DOCSLIB.ORG

Assisting a World on the Move

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assisting a World on the Move RO Nairobi Newsletter December 2013 ASSISTING A WORLD ON THE MOVE INSIDE THIS ISSUE 1. IOM provides humanitarian assistance to expelled migrants from Tanzania 2. IOM Ethiopia deals with an influx of Ethiopian migrants from Saudi Arabia 3. Inter-agency efforts in Turkana, Kenya, strive for building resilience among pastoralist communities 4. IOM boosts efforts for sustainable reintegration for Rwandan returnees 5. Tanzania rolls out e-system for residence permits 6. Regional director holds key talks with Ugandan ministers. IOM PROVIDES EMERgEncy ASSISTAncE TO ExPEllED MIgRAnts from TAnzAnIA On 25 July 2013, Tanzania’s President Kikwete In Burundi, a joint rapid assessment As of 15 December, IOM and its in transit centres or in areas of return. gave a public directive that all migrants in conducted by IOM, partner UN agencies partners continued to register, at a the Kagera region without “valid residential and NGOs, to assess the needs and gaps of lower scale, new arrivals in Rwanda, The Rwandan Government now plans documents”, had to leave the country by returning Burundians in the provinces of Burundi and Uganda. Following the close the transit centres by end of 11 August 2013, or be forcibly removed by Rutana and Muyinga concluded that the annual presidential pardon granted to January 2014, as it focuses on relocating security forces. Although it is estimated that situation would likely worsen over time if prisoners by the President of Tanzania over 6,000 migrants who have no home Kagera Region had an estimated 35,000 nothing was done, as the expelled migrants on 9 December, a group of 76 young areas to return to. These migrants will be irregular migrants, it was made clear by the continued to exert pressure on the already Burundian men arrived in Burundi, resettled in districts designated by the UN in Tanzania, that these migrants were not poor host population. having been released from prisons. government. refugees. The majority of the migrants were from Burundi, Rwanda, and Uganda. There were fears of disease outbreaks The arriving migrants in Burundi are The government acknowledges the especially as the cold weather progressed. registered at the entry points, allowing provision of reintegration assistance Due to President Kikwete’s directive, an Risks of diarrhoea, malaria, conjunctivitis, them to access food rations and for all the expelled migrants as most estimated caseload of up to 35,000 individuals respiratory diseases, cholera (which was transportation assistance to areas of pressing. These migrants are in need of was expected to return to Burundi, Rwanda already prevalent in some return provinces), origin. The Ministry of National Solidarity sustainable livelihoods and shelter. and Uganda. As of 15 December 2013, over deteriorating health and sanitary conditions. continues committed to coordinate In Uganda, health challenges in Sango- 55,000 individuals had crossed the Tanzanian the ongoing response to the expelled Bay continued unabated with clinics border into Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi, IOM took lead and provided assistance in migrants situation. IOM is currently treating increased cases of malaria with Burundi receiving the largest caseload of information management systems, set up building a new transit centre in Rutana and upper respiratory tract infections. over 37,000 migrnats. of transit centres near strategic and main and rehabilitating two transit centres in However, cases of watery diarrhoea have entry points; in coordination with WFP and Makamba and Muyinga. The work on the decreased, while cases of severe acute “We did not have time to prepare. Police were FAO, organized return packages and provided transit centres follows a recommendation malnourishment of children under the arresting ‘visitors’, they asked us where our transportation assistance to returnee’s area of by an inter-agency working group to age of 5 years have spiked. homes were and depending on your answer, origin. improve their conditions. IOM, WFP, FAO you were transported to Burundi, Rwanda and UNICEF continue to provide food and IOM and partners continue to provide or Uganda. We were not allowed to pick The situation was similar in Uganda where Non-Food Items to the most vulnerable the much needed assistance for the anything”. This were the sentiment shared by a joint assessment team of IOM and individuals among the expelled migrants expelled migrants. majority of the migrants. Uganda’s Directorate of Immigration and Citizenship was undertaken to determine the Many of the migrants crossing the border are humanitarian needs of Ugandan and Rwandan agriculturalists and livestock farmers, many of expelled migrants in Rakai and Isingiro areas. whom were not authorized to take their cattle The assessments established that urgent need with them. Most arrived without any means for WASH facilities in Sango bay where the of survival as their possessions were left in migrants initially settled on arrival. Health Tanzania, or had to be sold at a low price due facilities were overstretched, shelter needs to the impending deadline of departure. were high and access to food was a concern. IOM took lead in the post arrival assistance of the expelled migrants in Burundi and provided transportation assistance from the reception centres to areas of origin, as well to transit centres, for migrants who did not have known homes. In Rwanda, the government took lead in identifying areas of origin for the migrants and coordinated with IOM in providing their Shelter, food and NFIs were of great concern at the beginning of the emergency response. transportation home. Children arrived mulnourished with many in need of medical attention FormerB URUnDIAn REfUgees STIll In nEED Of REInTEgration Support A year after they returned home from the Mtabila Refugee Camp in western Tanzania, former Burundian The beneficiaries have taken up livelihood activities refugees still face socio-economic challenges that such as small scale bakeries, palm oil production, hinder their effective reintegration into communities cassava processing, hair dressing and carpentry. In of return, according to IOM household socio-economic addition to the shelter and livelihood interventions, profiling conducted between 17 June and 24 August IOM has also designed a capacity building exercise 2013. for the livelihood beneficiaries. They will be provided with knowledge on how to manage their businesses The new data reveals acute needs in livelihood, access and the associations that they have established. to health, water and sanitation and access to food, among Burundian returnees who left Mtabila Refugee Camp between 31 October and 11 December 2012. The majority of the returnees have been re-absorbed in their areas of origin but have had to cope with Although all the former refugees are back to their destruction that was brought about by the civil respective communities of origin, their houses and strife in Burundi. The five provinces with the biggest livelihoods were destroyed during the civil war and number of returnees are Makamba, Rutana, Ruyigi, after more than 15 years in Tanzania, they came back Gitega and Karusi. to find destroyed homes. Women and children are most affected by conflcit and form the largest With funding from the European Commission- number of returneed from the Mtabila Refugee camp Marceline was only 14 years old when war broke out Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (ECHO), IOM is in Burundi. She fled to Tanzania and with thousands working with the returnees to construct 2,000 shelters of other Burundian Refugees, she sought refuge in for a corresponding number of most vulnerable Tanzania and was hosted at the Mtabila Refugee returnee households. Camp. “This means so much especially during this extremely She came back to Burundi in November 2012 wet season. Shelter is crucial because apart from and having lived as a refugee for 18 years, her the harsh elements, it provides them with security surroundings felt strange. She had been away for from people with ill intentions,” says Alex Gachara, too long and the effect of the 1993-2005 civil war Chief of Nyabutare in Burundi’s southern Province of was still evident. There are no traces of houses left Makamba. behind by fleeing civilians and the challenge was how to start life anew. IOM is also supporting returnees from 500 families to establish livelihood opportunities. Chief Gachara Marceline is one of the beneficiaries of an IOM however feels that a lot more work needs to be done project that seeks to establish shelter for the to stabilize the returnees’ livelihoods. returned refugees, as well as to establish livelihood opportunities. Her drive for excellence sets her apart “Lives have been lost due to preventable causes such and her passion to make the best out of the situation as malaria. Those who have come back from Mtabila is refreshing. have challenges in accessing food,” adds Mr. Gachara. IOM’E S MERgEncy Post-Arrival say they had limited access to public utilities, the government have set up clinics at the inadequate meals, and a general lack of airport as well as the reception centres, where AssistancE fOR EThIOPIAn privacy. Many of those detained and returned the arriving migrants can receive medical RETURnees from ThE KIngDOM Of to Ethiopia arrived hungry, tired, in need of assistance. SAUDI ARABIA medical support and with little or no personal belongings. The Ethiopian government has dedicated Transit Centres with a carrying capacity of At the beginning of the operation the 6,000 individuals in the capital Addis Ababa. Government of Ethiopia indicated that the In addition, the World Food Programme number of migrants registered and waiting at has provided seven tents that are used for detention centres and police stations in KSA accommodation. Migrants who arrive in the was estimated at 30,000. However, within evening are hosted in these Transit Centres seven days of the operation, this number overnight and allowed to go home in the was revised upwards to 80,000 individuals, morning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uganda Is Now Africa's Biggest Refugees Host
    // The Five Industries Set To // Usher Komugisha: From “Kwepena // Kagame’s African // Kemiyondo Coutinho: How Transform Uganda’s Economy girl” to Globe trotting sports pundit Union Mission She Found Kemi-stry with the Arts! WWW.LEOAFRICAINSTITUTE.ORG ISSUE 2 . OCTOBER 2017 INVESTMENT IN YOUTH KEY TO INNOVATION IN AFRICA INTRODUCING the ‘LITTLE RED CURIOUS’ AND THE ART OF CUSTOM-MADE SUITS future IN UGANDA ///INSIDE UGANDA’S PROGRESSIVE REFUGEES POLICY Introducing the YELP Class of 2017 In January, the Institute welcomed the inaugural The 2017 class includes some of the most class of the Young and Emerging Leaders Project outstanding young and emerging leaders from (YELP). The 2017 class has 20 fellows drawn from Uganda, Kenya and Rwanda working in civil Uganda, Kenya and Rwanda who will undertake society, the public sector and private enterprise. three seminars on defining values in leadership- shaping personal leadership, defining and We anticipate in time to build a critical mass of achieving success, and the graduation seminar individuals committed to personal development, on cultivating servant leadership values - living advancement of career, and shaping a personal legacies. progressive future for East Africa and Africa at large. The fellowship represents our signature leadership development project shaped along In the meantime, join us in welcoming the pioneer the principles of servant leadership. 2017 class who will be graduating early 2018 and will be inducted into the Institute’s network of outstanding individuals in East Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • In Uganda: Making Wcd Recommendations a Reality in Uganda
    A REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON LAUNCHING OF THE WORLD COMMISSION ON DAMS (WCD) IN UGANDA: MAKING WCD RECOMMENDATIONS A REALITY IN UGANDA. ORGANIZED BY THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENTALISTS (NAPE) 19, OCTOBER 2004 HOTEL AFRICANA KAMPALA, UGANDA. Funded By Ford Foundation CONTENTS ACRONYMS………………………………………………………………………….. 3 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………….. 4 1.0. WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS…………………………………………………... 5 1.1. THE OPENING REMARKS………………………………………………………5 1.2. KEYNOTE ADDRESS BY THE WORLD BANK REPRESENTATIVE ……….6 1.3 THE OFFICIAL OPENING. ………………………………………………………7 2.0. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PRESENTATIONS……………………………………..9 2.1. THE GENESIS OF WCD..………………………………………………………...9 2.2. THE WCD AND DAMS DEVELOPKMENT PROJECT (DDP)………………...11 2.3. IMPLICATIONS OF WCD RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEVELOPING UGANDAS WATER AND ENERGY RESOURCES…………………………....13 2.4. MAKING THE WCD RECOMMENDATIONS A REALITY IN UGANDA…...15 2.5. SHARING THE SOUTH AFRICAN EXPERIENCE…………………………….17 3.0. DISCUSSIONS……………………………………………………………………19 4.0. WAY FORWARD…………………………………………………………………21 5.0. WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE……………………………………………...23 APPENDICES I. WORKSHOP PROGRAMME...…………..…………………………………….…………….24 II. MINISTERS’ OPENING SPEECH………………………..…………………..26 III. THE GENESIS OF WCD………………………………………...……………29 IV. THE IMPLICATIONS OF WCD RECOMMENDATION ON DEVELOPING UGANDA’S WATER AND ENERGY RESOURCES….….............................32. V. MAKING WCD RECOMMENDATIONS A REALITY IN UGANDA……...35 VI. SHARING SOUTH AFRICAS’ EXPERIENCE………………………………38 VII. CLOSING
    [Show full text]
  • Donor Engagement in Uganda's Oil and Gas Sector
    DONOR ENGAGEMENT IN UGANDA’s OIL AND GAS SECTOR: AN AGENDA FOR ACTION A BRIEFING BY GLOBAL WITNESS | OCTOBER 2010 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................03 SUMMARY .....................................................................................04 I: UGANDA’S RECENT HISTORY: SOME WORRYING GOVERNANCE TRENDS ......06 II: UGANDA’s emerging oil inDUSTRY .........................................09 III: EARLY WARNING SIGNS FOR UGANDA’S OIL AND GAS SECTOR .................11 IV: THE DONOR APPROACH TO UGANDA’s oil ................................15 CONCLUSION .................................................................................18 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................19 ANNEX: Information for Scandalous? Chart ........................................................................ 21 ENDNOTES ........................................................................................................................ 22 Global Witness is a London-based non-governmental organisation that investigates and campaigns to prevent natural resource-related conflict, corruption and associated environmental and human rights abuses. We aim to improve governance, transparency and accountability in the management of the natural resource sector to ensure that revenues from resources are used for peaceful and sustainable development rather than to finance or fuel conflicts, corruption or state looting. Globally, our investigations and campaigning
    [Show full text]
  • UGANDA COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service
    UGANDA COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service Date 20 April 2011 UGANDA DATE Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN UGANDA FROM 3 FEBRUARY TO 20 APRIL 2011 Useful news sources for further information REPORTS ON UGANDA PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 3 FEBRUARY AND 20 APRIL 2011 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 1.06 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 Political developments: 1962 – early 2011 ......................................................... 3.01 Conflict with Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA): 1986 to 2010.............................. 3.07 Amnesty for rebels (Including LRA combatants) .............................................. 3.09 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................................... 4.01 Kampala bombings July 2010 ............................................................................. 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION.......................................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East African Prospects
    Report East African prospects An update on the political economy of Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda David Booth, Brian Cooksey, Frederick Golooba-Mutebi and Karuti Kanyinga May 2014 May 2014 Report East African prospects An update on the political economy of Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda David Booth, Brian Cooksey, Frederick Golooba-Mutebi and Karuti Kanyinga Prospects in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda are a matter of small variations and stepwise change within ‘limited access orders’ Pockets of crony capitalist success are set to get larger and more dynamic in Kenya, with some spread effects Political obstacles to coordinated sector reform are going to endure, with especially damaging effects in Tanzania The leadership factors that matter are collective and have to do with political organisation and underlying settlements Reforms could be achieved ‘against the odds’ if practical development organisations were to adopt a different way of working Shaping policy for development odi.org Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the large number of individuals who shared views and insights on a confidential basis with the research team. The views expressed in the report are, however, those of the authors alone, and we remain responsible for any errors or omissions. No opinions should be attributed to the Overseas Development Institute. East African prospects i Table of contents Acknowledgements i Abbreviations iv Executive summary vii Framing the study vii Kenya viii Tanzania ix Uganda ix Rwanda x Implications and ways
    [Show full text]
  • Education September 2018
    UNHCR Uganda Monthly Update Protection - Education September 2018 September Developments Key Figures Number of refugee 237,923 children attending (61%) Primary School Number of refugee 17,257 children attending (12%) Secondary School Boys:Girls Girls to Boys Primary attending Primary The Education Response Plan for Refugees and Host Communities in Uganda (ERP) was 53%:47% and Secondary launched in Kampala on 14 September 2018 by the Minister for Education and Sports, Her Secondary Education Excellency Mrs. Janet Museveni, the First Lady of Uganda. This Plan is the first of its kind 70%:30% worldwide and represents a huge policy step forward for refugee education globally. Speaking at this Launch Event, as above, included the Minister for Education and Sports; Alex Kakooza Number of (Permanent Secretary MoES); Minister Hilary Onek (Minister for Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Refugees), Aggrey Kibenge (Under Secretary MoES), Rosa Malango (UN Resident 75,126 refugee children (44%) Coordinator), Joel Boutroue (UNHCR Representative); Jennie Barugh (Former Head of DFID), attending Pre- Yasmine Sherif (Global Director of Education Cannot Wait) and refugee teacher, Dumba Primary Lawrence David from Bidibidi Settlement in Yumbe District. Representation at the Launch also included local government, local and international organisations and Embassies. Achievements (Term 2: January to June 2018) Funding Activity Reached 2018 Term 2 Target UNHCR total requirements: USD 415.2 m Average Number of Pupils to Teacher 236 220 Number of refugee & host
    [Show full text]
  • FAC Joint Field Mission to Uganda
    FAC Joint Field Mission to Uganda June 24 – June 29, 2018 1 / 13 Introduction by FAC Chair 2018 Based on discussions at the Food Assistance Committee (FAC)'s 9th formal Session on 10 November 2017, FAC members conducted their second joint field mission to Uganda from 24 June 2018 to 29 June 2018 to explore the food security situation in the country. This field mission covered a wide variety of food assistance programmes both in humanitarian and development areas. As stated by many participants at the reflection meeting we hold after the visit of many sites in Northern part of that country, in summary, joint field mission can be described as fruitful and successful. I noted those statements on this report in the item ‘Lessons Learned’. To see is to believe. On this trip, we could directly see situation of sites facing insecurity of food, talked to local people, refugees, governmental officials and development partners in the field. I believe those experiences will contribute for more deliberate consideration of food assistance for all of participants As the 2018 FAC Chair, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation to the Government of Uganda and the people concerned in Uganda for warmly accepting our FAC mission. I also appreciate the Field Task Force Team and all the participants for their cooperation making this field mission fruitful and successful. Shuichi Akamatsu Minister for Economy, Embassy of Japan in the United Kingdom (2018 FAC Chair) Purpose The objective of the Food Assistance Committee (FAC) field mission was to give participants the opportunity to see how the broader objectives of the FAC are operationalized at field level, as well as to give members with limited field presence the opportunity to see humanitarian and development programs first-hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Fragmented Ruling Coalitions and Economic Developments in Uganda Anne Mette Kjær and Mesharch Katusiimeh
    DIIS WORKINGDIIS WORKING PAPER 20PAPER12:07 Growing but not transforming: Fragmented ruling coalitions and economic developments in Uganda Anne Mette Kjær and Mesharch Katusiimeh DIIS Working Paper 2012:07 WORKING PAPER WORKING 1 DIIS WORKING PAPER 2012:07 ANNE METTE KJÆR Associate professor Department of Political Science, Aarhus University [email protected] MESHARCH KATUSIIMEH Lecturer in Political Science and Public Administration at Uganda Christian University. DIIS Working Papers make available DIIS researchers’ and DIIS project partners’ work in progress towards proper publishing. They may include important documentation which is not necessarily published elsewhere. DIIS Working Papers are published under the responsibility of the author alone. DIIS Working Papers should not be quoted without the express permission of the author. DIIS WORKING PAPER 2012:07 © The authors and DIIS, Copenhagen 2012 Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS Strandgade 56, DK-1401 Copenhagen, Denmark Ph: +45 32 69 87 87 Fax: +45 32 69 87 00 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.diis.dk Cover Design: Carsten Schiøler Layout: Allan Lind Jørgensen Printed in Denmark by Vesterkopi AS ISBN: 978-87-7605-493-9 Price: DKK 25.00 (VAT included) DIIS publications can be downloaded free of charge from www.diis.dk 2 DIIS WORKING PAPER 2012:07 DIIS WORKING PAPER SUB-SERIES ON ELITES, PRODUCTION AND POVERTY This working paper sub-series includes papers generated in relation to the research programme ‘Elites, Production and Poverty’. This collaborative research programme, launched in 2008, brings together research institutions and universities in Bangladesh, Denmark, Ghana, Mozam- bique, Tanzania and Uganda and is funded by the Danish Consultative Research Committee for Development Research.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR Uganda Operational Update
    OPERATIONAL UPDATE Uganda 1 – 31 July 2020 3,054 new arrivals entered Uganda from the The humanitarian situation remains Of these,,52 are refugees, 47 of whom Democratic Republic of the Congo on 1-3 unpredictable in South Sudan and the DRC. have recovered and been discharged July, following Uganda’s decision to from hospital. So far, four deaths have temporary re-open the border on COVID-19 UPDATE been reported among Ugandan humanitarian grounds. Border controls were Uganda received its first COVID-19 case on nationals. reintroduced on 3 July, once the humanitarian 21 March 2020. There were 1,176 confirmed operation was complete. cases of COVID-19 as of 31July 2020, with 1,029 recoveries. UNHCR’S FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS 2020: 3,054 Number of new arrivals during July 2020 (Zombo). USD 357.1M 1,403,641* UNHCR Funding (as of 31 July 2020) Total refugees in Uganda as of 31 July 2020. 25,262 Total asylum-seekers in Uganda as of 31 July 2020. *Increase in number is due to registration backlog and new-borns Unfunded 68% - 242.1 M Funded 32% - 115 M POPULATION S OF CONCERN Refugees and Asylum-Seekers by Nationality South Sudan 882,031 DR Congo 418,258 Burundi 48,274 Soap distribution in Bidibidi Refugee Settlement, Yumbe district. Photo ©Orkhan Nasibov/UNHCR Others 80,398 TOTAL 1,428,961 www.unhcr.org 1 OPERATIONAL UPDATE > UGANDA / 1 – 31 July 2020 Photo ©Oscar Fridane, 20-year-old Congolese refugee in Uganda, and one of the winners in the cartoon category of the UNHCR 2020 Youth with Refugees Art Contest.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Uganda Facts and Data (June 2011)
    KAS Office Uganda www.kas.de/uganda/en/ Republic of Uganda Facts and Data (June 2011) © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Capital Kampala Form of government Presidential Republic President / Head of State Yoweri Kaguta Museveni Official Language Swahili and English Administration 112 districts in 4 regions (Eastern, Western, Northern and Central Region) Geographical borders Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, Democratic Republic of the Congo, (South)Sudan Area 241,038 sq km1 Popoulation 34.612.250 Ugandans, thereof: Baganda 16.9%, Banyakole 9.5%, Basoga 8.4%, Bakiga 6.9%, Iteso 6.4%, Langi 6.1%, Acholi 4.7%, Bagisu 4.6%, Lugbara 4.2%, Bunyoro 2.7%, other 29.6% Population density 113 inhabitants per km² Population growth 3.576% Human Development Index 0.422 (rank 143 out of 169)2 Gross Domestic Product 17.12 billion US$ (GDP) GDP per capita (PPP) 1.200 US$ Currency 1 USD = 2.408,127 Uganda-Schilling (UGX)3 Independence 9th October 1962 Religion Roman Catholic 41.9%, Protestant 42% (Anglican 35.9%, Pentecostal 4.6%, Seventh Day Adventist 1.5%), Muslim 12.1%, other 3.1%, none 0.9% 1 CIA Factbook; last update 17.05.2011 (applies for all following data) https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ug.html 2 UNDP http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/UGA.html 3 Exchange rate from 18.04.2011 http://www.bankenverband.de/waehrungsrechner/ 1 Table of contents History .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Before colonialism ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Test Results Show UNRA Paid Fake Cousins
    NATIONAL NEWS NEW VISION, Tuesday, September 1, 2015 5 14% of refugee DNA test results show women sexually abused — report UNRA paid fake cousins By Vision Report A study by the Offi ce of the Prime Minister While appearing before the among individuals, where they February, 4, 2014, the three, who (OPM), has revealed that refugees in commission recently, the trio were able to get the ‘Y-Haplotype’ were largely known as bricklayers, Uganda enjoy better access to social claimed to have inherited the land for each of them. received sh4.1b on their joint services than the host communities, which from their grandfather. He stressed that if the three were account in Diamond Trust Bank. has escalated confl icts, including sexual The suspects were later handed cousin, they would have had the This was in compensation for a 47- violence. over to senior Police detectives same Y-Haplotype, which was not acre piece of land in Nakigalala, The study discovered that 14% of refugee led by Beata Chelimo. They were the case. Kajjansi Central Forest Reserve women get raped or sexually harassed by taken to the Government Analytical “If the three were cousins, they ,along the 53km Entebbe-Kampala men from host communities as they go to Laboratory at Wandegeya for a are supposed to share the same Expressway project. collect fi rewood and food. test to establish their paternal Y-Haplotype. We get this from our The three, who are said to have The study, funded by the United Nations relationship. fathers who also get it from our withdrawn the money in just four High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) Testifying before the commission grandfathers.
    [Show full text]
  • CURTAILING CRITICISM Intimidation and Obstruction of Civil Society in Uganda
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH CURTAILING CRITICISM Intimidation and Obstruction of Civil Society in Uganda Curtailing Criticism Intimidation and Obstruction of Civil Society in Uganda Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-928-3 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org AUGUST 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-928-3 Curtailing Criticism Intimidation and Obstruction of Civil Society in Uganda Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]