership. At that time, the thinking was that in the case that rates were not paid Lot 6 could then be disposed of / passed into Council via a sale of land process. However, what happened next was quite unexpected in that upon the issue of the rates notice the rates were paid, presumably by a member of the late landowner’s family.

Also unexpected, the landowners for Lot 1 started a dialogue with City Officers in early 2015 advising that representatives of the late landowner’s family had visited Lot 6 informing them that the land was ‘now theirs’ to develop for future residential purposes. This alarmed the landowners of Lot 1 for reasons that will become apparent in due course.

However by February 2015, despite the history at that stage, dealings with Lot 6 appeared to be becoming clearer. Comments were being received from the prior landowner’s family confirming transmission matters were being attended to with a view to subsequent transfer of Lot 6 to Council, finally achieving what was originally intended in 1974. Additionally, the landowners for Lot 1 indicated some comfort existed from the fact that Lot 6 would not be developed for residential use and would be transferred to the City as parkland.

Some months passed before transmission by death documentation was lodged for Lot 6 with the Titles Registry. That lodgement occurred in July 2015, at which time it was uncovered that the landowners for Lot 1 had lodged a prior claim for adverse possession over Lot 6, with such having occurred in May 2015. Due to the claim for adverse possession preceding the transmission by death documentation, the adverse possession claim would need to be dealt with first.

A claim for adverse possession dates back to medieval times in England but in a practical sense in Queensland today, equates to a squatter on land being able to dispossess a paper owner (holder of title via the Titles Registry) by possessing land for a requisite period (12 years) without the consent of the holder of the title.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 221 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 6 (Continued) HISTORY AND FUTURE DEALING WITH COUNCIL FREEHOLD LOT 6 ON RP138987 – CURRUMBIN VALLEY PN125059/16/-(P5)

It is unnecessary to dwell on the adverse possession claim, other than to make a few observations. Firstly, the claim for adverse possession always faced considerable hurdles, evident by the lack of precedent for a successful claim in Queensland. And perhaps more relevantly, that the claim for adverse possession would need to be made out by the landowners of Lot 1, that is, that they had in effect been a squatter on Lot 6 for at least 12 years without the consent of the owner of the land identified in the Titles Registry.

It was not until November 2017 that the adverse possession claim was finally resolved on the basis of rejection by the Registrar of Titles. The transmission by death documentation registered shortly thereafter, as did a transfer of Lot 6 to Council to be held in trust for park purposes. That however was not the end of the matter.

Application for the purchase of Lot 6

In December 2017, the landowners for Lot 1 on SP100883 met with City Officers to discuss a potential purchase of the City’s Lot 6.

The Local Government Regulation (LGR) prescribes the process by which a local government can dispose of land, with auction or tender processes the starting point for consideration.

However, provisions exist at section 236 of the LGR whereby a local government can dispose of land in priority to one party without resort to auction or tender processes. In the subject matter, the application from the landowner of Lot 1 could conceivably enliven s236(1)(c)(iv) of the LGR in that an exception from auction or tender processes can exist if (excerpt from LGR in part);

(iv) the land is disposed of to a person who owns adjoining land if- (A) the land is not suitable to be offered for disposal by tender or auction for a particular reason, including, for example, the size of the land or the existence of particular infrastructure on the land; and (B) there is not another person who owns other adjoining land who wishes to acquire the land; and (C) it is in the public interest to dispose of the land without a tender or auction; and (D) the disposal is otherwise in accordance with sound contracting principles.

By reference to Attachment 2, it is evident that the majority of Lot 6 is encumbered in favour of Lot 1 by way of an easement which provides for both access and services. That said, it is quite conceivable that Lot 6 would have enough area for a house to be constructed or for the lot to be put to effective use for other pursuits without conflict with the existing easement rights in favour of Lot 1. However, as noted previously in this report, Lot 6 does lie in the open space zone under the City Plan which would necessitate some initial steps should a public auction/tender process be instituted. Each of the above issues could go towards proper consideration by Council of the LGR provisions in (A) above.

In respect of the LGR provisions at (B) above, Attachment 1 identifies that three separate parcels (Lot 1, Lot 12 on SP100883 and Lot 2 on RP149730) all share a common boundary with Lot 6 and thus, each would be deemed an adjoining owner to Lot 6. Initial consideration of this aspect led to the owner of Lot 2 on RP149730 confirming that no interest was held in securing title to Lot 6.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 222 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 6 (Continued) HISTORY AND FUTURE DEALING WITH COUNCIL FREEHOLD LOT 6 ON RP138987 – CURRUMBIN VALLEY PN125059/16/-(P5)

However, the owner of Lot 12 on SP100883 has expressed an interest in acquiring Lot 6 should it be available for purchase. Accordingly, with more than one owner of a lot adjoining Lot 6 expressing an interest in acquiring Lot 6, the necessary conclusion to then reach is that a sale to an adjoining owner cannot be pursued by way of an exception provided by s236(1)(c)(iv) of the LGR. That is, a disposal could then only proceed by way of an auction or tender process.

For completeness, the owner of Lot 1 has suggested that their purchase application should be given consideration on a priority basis in the context of their prior ‘exclusive’ use of Lot 6 for many years, the existence of the easement through Lot 6 serving their adjacent lot and that the lot does, for all intents and again for many years, appear to all as being part of their landholdings.

Of course, the counter argument can also be a relevant consideration – that in law the applicant has been a squatter on Lot 6 for many years by their own admission via the adverse possession claim, they have been aware for many years they do not own Lot 6 but have a mere easement right over part of it and that as there is an acknowledged interest by more than one adjoining owner to Lot 6 in acquiring the lot, much less the potential interest of the wider public which as yet has not even been canvassed, that any sale in priority to one party could not be favourably considered.

Is Lot 6 needed for park purposes?

Noting all of the above, it is nevertheless important that Council form a view at first instance as to whether Lot 6 is needed by the City for park purposes and if that answer is yes, the response to the purchase application will be to simply refuse the application.

On this aspect, some fundamental matters need consideration:

(a) Lot 6 should have been transferred to the City for park purposes in 1974 but that has only as recent as late 2017 been achieved; (b) until late 2017, evidence from City files and that uncovered as part of the adverse possession claim process is that Lot 6 has been, for all intents, used by the owner of Lot 1 and while the lot remained in private ownership in the Titles Registry, the City was not able to assert any rights in respect of management and control for the site; (c) Lifestyle and Community Services Officers have not, even now, considered the relevance of Lot 6 to the City park network because it has never been seen to be in City ownership; and (d) perhaps of principle importance, that Lot 6 was in fact transferred to the City in late 2017 to be held in trust for park purposes.

On (d) above, there can be no doubt that from 1974 until today, a number of parties are very much aware of at least part of the travails that have occurred around land ownership, first and foremost the original landowner’s family that ultimately arranged the transfer of Lot 6 to the City.

Under the circumstances, for the City to accept a transfer of a lot for it to be held in trust and then move in short term to dispose of the parcel (by whatever means) could well be interpreted, and perhaps quite correctly, that the City had acted disingenuously in respect of accepting the land transfer as it did.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 223 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 6 (Continued) HISTORY AND FUTURE DEALING WITH COUNCIL FREEHOLD LOT 6 ON RP138987 – CURRUMBIN VALLEY PN125059/16/-(P5)

For completeness, there are some dated comments on City files from officers suggesting that the convoluted history pertaining to land ownership coupled with incorrect City records in respect of ownership would suggest that Lot 6 be disposed of by whatever means. That however is a short term view – Lot 6 now comprises an asset of the City and it is held in trust for the general public.

Recently, officers from Catchment Management have provided comment that Lot 6 could well prove to be a strategic asset – riparian restoration actions, access to and monitoring of water quality in Currumbin Creek, bank stability issues etc. Accordingly, retention of Lot 6 as a City asset for such reasons, irrespective public access being a less known aspect for present purposes, seems an entirely reasonable outcome on the current purchase/disposal question.

Many lots across the City are held in trust but are not used by the public nor can it be envisaged what future use could be made of them. However, the City is growing and certainly there has been no concerted move to date to sell off parkland areas – in fact, open space areas have been jealously guarded such that future generations and their needs are not prejudiced by injudicious decisions made at a point in time. Of added relevance to that perspective is that the financial return from a sale of Lot 6 would be quite modest and of little more than passing note in terms of the City budgetary position.

In respect of City lots held for open space purposes but not used by the wider public, it is not uncommon that adjoining owners are offered licences to use those areas for grazing and other such low impact uses until such time as the public need is identified warranting the opening up of the land (and termination of licence/s to adjoining owner/s). In respect of Lot 6, it is quite clear that the owner of Lot 1 has treated the lot as part of their landholding for many years such that if any licence is to issue it would be to that party. Delegations exist within Property Services Branch to issue such licences as and when considered appropriate.

Finally, it does need to be acknowledged that Lot 6 may never move to being opened up to satisfy an identified public open space need, that is, as time passes it is recognised that the lot is in fact surplus to needs and able to be disposed of. However, the recommendations in this report do not suggest that such a determination be made today, that some time pass such that true and proper consideration be given to the assessment of the public interest in Lot 6 as an open space asset. Accordingly, a sale of Lot 6 is not supported in the context of the current application received – at best, a licence be given consideration if the owner of Lot 1 and the City can agree to reasonable terms including the ability for the licence to be determined on short notice if deemed necessary.

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

Theme: Place 1.1 Our City provides a choice of liveable places 1.2 We live in balance with nature

Supporting the delivery of Gold Coast 2022

A We plan for the future of the City B We manage the City responsibly

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 224 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 6 (Continued) HISTORY AND FUTURE DEALING WITH COUNCIL FREEHOLD LOT 6 ON RP138987 – CURRUMBIN VALLEY PN125059/16/-(P5)

7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS

Not Applicable.

8 RISK MANAGEMENT

Not Applicable.

9 STATUTORY MATTERS

See the background to this report and references to potential disposal of land processes under the LGR.

10 COUNCIL POLICIES

Not Applicable.

11 DELEGATIONS

Delegation 472 – to issue minor or routine licences over City owned or controlled lands – enabling the grant of a licence to an adjoining owner provided the terms are deemed acceptable.

12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION

Not Applicable.

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS

Not Applicable.

14 TIMING

Not Applicable.

15 CONCLUSION

Council freehold Lot 6 on RP138987 in Currumbin Valley has had a chequered past but since late 2017, has come into City ownership to be held in trust for park purposes.

An adjoining owner has applied to purchase Lot 6 while yet a further adjoining owner has expressed an interest in acquiring the lot if it is proposed for disposal.

The Local Government Regulation prescribes that land be disposed of by public auction or tender processes other than where an exception from such a process is warranted. As noted in the background to this report, the circumstances applicable to the site are such that it is recommended that the site not be deemed surplus to City needs and thus not proposed for disposal.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 225 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 6 (Continued) HISTORY AND FUTURE DEALING WITH COUNCIL FREEHOLD LOT 6 ON RP138987 – CURRUMBIN VALLEY PN125059/16/-(P5)

16 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:

That both the applicant for purchase (owner of Lot 1 on SP100883) and the party confirming an interest in purchase (owner of Lot 12 on SP100883) of Council freehold Lot 6 on RP138987 be advised that the subject lot is not deemed surplus to City needs and thus will not be disposed of.

Author: Authorised by: Brendan Madden Grant Mather Executive Coordinator Property Management A/Director Organisational Services 16 July 2019 TRACKS REF: 73997542

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.006 moved Cr Owen-Jones seconded Cr PC Young

CARRIED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 226 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 6 (Continued) HISTORY AND FUTURE DEALING WITH COUNCIL FREEHOLD LOT 6 ON RP138987 – CURRUMBIN VALLEY PN125059/16/-(P5) Attachment 1: Cadastral Lots

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 227 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 6 (Continued) HISTORY AND FUTURE DEALING WITH COUNCIL FREEHOLD LOT 6 ON RP138987 – CURRUMBIN VALLEY PN125059/16/-(P5) Attachment 2: Easement Area

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 228 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 7 ORGANISATIONAL SERVICES CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL LG314/-/-(P6) Refer Attachment 1: City Contracting Plan 2018-19 Quarterly Amendment (1 April 2019 to 30 June 2019).

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY 1.1 I recommend that Attachment 1 be considered in Closed Session pursuant to section 275(1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the reason that the matter involves: (e) Contracts proposed to be made by it; 1.2 I recommend that Attachments 1 be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171(3) and 200(5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Not applicable.

3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

This report:

. provides a quarterly amendment (1 April to 30 June 2019) to the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 . provides a listing of contracts worth $200,000 or more awarded under Delegated Authority for 1 April to 30 June 2019

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS

Ex Minute G18.0621.050 (in part): 2. That Council adopts the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 (Attachment 1) with the following amendment: a) That all contracts with a designated ‘Sourcing Method’ of ‘Sole source’ be amended to a ‘Sourcing Method’ of ‘Quotation process’ where the estimated value of the contract is equal to or less than $250,000 and a ‘Sourcing Method’ of ‘Public Invitation to Offer (ITO)’ where the estimated value of the contract is greater than $250,000. 3. That the contracts referred to in part a. of recommendation 2 above are further investigated by officers and an amended City Contracting Plan 2018-19 be brought back to the next Events, Tourism and Governance Committee of 26 July 2018. 4. That a quarterly acquittal of the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 be submitted via the Events, Tourism and Governance Committee.

Ex Minute G18.0731.019 (in part): 2 That Council adopts the amendments to the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 (Attachment 1).

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 229 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL LG314/-/-(P6)

Ex Minute G18.1207.015 (in part): 2. That the quarterly acquittal (1 July to 30 September 2018) to the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 be noted.

3. That the contracts worth $200,000 or more awarded under Delegated Authority for the period of 1 July to 30 September 2018 be noted.

4. That Council adopts the amended City Contracting Plan 2018-19.

Ex Minute G19.0312.014 (in part): 2. That the quarterly acquittal (1 October to 31 December 2018) to the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 be noted. 3. That the contracts worth $250,000 or more awarded under Delegated Authority for the period of 1 October to 31 December 2018 be noted. 4. That Council adopts the amended City Contracting Plan 2018-19.

Ex Minute G19.0312.014 (in part): 2. That the quarterly acquittal (1 January to 31 March 2019) to the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 be noted. 3. That the contracts worth $250,000 or more awarded under Delegated Authority for the period of 1 January to 31 March 2019 be noted. 4. That Council resolves that the suppliers included in Attachment 2 are either sole source or single source suppliers as nominated. 5. That Council adopts the amended City Contracting Plan 2018-19.

5 DISCUSSION

5.1 City Contracting Plan 2018-19

In June 2018, Council adopted the City Contracting Plan 2018-19, which defines the types of contracts to be made during the financial year. The City Contracting Plan is to be brought back to Council on a quarterly basis for any amendments, as well as an acquittal of the previous quarter’s activities.

Attachment 1 provides an acquittal against the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 for the period 1 April to 30 June 2019 (quarter 4).

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 230 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL LG314/-/-(P6)

Table 1 provides key City Contracting Plan metrics for quarter 4.

Table 1 – Quarter 4 Metrics

Attach Measure No. 1 Ref. Contracts identified on the City Contracting Plan to go to market in the 581 quarter (Q4) Contracts identified on the City Contracting Plan which actually went to A1 187 (32%) market in the quarter (Q4) Contracts identified on the City Contracting Plan which went to market in 42 A2 quarter (Q4) and which will be completed in 19-20 Contracts identified on the City Contracting Plan to be completed in the B 356 quarter (Q4) which were removed from the City Contracting Plan Additional Contracts which went to market in the quarter (Q4) which were C1 66 not on the City Contracting Plan Additional Contracts which went to market in quarter (Q4) and will be C2 28 completed in 19-20 which were not on the City Contracting Plan Total Contracts which went to market or completed in the quarter (Q4) 323

The City Contracting Plan 2018-19 identified 581 contracts to be out to market or completed in quarter 4. 187 of these contracts were completed or out to market in the quarter. 42 contracts went to market and will be awarded in 19-20. 356 contracts did not go to market in quarter 4. Another 66 contracts, which did not appear on the City Contracting Plan 2018-19, also went to market or were completed during the quarter. In total 323 contracts went to market or were completed in the quarter 4.

5.2 Contracts worth $200,000 or more awarded under Delegated Authority

Delegations to enter into vary or discharge contracts require a report to be presented to Council, listing all contracts entered into under delegated authority where the value of the contract is $200,000 or more.

Contracts awarded under Delegated Authority for the period of 1 April 2018 to 30 June 2019 are provided in Attachment 1.

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

The project is aligned with the following themes, outcomes and signature actions of the City Vision and Gold Coast 2022.

The City Contracting Plan 2018 -19 provides Council with direct alignment of procurement, contracting and disposal activities with the Corporate Plan and corporate strategies.

Supporting the Delivery of Gold Coast 2022 A. We plan for the future of the city.

We make good choices that create a better future for the Gold Coast Community

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 231 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL LG314/-/-(P6)

Manage the maintenance, renewal and delivery of infrastructure for the city through the Total Asset Management Plan and the forward Capital Works Program. B. We manage the city responsibly. Our stewardship of the city provides value for money to ratepayers Deliver a wide range of high quality services to the Gold Coast community (as identified in the annual Operational Plan).

7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS

Budget/Funding Considerations

The City Contracting Plan 2018-19 provides the anticipated contracting activities in relation to operational services that support the implementation of the activities and priorities of Council’s Programs and Services as defined in the Operational Plan 2018-19.

The ‘estimated value of contract(s)’ provides an estimate of the proposed contracting activities within approved annual budgets.

Costs for Capital Works and Service Proposals

The City Contracting Plan 2018-19 provides the capital works programs (programs are defined as the Four Year Works Program by Directorate and Budget Centre for 2018-19) and projects against which proposed procurement activities are scheduled to occur during the 2018-19 financial year and later.

In accordance with the budget review guidelines the following circumstances require referral to the Special Budget Committee

Where Water and Waste Capital Works projects require budget adjustments; the projects will be referred via the Water and Waste budget review where funds are available in the respective Reserves to cover the funding required to service the full commitment the contract will give rise to.

People and Culture

No extra staff will be required for this project.

8 RISK MANAGEMENT

Not applicable.

9 STATUTORY MATTERS

Section 220(7) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 provides that local governments may, by resolution, amend a contracting plan at any time before the end of the financial year to which the plan relates.

10 COUNCIL POLICIES

The procurement activities have been carried out in accordance with the requirements of Council’s Procurement Policy and Contract Manual.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 232 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL LG314/-/-(P6)

11 DELEGATIONS The City Contracting Plan details which contracts were awarded under delegated authority versus which contracts come back to Council for the award of the contract.

12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION Branch managers were engaged through periodic procurement partnering forums to provide updates to the City Contracting Plan 2018-19, as part of the quarterly acquittal process. Right to Information (RTI) and Information Privacy (IP) Legislation 2009 Not applicable. 13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS Not applicable. 14 TIMING Not applicable. 15 CONCLUSION

The City Contracting Plan 2018-19 identified 581 contracts to be out to market or completed in quarter 4. 187 of these contracts were completed or out to market in the quarter. 42 contracts went to market and will be awarded in 19-20. 356 contracts originally identified on the plan did not go to market in quarter 4. Another 66 contracts, which did not appear on the City Contracting Plan 2018-19, also went to market or were completed during the quarter. In total 323 contracts went to market or were completed in the quarter 4.

Approval is sought in accordance with section 220(7) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 to amend the City Contracting Plan 2018-19.

16 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:

1 That Attachment 1 be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171(3) and 200(5) of the Local Government Act 2009. 2 That the quarterly acquittal (1 April to 30 June 2019) to the City Contracting Plan 2018- 19 be noted (Attachment 1). 3 That the contracts worth $200,000 or more awarded under Delegated Authority for the period of 1 April to 30 June 2019 be noted.

Author: Authorised by: Scott Stewart Grant Mather Acting Chief Procurement Officer Acting Director Organisational Services 27 August 2019

TRACKS REF: #74092737, #73867115

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 233 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL LG314/-/-(P6)

Conflict of Interest – Cr Owen-Jones:

Pursuant to section 175E(2) of the Local Government Act 2009, I would like to inform the meeting that I have a personal interest in this matter, which I recognise may be a real or perceived conflict of interest the particulars of which are as follows:

The name of the person or entity is: Optus Administration The nature of the relationship is: Hospitality received during the GC2018 Commonwealth Games The value of the gift or benefit received is: More than $500 on 10 April 2018 The nature of the other person’s interest in the matter is: Contracts with the City of Gold Coast

PROCEDURAL MOTION moved Cr O'Neill seconded Cr Boulton Pursuant to section 175E(4)(a) of the Local Government Act 2009, Council resolves that: Cr Owen-Jones has a perceived conflict of interest in this matter as declared above.

CARRIED

In accordance with Section 175E(4) of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Owen-Jones did not vote.

PROCEDURAL MOTION moved Cr O'Neill seconded Cr Boulton Pursuant to section 175E(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 2009, Council resolves that: Cr Owen-Jones may participate in the meeting and vote on the matter because the interest is minor and of a remote nature.

CARRIED

In accordance with Section 175E(4) of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Owen-Jones did not vote.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ADOPTED BY COUNCIL 20 SEPTEMBER 2019

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.007 moved Cr Boulton seconded Cr O'Neill

1 That Attachment 1 be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171(3) and 200(5) of the Local Government Act 2009. 2 That the quarterly acquittal (1 April to 30 June 2019) to the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 be noted (Attachment 1). 3 That the contracts worth $200,000 or more awarded under Delegated Authority for the period of 1 April to 30 June 2019 be noted.

CARRIED

Cr Owen-Jones voted in the positive

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 234 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL LG314/-/-(P6)

COUNCIL MEETING 20 SEPTEMBER 2019

RESOLUTION G19.0920.022 moved Cr La Castra seconded Cr Tozer That Committee Recommendation ETG19.0917.007 be adopted as printed which reads as follows:- 1 That Attachment 1 be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171(3) and 200(5) of the Local Government Act 2009. 2 That the quarterly acquittal (1 April to 30 June 2019) to the City Contracting Plan 2018-19 be noted (Attachment 1). 3 That the contracts worth $200,000 or more awarded under Delegated Authority for the period of 1 April to 30 June 2019 be noted. CARRIED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 235 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Attachment 1 - Amended City Contracting Plan 2018-19 *Contract Type: S-Significant; D-Disposal; R-Revenue Grey lines below represent a completed contract **Estimated Value of Contracts excludes extension option(s) value

Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A1 - Contracts identified on the City Contracting Plan which actually went to market in the quarter (Q4) and were completed in Q4

A10005 Provision of licensing fees for e-water music Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation eWater Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000315722 to eWater Pty Ltd for $2,484 software maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10007 Development of oral history collection of the Culture Strategy Single source: It is in the public interest to single (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that it is in the public interest to Lesley Jenkins Contract awarded by PO 3000313869 to Leslie Jenkins Pty Ltd for $37,500 city 2023 source single source to Leslie Jenkins 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation A10011 Strategic city project Single source: It is in the public interest to single (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that it is in the public interest to Hassell Contract awarded by PO 3000223812 to Hassell Pty Ltd for $51,000 source single source to Hassell Ltd 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation * A10013 City plan policy development and drafting Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract awarded by PO 3000323236 to Ethos Urban Pty Ltd for $27,000 guideline

A10059 Condition assessment of retaining and Quotation process (i) 4 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/131 awarded to SMEC Australia Pty Ltd for $54,900 revetment walls

A10061 Condition assessment of fmd assets Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/217 awarded to Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd for $91,800 including minor culverts, surface drains, fittings, pits and A10065 Condition assessment, testing and design of Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/026A awarded to ADG Engineers (Aust) Pty Ltd for $346,117.00 road resurfacing Contract LG314/1211/19/026B awarded to Aussie Hydro-Vac Services Pty Ltd for $355,302.15 Contract LG314/1211/19/026C awarded to Oscorp Engineering Pty Ltd for $315,644.90 A10074 Licensing and maintenance of software by GC City Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Transoft Solutions Aust Contract awarded by PO 3000313847 to Transoft Solutions Aust Pty Ltd for $4,480 transoft solutions Transport maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd Strategy 2031 disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10081 Provision of line marking services City Operational Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/066A awarded to Allstate Linemarking Services Pty Ltd for $3,184,699.84 Plan Contract LG314/690/19/066B awarded to Avante Linemarking Queensland for $225,823.00 Contract LG314/690/19/066C awarded to Global Linemarking Services Pty Ltd for $2,282,193.24

A10082 Provision of maintenance services for traffic City Operational Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 2 years (+3 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Contract be brought Contract LG314/690/19/058 awarded to DM Roads for $3,249,199 signals Plan back to Council for consideration * A10085 National broadband network and services City Operational Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation NBN Co LTD Contract LG314/1210/19/004C awarded to NBN CO LIMITED for $12,408.50 agreement Plan goods or services being sought has no suitable alternatives available * A10092 Wayfinding GC City Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that the unique or proprietary Harlequin Signs Contract LG314/1211/19/086 awarded to Harlequin Signs for $88,947 Transport goods or services being sought has no suitable nature of the goods or services being sought has no Strategy 2031 alternatives available suitable alternatives available 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Harlequin Signs *

A10093 Separated cycleway concept design GC City Quotation process (i) 5 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/192 awarded to GHD Pty Ltd for $160,875 Transport Strategy 2031 A10095 Freight network plan GC City Quotation process (i) 9 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/183 awarded to Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Ltd for $234,132 Transport Strategy 2031 A10122 Culvert renewal at sarawak ave near laguna Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/20/001 awarded to SMEC Australia Pty Ltd for $86,550 lake

A10127 Boardwalk renewal kirra point Ocean Beaches Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 26 Weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/039 awarded to Ecospec Pty Ltd for $2,226,375 Strategy 2013- 23 A10129 Rehabilitation of napper road major culvert Quotation process (i) 1 year 26 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/214 awarded to Burchills Engineering Solutions for $95,980.00

A10130 Rehabilitation of gardenia drive steel arch Quotation process (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/20/001 awarded to SMEC Australia Pty Ltd for $86,550 bridge

A10131 Repair Coplicks Bridge Tallebudgera Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/224 awarded to Burchills Engineering Solutions for $93,740.00 Connection Road

A10132 Replace bridge barriers Gold Coast Highway Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 16 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/040 awarded to Ecospec Pty Ltd for $822,464.10 Surfers Paradise

A10149 Water taxi service for south stradbroke island Quotation process (i) 2 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/19/070 awarded to In Zane Water Taxis for $41,300

A10150 Supply and delivery of cationic rapid setting Quotation process (i) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/18/099A awarded to Downers EDI Works for $59,000 bitumen emulsion Contract LG314/690/18/099B awarded to Fulton Hogan Industries Pty Ltd for $49,500

A10164 Flooded road signage clagiraba rd Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/061 awarded to Aquamonix Pty Ltd for $378,815 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 236 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10221 Specialist engineering services for the Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a ARUP Contract LG314/621/19/063 awarded to ARUP for $31,910 delivery of the gc cultural precinct engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to ARUP

A10226 Licensing software by our community pty ltd Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Our Community Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000297444 to Our Community Pty Ltd for $18,181.82 maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10242 Provision of deep-freeze software licences, Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Aussie Telecom Pty Contract awarded by PO 3000214356 to Aussie Telecom Pty Ltd for $38,712.36 maintenance and support maintenance to existing systems making it Limited disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10252 Provision of print serials City Operational Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (i) 2 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Ebsco Aust Subscription Various contracts awarded by POs to Ebsco Aust Subscription Services for $267,848 Plan * Services A10260 Provision of an externally hosted online Sole source: (i) 6 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Community Information Contract awarded by PO 3000286163 to Bang the Table Pty Ltd for $30,500 directory of community organisations, Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Support Services Ltd services and faciliti where alternatives do not practically exist * A10261 Servicing, repairs, maintenance, replacement Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 2 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Dominica Sound Pty Ltd Contract LG314/690/19/008A awarded to Adigitalife Distribution Pty Ltd for $12,900 and supply and install of specialised suite of system/equipment/proprietary item/brand Contract LG314/690/19/008B awarded to Resolve Technical Solutions for $14,681 audio vi A10316 Management of youth services for various Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Contract be brought Contract LG314/411/19/037 awarded to Wesley Mission Queensland for $1,644,362.37 community centres back to Council for consideration * A10319 Provision of datacom it of magic box utilised Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Datacom Systems Pty Contract awarded by PO 3000307873 to Datacom Systems Pty Ltd for $13,000 in city libraries maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10329 Urban heritage and character study - Culture Strategy Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/082 awarded to Conrad Gargett for $94,500 consultancy study 2023

A10335 Design, Supply and Installation of a Storage City Operational Quotation Process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/18/131 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $151,908.62 Shed at Coomera Indoor Sports Centre Plan

A10362 Reisenwebber skate park renewal City Operational Quotation process (i) 2 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/128 awarded to Concreed for $189,964.60 Plan

A10372 Markeri street retaining wall - removal of Quotation process (ii) 10 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/110 awarded to Coastal Asbestos Removal for $88,118 asbestos and landscape reinstatement and tree planting A10413 General electrical energex maintenance Sole source: Statement of licence, legislated (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Energex Contract LG314/1210/19/002I awarded to Energex for $620.34 servicing and repairs requirements, third party ownership of assets or Contract LG314/1210/19/002J awarded to Energex for $382.80 industry regulated standards making it impractical to Contract LG314/1210/19/002K awarded to Energex for $42,193.96 invite quotes/tenders Contract LG314/1210/19/002L awarded to Energex for $382.80 Contract LG314/1210/19/002N awarded to Energex for $9,146.25 Contract LG314/1210/19/002M awarded to Energex for $279.51 A10439 Inspection, treatment, reporting and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Contract LG314/690/19/005A awarded to J & P Richardson Industries Pty Ltd for $883,250 maintenance of poles brought back to Council for consideration Contract LG314/690/19/005B awarded to Mambre Pty Ltd for $937,200

A10459 Design, drafting and engineering consultancy Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 2 years (+1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/18/086A awarded to ADG Engineers (Aust) Pty Ltd for $29,928 package for various infrastructure delivery Contract LG314/621/18/086B awarded to Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Ltd for $252,781 projects Contract LG314/621/18/086C awarded to Australasian Marine Associates Pty. Ltd. for $12,300 Contract LG314/621/18/086D awarded to Bellwether Consulting Services Pty Ltd for $7,600 Contract LG314/621/18/086E awarded to Burchills Engineering Solutions for $223,658 Contract LG314/621/18/086 awarded to Calibre Professional Services Pty Ltd for $223,881 Contract LG314/621/18/086G awarded to Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd for $223,658 Contract LG314/621/18/086H awarded to Design Flow Unit Trust for $12,300 Contract LG314/621/18/086I awarded to Ganden Engineers and Project Managers for $51,454 Contract LG314/621/18/086J awarded to Gleeds Australia (East) Pty Ltd for $7,600 Contract LG314/621/18/086K awarded to Ranbury Management Group Pty Ltd for $7,600 Contract LG314/621/18/086M awarded to RoadNet Pty Ltd for $164,208 Contract LG314/621/18/086N awarded to SMEC Australia Pty Ltd for $245,182 Contract LG314/621/18/086O awarded to Turner & Townsend Thinc Pty Ltd for $7,600 Contract LG314/621/18/086P awarded to Water Technology Pty Ltd for $12,300 A10465 Waterside courtyard upgrade Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 6 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/050 awarded to Kane Constructions (QLD) Pty Ltd for $702,947.56

A10475 Supply and installation of coloured pavement Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/146 awarded to BrickNPave for $237,889.40 coatings Contract LG314/1211/19/104 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A10483 Provision of waste edge software Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation GMT Software Australia Contract awarded by PO 3000292894 to GMT Software Australia Pty Ltd for $156,300.88 maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10494 Supply and maintenance of static waste Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/055 awarded to TEW Pty Ltd for $158,345 compactors

A10505 Signage manufacturer to construct recycled Solid Waste Quotation process (i) 6 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/103 awarded to Signcraft Pty Ltd for $172,410 street concept for molendinar, reedy creek Strategy 2024 and merrimac A10512 Professional services for network Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation SCADA Engineering Pty Contract awarded by PO 3000239804 to Scada engineering Pty Ltd for $130,000 assessment and security enhancement for available Ltd waste and water scada syst * 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 237 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10513 Provision of expert advice/consulting for a Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Continuity of a Griffith University Contract LG314/621/18/209 awarded to Griffith University for $86,000.00 range of water quality issues and monitoring engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Griffith * University

A10523 Corporate membership: queensland water Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Queensland Water Contract awarded by PO 3000288892 to Queensland Water Directorate for $47,819 directorate, queensland based industry body Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Directorate Institute of where alternatives do not practically exist * Public Works A10524 Supply of clear scada licensing for the Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Schneider Electric Aust Contract awarded by PO 3000319726 to Schneider Electric Aust Pty Ltd for $34,312.20 sewage network scada system - schneider maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd electric australia disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10525 Proprietary ownership of telstra infrastructure Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Telstra Corporation Contract LG314/1210/19/003K awarded to Telstra Corporation Limited for $133,983.19 - works to be undertaken by telstra or goods or services being sought has no suitable Limited Contract LG314/1210/19/003L awarded to Telstra Corporation Limited for $6,890.53 approved cont alternatives available A10526 Corporate membership: water services Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Water Services Assoc. Various contracts awarded by POs to Water Services Assoc. Of Aust. for $78,200 association Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Of Aust. Water Services where alternatives do not practically exist * Association A10527 Corporate membership for the australian Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Australian Water Contract awarded by PO 3000288990 to Australian Water Association Ltd for $1,136.36 water association Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Association Ltd where alternatives do not practically exist * A10533 The university of queensland (the advanced Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a University of Various contracts awarded by POs to The University of Queensland (The Advanced Water Management Centre) water management centre) - expertise on engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Queensland for $93,045.45 wastewater treat expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to The University of Queensland (The Advanced Water * Management Centre)

A10542 Uniquest (Uni of Qld): provision of SeweX Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Uniquest Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000272926 to Uniquest Pty Ltd for $115,150.00 (Advanced Mathematical Modelling Tool), maintenance to existing systems making it recycled water mat disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10548 Maintenance services for odour control Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/068 awarded to Rick Webb Odour Control Services for $464,250 system equipment

A10550 Removal of regulated waste from sewage Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Contract LG314/411/19/041 awarded to Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd for $746,330.48 treatment plants brought back to Council for consideration * A10552 Service and maintenance for industrial gas Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/081 awarded to Eneraque Pty Ltd for $74,708 fired equipment

A10569 Maintenance of air compressors, air blowers Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/048 awarded to Cospaker Pneumatics for $102,831 and air dryers

A10573 Nutrient analyser maintenance at sewerage Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/050 awarded to Thermo Fisher Scientific Australia Pty Ltd for $141,944.86 treatment plants

A10575 Maintenance and calibration of gas monitors Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/049 awarded to Air-Met Scientific Pty Ltd for $56,345

A10593 Upgrade potable water filling station Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 9 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/097 awarded to Diona Pty Ltd for $3,406,692.85

A10604 Supply and delivery of chemicals Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv)S 3 years (+3 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Contract LG314/411/19/053 awarded to Calix limited for $1,650,018.00 be brought back to Council for consideration Contract LG314/411/19/053 awarded to Coogee QCA Pty Ltd for $6,380,752.00 Contract LG314/411/19/053 awarded to Grenof Pty Ltd for $533,891.00 * Contract LG314/411/19/053 awarded to Omega Chemicals for $549,619.00 Contract LG314/411/19/053 awarded to SNF (Australia) Pty Limited for $2 450 880 15 A10613 Public wi-fi Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/017 Public W awarded to Vocus Communications for $611,820.00

A10621 Digital city – panel for design and/or Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv)S 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Contract LG314/765/19/001A awarded to Fibre Network Engineering for $10,000,000 construct / for telecoms infrastructure be brought back to Council for consideration Contract LG314/765/19/001B awarded to Universal Communications Group Ltd for $10,000,000 Contract LG314/765/19/001C awarded to Visionstream Australia Pty Limited for $10,000,000 Contract LG314/1211/19/092 awarded to Fibre Network Engineering for $958,375 * Contract LG314/1211/19/123 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 Contract LG314/1211/19/129 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A10628 Training for the public sector on Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Queensland Contract awarded by PO 3000317499 to Queensland Ombudsman for $9,750 administrative practice Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Ombudsman Office Of where alternatives do not practically exist * The Queensland Ombudsman A10630 Job evaluation manager (jem) and paynet Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Hays Specialist Contract awarded by PO 3000293963 to Hay Group Pty Ltd for $26,284 subscription service maintenance to existing systems making it Recruitment (Australia) disadvantageous or impractical to invite Pty Ltd quotes/tenders * A10637 Media streaming solution for council Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Interstream Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000275018 to Interstream Pty Ltd for $15,120 meetings maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 238 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10642 Annual ICT license and support - idea Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation CaseWare Australia and Contract awarded by PO 3000311480 to CaseWare Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd for $2,800 specialised auditing software program maintenance to existing systems making it New Zealand Task disadvantageous or impractical to invite Technology Pty Ltd quotes/tenders * A10644 Support and delivery of internal audit plan Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/245 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A10647 Provision of banking and financial services Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iv)S 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Commonwealth Bank of Contract LG314/1210/19/008 awarded to Commonwealth Bank of Australia for $3,355,162 be brought back to Council for consideration * Australia A10649 Replacement whs City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Netsight Contract awarded by PO 3000288948 to Netsight T/A Myosh Pty Ltd for $69,420.00 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10659 Offsite storage of archived records Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Contract LG314/411/19/020 awarded to Grace Records Management (Australia) Pty Ltd for $597,384 brought back to Council for consideration * A10668 Rightfax Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation CPS Technology Group Contract awarded by PO 3000286090 to Open Text Pty Ltd for $11,736.50 maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10672 Software modelling solution for the local Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Integran Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000291761 to Integran Pty Ltd for $50,000 government infrastructure plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10673 Takadu software implementation Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Takadu Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000314133 to Takadu Pty Ltd for $232,000 maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10690 Oracle tuxedo - named user & concurrent Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Oracle Corporation Aust Contract LG314/1185/14/033 awarded to Oracle Corporation Aust Pty Ltd for $56,104.90 licences, support and maintenance maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10693 Lawmaster - licences, support and Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Law Master Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000313659 and 3000302642 to Law Master Pty Ltd for $43,892.60 maintenance goods or services being sought has no suitable alternatives available A10694 Provision of mail services Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (iv) 2 Years (+2 x 1 Year) Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature Australian Postal Contract LG314/411/19/045 awarded to Australia Post - 5584249 Mail Opening Account for $7,133,818 are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous Corporation to undertake a competitive process or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be brought back to Council for consideration *

A10701 Licensing and maintenance of software by Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Quest Software Contract awarded by PO 3000317400 to Quest Software Int. Ltd T/A Spectra Quest Pty Ltd for $8,170 spectra quest australia pty ltd maintenance to existing systems making it International Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10706 Provision of web content management Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Open Text Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000286500 to Open Text Pty Ltd for $35,213.23 system maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10708 Alcom security group provide specialist and Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Alcorn Security Group Contract awarded by PO 3000239804 to Alcom Security Pty Ltd for $130,000 sensitive security consulting, advisory and goods or services being sought has no suitable penetration alternatives available * A10710 Licenses, support and maintenance of Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Client Software Contract awarded by PO 3000314926 to Client Software International for $39,375.00 wincom4xp / wincom4win7 maintenance to existing systems making it International Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite * A10714 Secondary data centre Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Digital Sense Hosting Contract LG314/1185/19/027 awarded to Digital Sense Hosting Pty Ltd for $1,990,800 system/equipment/proprietary item/brand brought back to Council for consideration * * Pty Ltd A10715 Procure and implement a cloud access Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/011 awarded to RIOT Solutions Pty Ltd for $686,842.11 security broker technology

A10729 F5 hardware and software maintenance and Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/032 awarded to Fujitsu Australia Pty Ltd for $107,817.77 support

A10733 Ongoing licencing, support and maintenance Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Innovyze Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000293199 to Innovyze Pty Ltd for $4,165 to existing systems, xp software maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10736 Fleet acquisition- trucks cab chassis Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iii) 1 Year Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract No new activity (close out) be brought back to Council for consideration * A10737 Fleet acquisition - specialised truck bodies Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/17/005AO Q12/1 awarded to James Frizelle's Automotive Group for $253,666.14 trailers 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 239 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10738 Plant acquisition - machinery equipment Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/17/007CR Q43/1 awarded to CJD EQUIPMENT PTY LTD for $654,600.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007CS Q75/1 awarded to Jetco Engineering Pty Ltd for $109,760.00 Contract LG314/411/17/006H Q65/1 awarded to Custom TT Pty Ltd for $58,520.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007CT Q52/1 awarded to Teammoto Honda Gold Coast for $47,173.50 Contract LG314/411/17/007CU Q52/1 awarded to Teammoto Honda Gold Coast for $58,238.20 Contract LG314/411/17/007CV Q58/1 awarded to Sales & Service Australia for $45,100.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007CX Q82/1 awarded to Mower World Commercial Pty Ltd for $120,900.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007CY Q88/1 awarded to Vermeer Equipment Holdings Pty Ltd for $64,950.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007CZ Q87/1 awarded to Tradelink Plumbing Supplies for $102,284.01 Contract LG314/411/17/007DA Q98/1 awarded to Tradelink Plumbing Supplies for $55,794.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007DB Q95/1 awarded to Chesterfield Australia Pty Ltd for $24,545.45 Contract LG314/411/17/007DD Q23/1 awarded to Burson Auto Parts for $21,490.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007DE Q23/1 awarded to Cornish Lubrication Services for $24,774.82 Contract LG314/411/17/007DG Q84/1 awarded to Traymark Industrial Caravans Pty Ltd for $277,216.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007DI Q99/1 awarded to SAFETY STORE PTY LTD for $36,108.54 A10740 Register of prequalified suppliers for the Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv)S 1 Year (+2 x 1 Year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Contract LG314/411/19/008 awarded to register of prequalified suppliers for the intermittent hire of trucks and intermittent hire of trucks and plant be brought back to Council for consideration * plant for $24,800,000 A10762 Maintenance of fire protection systems and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 2 Years (+2 x 1 Year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/18/037 awarded to Advance Fire Technology Pty Ltd for $1,154,496.96 equipment

A10775 Smec pavement management software (pms) Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (iii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Smec Australia Pty Ltd Contract LG314/1185/14/037 awarded to SMEC Australia Pty Ltd for $14,906.99 maintenance to existing systems making it 1) Contract type changed to (i) disadvantageous or impractical to invite 2) Estimated contract value changed to $14,906.99 quotes/tenders A10792 Nerang air conditioning replacement Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/079 awarded to System Air Pty Ltd for $148,960.00

A10794 Refurbishment of karp court, bundall Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/094 awarded to Construct Waterproofing Pty Ltd for $195,106.00

A10795 Fluentbooks for project online edition 5.1 City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation FluentPro Software Contract awarded by PO 3000289668 to FluentPro Software Corporation for $11,106.70 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Corporation disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10796 Capix treasury manager (ctm) City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation CAPIX Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000299323 toAssurex Escrow Pty Ltd for $2,080.00 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10797 Cisco webex subscription Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Dimension Data Aust Pty Contract awarded by PO 3000309504 to Dimension Data Aust Pty Ltd for $10,793.87 maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10798 E-recruitment software licences City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Equifax and Fit2Work Contract awarded by PO 3000302580 to Mercury Search & Selection Pty Ltd for $36,860.00 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10799 Thomson reuters - onesource fbt City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Thomson Reuters Contract awarded by PO 3000309997 to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Pty Ltd for $10,081.69 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it (Professional) Australia disadvantageous or impractical to invite Limited quotes/tenders * A10804 Oce australia - supply of toner to city of gold City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation OCE Australia Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000298405 to Nearmap Australia Pty Ltd for $15,464.42 coast print room machinery Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10806 Tuflow (EP&E) and city infrastructure City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation BMT EASTERN Contract LG314/1185/13/027 awarded to BMT WBM Pty Ltd for $32,000 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it AUSTRALIA PTY LTD disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10808 Atlas id and profile id City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation I D Consulting Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000317868 to I D Consulting Pty Ltd for $22,700.00 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10811 Provision of licensing, supply and support of City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation I D Consulting Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000317823 to I D Consulting Pty Ltd for $18,000 economy id software Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10812 Nearmap subscription (Parks & OCEO) City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Nearmap Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000298405 to Nearmap Australia Pty Ltd for $15,464.42 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10813 Wasteman 2g City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Newcastle Weighing Contract awarded by PO 3000319793 to Newcastle Weighing Services for $15,000 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Services Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10814 Provision of security to the city's ssl City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Entrust Datacard Entrust Contract awarded by PO 3000315415 to Entrust Datacard Pty Ltd for $15,352.15 certificates - entrust Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10815 Provision of CA (Clarity) proprietary software City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Fujitsu Australia Limited Contract awarded by PO 3000283559 to Fujitsu Australia Limited for $12,975 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10816 Provision of pharos software - city libraries pc City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation EEMS Technologies Pty Contract awarded by PO 3000275449 to EEMS Technologies Pty Ltd for $11,232 booking system Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd ATF Fairclough disadvantageous or impractical to invite Family Trust quotes/tenders * A10817 Property development (pd) online application Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation CIVICA Pty Limited Contract awarded by PO 3000285138 to CIVICA Pty Limited for $12,000 software licences maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 240 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10821 Microstran and microstation advanced select City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Bentley Systems Contract awarded by PO 3000299581 to Bentley Systems Pty Ltd for $6,260 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it International Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10822 Red hat linux server City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Datacom Systems Pty Contract awarded by PO 3000313091 to Datacom Systems Pty Ltd for $5,200 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10823 Provision of e3learning solutions City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Interact Learning Pty Ltd Contract LG314/1185/19/071 awarded to Kineo for $6,150.00 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10824 Autoturn & guidsign City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Transoft Solutions Aust Contract awarded by PO 3000313847 to Transoft Solutions Aust Pty Ltd for $4,480 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10827 Internet data services for cocg - tertiary link City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Optus Billing Services Contract awarded by PO 3000288485 to Optus Billing Services Pty Ltd for $9,600 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10828 Nintex workflow 2010 enterprise City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Myriad Technologies Pty Contract awarded by PO 3000308343 to Myriad Technologies Pty Ltd for $9,890 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10829 Slope/w 2018 City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Ceanet Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000298073 to Ceanet Pty Ltd for $1,290 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10831 Circly licence maintenance and support City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Mincad Systems Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000286139 to MINCAD Systems Pty Ltd for $7,018.68 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10832 Hosting with maintenance - live traffic status City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation CoastalCOMS Contract awarded by PO 3000293200 to Coastal Coms Pty Ltd for $9,720 at helensvale waste and recycling centre Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10833 Matlab and simulink City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation The Mathworks Australia Contract awarded by PO 3000282298 to The Mathworks Australia Pty Ltd for $4,320 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10834 Glass's software subscription Gold Coast Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Glass's Information Contract awarded by PO 3000293264 to Glass's Information Services Pty Ltd for $5,000 2022, City maintenance to existing systems making it Services Pty Ltd Operational disadvantageous or impractical to invite Plan quotes/tenders * A10835 Aimsun 8 advanced City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Legion Limited Contract awarded by PO 3000311747 to Aimsun Pty Ltd for $5,000 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10838 Cemeteries management information system City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Aptean (Australia) Pty Contract awarded by PO 3000291580 to Aptean (Australia) Pty Ltd for $3,151.80 Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10843 Digital city - o&m Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/045 awarded to Universal Communications Group Ltd for $1,800,000.00

A10864 Stage 2 augmentation of the recycled water Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 9 months Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Contract LG314/1211/18/071 awarded to NTS Group Pty Ltd for $4,073,239.56 main from pimpama to coombabah brought back to Council for consideration * A10888 Preferred supplier arrangement for economic Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/077A awarded to Colliers International (Brisbane) Pty Ltd for $29,965.00 research Contract LG314/621/19/077B awarded to RPS Australia East Pty Ltd for $116,727.00 Contract LG314/621/19/077C awarded to Urbis Pty Ltd for $29,965.00 A10890 Certification of nature refuge agreement Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation The Queensland Trust Contract awarded by PO 3000303709 to The Queensland Trust for Nature for $3,900 goods or services being sought has no suitable for Nature G Marshall, A alternatives available * Volders, M Robson A10891 Policy review and methodology consultancy Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 8 weeks Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a CreativeMove Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000306462 to Creativemove Pty Ltd for $4,200 engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Creative * Move

A10902 Surface drains renewal cost benefit analysis Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 6 weeks Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a SMEC Australia Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000304249 to SMEC Australia Pty LTd for $14,350 engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to SMEC Australia Pty Ltd

A10909 Line of sight review between capex and lgip Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract awarded by PO 3000317149 to PSA Consulting Pty Ltd for $35,462 projects as well as review of their transparency A10910 Parking mobile payment and guidance Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/052 awarded to EasyPark ANZ Pty Ltd for $30,000.00 applications

A10929 Parking epermit software Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/061 awarded to CellOPark Australia Pty Ltd for $144,000.00 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 241 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10951 Fibre network connectivity manager Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature IISolutions Pty Ltd Contract LG314/1185/19/066 awarded to II Solutions Pty Ltd for $167,500 are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous to undertake a competitive process or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to II Solutions Pty Ltd *

A10964 Project curator for the water and waste urban Quotation process (ii) 14 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/091 awarded to Artwork Agency Pty Ltd for $115,578.00 art project 2018-2019, "water walls"

A10970 Planned maintenance and servicing of low Quotation process (ii) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/015 awarded to J & P Richardson Industries Pty Ltd for $481,405.38 voltage and high voltage electrical equipment

A10986 Planning and urban growth model Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Sizztech Contract LG314/621/19/098 awarded to Sizztech Pty Ltd for $91,500.00 goods or services being sought has no suitable Contract LG314/1185/19/043 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 alternatives available * A10996 Environmental data management system Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 6 years awarded for 3 Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Contract LG314/1185/19/025 awarded to SRA Information Technology for $490,633.37 years brought back to Council for consideration * A10999 Parking meter maintenance and support Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Global Integrated Contract LG314/1185/19/021 awarded to Global Integrated Solutions Limited for $1,206,715.00 maintenance to existing systems making it Solutions Limited disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A11000 Biggera creek dam safety review and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 10 months Q4 Contract(s) to be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/060 awarded to GHD Pty Ltd for $322,768.00 upgrade investigations

A11001 Licence plate recognition mobile units Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/033 awarded to Duncan Solutions Australia for $820,880.00

A11007 Supply and maintenance: heavy plant Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/17/007CP Q44/1 awarded to Hastings Deering (Australia) Limited for $464,800.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007CW Q50/1 awarded to Hastings Deering (Australia) Limited for $421,500.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007DC Q94/1 awarded to Hastings Deering (Australia) Limited for $1,068,000.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007DF Q78/1 awarded to United Forklift and Access Solutions for $95,900.00 Contract LG314/411/17/007DH Q80/1 awarded to Pulse Power Equipment for $79,980.00

A11008 Supply and maintenance: passenger and Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Various contracts awarded see below light vehicles

A11013 Supply and installation of in-ground vehicle Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Contract LG314/1185/19/024 awarded to Braums Pty Ltd for $3,218,365.00 detection sensors brought back to Council for consideration * A11016 Supply and maintenance: trucks 2t-8t Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/17/005BD Q64/1 awarded to Sci-Fleet Motors Pty Ltd for $143,882.96 Contract LG314/411/17/005BE Q74/1 awarded to James Frizelle's Automotive Group for $189,309.40 Contract LG314/411/17/005BF Q53/1 awarded to James Frizelle's Automotive Group for $236,908.00 A11019 Construction of Reedy Creek Landfill Cell 3 Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/045 awarded to Hazell Bros (Qld) Pty Ltd for $4,781,723.00 and Cell 3

A11020 Design and construction of bridge and road Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 9 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/207 awarded to GHD Pty Ltd for $24,970.00 works at teemangum street currumbin

A11090 Design and Construct for Elanora Cable Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 4 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/105 awarded to TEW for $640,133.10 Replacement Project

A11178 Strategic partnership for professional Invitation to Offer (ITO) for Significant Contract (iv)S 5 years (+1 x 5 years) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Contract LG314/621/19/204 Strategic Partnership for Professional Services awarded to Stantec & WSP Gold services be brought back to Council for consideration * Coast JV for $171,720.00 A11199 Regulated waste pumping services for City Operational Preferred Supplier Arrangement (iv) 4 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/054 awarded to Lee's Environmental for $1,436,654.00 various locations Plan

A11215 Replacement of the air-conditioning unit and Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 8 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/062 awarded to Dawson's Technical Services Pty Ltd for $122,020.20 exhaust fan rangehood at tipplers cafe, south stradbrok A11221 Wild city - connecting people with nature (our Our Natural City Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 7 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Meredith Elton Contract awarded by PO 3000313185 to Meredith Elton for $15,000 natural city strategy) Strategy goods or services being sought has no suitable alternatives available A11222 Udia 2019 industry leaders research (not-for- Sole source: (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation UDIA Queensland Contract awarded by PO 3000304549 to UDIA Queensland for $13,250 profit industry body representing the property Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training developm where alternatives do not practically exist A11223 Planning institute of australia (pia) gold Sole source: (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Planning Institute Of Contract awarded by PO 3000298438 to Planning Institute Of Aust. Ltd for $15,000 sponsorship congress 2019 Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Aust. Ltd where alternatives do not practically exist * A11224 Age friendly communities: photo voice project Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/121 awarded to Human Ventures Limited for $21,788.00

A11233 Supply and installation of weigh-in-motion GC City Quotation process (ii) 7 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/093 awarded to Excel Technology Co Pty Ltd for $47,980.00 system at stanmore road & ferny avenue Transport Strategy 2031 A11236 Supply and installation of fencing at gooding Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/125 awarded to Aaurora Fencing GC for $29,001.74 drive merrimac

A11253 Longer term panel arrangement for cabling Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/039 awarded to AFL Telecommunications Australia Pty Ltd for $300,000.00 Contract LG314/1185/19/039 awarded to Prysmian Australia Pty Ltd for $700,000.00

A11266 Minor civil works 18/19 Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (iii) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/158 awarded to NTS Group Pty Ltd for $42,040.00 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 242 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A11267 Register of pre-qualified suppliers for minor Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (iii) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Various contracts awarded see below miscellaneous works sewerage treatment

A11317 Cert iv government investigation consultancy Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/18/059 awarded to Peak Services Pty Ltd for $30,000.00

A11331 Master planning for molendinar waste Quotation process (ii) 5 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/175 awarded to SMEC Australia Pty Ltd for $152,500.00 precinct

A11332 Youth space rufous whistler park pimpama Quotation process (i) 16 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/052 awarded to Willplay Pty Ltd for $91,034.10 1) Estimated contract value changed to $65,000

A11334 Upgrade lifeguard facility at margaret avenue Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 6 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/077 awarded to Maintain Australia Pty Ltd for $62,130.00 broadbeach

A11335 Maintenance of council weighbridges Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/119 awarded to Complete Weighing Solutions Pty Ltd for $73,200.00 1) Estimated contract value changed to $105,000

A11337 Design, supply and install a cantilevered Quotation process (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/120 awarded to Vector Shade Structures Pty Ltd for $57,790.00 shade structure at coomera rivers state school A11339 Digital city mia software build poc Quotation process (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/055 awarded to Speedwell for $50,000.00

A11340 Design and documentation services for a Quotation process (i) 14 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/202 awarded to ME Architect for $71,609.00 public toilet building in ed hardy park

A11342 Design, supply and installation of ventilation Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/098 awarded to System Air Pty Ltd for $133,500.00 system at mal burke carpark

A11345 Abbott park fitness equipment construction Quotation process (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/116 awarded to Willplay Pty Ltd for $59,998.26

A11347 Replace decking on footbridge in river Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 10 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/097 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $104,908.47 reserve ashmore

A11348 Design of shared path honeyeater drive, Quotation process (i) 3 months 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/200 awarded to Complete Urban Solutions Pty Ltd for $33,300.00 burleigh waters

A11349 Design review – upgrade currumbin point Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 3 months 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/201 awarded to WSP Australia Pty Limited for $56,900.25 priority crossing & farmers family car park

A11350 Pimpama jacobs well road – preliminary Quotation process (i) 4 months 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/206 awarded to Burchills Engineering Solutions for $100,100.00 design four lane arterial road

A11351 Asset whs risk review - electrical & Quotation process (i) 3 months 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/209 awarded to AusSafe Consulting for $94,370.00 communication pits, conduits, poles & cables

A11352 Light rail stage 3a positive engagement Quotation process (i) 9 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/210 awarded to Right Angle Studio for $57,203.50 strategy

A11353 Replace bbq at lions park tallebudgera valley Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 8 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/095 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $37,794.74

A11354 Supply and install two lawn beams at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/100 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $24,037.88 southport cemetery

A11355 Park improvement at lions park jacobs well Quotation process (i) 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/094 awarded to Eco Technology Solutions Pty Ltd for $103,000.00

A11356 Relocate water service supply at pizzey park Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/102 awarded to Adams Commercial Plumbing and Gas Fitting for $47,357.00 miami

A11357 Supply and install decorative lighting in surf Quotation process (i) 8 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/064 awarded to Allrange Electrical Services Pty Ltd for $43,180.00 parade broadbeach

A11359 Pedestrian pathway lighting carrara depot Quotation process (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/122 awarded to Orca Solar Lighting Pty Ltd for $82,845.00

A11360 Coronet park improvement stage 1 Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 15 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/104 awarded to Maintain Australia Pty Ltd for $109,032.22

A11361 Master plan for the palm beach aquatic Quotation process (i) 4 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/215 awarded to Liquid Blu Pty. Ltd. for $87,450.00 centre redevelopment

A11362 Repair wall at helensvale library Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 3 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/096 awarded to Maintain Australia Pty Ltd for $30,863.00

A11363 Design, supply and install carport at namu Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 8 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/071 awarded to Kuipers Building for $21,273.65 merrimac

A11364 Replacement of sewer pipework at miami Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 11 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/105 awarded to Adams Commercial Plumbing and Gas Fitting for $53,950.00 pool, miami 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 243 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A11365 Design for flood - flood models and mapping Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/233 awarded to WMA Water Pty Ltd for $69,740.00 update

A11367 Emissions and amenity protection study Quotation process (i) 15 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/218 awarded to PSA Consulting for $45,355.00

A11374 Isovist planning - e-planning software for city Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 2 years Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to The unique or proprietary ISovist Australia Pty Ltd Contract LG314/1185/19/059 awarded to Isovist limited for $229,000.00 plan online and submissions goods or services being sought has no suitable nature of the goods or services being sought has no alternatives available suitable alternatives available 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation ISovist Australia Pty Ltd A11385 Griffith centre for coastal management Ocean Beaches Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Griffith University Contract LG314/621/19/237 awarded to GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY for $790,000 Strategy 2013- engagement is required to maintain the continuity of 23 expert advice, making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10857 Supply and delivery of mobile garbage bins Waste Strategy Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iii) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Contract Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Sulo MGB Australia Pty Contract LG314/1210/19/011 awarded to Sulo MGB Australia Pty Ltd for $5,924,183.81 2024 Completed Lt Q3

A2 - Contracts identified on the City Contracting Plan which went to market in the quarter (Q4) and will be completed in 2019-20

A10031 Transport and city planning consultants Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/092 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A10068 Supply ex-bin asphalt and bituminous Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/19/064 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 emulsions

A10086 Design, supply, install, repair and City Operational Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Contract LG314/690/19/018 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 maintenance of fixed roadside safety barriers Plan brought back to Council for consideration * A10336 Carrara indoor sports stadium main City Operational Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/20/003 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20. switchboard replacement Plan

A10354 Planning consultancy for gold coast central City Operational Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/042 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 park Plan

A10411 Supply of barge services with equipment, Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+3 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Contract LG314/690/19/060 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 labour, aggregate/rock, sand, soil and turf brought back to Council for consideration * A10432 Ground maintenance services Invitation to Offer (ITO) for Significant Contract (iv)S 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Contract LG314/690/19/04 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 be brought back to Council for consideration * A10473 Miami aquatic centre redevelopment Invitation to Offer (ITO) for Significant Contract (iv)S 2 years Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Contract LG314/1211/20/004 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 be brought back to Council for consideration * A10508 Upgrade road and install a new wheel wash Solid Waste Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/126 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 at stapylton landfill main access area Strategy 2024

A10516 Design and construct co13 coomera marine Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 6 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/20/005 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 precinct vacuum pump station upgrade

A10571 Removal and beneficial reuse of biosolids Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 2 year (+3 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Contract LG314/411/19/040 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 brought back to Council for consideration * A10588 Design and upgrade to pimpama sewer Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv)S 15 months Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Contract LG314/1211/20/001 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 treatment plant stage 2 works - pimpama brought back to Council for consideration catchment area * A10590 Install new mains and pump station for the Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/102 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 sandy creek industrial precinct - stapylton catchment A10657 Supply of mission critical services for hp and Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (iii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Hewlett-Packard Contract LG314/1185/19/058 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 compaq servers maintenance to existing systems making it Australia Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10703 Provision of support and maintenance for City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (iii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Ent.Services Australia Contract LG314/1185/19/056 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 grange software Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10705 Provision of maintenance and support of the Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Frontier Software Pty Contract LG314/1185/13/054 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 chris21 payroll/hr system maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10719 Provision of an Electronic Document and City Operational Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (iv)S 12 years (+5 x 1 year) Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Objective Corporation Contract LG314/1185/19/022 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 Records Management System (eDRMS) Plan available reasonably available Limited 1) Contract type changed to (iv) 2. Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be 2) Contract duration changed to 13 years (+5 x 1 year) brought back to Council for consideration * *

A10720 Managed service/cloud migration Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/041 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 1) Contract type changed to (iv) 2) Estimated contract value changed to $1,775,000 3) Contract duration changed to 2 years 3 months (+1 x 1 year) 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 244 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10730 Treasury management system Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/012 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A10763 Security services including canine Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 2 years (+3 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Contract LG314/411/19/013 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 be brought back to Council for consideration * A10860 Construction of northern gold coast sports Invitation to Offer (ITO) for Significant Contract (iv)S 26 months Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Contract LG314/1211/20/002 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 and community precinct brought back to Council for consideration * A10983 Servicenow professional services Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/070 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A10991 City of gold coast aquatic centres - coaching Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 2 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Contract LG314/411/19/052 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 rights agreement brought back to Council for consideration * A11002 Coastal imaging and reporting for the Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/127 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 monitoring of littoral areas

A11011 Servicenow licencing, support and Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation ServiceNow Australia Contract LG314/1185/19/060 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 maintenance goods or services being sought has no suitable Pty Ltd alternatives available * A11015 Smart water meter project - expansion phase Invitation to Offer, Innovative Procurement (iii) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/029 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 opportunity

A11017 Design and construction of the gold coast Expression of Interest (EOI) and Invitation to Offer (iii) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/059 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 dive attraction stage 1 (ITO)

A11026 Construction of isle of capri bridge Invitation to Offer (ITO) for Significant Contract (iv)S 2 years 6 months Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Contract LG314/1211/18/120 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 brought back to Council for consideration * A11171 Whole of council cleaning internal buildings Invitation to Offer, Innovative Procurement (iv) 3 years (+3 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Contract LG314/690/17/003 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 opportunity brought back to Council for consideration * A11176 Asbestos bin hire, collection and removal Quotation process (i) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/20/010 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 services from water and waste bundall treatment plant A11180 Detailed design of the broadwater parklands Expression of Interest (EOI) and Invitation to Offer (i) 3 months 3 weeks 5 Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/18/196 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 play attraction (ITO) days

A11226 Provision of bulk petroleum Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/18/062 out to market, to be awarded 2109-20

A11238 Sewer inspection, location, jetrodding and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/061 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 patch repair

A11239 Stormwater network condition assessment Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/069 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 and maintenance program * A11254 Microsoft ea. 2019 Single Source from a government/LGAQ (iv)S 3 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract INSIGHT ENTERPRISES Contract LG314/1185/19/040 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 arrangement be brought back to Council for consideration * * AUSTRALIA PTY LTD A11262 Provision of record keeping services Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/20/002 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 * A11263 Management of city of gold coast tourist City Operational Invitation to Offer (ITO) for Significant Contract (iv)S 5 years (+1 x 5 years) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Contract LG314/411/19/065 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 parks Plan be brought back to Council for consideration * A11265 General electrical energex maintenance Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/004 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 servicing and repairs

A11320 Sewer maintenance hole refurbishment fy Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (iii) 1 year 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/765/15/003 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 2018-19

A11323 Audio video system maintenance and support Quotation process (i) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/19/050 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 services at the council chambers

A11326 Coastal infrastructure resilience and capacity Quotation process (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/182 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 planning

A11344 City flows monitoring pilot program Quotation process (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/134 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

B - Contracts identified on the City Contracting Plan to be completed in Q4 which were removed from the Plan

A10009 Technical support local government Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Pie Solutions Pty Ltd Remove from plan infrastructure plan - pie solutions pty ltd engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Pie Solutions Pty Ltd * 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 245 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10010 Licensing and maintenance of software by Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Technology One Ltd Remove from plan technology one limited maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10016 Peer review - city plan major update 5 Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10018 Heritage architect consultancy Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10020 Flora and fauna database improvements Our Natural City Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Strategy

A10022 Conversion into network infrastructure Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan demand model (idm)

A10023 Position paper on integration with city plan Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10026 Assessment of lgip trunk projects synergies & Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan coordination

A10029 LGIP costing tool Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10032 Tidal measurement at the mouth of Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan tallebudgera creek

A10042 Provision of support, maintenance, licensing Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation 12d Solutions Pty ltd Remove from plan and services for the 12d stormwater maintenance to existing systems making it modelling software disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10044 Software upgrade, annual licence fee and Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan support cost for pd online

A10046 Continuity of the council endorsed Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation ARM Architecture Remove from plan masterplan for the gold coast cultural system/equipment/proprietary item/brand precinct * A10048 In-house id construction to install security Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan infrastructure

A10050 Provision of service and maintenance to Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (ii) 5 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Designa Australia Pty Remove from plan designa sabar hardware and software at the system/equipment/proprietary item/brand brought back to Council for consideration Ltd bruce bishop car * * A10051 Provision of esri professional interfaced Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation ESRI Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan solutions maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10052 Works associated with gas pipelines - allgas Sole source: Statement of licence, legislated (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Allgas Energy Pty Ltd Remove from plan requirements, third party ownership of assets or industry regulated standards making it impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10055 Supply gas to various city locations for Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is BOC Ltd Remove from plan oxygen cylinders available reasonably available 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to BOC Limited

A10063 Relocation alternation of telstra infrastructure Sole source: Statement of licence, legislated (i) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Telstra Corporation Remove from plan for footpath works requirements, third party ownership of assets or Limited industry regulated standards making it impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10071 Licensing and maintenance of software by City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Global Integrated Remove from plan global integrated solutions limited Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Solutions Limited disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10073 Licensing and maintenance of software by City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Challenge for Change Remove from plan challenge for change Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Limited disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10076 Licensing and maintenance of software City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Legion Limited Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10077 Uecomm network and services agreement City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Uecomm Operations Pty Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10078 Production of the city's 'walk and cycle maps" GC City Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Z Card Pocket Media Remove from plan Transport goods or services being sought has no suitable Solutions Z Asia Pty Ltd Strategy 2031 alternatives available * A10083 Supply installation and commissioning of GC City Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan traffic signals Transport Strategy 2031 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 246 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10084 Manufacture precast concrete structures for City Operational Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature C-M Concrete Products Remove from plan refuge islands Plan are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous Precast Civil Industries to undertake a competitive process or impractical to undertake a competitive process Pty Ltd 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to C-M Concrete Products Pty Ltd

A10089 Ocean planning no.1 GC City Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Transport Strategy 2031 A10094 Road safety consultancies GC City Quotation process (i) 6 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Transport Strategy 2031 A10103 Intelligent transport systems - trial of GC City Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan pedestrian management technologies Transport Strategy 2031 A10106 In-pavement vehicle detection technology GC City Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan enhancement program Transport Strategy 2031 A10109 Design and installation services for intelligent GC City Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan systems infrastructure Transport Strategy 2031 A10113 Culvert renewal repair causeway culvert Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan kerkin road pimpama

A10121 Bridge refurbishment salerno street surfers Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan paradise

A10146 GC Highway & Chevron Access - Intelligent GC City Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Transport Systems (ITS) cabinet renewal Transport Strategy 2031 A10147 Supply of composite fibre technologies Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Wagners CFT Remove from plan system/equipment/proprietary item/brand * Manufacturing Pty Ltd A10148 Barge service for south stradbroke island Quotation process (i) 1 year (+3 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10162 Eszs refurbishment project 2g to 4g Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10163 Upgrade wig wag flooded road signage Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10174 Bundall road at rowing club - intelligent GC City Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan transport systems (its) cabinet renewal Transport Strategy 2031 A10189 Provision of a tool to record engagements for Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a MySite Design Pty Ltd Remove from plan community impacts engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to MySite Design Pty Ltd t/as Consultation Manager

A10193 Provision, maintenance, support and training Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation I D Consulting Pty Ltd Remove from plan for online community and economic profiling maintenance to existing systems making it and mapping disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10194 Purchase of minor equipment for pest Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan management unit

A10195 Solar powered relocatable cctv cameras Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10196 Upgrade cctv safety camera network at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan southport

A10197 Upgrade cctv safety camera network at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan surfers paradise

A10198 Upgrade cctv safety camera network at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan coolangatta

A10199 Upgrade cctv safety camera network at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan broadbeach

A10200 Coordinate the delivery of infrastructure Ocean Beaches Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan enhancements to create accessible Strategy 2013- destinations 23 A10202 Supplier of medical treatment services Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Sonic Health Plus Pty Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Ltd expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Sonic Health Plus Pty Ltd 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 247 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10216 Provision of editorial and distribution services Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 9 months Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Australian Associated Remove from plan for gc2018 available reasonably available Press Pty Ltd 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Australian Associated Press Pty Ltd * A10224 Provide a specialist and tailored web based Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Aconex Remove from plan project management tool for large scale infrastructure p * A10227 Specialist advisory services for the delivery Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature Jones Lang Lasalle Remove from plan of the gold coast cultural precinct are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous (QLD) Pty Limited to undertake a competitive process or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Jones Lang Lasalle Advisory

A10230 Access to the pharos system used in branch Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation EEMS Technologies Pty Remove from plan libraries maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd ATF Fairclough disadvantageous or impractical to invite Family Trust quotes/tenders * A10232 Macquarie dictionary publishers - provides Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Macquarie Dictionary Remove from plan access to information resources for council Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Publishers an imprint of officers. where alternatives do not practically exist * Pan Macmillan Australia Pty Ltd A10234 Provision of ezproxy software and Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation OCLC (UK) Ltd Remove from plan maintenance maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10240 Provision of optelec products Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Quantum Reading Remove from plan maintenance to existing systems making it Learning Vision disadvantageous or impractical to invite Quantum Technology quotes/tenders * Pty Ltd A10244 Provision of the library management system Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Innovative Interfaces Remove from plan (sierra), maintenance and training services maintenance to existing systems making it Global Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10255 Provision of equipment for usage at the bruce Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (ii) 5 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Advam Pty Ltd Remove from plan bishop car park - advam's hardware and system/equipment/proprietary item/brand brought back to Council for consideration software * * A10256 Truck washing facilities for pest management Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature Remove from plan vehicles of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Metro Coach Pty Ltd as Trustees for Coachtrans Unit Trust No. 2 t/a Coachtrans Australia

A10257 Services of climbing trees and installing Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Broadleaf Habi-Tec Pty Remove from plan habitat hollows for biodiversity and sensitive engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Ltd veteran expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Habi-Tec

A10259 Gold coast sports precinct turf and resoil City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Plan

A10262 Supply and delivery of lifeguard board shorts Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10263 Licences-booking software for the Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation RMS (Aust) Pty Ltd Remove from plan management of accommodation hire across maintenance to existing systems making it tourist parks disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10264 Licences-booking software for the Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation RMS (Aust) Pty Ltd Remove from plan management of venue hire across community maintenance to existing systems making it centres and major sports disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10273 Supply and maintenance of swimming pool Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a QIS Energy Remove from plan blankets engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Conservation Systems expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous Pty Ltd impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to QIS * Energy Conservation Systems Pty Ltd

A10276 Business management software for sporting, Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Links Modular Solutions Remove from plan aquatic and community facilities maintenance to existing systems making it Links Modular Solutions disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10277 Maintenance and service at five aquatic Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Remove from plan centres (including equipment, hwc previous/current engagement is required to maintain the replacement, chemical dosi continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Pacific Water Treatment Services

A10285 Supply and delivery of catering goods Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (i) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 248 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10287 Business planning - major sports venues and Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Dean Hassall Consulting Remove from plan aquatic centres engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Pty Ltd expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Dean * Hassall Consulting

A10289 Carrara outdoor playing fields renovation Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10290 Runaway bay indoor stadium equipment Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan renewal

A10292 Supply and install 3 "safari tents" broadwater Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan tp

A10296 Cemeteries redevelopment and expansion Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan planner

A10300 Catering providers Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10302 Parks and leisure - professional association Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Parks & Leisure Remove from plan for the parks and leisure sector. Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Australia where alternatives do not practically exist * A10304 Manufacture and supply of park naming signs Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature Signart Creations Pty Remove from plan are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous Ltd to undertake a competitive process or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Signart Creations

A10307 Permit to operate markets on council Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan controlled land

A10311 Supply of cctv to botanic gardens City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Plan

A10317 Provision of self-checkouts upgrade and new Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Bibliotheca Pty Ltd Remove from plan gold service agreement for branch libraries system/equipment/proprietary item/brand * A10318 Provider for the centaman system for the Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Centaman Systems Pty Remove from plan right of use program within parks and maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd recreational services disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10323 Supply and installation of park naming signs Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Signart Creations Pty Remove from plan goods or services being sought has no suitable Ltd alternatives available A10325 Establishment of a day use area and kayak Our Natural City Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan friendly launch point alongside existing boat Strategy ramp which A10328 Renewal of fire trails within the natural area Our Natural City Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (ii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan estate for lower beechmont conservation Strategy area, austinv A10330 Deliver a scoping study and pilot project for Culture Strategy Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan an indigenous oral history program 2023

A10332 Council administered venues equipment Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan including audio visual, security systems, projectors, digital A10337 Carrara indoor sports stadium kiosk City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan equipment Plan

A10339 Helensvale aquatic centre timber sheds City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Plan

A10340 Palm beach aquatic centre squash lighting City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Plan

A10341 Palm beach aquatic centre squash court City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan refurbishments Plan

A10342 Runaway bay indoor sports p.a. upgrade City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Plan

A10343 Coomera indoor sports centre portable City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan indoor grandstands Plan

A10344 Coomera indoor sports centre carpark City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan lighting Plan

A10345 Various major sporting venues and aquatic City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan centre slip testing rectifications Plan 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 249 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10346 Palm beach aquatic centre learn to swim City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan hydrotherapy pool heat pumps Plan

A10351 Construction of toilet at riverstone crossing City Operational Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 6 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan park Plan

A10358 Parks path structures renewals - 4 locations City Operational Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Plan

A10367 Improve the access and the capacity of Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan existing city sports fields and parks - tourmaline reserve / A10371 Deliver led lighting Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10374 Albert waterways community centre Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan extension - design consultancy

A10376 Renewal works - luke harrop cycle track, Quotation process (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan replacement grandstand roof at runaway bay rugby, roof A10380 Norfolk park - design and construction of Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan sports field lighting

A10383 Nerang administration building renewal Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan program

A10384 Amp - conditional assessment, asset Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan inspection and service life data

A10385 Amp - conditional assessment, asset Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan inspection and service life data for community, cultural and you A10389 Refurbishment of public amenities - at len fox Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan park, labrador, cheltenham park, ashmore community A10391 Plumbing infrastructure replacement program Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan for victoria park, federation park and surfers paradise A10399 Gcac building repaint Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10404 Southport - renewal program Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10409 Robina - renewal program Quotation process (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10410 Runaway bay renewal program - eves Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan replacement and external building works

A10412 Pump mechanical and electrical maintenance Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan and repairs and servicing

A10414 Commercial catering appliance and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan equipment programmed maintenance and repairs A10415 Equipotential bonding inspection Quotation process (i) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan maintenance and servicing

A10418 Installation maintenance and repairs of Quotation process (i) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan chilled and boiling water units

A10419 Glazing services Quotation process (i) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/116 awarded to ASAP Glass Pty Ltd for $176,367

A10420 Thermo scanning of switchboard servicing Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan repairs and maintenance

A10423 Supply and delivery of building materials Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10425 Supply of nuts, bolts and ancillary items Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10438 Design, supply, installation, removals and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan maintenance of shade structures and ancillary materials r * A10443 Security upgrade and improvements Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10444 Survey services City Operational Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Remove from plan Plan brought back to Council for consideration * 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 250 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10445 Cee systems support and maintenance City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation CEE Hydrosystems Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10453 Repaint arts centre Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10455 Arts centre fencing Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10460 Supply and installation of sheet piling Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10461 Tree transplanting - mountain view ave Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10470 Supply and delivery of emulsion products Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10476 Hydromulching and eco blanket for various Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan construction projects

A10477 Steel reinforcement supply for various Quotation process (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan construction projects

A10479 Fabrication, supply and install of bicycle safe Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan friendly fencing for various construction projects A10481 Underground service locations Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years (+3 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Remove from plan brought back to Council for consideration

A10482 Provision of software support, upgrades and Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Newcastle Weighing Remove from plan modifications to weighbridge operating maintenance to existing systems making it Services Pty Ltd system disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10489 Collection, transportation, processing and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv)S 5 years (+5 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Remove from plan recycling of various waste streams brought back to Council for consideration * A10501 Landfill capping and rehabilitation - Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 3 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan molendinar landfill

A10502 Construction of a new site office at reedy Quotation process (i) 3 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan creek landfill

A10503 Wrc weighbridge and security upgrade - Quotation process (i) 6 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan investigate technology solutions to improve access to wrcs A10511 Professional services for access Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan management assessment and enhancement: cow scada A10518 Sewage treatment plant scada upgrade 2018- Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 2 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Process Safety and Remove from plan 2020 maintenance to existing systems making it Automation Engineering disadvantageous or impractical to invite Pty Ltd quotes/tenders A10521 Licences, maintenance, helpdesk services for Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Innovyze Pty Ltd Remove from plan h2o map water and h2o map swim network maintenance to existing systems making it modelling softwa disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10522 Real time analysis and modelling for scada Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation OSIsoft Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan system - osisof llc maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10529 Repair and maintenance of council’s existing Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Flowtech Water Meters Remove from plan fleet of approximately 500 flowtech metered system/equipment/proprietary item/brand Global Connections standpipes Group Pty Ltd A10530 Specialised microbiology laboratory Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Idexx Laboratories Pty Remove from plan equipment for the detection of coliforms, engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Ltd e.coli and other bacte expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Idexx * Laboratories Pty Ltd

A10532 Testing authority for water samples that are Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Proficiency Testing Remove from plan used in the laboratory certification process available reasonably available Australia 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Proficiency Testing Australia * A10535 Consumables for specialised analytical Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature BTF Pty Ltd Remove from plan testing for parasites for identification and are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous enumeration of c to undertake a competitive process or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to BTF Pty Ltd *

A10539 Supply and servicing of flow monitoring Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Environmental Data Remove from plan equipment. manufacturers of monitoring system/equipment/proprietary item/brand Services Dumford Pty instrumentation in wa Ltd ATF 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 251 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10540 To provide iseki vacuum valves and vacuum Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation H.I. Fraser Pty Ltd Remove from plan valve controller kits that are compatible with goods or services being sought has no suitable existing in alternatives available * A10544 Provision of supply and maintenance of Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Rotork Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan actuators in reticulation systems and sewage available reasonably available treatment plants 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Rotork Australia Pty Ltd * A10546 Supply of screenings and dewatering Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Spirac Pty Ltd Remove from plan equipment spare parts and service available reasonably available 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Spirac Pty Ltd * A10547 Provide specialised training delivering water Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Water Industry Remove from plan quality awareness and distribution systems available reasonably available Operators Association management 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Water of Australia Ltd Industry Operators Association of Australia * A10549 Monitoring instrumentation in water and Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Environmental Data Remove from plan wastewater reticulation system and treatment available reasonably available Services Dumford Pty plants 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to The Ltd ATF Trustee for the Elite Family Trust t/a Environmental Data Services (EDS)

A10553 Provision of biowin software licence - Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation EnviroSim Associates Remove from plan simulation software solutions and consulting maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd services for was disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10554 Nextgen networks pty ltd - maintenance of Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Next Gen Fibre & Data Remove from plan communication infrastructure and network goods or services being sought has no suitable Networks NGT Holdings systems alternatives available * Pty Ltd ATF A10555 Service of specialised technical equipment Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Qld Traceable Remove from plan utilised by water and waste available reasonably available Calibrations Pty Ltd 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Qld Traceable Calibrations * A10563 Supply vacuum valve for the sewer systems Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Flovac Vacuum Remove from plan located on the gold coast system/equipment/proprietary item/brand Sewerage Systems Pty * Ltd A10564 Supply and maintenance of specialised gas Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Alpha Biogas Pty Ltd Remove from plan fired varec brand equipment for sewage system/equipment/proprietary item/brand treatment plans wit * A10565 Manufacturer of vacuum pumps and systems Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Busch Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan used at vacuum pump stations available reasonably available 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Busch Australia Pty Ltd * A10572 Manufacturers of specialist cables in Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Bambach Wires & Remove from plan reticulation system and water and sewage available reasonably available Cables Pty Ltd treatment plants 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Bambach Wires and Cables Pty Limited * A10576 Product monitoring - scientific services Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Perkinelmer Pty Ltd Remove from plan goods or services being sought has no suitable alternatives available * A10579 Replacement of inlet control valves to Quotation process (i) 6 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan reservoirs

A10584 Refurbishment of elanora and merrimac stp Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan process tanks

A10585 Replacements of anodes to cathodic Quotation process (ii) 3 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan protection systems to protect potable water mild steel water main A10587 Deliver infrastructure works required for the Invitation to Offer (ITO) for Significant Contract (iv)S 3 Years Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant contract Remove from plan expansion of the recycled water network be brought back to Council for consideration * A10592 Replace existing corroded vacuum vessels Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 9 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan (vacuum pump station upgrade)

A10595 Stapylton sewerage catchment augment Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 18 months Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Remove from plan be brought back to Council for consideration

A10596 Installation of water meter connections Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10598 Assessment and report on the status of Quotation process (i) 4 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan cathodic protection (cp) on mild steel sewer and non-drinking A10599 Assessment and report on the status of Quotation process (i) 4 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan cathodic protection (cp) on mild steel water mains A10600 Condition assess - sewer rising main Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 252 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10608 Infrastructure valuations for the city's building Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature Australis Advisory Remove from plan portfolio are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous Group Pty Ltd to undertake a competitive process or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Australis Group Pty Ltd *

A10610 Remotely piloted aircraft services / drones Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10612 Visitor sentiment analysis - Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Aginic Remove from plan design/consultancy services maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10614 Robotic process automation Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Data Interactive Pty Ltd Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Data Interactive Pty Ltd

A10615 Digital platform - panel of platform delivery Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Remove from plan providers (aws, apps dev, analytics) brought back to Council for consideration * A10616 Digital platform - ongoing support agreement Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Universal Remove from plan Communications Group * Ltd A10617 Digital platform – business intelligence Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Communications Group Remove from plan licence purchases maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10618 Bin monitoring pilot expansion Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (iv) 3 years (+2 x 2 years) Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Solar Bins Australia Pty Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Ltd expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Recommendation to enter into the arrangement with * * Solar Bins Australia Pty Ltd be brought back to Council for consideration A10619 Bbq monitoring expansion Quotation process (i) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10625 Business engagement operations (customer Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan registration capability)

A10629 Online timesheets - award interpreter Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10631 Cloud-base enterprise portfolio, program, Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Sensei Productivity Pty Remove from plan and project management (p3m) system maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10633 Corporate membership - local government Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Local Buy Pty Ltd Remove from plan association of queensland Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training where alternatives do not practically exist * A10634 Provision of actuarial services for gold coast Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (ii) 5 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Francis Funder Remove from plan city council’s queensland workers system/equipment/proprietary item/brand compensation liabil * * A10638 Subscription - professional online surveys Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation SurveyMonkey Europe Remove from plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10639 Licencing and technical support for the city's Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Bang the Table Pty Ltd Remove from plan software 'gchaveyoursay.com.au' maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10645 Annual ICT license and support - lawmaster Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Law Master Pty Ltd Remove from plan case management system maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10648 ICT solution to host information on the use, Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Chemwatch Ucorp Pty Remove from plan management and storage of hazardous maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd chemicals disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10652 Access to specialist electronic resources for Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Anstat Pty Ltd Remove from plan council officers through the corporate library Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training where alternatives do not practically exist * A10660 Hp quality centre maintenance and support Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation JDS Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10663 Replacement workplace health and safety Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan system

A10664 Optus services Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Optus Billing Services Remove from plan maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 253 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10666 Outback Imaging Pty Ltd (EzeScan) Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Outback Imaging Pty Ltd Remove from plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10675 Cisco support agreement and smartnet Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Dimension Data Aust Pty Remove from plan maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10677 Provision of identification card readers for Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Practical Peripherals Remove from plan city of gold coast libraries maintenance to existing systems making it Corp Pty Ltd ATF The disadvantageous or impractical to invite Peripherals quotes/tenders * A10679 Lexisnexis compliance modules Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10680 Centralised booking solution - reservation Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan management system upgrade

A10681 Open windows contracts implementation and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan support services

A10683 Enhance existing antivirus tools and Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan techniques

A10684 Implement security controls across city's Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan existing cloud applications

A10685 Professional services for network Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan assessment and security enhancement

A10687 Professional services for access Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan management assessment and enhancement for scn/pw A10688 Cyber security testing services Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10695 Cisco support and maintenance (unified Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan communications)

A10697 Licensing software by citec Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Citec Remove from plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10699 DCC ICT redundancy Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10702 Smartnet support agreement City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Dimension Data Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10709 Provision of design and asset management Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation A2K Technologies Pty Remove from plan software maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10711 Links modular software license and Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Links Modular Solutions Remove from plan maintenance Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Pty Ltd where alternatives do not practically exist * A10716 Information communication technology Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan cabling requirements within council's assets

A10724 Wan strategy implementation Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10734 Provision of online automotive information Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Glass's Information Remove from plan available previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Services Pty Ltd continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Glass's * Information Services

A10739 Disposal of vehicles, plant and equipment Disposal of non-current assets (i)D 1 Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan Q4

A10744 Tracking gate and fuel prices Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 Year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Fueltrac Pty Ltd Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Fueltrac * Pty Ltd

A10745 Truck wash down bay maintenance and Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan testing

A10746 Maintenance of depot truck wash facilities Quotation process (i) 1 Year (+2 x 1 Year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 254 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10751 Supply, repair and maintain keywatcher Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Keywatch Systems Remove from plan system including consumables, key tags etc. system/equipment/proprietary item/brand Queensland Neaves Investment Group Pty Ltd A10752 Locking mechanisms and locksmith services Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10754 Air quality testing Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10755 Asbestos management systems Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10756 Purchase of fire extinguishers and Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan emergency exit lights

A10758 Office furniture provision and delivery Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10759 Corporate Uniform - internal staff Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10761 Supply and installation of office furniture at Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan waterside buildings

A10764 Support, maintenance and licensing for the Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Acresta Remove from plan mobile dispatch system for regulatory maintenance to existing systems making it activities disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10765 Miami depot office redesign Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10767 Provision of interactive voice response (ivr) Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Talkingtech (Aust) Pty Remove from plan solution (outbound calls for debt recovery) maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10772 Corporate membership: healthy waterways Sole source: (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Healthy Waterways Ltd Remove from plan pty ltd (specialist consultancy services of Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training waterway health where alternatives do not practically exist * A10777 Provide software programs for hydrologic and Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation DHI Water and Remove from plan hydraulic modelling maintenance to existing systems making it Environment Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10778 Bruttour international pty ltd is the australian Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation CEE Hydrosystems Remove from plan agent for cee hydrosystems hydrographic maintenance to existing systems making it surveying e disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10779 Provision of leica survey equipment Sole source: Statement of licence, legislated (i) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation C R Kennedy & Co Pty Remove from plan maintenance and replacement on leica total requirements, third party ownership of assets or Ltd stations gps equipmen industry regulated standards making it impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10780 Renovation/refurbishment at nerang Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (ii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan administration centre

A10781 Building services and asbestos removal - Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan tugun depot

A10782 Waterside basement structural repair Quotation process (ii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10783 Miami depot maintenance shed upgrade Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10785 Carrara depot washbay upgrade Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10786 Bin storage installation - waterside precinct Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10789 Waterside west ground floor - building Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan construction services

A10791 Bathroom refurbishment southport chambers Quotation process (ii) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10793 Council chambers carpet laying and repair Quotation process (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan works

A10800 Provision of a customer contact telephony City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Datacom Systems Pty Remove from plan services platform Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10801 Peoplestreme - human capital information City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Peoplestreme Remove from plan management system Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 255 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10802 Cyber resiliance program - akamai services City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Optus Billing Services Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10803 Provision of intelligent business research City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (ii) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Intelligent Business Remove from plan services Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Research Services Pty disadvantageous or impractical to invite Ltd quotes/tenders * A10805 Points north community titles scheme 4774 - City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (ii) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Points North CTS 4774 Remove from plan installation of communications equipment Plan maintenance to existing systems making it c/- Body Corporate and cctv camera disadvantageous or impractical to invite Services Pty Ltd quotes/tenders * A10807 Online community consultation database City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Bang the Table Pty Ltd Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10810 Fme safe software City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Navigate Pty Ltd Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10818 Provision of support and maintenance for City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Novera Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan resource scheduler software and program Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10819 Sophos puremessage exchange City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Telstra Corporation Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Limited disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10820 Darzin software City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Darzin Software Allison Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Hendricks Consulting disadvantageous or impractical to invite P/L quotes/tenders * A10825 Arcgis portal - pathway integration City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Isovist Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10826 Powercontrols for exchange City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Data # 3 Limited Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10830 Sidra intersection enterprise City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Sidra Solutions Akcelik Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it & Associates Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10836 Microsoft dynamics crm online City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Microsoft Pty Ltd Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10837 Ausspec complete City Operational Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 Year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Construction Remove from plan Plan maintenance to existing systems making it Information Systems Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10840 Lease of cafe space at broadbeach library Single source: It is in the public interest to single (i) 3 years Q4 1. Council is satisfied that it is in the public interest to Endeavour Foundation Remove from plan source single source to Endeavour Foundation as a social procurement initiative 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation

A10841 Lease of cafe space at southport library Single source: It is in the public interest to single (i) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 1.It is in the public interest to conduct a closed invitation Remove from plan source process limited to organisations that provide social opportunities. 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation

A10842 Lease of cafe space at robina community Quotation process (i) 2 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 1.It is in the public interest to conduct a closed invitation Remove from plan centre process limited to organisations that provide social opportunities. 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation

A10844 Specialist bridge superintendency Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (iii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation GHD Pty Ltd Remove from plan representatives engagement is required to maintain the continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders A10845 Digital city sea cable: design/consultancy Expression of Interest (EOI) and Invitation to Offer (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan services (ITO)

A10846 Provision of uniforms for city personnel - city Quotation process (i) 10 Weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan events

A10847 Manufacture, supply and delivery of street Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan and park furniture

A10853 Horticultural renovation of sports fields and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement be Remove from plan parks brought back to Council for consideration * A10865 Patric review (pathosystems resource Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan integration centre)

A10868 Partnership program: partnerships with In accordance with Council approved criteria and (i) Various Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan business and industry groups guidelines

A10869 Investment attraction: business and industry In accordance with Council approved criteria and (i) Various Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan attraction program guidelines 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 256 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10870 Export assistance scheme: funding In accordance with Council approved criteria and (i) Various Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan assistance for exporters guidelines

A10871 Façade improvement program: funding In accordance with Council approved criteria and (i) Various Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan assistance for façade program (cbd program) guidelines

A10872 Knowledge management improvement Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (i) 3 years Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature Promapp Solutions Remove from plan program are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous Limited to undertake a competitive process or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Promapp Pty Ltd *

A10873 Bio-resource management strategy - market Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan analysis

A10877 Provision of a pre qualified contractor Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 3 Years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan solution

A10878 Waste facilities environmental audits Quotation process (i) 4 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10881 Upper coomera aquatic centre - renewals Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10882 Construct leachate receival facility Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 9 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10892 Noise testing mike hatcher raceway Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (i) 3 years 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Acoustic Works Pty Ltd Remove from plan system/equipment/proprietary item/brand * A10899 Supply of marc records Sole source: (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation OCLC (UK) Ltd Remove from plan Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training where alternatives do not practically exist * A10901 Body language and behavioural interviewing Single source: Only one supplier is reasonably (i) 1 day Q4 1. Council is satisfied that only one supplier is Australian Polygraph Remove from plan available reasonably available Services 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Australian Polygraph Services * A10922 Residential design review of city plan Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 3 months Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Urbis Pty Ltd Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Urbis Pty Ltd

A10927 Baratta street landfill Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 2 years Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Lambert & Rehbein Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the (SEQ Pty Ltd) expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Lambert * & Rehbein (SEQ Pty Ltd)

A10930 Threat monitoring and detection and Quotation process (i) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan vulnerability management - phase two

A10941 Community transport services (shuttle) Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10952 Provides access to various digital content Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (i) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation EBSCO Australia Remove from plan * A10955 Vector control information system (mosquito Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Frontier Precision Remove from plan control) goods or services being sought has no suitable alternatives available * A10957 Supply of swimming accessories to aquatic Quotation process (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan centres

A10969 Support services for library equipment Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Bibliotheca Australia Pty Remove from plan maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders * A10978 Specialised cyber security firm to provide Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 3 years (+2 x 2 years) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan security testing services

A10984 Cloud billing automation Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 7 months 2 weeks (+2 Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan x 1 year)

A10987 Identity and access management Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A10990 Service improvement plan phase 2 Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 257 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A10994 Mobility roadmap and design/implementation Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year 4 months (+2 x Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan 1 year)

A10997 Decommission/archival services Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year 4 months (+2 x Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan 1 year)

A11003 Secure collection and delivery of cash Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11004 Information communication and technology Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 3 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Remove from plan cabling requirements in councils assets brought back to Council for consideration * A11005 Supply and maintenance: trucks >8t Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11006 Sap work manager ongoing licensing, Sole source: Goods/services matches the existing (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation SAP Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan support and licensing system/equipment/proprietary item/brand * A11009 Construction of coombabah sewerage Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan treatment plant cogeneration plant

A11010 Metal fabrication and supply of metal Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan products

A11012 Test services Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year 4 months (+2 x Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan 1 year)

A11018 Waste recycling facility (mrf) Solid Waste Expression of Interest (EOI) and Invitation to Offer (iv) 10 years (+5 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Remove from plan Strategy 2024, (ITO) brought back to Council for consideration Gold Coast 2022, City Operational * Plan A11085 Planning and urban growth model Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Sizztech Pty Ltd Remove from plan goods or services being sought has no suitable previous/current engagement is required to maintain the alternatives available continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Sizztech

A11087 Hydrodynamic modelling for the long term Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied that due to the specialised nature DHI Water and Remove from plan recycled water release plan stage 2 are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical of the service that are sought, makes it disadvantageous Environment Pty Ltd to undertake a competitive process or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to DHI Water & Environment *

A11089 Design and construction of pressure mains Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 2 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Remove from plan brought back to Council for consideration * A11179 Register of prequalified suppliers for design Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv)S 2 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the Significant Contract Remove from plan supply and installation of energy renewable be brought back to Council for consideration and storage * A11181 Tyres tubes and repairs Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11182 Collection of monies related to aquatic Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan centres

A11183 Construction of the gold coast's premier play Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan attraction

A11190 Cost-benefit options analysis for surface Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 6 weeks Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a SMEC Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan drain renewal engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to SMEC Australia Pty Ltd

A11197 Ferry services (trial) Expression of Interest (EOI) and Invitation to Offer (ii) 2 years (+2 x 5 years) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan (ITO)

A11204 Supply, delivery, repairs, maintenance and Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan upgrades of cranes, hoists, and lifting equipment A11205 Towing of heavy council owned trucks Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11212 Infrastructure investment initiative Quotation process (i) 6 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11220 Prioritisation of koala conservation actions Our Natural City Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan using conservation modelling systems Strategy 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 258 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A11235 Detailed design and technical services for Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 69 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan network optimisation of sewerage sub- catchment helensvale A11241 Occupational hygiene services Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 3 Years Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a WSP Australia Pty Ltd Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to WSP Pty Ltd

A11242 Procure unit rate upgrade Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Benchmark Pty Ltd Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Benchmark Pty Ltd

A11243 Procure planning tool refinements Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11244 Procure planning parameter advice Quotation process (ii) 2 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11245 Procure network planning - logan catchment Quotation process (ii) 2 Months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11246 Procure network planning - coomera Quotation process (ii) 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan catchment

A11247 Procure network planning - upper coomera Quotation process (ii) 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan catchment

A11248 Procure network planning - nerang Quotation process (ii) 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan catchment

A11249 Procure network planning - tallebudgera Quotation process (ii) 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan catchment

A11250 Procure network planning - currumbin Quotation process (ii) 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan catchment

A11251 Procure network planning - coolangatta Quotation process (i) 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan catchment

A11252 Procure subject matter experts Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 6 months Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to continuity of a Don Carroll Project Mgt Remove from plan engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Pty Ltd expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Don * Carroll Project Mgt Pty Ltd

A11255 Organisational assessment tools Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11258 LGIP - local park provision Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11259 Schuster park playground proposal Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 8 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11264 Design and construct dda compliance Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan upgrades to ferry pontoons

A11314 Program of heritage unit 2018-19 Culture Strategy Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan 2023

A11319 Cultural mapping and planning Quotation process (i) 4 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11322 Event management of black stump Quotation process (i) 1 Day Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11327 Local government infrastructure plan 2 Quotation process (i) 5 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan assurance review (ti)

A11328 Replacement power and control cabling to Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan elanora sewage treatment plant bioreactor a-f basins A11330 Review of lifeguard services Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11333 Refurbishment of the amenities building at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 6 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan tallebudgera creek tourist park 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 259 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A11336 Supply and install shed at coomera indoor Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 14 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan sports centre

A11338 Springbrook groundwater research Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (ii) 3 years Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Specialised nature of the Remove from plan are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical services that are sought, makes it disadvantageous or to undertake a competitive process impractical to undertake a competitive process 2 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation A11341 Sediment and erosion control project Quotation process (ii) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11343 Construction of bin bay upgrades Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11358 Supply and install switchboard, pole and pit Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan at goodwin park coolangatta

A11366 High impact industry investigation Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11368 Cbd market and research - legal advice Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan overall plan

A11369 Cbd events delivery Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11370 Cbd model and commercial development Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan attraction

A11371 Dtmp implementation: product packaging Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan pilot program

A11372 Dtmp implementation" town planning services Quotation process (i) 1 year Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11373 Social benefit collection bins at ww sites Quotation process (i) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11375 Sewer relining 2019-2020, 2020-2021 Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (iii) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11376 Digital city platform - analytics/ai/blockchain Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan development services

A11377 Digital city platform - frontend development Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 3 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan services

A11378 Design and certification of pedestrian bridge Quotation process (i) 20 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan at tchoobey reserve, burleigh heads

A11379 Social benefit collection bins at water & Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan waste sites

A11380 Sewage gravity network refurbishment Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv)S 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan * A11381 Planned and reactive civil works Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11382 Minor miscellaneous works sewage treatment Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Remove from plan plants and pump stations brought back to Council for consideration * A11383 On demand bulk hard waste collection Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iii) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

A11384 Processing of food waste Quotation process (i) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Remove from plan

C1 - Additional Contracts which went to market and were completed in the quarter (Q4) which were not on the City Contracting Plan

A11386 Supply of retail electricity for large Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (iv)S 3 years - a extension Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Government/LGAQ ERM Business Energy Contract LG314/1210/19/005 awarded to ERM Business Energy for $30,000,000 contestable sites of current contract for arrangement (with or under) 3 years was executed 2. Recommendation to enter into the Significant under CPO delegation Contract be brought back to Council for consideration 3. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to ERM * * Business Energy A11389 Panaya release dynamix Single source: Specialised nature of the services that (i) 4 months Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Specialised nature of the Panaya Ltd Contract LG314/1185/19/062 awarded to Panaya Ltd for $82,039.00 are sought, makes it disadvantageous or impractical services that are sought, makes it disadvantageous or to undertake a competitive process impractical to undertake a competitive process 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Panaya * Ltd A11391 Supply and install power point on cctv pole at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/090 awarded to TEW for $3,756.14 Broadwater Parklands Southport 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 260 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A11392 Irrigation Gainsborough green sports Quotation process (i) 1 months 10 days Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/112 awarded to Total Eden Pty Ltd for $135,050.00 northern sector 2019

A11393 Fencing works Markeri street Quotation process (i) 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/106 awarded to Coastwire Fencing for $40,349.50

A11394 Organics analysis – residential and Quotation process (ii) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/226 awarded to Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Ltd for $89,976.00 commercial service

A11395 Detailed design of the recreational area Quotation process (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/145 awarded to Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd for $47,100.00 renewal for ED Hardy Park

A11396 Design and construction of retaining walls at Quotation process (i) 9 weeks 5 days Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/131 awarded to Australian Rock Walls for $53,007.00 Ashmore community park, Nollamara Park and Coplick Fam A11397 Lease of two way radio space - Springbrook Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 2 years (+2 x 1 year) Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Ongoing licencing, support Vertical Telecoms Pty Contract LG314/411/19/074 awarded to Vertical Telecoms (Qld) Pty Ltd for $36,969.60 maintenance to existing systems making it and maintenance to existing systems making it Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders quotes/tenders 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Vertical * Telecoms Pty Ltd A11398 Irrigation Varsity Lakes central parklands Quotation process (i) 2 weeks 5 days Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/133 awarded to Total Eden Pty Ltd for $109,515.00 spring 2019

A11399 Access upgrades to Cheltenham Park Robina Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 6 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/110 awarded to Aizer Building Solutions Pty Ltd for $26,781.60

A11400 Alberton cemetery water tank and stand Quotation process (i) 4 weeks 4 days Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/111 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $23,115.69 replacement

A11401 Development of an enterprise project Quotation process (i) 16 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/227 awarded to allabout Xpert Australia Pty Limited for $60,192.00 management methodology

A11402 Installation of osprey nesting pole at Mallawa Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/099 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $50,267.40 sports complex

A11403 Rollout of the 2019 NWP30215 certificate iii Quotation process (i) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/195 awarded to Simmonds and Bristow Pty Ltd for $15,102.00 in water industry operations * A11404 Detailed design consultancy for clubhouse Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/231 awarded to BDA Architecture for $156,100.00 building in Gainsborough Greens sports park

A11405 Gold coast special entertainment precinct Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/232 awarded to ASK Consulting Engineers for $61,200.00 acoustic investigation and recommendations * A11406 City plan drafting guidelines Quotation process (i) 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/219 awarded to Ethos Urban Pty Ltd for $27,000.00 * A11407 Optus network and services agreement under Sole source: Statement of licence, legislated (i) 10 weeks 4 days Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Statement of licence, Optus Networks Pty Ltd Contract LG314/1210/19/013 awarded to Optus Networks Pty Ltd for $0,000.00 delegation 2018 to 2019 requirements, third party ownership of assets or legislated requirements, third party ownership of assets industry regulated standards making it impractical to or industry regulated standards making it impractical to invite quotes/tenders invite quotes/tenders 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Optus Networks Pty Ltd A11408 HOTA peace pavilion demolition Quotation process (i) 10 days Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/112 awarded to Coast 2 Coast Earthmoving Pty Ltd for $20,640.00

A11409 Parks design guideline integration within the Quotation process (i) 2 months 3 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/220 awarded to RPS Australia East Pty Ltd for $44,760.00 city plan review

A11410 Construction of nature play at Gilston Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (ii) 16 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/113 awarded to The Landscape Construction Company Pty. Ltd. for $342,783.15

A11411 Generate program version 2 Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 years 2 months (+1 x Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to The unique or proprietary Salamanca Arts Centre Contract LG314/621/19/22 awarded to Salamanca Arts Centre for $250,000.00 goods or services being sought has no suitable 1 year) nature of the goods or services being sought has no alternatives available suitable alternatives available 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to * Salamanca Arts Centre A11412 Performanc review analysis and remediation Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 1 years Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to The unique or proprietary Ikara Group Pty Ltd Contract LG314/1185/19/065 awarded to Ikara Group Pty Ltd for $34,760.00 for LGP goods or services being sought has no suitable nature of the goods or services being sought has no alternatives available suitable alternatives available 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Ikara * Group Pty Ltd A11413 Refurbishment of the John Cunningham Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/121 awarded to Rocket Building Services Pty Ltd for $59,300.00 lifeguard amenities

A11414 Supply and install of shelters and furniture at Quotation process (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/148 awarded to Moodie Outdoor Products Pty Ltd for $51,915.00 Helensvale rugby park * A11416 Gold coast bmx freestyle jump maintenance Quotation process (i) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/142 awarded to Deluxe Dirt Innovations Pty Ltd for $216,635.00 * A11417 Path repair mangroves to mountains Gold Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/145 awarded to Skyline Landscape Services (Qld) Pty Ltd for $49,910.41 Coast Botanical Gardens

A11418 Robina Parkland investigation Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/234 awarded to Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd for $35,096.00 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 261 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A11419 Jacobs Well skate park maintenance Quotation process (i) 2 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/15 awarded to Total Grind N Polish for $4,549.60

A11420 Mudgeeraba and Nerang skate park Quotation process (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/150 awarded to Davidson Enterprises (Qld) Pty Ltd for $34,096.70 maintenance

A11421 Certificate iv in leadership and management Quotation process (i) 18 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/235 awarded to Institute of Management (IM) for $49,920.00 * A11422 Monthly satellite derived bathymetry Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (ii) 12 months (+1 x 2 Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to The unique or proprietary Fugro Australia Marine Contract LG314/621/19/238 awarded to Fugro Australia Marine Pty Ltd for $132,600.00 goods or services being sought has no suitable months) nature of the goods or services being sought has no Pty Ltd alternatives available suitable alternatives available 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Fugro * Australia Marine Pty Ltd A11423 Timber deck construction at Broadbeach Mall Quotation process (i) 5 weeks 2 days Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/113 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $125,702.83 Carousel

A11424 Supply and install stainless steel bollards at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/114 awarded to Fencepac Commercial Pty Ltd for $26,484.00 Gold Coast precinct Carrara * A11425 Pedestrian pathway lighting at Miami depot Quotation process (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/108 awarded to Orca Solar Lighting Pty Ltd for $20,405.00

A11426 Painting Broadwater tourist park Quotation process (i) 1 months 15 days Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/109 awarded to Usher & Son Coatings Pty Ltd for $93,920.00

A11427 Traffic signal upgrade at Babbidge street and Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 8 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/138 awarded to CB Energy Pty Ltd for $18,152.98 Mattocks road

A11428 Narrowneck lifeguard centre storage shed Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/115 awarded to Maintain Australia Pty Ltd for $25,519.00 roof replacement

A11429 Footpath upgrade at Mawarra Street Surfers Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/124 awarded to Allrange Electrical Services Pty Ltd for $19,343.00 Paradise

A11430 Transport improvements Sea World dr to Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 3 months 3 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/240 awarded to WSP Australia Pty Limited for $44,856.50 Richards ct Macarthur pd - Main Beach pde

A11431 Supply and install Mallawa & Glennon sports Quotation process (i) 9 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/157 awarded to SS Irrigation for $135,583.00 mainline irrigation

A11432 Design of stormwater drainage improvements Quotation process (i) 11 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/239 awarded to Complete Urban Solutions Pty Ltd for $32,336.00 at Sonia street, Mermaid Waters

A11433 Master media advertising services (bcc Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Zenith Media Contract LG314/1210/19/014 awarded to Zenith Media for $300,000.00 510944-000) * A11434 Cabin refurbishment at Burleigh Beach and Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/11 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $423,044.12 Jacobs Well tourist parks

A11435 Preliminary design of HOTA ferry terminal Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 4 weeks Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Continuity of a ARUP Contract LG314/621/19/243 awarded to ARUP for $39,650.00 engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to invite quotes/tenders 2 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to ARUP A11436 Supply and install irrigation system along Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/128 awarded to Total Eden Pty Ltd for $138,000.00 Surfers Paradise foreshore

A11439 Supply of specialised pontoon for Broadwater Quotation process (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/19/07 awarded to Superior Jetties for $60,516.00 Parklands swimming enclosure

A11440 First start trainee program 2019 Quotation process (i) 18 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/19/076 awarded to HGT Australia LTD for $226,300.00

A11441 Horizontal directional drill subject matter Quotation process (i) 15 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/20/003 awarded to Trenchless Advisor Pty Ltd for $54,000.00 expert for the relocation of srm at Isle of Capri bridge A11442 Replacement of floor tiles at Harley park Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 15 days Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/130 awarded to Maintain Australia Pty Ltd for $6,710.50 public amenities

A11444 Identification and prioritisation of potential Quotation process (i) 7 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/229 awarded to GHD Pty Ltd for $77,274.00 rock fall hazards on city managed land

A11445 Design, supply and install shade structure at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 8 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/122 awarded to Shade 'n Net (Australia) Pty. Ltd. for $41,260.00 Hart Park Broadbeach

A11446 Audit leadership council Sole source: (i) 2 years Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Gartner Australasia Pty Contract LG314/621/19/247 awarded to Gartner Australasia Pty Ltd for $73,810.00 Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training Memberships/subscriptions/conferences/training where Ltd where alternatives do not practically exist alternatives do not practically exist 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Gartner * Australasia Pty Ltd A11447 Miami High school car park lighting Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/125 awarded to Allrange Electrical Services Pty Ltd for $21,355.00

A11448 Fabricate and install sign shelter at Shuster Quotation process (i) 5 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/126 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $23,178.51 Park Tallebudgera 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 262 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A11451 Rufous whistler shade sails Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/120 awarded to Vector Shade Structures Pty Ltd for $26,000.00

A11452 The graduate certificate in leadership and Utilise a government/LGAQ arrangement (i) 18 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Griffith University Contract LG314/1210/19/015 awarded to Griffith University for $300,000.00 management

A11453 Reinstallation of fitness equipment Surfers Quotation process (i) 1 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/170 awarded to Willplay Pty Ltd for $9,089.00 Paradise * A11458 Roadmap for transport data Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/193 awarded to Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd for $67,040.00

A11459 Parks statistician consultancy Sole source: The unique or proprietary nature of the (i) 3 months Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to The unique or proprietary Principal Contract awarded by PO 3000319457 to Integrated Open Space Services Pty Ltd for $14,390 goods or services being sought has no suitable nature of the goods or services being sought has no alternatives available suitable alternatives available 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Principal

A11475 Council contract representative training Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Continuity of a Arcblue Consulting Pty Contract awarded by PO 3000331084 to Arcblue Consulting Pty Ltd for $92,000 sessions engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the Ltd expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to invite quotes/tenders 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Arcblue Consulting Pty Ltd A11476 FME Safe software Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Ongoing licencing, support Locus Global Australia Contract awarded by PO 3000304136 to Locus Global Australia Pty Ltd for $21,726 maintenance to existing systems making it and maintenance to existing systems making it Pty Ltd disadvantageous or impractical to invite disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders quotes/tenders 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Locus Global Australia Pty Ltd A11477 Idra intersection enterprise Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Ongoing licencing, support Akcelik and Associates Contract awarded by PO 3000295764 to Akcelik and Associates for $8,250 maintenance to existing systems making it and maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders quotes/tenders 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Akcelik and Associates A11478 Aimsun 8 advanced Sole source: Ongoing licencing, support and (i) 1 year Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Ongoing licencing, support Aimsun Pty Ltd Contract awarded by PO 3000311747 to Aimsun Pty Ltd for $5,000 maintenance to existing systems making it and maintenance to existing systems making it disadvantageous or impractical to invite disadvantageous or impractical to invite quotes/tenders quotes/tenders 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Aimsun Pty Ltd A11479 Design and construction of maintenance Quotation process (i) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/141 awarded to Akela Constructions Pty Ltd for $219,839.64 shed at Musgrave Sports Park

C2 - Additional Contracts which went to market in Q4 and will be completed in 2019-20, which were not on the City Contracting Plan

A11387 Stainless steel and other cleaning Quotation process (i) 2 years (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/059 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A11388 Supply and install a new lifeguard tower at Quotation process (i) 10 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/130 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 the spit main beach

A11390 Design and scoping for the refurbishment of Quotation process (iii) 8 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/19/221 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 sewer pump station B49 and condition assessment wet well A11415 Repairs to gates & fence to Jacobs Well Quotation process (i) 3 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/147 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 tourist park

A11437 Design and construct yacht launching Quotation process (ii) 12 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/162 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 platform at Emerald Lakes

A11438 Laycock st, Surfers South Paradise to First Quotation process (i) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/621/20/002 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 ave, Broadbeach

A11443 Collection, transportation and processing of Quotation process (i) 10 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/19/084 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 bulk green waste

A11449 Tableau licences and adhoc support Quotation process (iii) 12 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1185/18/034 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A11450 Construction of a hydrant enclosure at Karp Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 8 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/137 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 Court

A11454 Pool heaters to Tallebudgera & Broadwater Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/138 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 tourist parks

A11455 Fabricate and install shelter at Ernie Tebb Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 6 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/13 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 Park Burleigh Waters

A11456 Concrete works at Surfers Paradise Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 1 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/133 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 Esplanade

A11457 Design, supply and install shade structure at Quotation process (i) 8 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/134 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 Peachey Park, Ormeau

A11460 Karp Court entry sign Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/106 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 263 Events, Tourism & Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report ITEM 7 (Continued) CITY CONTRACTING PLAN 2018-19 FINAL ACQUITTAL Ref. Purpose Alignment to Sourcing Method Contract REDACTED Expected Contract Expected Recommendation Contract Supplier is Actions to Take Q4 Corporate Type* Duration + Extension time to award to be not local in Supplier Strategies, Option(s) market referred back accordance (Single/Sole Operational (financial to Council with and Corporate year) Council's sourcing) Plans Policy

A11461 Minor miscelaneous works at water and Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iv) 1 year (+2 x 1 year) Q4 Recommendation to enter into the arrangement(s) be Contract LG314/1211/19/165 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 waste facilities brought back to Council for consideration * A11462 Sodium hypochlorite pipe work replacement Quotation process (ii) 10 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/153 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 at Coombabah sewage treatment plant

A11463 Planned and reactive civil works Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (iii) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/164 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A11464 Site restoration services Quotation process (i) 2 years (+3 x 1 year) Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/19/072 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A11465 Maintenance and servicing of sports Quotation process (i) 2 years Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/117 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 equipment

A11466 Playground replacement works 2019/20 Public Invitation to Offer (ITO) (i) 50 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/19/152 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

A11467 Electrical distribution board upgrade at Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/123 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 Jacobs Well tourist park

A11468 Replacement of penstock for chlorine contact Quotation process (ii) 6 months Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/20/009 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 c and d at Elanora sewage treatment plant

A11469 Design, supply and installation of sheet piling Quotation process (ii) 6 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/1211/20/006 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 at Boundary street, Currumbin Waters stage two A11470 Design and construct replacement shelter, Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 6 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/19/139 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 slab and seating at Bochow Park, Natural Bridge A11471 Coating to existing polished concrete floors Single source: Continuity of a previous/current (i) 1 year (+1 x 1 year) Q4 1. Council is satisfied due to Continuity of a Southeast Floors Pty Ltd Contract LG314/690/19/136 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 at Coomera indoor sports centre engagement is required to maintain the continuity of previous/current engagement is required to maintain the expert advice, making it disadvantageous or continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous impractical to invite quotes/tenders or impractical to invite quotes/tenders 2. Contract(s) be awarded under delegation to Southeast Floors Pty Ltd A11472 Design and construction of sodium Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (ii) 6 months 2 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/14/009 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 hypochlorite dosing hatches and dosing pipes for reservoir at vari A11473 Installation of pathway lighting at Helen Park, Quotation(s) from existing arrangement(s) (i) 4 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/690/20/006 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20 Main Beach

A11474 Turf amendments bulka bags spring 2019 Quotation process (i) 6 weeks Q4 Contract(s) be awarded under delegation Contract LG314/411/19/086 out to market, to be awarded 2019-20

Other - Additional changes to Acquittal 779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 264 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 ORGANISATIONAL SERVICES 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14) Refer Confidential Attachments 1 - 3

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY

1.1 I recommend that this report and attachments be considered in Closed Session pursuant to section 275 (1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the reason that the matter involves: (h) other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage. 1.2 I recommend that the report and attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Not applicable. 3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

This report provides Council with an update of the arrears position of the rates, water and sundry debtor portfolios as at 30 June 2019.

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS Not applicable. 5 DISCUSSION The January – June 2019 period again saw activities being undertaken in the Pathway software for the first time. The Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy advised they would not be providing a revaluation of the City for the 2019-20 financial year. This has not occurred since 2009 and required a different process to be undertaken to enable a rateable valuation to be calculated for the 19-20 year. Other operational activities also included work-around processes to redress known issues. Activities required to be undertaken semi-annually and annually were actioned at the appropriate times. Advanced recovery action on existing cases and including Sale of Land activity still remained a priority for the Debtor Management Teams. An item resolving a further 182 properties to undergo the Sale of Land process was placed before Council in April. Implementation of the actions associated with the intermediate debt recovery steps is progressing and expected to be fully operational during the first quarter of 2019-20.

5.1 Rates and Water Debtor Portfolio

5.1.1 Rate and Water Levies

Table 1 (below) shows the comparison of levies raised for the previous year (2017-18) and the 2018-19 financial year. The current financial year reflects a 5.5% increase for rate levies with water levies increasing by 0.9% resulting in a 3.6% increase in total levies for the financial year compared to the prior year.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 265 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 (Continued) 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14)

Table 1 Comparison of Levies Raised as at 30 June Year Rates Water Total 2017-18 $709.6m $498.5m $1.21b 2018-19 $748.5m $502.9m $1.25b

5.1.2 Rate and Water Arrears

Council finished the financial year with $65.4m unpaid in relation to rates and water accounts. This data shows an increase of $1.4m in relation to the combined arrears when compared to 2017-18. The Balance Outstanding percentage decreased from 5.3% (2017-18) to 5.2% (2018-19). Table 2 below reflects this data.

Table 2 Comparison of Outstanding Balances as at 30 June Arrears Year Rates Water Total Outstanding % 2017-18 $39,230,493 $24,832,229 $64,062,723 5.3% 2018-19 $37,296,312 $28,138,012 $65,434,324 5.2%

When compared to this time last year, the balance outstanding for water accounts increased from $24.8m to $28.1m (13%) while the rate debt decreased from $39.2m to $37.3m (-5%). The proportion of the rates and water debt to the total debt moved from 61:39 for 2017-18 to 57:43 for 2018-19. This proportion reveals that the arrears associated with rate accounts is decreasing while the arrears associated with water accounts is increasing.

The balance outstanding at June ’19 would have been significantly higher except that full recovery of an ‘at-risk’ debt occurred.

After extensive negotiations with one of the former owners of property located at Hope Island and senior Council officers, an application was brought before the Court to extinguish the community title scheme (CTS) and amalgamate the property into a single title. In February 2018, the Court appointed an Administrator to oversee the sale of the property.

REDACTED iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii. The Administrator then set about preparing the new single lot for sale. A contract of sale settled 28 June 2019.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 266 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 (Continued) 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14)

This was a great outcome for the City as there was a not insignificant risk that the full rate and water debt may not have been recovered.

5.1.3 Rate and Water True Overdue Percentage

The True Overdue percentage for each financial year from the 2009-10 financial year onwards is shown in the graph below. The True Overdue percentage is a more meaningful measure and differs from the Arrears Outstanding percent as it excludes • levies that are issued but not yet due, • levies subject to deferral, and • levies not being pursued that are considered in dispute.

When the above exemptions are taken into consideration, the 2018-19 result is 4.8%. This result shows a minor increase compared to the previous year which ended the run of 5 successive years where decreased arrears results had been achieved. The graph below shows the end of year True Overdue % for the past decade. Table 3

End of Year True Overdue % 7%

6.42%

5.80% 5.89% 6%

5.33%

5% 4.82% 4.69% 4.44%

4% 3.91% 3.66%

3.24%

3% 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10

REDACTED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 267 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 (Continued) 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14)

REDACTED IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII the True Overdue percentage is expected to substantially decrease by 30 June 2020.

The review of the Recovery Profile (Attachment 1) shows a decrease of 35% in the number of accounts (- 26,556) within the debtor’s portfolio. However the average debt per account has increased 58% when compared to the same time last year. In 2017-18, the average debt associated with the 75,486 rate and water accounts not fully paid was approximately $850. In 2018-19, the average debt increased to $1,340 – an increase of 58%.

This indicates that the lower number of accounts have larger balances outstanding. This is consistent with the view that the increased action taken during the initial recovery phases reduced the number of accounts outstanding but without the latter (more advanced) stages of recovery being implemented those accounts remaining outstanding have a higher balance outstanding due to the continual issue of rates and water notices.

As at 30 June 2019, there were 689 accounts representing a debt of $3.5m outsourced for advanced recovery action. When compared with the 2,053 cases ($6.3m) at the same time 12 months earlier this represents a decrease of 44% of the value at the advanced recovery stage.

This decrease is due to the fact that increased focus could be placed upon existing accounts at this level of recovery with only limited numbers of new matters being manually identified and advanced to the advanced recovery stage.

5.1.4 Rate and Water Arrangements to Pay

Arrangements to Pay (PA) were again offered to customers who encountered financial difficulty and were unable to remit full payment by the due date. Information regarding the Arrangements to Pay (Rates) created for the January – March 2018 period was not available so the below information and graphs relate to the number and value of Payment Arrangements in place as at 30 June 2018 and 2019 year.

The graphs show that the number of current Arrangements to Pay as at 30 June 2019 reduced significantly (14,539 in 2017-18 to 9,084 in 2018-19) or 38% with rates accounting for the major reduction (59%) and water accounting for a slight increase (12%).

Unsurprising, the movement of the value subject to current payment arrangements mirrored the trends set by the numbers when comparing June ’19 to the previous year. The quantum of rate debt subject to Arrangements to Pay decreased by 53% while in Water the amount increased by 4%.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 268 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 (Continued) 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14)

Number of Payment Value of Payment Arrangements Arrangements 16,000 $16,000,000

14,000 $14,000,000

4,225

12,000 $12,000,000 $4,267,295

10,000 $10,000,000

8,000 $8,000,000

4,745 6,000 $6,000,000 $4,455,251 10,514

4,000 $4,000,000 $11,072,719

2,000 4,339 $2,000,000 $5,174,540

- $0 June '18 June '19 June '18 June '19

Rates Water Rates Water

It is interesting to note that while the number and total value of Rates debt in Arrangements to Pay decreased the average debt per assessment increased by 13% ($1,053 to $1,193). Conversely, while both the number and amount of Water accounts subject to Arrangements to Pay both increased the average debt per account decreased by 7% ($1,010 to $939).

5.1.5 Sale of Land

At its meeting of 30 April December 2019, Council resolved to undertake Sale of Land action on 182 properties. Arrears in excess of $2.5m were associated with these properties. Of these, 40 have been fully paid ($607k) with 10 properties scheduled to go to auction on 19 September while the remaining 132 properties have not exhausted the statutory period required.

5.2 Accounts Receivable - Sundry Debts

REDACTED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 269 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 (Continued) 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14)

Page 269 REDACTED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 270 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 (Continued) 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14)

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

Theme Supporting the delivery of the Gold Coast 2020 B We manage the city responsibly Our stewardship of the city provides value for money for ratepayers

7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS

Within existing approved budget.

8 RISK MANAGEMENT

Not applicable.

9 STATUTORY MATTERS

Local Government Act and Regulation.

10 COUNCIL POLICIES

Debt Recovery Policy.

11 DELEGATIONS

Delegation 2021 states “To write-off or waive non-rate debt where the debt remains unpaid and there is a legitimate basis for deciding the outstanding amount is not legally or practically recoverable including but not limited to circumstances where a debtor is under an administrator, insolvent, bankrupt or deregistered.”

This delegation also requires a report to be provided to Council on a quarterly basis.

12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION

Name and/or Title of the Stakeholder Directorate or Is the Stakeholder Satisfied Consulted Organisation With Content of Report and Recommendations (Yes/No) (comment as appropriate) Hardie Ryan Organisational Yes A/Coordinator Receivables Services Management Emily Barker Organisational Yes A/Supervisor Debtor Management Services Karen O’Brien Water and Yes Manager Business Performance Waste

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 271 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 (Continued) 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14)

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS

All rate, water and sundry debtors who fail to make arrangements to satisfy their debt with Council will be pursued in a more expeditious manner, where possible. It is anticipated that this action will result in a reduction to Council’s arrears position. This would be determined by the end of year True Overdue percentage.

14 TIMING As soon as possible.

15 CONCLUSION

Debt recovery action continues in accordance with the adopted Policy where possible. Delays have been encountered due to issues associated with the implementation of some of the recovery functionality in the Pathway rates module (LGP). The Sale of Land action continues and is expected to realise further reductions in the rate and water debt portfolio. While the trend of reducing arrears year-on-year has ended, explanations have been provided.

A positive outlook for an improved result at the conclusion of the 2019-20 financial year is expected.

16 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council resolve as follows: 1 That the report and attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009. 2 That Council note the combined rate and water arrears position as at 30 June 2019. 3 That Council note the position of outstanding Accounts Receivable (Sundry Debtors) debts as at 30 June 2019.

Author Authorised by: Leigh Jackson Grant Mather A/Executive Coordinator Revenue Services A/Director Organisational Services 29 August 2019 (TRACKS REF: 74236607)

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.008 moved Cr Owen-Jones seconded Cr PC Young

1 That the report and attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009. 2 That Council note the combined rate and water arrears position as at 30 June 2019. 3 That Council note the position of outstanding Accounts Receivable (Sundry Debtors) debts as at 30 June 2019.

CARRIED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 272 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 (Continued) 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14)

Attachment 1 REDACTED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 273 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 8 (Continued) 2018-19 RATES AND WATER DEBT MANAGEMENT REPORT – 2ND HALF YEAR RV36/188/-(P14)

Attachments 2 & 3 REDACTED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 274 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 9 ORGANISATIONAL SERVICES/REVENUE SERVICES RATIFICATION OF WATER ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENT PN324476/36(P1)

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY

1.1 I recommend that this report be considered in Closed Session pursuant to section 275 (1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the reason that the matter involves (d) rating concessions. 1.2 I recommend that the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Not Applicable.

3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

This report provides Council the details surrounding information of the need to make an adjustment to the water account and seek Council’s ratification of the agreement reached.

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS

Not Applicable.

5 DISCUSSION

The ratepayer’s water and sewerage charges have included a variable sewage discharge factor since 1 July 2003. This is consistent with the City’s rating policies to reflect the unique sewage discharge volumes and patterns of the processing plant and charge accordingly.

The City reads the sewage discharge meter on the subject property every six months to enable regular adjustment of the variable sewage discharge factor to reflect changing sewage discharge patterns. In 2017, the City confirmed that the discharge factors for the subject periods were incorrect REDACTED …………………………………………………….. The error was due to a combination of a problem in the discharge factor calculation tool and changes to the meter during recalibration which resulted in water consumption data displayed on the meter being abnormally adjusted.

Extended negotiations with the ratepayer were conducted regarding recovery of the amended charges. These negotiations included challenges to the meter reading data and calculations associated with the recalibration changes, REDACTED …….…………………..

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 275 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 9 (Continued) RATIFICATION OF WATER ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENT PN324476/36(P1)

This settlement is a negotiated REDACTED resolution of an extended water and sewerage account dispute between the City and the ratepayer REDACTED ………………………..

The appropriate settlement payment was received within the nominated timeframe.

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

Theme Supporting the delivery of the Gold Coast 2020 B We manage the city responsibly Our stewardship of the city provides value for money for ratepayers

7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS

Budget/Funding Considerations

The expense associated with the write-off will be recognised in the current financial year.

People and Culture

Not applicable

8 RISK MANAGEMENT

Not applicable.

9 STATUTORY MATTERS

Local Government Act, Local Government Regulation.

10 COUNCIL POLICIES

Debt Recovery Policy.

11 DELEGATIONS

Delegation 2246 grants the power to “To write-off or waive rate debt where the debt remains unpaid and there is a legitimate basis for deciding the outstanding amount is not legally or practically recoverable including circumstances where a debtor is under an administrator, insolvent, bankrupt or deregistered.” This delegation also requires a report being presented to Council quarterly detailing amounts written off.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 276 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 9 (Continued) RATIFICATION OF WATER ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENT PN324476/36(P1)

12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION

Name and/or Title of the Directorate or Is the Stakeholder Satisfied Stakeholder Consulted Organisation With Content of Report and Recommendations (Yes/No) (comment as appropriate) Director Water and Waste Water and Waste Yes (Paul Heaton) A/Director Organisational Organisational Services Yes Services (Grant Mather) Manager Customer Water and Waste Yes Engagement (Chris Owen) A/’Coordinator Receivables Organisational Services Yes Management (Hardie Ryan)

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS

External / community stakeholder Impacts . Management of the ratepayer were engaged regularly throughout this process.

Internal (Organisational) Stakeholder Impacts . Customer Engagement Officers (W & W) and Revenue Services Officers (OS)

14 TIMING

Adjustments should be actioned as soon as possible.

15 CONCLUSION

In the circumstances surrounding this matter, it is considered an exercise of good local government decision-making to facilitate the commercial settlement obtained in this case.

16 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:

1 That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009. 2 That Council notes the commercial settlement and ratifies the decision of senior officers to finalise the matter.

Author: Authorised by: Leigh Jackson Grant Mather A/Executive Coordinator Revenue Services A/Director Organisational Services 27 August 2019 TRACKS REF: 74309127

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 277 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 9 (Continued) RATIFICATION OF WATER ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENT PN324476/36(P1)

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.009 moved Cr Owen-Jones seconded Cr PC Young

CARRIED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 278 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 10 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER MAJOR EVENT OPPORTUNITY CS105/274/2019(P1)

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY

1.1 I recommend that this report be considered in Closed Session pursuant to section 275 (1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the reason that the matter involves: (e) contracts proposed to be made by it; and (h) other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage. 1.2 I recommend that the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Not Applicable. 3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

The purpose of this report is to consider an investment into a boxing event proposed to be held at Cbus Super Stadium, Robina in November 2019.

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS Not Applicable. 5 DISCUSSION

5.1 Applicant

Steven Wijangco Director DDP Sports Suite 1, 47 Park Road, Milton, Queensland [email protected] www.ddpsports.com 0431 460 855

5.2 Event Background

The City Events Unit was approached by a boxing Promoter in late July 2019, regarding a proposal to host a boxing event (Mundine versus Parr) headlined by Anthony Mundine (refer Figure 1 below) on the Gold Coast in November 2019.

The Promoter has advised that Anthony Mundine has featured in some of the biggest live boxing events in Australian sports history including 35,000 people attending the Danny Green (bout one event) at the Sydney Football Stadium and 27,000 for the bout two event. The Promoter also advised that Anthony Mundine has featured in some of the highest rating ‘pay per view’ fights in Australian boxing history, with 4.5 million watching the Mundine versus Green fights.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 279 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 10 (Continued) MAJOR EVENT OPPORTUNITY CS105/274/2019(P1)

Figure 1 – Mundine versus Parr event advertisement 5.3 The Promoter Mundine versus Parr is a co-promotion between DDP Sports Management and BOXA.

DDP Sports Management Pty Ltd is a business comprising Gold Coast owner Danny Dimas, Paul Keegan, Steven Wijangco and world number one ranked fighter Dennis Hogan. DDP Sports has promoted multiple Australian top five world ranked athletes that are competing for legitimate World Championship Titles, such as Gold Coast based, world No. 2 athlete, Rohan Murdock and World No.1 ranked athlete, Dennis Hogan.

BOXA is the promotional and clothing brand company of Anthony Mundine. BOXA has promoted the biggest boxing events in Australia for two decades including Mundine versus Green bouts I & II.

5.4 Athlete Summary Anthony Mundine- Anthony “The Man” Mundine is a three-time world champion who has held titles in the super- middleweight and junior middleweight division. He scored a 3rd round knockout in his recent fight against talented middleweight Tommy Browne in January 2018. His trademark speed and natural instincts make him one of boxing’s most exciting fighters. Mundine has defeated former world champions "Sugar" Shane Mosely, Antwun Echols, Sam Soliman, Danny Green and the previously undefeated Sergey Rabchenko. Before turning to boxing, Mundine was a rugby league player with the St George Dragons and Brisbane Broncos.

John Wayne Parr- John Wayne "The Gunslinger" Parr, is a Gold Coast based Australian kickboxer and boxer. He is a former 10-time World Champion and was the runner up on The Contender Asia. In 2001, Parr shifted his focus to boxing again. After seven consecutive boxing victories since 1998, he fought against Andriy Khamula for the vacant Australian boxing title at Middleweight in 2001. He won the championship by TKO in round ten and got his first boxing title. Parr boasts a record of 99 wins in Muay Thai and is contesting for his 100th win in August in Japan.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 280 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 10 (Continued) MAJOR EVENT OPPORTUNITY CS105/274/2019(P1)

REDACTED

5.6 Marketing

Broadcast-

REDACTED

Digital-

A dedicated social content plan is currently under development. A series of content pieces is also under development and will be distributed through influencers, athletes and other event partners, including Anthony Mundine (43,000 followers on Twitter) and John Wayne Parr (28,200 followers on Twitter).

Public Relations-

A full schedule is in development and will include community events, press conference and media calls.

5.7 Investment Requested

The Promoter is seeking an investment of-

• REDACTED • REDACTED

REDACTED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 281 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 10 (Continued) MAJOR EVENT OPPORTUNITY CS105/274/2019(P1)

5.8 Outcomes / Benefits

Economic Impact- over 25% of interested pre sales for a Mundine versus Parr fight are from international and interstate customers. As an example, 36% travelled from outside South Australia for the Mundine versus Green II event. The projected economic impact of this event where the audience size is 12,000 (with 75% travelling to the Gold Coast from outside the region), is in the vicinity of $2 to $2.5 million.

City Promotion- promotion of the destination would be via any broadcast. For example, the Mundine versus Horn and Mundine versus Green II delivered a cumulative ad rate of REDACTED .

REDACTED

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

2.0 Prosperity built on a strong diverse economy 2.5 We are a globally recognised tourism destination. Our city attracts visitors from all over the world. 3.0 People contribute to a strong community spirit 3.2 We are proud of our city. 3.6 We are an active and healthy community. We enjoy our city and its enviable climate.

7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS

REDACTED

• REDACTED

• • Any balance available in the Events Reserve.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 282 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 10 (Continued) MAJOR EVENT OPPORTUNITY CS105/274/2019(P1)

8 RISK MANAGEMENT

Operational risks regarding the event will be assessed and addressed as detailed planning and preparation evolves.

9 STATUTORY MATTERS

Not Applicable.

10 COUNCIL POLICIES

Not Applicable.

11 DELEGATIONS

Not Applicable.

12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION

The following internal and external stakeholders have been involved to date:

Name and/or Title of the Directorate or Organisation Stakeholder Satisfied Stakeholder Consulted With Content of Report Molly MacLaren, Manager Destination Gold Coast Yes Domestic Marketing

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS

The event may have a positive impact on the tourism sector in a pre-school holiday period.

14 TIMING

The event will be held on Saturday 30 November 2019. This is the final weekend of the NSW / Victoria Schoolies period and it is also the same day as the inaugural SandTunes Music Festival that will be held at Metricon Stadium.

The Promoter may choose to launch the event in mid-September.

15 CONCLUSION

The City Events Unit was approached by a boxing Promoter in late July 2019, regarding a proposal to host a boxing event headlined by Anthony Mundine on the Gold Coast in November 2019.

REDACTED

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 283 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

ITEM 10 (Continued) MAJOR EVENT OPPORTUNITY CS105/274/2019(P1)

REDACTED

The Promoter may choose to announce that the event will be going ahead on the Gold Coast in mid-September.

While it is important that Gold Coast stadiums are able to attract one-off events outside of regular rugby league fixtures, it is not recommended that Council invest in this event due to:

• REDACTED

• the short lead time does not allow for any investment to be properly leveraged (including that the event may already be announced / launched prior to Council’s consideration of the opportunity); • REDACTED

16 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:

1 That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009. 2 That the applicant (DDP Sports) be advised that Council is unable to provide an investment into this event for the reasons listed in the report. 3 That Council remains very supportive of the event content being placed into Gold Coast stadiums.

Author: Authorised by: Steve Brook Joe McCabe Executive Officer Events (Acting) Chief Operating Officer 2 August 2019

TRACKS REF: 74341460

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ETG19.0917.010 moved Cr Gates seconded Cr PC Young

1 That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009. 2 That the applicant (DDP Sports) be advised that Council is unable to provide an investment into this event for the reasons listed in the report. 3 That Council remains very supportive of the event content being placed into Gold Coast stadiums.

CARRIED

There being no further business the meeting closed at 2.17pm.

779th Council Meeting 20 September 2019 284 Events Tourism And Governance Committee Meeting 17 September 2019 Adopted Report

These Pages

Numbered 1 to 284

Constitute The Adopted Report Of The Meeting

Of The Events Tourism and Governance Committee

Held Tuesday 17 September 2019