DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 14. Enzyme Kinetics Chemical Kinetics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 14. Enzyme Kinetics Chemical Kinetics Chapter 14. Enzyme Kinetics Chemical kinetics • Elementary reactions A → P (Overall stoichiometry) I1 → I2 (Intermediates) • Rate equations aA+ bB+ … +zZ → P Rate = k[A]a[B]b…[Z]z k: rate constant • The order of the reaction (a+b+…+z): Molecularity of the reaction – Unimolecular (first order) reactions: A → P – Bimolecular (second order) reactions: 2A → P or A + B → P – Termolecular (third order) reactions Rates of reactions A → P (First-order reaction) d[P] d[A] v = = - = k[A] dt dt 2A → P (Second-order reaction) d[P] d[A] v = = - = k[A]2 dt dt A + B → P (Second-order reaction) d[P] d[A] d[B] v = = -= - = k[A][B] dt dt dt Rate constant for the first-order reaction d[A] v = − = k[A] dt d[A] = −kdt [A] [A] d[A] t = −k dt ∫∫[A]0 [A] 0 ln[A]− ln[A]0 = −kt ln[A] = ln[A]0 − kt −kt [A] = [A]0 e (t) The reactant concentration decreases exponentially with time Half-life is constant for a first-order reaction ln[A]− ln[A]0 = −kt [A] ln = −kt [A]0 1 ln = −kt1 / 2 2 ln 2 0.693 t1 / 2 = = k k For the first-order reaction, half-life is independent of the initial reactant concentration Second-order reaction with one reactant 2A → P d[A] v = − = k[A]2 dt d[A] 1 Slope= k = −kdt [A]2 [A] [A] d[A] t 2 = −k dt ∫∫[A]0 [A] 0 1 1 1 = + kt [A]0 [A] [A]0 Time (t) 2 1 1 kt1 / 2 = − = [A]0 [A]0 [A]0 1 t1 / 2 = Half-life is dependent on the initial reactant concentration k[A]0 Pseudo first-order reactions v = k[A][B] When [B] >> [A], v = k′[A] where k′ = k[B]0 e.g. B is water (55.5M): k'= 55.5k Arrhenius equation k = Ae-Ea/RT = Activation energy (Ea) Multistep reactions have rate-determining steps k1 > k2 k1 < k2 k 1 k2 Rate-determining step: the slow step (= the higher activation energy) Catalysts reduce the activation energy ΔEa (the reduction in Ea by the catalyst) ΔEa/RT Rate enhancement = kcat/kuncat = e e.g. When ΔEa = 5.7 kJ/mol, the reaction rate increases 10 fold 6 When ΔEa = 34 kJ/mol, the reaction rate increases 10 fold Michaelis-Menten equation Vmax[S] v0 = KM +[S] • v0 = the initial rate • Vmax = the maximum rate • KM = the Michaelis constant • [S] = the substrate concentration Steady state approximation k1 k2 E + S ES P + E k-1 Derivatization of Michaelis-Menten equation k1 k2 E + S ES P + E k-1 d[P] v = = k 2[ES] dt d[ES] = k 1[E][S]− k − 1[ES]− k 2[ES] = 0 (Steady state approximation) dt [E]T = [E]+[ES] k 1([E]T −[ES])[S] = (k − 1 + k 2)[ES] (k − 1 + k 2 + k 1[S])[ES] = k 1[E]T[S] k − 1 + k 2 ( +[S])[ES] = [E]T[S] k 1 [E]T[S] [ES] = k − 1 + k 2 +[S] k 1 [E]T[S] k − 1 + k 2 [ES] = where KM = KM +[S] k 1 k 2[E]T[S] The initial velocity v0 = k 2[ES] = KM +[S] The maximum velocity (Vmax) occurs at high substrate concentration when the enzyme is entirely in the [ES] form : Vmax = k 2[E]T Vmax[S] v0 = KM +[S] Michaelis constant KM KM = [S] at which v0 = Vmax/2 • If an enzyme has a small value of KM, it achieves maximal catalytic efficiency at low substrate concentrations • Measure of the enzyme’s binding affinity for the substrate (The lower KM, the higher affinity) Lineweaver-Burke plot Vmax[S] v0 = K M +[S] 1 K +[S] = M v0 Vmax[S] 1 ⎛ KM ⎞ 1 1 = ⎜ ⎟ + v0 ⎝Vmax ⎠ [S] Vmax kcat/KM is a measure of catalytic efficiency Catalytic constant or turnover number of an enzyme: Vmax kcat = [E]T When KM >> [S] , very little ES is formed and consequently [E] ≈ [E]T Vmax[S] Vmax[S] kcat[E]T[S] ⎛ kcat ⎞ v0 = ≈ = ≈ ⎜ ⎟[E][S] KM + [S] KM KM ⎝ KM ⎠ Catalytic perfection kcat k 2 k 1k 2 = = KM KM k − 1 + k 2 The ratio is maximal when k 2 >> k − 1, kcat = k 1 KM (Diffusion-controlled limit: 108 to 109 M-1s-1) Inhibitors • Substances that reduce an enzyme’s activity – Study of enzymatic mechanism – Therapeutic agents • Reversible or irreversible inhibitors - O CO2 - O CO2 - O N CO2 H - NH2 N CO2 N H HN N N N N H H2N N N CH3 H N N N H 2 Dihydrofolate Methotrexate (Dihydrofolate reductase substrate) (Dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, anticancer drug ) Modes of the reversible inhibition • Competitive inhibitors – Binds to the substrate binding site • Uncompetitive inhibitors – Binds to enzyme- substrate complex • Non-competitive inhibitors – Binds to a site different from the substrate binding site • Mixed inhibitors – Binds to the substrate- binding site and the enzyme-substrate Competitive inhibition [E][I] KI = [EI] d[ES] = k 1[E][S]− k − 1[ES]− k 2[ES] = 0 (Steady state approximation) dt ⎛ k − 1 + k 2 ⎞ [ES] KM[ES] [E] = ⎜ ⎟ = ⎝ k 1 ⎠ [S] [S] [E][I] KM[ES][I] [EI] = = KI [S]KI [E]T = [E]+[EI]+[ES] KM[ES] KM[ES][I] ⎧KM ⎛ [I]⎞ ⎫ [E]T = + +[ES] = [ES]⎨ ⎜1+ ⎟ +1⎬ [S] [S]KI ⎩[S] ⎝ KI ⎠ ⎭ [E]T[S] [ES] = ⎛ [I]⎞ KM ⎜1+ ⎟ +[S] ⎝ KI ⎠ k 2[E]T[S] v0 = k 2[ES] = ⎛ [I]⎞ KM ⎜1+ ⎟ +[S] ⎝ KI ⎠ Since Vmax = k 2[E]T, Vmax[S] [I] v0 = where α =1+ αKM +[S] KI Competitive inhibitors affect KM Vmax[S] v0 = αKM +[S] [S] → ∞; v0 →Vmax regardless of α Determination of KI of the competitive inhibitor 1 ⎛αKM ⎞ 1 1 = ⎜ ⎟ + v0 ⎝ V max ⎠ [S] V max Uncompetitive inhibition [ES][I] KI'= [ESI] KM[ES] [E] = [S] [ES][I] [ESI] = KI' [E]T = [E]+[ES]+[ESI] KM[ES] [ES][I] ⎛ KM [I] ⎞ [E]T = +[ES]+ = [ES]⎜ +1+ ⎟ [S] KI' ⎝ [S] KI' ⎠ [E]T[S] [ES] = ⎛ [I] ⎞ KM + ⎜1+ ⎟[S] ⎝ KI' ⎠ k 2[E]T[S] v0 = k 2[ES] = ⎛ [I] ⎞ KM + ⎜1+ ⎟[S] ⎝ KI' ⎠ Since Vmax = k 2[E]T, V max [S] Vmax[S] α' [I] v0 = = where α'=1+ K +α'[S] K KI' M M +[S] α' Uncompetitive inhibitors decrease both Vmax and KM V max [S] v = α' 0 K M +[S] α' V [S] → ∞; v → max 0 α' Vmax (Effects of an uncompetitive inhibitor KM >> [S]; v0 → [S] K M become negligible) Vmax no inhibitor (α'=1) Increasing [I] I Vmax v0 Vmax/2 [I] I Vmax /2 α'=1+ KI' I KM KM [S] Determination of KI’ of the uncompetitive inhibitor 1 ⎛ KM ⎞ 1 α' = ⎜ ⎟ + v0 ⎝V max ⎠ [S] V max Mixed inhibition [E][I] [ES][I] KI = KI'= [EI] [ESI] [E][I] [EI] = KI [ES][I] [ESI] = KI' [E]T = [E]+[EI]+[ES]+[ESI] ⎛ [I]⎞ ⎛ [I] ⎞ [E]T = [E]⎜1+ ⎟ +[ES]⎜1+ ⎟ ⎝ KI ⎠ ⎝ KI' ⎠ [E]T = [E]α +[ES]α' KM[ES] ⎛αKM ⎞ [E]T = α +[ES]α'= [ES]⎜ +α'⎟ [S] ⎝ [S] ⎠ [E]T[S] [ES] = αKM +α'[S] k 2[E]T[S] v0 = k 2[ES] = αKM +α'[S] Since Vmax = k 2[E]T, Vmax[S] [I] [I] v0 = where α =1+ and α'=1+ αKM +α'[S] KI KI' Lineweaver-Burk plot of a mixed inhibition 1 ⎛αKM ⎞ 1 α' = ⎜ ⎟ + v0 ⎝ V max ⎠ [S] V max Noncompetitive inhibition A special mixed inhibition when KI = KI’ Vmax[S] [I] [I] v0 = where α =1+ and α'=1+ αKM +α'[S] KI KI' When KI = KI', α = α' V max [S] Vmax[S] α v0 = = α(K M +[S]) KM +[S] Noncompetitive inhibitors affect not KM but Vmax V max [S] α [I] v0 = where α =1+ K M +[S] KI V [S] → ∞; v → max 0 α Vmax no inhibitor (α=1) I Increasing [I] Vmax v0 Vmax/2 V I/2 [I] max α =1+ KI [S] KM Determination of KI of the noncompetitive inhibitor 1 ⎛αKM ⎞ 1 α = ⎜ ⎟ + v0 ⎝ V max ⎠ [S] V max 1/v0 α = 2 Increasing α= 1.5 [I] α= 1 (no inhibitor) Slope=αKM/Vmax [I] α =1+ α/Vmax KI 1 − 0 1/[S] KM Effects of inhibitors on Vmax and KM of the Michaelis-Menten equation app Vmax [S] v0 = app K M +[S] Effects of pH ' Vmax[S] • Binding of substrate to enzyme v0 = ' KM +[S] • Catalytic activity of enzyme ' ' Vmax = Vmax / f 2 and KM = KM ( f 1 / f 2) • Ionization of substrate where + • Variation of protein structure [H ] KE2 f 1 = +1+ + (only at extreme pHs) KE1 [H ] + [H ] KES2 f 2 = +1+ + KES1 [H ] - E ES- K H+ + E2 KES2 H k1 k2 EH + S ESH P + EH k + -1 + KE1 H KES1 H + + EH2 ESH2 Approximate identity of catalytic amino acid residues pKa ~4 → Catalytic Asp or Glu residue pKa ~6 → Catalytic His residue pKa ~10 → Catalytic Lys residue Caution should be taken because pKa of amino acid residues are environmentally sensitive Bisubstrate reactions • 60% of biochemical reactions involve two substrates and two products • Transfer reactions and oxidation-reduction reactions Cleland’s nomenclature system for the enzymatic reactions • Substrates: A, B, C, D… in the order that they add to the enzyme • Products: P, Q, R, S… in the order that they leave the enzyme • Inhibitors: I, J, K, L… • Stable enzyme complexes: E, F, G, H… with E being the free enzyme • Numbers of reactants and products: Uni (one), Bi (two), Ter (three), and Quad (four) e.g. Bi Bi reaction: a reaction that requires two substrates and yields two products Types of Bi Bi Reactions • Sequential reactions (single displacement reactions): all substrates bind before chemical event Ordered mechanism Random mechanism • Ping pong reactions (double displacement reactions): chemistry occurs prior to binding of all substrates Differentiating bisubstrate mechanisms • Measure rates • Change concentration of substrates and products • Lineweaver-Burk plot – Intercept (1/Vmax): the velocity at saturated substrate concentration → It changes when the substrate A binds to a different enzyme form with the substrate B – Slope (KM/Vmax): the rate at low substrate concentration → It changes when both A and B reversibly bind to an enzyme form Ping Pong Bi Bi Mechanism • Intercept changes because A and B bind to the different enzyme forms E and F, respectively • Slope remains same because the binding of A and B is irreversible due to the release of the product (P) Sequential Bi Bi Mechanism or Ordered Random • Intercept changes because A and B binds to the different enzyme forms (E or EB) and (EA or E), respectively • Slope changes because the binding of A and B is reversible Differentiating Bi Bi mechanisms by product inhibition Competitive inhibition → Substrate and inhibitor competitively bind to the same site of the enzyme A vs Q: Competitive B vs P: Competitive Ping Pong A vs P: Noncompetitive B vs Q: Noncompetitive A vs Q: Competitive B vs P: Noncompetitive Ordered A vs P: Noncompetitive sequential B vs Q: Noncompetitive Under assumption of dead-end complex formation (A is similar with Q and B is similar
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4. Enzyme Kinetics
    Chapter 4. Enzyme Kinetics Enzyme Engineering 4.1 Why is enzyme kinetics important? 1. It provides valuable information for enzyme mechanism 2. It gives an insight into the role of an enzyme under physiological conditions 3. It can help show how the enzyme activity is controlled and regulated 1 4.2 How to obtain enzyme kinetics? Measure the formation of product or disappearance of substrate Mg2+ D-Glucose + ATP D-Glucose-6-phosphate + ADP 1. Discontinuous method Add the enzyme, then stop the reaction at different time by adding acid to the sample Measure the concentration of substrate or product using HPLC or other chromatography 4.2 How to obtain enzyme kinetics? 2. Continuous method Mg2+ D-Glucose + ATP D-Glucose-6-phosphate + ADP NADP+ NADPH D-Glucono-δ-lactone 6-phosphate + ADP NADPH absorb at 340nm, while NADP+ does not If a coupled reaction is used, the second reaction should not be rate-limiting (sufficient amount of the enzyme must be provided) Continuous method is not always available 2 4.2 How to obtain enzyme kinetics? Radioactive or fluorescent-labeling is useful Precautions The substrate, buffers, etc. must be extremely pure Enzyme should be pure Enzyme should be stable as the assay is proceeded * Temp, pH must be maintained carefully Once steady state is achieved, reaction rate must be constant and proportional to the enzyme added Initial rate of reaction should be measured to avoid possible complexity 4.3 How to analyze kinetic data? 4.3.1 One substrate reactions k 1 k2 E + S ES E + P k-1 Equilibrium assumption (1913) Second reaction is slower than first reverse reaction (k-1 >> k2) Vmax[S] V0 = Michaelis-Menten eqn K s +[S] [E][S] Vmax = k2[E]0 K = s [ES] 3 4.3 How to analyze kinetic data? Steady state assumption (1925) [ES] is constant Vmax[S] V0 = Km +[S] Vmax = k2[E]0 k2 + k−1 Km = k1 4.3.1 One substrate reactions Lineweaver-Burk equation 1 K 1 1 = m + v [S] Vmax Vmax Eddie-Hofstee equation v V v = max − [S] Km Km 4 4.3.1 One substrate reactions Significance of the result 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalase Kinetics
    Experiment #4: Catalase Kinetics MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Chemistry 5.310 Laboratory Chemistry 1 EXPERIMENT #4 A Study of the Kinetics of the Enzyme Catalase and its Reaction 2 3 With H2O2. A Further Study on Protein Assay Quantitation of Catalase I. OVERVIEW OF THE EXPERIMENT In this experiment, the student will investigate the enzyme activity of catalase by studying the decomposition of H2O2 to form water and oxygen. Using an oxygen based pressure sensor the student measures the amount of oxygen produced and then calculates the rate of the enzyme catalyzed reaction under various conditions. The student also completes a Protein Assay on an unknown sample of catalase using the Coomassie® Plus Protein Assay from Pierce to determine the protein concentration of the sample. The correlation between the actual and calculated concentration gives an indication of the experimental skills used in carrying out the experiment. II. OBJECTIVES This is an integrated experiment that includes topics from physical chemistry and biochemistry. It is designed to introduce students to the basics of: • Studying the effects of reaction environment, including temperature, and varying substrate concentration on the rate of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. • Combining physical chemistry and biochemistry, principles and theory, with the goal of determining various biochemical and biophysical constants for the enzyme catalase. • How to acquire experimental kinetic data for an enzyme catalyzed reaction. • Learning how to perform data manipulation in order to extract out information such as rate constants from experimental kinetic data. • Correct handling of UV-VIS Spectroscopy 1 This experiment was synthesized by John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of the Overall Kinetic Parameters of Enzyme Inactivation Using an Isoconversional Method D
    Estimation of the overall kinetic parameters of enzyme inactivation using an isoconversional method D. Oancea, Alexandrina Stuparu, Madalina Nita, Mihaela Puiu, Adina Raducan To cite this version: D. Oancea, Alexandrina Stuparu, Madalina Nita, Mihaela Puiu, Adina Raducan. Estimation of the overall kinetic parameters of enzyme inactivation using an isoconversional method. Biophysical Chemistry, Elsevier, 2008, 138 (1-2), pp.50. 10.1016/j.bpc.2008.09.003. hal-00501718 HAL Id: hal-00501718 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00501718 Submitted on 12 Jul 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Estimation of the overall kinetic parameters of enzyme inactivation using an isoconversional method D. Oancea, Alexandrina Stuparu, Madalina Nita, Mihaela Puiu, Adina Raducan PII: S0301-4622(08)00176-2 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2008.09.003 Reference: BIOCHE 5155 To appear in: Biophysical Chemistry Received date: 17 August 2008 Revised date: 2 September 2008 Accepted date: 3 September 2008 Please cite this article as: D. Oancea, Alexandrina Stuparu, Madalina Nita, Mi- haela Puiu, Adina Raducan, Estimation of the overall kinetic parameters of en- zyme inactivation using an isoconversional method, Biophysical Chemistry (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2008.09.003 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Enzyme Kinetics in the Eppendorf Biospectrometer® Kinetic Using a Hexokinase and Glucose-6- Phosphate-Dehydrogenase from Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    USERGUIDE No. 39 I Detection I September 2014 Determination of enzyme kinetics in the Eppendorf BioSpectrometer® kinetic using a hexokinase and glucose-6- phosphate-dehydrogenase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae Martin Armbrecht, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany Abstract This Userguide will demonstrate measurement of enzyme activity using the Eppendorf BioSpectrometer. In order to optimize the measurement process, preliminary measurements were performed using the method “single continuous”. The actual activity measurements were then performed based on these results. Enzyme activities were determined via linear regression. For the measurements, a coupled reaction of a hexokinase and a glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase from the baker’s yeast ‚ was used. Since the Eppendorf BioSpectrometer kinetic is equipped with a temperature controlled cuvette chamber, temperature dependence of this reaction could also be demonstrated. The highest activity was detected at 37 °C. Introduction Metabolic significance of the hexokinase reaction Activation of glucose via the hexokinase reaction Glycolysis Glucose degradation thus sustains respiration of all living beings. One central area within the metabolism of nearly all living beings is Prior to degradation, glucose needs to be rendered susceptible for the enzymatic degradation of glucose in the cytosol, or cytoplasma, degradation, i.e., activated. This process involves phosphorylation by respectively, in their cells. This process is called glycolysis. Glucose a hexokinase; with the expenditure of ATP, glucose-6-phosphate is is converted to 2 molecules of pyruvate in a stepwise fashion. One produced. Thus, the latter is the actual initial substrate of glycolysis molecule of glucose yields 2 ATP and 2 redox equivalents in the form (fig.1). In addition, glucose-6-phosphate is the initial substrate of a further of NADPH2.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Errors of Interpretation in Experiments in Enzyme Kinetics
    METHODS 24, 181±190 (2001) doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1179, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Detection of Errors of Interpretation in Experiments in Enzyme Kinetics Athel Cornish-Bowden1 Institut FeÂdeÂratif ªBiologie Structurale et Microbiologie,º BioeÂnergeÂtique et IngeÂnierie des ProteÂines, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 31 chemin Joseph-Aiguier, B.P. 71, 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France points necessary for modern users are to be aware (at Although modern statistical computing will often be the method least qualitatively) of the assumptions that underlie of choice for analyzing kinetic data, graphic methods provide an important supplement that ought not to be neglected. Residual the statistical analysis and to be aware also that they plots, or plots of differences between observed and calculated are not always true (2). By contrast we shall be con- values against variables not expected to be correlated with these cerned with methods that require no detailed mathe- differences, permit a rapid judgment of whether data have been matics and can readily be applied to published graphs correctly interpreted and analyzed. The rapid increase in the fre- (or even to graphs displayed on a screen during a lec- quency with which artificially modified or mutated enzymes are ture) without access to the numerical coordinates of studied is making it less and less safe to assume that enzymes the observations. More generally, this article argues for are stable under assay conditions, and there is thus an increased more reliance on common sense and graphic analysis need for methods to check for enzyme stability, and a method and less on automatic analysis performed by computer: for doing this is briefly described.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromatographic Resolution and Kinetic Characterization Of
    Proc. NatL Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 80, pp. 8589, January 1983 Biochemistry Chromatographic resolution and kinetic characterization of glucokinase from islets of Langerhans (hexoldnase/islet glucose metabolism /N-acetylglucosamine kdnase/Cibacron blue) MARTIN D. MEGLASSON, PAMELA TRUEHEART BURCH, DONNA K. BERNER, HABIBA NAJAFI, ALAN P. VOGIN, AND FRANZ M. MATSCHINSKY* Diabetes Research Center and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 Communicated by Robert E. Forster, October 4, 1982' ABSTRACT Glucokinase (ATP:D-glucose 6-phosphotransfer- ofislets equals serum glucose and islet glucose 6-phosphate in- ase, EC 2.7.1.2) from rat islets of Langerhans was partially pu- creases in proportion to extracellular glucose (1, 13). Ninety rified by chromatography on DEAE-Cibacron blue F3GA agar- percent ofislet glucose utilization occurs with an apparent glu- ose. The enzyme eluted in two separate peaks. Sigmoidal rate cose affinity constant 11.1 mM (6). Also, mannoheptulose, an dependence was found with respect to glucose (Hill coefficient inhibitor of glucokinase (8), profoundly inhibits islet glucose = 1.5) for both enzyme fractions. K. values for glucose were 5.7 metabolism. (14). mM for the major fraction and 4.5 mM for the minor fraction. The chromatographic separation of glucokinase from other Neither fraction phosphorylated GlcNAc. A' GlcNAc kinase is the most direct (ATP. 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucose' 6-phosphotransferase; EC glucose phosphorylating enzymes approach 2.7.1.59)-enriched fraction; prepared by affinity chromatography to establish its presence in pancreatic islets. It is the purpose on Sepharose-N46-aminohexanoyl)-GlcNAc, had a K.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetics the Michaelis-Menten Model for Enzyme Kinetics Presumes A
    Michaelis-Menten (steady-state) Kinetics The Michaelis-Menten model for enzyme kinetics presumes a simple 2-step reaction: Step 1 : Binding – the substrate binds to the enzyme k1 k2 Step 2 : Catalysis – the substrate is converted to product and released E + S ES E + P (Note that enzymes not matching this reaction scheme may still show similar kinetics.) k-1 k-2 The Michaelis-Menten equation shows how the initial rate of Binding Catalysis ͐(3 ʞSʟ this reaction, Vo, depends on the substrate concentration, [S]: ͐* = ͅ( + ʞSʟ Several simplifying assumptions allow for the derivation of the Michaelis-Menten equation: (1) The binding step ( E + S ES ) is fast, allowing the reaction to quickly reach equilibrium ratios of [E], [S], and [ES]. The catalytic step ( ES E + P ) is slower, and thus rate-limiting. (2) At early time points, where initial velocity ( Vo) is measured, [P] ≈ 0. (3) ES immediately comes to steady state, so [ES] is constant (throughout the measured portion of the reaction). (4) [S] >> [E T], so the fraction of S that binds to E (to form ES) is negligible, and [S] is constant at early time points. (5) The enzyme exists in only two forms: free (E), and substrate-bound (ES). Thus, the total enzyme concentration (E T) is the sum of the free and substrate-bound concentrations: [E T] = [E] + [ES] A derivation of the Michaelis-Menten equation shows how to use the above assumptions to describe the rate of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction in terms of measurable quantities: From (1), we know the overall rate of the reaction is determined by the rate of the catalytic step: ͐* = ͦ͟ʞES ʟ − ͯͦ͟ʞEʟʞPʟ From (2), the second term equals zero, so we are left with: ͐* = ͦ͟ʞES ʟ We want to describe Vo in measurable quantities, but [ES] is not easy to Rate of formation of ES = Rate of breakdown of ES measure.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiveling Domain Mechanism in Pyruvate Phosphate Dikinase†,‡ Kap Lim,§ Randy J
    Biochemistry 2007, 46, 14845-14853 14845 Swiveling Domain Mechanism in Pyruvate Phosphate Dikinase†,‡ Kap Lim,§ Randy J. Read,| Celia C. H. Chen,§ Aleksandra Tempczyk,§ Min Wei,⊥ Dongmei Ye,⊥ Chun Wu,⊥ Debra Dunaway-Mariano,⊥ and Osnat Herzberg*,§ Center for AdVanced Research in Biotechnology, UniVersity of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, RockVille, Maryland 20850, Department of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, UniVersity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico ReceiVed September 10, 2007; ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed October 17, 2007 ABSTRACT: Pyruvate phosphate dikinase (PPDK) catalyzes the reversible conversion of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), AMP, and Pi to pyruvate and ATP. The enzyme contains two remotely located reaction centers: the nucleotide partial reaction takes place at the N-terminal domain, and the PEP/pyruvate partial reaction takes place at the C-terminal domain. A central domain, tethered to the N- and C-terminal domains by two closely associated linkers, contains a phosphorylatable histidine residue (His455). The molecular architecture suggests a swiveling domain mechanism that shuttles a phosphoryl group between the two reaction centers. In an early structure of PPDK from Clostridium symbiosum, the His445-containing domain (His domain) was positioned close to the nucleotide binding domain and did not contact the PEP/pyruvate- binding domain. Here, we present the crystal structure of a second conformational state of C. symbiosum PPDK with the His domain adjacent to the PEP-binding domain. The structure was obtained by producing a three-residue mutant protein (R219E/E271R/S262D) that introduces repulsion between the His and nucleotide-binding domains but preserves viable interactions with the PEP/pyruvate-binding domain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Accumulation and Molecular Effects of Trimethylamine N-Oxide on Metabolic Tissues: It’S Not All Bad
    nutrients Review The Accumulation and Molecular Effects of Trimethylamine N-Oxide on Metabolic Tissues: It’s Not All Bad Emily S. Krueger 1 , Trevor S. Lloyd 1,2 and Jeffery S. Tessem 1,* 1 Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; [email protected] (E.S.K.); [email protected] (T.S.L.) 2 Medical Education Program, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-801-422-9082 Abstract: Since elevated serum levels of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) were first associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), TMAO research among chronic diseases has grown exponentially. We now know that serum TMAO accumulation begins with dietary choline metabolism across the microbiome-liver-kidney axis, which is typically dysregulated during pathogenesis. While CVD research links TMAO to atherosclerotic mechanisms in vascular tissue, its molecular effects on metabolic tissues are unclear. Here we report the current standing of TMAO research in metabolic disease contexts across relevant tissues including the liver, kidney, brain, adipose, and muscle. Since poor blood glucose management is a hallmark of metabolic diseases, we also explore the variable TMAO effects on insulin resistance and insulin production. Among metabolic tissues, hepatic TMAO research is the most common, whereas its effects on other tissues including the insulin producing pancreatic β-cells are largely unexplored. Studies on diseases including obesity, diabetes, liver diseases, chronic kidney disease, and cognitive diseases reveal that TMAO effects are unique under pathologic conditions compared to healthy controls. We conclude that molecular TMAO effects are highly context-dependent and call for further research to clarify the deleterious and beneficial Citation: Krueger, E.S.; Lloyd, T.S.; molecular effects observed in metabolic disease research.
    [Show full text]
  • Enzyme Kinetics in This Exercise We Will Look at the Catalytic Behavior of Enzymes
    1 Enzyme Kinetics In this exercise we will look at the catalytic behavior of enzymes. You will use Excel to answer the questions in the exercise section. At the end of this session, you must hand in answers to all the questions, along with print outs of any plots you created. Background Enzymes are the catalysts of biological systems and are extremely efficient and specific as catalysts. In fact, typically, an enzyme accelerates the rate of a reaction by factors of at least a million compared to the rate of the same reaction in the absence of the enzyme. Most biological reactions do not occur at perceptible rates in the absence of enzymes. One of the simplest biological reactions catalyzed by an enzyme is the hydration of CO2. The catalyst in this reaction is carbonic anhydrase. This reaction is part of the respiration cycle which expels CO2 from the body. Carbonic anhydrase is a highly efficient enzyme – each enzyme molecule 5 can catalyze the hydration of 10 CO2 molecules per second. Enzymes are highly specific. Typically a particular enzyme catalyzes only a single chemical reaction or a set of closely related chemical reactions. As is true of any catalyst, enzymes do not alter the equilibrium point of the reaction. This means that the enzyme accelerates the forward and reverse reaction by precisely the same factor. For example, consider the interconversion of A and B. A ↔ B (1) -4 -1 Suppose that in the absence of the enzyme the forward rate constant (kf) is 10 s and the -6 -1 reverse rate constant (kr) is 10 s .
    [Show full text]
  • I Michaelis-Menten Kinetics the Goal of This Chapter Is to Develop The
    I Michaelis-Menten kinetics The goal of this chapter is to develop the mathematical techniques to quantitatively model biochemical reactions. Biochemical reactions in living cells are often catalyzed by enzymes. These enzymes are proteins that bind and subsequently react specifically with other molecules (other proteins, DNA, RNA, or small molecules) defined as substrates. A few examples: 1. The conversion of glucose (substrate) into glucose-6-phosphate (product) by the protein hexokinase (enzyme). 2. Transcription: binding of the RNA polymerase (enzyme) to the promoter region of the DNA (substrate) results in transcription of the mRNA (product). 3. The phosphorylation of a protein: the unphosphorylated protein CheY (substrate, regulating the direction of rotation of the bacterial flagella) is phosphorylated by a phosphate CheZ (enzyme) resulting in CheY-p (product). All these reactions involve a substrate S reacting with an enzyme E to form a complex ES which then in turn is converted into product P and the enzyme: k1 k2 E + S ES E + P [I.1] k-1 In this scheme there are two fundamental different reactions. The first reaction depicted with the double arrow is a reversible reaction reflecting the reversible binding and unbinding of the enzyme and the substrate. The second reaction is an irreversible reaction in which the enzyme-substrate complex is irreversibly converted into product and enzyme symbolized by the single arrow. The rate of a reaction is proportional to the product of the concentrations of the reactants. The kinetics of the chemical equations above is described by the following set of coupled differential equations: 2 7.81/8.591/9.531 Systems Biology – A.
    [Show full text]
  • Math for Biology - an Introduction
    Math for Biology - An Introduction Terri A. Grosso Outline Math for Biology - An Introduction Differential Equations - An Overview The Law of Terri A. Grosso Mass Action Enzyme Kinetics CMACS Workshop 2012 January 6, 2011 Terri A. Grosso Math for Biology - An Introduction Math for Biology - An Introduction Terri A. Grosso Outline 1 Differential Equations - An Overview Differential Equations - An Overview The Law of 2 The Law of Mass Action Mass Action Enzyme Kinetics 3 Enzyme Kinetics Terri A. Grosso Math for Biology - An Introduction Differential Equations - Our Goal Math for Biology - An Introduction Terri A. Grosso Outline We will NOT be solving differential equations Differential Equations - An Overview The tools - Rule Bender and BioNetGen - will do that for The Law of us Mass Action This lecture is designed to give some background about Enzyme Kinetics what the programs are doing Terri A. Grosso Math for Biology - An Introduction Differential Equations - An Overview Math for Biology - An Introduction Terri A. Grosso Differential Equations contain the derivatives of (possibly) unknown functions. Outline Differential Represent how a function is changing. Equations - An Overview We work with first-order differential equations - only The Law of Mass Action include first derivatives Enzyme Generally real-world differential equations are not directly Kinetics solvable. Often we use numerical approximations to get an idea of the unknown function's shape. Terri A. Grosso Math for Biology - An Introduction A few solutions. Figure: Some solutions to f 0(x) = 2 Differential Equations - Starting from the solution Math for 0 Biology - An A differential equation: f (x) = C Introduction Terri A.
    [Show full text]